Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Jan 1;72(Pt 1):49–52. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015023683

Crystal structure of tris­(trans-1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane-κ2 N,N′)cobalt(III) trichloride monohydrate

Megan K Gallagher a, Allen G Oliver a, A Graham Lappin a,*
PMCID: PMC4704754  PMID: 26870583

The first structure with coordinates of tris­(trans-1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexa­ne)cobalt(III) chloride monohydrate in the space group I Inline graphic2d is reported.

Keywords: crystal structure; cobalt(III); 1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexa­ne; coordination complex; hydrogen-bonding patterns

Abstract

The synthesis of the title hydrated complex salt, [Co(C6H14N2)3]Cl3·H2O, from racemic trans-1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane and [CoCl(NH3)5]Cl2 and its structural characterization are presented in this paper. The product was synthesized in the inter­est of understanding the hydrogen-bonding patterns of coordination complexes. Previous characterizations of the product in the I-42d space group have not yielded coordinates; thus, this paper provides the first coordinates for this complex in this space group. The octahedrally coordinated cation adopts twofold rotation symmetry, with outer-sphere chloride counter-ions and solvent water mol­ecules forming a hydrogen-bonded network with amine H atoms.

Chemical context  

We are inter­ested in the hydrogen-bonding patterns of various coordination complexes, especially those that incorporate optically active ligands, where the role of hydrogen bonding in the chiral discrimination between coordination complexes is important. As part of our studies, we prepared the title complex by the reaction of racemic trans-(R,R,S,S)-1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane with [Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ in aqueous solution at 323 K. The resulting complex is a racemic mixture and does not exhibit optical activity. Isolation of optically active forms is being undertaken.graphic file with name e-72-00049-scheme1.jpg

This complex was first reported in 1937 (Jaeger & Bijkerk, 1937) and by optical crystallography and X-ray diffraction, the space group was determined to be P61 and/or P65. There have been several, successive studies on this compound, and all are reported in a variety of space groups and configurations of the ligand (P61(5): Jaeger & Bijkerk, 1937; [lel3] Marumo et al., 1970; [lel2ob] Sato & Saito, 1977; C2: [ob3] Kobayashi et al., 1972; R32: [ob3] Kobayashi et al., 1983; I Inline graphic2d, Andersen et al., 1973). Note: the 1983 Kobyashi article is a correction of the space group reported for the 1972 paper. The Andersen structure was a unit-cell determination and heavy-atom coordinate prediction based on powder diffraction data. No coordinates are available for that structure. Herein, we report the structural characterization of tris­(trans-1,2 di­amino­cyclo­hexa­ne)cobalt(III) chloride monohydrate in I Inline graphic2d.

Structural commentary  

The cation crystallizes on a twofold rotation axis at [x, 0.25, 0.625], thus, only half of the cation is represented in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1). One chloride is located on the twofold axis at [0.75, y, 0.875] and the remaining independent chloride anion occupies a general position within the lattice. The water mol­ecule of crystallization is also in a general position, but was modeled as a partial occupancy species (vide infra). The 1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane ligands adopt a lel3, Δ (λ,λ,λ) configuration with the (R,R)-ligand in the featured example. The cobalt atom adopts an octa­hedral coordination environment with only small distortions from an ideal geometry (Table 1). The 1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane ligands are unexceptional.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Labeling scheme for (I). Atomic displacement parameters are depicted at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) x, −y + Inline graphic, −z + Inline graphic.]

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Co1—N1 1.959 (4) Co1—N2 1.974 (4)
Co1—N1i 1.959 (4) Co1—N3i 1.980 (4)
Co1—N2i 1.974 (4) Co1—N3 1.980 (4)
       
N1—Co1—N1i 92.2 (3) N2i—Co1—N3i 92.64 (19)
N1—Co1—N2i 90.61 (19) N2—Co1—N3i 91.62 (19)
N1i—Co1—N2i 85.4 (2) N1—Co1—N3 175.8 (2)
N1—Co1—N2 85.4 (2) N1i—Co1—N3 91.58 (17)
N1i—Co1—N2 90.61 (19) N2i—Co1—N3 91.62 (19)
N2i—Co1—N2 174.2 (3) N2—Co1—N3 92.64 (19)
N1—Co1—N3i 91.58 (17) N3i—Co1—N3 84.7 (3)
N1i—Co1—N3i 175.8 (2)    

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Comparison with previously reported structures  

An inspection of the structure and comparison with the Marumo lel 3 complex gives an r.m.s. fit of 0.0706 for the cobalt and nitro­gen atoms (Marumo et al., 1970; Macrae et al., 2006). The predominant difference between the Marumo structure and that reported here is the mol­ecular symmetry. The Marumo structure adopts C 3 symmetry, with only one unique ligand. The structure herein adopts C 2 symmetry with one complete and one half ligand in the asymmetric unit.

Perhaps the most surprising change when compared with the Andersen structure is the contraction in cell parameters and overall cell-volume reduction. The cell parameters reported by Andersen are a = 19.208, c = 13.908 Å, V = 5131.3 Å3 (Andersen et al., 1973). Our study has a = 18.786, c = 13.857 Å and V = 4830.3 Å3. This change represents a 4.6% reduction in cell volume, with a and b contracting in a concerted fashion by nearly 0.5 Å. Typically one might expect a contraction of around 0.1 to 0.2 Å upon cooling, similar to that observed for the change in c. This observation led us to undertake variable temperature studies to determine if this was actually the case. Data on a crystal of the title compound were recorded at 120 K, 250 K and 293 K. Cell parameters and refinement statistics are given in Table 2. It should be noted that the redetermination of the unit cell at room temperature with a single crystal sample yielded a unit cell that is approximately 100 Å3 smaller in volume than that calculated originally from powder diffraction data.

Table 2. Comparison of 120, 250, and 293 K data sets.

  120 K 250 K 293 K
a, c (Å) 18.960 (3), 13.642 (2) 19.039 (9), 13.651 (7) 19.210 (10), 13.567 (8)
Vol (Å3) 4903.8 4948.6 5007.1
% Vol change (w.r.t. 293 K) 2.1 1.2 0.0
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.0525, 0.1401, 1.028 0.0386, 0.1078, 1.029 0.0586, 0.1617, 1.017

Data recorded on a second crystal selected from same batch. Crystal showed signs of degradation at higher temperatures, presumably due to solvent loss. Inspection of the crystal after 293 K data set showed fracturing within the crystal.

Supra­molecular features  

The complex forms a hydrogen-bonded network with the amino nitro­gen atoms on the cation serving as donors to nearby chlorine atoms and the water mol­ecule (Fig. 2, Table 3). Although the water hydrogen atoms could not be located, there are contacts to nearby chlorine atoms from the oxygen atom at reasonable hydrogen-bond contact distances (Table 3). Close inspection of the Fourier difference map reveals several locations for potential hydrogen-atom sites on the water oxygen. However, none of these sites refines suitably when modeled as a hydrogen atom. Further exacerbating this situation is the disorder apparent with this lattice water mol­ecule, because through symmetry there is another water oxygen atom located only 2.11 Å distant. Clearly this is unreasonable and reflects the disorder in this mol­ecule. The water of crystallization and chlorine anions are arranged within discrete pockets within the lattice. Other contacts are simple van der Waals inter­actions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Packing diagram of (I), viewed along the c axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Table 3. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1ii 0.91 2.46 3.270 (5) 148
N1—H1B⋯Cl1 0.91 2.33 3.222 (5) 167
N2—H2A⋯Cl2iii 0.91 2.57 3.433 (5) 159
N2—H2B⋯O1 0.91 2.35 3.019 (14) 130
N3—H3A⋯Cl2 0.91 2.46 3.352 (5) 167
N3—H3B⋯Cl1i 0.91 2.36 3.223 (5) 158
O1⋯Cl1i     3.296 (18)  
O1⋯Cl1iv     3.393 (15)  
O1⋯Cl1v     3.287 (12)  
C2—H2⋯Cl1iv 1.00 2.78 3.772 (10) 173
C3—H3C⋯O1 0.99 2.37 3.039 (15) 124
C8—H8A⋯Cl1vi 0.99 2.86 3.780 (6) 156
C8—H8B⋯Cl2 0.99 2.94 3.762 (6) 141

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic.

Database survey  

This structure was first reported in 1937 (Jaeger & Bijkerk, 1937) with the space group P61 and P65 at room temperature. Other reports of the structure with the P61 space group were in 1970 (Marumo et al., 1970) and 1977 (Sato & Saito, 1977), both at room temperature. The structure was also reported in 1972 (Kobayashi et al., 1972) with the C2 space group and 1983 (Kobayashi et al., 1983) with the R32 space group. The first report of the structure with the I Inline graphic2d space group was in 1973 (Andersen et al., 1973). This structure is at room temperature and no coordinates were provided by the authors. The structure presented in this paper has the same I Inline graphic2d space group and provides coordinates for the structure at cryogenic temperatures.

Synthesis and crystallization  

0.56 g of [Co(NH3)5Cl]Cl2 was dissolved in 200 mL of DI water and allowed to stand overnight. 1.54 g of racemic trans-(R,R,S,S)1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane was added along with a small amount of charcoal. The mixture was stirred and heated at 313–323K for 2 d. The solution was filtered through a SP Sephadex C25 column. Using first 0.01 M HCl then 1 M HCl, the product was collected from the column. The fractions were placed in evaporation dishes and allowed to dry for three weeks. Orange crystals formed in the evaporation dish and were harvested for analysis.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic atomic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms were included in geometrically calculated positions with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C/N). C—H distances were fixed at 0.95 Å and N—H distances fixed at 0.91 Å.

Table 4. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Co(C6H14N2)3]Cl3·H2O
M r 525.87
Crystal system, space group Tetragonal, I Inline graphic2d
Temperature (K) 120
a, c (Å) 18.7857 (14), 13.8572 (12)
V3) 4890.2 (9)
Z 8
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.05
Crystal size (mm) 0.22 × 0.06 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII
Absorption correction Numerical (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
T min, T max 0.809, 0.926
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 43332, 2707, 2416
R int 0.068
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.642
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.047, 0.130, 1.06
No. of reflections 2707
No. of parameters 137
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.14, −0.62
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 1004 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013).
Absolute structure parameter 0.003 (7)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

The water of crystallization was determined to be partially occupied by inspection of the displacement parameters during refinement. The occupancy was set to 50% in the final model which yielded reasonable displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms could not be located or reliably modeled on the water molecule, but have been included in the chemical formula for completeness.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023683/lh5797sup1.cif

e-72-00049-sup1.cif (1.3MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023683/lh5797Isup2.hkl

e-72-00049-Isup2.hkl (217.6KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1441534

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Co(C6H14N2)3]Cl3·H2O Dx = 1.429 Mg m3
Mr = 525.87 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, I42d Cell parameters from 9897 reflections
a = 18.7857 (14) Å θ = 2.8–24.8°
c = 13.8572 (12) Å µ = 1.05 mm1
V = 4890.2 (9) Å3 T = 120 K
Z = 8 Rod, orange
F(000) = 2240 0.22 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII diffractometer 2707 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2416 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Bruker TRIUMPH curved-graphite monochromator Rint = 0.068
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.2°, θmin = 1.8°
combination of ω and φ–scans h = −24→24
Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) k = −24→24
Tmin = 0.809, Tmax = 0.926 l = −17→17
43332 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.130 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0844P)2 + 6.4309P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06 (Δ/σ)max = 0.010
2707 reflections Δρmax = 1.14 e Å3
137 parameters Δρmin = −0.62 e Å3
0 restraints Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 1004 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Absolute structure parameter: 0.003 (7)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Co1 0.86364 (5) 0.2500 0.6250 0.0199 (2)
Cl1 0.85979 (10) 0.08706 (8) 0.43019 (16) 0.0553 (5)
Cl2 0.7500 0.15300 (10) 0.8750 0.0324 (4)
N1 0.9360 (2) 0.2216 (2) 0.5307 (3) 0.0265 (9)
H1A 0.9779 0.2126 0.5612 0.032*
H1B 0.9219 0.1813 0.4996 0.032*
N2 0.8689 (2) 0.3445 (2) 0.5631 (4) 0.0289 (10)
H2A 0.8301 0.3513 0.5249 0.035*
H2B 0.8693 0.3791 0.6090 0.035*
N3 0.7858 (2) 0.2801 (2) 0.7122 (3) 0.0239 (9)
H3A 0.7819 0.2488 0.7621 0.029*
H3B 0.7956 0.3238 0.7370 0.029*
C1 0.9455 (5) 0.2804 (4) 0.4598 (6) 0.057 (2)
H1 0.9047 0.2750 0.4141 0.068*
C2 0.9338 (4) 0.3487 (5) 0.5050 (7) 0.063 (2)
H2 0.9740 0.3562 0.5511 0.075*
C3 0.9375 (4) 0.4089 (4) 0.4326 (7) 0.060 (2)
H3C 0.9309 0.4549 0.4662 0.071*
H3D 0.8986 0.4036 0.3849 0.071*
C4 1.0086 (5) 0.4087 (6) 0.3809 (9) 0.092 (4)
H4A 1.0473 0.4181 0.4277 0.110*
H4B 1.0094 0.4468 0.3316 0.110*
C5 1.0206 (5) 0.3362 (5) 0.3323 (6) 0.065 (2)
H5A 0.9874 0.3319 0.2772 0.078*
H5B 1.0696 0.3351 0.3061 0.078*
C6 1.0107 (3) 0.2723 (4) 0.3971 (4) 0.0418 (17)
H6A 1.0058 0.2289 0.3570 0.050*
H6B 1.0532 0.2665 0.4385 0.050*
C7 0.7181 (3) 0.2825 (3) 0.6575 (4) 0.0251 (10)
H7 0.7186 0.3259 0.6157 0.030*
C8 0.6525 (3) 0.2853 (3) 0.7199 (4) 0.0311 (12)
H8A 0.6529 0.3296 0.7587 0.037*
H8B 0.6523 0.2443 0.7648 0.037*
C9 0.5856 (3) 0.2833 (3) 0.6569 (5) 0.0359 (13)
H9A 0.5840 0.3263 0.6157 0.043*
H9B 0.5428 0.2833 0.6985 0.043*
O1 0.9506 (10) 0.4729 (6) 0.6332 (9) 0.104 (6) 0.5

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Co1 0.0181 (4) 0.0195 (4) 0.0221 (4) 0.000 0.000 −0.0026 (4)
Cl1 0.0471 (9) 0.0311 (8) 0.0877 (13) −0.0106 (7) 0.0231 (10) −0.0252 (8)
Cl2 0.0324 (9) 0.0358 (10) 0.0291 (9) 0.000 0.0006 (8) 0.000
N1 0.023 (2) 0.030 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.0010 (18) 0.0021 (17) −0.0049 (18)
N2 0.022 (2) 0.024 (2) 0.041 (2) −0.0001 (18) −0.003 (2) 0.0034 (18)
N3 0.023 (2) 0.024 (2) 0.025 (2) 0.0015 (18) 0.0006 (17) −0.0056 (17)
C1 0.071 (5) 0.043 (4) 0.055 (4) 0.003 (4) 0.032 (4) 0.013 (3)
C2 0.050 (4) 0.058 (5) 0.080 (6) 0.014 (4) 0.023 (4) 0.035 (4)
C3 0.030 (3) 0.057 (5) 0.091 (6) −0.003 (3) −0.006 (4) 0.046 (4)
C4 0.055 (5) 0.104 (9) 0.117 (9) −0.008 (5) 0.008 (6) 0.070 (8)
C5 0.068 (5) 0.086 (7) 0.042 (4) −0.026 (5) 0.017 (4) 0.014 (4)
C6 0.026 (3) 0.074 (5) 0.026 (3) −0.001 (3) 0.000 (2) 0.009 (3)
C7 0.020 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.029 (2) 0.000 (2) −0.0004 (19) −0.002 (2)
C8 0.025 (3) 0.037 (3) 0.031 (3) 0.005 (2) 0.004 (2) −0.001 (2)
C9 0.025 (3) 0.036 (3) 0.047 (3) 0.005 (2) 0.005 (2) 0.003 (3)
O1 0.206 (18) 0.049 (6) 0.058 (7) 0.026 (9) −0.076 (10) −0.016 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Co1—N1 1.959 (4) C3—C4 1.516 (12)
Co1—N1i 1.959 (4) C3—H3C 0.9900
Co1—N2i 1.974 (4) C3—H3D 0.9900
Co1—N2 1.974 (4) C4—C5 1.536 (15)
Co1—N3i 1.980 (4) C4—H4A 0.9900
Co1—N3 1.980 (4) C4—H4B 0.9900
N1—C1 1.489 (8) C5—C6 1.510 (11)
N1—H1A 0.9100 C5—H5A 0.9900
N1—H1B 0.9100 C5—H5B 0.9900
N2—C2 1.462 (9) C6—H6A 0.9900
N2—H2A 0.9100 C6—H6B 0.9900
N2—H2B 0.9100 C7—C8 1.506 (7)
N3—C7 1.482 (6) C7—C7i 1.516 (10)
N3—H3A 0.9100 C7—H7 1.0000
N3—H3B 0.9100 C8—C9 1.531 (8)
C1—C2 1.445 (12) C8—H8A 0.9900
C1—C6 1.508 (9) C8—H8B 0.9900
C1—H1 1.0000 C9—C9i 1.532 (13)
C2—C3 1.513 (9) C9—H9A 0.9900
C2—H2 1.0000 C9—H9B 0.9900
N1—Co1—N1i 92.2 (3) C3—C2—H2 106.6
N1—Co1—N2i 90.61 (19) C2—C3—C4 110.6 (6)
N1i—Co1—N2i 85.4 (2) C2—C3—H3C 109.5
N1—Co1—N2 85.4 (2) C4—C3—H3C 109.5
N1i—Co1—N2 90.61 (19) C2—C3—H3D 109.5
N2i—Co1—N2 174.2 (3) C4—C3—H3D 109.5
N1—Co1—N3i 91.58 (17) H3C—C3—H3D 108.1
N1i—Co1—N3i 175.8 (2) C3—C4—C5 109.9 (8)
N2i—Co1—N3i 92.64 (19) C3—C4—H4A 109.7
N2—Co1—N3i 91.62 (19) C5—C4—H4A 109.7
N1—Co1—N3 175.8 (2) C3—C4—H4B 109.7
N1i—Co1—N3 91.58 (17) C5—C4—H4B 109.7
N2i—Co1—N3 91.62 (19) H4A—C4—H4B 108.2
N2—Co1—N3 92.64 (19) C6—C5—C4 115.2 (7)
N3i—Co1—N3 84.7 (3) C6—C5—H5A 108.5
C1—N1—Co1 108.8 (4) C4—C5—H5A 108.5
C1—N1—H1A 109.9 C6—C5—H5B 108.5
Co1—N1—H1A 109.9 C4—C5—H5B 108.5
C1—N1—H1B 109.9 H5A—C5—H5B 107.5
Co1—N1—H1B 109.9 C1—C6—C5 111.2 (7)
H1A—N1—H1B 108.3 C1—C6—H6A 109.4
C2—N2—Co1 109.3 (4) C5—C6—H6A 109.4
C2—N2—H2A 109.8 C1—C6—H6B 109.4
Co1—N2—H2A 109.8 C5—C6—H6B 109.4
C2—N2—H2B 109.8 H6A—C6—H6B 108.0
Co1—N2—H2B 109.8 N3—C7—C8 114.1 (4)
H2A—N2—H2B 108.3 N3—C7—C7i 106.2 (3)
C7—N3—Co1 109.3 (3) C8—C7—C7i 111.7 (4)
C7—N3—H3A 109.8 N3—C7—H7 108.2
Co1—N3—H3A 109.8 C8—C7—H7 108.2
C7—N3—H3B 109.8 C7i—C7—H7 108.2
Co1—N3—H3B 109.8 C7—C8—C9 110.0 (4)
H3A—N3—H3B 108.3 C7—C8—H8A 109.7
C2—C1—N1 110.7 (6) C9—C8—H8A 109.7
C2—C1—C6 117.6 (7) C7—C8—H8B 109.7
N1—C1—C6 113.7 (6) C9—C8—H8B 109.7
C2—C1—H1 104.4 H8A—C8—H8B 108.2
N1—C1—H1 104.4 C8—C9—C9i 110.4 (4)
C6—C1—H1 104.4 C8—C9—H9A 109.6
C1—C2—N2 108.5 (7) C9i—C9—H9A 109.6
C1—C2—C3 111.6 (7) C8—C9—H9B 109.6
N2—C2—C3 116.4 (6) C9i—C9—H9B 109.6
C1—C2—H2 106.6 H9A—C9—H9B 108.1
N2—C2—H2 106.6
Co1—N1—C1—C2 32.0 (8) C2—C3—C4—C5 56.6 (11)
Co1—N1—C1—C6 167.1 (5) C3—C4—C5—C6 −51.3 (11)
N1—C1—C2—N2 −45.9 (10) C2—C1—C6—C5 −43.7 (10)
C6—C1—C2—N2 −179.1 (6) N1—C1—C6—C5 −175.6 (6)
N1—C1—C2—C3 −175.5 (6) C4—C5—C6—C1 43.1 (10)
C6—C1—C2—C3 51.3 (11) Co1—N3—C7—C8 164.5 (4)
Co1—N2—C2—C1 37.8 (8) Co1—N3—C7—C7i 41.0 (6)
Co1—N2—C2—C3 164.7 (7) N3—C7—C8—C9 −176.7 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −57.2 (11) C7i—C7—C8—C9 −56.2 (7)
N2—C2—C3—C4 177.5 (9) C7—C8—C9—C9i 57.0 (7)

Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+1/2, −z+5/4.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1ii 0.91 2.46 3.270 (5) 148
N1—H1B···Cl1 0.91 2.33 3.222 (5) 167
N2—H2A···Cl2iii 0.91 2.57 3.433 (5) 159
N2—H2B···O1 0.91 2.35 3.019 (14) 130
N3—H3A···Cl2 0.91 2.46 3.352 (5) 167
N3—H3B···Cl1i 0.91 2.36 3.223 (5) 158
O1···Cl1i 3.296 (18)
O1···Cl1iv 3.393 (15)
O1···Cl1v 3.287 (12)
C2—H2···Cl1iv 1.00 2.78 3.772 (10) 173
C3—H3C···O1 0.99 2.37 3.039 (15) 124
C8—H8A···Cl1vi 0.99 2.86 3.780 (6) 156
C8—H8B···Cl2 0.99 2.94 3.762 (6) 141

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, −z+5/4; (ii) y+1, −x+1, −z+1; (iii) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) y+1, x−1/2, z+1/4; (v) −y+1, −x+3/2, z+1/4; (vi) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2.

References

  1. Andersen, P., Galsbøl, F., Harnung, S. E. & Laier, T. (1973). Acta Chem. Scand. 27, 3973–3978.
  2. Bruker (2015). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker–Nonius AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  4. Jaeger, F. & Bijkerk, L. (1937). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 233, 97–139.
  5. Kobayashi, A., Marumo, F. & Saito, Y. (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 2709–2715.
  6. Kobayashi, A., Marumo, F. & Saito, Y. (1983). Acta Cryst. C39, 807.
  7. Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.
  9. Marumo, F., Utsumi, Y. & Saito, Y. (1970). Acta Cryst. B26, 1492–1498.
  10. Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Sato, S. & Saito, Y. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 860–865.
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  14. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023683/lh5797sup1.cif

e-72-00049-sup1.cif (1.3MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015023683/lh5797Isup2.hkl

e-72-00049-Isup2.hkl (217.6KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1441534

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES