Abstract
Influenza virus RNA (vRNA) promoter panhandle structures are believed to be sensed by retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I). The occurrence of mismatches in this double-stranded RNA structure raises questions about their effect on innate sensing. Our results suggest that mismatches in vRNA promoters decrease binding to RIG-I in vivo, affecting RNA/RIG-I complex formation and preventing RIG-I activation. These results can be inferred to apply to other viruses and suggest that mismatches may represent a general viral strategy to escape RIG-I sensing.
TEXT
Detection of viral infections at the cellular level is crucial for the establishment of an innate immune response. Accordingly, viruses have developed strategies to circumvent this response. They can actively block the pathways involved or prevent the formation of viral molecular patterns sensed by specific cellular receptors, such as retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5, that recognize viral RNA patterns. For RIG-I, this pattern consists of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) structures of various lengths, with 5′ tri- or diphosphate (5′ ppp or 5′ pp, respectively) base-paired ribonucleotides (1, 2). For segmented negative-strand RNA viruses, dsRNA structures are found in panhandles formed by base pairing of conserved and complementary 5′ and 3′ genome ends, which activate RIG-I (3, 4). To avoid detection, viruses have evolved strategies to prevent their formation. Some arenaviruses and bunyaviruses have unusual ways to initiate genome replication, leading to the formation of panhandles with a non-base-paired 5′ pppN overhang or with a 5′ monophosphate end, respectively (5–7). These structures did not activate RIG-I (7, 8) and, in the case of arenaviruses, were seen as a viral decoy strategy to prevent RIG-I activation from bona fide ligands (9).
Influenza virus genome promoters are contained within their mostly complementary genome ends, which can form 5′ ppp blunt-ended dsRNAs with conserved mismatches (see Fig. 1A and 3A). When these promoter sequences are bound to their polymerase, the complementary genome ends cannot form dsRNA, except for a region relatively distant from the 5′ ppp and 3′ OH ends (10, 11). However, a fraction of the influenza virus genome promoters is likely not bound to the polymerase during infection. As residues close to the 5′ ppp blunt end of RNA duplexes are critical for RIG-I ATPase activity (12), the presence of mismatches in influenza virus panhandles raises the possibility that, in addition to their primary role in RNA synthesis, mismatches represent a viral strategy to minimize detection by RIG-I.
To study the effect of these mismatches on RIG-I activation, we designed synthetic dsRNAs based on the H1N1 Taiwan NS segment that mimic the influenza virus panhandles, with or without mismatches (see Fig. 1A and 3A). To obtain a 5′ ppp RNA, the top strand was made in vitro by using a T7 polymerase. For this purpose, the initial AG nucleotides were changed to GG. The length of these panhandle-like structures was extended to 30 bp (see Fig. 1, 2, and 4) to circumvent stability problems and to monitor only the effects of the mismatches. The 5′ ppp RNA made in vitro was used as a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) control, and a dsRNA of 20 bp (20r) known to activate RIG-I was used as a positive control (Fig. 1A). We first studied the binding of these dsRNAs to RIG-I. Pulldown experiments showed that RIG-I binds equally to dsRNAs mimicking influenza virus cRNA panhandle structures with (Cmis.) or without (Cperf.) mismatches (Fig. 1B). Using a different approach, Liu et al. have shown recently that the panhandle structure without mismatches exhibited higher affinities for RIG-I (3). In addition, the presence of mismatches did not influence the ability of RIG-I to form dimers (2 RIG-I) on these dsRNAs, as shown by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) (Fig. 1C, Cperf. and Cmis. versus ssRNA). In EMSA, addition of ATP and MgCl2, which allows RIG-I ATPase activity, had no effect on RIG-I dimerization, as previously observed (12). Interestingly, although these mismatches are positioned in key residues for RIG-I ATPase activity (12), their presence had no effect on RIG-I ATPase activity in vitro, which was higher than that of 20r because of their greater dsRNA length (30 versus 20 bp) (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, when these dsRNAs were tested for the ability to activate the beta interferon (IFN-β) promoter in a luciferase-based reporter gene assay, the presence of mismatches completely abrogated activation (Fig. 1E). Here again, Cperf. was more active than 20r, very likely because of its greater dsRNA length. To rule out the hypothesis of selective RNA degradation, A549 cells engineered to express the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-encoding gene under the control of the IFN-β promoter (13) were transfected with dsRNAs labeled with Cy5-fluorescent CTP. The cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry for GFP expression (IFN-β activation) and Cy5 fluorescence (RNA stability) at 9 and 24 h posttransfection. The results confirmed that, contrary to Cperf., Cmis. did not induce IFN-β under conditions where no difference in Cy5 fluorescence could be detected (Fig. 2A and B), ruling out RNA degradation as an explanation for the lack of IFN induction.
We further tested the effects of individual mismatches (Fig. 3A, Cmis.3 and Cmis.5). As shown in Fig. 1D for the double-mismatch construct (Cmis.), the two single-mismatch dsRNAs induced RIG-I ATPase as efficiently as the perfect dsRNA (Fig. 3B). When tested for the ability to induce the IFN-β promoter in a reporter gene assay, the duplex with the mismatch at position 3 (Cmis.3) exhibited no stimulatory activity, while Cmis.5 retained some stimulatory activity (Fig. 3C, black bars). We have previously shown that IFN-β promoter activation can be enhanced by pretreating cells (priming) with IFN-β (12). Under these conditions, the inactive dsRNAs with single or double mismatches now activated the IFN-β promoter, confirming that these RNAs are not degraded (Fig. 3C, gray bars). The observed increased RIG-I levels upon priming (Fig. 3C) could promote the formation of an active tetrameric RIG-I complex (14), especially for unstable RNA/RIG-I complexes, as seen for dsRNAs shorter than 13 bp (12). When short dsRNAs mimicking the precise length of influenza vRNA panhandles (13 bp) with or without mismatches, G-U bonds, and an AU tail mimicking the loop were used (Fig. 3A, Vperf. and Vmis.), similar results in ATPase activity and RIG-I activation in cells and primed cells were obtained, with the exception of Vmis., which remained inactive even in IFN-primed cells (Fig. 3D and E). Taken together, these results suggested that these mismatches might act by lowering the formation of the RNA/RIG-I complex.
To monitor the formation of the RNA/RIG-I complex, we performed in vivo RNA pulldown experiments after transfection of biotinylated dsRNAs in cells overexpressing RIG-I. Results presented in Fig. 4A show that significantly less RIG-I was found associated with dsRNAs with mismatches than with perfect dsRNAs (65% versus 100%, Fig. 4A). In order to further test this complex formation in vitro, competition assays were performed in RNA pulldown experiments using an excess of nonbiotinylated dsRNAs with (Cmis.) or without (Cperf.) mismatches under conditions where RIG-I ATPase activity and related RNA recycling are allowed (12). Figure 4B shows that more RIG-I is associated with the biotinylated RNA when the competitor has mismatches. This indicates that the rate of RIG-I exchange is lower with a competitor carrying mismatches (50% versus 22% after 6 min of incubation), consistent with lower stability of the RNA/RIG-I complex in this case. As shown in Fig. 4C, the rate of RIG-I exchange and related RNA/RIG-I complex stability is dependent on RIG-I ATPase activity since no exchange is observed in the absence of ATP and MgCl2. In conclusion, mismatches as found in the panhandle structures of segmented negative-strand RNA viruses may prevent RIG-I activation by impairing the formation of stable RNA/RIG-I complexes. As mismatches can be observed in the panhandle structure of other segmented negative-strand viruses (15), the results presented here can be inferred to apply to other viruses and suggest that mismatches could represent a general viral strategy to escape RIG-I sensing.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation grant 31003A_135467.
Thanks to Steve Goodbourn and Richard Randall for providing GFP–IFN-β reporter A549 cells. We also thank Daniel Kolakofsky, Laurent Roux, and Mirco Schmolke for their precious help discussing the project and critically reading the manuscript.
Funding Statement
N/A
REFERENCES
- 1.Schlee M. 2013. Master sensors of pathogenic RNA—RIG-I like receptors. Immunobiology 218:1322–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goubau D, Schlee M, Deddouche S, Pruijssers AJ, Zillinger T, Goldeck M, Schuberth C, Van der Veen AG, Fujimura T, Rehwinkel J, Iskarpatyoti JA, Barchet W, Ludwig J, Dermody TS, Hartmann G, Reis e Sousa C. 2014. Antiviral immunity via RIG-I-mediated recognition of RNA bearing 5′-diphosphates. Nature 514:372–375. doi: 10.1038/nature13590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu G, Park HS, Pyo HM, Liu Q, Zhou Y. 2015. Influenza A virus panhandle structure is directly involved in RIG-I activation and interferon induction. J Virol 89:6067–6079. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00232-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weber M, Gawanbacht A, Habjan M, Rang A, Borner C, Schmidt AM, Veitinger S, Jacob R, Devignot S, Kochs G, Garcia-Sastre A, Weber F. 2013. Incoming RNA virus nucleocapsids containing a 5′-triphosphorylated genome activate RIG-I and antiviral signaling. Cell Host Microbe 13:336–346. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garcin D, Kolakofsky D. 1992. Tacaribe arenavirus RNA synthesis in vitro is primer dependent and suggests an unusual model for the initiation of genome replication. J Virol 66:1370–1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garcin D, Lezzi M, Dobbs M, Elliott RM, Schmaljohn C, Kang CY, Kolakofsky D. 1995. The 5′ ends of Hantaan virus (Bunyaviridae) RNAs suggest a prime-and-realign mechanism for the initiation of RNA synthesis. J Virol 69:5754–5762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Habjan M, Andersson I, Klingstrom J, Schumann M, Martin A, Zimmermann P, Wagner V, Pichlmair A, Schneider U, Muhlberger E, Mirazimi A, Weber F. 2008. Processing of genome 5′ termini as a strategy of negative-strand RNA viruses to avoid RIG-I-dependent interferon induction. PLoS One 3:e2032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marq JB, Kolakofsky D, Garcin D. 2010. Unpaired 5′ ppp-nucleotides, as found in arenavirus double-stranded RNA panhandles, are not recognized by RIG-I. J Biol Chem 285:18208–18216. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.089425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marq JB, Hausmann S, Veillard N, Kolakofsky D, Garcin D. 2011. Short double-stranded RNAs with an overhanging 5′ ppp-nucleotide, as found in arenavirus genomes, act as RIG-I decoys. J Biol Chem 286:6108–6116. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.186262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chang S, Sun D, Liang H, Wang J, Li J, Guo L, Wang X, Guan C, Boruah BM, Yuan L, Feng F, Yang M, Wang L, Wang Y, Wojdyla J, Li L, Wang J, Wang M, Cheng G, Wang HW, Liu Y. 2015. Cryo-EM structure of influenza virus RNA polymerase complex at 4.3 A resolution. Mol Cell 57:925–935. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pflug A, Guilligay D, Reich S, Cusack S. 2014. Structure of influenza A polymerase bound to the viral RNA promoter. Nature 516:355–360. doi: 10.1038/nature14008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anchisi S, Guerra J, Garcin D. 2015. RIG-I ATPase activity and discrimination of self-RNA versus non-self-RNA. mBio 6:e02349. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02349-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen S, Short JA, Young DF, Killip MJ, Schneider M, Goodbourn S, Randall RE. 2010. Heterocellular induction of interferon by negative-sense RNA viruses. Virology 407:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu B, Peisley A, Tetrault D, Li Z, Egelman EH, Magor KE, Walz T, Penczek PA, Hur S. 2014. Molecular imprinting as a signal-activation mechanism of the viral RNA sensor RIG-I. Mol Cell 55:511–523. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weber M, Weber F. 2014. Segmented negative-strand RNA viruses and RIG-I: divide (your genome) and rule. Curr Opin Microbiol 20:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hausmann S, Marq JB, Tapparel C, Kolakofsky D, Garcin D. 2008. RIG-I and dsRNA-induced IFNbeta activation. PLoS One 3:e3965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.King P, Goodbourn S. 1994. The beta-interferon promoter responds to priming through multiple independent regulatory elements. J Biol Chem 269:30609–30615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]