Table 3.
Type of study | Diagnostic accuracy |
Patient acceptability |
Costs | Primary care |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard endoscopy | Population-based cross-sectional | Excellent | Poor | High | No |
Endoscopic brush cytology | Retrospective cohort | Good | Poor | High | No |
EndoCDx | Prospective comparative | Gooda | Poor | High | No |
TNE | Randomized | Excellent | Moderate | High | No |
Office-based TNE | Randomized | Good | Moderate | Moderate | Yes |
Capsule endoscopy | Prospective comparative | Moderate | Moderate | High | Partly |
Single-fiber endoscopy | Animal model | Unknown | Moderate | Unknown | Unknown |
VLE | Small cross-sectional | Unknown | Moderate | Unknown | No |
Cytosponge | Prospective comparative | Gooda | Good | Low | Yes |
Balloon cytology | Prospective comparative | Poor | Moderate | Low | Yes |
Microgrippers | Animal model | Unknown | Good | Unknown | No |
Genetic susceptibility markers (blood) | Genome-wide association studies | Unknown | Excellent | Unknown | Yes |
Stool markers (eg, methylation) | Discovery preclinical | Unknown | Excellent | Unknown | Yes |
Blood markers (eg, proteins, miRNAs) | Discovery preclinical | Unknown | Excellent | Unknown | Yes |
More data are required.