Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2015 Nov 17;6(1):209–219. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.022970

Mitochondrial–Nuclear Epistasis Impacts Fitness and Mitochondrial Physiology of Interpopulation Caenorhabditis briggsae Hybrids

Chih-Chiun Chang 1, Joel Rodriguez 1, Joseph Ross 1,1
PMCID: PMC4704720  PMID: 26585825

Abstract

In order to identify the earliest genetic changes that precipitate species formation, it is useful to study genetic incompatibilities that cause only mild dysfunction when incompatible alleles are combined in an interpopulation hybrid. Such hybridization within the nematode species Caenorhabditis briggsae has been suggested to result in selection against certain combinations of nuclear and mitochondrial alleles, raising the possibility that mitochondrial–nuclear (mitonuclear) epistasis reduces hybrid fitness. To test this hypothesis, cytoplasmic–nuclear hybrids (cybrids) were created to purposefully disrupt any epistatic interactions. Experimental analysis of the cybrids suggests that mitonuclear discord can result in decreased fecundity, increased lipid content, and increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species levels. Many of these effects were asymmetric with respect to cross direction, as expected if cytoplasmic–nuclear Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities exist. One such effect is consistent with the interpretation that disrupting coevolved mitochondrial and nuclear loci impacts mitochondrial function and organismal fitness. These findings enhance efforts to study the genesis, identity, and maintenance of genetic incompatibilities that precipitate the speciation process.

Keywords: mitonuclear, Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibility, speciation, heteroplasmy, dysfunction


The formation of species is generally thought to depend on a period of reduced mating and gene flow between two populations (Coyne and Orr 2004). Neutral genetic divergence can then arise and be fixed in each population. Any secondary contact and hybridization between the populations could recombine those population-specific alleles, some of which might have negative epistatic interactions that reduce the fitness of the resulting hybrid (Presgraves 2010). Ultimately, the accumulation of such Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities (DMIs, Dobzhansky 1936; Muller 1939; Muller 1940) leads to the formation of biological species (Mayr 1942) once hybrid fitness is altogether eliminated.

A second genetic mechanism that can produce unfit hybrids is the separation of coevolved sets of alleles, often evident as outbreeding depression in highly selfing organisms such as Caenorhabditis nematodes like C. elegans (Dolgin et al. 2007) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (Oakley et al. 2015). Thus, the extent to which neutral (DMI accumulation) and selective (coevolution) genetic processes contribute to the formation of species remains unclear.

Identifying the genetic basis of hybrid dysfunction, and thus speciation, has been challenging, in part because genetic divergence will continue to occur after hybrid fitness is eliminated, and incompatibilities are predicted to accumulate at an increasing rate, the “snowball effect” (Orr 1995). It is often difficult to determine the temporal order in which incompatible alleles arose, and then which alleles were responsible for causing speciation as opposed to reinforcing it (Orr 1995; Maheshwari and Barbash 2011), although efforts using a phylogenetic approach have seen success, e.g., Sherman et al. (2014).

After identifying loci involved in hybrid dysfunction, more work is then necessary to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms producing deleterious phenotypic effects in the hybrid (Presgraves 2010; Cutter 2012). Thus, it should not be surprising that many of the best-described incompatibilities exist in model organisms with extensive molecular and genetic toolkits, like fruit flies, yeast, Arabidopsis, and mice (reviewed in (Maheshwari and Barbash 2011)). However, it has also been argued that a broader range of organisms should be used for studying the genetic basis of speciation, particularly in the case of genomic conflict (Johnson 2010).

One form of conflict that has recently been the focus of a number of studies in a wide variety of taxa occurs between the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Although mitochondria play a vital role in fitness, their genomes do not encode all of the genes whose protein products are deployed in electron transport chain (ETC) complexes, and are essential for oxidative phosphorylation (reviewed in Rand et al. 2004). Instead, many mitochondrial proteins are encoded by genes in the nuclear genome. Because most of the ETC complexes comprise multiple proteins encoded by both genomes, this establishes an opportunity for genomic coevolution. If mitochondrial and nuclear genomes have coevolved to function efficiently together, then mitochondrial function could be reduced in hybrids when hybridization disrupts those coevolved gene complexes (Johnson 2010). At the same time, mitochondrial and nuclear loci are also susceptible to the neutral accumulation of DMIs.

Although the potential involvement of cytoplasmic factors in speciation is an old idea (reviewed in (Orr 1996)), many recent studies have rekindled interest in the notion that mitochondrial genomes might play a major role in speciation (Gershoni et al. 2009; Burton and Barreto 2012). Cases of mitonuclear epistasis are useful for studying the genetic basis of hybrid dysfunction, and thus potentially speciation. Identifying hybrids in which negative mitonuclear epistatic interactions cause mild hybrid dysfunction would also potentially avoid issues with the snowball effect (Presgraves 2010).

The empirical identification of such cases can be sporadic. Recent cases often initially identified the potential for mitonuclear epistasis by observing marker transmission ratio distortion (MTRD) specific to one cross direction when working with hybrid crosses, e.g., (McDaniel et al. 2007; Corbett-Detig et al. 2013; Leppala et al. 2013). Our previous work in interpopulation (AF16-HK104) hybrids of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae also revealed patterns of MTRD that depended on cross direction, suggesting the possibility of mitonuclear epistasis occurring in C. briggsae populations (Ross et al. 2011). AF16 [a tropical clade strain from India (Fodor et al. 1983)] and HK104 (a temperate clade strain from Japan) are two wild isolate populations used routinely in C. briggsae genetics. As a primarily selfing species, genetic variants might fix quickly within C. briggsae populations, and so strains like AF16 and HK104 tend to be almost or completely homozygous throughout the nuclear genome. These two populations exhibit substantial genetic divergence, with nucleotide substitutions occurring on average every 163 bp (Koboldt et al. 2010), and also show some evidence of mild hybrid dysfunction, including an increase in hybrid embryonic lethality and hybrid development rate (Dolgin et al. 2008; Ross et al. 2011; Baird and Stonesifer 2012). Thus, the combination in C. briggsae of population structure (Thomas et al. 2015), interpopulation genetic divergence, and evidence of potential mitonuclear epistasis, produces strong potential for identifying the genetic basis of intraspecies hybrid dysfunction. Such work in C. briggsae also benefits from its rich suite of genetic and molecular tools (Baird and Chamberlin 2006; Gupta et al. 2007; Koboldt et al. 2010; Zhao et al. 2010).

The first step toward identifying the genetic basis of AF16-HK104 hybrid dysfunction is to determine whether mitonuclear epistasis exists. Deleterious effects of hybridization on fitness resulting from mitonuclear epistatic interactions have been recently described in a number of species. Together, these studies have established requirements for demonstrating that mitonuclear epistasis causes interpopulation hybrid dysfunction (e.g., Breeuwer and Werren 1995; Tiffin et al. 2001; Levin 2003; Sackton et al. 2003; Bolnick and Near 2005; Zeyl et al. 2005; Ellison and Burton 2006; Fishman and Willis 2006; Dowling et al. 2007; Ellison and Burton 2008a, 2008b; Ellison et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2008; Niehuis et al. 2008; Gagnaire et al. 2012; Gibson et al. 2013; Hoekstra et al. 2013; Meiklejohn et al. 2013; Gershoni et al. 2014).

First, genetic variation must exist between the nuclear genomes and the mitochondrial genomes of the two populations. Second, production of cytoplasmic–nuclear hybrids (cybrids) is essential. A cybrid combines the nuclear genome of one population with the mitochondrial genome of the other. If any individual genotype will elicit dysfunction because of the separation of coevolved mitochondrial and nuclear alleles, this is the one. In the presence of negative mitonuclear epistasis that elicits hybrid dysfunction, cybrids are expected to exhibit reduced mitochondrial function and reduced fitness compared to the parental strains. Any phenotypic differences between a cybrid and its paternal parental population (nuclear genome donor) can be attributed to having replaced one mitotype with the other. This comparison rules out the possibility of confounding nuclear–nuclear epistatic interactions that might exist between the parental strains.

In the present study, we experimentally tested the hypothesis that the AF16 and HK104 populations contain mitochondrial and nuclear alleles that negatively interact to produce dysfunctional hybrids. The presence of asymmetric effects of cybridization suggests the accumulation of mitochondrial–nuclear DMIs, while an observed symmetrical effect could be due either to the presence of multiple DMIs or to separation of coevolved mitonuclear loci (Turelli and Orr 2000; Turelli and Moyle 2007). Distinguishing these possibilities is a future goal. Together, these cybrid phenotypes suggest that AF16 and HK104 might occupy an early state of speciation. Our findings support the hypothesis that mitonuclear epistasis exists in C. briggsae and promote the use of C. briggsae to study the genetic basis of hybrid dysfunction and speciation.

Materials and Methods

Nematode husbandry

C. briggsae AF16 and HK104 strains were initially obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center. Strain maintenance and storage were performed as described (Stiernagle 2006). Worms were maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) agar plates, fed the OP50 strain of Escherichia coli, and grown at 20.0°. All experiments were performed on young adult individuals (within 24 hr following the L4/adult molt) derived from populations that had been maintained for at least two generations with food ad libitum.

Sequence analysis

The mitochondrial genome sequences of C. briggsae wild isolates AF16 and HK104 were obtained from GenBank (accessions AC186293 and EU40779). Comparison of translated mitochondrial coding regions was performed using ClustalW and the PAM250 matrix (Larkin et al. 2007).

Cybrid production

C. briggsae, like its close relative C. elegans, comprises individuals of two sexes: males and self-fertile hermaphrodites (Gupta et al. 2007). Cytoplasmic–nuclear hybrids (cybrids) were created using the cross scheme shown in Figure 1. Cybrids were produced in both cross directions, using either one HK104 self-sperm-depleted hermaphrodite mated to AF16 males, or an AF16 self-sperm-depleted hermaphrodite mated to HK104 males in the P0 generation. A single F1 hybrid hermaphrodite for each line was then self-sperm-depleted, and backcrossed to additional males from the same strain as the P0 generation males. Replicate lines for each cross direction were established at the F1 generation and subsequently backcrossed separately through a single sperm-depleted hermaphrodite per generation, with the goal of establishing three replicate cybrid lines per cross direction. However, during the serial backcross, one line established by the P0 cross AF16 male x HK104 hermaphrodite was lost because of absence of oocyte production following self-sperm depletion in an advanced generation of the cross. Thus, two cybrid replicate lines with P0 AF16 fathers and HK104 mothers (strains CP129 and CP130), and three replicates (CP131–CP133) with P0 HK104 fathers and AF16 mothers were produced. From the F1, backcrossing was repeated for nine generations to generate B10 cybrids.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cross scheme for producing cytoplasmic–nuclear hybrids (cybrids). In the P0 generation, a self-sperm-depleted AF16 (gray alleles) hermaphrodite with diploid nuclear genome (an example autosome pair, A, shown, in the nucleus, rounded rectangle), and mitochondrial genome (a representative circular genome, mt) is crossed to an HK104 (black alleles) male. This cross produces an F1 hybrid individual with an entirely heterozygous nuclear genome, and maternally (hermaphroditically)-inherited mitochondrial haplotype. Backcrossing the self-sperm-depleted F1 hermaphrodite to another male from the P0 paternal strain produces the first backcross (B1) generation, and begins to introgress the paternal (HK104) nuclear genome onto the maternal (AF16) cytoplasm. Ten generations of backcrossing produces B10 cybrids. The nuclear genome should be homozygous for P0 paternal (HK104) alleles, while maternal inheritance of cytoplasm should produce a cybrid with AF16 mitochondria. The cross shown produced cybrid replicates CP131, 132 and 133. The reciprocal cross (P0 HK104 hermaphrodite and AF16 male; serial backcross of hybrid hermaphrodites to AF16 males) produced replicates CP129 and CP130.

Genotyping

To establish that the expected genotypes were obtained after the cybrid cross scheme, each line was genotyped at one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) per nuclear chromosome and one SNP in the mitochondrial genome, an approach used in the evaluation of C. briggsae cybrid genotypes in Hicks et al. (2012). Insertion-deletion (indel) markers (Table 1 and Supporting Information, Figure S1) that distinguish AF16 and HK104 alleles were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using published primer sequences (Koboldt et al. 2010).

Table 1. Observed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes of parental and cybrid lines.

SNP Chr Mbp AF16 HK104 CP129 CP130 CP131 CP132 CP133
Cb-m26 II 11.867 A H A A H H H
Cb-m154 III 2.166 A H A A H H H
Cb-m205 III 5.649 A H A A H H H
Cb-m172 IV 10.305 A H A A H H H
Cb-m74 IV 15.657 A H A A H H H
Cb-m103 V 11.376 A H A A H H H
Cb-m124 X 12.616 A H A A H H H
cb18178 mt A H H H A H A

Seven strains (wild isolates AF16 and HK104, and five cybrids: CP129–CP133) were genotyped at the eight SNPs listed. Columns contain the name of each SNP (Koboldt et al. 2010; Ross et al. 2011), the chromosome (Chr) it is located on [autosomes I, II, III, IV, V; the X chromosome, or the mitochondrial (mt) genome], and its position in Mbp on that chromosome (assembly cb4). The remaining columns list the genotype of each strain at each SNP. For the diploid nuclear loci: homozygous AF16/AF16 alleles (A), homozygous HK104/HK104 alleles (H). No heterozygous genotypes were identified. Because all of the genotyping assays for the mitochondrial locus appeared to reveal homoplasmy, a single allele (A, AF16 homoplasmy; H, HK104 homoplasmy) is listed.

The AF16-HK104 SNP cb18178 was previously determined to be located in the mitochondrial genome (Ross et al. 2011). Alignment of the mitochondrial genome sequences of AF16 and HK104 (GenBank accessions AC186293 and EU407793.1) identified that cb18178 acts as a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) marker, causing differential presence of a SexAI restriction site. PCR amplification from the AF16 and HK104 mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) is predicted to produce a 798-bp amplicon at cb18178. SexAI should not digest the amplicon from AF16; digest of the HK104 allele is expected to result in 164 and 633 bp products. Forward and reverse PCR primers CACTTACAATGATAGGGTTTAAAATTC and CCATTTCTGCGAAAAAGAAAC were designed to amplify cb18178 from the mitochondrial genomes of both strains. All amplifications occurred in a Bio-Rad T100 thermal cycler using the following cycle sequence: 95° 2 min, 30 cycles of 95° 1 min, 45° 1 min, 72° 2 min, followed by a final 72° 5 min extension, and subsequently stored at 4°. After amplification, cb18178 amplicons were digested using restriction endonuclease SexAI (New England Biolabs) using the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. All amplicons were separated electrophoretically on 1% agarose gels in 1x TRIS-acetate EDTA buffer containing 2 µg/mL ethidium bromide. Micrographs of gels were obtained using an AlphaImager HP system (Alpha Innotech).

Mitochondrial heteroplasmy genotyping

The presence and relative amount of mitochondrial heteroplasmy for a recurring deletion in the ND5 gene (ND5∆) was assessed in purified genomic DNA extracts by PCR as above with the following change: the primers used to amplify the ND5 locus were CbMt_1F and 58R (Howe and Denver 2008). Quantification of the relative amounts of intact and ND5∆ amplicons was performed by micrograph densitometry of the ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel using ImageJ (Rasband 1997–2015). The percent of ND5∆ heteroplasmy for each sample was calculated from the ratio of the integrated pixel density values of the ND5∆ amplicon to the sum of the ND5∆ and intact amplicon integrated density values.

Cybrid phenotyping and statistical comparison

As is convention in the literature for analysis of cybrid phenotypes (e.g., Sackton et al. 2003; Ellison and Burton 2006; Ellison et al. 2008; Hicks et al. 2012), we first combined data from independent experimental and biological replicates and then compared each cybrid cross direction to its paternal parental population. That is, all data from all experimental replicates of both cybrid strains with AF16 nuclear and HK104 mitochondrial genotypes (CP129 and CP130, the biological replicates) were combined and then compared to AF16; all CP131 and CP133 cybrid data (HK104 nuclear and AF16 mitochondrial genotypes) were combined and then compared to HK104. Statistical differences were assessed using two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test for samples with unequal variances with a significance threshold of P = 0.05 after Bonferroni correction.

Fecundity measurement

To measure the number of viable self-offspring produced by an individual hermaphrodite, animals were isolated onto agar plates as larvae; each animal was moved to a new plate daily from the onset of offspring production until the cessation of self-fertility. Three days after the adult hermaphrodite was removed from a plate, the number of living offspring on that plate was manually tallied.

Reactive oxygen species measurement

In vivo measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in individual nematodes was performed as described Dingley et al. (2010) with modifications. All work was performed in the darkest conditions possible. Briefly, MitoSOX Red (Invitrogen) was reconstituted to 1 mg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and then diluted 3.29-fold in S basal medium; 130.4 µl of this MitoSOX Red solution was added to the OP50 lawn on a 4 ml (35-mm diameter) NGM plate. A DMSO/S basal-only plate was prepared as a negative control. The following day, individual worms from each strain (cybrid as well as parental control) were transferred onto both types of plates, where they ingested OP50 along with either MitoSOX dye or vehicle. After 24 hr, the worms were transferred onto NGM plates with unlabeled OP50 for 1 hr to clear their digestive tracts of labeled bacteria. Worms were then transferred onto 1% agarose pads on microscope slides in 10 µl of 50 mM levamisole in M9 buffer, and a coverslip was added. Differential interference contrast (DIC), and fluorescence micrographs of the anterior of each worm were captured through a 40x PLAN-NEUFLUAR objective on a Zeiss Axioimager.A1 compound microscope using an Axiocam mRm and Axiovision 4.8 software. Zeiss filter set 20 (BP 546/12, FT 560, BP 575-640) was used with an X-cite series 120Q (Excelitas) light source for fluorescence microscopy.

MitoSOX Red fluorescence was then quantitated using ImageJ (Rasband 1997–2015). The terminal pharyngeal bulb of each individual was manually encircled in the DIC image of a worm; the integrated pixel density of that region was then obtained from the corresponding fluorescent image (Figure 2). Background autofluorescence was estimated as the average fluorescence of all individuals on the vehicle treatment plate; this value was subtracted from the integrated density measurement of each MitoSOX Red-treated worm. To account for possible instrument drift across multiple days, background-corrected fluorescence values for all strains were normalized so that the individual worm with the highest fluorescence reading in each experimental session had a relative fluorescence measurement of 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MitoSOX Red fluorescence quantitation in the nematode pharynx. A) DIC micrograph (40x objective) of the anterior of a C. briggsae adult individual. B) MitoSOX Red fluorescence overlay in the pharyngeal bulb of the same individual.

Lipid content measurement

In vivo measurement of lipid content was performed by staining using the lipophilic fluorescent dye Nile red (Sigma) following van den Ecker et al. (2012) with the following modifications. Young adults were transferred to NGM plates that had been prepared by pipetting 0.25 ml Nile red solution (100 ng/ml in acetone) onto the OP50 lawn, and letting the plate incubate for 24 hr. Nematodes ingested the dye together with OP50 for 24 hr and were then moved to unlabeled OP50 on NGM plates for an additional 24 hr to clear the digestive tract of Nile red. Control individuals were treated identically, except that they were only exposed to vehicle. Worms were then mounted and micrographs obtained as above for ROS phenotyping. Fluorescence was quantified as the difference between raw integrated density of whole-body fluorescence of experimental individuals, and background fluorescence measurements from control individuals using ImageJ (Rasband 1997–2015).

Data availability

Strains CP129–CP133 are available upon request.

Results

Mitochondrial genomic variation in C. briggsae

To assess the potential for mitonuclear coevolution in AF16 and HK104, their mitochondrial genome sequences were aligned. Comparison of mitochondria-encoded electron transport genes from AF16 and HK104 (Table 2) reveals that two of the 12 genes analyzed are identical in amino acid sequence in both wild isolates. The other 10 have percent similarities ranging from 99.5 to 97.4. Seven of those 10 have at least one dissimilar amino acid substitution.

Table 2. Comparison of amino acid similarity in the protein-coding genes of the AF16 and HK104 mitochondrial genomes.

ETC Gene S W %
I ND6 2 0 1 97.9
I ND4L 1 0 1 97.4
I ND1 3 0 1 98.6
V ATP6 1 0 0 99.5
I ND2 2 3 0 98.6
III CTB 1 2 1 98.9
IV CO3 0 0 0 100.0
I ND4 3 1 2 98.5
IV CO1 1 0 2 99.4
IV CO2 0 0 0 100.0
I ND3 1 0 0 99.1
I ND5 2 3 1 98.9

Columns provide: the electron transport chain (ETC) complex to which each gene belongs [ND, NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase; CTB, cytochrome B; CO, cytochrome c oxidase, nomenclature following (Lemire 2005)], the number of strongly similar substitutions (S, Gonnet PAM250 matrix score > 0.5), weakly similar substitutions (W, score 0–0.5), or dissimilar substitutions (–, negative score), and the protein percent similarity (%). Genes are arranged in order of their position in the C. briggsae mitochondrial genome

Cybrid genotypes

The two cybrid replicate strains with AF16 as the male (nuclear donor) parent and HK104 as the hermaphrodite (mitochondrial donor) parent (CP129 and CP130), and three strains with HK104 as the male parent and AF16 as the hermaphrodite parent (CP131–CP133), were genotyped to confirm the success of the cybrid cross scheme (Table 1 and Figure S1). The two cybrids (CP129 and CP130) whose F1 hybrid ancestor was repeatedly backcrossed to HK104 males were homozygous for HK104 alleles at each nuclear locus tested. The three cybrids (CP131–CP133) whose F1 hybrid ancestor was repeatedly backcrossed to AF16 males were homozygous for AF16 alleles at each nuclear locus tested.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of the SexAI-digested cb18178 PCR amplicons from AF16, HK104, and the five cybrid lines revealed the mitochondrial genotypes of the five cybrids (Figure 3). The AF16 amplicon is ∼800 bp in size before digest. Addition of SexAI to these AF16 amplicons results in no digestion product. The HK104 amplicons digest completely, as expected for HK104 alleles. Amplicons from strains CP129, CP130, and CP132 digest to completion; strains CP131 and CP133 do not show any visible evidence of digestion product.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mitochondrial RFLP genotyping assay. The cb18178 SNP (upper black arrow) eliminates a SexAI restriction endonuclease site (underlined) in the AF16 mitochondrial genome. An initial PCR amplicon of 798 bp should be produced (SexAI –, left half of gel) from either mitochondrial haplotype (AF16 or HK104). Subsequent addition of SexAI (+, right half of gel) should result in digest products of 634 bp (shown) and 164 bp (not shown) only from HK104 alleles. DNA template sources are listed above each lane; M: 100 bp molecular weight marker. Interpretations of observed genotypes are listed underneath the digested lanes (H: HK104 homoplasmy; A: AF16 homoplasmy). Expectations are based on maternal inheritance of mitochondria and the cross design used to produce each cybrid (Figure 1).

Upon amplification of purified genomic DNA from AF16, HK104, and the five cybrid replicates using primers flanking a common heteroplasmic mitochondrial genome deletion (Howe and Denver 2008), amplicons representing intact and ND5∆ mitotypes were generated (Figure 4). The levels of ND5∆ in AF16 and HK104 were 33.6% and 33.8%, respectively. ND5∆ heteroplasmy in the cybrids ranged from 25.0% to 33.2%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Assessment of mitochondrial heteroplasmy for ND5. PCR amplification of the ND5 locus with primers that flank a commonly occurring deletion (ND5∆) produces two amplicons: the shorter deletion-bearing product (∼800 bp) and the intact product (∼1700 bp) (Howe and Denver 2008). The percent of these amplicons represented by ND5∆ products is shown beneath the agarose gel image for the parental strains, five cybrids, and a negative (water) control. M: molecular weight ladders (100 bp on left; 1 kbp on right).

Because the mitochondrial genotype of CP132 disagreed with expectation, CP132 was omitted from further experiments.

Cybrid fecundity

To identify the effect of genotype on organismal phenotype, the number of hermaphrodite self-progeny surviving to adulthood (self-brood size) was determined for the parental strains AF16 and HK104, and for the cybrid strains CP129 and CP130 (AF16 nuclear and HK104 mitochondrial genotypes), and CP131 and CP133 (HK104 nuclear and AF16 mitochondrial genotypes). Comparison of AF16(nuc); HK104(mt) to the fecundity of wild-type AF16 revealed a significant decrease in cybrid fecundity in this hybrid cross direction (P < 0.05) (Figure 5 and Table S1). There was no significant difference between HK104(nuc); AF16(mt) cybrids and HK104.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of parental and cybrid fecundity. Boxplot of the fecundities of the two P0 parental strains (AF16 and HK104) and the cybrids. The cybrids with AF16 nuclear and HK104 mitochondrial genotypes exhibit significantly lower fecundity than AF16 (*P < 0.05, n.s. not significant; Bonferroni-corrected unpaired two-tailed t-test).

Cybrid ROS

In vivo ROS levels were measured in cybrid and parental strains by quantifying the fluorescence of ingested MitoSOX Red mitochondrial superoxide indicator (Figure 6 and Table S2). AF16(nuc); HK104(mt) cybrid ROS levels are increased compared to AF16, but HK104(nuc); AF16(mt) cybrid ROS levels do not differ from HK104. As a positive control, the addition of paraquat to the nematode medium significantly increased detected ROS levels in every strain. Even in the presence of paraquat, the AF16(nuc); HK104(mt) cybrids maintained a significant increase of in vivo ROS compared to AF16, and the HK104(nuc); AF16(mt) cybrids still demonstrated no significant difference from HK104.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of parental and cybrid reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Boxplot of in vivo ROS measured by MitoSOX Red fluorescence. Horizontal brackets within the plot denote four statistical comparisons made between cybrids and their P0 paternal strains (*P < 0.05, n.s. not significant; Bonferroni-corrected unpaired two-tailed t-test). The cybrids with AF16 nuclear and HK104 mitochondrial genotypes exhibit significantly higher ROS levels than AF16 both in the absence (–) and the presence (+) of ROS-inducing paraquat. For every strain, the presence of paraquat significantly increases ROS levels (four horizontal brackets beneath the plot). Different thicknesses of the lines denoting statistical comparisons are for clarity.

Cybrid lipid content

Quantification of in vivo Nile Red fluorescence in parental and cybrid strains revealed a statistically significant increase in whole-body lipid content in both cybrid cross directions compared to the paternal parental strains (Figure 7 and Table S3).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of parental and cybrid lipid content. Boxplot of whole-animal lipid content measured by Nile red fluorescence. Comparisons between replicate cybrids and the paternal parental strain revealed significant increases in lipid content in cybrids (*P < 0.05; Bonferroni-corrected unpaired two-tailed t-test).

Discussion

The possibility of mitonuclear epistasis in C. briggsae was first suggested by asymmetric patterns of MTRD in reciprocal hybrid crosses (Ross et al. 2011). In hybrids of other species, MTRD specific to one cross direction had previously been reported to result from mitonuclear epistasis (McDaniel et al. 2007; Niehuis et al. 2008) and to overlap quantitative trait loci for hybrid incompatibility (Moyle and Graham 2006). We therefore asked whether mitonuclear genetic incompatibility has arisen between the C. briggsae wild isolates AF16 and HK104. By creating, genotyping, and phenotyping replicate cybrids, we have shown that cybrids have reduced fitness and altered mitochondrial physiology. Thus, C. briggsae AF16-HK104 cybrids display the characteristics of negative mitonuclear epistasis.

Mitochondrial sequence variation

In order to invoke negative mitonuclear epistasis as an explanation for the observed cybrid dysfunction, the parental strains should exhibit genomic divergence. The AF16 and HK104 mitochondrial genomes are 98% identical. In yeast, mitochondrial genomes with >98% sequence identity are unable to substitute effectively for each other (Zeyl et al. 2005; Wei et al. 2007). In Tigriopus copepods, hybrids that suffer from mitochondrial dysfunction have mitochondrial genome-encoded cytochrome oxidase I sequences whose divergence exceeds 15% (Ellison and Burton 2006). In Drosophila simulans, <0.1% divergence in mitochondrial genomes is sufficient to produce negative mitonuclear epistasis (Meiklejohn et al. 2013). It has also been suggested, in response to the advent of three-parent fertilization to avoid maternal transmission of pathogenic mitochondrial mutations (Callaway 2014), that the degree of genetic variation in human genomes puts individuals engineered by mitochondrial replacement at risk for negative mitonuclear incompatibilities (Morrow et al. 2015). Thus, the amount of mitochondrial genome divergence between AF16 and HK104 falls in the range of divergence that has been shown to sustain negative mitonuclear epistasis.

We also specifically assessed whether any of the sequence divergence in AF16 and HK104 mitochondria might cause nonsynonymous changes to proteins. The presence of nonsynonymous substitutions in mitochondrial genomes had been previously noted for temperate strains (Howe and Denver 2008), and the mitochondrial genomes of some populations sustain large heteroplasmic deletions that are expected to negatively impact fitness (Howe and Denver 2008; Howe et al. 2010; Estes et al. 2011). We found that seven of the 12 mitochondrial-encoded electron transport chain genes contain nonsynonymous substitutions (Table 2) with divergence levels in accord with the genome-wide value. Thus, the mitochondrial protein-coding divergence could provide a substrate for negative mitonuclear epistasis. However, no molecular evolutionary data yet support the hypothesis of positive selection in C. briggsae mitochondrial-encoded ETC components (Howe and Denver 2008); such a finding would suggest the potential for mitonuclear coevolution. No such analysis has yet been performed for the C. briggsae nuclear-encoded mitochondrial-acting genes (Hicks et al. 2012).

Beyond oxidative phosphorylation, many other opportunities exist for epistasis between the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Mitochondria integrate signals controlling lipid metabolism, apoptosis, development rate, and cell cycle control. Thus, although much research focus has been placed on understanding mitonuclear interactions impacting oxidative phosphorylation, other forms of mitonuclear epistasis could impact fitness. Not only might epistatic interactions involve numerous candidate nuclear loci beyond the ETC genes, but also they potentially involve variation in noncoding regions (e.g., Nam and Kang 2001; Karlok et al. 2002; Ellison and Burton 2008a; Meiklejohn et al. 2013). Likewise, mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis between the human X-linked gene KAL1 and mitochondrial tRNAcys results in Kallmann syndrome (Wang et al. 2015). Future efforts in the field should incorporate a wider perspective on the potential genetic basis of mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis.

Cybrid production and genotyping

To test the hypothesis that mitonuclear epistasis has a deleterious effect on AF16-HK104 hybrids, we created reciprocal and replicate cybrids. Serial backcrosses of F1 hybrids to males from the P0 paternal population were employed to eventually return the nuclear genotype to homozygosity for the P0 paternal alleles while maintaining the P0 maternal mitochondrial haplotype by maternal cytoplasmic inheritance (Figure 1), which occurs in Caenorhabditis (Lemire 2005) and which has also been shown to be true for serial backcrosses in mouse, for example Gyllensten et al. (1985). Table 1 summarizes the cybrid genotype data. For each nuclear locus tested, CP129 and CP130 were homozygous for AF16 alleles and CP131–CP133 were homozygous for HK104 alleles, as expected.

Mitochondrial inheritance in C. briggsae hybrids

We next identified the mitochondrial haplotypes of the cybrid lines using an RFLP genotyping assay (Figure 3). Absence of digest product in the AF16 lane, and complete digest of amplicons in the HK104 lane, indicates that both parental strains are homoplasmic for their respective mitochondrial haplotypes, eliminating the possibility of heteroplasmy at the onset of our crosses (Howe and Denver 2008; Estes et al. 2011).

For all but one of the strains, the mitochondrial genotype was consistent with the cybrid cross design. All CP132 amplicons are digested in the presence of SexAI, indicating that CP132 is homoplasmic for HK104 mitochondria. Similar mitotype results were also obtained for CP132 using a different RFLP assay (not shown). This result is remarkable, considering that no HK104 hermaphrodites (and thus no maternal source of HK104 mitotypes) were employed in the ten generations of crossing used to produce CP132.

Two notable implications of this finding are i) that paternal mitochondrial transmission occurred, and ii) that the resulting heteroplasmy for AF16 and HK104 mitochondria that must initially have existed following paternal transmission was rapidly and completely resolved in favor of transmission of HK104 mitochondria, producing a cybrid line apparently homoplasmous for HK104 mitochondria within 10 generations.

It is possible that AF16 mitochondrial genomes do remain in low relative copy number that is not detectable by eye (Figure 3). Comparison of qualitative PCR (qPCR) and PCR results for C. briggsae mitochondria suggests that a conservative estimate of the limit of detection of heteroplasmy by PCR is at least as low as 5% (Howe and Denver 2008). Further, because the cb18178 RFLP assay digests only HK104 mitochondrial amplicons, incomplete digest, absence or inactivity of restriction endonuclease, or other related technical artifacts cannot explain this unexpected result. To ensure that amplification by the cb18178 primer is not biased toward one mitotype, the primer sequences were aligned to the AF16 and HK104 mitochondrial genome assemblies. The primers are identical to the AF16 mitotype; one SNP exists between the forward primer and the HK104 mitotype. As such, it is also unlikely that biased amplification of HK104 mitotypes explains the CP132 RFLP data.

A similar result of paternal mitochondrial transmission after hybridization of different C. briggsae parental strains has also been reported (Hicks et al. 2012), raising the distinct possibility that some male mitochondrial transmission occurs at fertilization in C. briggsae hybrids. This interpretation is in accordance with findings from C. elegans (Al Rawi et al. 2011; Sato and Sato 2011). In sum, we conclude it is unlikely that the anomalous mitotype of CP132 is due to experimental artifact. Because of the discrepancy between the expected and observed mitotype of CP132, it was subsequently omitted from all phenotypic analyses reported here.

Cybrid ROS production

If existing mitochondrial nucleotide variation in AF16 negatively interacts with nuclear variants in HK104, or vice versa, then the production of cybrids might result in ETC dysfunction. ROS are produced as a byproduct of oxidative phosphorylation (Nohl and Hegner 1978; Nohl 1986), and tend to increase because of inefficient electron transport resulting from mitochondrial DNA damage. Mitochondrial dysfunction resulting from negative mitonuclear epistasis might be evident as an increase in ROS production by cybrids. Many C. elegans ETC mutants produce increased ROS levels (Dingley et al. 2010), although ROS levels in C. briggsae populations have not found to correlate linearly with the population frequencies of specific mitochondrial genetic variants (Estes et al. 2011; Hicks et al. 2012).

Our cybrid phenotyping revealed that combining HK104 mitochondria with the AF16 nuclear genome, but not vice versa, increases in vivo mitochondrial ROS levels (Figure 6). The asymmetry seen in the ROS level phenotype suggests the presence of a mitonuclear DMI between the HK104 mitochondrial and AF16 nuclear genomes. These results reveal the impact of mitochondrial genotype on mitochondrial phenotype: replacing the mitochondrial genome with another mitotype from a different population results in an increase in ROS levels. This interpretation is consistent with a prior conclusion that a genetic effect on ROS production exists in cybrids between AF16 and a third strain, HK105 (Hicks et al. 2012). The mitochondrial genetic effect on ROS production we observe in cybrids is consistent across conditions (both in the presence and absence of paraquat, Figure 6). However, it should be noted that we are yet unable to distinguish whether an increase in ROS level might be due to decreased efficiency of ROS scavenging (e.g., by superoxide dismutase) and/or increased production of ROS (Turrens 2003; Estes et al. 2011).

Cybrid lipid content

Studies in Caenorhabditis and in humans with mitochondrial myopathies have suggested the possibility that altered mitochondrial function impacts lipid storage (Bonilla and Prelle 1987; Kimura et al. 1997; Chow and Thorburn 2000; Mak et al. 2006; Mailloux et al. 2007; Jones et al. 2009; Soukas et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2014). Thus, we stained parental strains and cybrids with Nile red to quantitate and compare whole-individual lipid content. Both cybrid cross directions resulted in a statistically significant increase in lipid content (Figure 7), further supporting the interpretation that negative epistatic interactions in cybrids impact mitochondrial function.

The symmetry of the effect of mitotype on cybrid lipid content suggests that AF16 mitochondria are incompatible with an HK104 nuclear allele; HK104 mitochondria are incompatible with an AF16 nuclear allele. Two mechanisms potentially cause such a result. First, independent DMIs might have arisen in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes of each population, such that both cybrid cross directions result in the same phenotypic effect (increased lipid content). This explanation is related to the idea that the existence of multiple DMIs is also predicted to produce more symmetrical effects (Turelli and Moyle 2007). Thus, the presence of a symmetrical effect does not necessarily rule out the existence of DMIs (Turelli and Orr 2000). Second, if mitochondrial–nuclear coevolution has occurred in both populations, then the prediction is that a cybrid resulting from either cross direction would separate that optimal epistatic pair, resulting in a phenotypic effect. For lipid content, we are currently unable to distinguish between the multiple-DMI and the coevolution explanations. Nevertheless, the lipid content data do support the existence of mitochondrial–nuclear epistasis between AF16 and HK104.

Cybrid fecundity

After observing that mitochondrial physiology is altered in cybrid lines, we sought to identify an organismal phenotype that might correlate mitochondrial function with fitness. The impact of mitochondrial DNA variation on fitness has been recognized (Gemmell et al. 2004), and we reasoned that mitochondrial dysfunction might be evident as a decrease in fecundity of cybrids. Other systems with mitonuclear epistasis experience reduced offspring production or sterility, e.g., (Fishman and Willis 2006; Ellison and Burton 2008b). Mitochondrial sequence variation in C. elegans is also known to impact sperm motility (Liau et al. 2007).

AF16 and HK104 hermaphrodites exhibited indistinguishable self-brood sizes (Figure 5) similar to those previously reported for both strains (Dolgin et al. 2007). However, cybrid line fecundities were significantly lower than the paternal parental strain in one cross direction. Thus, the act of exchanging one strain’s mitochondrial haplotype with the other’s has an impact on organismal fitness, and supports the interpretation that mitonuclear epistasis exists in these C. briggsae hybrids. The asymmetry seen in the fecundity phenotype suggests the presence of a mitonuclear DMI between the HK104 mitochondrial and AF16 nuclear genomes. It is an interesting correlation that this is the same conclusion reached for ROS levels, although whether a mechanistic connection exists between mitochondrial ROS and fecundity remains to be tested.

Other potential causes of phenotypic effects in cybrids

In addition to mitochondrial–nuclear effects, it is also important to address whether additional environmental or cytoplasmic factors might explain the phenotypic differences, particularly in fecundity, that we observe between cybrids and their paternal parental strains. With no evidence, to our knowledge, for the existence of Wolbachia or other cytoplasmic parasitic microbes in C. briggsae, we must also attempt to rule out other cytoplasmic effects and also potential effects of mitochondrial heteroplasmy.

Given recent reports on the potential impact of maternal effects on reproduction (Harvey and Orbidans 2011; Jobson et al. 2015), we were as rigorous as possible about experimentally controlling environmental conditions of individual nematodes involved in phenotyping experiments. We used NGM agar plates containing controlled volumes of agar, and controlled volumes of the same culture of OP50 E. coli for nematode husbandry, ensured the presence of OP50 ad libitum, maintained all strains in the same incubator, and took particular care to ensure that this rigorous control was extended at least to the parents and grandparents of all phenotyped individuals. This consistency should eliminate the possibility of maternal or even grand-maternal effects on phenotypes.

It has also been noted that naturally occurring heteroplasmy for a mitochondrial genome deletion can occur in C. briggsae populations, and that these changes could impact fitness (Howe and Denver 2008). Therefore, we inquired whether heteroplasmy for the ND5∆ existed in our cybrid lines, and whether these lines had rapidly evolved different levels of heteroplasmy than the parental strains AF16 and HK104. By our PCR analysis, using primers that distinguish deletion-bearing and intact mitochondrial genomes (Figure 4), no major apparent differences in heteroplasmy levels exist between AF16, HK104, and the five cybrid lines. If any trend exists, digital densitometry suggests that it is a reduction of heteroplasmy in the cybrids. Such a pattern would be predicted, if anything, to improve cybrid fitness.

Distinguishing DMI from coevolution by effect symmetry

Negative mitochondrial–nuclear epistasis in hybrids might occur in this system by the neutral accumulation of lineage-specific incompatibilities (DMIs), or by selection for compensatory mutation in epistatic pairs (coevolution). It is important to distinguish between these in order to understand the forces that act to generate hybrid dysfunction and ultimately speciation.

Mitochondrial–nuclear epistasis provides a valuable opportunity to more readily distinguish the two possibilities than with nuclear–nuclear epistatic pairs. Under the neutral process by which DMIs accumulate in separate lineages, only one hybrid cross direction should result in the production of dysfunctional hybrids if one of the epistatic loci is in the maternally inherited mitochondrial genome (Turelli and Moyle 2007). Thus, we expect asymmetry in hybrid dysfunction where mitonuclear DMIs exist.

On the other hand, when hybrid dysfunction is due to the separation of coevolved mitochondrial and nuclear loci, one would expect to observe symmetrical effects, because coevolved alleles at two (or more) loci should exist in both parental populations. Thus, any hybrid, regardless of cross direction, should experience the deleterious effects of separating the coevolved alleles of epistatic gene pairs. However, it is also possible that the neutral accumulation of multiple mitonuclear DMIs produces a symmetrical effect (Turelli and Orr 2000; Turelli and Moyle 2007).

Our data reveal asymmetric phenotypic effects in cybrids on fecundity and ROS levels in AF16 (nuclear); HK104 (mt) cybrids. We attribute these effects to the neutral accumulation of mitonuclear DMIs, with the incompatibilities being located in the HK104 mitochondrial and AF16 nuclear genomes. This conclusion can be reconciled with evidence of marker transmission ratio distortion patterns in AF16-HK104 hybrids. We previously found evidence for selection against the combination of AF16 nuclear chromosome V alleles, and HK104 mitotypes, in AI-RIL (Ross et al. 2011). This effect is consistent with our interpretation here that ROS levels increase, and fecundity decreases, in cybrids combining the AF16 nuclear and HK104 mitochondrial genomes. However, it remains unclear whether the symmetrical effect of cybridization on lipid content is due to separation of coadapted epistatic pairs, which might provide evidence of the action of selection on the divergence of AF16 and HK104, or whether the symmetry might entirely be due to the neutral independent accumulation of DMIs in both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of both AF16 and HK104. In addition to the concept that symmetrical effects could be due to accumulation of multiple independent DMIs (Turelli and Orr 2000; Turelli and Moyle 2007), it has also been noted that such complex incompatibilities are expected to be common (Orr 1995; Coyne and Orr 2004). The presence of DMIs and possibly also coevolved mitochondrial–nuclear loci between AF16 and HK104 suggests that these populations might be experiencing the early stages of speciation.

Genetic incompatibilities in Caenorhabditis

The first speciation study in Caenorhabditis demonstrated, through attempted hybridization, that C. elegans and C. briggsae are true biological species (Nigon and Dougherty 1949). Subsequently, mating trials demonstrated that reproductive isolation exists between many pairs of described species of Caenorhabditis (Baird et al. 1992; Baird and Yen 2000; Sudhaus and Kiontke 2007; Felix et al. 2014). Recent efforts have also probed the basis of interspecies incompatibilities where hybrid offspring are not always completely sterile, such as between C. briggsae and its sister species C. nigoni (Woodruff et al. 2010; Kozlowska et al. 2012; Yan et al. 2012), and between C. remanei and its sister species C. latens (Dey et al. 2012, 2014).

Fewer cases exist of genetic incompatibility occurring within one Caenorhabditis species. In C. elegans, a paternal-zygotic incompatibility involving the zeel-1 and peel-1 genes results in embryonic lethality in one interpopulation cross between the Bristol (N2) and Hawaii (CB4856) strains (Seidel et al. 2011). Importantly, the zeel/peel system also displays asymmetry, where embryonic lethality is related to F1 hybrid x P0 cross direction (Seidel et al. 2008). Systematic exploration of the landscape of epistatic interactions between these two strains subsequently suggested that multiple deleterious genetic interactions might exist in hybrids (Snoek et al. 2014).

We describe here the first naturally occurring intraspecies mitonuclear epistatic interaction in the model genus Caenorhabditis. Our study is the first to create AF16-HK104 cybrids, and the second reported use of cybrids in C. briggsae to study the effects of genetic variation on mitochondrial and organismal function (Hicks et al. 2012). The identification of a mitonuclear epistatic interaction causing mitochondrial and fitness deficiencies in AF16-HK104 hybrid genotypes represents the third known genetic incompatibility segregating within C. briggsae populations. Earlier evidence for potential interstrain genetic incompatibilities showed that AF16-HK104 hybrids produce more embryonic lethality than either parental strain and that ∼20% of the offspring produced by selfing an F1 hybrid take longer to reach adulthood (Dolgin et al. 2008). This developmental delay phenotype was later found to be specific to AF16-HK104 hybrids, and to involve a locus on chromosome III (Ross et al. 2011; Baird and Stonesifer 2012). Thus, C. briggsae is an excellent system in which to study the evolution of genetic incompatibilities within a species.

Conclusion and future prospects

We provide evidence of neutrally accumulated DMIs that have arisen in two populations of a single species. These DMIs result in asymmetric mitochondrial–nuclear epistatic interactions in C. briggsae cybrids. Although producing statistically significant differences in mitochondrial ROS levels and in fecundity, the DMIs only reduce and do not absolutely eliminate hybrid fitness. Additional evidence of incompatibilities segregating within C. briggsae comes from the symmetrical effect of mitochondrial–nuclear mismatch on lipid content in hybrids. It is possible that this effect is due to the separation of coevolved mitonuclear epistatic loci.

Although genetic incompatibilities have been found segregating within both C. elegans and C. briggsae, the phylogeographical population structure present in C. briggsae provides a robust framework for testing hypotheses about the evolutionary histories and potentially adaptive values of variants that impact hybrid fitness. Thus, it might not be surprising that the intraspecies C. briggsae genetic incompatibilities described thus far exist between a tropical clade strain (AF16) and a temperate clade strain (HK104); most reported incompatibilities do not completely eliminate hybrid fitness. As has been noted, the Dobzhansky-Muller model does not require that the epistatic interaction cause absolute loss of hybrid fitness (i.e., lethality or sterility) (Coyne and Orr 2004). This is arguably a benefit of the C. briggsae system and should facilitate more efficient identification of the underlying genetic mechanisms of reduced hybrid compatibility than is possible in systems where hybrids are inviable or infertile. Additional studies will be necessary to investigate the potential adaptive value of mitochondrial divergence and to pursue the possibility that mitochondrial divergence and potential compensatory nuclear mutations might have been driven by ecological forces. Considerable value exists in studying the basis of intraspecific incompatibilities (Maheshwari and Barbash 2011), and C. briggsae will continue to be useful for studying the genetic basis of population divergence, the evolution of genetic incompatibilities, and the dynamics of genomic coevolution.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Eric Haag, Dee Denver, Ron Burton, David Rand, Leonie Moyle, Michael Turelli, Patrick Phillips, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful discussions, advice, and support. Strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). This research was funded by National Institutes of Health grants F32GM090492 and SC2GM113727 and CSU Fresno College of Science and Mathematics (CSM) start-up funds to J.A.R., and by CSM Faculty-Sponsored Student Research Awards to J.R. and C-C.C.

Footnotes

Supporting information is available online at www.g3journal.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/g3.115.022970/-/DC1

Communicating editor: P. C. Phillips

Literature Cited

  1. Al Rawi S., Louvet-Vallee S., Djeddi A., Sachse M., Culetto E., et al. , 2011.  Postfertilization autophagy of sperm organelles prevents paternal mitochondrial DNA transmission. Science 334: 1144–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baird S. E., Yen W. C., 2000.  Reproductive isolation in Caenorhabditis: terminal phenotypes of hybrid embryos. Evol. Dev. 2: 9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baird, S. E., and H. M. Chamberlin, 2006 Caenorhabditis briggsae methods (December 18, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, /10.1895/wormbook.1.128.1, http://www.wormbook.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baird S. E., Stonesifer R., 2012.  Reproductive isolation in Caenorhabditis briggsae: dysgenic interactions between maternal- and zygotic-effect loci result in a delayed development phenotype. Worm 1: 189–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baird S. E., Sutherlin M. E., Emmons S. W., 1992.  Reproductive isolation in Rhabditidae (Nematoda: Secernentea): mechanisms that isolate six species of three genera. Evolution 46: 585–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolnick D. I., Near T. J., 2005.  Tempo of hybrid inviability in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Evolution 59: 1754–1767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonilla E., Prelle A., 1987.  Application of nile blue and nile red, two fluorescent probes, for detection of lipid droplets in human skeletal muscle. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35: 619–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Breeuwer J. A. J., Werren J. H., 1995.  Hybrid breakdown between two haplodiploid species: the role of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes. Evolution 49: 705–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burton R. S., Barreto F. S., 2012.  A disproportionate role for mtDNA in Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities? Mol. Ecol. 21: 4942–4957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Callaway E., 2014.  Reproductive medicine: the power of three. Nature 509: 414–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chow C. W., Thorburn D. R., 2000.  Morphological correlates of mitochondrial dysfunction in children. Hum. Reprod. 15(Suppl 2): 68–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Corbett-Detig R. B., Zhou J., Clark A. G., Hartl D. L., Ayroles J. F., 2013.  Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species. Nature 504: 135–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Coyne J. A., Orr H. A., 2004.  Speciation, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cutter A. D., 2012.  The polymorphic prelude to Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 209–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dey A., Jeon Y., Wang G. X., Cutter A. D., 2012.  Global population genetic structure of Caenorhabditis remanei reveals incipient speciation. Genetics 191: 1257–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dey A., Jin Q., Chen Y. C., Cutter A. D., 2014.  Gonad morphogenesis defects drive hybrid male sterility in asymmetric hybrid breakdown of Caenorhabditis nematodes. Evol. Dev. 16: 362–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dingley S., Polyak E., Lightfoot R., Ostrovsky J., Rao M., et al. , 2010.  Mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction variably increases oxidant stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mitochondrion 10: 125–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobzhansky T., 1936.  Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dolgin E. S., Charlesworth B., Baird S. E., Cutter A. D., 2007.  Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis nematodes. Evolution 61: 1339–1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dolgin E. S., Felix M. A., Cutter A. D., 2008.  Hakuna Nematoda: genetic and phenotypic diversity in African isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. Heredity 100: 304–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dowling D. K., Friberg U., Hailer F., Arnqvist G., 2007.  Intergenomic epistasis for fitness: within-population interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 175: 235–244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellison C. K., Burton R. S., 2006.  Disruption of mitochondrial function in interpopulation hybrids of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 60: 1382–1391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellison C. K., Burton R. S., 2008a Genotype-dependent variation of mitochondrial transcriptional profiles in interpopulation hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 15831–15836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellison C. K., Burton R. S., 2008b Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 62: 631–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ellison C. K., Niehuis O., Gadau J., 2008.  Hybrid breakdown and mitochondrial dysfunction in hybrids of Nasonia parasitoid wasps. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1844–1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Estes S., Coleman-Hulbert A. L., Hicks K. A., de Haan G., Martha S. R., et al. , 2011.  Natural variation in life history and aging phenotypes is associated with mitochondrial DNA deletion frequency in Caenorhabditis briggsae. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Felix M. A., Braendle C., Cutter A. D., 2014.  A streamlined system for species diagnosis in Caenorhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with name designations for 15 distinct biological species. PLoS One 9: e94723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fishman L., Willis J. H., 2006.  A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 60: 1372–1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fodor A., Riddle D. L., Nelson F. K., Golden J. W., 1983.  Comparison of a new wild-type Caenorhabditis briggsae with laboratory strains of C. briggsae and C. elegans. Nematologica 29: 203–217. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gagnaire P. A., Normandeau E., Bernatchez L., 2012.  Comparative genomics reveals adaptive protein evolution and a possible cytonuclear incompatibility between European and American eels. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 2909–2919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gemmell N. J., Metcalf V. J., Allendorf F. W., 2004.  Mother’s curse: the effect of mtDNA on individual fitness and population viability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 238–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gershoni M., Templeton A. R., Mishmar D., 2009.  Mitochondrial bioenergetics as a major motive force of speciation. BioEssays 31: 642–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gershoni M., Levin L., Ovadia O., Toiw Y., Shani N., et al. , 2014.  Disrupting mitochondrial-nuclear coevolution affects OXPHOS complex I integrity and impacts human health. Genome Biol. Evol. 6: 2665–2680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gibson J. D., Niehuis O., Peirson B. R., Cash E. I., Gadau J., 2013.  Genetic and developmental basis of F2 hybrid breakdown in Nasonia parasitoid wasps. Evolution 67: 2124–2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gupta B. P., Johnsen R., Chen N., 2007.  Genomics and biology of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae (May 3, 2007), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, /10.1895/wormbook.1.136.1, http://www.wormbook.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gyllensten U., Wharton D., Wilson A. C., 1985.  Maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA during backcrossing of two species of mice. J. Hered. 76: 321–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Harvey S. C., Orbidans H. E., 2011.  All eggs are not equal: the maternal environment affects progeny reproduction and developmental fate in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 6: e25840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hicks K. A., Howe D. K., Leung A., Denver D. R., Estes S., 2012.  In vivo quantification reveals extensive natural variation in mitochondrial form and function in Caenorhabditis briggsae. PLoS One 7: e43837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hoekstra L. A., Siddiq M. A., Montooth K. L., 2013.  Pleiotropic effects of a mitochondrial-nuclear incompatibility depend upon the accelerating effect of temperature in Drosophila. Genetics 195: 1129–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Howe D. K., Denver D. R., 2008.  Muller’s Ratchet and compensatory mutation in Caenorhabditis briggsae mitochondrial genome evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Howe D. K., Baer C. F., Denver D. R., 2010.  High rate of large deletions in Caenorhabditis briggsae mitochondrial genome mutation processes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2: 29–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jobson M. A., Jordan J. M., Sandrof M. A., Hibshman J. D., Lennox A. L., et al. , 2015.  Transgenerational effects of early life starvation on growth, reproduction, and stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 201: 201–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson N. A., 2010.  Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield? Trends Genet. 26: 317–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones K. T., Greer E. R., Pearce D., Ashrafi K., 2009.  Rictor/TORC2 regulates Caenorhabditis elegans fat storage, body size, and development through sgk-1. PLoS Biol. 7: e60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Karlok M. A., Jang S. H., Jaehning J. A., 2002.  Mutations in the yeast mitochondrial RNA polymerase specificity factor, Mtf1, verify an essential role in promoter utilization. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 28143–28149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kimura K. D., Tissenbaum H. A., Liu Y., Ruvkun G., 1997.  daf-2, an insulin receptor-like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 277: 942–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Koboldt D. C., Staisch J., Thillainathan B., Haines K., Baird S. E., et al. , 2010.  A toolkit for rapid gene mapping in the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. BMC Genomics 11: 236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kozlowska J. L., Ahmad A. R., Jahesh E., Cutter A. D., 2012.  Genetic variation for postzygotic reproductive isolation between Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis sp. 9. Evolution 66: 1180–1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Larkin M. A., Blackshields G., Brown N. P., Chenna R., McGettigan P. A., et al. , 2007.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee H. Y., Chou J. Y., Cheong L., Chang N. H., Yang S. Y., et al. , 2008.  Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135: 1065–1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lemire B., 2005.  Mitochondrial genetics (September 14, 2005), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, /10.1895/wormbook.1.25.1, http://www.wormbook.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Leppala J., Bokma F., Savolainen O., 2013.  Investigating incipient speciation in Arabidopsis lyrata from patterns of transmission ratio distortion. Genetics 194: 697–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Levin D. A., 2003.  The cytoplasmic factor in plant speciation. Syst. Bot. 28: 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liau W. S., Gonzalez-Serricchio A. S., Deshommes C., Chin K., LaMunyon C. W., 2007.  A persistent mitochondrial deletion reduces fitness and sperm performance in heteroplasmic populations of C. elegans. BMC Genet. 8: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu Z., Li X., Ge Q., Ding M., Huang X., 2014.  A lipid droplet-associated GFP reporter-based screen identifies new fat storage regulators in C. elegans. J. Genet. Genomics 41: 305–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Maheshwari S., Barbash D. A., 2011.  The genetics of hybrid incompatibilities. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45: 331–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mailloux R., Lemire J., Appanna V., 2007.  Aluminum-induced mitochondrial dysfunction leads to lipid accumulation in human hepatocytes: a link to obesity. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 20: 627–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mak H. Y., Nelson L. S., Basson M., Johnson C. D., Ruvkun G., 2006.  Polygenic control of Caenorhabditis elegans fat storage. Nat. Genet. 38: 363–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mayr E., 1942.  Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  60. McDaniel S. F., Willis J. H., Shaw A. J., 2007.  A linkage map reveals a complex basis for segregation distortion in an interpopulation cross in the moss Ceratodon purpureus. Genetics 176: 2489–2500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Meiklejohn C. D., Holmbeck M. A., Siddiq M. A., Abt D. N., Rand D. M., et al. , 2013.  An incompatibility between a mitochondrial tRNA and its nuclear-encoded tRNA synthetase compromises development and fitness in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Morrow E. H., Reinhardt K., Wolff J. N., Dowling D. K., 2015.  Risks inherent to mitochondrial replacement. EMBO Rep. 16: 541–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Moyle L. C., Graham E. B., 2006.  Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators’ Workshop 2005. Genome-wide associations between hybrid sterility QTL and marker transmission ratio distortion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 973–980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Muller H. J., 1939.  Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 14: 261–280. [Google Scholar]
  65. Muller H. J., 1940.  Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics, pp. 185–268 in The New Systematics, edited by Huxley J. Clarendon Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nam S. C., Kang C., 2001.  Expression of cloned cDNA for the human mitochondrial RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli and purification. Protein Expr. Purif. 21: 485–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Niehuis O., Judson A. K., Gadau J., 2008.  Cytonuclear genic incompatibilities cause increased mortality in male F2 hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N. vitripennis. Genetics 178: 413–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nigon V., Dougherty E. C., 1949.  Reproductive patterns and attempts at reciprocal crossing of Rhabditis elegans Maupas, 1900, and Rhabditis briggsae Dougherty and Nigon, 1949 (Nematoda: rhabditidae). J. Exp. Zool. 112: 485–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nohl H., 1986.  Oxygen radical release in mitochondria: influence of age, pp. 77–97 in Free Radicals, Aging, and Degenerative Disease, edited by Johnson J. E., Walford R., Harman D., Miquel J. Alan R. Liss, New York. [Google Scholar]
  70. Nohl H., Hegner D., 1978.  Do mitochondria produce oxygen radicals in vivo? Eur. J. Biochem. 82: 563–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Oakley C. G., Agren J., Schemske D. W., 2015.  Heterosis and outbreeding depression in crosses between natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 115: 73–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Orr H. A., 1995.  The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805–1813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Orr H. A., 1996.  Dobzhansky, Bateson, and the genetics of speciation. Genetics 144: 1331–1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Presgraves D. C., 2010.  The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 175–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rand D. M., Haney R. A., Fry A. J., 2004.  Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 645–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rasband, W. S., 1997–2015 ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
  77. Ross J. A., Koboldt D. C., Staisch J. E., Chamberlin H. M., Gupta B. P., et al. , 2011.  Caenorhabditis briggsae recombinant inbred line genotypes reveal inter-strain incompatibility and the evolution of recombination. PLoS Genet. 7: e1002174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sackton T. B., Haney R. A., Rand D. M., 2003.  Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes. Evolution 57: 2315–2325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sato M., Sato K., 2011.  Degradation of paternal mitochondria by fertilization-triggered autophagy in C. elegans embryos. Science 334: 1141–1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Seidel H. S., Rockman M. V., Kruglyak L., 2008.  Widespread genetic incompatibility in C. elegans maintained by balancing selection. Science 319: 589–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Seidel H. S., Ailion M., Li J., van Oudenaarden A., Rockman M. V., et al. , 2011.  A novel sperm-delivered toxin causes late-stage embryo lethality and transmission ratio distortion in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 9: e1001115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sherman N. A., Victorine A., Wang R. J., Moyle L. C., 2014.  Interspecific tests of allelism reveal the evolutionary timing and pattern of accumulation of reproductive isolation mutations. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Snoek L. B., Orbidans H. E., Stastna J. J., Aartse A., Rodriguez M., et al. , 2014.  Widespread genomic incompatibilities in Caenorhabditis elegans. G3 (Bethesda) 4: 1813–1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Soukas A. A., Kane E. A., Carr C. E., Melo J. A., Ruvkun G., 2009.  Rictor/TORC2 regulates fat metabolism, feeding, growth, and life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 23: 496–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Stiernagle T., 2006.  Maintenance of C. elegans (February 11, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, /10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1, http://www.wormbook.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sudhaus W., Kiontke K., 2007.  Comparison of the cryptic nematode species Caenorhabditis brenneri sp. n. and C. remanei (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with the stem species pattern of the Caenorhabditis Elegans group. Zootaxa 1456: 45–62. [Google Scholar]
  87. Thomas C. G., Wang W., Jovelin R., Ghosh R., Lomasko T., et al. , 2015.  Full-genome evolutionary histories of selfing, splitting, and selection in Caenorhabditis. Genome Res. 25: 667–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Tiffin P., Olson M. S., Moyle L. C., 2001.  Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268: 861–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Turelli M., Orr H. A., 2000.  Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663–1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Turelli M., Moyle L. C., 2007.  Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin’s corollary to Haldane’s rule. Genetics 176: 1059–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Turrens J. F., 2003.  Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J. Physiol. 552: 335–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. van den Ecker D., van den Brand M. A., Ariaans G., Hoffman M., Bossinger O., et al. , 2012.  Identification and functional analysis of mitochondrial complex I assembly factor homologues in C. elegans. Mitochondrion 12: 399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wang F., Huang G. D., Tian H., Zhong Y. B., Shi H. J., et al. , 2015.  Point mutations in KAL1 and the mitochondrial gene MT-tRNA(cys) synergize to produce Kallmann syndrome phenotype. Sci. Rep. 5: 13050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wei W., McCusker J. H., Hyman R. W., Jones T., Ning Y., et al. , 2007.  Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 12825–12830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Woodruff G. C., Eke O., Baird S. E., Felix M. A., Haag E. S., 2010.  Insights into species divergence and the evolution of hermaphroditism from fertile interspecies hybrids of Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genetics 186: 997–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Yan C., Bi Y., Yin D., Zhao Z., 2012.  A method for rapid and simultaneous mapping of genetic loci and introgression sizes in nematode species. PLoS One 7: e43770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zeyl C., Andreson B., Weninck E., 2005.  Nuclear-mitochondrial epistasis for fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolution 59: 910–914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhao Z., Flibotte S., Murray J. I., Blick D., Boyle T. J., et al. , 2010.  New tools for investigating the comparative biology of Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans. Genetics 184: 853–863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Strains CP129–CP133 are available upon request.


Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES