Skip to main content
Thoracic Cancer logoLink to Thoracic Cancer
. 2014 Jul 3;5(4):319–324. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12095

Prognostic factors for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine-platinum as first-line therapy in an observational setting in China

Wenyu Ye 1, Yicheng Yang 1, Jin Wang 1, Zbigniew Kadziola 2, Narayan Rajan 3, Shukui Qin 4,
PMCID: PMC4704354  PMID: 26767019

Abstract

Background

This study examined the prognostic factors associated with survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving gemcitabine-platinum regimens as first-line therapy in real-world clinical settings in China.

Methods

Data was analyzed from a multinational, prospective, non-interventional, observational study of individuals receiving gemcitabine-platinum regimens as first-line therapy for NSCLC, focusing on 300 patients from mainland China. A Cox regression model was used to determine the association of 38 prognostic factors, including patient smoking characteristics, with overall survival.

Results

In these 300 patients, the mean age was 58.9 (±10.8) years, with males comprising 71% of the population. Thirty percent of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 and 70% had a PS of 1. The majority of patients had NSCLC of adenocarcinoma origin (57%). Multivariate Cox regression analyses adjusted for baseline factors revealed that gender, tumor (T) staging, metastasis (M) staging, liver metastases, serum albumin, and superior vena cava obstruction were significant prognostic factors. Smoking during therapy was not significantly associated with survival, although numbers were small for this variable (n = 16). Weight loss of >10% was a significant prognostic factor for adverse events.

Conclusions

Gender, T staging, M staging, liver metastases, superior vena cava obstruction, and serum albumin are prognostic factors affecting overall survival in mainland Chinese patients receiving first-line gemcitabine-platinum regimens for advanced NSCLC. These negative prognostic factors may warrant further investigation in clinical trials.

Keywords: Advanced, gemcitabine, non-small cell lung cancer, platinum, prognostic

Introduction

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a burgeoning problem in China.1 In 2012, approximately 653 000 people were newly diagnosed with lung cancer and 597 000 people died from the disease.2 In China, the most common first-line regimen for patients with late stage (stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC is gemcitabine with either carboplatin or cisplatin.3 Given the common use of gemcitabine-platinum combinations, it is important to evaluate prognostic factors associated with clinical outcomes, as well as current use and treatment patterns in normal practice, to better realize the benefits of prognostic factors in the treatment of NSCLC patients in China.

Many prognostic factors are associated with outcomes in NSCLC, including disease stage, performance status, age, weight loss, gender, and smoking.4,5 We have previously examined prognostic factors, including smoking, in patients receiving gemcitabine-platinum therapy for advanced NSCLC in nine countries, including China, in a single-arm, prospective, non-interventional, observational study.6 In geographically distinct populations, there are differences in a variety of factors that affect outcome and response to treatment, including clinical practice, access to care, and overall genetic variation.7,8 To better understand the prognostic factors that may affect outcomes in Chinese populations, we analyzed data for a subset of mainland Chinese patients from the larger observational study.6 The objective of this study was to use multivariate Cox regression modeling adjusted for patient baseline factors to determine the role of previously identified prognostic factors, including smoking during therapy, on overall survival (OS) and adverse event (AE) profiles in Chinese patients receiving a gemcitabine-platinum regimen as first-line chemotherapy for treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Data source

This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational study that enrolled 300 patients at 40 clinical sites in mainland China as part of a larger (n = 1214), nine-country study (B9E-AA-B004) previously reported.6 Gemcitabine-platinum treatment for the Chinese patients in this study started between 2004 and 2005 and ended between 2004 and 2006. The overall study, as well as this subanalysis, was designed to assess the effect of prognostic factors, including continued smoking during therapy, on treatment outcomes in patients receiving a gemcitabine-platinum regimen as first-line therapy for treatment of advanced NSCLC. Regulatory and ethics requirements were followed for all countries involved in the study, including China. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. All care was provided at the discretion of the treating physician to reflect the routine clinical setting (this included visit frequency, advice regarding smoking behavior, and procedures performed at visits). Patients were followed for survival until death or until 18 months after the start of their gemcitabine-platinum therapy. All patients who received at least one dose of gemcitabine-platinum therapy were included in efficacy and safety analyses unless otherwise noted.

Measures

Many of the prognostic factors analyzed in this study were previously identified as prognostic factors associated with outcomes in NSCLC.4 A total of 38 prognostic factors were examined, including: continued smoking during therapy; number of cigarettes/day during therapy; baseline smoking level; continuing smoker versus ex-smoker; heavy smoker at baseline; never smoked; disease stage; hypercalcemia; tumor node metastasis staging (T, N, and M); weight loss of >10%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status; superior vena cava obstruction present; age <70 years; gemcitabine-platinum regimen; largest tumor >5 cm; gender; metastatic disease (extra-thoracic, liver, bone, brain); diagnosis (histology); dyspnea present; cough present; hemoptysis present; pain present; expectoration present; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease present; pleural effusion present; albumin (normal range indicator); hemoglobin; aspartate aminotransferase; alanine aminotransferase; bilirubin (total); albumin; lactate dehydrogenase; and calcium.

Statistical methods

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess OS (time to death). Survival time was calculated from the start of gemcitabine-platinum therapy to the date of death as a result of any cause. Patients who were lost to follow-up or who were alive at the completion of the study were treated as censored. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between each variable and OS.

A multivariate regression Cox model was built, similar to that reported by Li et al.6 A stepwise Cox regression (with entry and stay cutoff levels of 0.1) was performed using all variables (excluding smoking variables) with <10% missing values. Key prognostic factors identified by Brundage et al.5 were forced into the model. These factors were disease stage, hypercalcemia, “N” factor, weight reduction, performance status, and superior vena cava obstruction. Results from Cox regression analyses are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P-values.

To identify the association between occurrence of AEs and the baseline factors, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. All analyses were performed using the SAS program (Version 9.2, SAS Institute; Cary, NC) with a two-sided alpha of 0.05.

Results

Participant characteristics and treatments

Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. Patients (n = 300) were all mainland Chinese and had a mean (±standard deviation) age of 58.9 (±10.8) years, with males comprising 71% of the population. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status was not available for patients because EGFR mutation analysis was not routine clinical practice at the time of this study.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Variable (N = 300)
Age, years, mean ± standard deviation 58.9 ± 10.8
Performance status (ECOG), n (%)
 0 89 (29.7)
 1 211 (70.3)
Gender, n (%)
 Female 87 (29.0)
 Male 213 (71.0)
Tumor stage, n (%)
 Stage IIIB 134 (44.8)
 Stage IV 165 (55.2)
Brain metastasis, n (%)
 No 286 (95.3)
 Yes 14 (4.7)
Tumor type, n (%)
 Adenocarcinoma 171 (57.0)
 Squamous cell carcinoma of lung 89 (29.7)
 Mixed cell carcinoma of lung 11 (3.7)
 Large cell lung carcinoma 3 (1.0)
 Non-small cell carcinoma NOS 26 (8.7)
Hypercalcemia (calcium >2.75 mmol/L), n (%)
 Yes 4 (1.5)
 No 255 (98.5)
Weight loss >10% during the last 6 months, n (%)
 Yes 50 (16.9)
 No 245 (83.1)
Superior vena caval obstruction at start of therapy, n (%)
 Yes 5 (1.7)
 No 288 (98.3)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at start of therapy, n (%)
 Yes 26 (8.8)
 No 271 (91.2)
Prescribed NSCLC treatment, n (%)
 Gemcitabine-carboplatin 120 (40.0)
 Gemcitabine-cisplatin 180 (60.0)

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; N, total number of patients; n, number of patients in specified category; NOS, not otherwise specified; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Overall, 58.7% of patients had smoked at some point prior to therapy (i.e. ever smokers). Smoking characteristics of patients are shown in Table S1. Nearly two-thirds of ever smokers (64.6%) had ceased smoking at the initiation of therapy or within six months prior to treatment commencement, whereas 5.3% of smokers continued to smoke during therapy. Of those patients continuing to smoke during therapy, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day was 13.2 (95% CI: 7.95, 18.4).

The majority of patients had NSCLC of adenocarcinoma origin (57%). Sixty percent of patients were assigned to gemcitabine-cisplatin treatment, and 40% were assigned to gemcitabine-carboplatin. The mean number of gemcitabine-platinum cycles received was 3.13 (95% CI: 2.98–3.27), with 26% of patients receiving no therapy post gemcitabine-platinum treatment. The most common second-line treatments were docetaxel (19.7%) and radiotherapy (14.3%). Of the 300 patients enrolled, 69 (23%) were alive at study completion, 154 (51.3%) had died, and 77 (25.7%) were lost to follow-up.

Efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-platinum treatment

Median OS time (Fig 1) was 15.6 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.4). Most of the deaths on the study were the result of the study disease (153/154, 99.4%). A total of 94 patients (31.3%) completed the study treatment; 63 patients (21%) discontinued treatment after experiencing an adequate response, 77 patients (25.7%) discontinued because of inadequate response, 40 patients (13.3%) discontinued at their discretion, and seven patients (2.3%) died while on study treatment. Noncompliance was reported as the reason for treatment discontinuation in nine patients (3%). Ten patients (3.3%) discontinued study therapy because of an AE, and 74 patients (24.7%) experienced at least one AE. The most frequently reported AEs were low hemoglobin count (<8.0 g/dL; n = 41, 13.7%), thrombocytopenia (<50.0 × 109/L with bleeding; n = 35, 11.7%), and low neutrophil count (<1.0 × 109/L associated with fever of ≥38.5°C or documented infection; n = 16, 5.3%) (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier overall survival in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.

Table 2.

Adverse event rates as a proportion of patients

Variable Total (N = 300) n (%) (95% CI)
Missing 7 (2.3) (0.9, 4.7)
At least one event 74 (24.7) (19.9, 29.9)
Absolute neutrophil count of <1.0 × 109/L associated with fever of >38.5°C or documented infection 16 (5.3) (3.1, 8.5)
Thrombocytopenia <50.0 × 109/L with bleeding 35 (11.7) (8.3, 15.9)
Hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL (or <80 g/L or <4.9 mmol/L) 41 (13.7) (10.0, 18.1)
Documented infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics 11 (3.7) (1.8, 6.5)
Life-threatening toxicity 1 (0.3) (0.0, 1.8)
None 219 (73.0) (67.6, 77.9)

CI, confidence interval; N, total number of patients; n, number of patients in specified category.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival

Of 38 prognostic factors analyzed, six were found by univariate Cox regression analysis to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with survival, and these were ECOG performance status, T staging, dyspnea, cough, expectoration, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Table 3).

Table 3.

Unadjusted univariate analyses of prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazard modelling

Variables in the model Hazard ratio Lcl for HR Ucl for HR P-value
Age <70 years versus ≥70 years 1.18 0.788 1.78 0.416
Gender 0.826 0.577 1.18 0.297
Performance status 1.46 1.01 2.10 0.044
TNM staging (T) 0.064
 T2 versus T1 4.12 1.49 11.4 0.007
 T3 versus T1 5.52 1.87 16.3 0.002
 T4 versus T1 4.58 1.66 12.6 0.003
 Tx versus T1 6.54 1.45 29.5 0.015
Dyspnea present 1.48 1.06 2.07 0.022
Cough present 1.67 1.14 2.44 0.009
Expectoration present 1.59 1.15 2.19 0.005
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease present 1.85 1.12 3.08 0.017
Metastatic disease-liver 1.59 0.968 2.60 0.067
Continued smoking during therapy 1.11 0.566 2.19 0.755
Number of cigarettes/day during therapy 0.999 0.955 1.04 0.955
Baseline smoking level (pack-years) 0.999 0.994 1.01 0.754
Continuing smoker versus ex-smoker 1.09 0.544 2.18 0.811
Heavy smoker at baseline 1.05 0.744 1.47 0.797
Never smoked 1.08 0.779 1.50 0.648

Selected factors for demographics, statistically significant prognostic factors, and smoking behavior. HR, hazard ratio; Lcl, lower confidence limit; Ucl, upper confidence limit; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Multivariate regression analysis of prognostic factors for survival

HRs and 95% CIs from the multivariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors are illustrated by forest plot in Figure 2. Prognostic factors of T staging, M staging, gender, metastatic disease in the liver, superior vena cava obstruction, and serum albumin were identified as significant (P < 0.05). The smoking variables added to the established model did not reach significance.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Prognostic factors associated with survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of a Chinese patient subgroup (multivariate Cox regression model). CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Analysis of factors associated with adverse events

Logistic regression of AEs after stepwise selection with gender included in the model revealed weight loss >10% to be a significant predictor of AEs (odds ratio = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17–0.97, P < 0.05). After adding the smoking variables into the model, ever smoking and continued smoking were not significant in this logistic regression.

Discussion

NSCLC is estimated to claim nearly 1.4 million lives around the world annually,8 and is the leading cause of cancer death in China.2 Geographic and ethnic differences in cancer incidence and prognosis are increasingly being recognized.911 For example, in the United States, approximately 45% of NSCLC patients are women, whereas in Eastern Asia, only 25–30% of NSCLC patients are female.10,12 In Chinese populations, different prognostic factors have been, and are continuing to be identified that may affect patient therapy and future clinical trials in these populations and geographies.11,12

The current analysis examined the impact of smoking and other prognostic factors in the Chinese subset of patients from a large multi-country, prospective, non-interventional, observational study investigating survival and other treatment outcomes with gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy.6 Prognostic factors in the Chinese subgroup that were significantly associated with decreased OS were male gender, T stage >1, M stage (presence of any metastasis), liver metastases, elevated serum albumin, and superior vena cava obstruction. In addition, expectoration and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were identified as significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis in the mainland Chinese population that were not identified in the larger overall study population.

The prognostic factors identified in the mainland Chinese population differed from those observed in the broader nine-country overall study population from which the Chinese population was derived. For instance, while the specific platinum agent used in combination with gemcitabine was a significant prognostic factor in the overall study, mainland Chinese patients in this study did not have a survival difference based on cisplatin or carboplatin selection in combination with gemcitabine. This may reflect the smaller subset population under study or could be related to some as yet undetermined genetic variation that influences platinum sensitivity in the Chinese population somewhat differently than other populations. Furthermore, whereas ECOG performance status and T stage were prognostic factors for survival in both analyses, dyspnea, cough, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly associated with poorer OS only in the Chinese mainland population, and were not significant predictors in the overall trial population (n = 1214), which comprised eight other countries including Taiwan (n = 195). Dyspnea, cough, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in addition to smoking, may be associated with increased levels of air pollution in large population centers in China.13

Weight loss of >10% was the only prognostic factor associated with the incidence of AEs in the Chinese population, whereas the entire nine-country study population identified five prognostic factors that were associated with the incidence of AEs (i.e. disease stage [IIIB vs. IV], country, weight loss of >10%, age <70 years, and the presence of pain). The difference in the results of the Chinese population may reflect that the current analysis lacked the scope to readily detect such associations, but may also reflect biological differences between these different populations.

The current analysis has several limitations, including the fact that the overarching study was observational, which can be subject to bias and potential confounding. Furthermore, as all of the measurements of effectiveness were subjective, they were not of sufficient scientific rigor to be analyzed as prognostic factors. The relatively small patient subgroup analyzed (n = 300) is another limitation, although this may represent one of the largest analyses to date of Chinese patients receiving chemotherapy for NSCLC in a real-world setting.

Conclusion

In summary, for mainland Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line gemcitabine-platinum doublet therapy in a real-world setting, prognostic factors differed from those found in the larger overall nine-country dataset. Smoking while on therapy did not appear to be a negative prognostic factor for these patients; however, the number of patients continuing to smoke during chemotherapy was small overall, and somewhat less than has been reported in other recent trials in NSCLC. This may reflect the growing effectiveness of smoking cessation programs and greater overall awareness of the link between smoking and lung cancer in China. Male gender, T stage >1, M stage (presence of any metastasis), liver metastases, elevated serum albumin, and superior vena cava obstruction may be poor prognostic factors in mainland Chinese NSCLC patients treated in a real-world setting. These prognostic factors should be considered in future clinical trials of gemcitabine-platinum therapy in this population.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge David Ohannesian, PhD, and Andrew Sakko, PhD, of inVentiv Health Clinical LLC (Indianapolis, IN) for assistance in the writing of the manuscript, and Joseph Durrant of inVentiv Health Clinical LLC for assistance in editing of the manuscript. This study was supported by Eli Lilly and Company.

Disclosure

WY, ZK, NR, YY, and JW are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. SQ has no conflict of interest.

Supporting Information

Table S1 Smoking characteristics at baseline and during study.

tca0005-0319-sd1.docx (20.5KB, docx)

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GLOBOCAN. Lung Cancer: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. [Cited 4 Mar 2014.] Available from URL: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx.
  3. Xue C, Hu Z, Jiang W, et al. National survey of the medical treatment status for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:371–375. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Solan MJ, Werner-Wasik M. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21:64–73. doi: 10.1002/ssu.10023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brundage MD, Davies D, Mackillop WJ. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress. Chest. 2002;122:1037–1057. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.3.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li CT, Marek M, Guclu SZ, et al. Smoking and prognostic factors in an observational setting in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Cancer. 2011;2:52–61. doi: 10.7150/jca.2.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma BB, Hui EP, Mok TS. Population-based differences in treatment outcome following anticancer drug therapies. Lancet. 2010;11:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70160-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. World Health Organization. Cancer. Factsheet number 297, updated February 2014. [Cited 4 Mar 2014.] Available from URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/#.
  9. Chen Z (ed.) 2008. The third national retrospective sampling death survey report by the Ministry of Health. Peking Union Medical College Press, Beijing, China,
  10. Kawaguchi T, Matsumura A, Fukai S, et al. Japanese ethnicity compared with Caucasian ethnicity and never smoking status are independent favorable prognostic factors for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer: a collaborative epidemiologic study of the National Hospital Organization Study Group for Lung Cancer (NHSGLC) in Japan and a Southern California Regional Cancer Registry databases. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1001–1010. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e2f607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhou W, Christiani DC. East meets West: ethnic differences in epidemiology and clinical behaviors of lung cancer between East Asians and Caucasians. Chin J Cancer. 2011;30:287–292. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ahn MJ, Lee J, Park YH, et al. Korean ethnicity as compared with white ethnicity is an independent favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer before and after the oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor era. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1185–1196. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e2f624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fang X, Wang X, Bai C. COPD in China: the burden and importance of proper management. Chest. 2011;139:920–929. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1 Smoking characteristics at baseline and during study.

tca0005-0319-sd1.docx (20.5KB, docx)

Articles from Thoracic Cancer are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES