Abstract
Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase (G6PS) (EC 2.6.1.16) is a known target for anti-bacterial and anti-fungal infections. Therefore, it is of interest to design potential inhibitors using 1, 5 benzo-thiazepine skeleton with appropriate modifications. We report the binding data for 20 derivatives of the skeleton molecule to G6PS having binding energy from -7.35 to -9.99 Kcal/mol with predicted IC50 value range of 4.11 to 47.68 nano-molar. It should be noted that this data should be further evaluated using in vitro and in vivo studies for safety, activity, efficacy and toxicity.
Keywords: Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase; 1,5 Benzothiazepine; antifungal; antimicrobial; docking; binding energy
Background
L-Glutamine: d-fructose-6-phosphate amido-transferase, also known as glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase (GlcN6P synthase) [1], Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase (L-glutamine: D-fructose-6-phosphate amino-transferase (GlmS, 1 EC 2.6.1.16)) catalyzes the first step in hexos-amine biosynthesis, an important constituent of the peptido-glycan layer of bacterial cell walls and fungal cell wall chitin [2]. Purification, partial biochemical and dynamics characterization of glucosamine-6- phosphate synthase was reported by Gonzalez et al. [3] and Mouilleron et al. [4] and its ability to act as antifungal drug target has been evaluated using modeling and structure based drug design by Wojciechowski et al. [5], whereas its catalytic function was described by Durand et al. [6]. Role of GlcN6P synthase in bacteria, eukaryotic organisms, glucose metabolism related to diabetes, cancer, inflammation and ulcer has been reviewed elsewhere [7] and hence, its potential as an antifungal target is known.
On the other hand, 1,5 benzo-thiazepines nucleus having prominent activities against microbes is known [8–10]. A recent pharmaco-phore based studies by Bariwal et al. [11] elucidated the potential of 1,5 benzo-thiazepine based compounds as promising drug like molecules. Recently, Banerjee et al. [12–13] has demonstrated the use of peptide inhibitors for GlcN6P. Miszkiel et al. [14] performed long-range molecular dynamics simulation for understanding the molecular function of eukaryotic G6PS. Therefore, it is of interest todesign potential inhibitors using 1, 5 benzo-thiazepine skeleton withappropriate modifications.
Methodology
Software and programs:
Accelry׳s Discovery studio version 4.0 [15] is utilized to visualize the ligand structures, receptors and hydrogenbonding networks. It is also used to render images. Chemsktech was used to draw the ligand compounds. Autodock 4.0 [16] is the primary docking program used for the semi-flexible docking studies. Preparation of the ligands and protein receptors in pdbqt file and determination of the grid box size were carried out using Autodock Tools version 1.5.6. Protocol used for performing protein and ligand preparation along with docking studies is described elsewhere [17–19].
Results & Discussion
We have performed the molecular docking studies for twenty compounds with the active binding site of G6PS protein target is completed. The binding energies involved in the protein ligand complex formation is determined. The molecular atomic level of interactions responsible for the target specific binding affinity of the compounds towards G6PS is extracted (Table 1 see supplementary material). The twenty compounds have shown the successful docking inside the active site of G6PS with a binding energy of -7.35 to -9.99 Kcal/mol with predicted IC50 value range of 4.11 micro molar to 47.68 nano molar. We compared the predicted docking data with known G6PS inhibitors such Streptomycin and Glucose-6-phosphate having binding energy of -5.72 and -5.9 Kcal/mol, respectively. Moreover, some other known synthesized compound also show potential antimicrobial activity targeting G6PS with a binding energy range of -4.37 to -9.75 kcal/mol Table 1 (see supplementary material) [20–24]. Compound 9 with binding energy -9.99 Kcal/mol and predicted IC50 value of 47.68 nano molar Table 2 (see supplementary material) for G6PS is found interesting when compared to known compounds. The pi-pi and pi-cationic stacking with Trp74 and His97 residues respectively in this complex is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Docking snapshot of the G6PS in complex with compound 9 (4-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1, 5- benzothiazepine) is shown (a) protein-ligand complex represented in ribbon and stick, respectively; (b) showing binding pocket for the ligand fit with G6PS; (c) 2D representation of the molecular interaction; and (d) 3D representation of the molecular interactions.
Conclusion
G6PS is a known target for anti-bacterial and anti-fungal infections. We present the binding data for 1, 5 Benzothiazepine derivatives with G6PS in this report. This data should be further evaluated using in vitro and in vivo studies for safety, activity, efficacy and toxicity.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank Innovative Informatica Technologies for providing the necessary training and facilities for this work.
Footnotes
Citation:Chennu et al, Bioinformation 11(12): 525-528 (2015)
References
- 1.Durand Philippe, et al. Arch Biochem Biophysics. 2008;474:302. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bearne SL, Blouin C. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:135. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.González-Ibarra J, et al. Med Mycol. 2010;48:110. doi: 10.3109/13693780902856030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mouilleron S, et al. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2011;505:1. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wojciechowski M, et al. Acta Biochim Pol. 2005;52:647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Durand P, et al. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;474:302. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Milewski S, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1597:173. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(02)00318-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vutla Venkata Rao, et al. wjpps. 2014;3:465. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jahangirpuria HD, et al. Der Pharma Chemica. 2013;5:31. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raghavendra KR, et al. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6:590. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bariwal JB, et al. Eur J Med Chem. 2008;43:2279. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Banerjee K, et al. Bioinformation. 2011;7:285. doi: 10.6026/007/97320630007285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Banerjee K, et al. Bioinformation. 2011;7:5. doi: 10.6026/97320630007005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Miszkiel A, et al. J Mol Model. 2011;17:3103. doi: 10.1007/s00894-011-1003-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. http://accelrys.com/products/discoverystudio/ visualization-download.php.
- 16.Goodsell DS, et al. J Mol Recognit. 1996;9:1. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199601)9:1<1::aid-jmr241>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rao, et al. Bioinformation. 2015;11:322. doi: 10.6026/97320630011322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reddy SV, et al. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2015;11:1. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Basha SH, et al. European Journal of Biotechnology and Bioscience. 2014;2:30. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tabassum S, et al. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Preeti Arora, et al. J App Pharm Sci. 2015;5:28. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ivan, et al. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Banerjee, et al. Bioinformation. 2011;7:285. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Balachandran, et al. Appl Nanosci. 2015;5:207. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
