Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Jan 1;72(Pt 1):69–72. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015023154

Crystal structure of (RS)-(4-chloro­phen­yl)(pyridin-2-yl)methanol

Badiadka Narayana a, Balladka K Sarojini b, Hemmige S Yathirajan c,*, Ravindranath Rathore d, Christopher Glidewell e
PMCID: PMC4704747  PMID: 26870589

A combination of O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and C—Cl⋯π(pyrid­yl) inter­actions links the mol­ecules of the title compounds into (100) sheets.

Keywords: crystal structure, supra­molecular structure, hydrogen bonds, halogen–pyridine inter­actions

Abstract

In the title racemic compound, C12H10ClNO, the dihedral angle between the benzene and pyridine rings is 74.34 (6)°. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming zigzag C(5) [001] chains in which alternating R- and S-configuration mol­ecules are related by c-glide symmetry. In addition, inversion-related pairs of mol­ecules are linked into dimers by pairs of weak C—Cl⋯π(pyrid­yl) inter­actions, which link the hydrogen-bonded chains into (100) sheets. Structural comparisons are drawn with a number of related compounds.

Chemical context  

Simply substituted di­phenyl­methanols, RPh2COH, exhibit a very rich diversity of supra­molecular arrangements, including isolated mol­ecules, hydrogen-bonded dimers, trimers, tetra­mers and hexa­mers, as well as continuous hydrogen-bonded chains (Ferguson et al., 1992, 1994, 1995). The predominant mode of mol­ecular association in these structures involves O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, although O—H⋯π(arene) inter­actions are sometimes present. It is therefore of considerable inter­est to investigate the influence of an addition potential acceptor of hydrogen bonds as achieved, for example, by the replacement of one of the phenyl rings by an isosteric pyridyl substituent. Here we report the mol­ecular and supra­molecular structure of (RS)-4-chloro­phen­yl(pyridin-2-yl)methanol (I) (Fig. 1), which shows some striking structural differences from the simpler, non-chlorinated analogue phen­yl(pyridin-2-yl)methanol, whose structure has been reported recently (Kim & Kang, 2014; Tsang et al., 2015).graphic file with name e-72-00069-scheme1.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the R-enanti­omer of compound (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Structural commentary  

The mol­ecules of compound (I) contain a stereogenic centre at atom C1 (Fig. 1) and the reference mol­ecule was selected as one having the R-configuration at atom C1. The centrosymmetric space group confirms that compound (I) has crystallized as a racemic mixture.

Both of the rings are rotated out of the plane of the central C11–C1–C22 fragment, which makes dihedral angles of 70.69 (2) and 84.66 (9)° with the phenyl and pyridyl rings, respectively. The dihedral angle between the rings is 74.34 (6)°, and this value is very similar to the value of 71.42 (10)° reported (Kim & Kang, 2014) for the corres­ponding angle in the non-chlorinated analogue, compound (II). The general conformational similarity between the mol­ecules of compounds (I) and (II) is shown by the torsional angles O—C—C—C and O—C—C—N (Table 1), where the corresponding angles for the R-enanti­omer of (II) [the reference mol­ecule was actually selected (Kim & Kang, 2014) as one having the S-configuration] are 49.0 (4) and −150.6 (2)°, respectively.

Table 1. Selected torsion angles (°).

O1—C1—C11—C12 −51.14 (17) C11—C1—O1—H1A −180.0 (17)
O1—C1—C22—N21 −156.41 (13)    

However, one point of difference between the conformations in compounds (I) and (II) centres on the locations of the hydroxyl H atoms. In compound (I), this atom is anti­periplanar to atom C11 (Table 1), but the corresponding torsional angle for the R-enanti­omer of (II) is −67 (2)°. This difference in hydroxyl group conformations is probably associated with the different patterns of hydrogen-bonded supra­molecular aggregation in compounds (I) and (II), as discussed below.

Supra­molecular inter­actions  

The mol­ecules of compound (I) are linked by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Table 2), forming zigzag C(5) chains running parallel to the [001] direction. The chain containing the reference mol­ecule at (x, y, z) consists of mol­ecules which are related by the c-glide plane at y = Inline graphic, so that mol­ecules of R-configuration and S-configuration alternate along the chain (Fig. 2). Two chains of this type, related to one another by inversion, pass through each unit cell.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯N21i 0.84 (2) 2.01 (2) 2.8444 (18) 176 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Part of the crystal structure of compound (I), showing the formation of a hydrogen-bonded C(5) chain containing alternating enanti­omers and running parallel to [001]. For the sake of clarity, the H atoms bonded to the ring C atoms have been omitted. The atoms marked with an asterisk (*), a hash (#) or a dollar sign ($) are at the symmetry positions (x, Inline graphic − y, Inline graphic + z), (x, Inline graphic − y, −Inline graphic + z) and (x, y, 1 + z), respectively.

The crystal structure of compound (I) contains neither C—H⋯π hydrogen bonds nor π–π stacking inter­actions. There is, however, a single short C—Cl⋯π contact with geometric parameters Cl⋯Cg i = 3.5280 (10) Å, C⋯Cg i = 5.1785 (19) Å and C—Cl⋯Cg i = 157.79 (7)° [symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, −y, −z] where Cg represents the centroid of the pyridine ring. This Cl⋯Cg distance is slightly shorter than the average distance, 3.6 Å, deduced (Imai et al., 2008) from database analysis in a study which concluded that such inter­actions were attractive, with inter­action energies of ca 2 kcal mol−1, comparable to those typical of weak hydrogen bonds (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). In compound (I), this inter­action links inversion-related pairs of mol­ecules into cyclic centrosymmetric dimers (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A centrosymmetric dimer in in the crystal of (I) in which the mol­ecules are linked by C—Cl⋯π inter­actions, shown as hollow lines. For the sake of clarity, all of the H atoms have been omitted. The Cl atom marked with an asterisk (*) is at the symmetry position (1 − x, −y, −z).

The overall effect of the C—Cl⋯π inter­action in (I) is to link the hydrogen-bonded chain containing mol­ecules related by the c-glide plane at y = Inline graphic directly to the two chains that contain mol­ecules related by the glide planes at y = −Inline graphic and y = Inline graphic, respectively, and propagation by translation of this inter­action links the hydrogen-bonded chains along [001] into a sheet lying parallel to (100) (Fig. 4), but there are no direction-specific inter­actions between adjacent sheets.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A view of part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of a sheet parallel to (001) built from hydrogen-bonded chains linked by C—Cl⋯π inter­actions. For the sake of clarity, the H atoms bonded to C atoms have all been omitted.

Structural comparisons with related compounds  

It is of inter­est briefly to compare the supra­molecular assembly in compound (I), mediated by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and C—Cl⋯π inter­actions, with the assembly in some closely related compounds (II)–(VIII) (see Fig. 5), and particularly with compound (II), whose constitution differs from that of (I) only in lacking the chloro substituent.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Related compounds.

The mol­ecules of compound (II) are linked into C(5) chains by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Kim & Kang, 2014; Tsang et al., 2015), as in compound (I), but in (II) helical chains are built from mol­ecules related by 21 screw axes in space group Pna21, whereas in (I) zigzag chains are built from mol­ecules related by glide planes. Hence in compound (II) each chain is homochiral, with equal numbers of chains built only from mol­ecules having the R-configuration or only from mol­ecules having the S-configuration: in (I), by contrast, each chain contains an alternation of the two enanti­omers (cf. Fig. 2).

Similar homochiral C(5) chains are formed in each of the three isomeric carborane derivatives (III)–(V) (Tsang et al., 2015), regardless of whether they are crystallized as single enanti­omers or as racemates. The structure of compound (VI), which is isomeric with (II) has been reported briefly (Shimada et al., 2003) but, unfortunately, no atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014). The structure report on (VI) concerns enanti­omerically pure forms, in space group P212121, so that the formation of homochiral helical chains of C(7) type, seems plausible.

Compound (VII), which differs from (I) and (II) in containing two unsubstituted phenyl rings but no pyridyl ring, crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in space group P22121 (Ferguson et al., 1995) and the mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form Inline graphic(4) chains, but with no direction-specific inter­actions between adjacent chains. Compound (VIII) is the penta­fluoro­phenyl analogue of (VII) and the mol­ecules are again linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, but now forming cyclic Inline graphic(12) hexa­mers having exact Inline graphic (S 6) symmetry (Ferguson et al., 1995).

Synthesis and crystallization  

A sample of the title compound (I) was a gift from CAD Pharma, Bengaluru, India. Colourless blocks were grown by slow evaporation at room temperature of a solution in methanol, m.p. 478 K.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. All H atoms were located in difference maps. The H atoms bonded to C atoms were then treated as riding atoms in geometrically idealized position with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (aromatic and heteroaromatic) or 0.98 Å (aliphatic CH) and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). For the hydroxyl H atom H1A, the atomic coordinates were refined with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O), giving an O—H distance of 0.84 (2) Å. The analysis of variance reported a large value of K, 3.187, for the group of 252 very weak reflections having F c/F c(max) in the range 0.000 < F c/F c(max) < 0.005.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C12H10ClNO
M r 219.66
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 295
a, b, c (Å) 8.4309 (6), 16.1488 (11), 8.6878 (6)
β (°) 112.994 (2)
V3) 1088.85 (13)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.32
Crystal size (mm) 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
T min, T max 0.719, 0.938
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 11481, 2510, 1860
R int 0.030
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.651
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.045, 0.118, 1.06
No. of reflections 2510
No. of parameters 139
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.21, −0.39

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2012), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553sup1.cif

e-72-00069-sup1.cif (373.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553Isup2.hkl

e-72-00069-Isup2.hkl (201.1KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1440028

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

BN thanks the UGC (India) for financial assistance. The X-ray data were collected at SAIF, IIT, Madras, India.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C12H10ClNO F(000) = 456
Mr = 219.66 Dx = 1.340 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.4309 (6) Å Cell parameters from 2785 reflections
b = 16.1488 (11) Å θ = 2.5–28.6°
c = 8.6878 (6) Å µ = 0.32 mm1
β = 112.994 (2)° T = 295 K
V = 1088.85 (13) Å3 Block, colourless
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2510 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1860 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.030
φ and ω scans θmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) h = −9→10
Tmin = 0.719, Tmax = 0.938 k = −21→15
11481 measured reflections l = −11→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.118 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0513P)2 + 0.2352P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2510 reflections Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
139 parameters Δρmin = −0.39 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.66425 (18) 0.19218 (9) 0.43123 (18) 0.0367 (3)
H1 0.6340 0.2499 0.3976 0.044*
O1 0.65282 (15) 0.17831 (8) 0.58744 (14) 0.0475 (3)
H1A 0.725 (3) 0.2105 (14) 0.655 (3) 0.071*
C11 0.53625 (18) 0.13554 (9) 0.30436 (19) 0.0358 (3)
C12 0.5356 (2) 0.05176 (10) 0.3383 (2) 0.0458 (4)
H12 0.6128 0.0313 0.4400 0.055*
C13 0.4232 (2) −0.00168 (11) 0.2247 (2) 0.0533 (5)
H13 0.4239 −0.0578 0.2492 0.064*
C14 0.3099 (2) 0.02875 (12) 0.0747 (2) 0.0548 (5)
Cl14 0.16964 (9) −0.03856 (4) −0.07147 (8) 0.0922 (3)
C15 0.3058 (3) 0.11173 (14) 0.0391 (2) 0.0668 (6)
H15 0.2270 0.1321 −0.0619 0.080*
C16 0.4198 (2) 0.16462 (11) 0.1546 (2) 0.0538 (5)
H16 0.4175 0.2208 0.1304 0.065*
N21 0.88793 (16) 0.21277 (8) 0.32519 (16) 0.0414 (3)
C22 0.84457 (18) 0.17470 (9) 0.43935 (18) 0.0339 (3)
C23 0.9548 (2) 0.12092 (11) 0.5561 (2) 0.0461 (4)
H23 0.9219 0.0959 0.6353 0.055*
C24 1.1140 (2) 0.10498 (12) 0.5534 (2) 0.0537 (5)
H24 1.1899 0.0688 0.6304 0.064*
C25 1.1589 (2) 0.14314 (12) 0.4359 (3) 0.0570 (5)
H25 1.2658 0.1335 0.4314 0.068*
C26 1.0431 (2) 0.19599 (11) 0.3247 (2) 0.0523 (4)
H26 1.0741 0.2216 0.2446 0.063*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0359 (8) 0.0344 (8) 0.0421 (8) 0.0029 (6) 0.0178 (7) 0.0000 (6)
O1 0.0520 (7) 0.0526 (7) 0.0455 (7) −0.0078 (6) 0.0272 (6) −0.0106 (5)
C11 0.0323 (7) 0.0373 (8) 0.0411 (8) 0.0010 (6) 0.0177 (6) −0.0001 (6)
C12 0.0452 (9) 0.0401 (9) 0.0485 (9) 0.0034 (7) 0.0142 (7) 0.0020 (7)
C13 0.0589 (11) 0.0406 (9) 0.0629 (12) −0.0057 (9) 0.0265 (10) −0.0055 (8)
C14 0.0524 (10) 0.0617 (12) 0.0497 (10) −0.0168 (9) 0.0194 (8) −0.0134 (9)
Cl14 0.0971 (5) 0.0942 (5) 0.0724 (4) −0.0416 (4) 0.0190 (3) −0.0316 (3)
C15 0.0667 (12) 0.0685 (13) 0.0465 (10) −0.0118 (11) 0.0019 (9) 0.0068 (10)
C16 0.0554 (10) 0.0464 (10) 0.0502 (10) −0.0044 (8) 0.0105 (8) 0.0095 (8)
N21 0.0390 (7) 0.0417 (7) 0.0450 (8) −0.0018 (6) 0.0182 (6) 0.0005 (6)
C22 0.0341 (7) 0.0318 (7) 0.0351 (8) −0.0016 (6) 0.0128 (6) −0.0041 (6)
C23 0.0452 (9) 0.0492 (9) 0.0430 (9) 0.0064 (8) 0.0162 (7) 0.0031 (8)
C24 0.0418 (9) 0.0553 (11) 0.0563 (11) 0.0135 (8) 0.0108 (8) −0.0005 (9)
C25 0.0357 (8) 0.0633 (12) 0.0748 (13) 0.0032 (9) 0.0245 (9) −0.0093 (10)
C26 0.0459 (9) 0.0566 (11) 0.0637 (11) −0.0050 (9) 0.0315 (9) −0.0009 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—O1 1.4154 (18) C15—C16 1.381 (3)
C1—C11 1.512 (2) C15—H15 0.9300
C1—C22 1.5206 (19) C16—H16 0.9300
C1—H1 0.9800 N21—C22 1.3335 (19)
O1—H1A 0.84 (2) N21—C26 1.338 (2)
C11—C16 1.371 (2) C22—C23 1.382 (2)
C11—C12 1.385 (2) C23—C24 1.376 (2)
C12—C13 1.373 (2) C23—H23 0.9300
C12—H12 0.9300 C24—C25 1.367 (3)
C13—C14 1.371 (3) C24—H24 0.9300
C13—H13 0.9300 C25—C26 1.370 (3)
C14—C15 1.373 (3) C25—H25 0.9300
C14—Cl14 1.7376 (18) C26—H26 0.9300
O1—C1—C11 107.86 (12) C16—C15—H15 120.3
O1—C1—C22 111.56 (12) C11—C16—C15 121.00 (17)
C11—C1—C22 109.72 (11) C11—C16—H16 119.5
O1—C1—H1 109.2 C15—C16—H16 119.5
C11—C1—H1 109.2 C22—N21—C26 117.48 (14)
C22—C1—H1 109.2 N21—C22—C23 122.29 (13)
C1—O1—H1A 105.9 (15) N21—C22—C1 116.07 (13)
C16—C11—C12 118.40 (15) C23—C22—C1 121.63 (13)
C16—C11—C1 121.82 (14) C24—C23—C22 119.09 (16)
C12—C11—C1 119.78 (14) C24—C23—H23 120.5
C13—C12—C11 121.32 (16) C22—C23—H23 120.5
C13—C12—H12 119.3 C25—C24—C23 119.03 (17)
C11—C12—H12 119.3 C25—C24—H24 120.5
C14—C13—C12 119.13 (17) C23—C24—H24 120.5
C14—C13—H13 120.4 C24—C25—C26 118.56 (15)
C12—C13—H13 120.4 C24—C25—H25 120.7
C13—C14—C15 120.73 (17) C26—C25—H25 120.7
C13—C14—Cl14 119.54 (15) N21—C26—C25 123.55 (16)
C15—C14—Cl14 119.73 (15) N21—C26—H26 118.2
C14—C15—C16 119.40 (18) C25—C26—H26 118.2
C14—C15—H15 120.3
O1—C1—C11—C16 129.16 (15) C26—N21—C22—C23 1.2 (2)
C22—C1—C11—C16 −109.13 (16) C26—N21—C22—C1 −177.31 (14)
O1—C1—C11—C12 −51.14 (17) O1—C1—C22—N21 −156.41 (13)
C22—C1—C11—C12 70.57 (17) C11—C1—C22—N21 84.12 (16)
C16—C11—C12—C13 0.9 (2) O1—C1—C22—C23 25.1 (2)
C1—C11—C12—C13 −178.84 (14) C11—C1—C22—C23 −94.42 (16)
C11—C12—C13—C14 0.2 (3) N21—C22—C23—C24 −1.0 (2)
C12—C13—C14—C15 −1.3 (3) C1—C22—C23—C24 177.48 (15)
C12—C13—C14—Cl14 178.90 (13) C22—C23—C24—C25 0.3 (3)
C13—C14—C15—C16 1.4 (3) C23—C24—C25—C26 0.0 (3)
Cl14—C14—C15—C16 −178.83 (15) C22—N21—C26—C25 −0.9 (3)
C12—C11—C16—C15 −0.8 (3) C24—C25—C26—N21 0.3 (3)
C1—C11—C16—C15 178.90 (16) C11—C1—O1—H1A −180.0 (17)
C14—C15—C16—C11 −0.3 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1A···N21i 0.84 (2) 2.01 (2) 2.8444 (18) 176 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2.

References

  1. Bruker (2012). APEX2 and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). In The Weak Hydrogen Bond. Oxford University Press.
  3. Ferguson, G., Carroll, C. D., Glidewell, C., Zakaria, C. M. & Lough, A. J. (1995). Acta Cryst. B51, 367–377.
  4. Ferguson, G., Gallagher, J. F., Glidewell, C., Low, J. N. & Scrimgeour, S. N. (1992). Acta Cryst. C48, 1272–1275.
  5. Ferguson, G., Gallagher, J. F., Glidewell, C. & Zakaria, C. M. (1994). Acta Cryst. C50, 70–73.
  6. Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Imai, Y. N., Inoue, Y., Nakanishi, I. & Kitaura, K. (2008). Protein Sci. 17, 1129–1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Kim, H. & Kang, S. K. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  12. Shimada, H., Fujiki, S., Oginuma, M., Asakawa, M., Okawara, T., Kato, K., Yamamura, S., Akita, H., Hara, A. & Imamura, Y. (2003). J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 23, 29–35.
  13. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Tsang, M. Y., Di Salvo, F., Teixidor, F., Viñas, C., Planas, J. G., Choquesillo-Lazarte, D. & Vanthuyne, N. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 935–945.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553sup1.cif

e-72-00069-sup1.cif (373.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553Isup2.hkl

e-72-00069-Isup2.hkl (201.1KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023154/hb7553Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1440028

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES