Abstract
The ability to rapidly screen complex libraries of pharmacological modulators is paramount to modern drug discovery efforts. This task is particularly challenging for agents that interact with lipid bilayers or membrane proteins due to the limited chemical, physical, and temporal stability of conventional lipid-based chromatographic stationary phases. Here, we describe the preparation and characterization of a novel stationary phase material composed of highly stable, polymeric-phospholipid bilayers self-assembled onto silica microparticles. Polymer lipid membranes were prepared by photochemical or redox initiated polymerization of 1,2-bis[10-(2′,4′-hexadieoyloxy)decanoyl]-sn-glycero-2-phosphocholine (bis-SorbPC), a synthetic, polymerizable lipid. The resulting polymerized bis-SorbPC (poly(bis-SorbPC)) stationary phases exhibited enhanced stability compared to particles coated with 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-phosphocholine (unpolymerized) phospholipid bilayers when exposed to chemical (50mM triton X-100 or 50% acetonitrile) and physical (15 min sonication) insults after 30 days of storage. Further, poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles survived slurry packing into fused silica capillaries, compared to unpolymerized lipid membranes, where the lipid bilayer was destroyed during packing. Frontal chromatographic analyses of the lipophilic small molecules acetylsalicylic acid, benzoic acid, and salicylic acid showed > 44% increase in retention times (P < 0.0001) for all analytes on poly(bis-SorbPC)-functionalized stationary phase compared to bare silica microspheres, suggesting a lipophilic retention mechanism. Phospholipid membrane-functionalized stationary phases that withstand the chemical and physical rigors of capillary LC conditions can substantially increase the efficacy of lipid membrane affinity chromatography, and represents a key advance towards the development of robust membrane protein-functionalized chromatographic stationary phases.
1. Introduction
Cellular phospholipid membranes serve as barriers between the extracellular and intracellular environments, and provide a chemical environment for the constitution and dynamic function of transmembrane proteins that are key to regulating biological function. Many pharmaceutical modulators interact with the cell membrane either via direct partitioning into the membrane or through interactions with transmembrane proteins. Thus, drug screening assays often utilize intact cells to identify novel small molecule agonists and antagonists that act at the cellular membrane. Unfortunately, cell-based assays may suffer from irreproducibility due to biological variability within heterogeneous populations, and may be difficult to interpret due to the complexity of downstream signal transduction [1]. Affinity chromatography platforms that incorporate phospholipid membranes offer more controlled and robust alternatives to cell based assays for identifying compounds that interact with phospholipid membranes or with integrated membrane proteins [2]. Additionally, membrane-functionalized affinity platforms tend to minimize non-specific interactions [3].
Phospholipid membrane-functionalized affinity stationary phases have been utilized in chromatography to study partitioning and binding interactions. In immobilized liposome chromatography (ILC), liposomes are retained on a support matrix through steric, hydrophobic, covalent, or avidin-biotin interactions [4–7]. ILC has been primarily used to study small molecule partitioning through lipid membranes [8, 9] and interactions between peptides and phospholipids [10]. Membrane proteins have been immobilized in ILC stationary phases and used to study ligand binding [11–14]; however, the liposomes are formed by non-covalent interactions, which are inherently unstable. Thus, the stationary phases have limited lifetimes and reduced pressure stability, requiring low flow rates that reduce separation efficiency. Furthermore, ILC phases lack the chemical and mechanical stabilities needed to withstand common chromatographic solution conditions (e.g. organic solvents, varying ionic strength, etc.) or mechanical insults (air bubbles, shear forces, etc.), decreasing reproducibility and limiting their utility in complex separations [15–19].
Immobilized artificial membranes (IAMs) provide greater stability and reproducibility than ILCs for membrane-based chromatography. IAMs are prepared by covalently attaching lipids to a particle surface by their tail ends, resulting in a lipid monolayer-functionalized chromatographic stationary phase [20–22]. IAMs have been used to study interactions between small molecules and phospholipids [20, 23, 24]. Additionally, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors[25], μ and κ opioid receptors[26], and other membrane proteins [27] have been immobilized in IAMs and dissociation constants calculated against a series of small molecules by frontal chromatography. While these studies revealed similar trends to binding constants calculated using cell-based assays, there were quantitative differences which may have arisen from altered protein conformation due to interactions with the underlying silica support and the use of lipid monolayers rather than more biologically relevant bilayers [26, 28].
To maximize the efficacy of affinity chromatography for screening drug interactions at the phospholipid membrane, a more stable lipid environment that more accurately mimics the lipid bilayer found in cellular membranes is needed. Bilayer stability can be increased by incorporating cholesterol, adsorbing a protective overlayer, membrane tethering, or polymerizing phospholipid monomers [2]. Of these methods, directly polymerizing phospholipid monomers yields the most stable lipid bilayer structures.
Polymerizable phospholipids have been used in various analytical platforms to form stable phospholipid bilayers. Planar supported lipid bilayers (PSLBs) prepared by polymerizing 1,2-bis[10-(2′,4′-hexadieoyloxy)decanoyl]-sn-glycero-2-phosphocholine (bis-SorbPC) exhibit enhanced stability against surfactants, organics, and exposure to high vacuum [15–17]. Polymerized bis-SorbPC (poly(bis-SorbPC)) membranes have also been utilized in capillary zone electrophoresis as stable surface coatings for reducing the electroosmotic flow and minimizing non-specific adsorption of proteins [29, 30]. These polymerized surface coatings were stable to surfactant solutions, shear forces, applied electric fields, and dry storage [29, 31]. Additionally, rhodopsin, a transmembrane protein, was incorporated into PSLBs prepared from poly(bis-SorbPC) and retained its activity in the stabilized bilayer [19]. Together, these findings suggest that polymeric lipid bilayers may offer an excellent stationary phase environment for affinity chromatography studies of drug-membrane interactions. Though polymeric-lipid coatings have been used to minimize non-specific adsorption of proteins in a range of materials, to our knowledge, polymeric-lipid membranes have not yet been utilized as a stationary phase material in packed columns.
Here we describe the preparation of a poly(bis-SorbPC) bilayer-functionalized stationary phase material for membrane affinity chromatography. We assess the chemical, physical, and temporal stability of the polymerized-phospholipid bilayers and demonstrate their utility as a lipid-based stationary phase for frontal chromatography.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and reagents
1,2-bis[10-(2′,4′-hexadieoyloxy)decanoyl]-sn-glycero-2-phosphocholine (bis-SorbPC, Tm = 29 °C) was synthesized according to previous protocols [32]. Before use, a 0.5 mL aliquot of 18 mg mL−1 bis-SorbPC in 7:3 (v/v) methanol (MeOH): H2O was purified on a C18 column (Shimadzu Chromegabond WR C18, 5 μm, 250 mm × 23 mm) using a 10 mL min-1 gradient (Shimadzu BCM-20A controller and LC-8A pumps) of H2O and MeOH. The MeOH volume in the mobile phase was increased from 50 – 70% in the first minute, increased from 70 – 85% over the next 20 min, increased from 85 – 100% over the next 40 min, and held at 100% for 5 min. The column was then flushed with 5% MeOH and 70% MeOH. All changes in the gradient were linear. The bis-SorbPC fraction was collected (elution time = 40 min), dried under vacuum, and washed 3 times with chloroform before dissolving in 500 μL chloroform. Purified bis-SorbPC was stored at −80 °C. The concentration of bis-SorbPC was determined by UV absorbance at 258 nm (ε = 47100 M−1 cm−1 in MeOH) (Model 440CCD Array UV-Vis Spectrophotometer; Spectral Instruments, Inc., Tucson, AZ). Sorbyl functional groups are light sensitive; thus, purification and preparation of bis-SorbPC-coated particles were performed under UV-free, yellow light.
1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC, Tm = −17 °C) was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). 3 μm and 5 μm silica particles (10% in water, size CV 10 –15%) were purchased from Polysciences, Inc. (Warrington, PA). FM1-43 was purchased from Invitrogen (Eugene, OR). K2S2O8, NaHSO3, and (NH4)2S2O8 were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals were purchased from Fisher (Pittsburgh, PA). H2O was obtained from a Barnstead EasyPure UV/UF purification system. Buffers were filtered using membranes with 0.2 μm pores before use.
2.2. Preparation of lipid-coated particles
Chloroform from lipid stock solutions (DOPC and bis-SorbPC) was evaporated under Ar and lipids were dried by vacuum overnight (FreeZone 6, Labconco, Kansas City, MO). Lipid-coated particles were prepared by vesicle fusion. Briefly, dried lipids were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS: 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4), pH 7.4, to a concentration of 1 mg mL-1. Lipid dispersions were sonicated at 40% output power until clarity using a cup horn sonicator (Model W-380, Heat Systems-Ultrasonics, Inc., Newtown, CT) to produce small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) with a mean diameter (number distribution) of 43 ± 15 nm (Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS, Worcetershire, United Kingdom). Non-porous silica particles (3.0 μm diameter) were added to the SUV dispersion at a surface area ratio of 1 silica: 6 lipid. The mixture was sonicated for 5 min and then allowed to rest for 30 min to promote vesicle fusion. Vesicle formation and fusion onto silica were performed at 35 °C, above the phase transition temperature of both lipids. For some studies, silica particles (5 μm diameter) were used and the lipid deposition was performed at room temperature using a surface area ratio of 1 silica: 25 lipid.
Bis-SorbPC-coated particles were polymerized by one of three methods. Before all polymerizations, the lipid / silica dispersions were degassed by bubbling N2 for 10 min. Lipid coatings on the 5 μm particles were polymerized using a UV pen lamp for 30 min. For 3 μm particles, the following conditions were utilized. UV-polymerized particles were irradiated with a 100 W Hg Arc lamp with an IR-water filter and a band pass filter (U-330, Edmund Optics, Barrington, NY) for 30 min while stirring.[33] Redox polymerizations were performed using two different methods. Bis-SorbPC-coated particles were polymerized in the presence of 65 mM K2S2O8 and 22 mM NaHSO3 for 3 h at 35 °C or at a mole ratio of 1 lipid: 300 (NH4)2S2O8: 300 NaHSO3 for 1 h at 35 °C. After preparation (DOPC-coated particles) or polymerization (bis-SorbPC-coated particles) each set of particles was washed by 6 cycles of centrifugation, removal of supernatant, and suspension in fresh PBS buffer.
2.3. Column packing with lipid-coated particles
Particles were packed in capillaries (50 μm or 75 μm i.d.; 360 μm o.d.; Polymicro Technologies, Phoenix, AZ) against Microtight filter assemblies (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA) [34–36]. The same filter assemblies were used as retaining frits at the column inlet. Particles were slurried in PBS buffer and packed at 1000 psi N2 (50 μm) or at 560 psi He (75 μm) until an 8 cm packed bed was formed. After packing, the gas tank was turned off and the pressure was allowed to slowly decrease by bleeding out of the capillary over the next 1 h.
2.4. Evaluation of the stability of lipid coatings
Aliquots of particles were treated on days 1, 2, 15, and 30 with triton X-100 or acetonitrile (ACN) to monitor the stability of the lipid bilayer. Particles were aliquoted into individual tubes, centrifuged, and suspended in fresh PBS, pH 7.4, at 1.8 × 107 particles per 100 μL. Particles were treated with 25 μL of 50 mM triton X-100 at room temperature for 15 min or with 50% acetonitrile (v/v) and sonicated for 15 min. After incubation, particles were rinsed by 4 cycles of centrifugation, removal of supernatant, and suspension in fresh PBS to a final concentration of 1.8 × 108 particles mL−1.
2.5. Fluorescence imaging of lipid-coated particles
FM1-43 was added to a particle slurry at a final concentration of 57 nM and allowed to intercalate into the lipid bilayer before imaging. Fluorescent images of particles were acquired on a Nikon Eclipse TE300 Quantum inverted microscope using a 40× / 1.30 N.A. oil objective. Fluorescent images were obtained using rhodamine filters: λex = 540 / 25 nm; λem = 620 / 60 nm. Images were collected using a Quantix 57 back-illuminated CCD camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) operated by MetaVue imaging software (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA). Images were analyzed using Image J [37]. Data is presented as the mean ± standard deviation (graphically represented as error bars) for n = 3 × 100, with the intensity of 100 particles quantified for each of three batches of particles that were prepared separately.
Packed capillary columns were imaged with or without FM1-43, which was allowed to intercalate into the bilayers before excess was rinsed away. Images were acquired using the instrument described above, but with a 4× / 0.13 N.A. objective. Data is presented as the mean ± standard deviation for n = 3 × 3, 3 measurements from 3 capillaries.
2.6. Flow cytometric analysis of lipid-coated particles
Flow cytometric analysis was performed using a FACScan flow cytometer (BDBiosciences, San Jose, CA) equipped with an air-cooled 15 mW Ar+ laser tuned to 488 nm. The emission fluorescence of FM1-43 was detected and recorded through a 582 / 42 nm bandpass filter in the FL2 channel. Data files consisting of approximately 50,000 events gated on forward scatter versus side scatter were acquired and analyzed using CellQuest PRO software (BD Biosciences). Appropriate electronic compensation was adjusted by acquiring particle populations with and without FM1-43. Data is presented as the average ± standard deviation for n = 3 × 50,000, with 50,000 gated events quantified for each of three batches of particles that were coated and polymerized independently.
2.7. Frontal chromatography using poly(lipid)-coated particles
Frontal chromatography was performed using a lab-built instrument. Isocratic elution with PBS, pH 7.4, as the mobile phase utilized pressure driven flow that was applied by a Micropro Syringe Pumping System (Eldex, Napa, CA) connected to a Cheminert injection valve (Valco, Houston, TX) with a 600 nL sample loop and a dwell volume of 750 nL. The eluent was pumped at 1 μL min−1 at room temperature, resulting in 2750 ± 50 psi when a packed column was present in the instrument. The elution profile was monitored by ultraviolet absorbance detection (Model 500 Detector, ChromTech, Apple Valley, MN) at 220 nm. Signal from the detector was collected with an A/D converter (NI USB-6221, National Instruments, Austin, TX) and software written in LabVIEW (National Instruments). All samples were prepared at a concentration of 100 μM in PBS buffer, pH 7.4. Statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed Student’s t-test.
3. Results and Discussion
The development of poly(lipid) stationary phase matrices for liquid chromatography (LC) will enable high throughput discovery of pharmacological and physiological compounds that interact with lipid bilayers. A key long term motivation of this research is the preparation of highly stabile, membrane protein-functionalized stationary phases for affinity chromatography. As a first step towards realizing this goal, we evaluated the physical and chemical stability of polymer-lipid bilayers prepared on silica particles that were packed into capillary LC columns and subsequently utilized for chromatographic analyses.
3.1. Chemical Stability of polymerized bis-SorbPC stationary phase
Fusing SUVs with a hydrophilic, silica surface results in rapid collapse of the vesicles to form a supported bilayer [38]. Supported lipid bilayers have been prepared on a range of substrates including planar silica substrates and curved micro and nanoparticle substrates. Previously, SUVs of bis-SorbPC were fused with planar silica substrates [15, 16], curved capillary surfaces [29, 30, 39], and ca. 100 nm silica nanoparticles [40] to form supported, polymerized phospholipid bilayers, suggesting that fusing bis-SorbPC SUVs with silica microparticles will yield a supported bilayer structure.
Figure 1 shows fluorescent images of silica and lipid-coated silica particles after staining with a lipid indicator, FM1-43. Previous studies with FM1-43 have illustrated high levels of fluorescence after intercalation of the dye into lipid membranes [29, 39, 41]. For comparison, both bis-SorbPC and DOPC, a natural lipid, were used to evaluate the stability of bilayer coatings. Natural phospholipid bilayers are unstable when exposed to common column preparation and/or separation conditions, including organic solvents, air bubbles, and shear forces [15–19]; thus, the stability of lipid bilayer coatings were examined first to ensure the bilayers would be compatible with separation systems. Silica (non-coated) particles, DOPC-coated particles, and poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles exhibited low fluorescence background prior to addition of FM1-43. After incubation with FM1-43, the fluorescence intensity of DOPC- and poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles increased, indicating the presence of lipid membranes on the surfaces of these particles. Additionally, the uniform fluorescence intensity indicates the presence of a bilayer membrane on the particle surface. To test the stability of the lipid bilayer coating, particles were exposed to surfactant (triton X-100) or a high concentration of organic solvent (50 % (v/v) acetonitrile, ACN), washed, and then stained with FM1-43. These conditions, while more harsh than would be expected for most analyses involving lipid stationary phases, were chosen to provide a clear indication of the stability enhancements obtained by utilizing poly(lipid) membranes. The fluorescence intensity of DOPC-coated particles decreased significantly after exposure to surfactant or organic solvents, indicating that the lipid bilayers were degraded. However, when poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles were exposed to either insult, the fluorescence intensity was retained after staining with FM1-43, indicating the enhanced bilayer stability after polymerization of the lipids.
Figure 1.

Representative fluorescence images of silica particles, DOPC-coated particles, and poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles, with UV, K2S2O8 / NaHSO3, and (NH4)2S2O8 / NaHSO3 referring to the bis-SorbPC polymerization method. After incubation with FM1-43, DOPC-coated and poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles exhibit increased fluorescence, indicating the presence of lipid bilayers on the surface of the particles. After exposing the lipid-coated particles to surfactant (triton X-100) or organic solvent (ACN), washing, and staining with FM1-43, only the poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles exhibit fluorescence, illustrating that the poly(bis-SorbPC) coatings are maintained after exposure to these insults and have greater chemical stability than unpolymerized DOPC coatings.
To increase the throughput of particle characterization, flow cytometry was used to study large groups of particles since the scatter associated with each particle could be correlated with the fluorescence. Table 1 shows the mean fluorescence intensity of silica, DOPC-coated, and poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles in the presence and absence of FM1-43 and after treatment with surfactant or organic solvent. This data correlates well with the images presented in Figure 1. Silica particles had low fluorescence under all conditions since lipids were not present on the particle surface. DOPC-coated particles exhibited increased fluorescence when stained with FM1-43 due to the presence of a lipid membrane; however, the bilayer coatings were unstable after exposure to surfactants or organic solvents as evidenced by the decreased fluorescence intensity following these conditions. When bis-SorbPC was polymerized using the UV or either redox initiation approach (with K2S2O8 or (NH4)2S2O8 and NaHSO3), the lipid coating resulted in fluorescence when stained with FM1-43. Additionally, the fluorescence was retained after exposure to surfactants or organic solvents, illustrating the enhanced stability of the bilayer coating after polymerization.
Table 1.
Chemical stability of lipid bilayer coatings analyzed by flow cytometry
| Particle Fluorescence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica Particle Coating | No Treatment | + FM1-43 | + Triton X-100 + FM1-43 | + 50% ACN + FM1-43 |
| None | 3 ± 3 | 4 ± 4 | 8 ± 8 | 5 ± 4 |
| DOPC | 3 ± 1 | 670 ± 190 | 23 ± 19 | 46 ± 54 |
| UV poly(bis-SorbPC) | 4 ± 2 | 890 ± 100 | 630 ± 140 | 730 ± 100 |
| K2S2O8 / NaHSO3 poly(bis-SorbPC) | 3 ± 1 | 1000 ± 160 | 1100 ± 280 | 1200 ± 230 |
| (NH4)2S2O8 / NaHSO3 poly(bis-SorbPC) | 3 ± 1 | 1300 ± 290 | 1400 ± 230 | 1400 ± 300 |
3.2. Temporal and physical stability of polymerized bis-SorbPC stationary phase
In addition to examining the stability of the bilayer coatings against common chemical insults, the long-term stability was analyzed by imaging. Particles were stained with FM1-43 prior to each experiment. Images were collected on the day of preparation, and again on days 15 and 30. Between experiments, particles were dispersed in PBS, pH 7.4, and stored at 4 °C. The data in Figure 2 shows that the poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles exhibited similar fluorescence intensities over the 30 day period, suggesting that the membranes were retained throughout this time frame. The polymerized bilayer coatings were also stable to surfactants and organic solvents over this duration, signifying that storage does not affect the stability of the bilayer coating. For the DOPC-coated particles, the fluorescence intensity was quantified only on the first day. Images of DOPC-coated particles collected on day 15 showed few fluorescent particles, indicating the bilayer coatings degraded during storage. The temporal stability of the poly(bis-SorbPC) membranes on silica particles was further supported by flow cytometry (Supplementary data, Figure S-1), where there was a consistent, but small decrease at day 30. The long-term stability of poly(bis-SorbPC) membrane coatings will allow for storage of chromatography columns without stationary phase degradation.
Figure 2.

Long-term stability of lipid bilayer coatings on silica particles measured by fluorescence microscopy using FM1-43 as a membrane stain. UV, K2S2O8 / NaHSO3, and (NH4)2S2O8 / NaHSO3 refer to the method used for polymerization of bis-SorbPC. Particles were exposed to surfactant (triton X-100) or organic solvent (ACN), washed, and stained with FM1-43 before imaging. For all poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles the maintained fluorescence after exposure to chemical insults over a 30 day period illustrates that the polymerized-bilayer coatings are temporally stable. Particles were stored dispersed in PBS at 4 °C between timepoints.
The physical stability of the bilayer coatings were analyzed by imaging capillaries packed with UV poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated silica particles, DOPC-coated silica particles, or bare silica particles in the presence or absence of FM1-43 (Figure 3). Only the capillaries packed with poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles showed high fluorescence intensities after exposure to FM1-43, indicating that the polymerized bilayers were stable to the shear forces required to pack capillary columns. Conversely, the capillaries packed with DOPC-coated particles exhibited diminished fluorescence, suggesting that DOPC lipid bilayers were removed by the shear forces generated during packing. Additional particle images (Supplementary data, Figure S-2) illustrate that the poly(bis-SorbPC) coatings were stable when simultaneously exposed to high pressure (2900 psi) and organic solvents (25 – 40% ACN).
Figure 3.

Fluorescent images of capillaries (75 μm i.d., 360 μm o.d.) packed with UV poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles (A, B), bare silica particles (C, D), and DOPC-coated particles (E, F). Capillaries were imaged with (A, C, E) or without (B, D, F) FM1-43. (G) Mean fluorescence intensity data for columns A – F. The fluorescent intensities illustrate that the poly(bis-SorbPC)-bilayer coatings are retained on the particles after packing, whereas the DOPC bilayers are degraded, likely due to the shear forces associated with packing columns.
3.3. Improved polymerization conditions
The imaging and flow cytometry studies presented above show that poly(bis-SorbPC) membranes deposited on silica particles exhibit enhanced chemical, temporal, and physical stabilities compared to non-polymerized lipid bilayers (DOPC). However, aggregates of particles were observed after UV polymerization and these were exacerbated following membrane destabilizing conditions, e.g. surfactant or organic rinse (Figure 1). Interestingly, when bis-SorbPC was polymerized using either redox initiation, no aggregates were observed (Figure 1). Previous work by Ross et. al. showed that poly(bis-SorbPC) PSLBs that were prepared via UV or redox methods yielded different polymer structures [16]. In general, redox polymerization yielded a greater degree of crosslinking between the two leaflets of the bilayer and a longer polymer network (degree of polymerization, Xn = 40 – 600) compared to UV initiation (Xn = 3 – 10) [16]. Thus, when UV polymerized particles were exposed to surfactant or organic solvent, the lower crosslinking density of the polymer may be insufficient to prevent the loss of the outer leaflet of the bilayer, leading to aggregation of particles via the interaction of exposed lipid tails (see Supplementary data, Figure S-3 for a schematic representation).
A highly crosslinked polymer results when K2S2O8 and NaHSO3 are used as the redox couple to polymerize bis-SorbPC (Xn = 40 – 600) [15, 16]. The initiation reactions between S2O82− and HSO3− are shown below [42].
| (1) |
| (2) |
Bisulfate ( , pKa 1.9) is produced as a byproduct of initiation, resulting in an acidic solution. When bis-SorbPC lipids undergo redox-initiated polymerization, the decrease in pH does not affect the lipid structure or the resulting polymer; however, if future applications of this stationary phase material are to require membrane proteins incorporated into bis-SorbPC membranes prior to redox polymerization, the resulting decrease in pH may negatively affect protein conformation. Thus, we sought to identify conditions that would be more compatible with our long term goal of membrane protein-functionalized matrices. When (NH4)2S2O8 was substituted for K2S2O8 in the redox reaction, a solution with approximately neutral pH resulted. The mixture could be buffered to pH 7.4 while still achieving polymerized membranes with no aggregation or other deleterious effects observed in stability studies (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Though the mechanistic differences between the redox reactions were not studied, redox polymerization using (NH4)2S2O8 should provide solution conditions that are more compatible for future incorporation of membrane proteins; thus, redox polymerizations using (NH4)2S2O8 and NaHSO3 were employed for preparing poly(bis-SorbPC) coatings for frontal chromatographic analyses.
3.4. Frontal Chromatographic Analyses
To demonstrate the efficacy of poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated silica following packing into capillary columns, frontal analyses of three lipophilic small molecules that are known to cross cell membranes were performed using capillary LC. Figure 4 shows representative frontal chromatograms of acetylsalicylic (A), benzoic (B), and salicylic (C) acids using capillary columns packed with bare silica (black) or poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated silica (red) particles. The chemical structures for the analytes are shown in Supplementary data (Figure S-4). Retention times were defined as the maximum of the distribution in the first derivative plot (dashed lines) [43]. In each case, a clear increase in retention was observed when analytes were introduced to the poly(bis-SorbPC) stationary phase compared to silica stationary phase particles, suggesting lipophilic retention. Table 2 provides mean retention times and repeatability for the lipophilic analytes on silica and poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated stationary phases. Retention times increased with statistical significance (P < 0.0001) on the poly(bis-SorbPC) stationary phase relative to bare silica for each analyte.
Figure 4.

Chromatographic frontal analyses of lipophilic small molecules. Frontal analyses of acetylsalicylic acid (A), benzoic acid (B), and salicylic acid (C) show increased retention on poly (bis-SorbPC) stationary phases (red) when compared to bare silica stationary phases (black). Retention times were determined from first derivative plots (dashed lines).
Table 2.
Frontal chromatography retention analyses
| Analyte | Silica | poly(bis-SorbPC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retention time (min) | RSD (%) | Retention time (min) | RSD (%) | |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 10.1 ± 0.2 | 1.7 | 14.6 ± 0.6 | 3.8 |
| Benzoic acid | 9.6 ± 0.2 | 1.9 | 14.1 ± 0.1 | 0.9 |
| Salicylic acid | 9.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 | 14.3 ± 0.1 | 0.4 |
Importantly, column performance was highly-repeatable. Frontal chromatograms yielded retention time relative standard deviations less than 4% for acetylsalicylic acid and less than 1% for benzoic acid and salicylic acid (n ≥ 4) over the course of 1 week, values that are on par with silica particles lacking a coating. This is particularly noteworthy when considering the operating pressure for each run exceeded 2700 psi. Thus, not only do poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles withstand slurry packing, but also high pressures associated with the separation, which would delaminate unpolymerized lipid coatings and lipid architectures. These findings extend the application of lipid membrane affinity chromatography to conditions amenable to high efficiency separations which we expect to enable screening of highly complex drug-candidate mixtures for their lipid membrane interactions.
4. Conclusions
Poly(bis-SorbPC) coatings on silica particles exhibited increased chemical, temporal, and physical stability compared to unpolymerized phospholipid bilayer coatings (DOPC). Redox-initiated polymerization yielded bilayers with greater stability than UV poly(bis-SorbPC) coatings, which aggregated after exposure to chemical insults. Additionally, chromatographic frontal analyses of small molecule analytes showed repeatable lipophilic retention on poly(bis-SorbPC)-coated particles polymerized with a neutral redox polymerization mixture, (NH4)2S2O8 / NaHSO3, indicating that the highly stabilized lipid membrane environment of the poly(lipid) stationary phase presents an excellent platform for further development of biomimetic stationary phases. The current platform will enable high efficiency analyses of lipophilic drugs to determine partition coefficients as these molecules interact with phospholipid bilayers. Future work in developing this stationary phase will target improved stationary phase capacity by utilizing porous silica particles, and incorporating membrane proteins for receptor affinity chromatography.
Poly(bis-SorbPC) stationary phases show enhanced stability and high repeatability compared to ILCs. The presence of a full phospholipid bilayer may also make poly(lipid) stationary phases a more biologically relevant mimic of the cellular membrane than the lipid monolayers found in IAMs. We expect these key differences from established lipid membrane stationary phase materials will present an excellent opportunity for new affinity chromatography approaches to study physiological and pharmaceutical modulators of phospholipid membranes and/or membrane proteins.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
A polymerized phospholipid bilayer-based chromatographic stationary phase is characterized and demonstrated.
The stationary phase survives chemical and physical insults inherent in high pressure capillary liquid chromatography, with a stable shelf life of at least 30 days.
Frontal chromatography shows lipophilic retention of acetylsalicylic, benzoic, and salicylic acids.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (GM095763) and National Science Foundation (CHE-0518702). ESG was supported by a graduate training fellowship through the Biological Chemistry Program (NIH T32 GM008804). Flow cytometry data was collected in a core facility funded in part by the National Cancer Institute (NIC CCSG CA023074).
Footnotes
6. Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Reference List
- 1.Wolcke J, Ullmann D. Miniaturized HTS technologies - uHTS. Drug Discov Today. 2001;6:637–646. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(01)01807-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gallagher ES, Mansfield E, Aspinwall CA. Stabilized phospholipid membranes in chromatography: toward membrane protein-functionalized stationary phases. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:2223–2229. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-7545-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moaddel R, Wainer IW. Conformational mobility of immobilized proteins. J Pharmaceut Biomed. 2007;43:399–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wiedmer SK, Jussila MS, Riekkola ML. Phospholipids and liposomes in liquid chromatographic and capillary electromigration techniques. Trends Anal Chem. 2004;23:562–582. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lundahl P, Yang Q. Liposome chromatography: liposomes immobilized in gel beads as a stationary phase for aqueous column chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1991;544:283–304. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)83992-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang C, Li J, Xu L, Shi ZG. Fast immobilized liposome chromatography based on penetrable silica microspheres for screening and analysis of permeable compounds. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1233:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moravcova D, Planeta J, Wiedmer SK. Image Processing with ImageJ. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1317:159. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang Q, Liu XY, Ajiki S, Hara M, Lundahl P, Miyake J. Avidin-biotin immobilization of unilamellar liposomes in gel beads for chromatographic analysis of drug-membrane partitioning. J Chromatogr B. 1998;707:131–141. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00620-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu XY, Yang Q, Nakamura C, Miyake J. Avidin-biotin-immobilized liposome column for chromatographic fluorescence on-line analysis of solute-membrane interactions. J Chromatogr B. 2001;750:51–60. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00427-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Krause E, Dathe M, Wieprecht T, Bienert M. Noncovalent immobilized artificial membrane chromatography, an improved method for describing peptide-lipid bilayer interactions. J Chromatogr A. 1999;849:125–133. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00528-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Proverbio D, Roos C, Beyermann M, Orban E, Dotsch V, Bernhard F. Functional properties of cell-free expressed human endothelin A and endothelin B receptors in artificial membrane environments. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1828:2182–2192. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang Q, Lundahl P. Immobilized Proteoliposome Affinity Chromatography for Quantitative Analysis of Specific Interactions between Solutes and Membrane Proteins. Interaction of Cytochalasin B and D-Glucose with the Glucose Transporter Glut1. Biochemistry. 1995;34:7289–7294. doi: 10.1021/bi00022a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moaddel R, Rosenberg A, Spelman K, Frazier J, Frazier C, Nocerino S, Brizzi A, Mugnaini C, Wainer IW. Development and characterization of immobilized cannabinoid receptor (CB1/CB2) open tubular column for on-line screening. Anal Biochem. 2011;412:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moaddel R, Wainer IW. Development of immobilized membrane-based affinity columns for use in the online characterization of membrane bound proteins and for targeted affinity isolations. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;564:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ross EE, Bondurant B, Spratt T, Conboy JC, O’Brien DF, Saavedra SS. Formation of Self-Assembled, Air-Stable Lipid Bilayer Membranes on Solid Supports. Langmuir. 2001;17:2305–2307. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ross EE, Rozanski LJ, Spratt T, Liu S, O’Brien DF, Saavedra SS. Planar Supported Lipid Bilayer Polymers Formed by Vesicle Fusion. 1. Influence of Diene Monomer Structure and Polymerization Method on Film Properties. Langmuir. 2003;19:1752–1765. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Michel R, Subramaniam V, McArthur SL, Bondurant B, D’Ambruoso GD, Hall HK, Jr, Brown MF, Ross EE, Saavedra SS, Castner DG. Ultra-High Vacuum Surface Analysis Study of Rhodopsin Incorporation into Supported Lipid Bilayers. Langmuir. 2008;24:4901–4906. doi: 10.1021/la800037r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Subramaniam V, D’Ambruoso GD, Hall HK, Jr, Wysocki RJ, Jr, Brown MF, Saavedra SS. Reconstitution of Rhodopsin into Polymerizable Planar Supported Lipid Bilayers: Influence of Dienoyl Monomer Structure on Photoactivation. Langmuir. 2008;24:11067–11075. doi: 10.1021/la801835g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Subramaniam V, Alves ID, Salgado GFJ, Lau PW, Wysocki RJ, Jr, Salamon Z, Tollin G, Hruby VJ, Brown MF, Saavedra SS. Rhodopsin Reconstituted into a Planar-Supported Lipid Bilayer Retains Photoactivity after Cross-Linking Polymerization of Lipid Monomers. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;127:5320–5321. doi: 10.1021/ja0423973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Taillardat-Bertschinger A, Carrupt PA, Barbato F, Testa B. Immobilized Artificial Membrane HPLC in Drug Research. J Med Chem. 2003;46:655–665. doi: 10.1021/jm020265j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang CY, Cai SJ, Liu HL, Pidgeon C. Immobilized Artificial Membranes - screens for drug membrane interactions. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 1997;23:229. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pidgeon C, Venkataram UV. Immobilized Artificial Membrane Chromatography: Supports Composed of Membrane Lipids. Anal Biochem. 1989;176:36. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90269-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu H, Ong S, Glunz L, Pidgeon C. Predicting Drug-Membrane Interactions by HPLC: Structural Requirements of Chromatographic Surfaces. Anal Chem. 1995;67:3550–3557. doi: 10.1021/ac00115a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barbato F, di Martino G, Grumetto L, La Rotonda MI. Prediction of drug-membrane interactions by IAM-HPLC: effects of different phospholipid stationary phases on the partition of bases. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22:261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2004.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang Y, Xiao Y, Kellar KJ, Wainer IW. Immobilized Nicotinic Receptor Stationary Phase for On-Line Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Drug-Receptor Affinities. Anal Biochem. 1998;264:22–25. doi: 10.1006/abio.1998.2828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beigi F, Wainer IW. Synthesis of Immobilized G Protein-Coupled Receptor Chromatographic Stationary Phases: Characterization of Immobilized μ and κ Opioid Receptors. Anal Chem. 2003;75:4480–4485. doi: 10.1021/ac034385q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moaddel R, Wainer IW. The preparation and development of cellular membrane affinity chromatography columns. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:197–205. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gottschalk I, Lagerquist C, Zuo SS, Lundqvist A, Lundahl P. Immobilized-biomembrane affinity chromatography for binding studies of membrane proteins. J Chromatogr B. 2002;768:31–40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00483-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mansfield E, Ross EE, Aspinwall CA. Preparation and Characterization of Cross-Linked Phospholipid Bilayer Capillary Coatings for Protein Separations. Anal Chem. 2007;79:3135–3141. doi: 10.1021/ac0618829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Adem SM, Mansfield E, Keogh JP, Hall HK, Jr, Aspinwall CA. Practical considerations for preparing polymerized phospholipid bilayer coatings for protein separations. Anal Chim Acta. 2013;772:93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ross EE, Mansfield E, Aspinwall CA. In Situ Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Chemical Patterns in Fused Silica Separation Capillaries with Polymerized Phospholipids. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:16756–16757. doi: 10.1021/ja0539995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lamparski H, Liman U, Barry JA, Frankel DA, Ramaswami V, Brown MF, O’Brien DF. Photoinduced Destabilization of Liposomes. Biochemistry. 1992;31:685–694. doi: 10.1021/bi00118a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cheng Z, D’Ambruoso GD, Aspinwall CA. Stabilized Porous Phospholipid Nanoshells. Langmuir. 2006;22:9507–9511. doi: 10.1021/la061542i. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andreolini F, Borra C, Novotny M. Preparation and Evaluation of Slurry-Packed Capillary Columns for Normal-Phase Liquid Chromatography. Anal Chem. 1987;59:2428–2432. doi: 10.1021/ac00146a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maruska A, Pyell U. Capillary electrochromatography: normal-phase mode using silica gel and cellulose-based packing materials. J Chromatogr A. 1997;782:167–174. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krause K, Girod M, Chankvetadze B, Blaschke G. Enantioseparations in normal- and reversed-phase nano-high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography using polyacrylamide and polysaccharide derivatives as chiral stationary phases. J Chromatogr A. 1999;837:51–63. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004;11:36–42. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brian AA, McConnell HM. Allogeneic stimulation of cytotoxic T cells by supported planar membranes. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:6159–6163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gallagher ES, Adem SM, Bright LK, Calderon IAC, Mansfield E, Aspinwall CA. Hybrid phospholipid bilayer coatings for separations of cationic proteins in capillary zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2014;35:1099–1105. doi: 10.1002/elps.201300537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Senarath-Yapa MD, Phimphivong S, Coym JW, Wirth MJ, Aspinwall CA, Saavedra SS. Preparation and Characterization of Poly(lipid)-Coated, Fluorophore-Doped Silica Nanoparticles for Biolabeling and Cellular Imaging. Langmuir. 2007;23:12624–12633. doi: 10.1021/la701917w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wróbel A, Bobrowska-Hägerstrand M, Lindqvist C, Hägerstrand H. Monitoring of membrane phospholipid scrambling in human erythrocytes and K562 cells with FM1-43 -A comparison with Annexin V-FITC. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters. 2014;19:262–276. doi: 10.2478/s11658-014-0195-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sarac AS. Redox polymerization. Prog Polym Sci. 1999;24:1149–1204. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Funasaki N, Ishikawa S, Neya S. Stepwise Self-Association of Penicillin V As Deduced by Frontal Derivative Chromatography. Langmuir. 2000;16:5584–5587. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
