Abstract
Inspiratory muscle strength and the flow and elastic pressure opposing inspiration were measured in seven patients with severe airways obstruction who found inspiration difficult at rest. A comparison was made of measurements obtained from seven normal subjects and five patients with airways obstruction not experiencing inspiratory dyspnoea at rest. Measurements were also obtained when inspiratory dyspnoea was induced in the normal subjects by adding an inspiratory resistance or by voluntarily increasing lung volume. Compared with the controls the inspiratory muscle strength of the patients was reduced but was not significantly less than that of the patients without inspiratory dyspnoea. The pressure required to produce inspiratory flow was significantly greater when inspiratory dyspnoea was present (P = 0-01). However, there was considerable overlap in the pressures of those with and without inspiratory dyspnoea. A better relationship was obtained when muscle strength was considered. The ratio of inspiratory muscle strength to the pressure required to produce flow was 0-24 +/- 0-07 (mean +/- SD) in patient with inspiratory dyspnoea, 0-10 +/- 0-03 in patients without inspiratory dyspnoea, and 0-033 +/- 0-019 in normal subjects. There was no overlap between the two patient groups. The ratios of the normal subjects were increased when inspiratory dyspnoea was induced and, with the exception of two cases, were all above those obtained when inspiratory dyspnoea was absent. Inspiratory dyspnoea was experienced with lower ratios in the normals than in the patients with airways obstruction.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- AGOSTONI E., FENN W. O. Velocity of muscle shortening as a limiting factor in respiratory air flow. J Appl Physiol. 1960 May;15:349–353. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.3.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Black L. F., Hyatt R. E. Maximal static respiratory pressures in generalized neuromuscular disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 May;103(5):641–650. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.5.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrd R. B., Hyatt R. E. Maximal respiratory pressures in chronic obstructive lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968 Nov;98(5):848–856. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1968.98.5.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CAMPBELL E. J., HOWELL J. B., PECKETT B. W. The pressure-volume relationships of the thorax of anaesthetized human subjects; a comparison of the effects of expiratory resistance and positive pressure inflation. J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):563–568. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CAMPBELL E. J., HOWELL J. B. The sensation of breathlessness. Br Med Bull. 1963 Jan;19:36–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gullott R. F. A comparison of two methods of evaluating total thoracic compliance. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1973 Jul;108(1):62–68. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1973.108.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NISELL O. The respiratory work and pressure during exercise, and their relation to dyspnea. Acta Med Scand. 1960 Feb 17;166:113–119. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1960.tb17360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saksena F. B., Burrows B. Thoracic compliance in chronic obstructive lung disease. J Lab Clin Med. 1966 Sep;68(3):427–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]