Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2015 Aug 7;201(2):139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2015.07.005

Functional role of lysine 12 in Leishmania major AQP1

Mansi Sharma 1, Goutam Mandal 1, Srotoswati Mandal 1, Hiranmoy Bhattacharjee 1, Rita Mukhopadhyay 1,*
PMCID: PMC4706639  NIHMSID: NIHMS720151  PMID: 26259900

Abstract

Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin (AQP1) is an adventitious metalloid channel that allows the bidirectional movement of arsenite and antimonite. Here we demonstrate that AQP1 is subjected to proteasome-dependent degradation. Treatment of Leishmania promastigotes with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 resulted in increased AQP1 accumulation. Site-directed mutagenesis in AQP1 revealed that alteration of lysine 12 to either alanine or arginine improves protein stability. AQP1 expression is stabilized by mitogen-activated protein kinase 2 (MPK2). Cells expressing a dominant-negative MPK2 mutant exhibited severely reduced AQP1 expression, which could be reversed upon addition of MG132. Interestingly, the dominant- negative MPK2 mutant could not destabilize either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R. While stabilization of AQP1 by MPK2 leads to its relocalization from flagellum to the entire surface of the parasite, altered AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R was restricted to flagellum only. Our data demonstrate that lysine 12 is targeted for proteasomal degradation of AQP1 and plays an integral role in subcellular localization of AQP1 as well as its interaction with MPK2. This work also raises the possibility that a strategy combining antimonial with a proteasome inhibitor may be an effective combination regimen against diverse forms of leishmaniasis.

Keywords: Antimonite, aquaglyceroporin, Leishmania, post-translational regulation, ubiquitination, volume regulation

1. Introduction

Leishmaniasis is caused by parasites from the genus Leishmania that are transmitted through the bite of infected Phlebotomus sandflies in the Old World and Lutzomyia in the New World. There are several different forms of leishmaniasis. The most prevalent ones are the cutaneous leishmaniasis, resulting in skin ulcers, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, affecting the nose, mouth, throat cavities, and visceral leishmaniasis, targeting the internal organs, typically spleen, liver, and bone marrow. The first line compounds against all forms of leishmaniasis are the two pentavalent antimony (Sb(V)) containing drugs, sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam®) and meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime®). It is postulated that pentavalent antimonials are reduced to the more active trivalent form (Sb(III)) in the cytosol of host macrophage by a putative Sb(V) reductase. Alternatively, the drug may be taken up by the parasite and reduced to Sb(III) by an endogenous antimony reductase (1).

In order for Sb(III) to be effective as a drug, it needs to enter the parasite. Aquaglyceroporins (AQPs) have been identified as uptake systems for trivalent metalloids in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (2). The genome of Leishmania major, a causative agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis, encodes for five AQPs: AQP1, AQPα, AQPβ, AQPγ and AQPδ. Of the five, only AQP1 is involved in the uptake of Sb(III), the activated form of Pentostam® and Glucantime® (3). We have earlier shown that disruption of one of the two AQP1 alleles in L. major conferred a 10-fold increase in Sb(III) resistance (3). AQP1 mRNA levels are significantly less in Sb(III)-resistant L. major and Leishmania tarentolae cells, indicating that downregulation of AQP1 leads to drug resistance (4). These inferences were corroborated in field isolates from Nepal (5) and India (6). In general, Leishmania species responsible for cutaneous leishmaniasis are more sensitive to Sb(III) than those responsible for visceral leishmaniasis. This species-specific sensitivity to metalloid is directly proportional to AQP1 mRNA levels. The 3'-untranslated region of AQP1 regulates its mRNA stability, which defines the distinct antimonial sensitivity of each species (7).

Although AQP1 functions as an adventitious drug transporter, its physiological roles are water and solute transport. AQP1 allows the passage of water, glycerol, glyceraldehyde, dihydroxyacetone and sugar alcohols (8). While the structure of L. major AQP1 is yet to be elucidated, molecular modeling based on the three-dimensional structure of Plasmodium falciparum AQP (PfAQP) (9), along with structure-function correlations of L. major AQP1 have defined the residues lining the outer mouth of the channel (Fig. S1). Glutamate 152 on the second extracellular loop near the pore mouth helps the channel differentiate between antimonite and glycerol (10). Mutations in alanine 163 in the same loop altered the permeability to antimonite without any significant loss in water or solute conductivity (11).

AQP1 is expressed exclusively in the flagellum of promastigotes (extracellular form in sand fly vector); whereas in amastigotes (intracellular form in vertebrate host) it is localized to the flagellar pocket, rudimentary flagellum and contractile vacuoles. The promastigote flagellum is necessary for parasite migration and attachment within the sand fly gut, while the rudimentary amastigote flagellum is proposed to be involved in sensory perception and cellular organization, thus playing a critical role for intracellular survival of Leishmania within the vector and vertebrate host (12). Consequent to its flagellar localization, AQP1 is critical in the movement of Leishmania towards an osmotic gradient. AQP1 also plays an important role in the regulation of cellular volume of the parasite following an osmotic stress (8).

AQP1 activity is post-translationally modulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase 2 (MPK2). MPK2 phosphorylates AQP1 at threonine 197 that reduces AQP1 protein turnover and improves AQP1 stability. While AQP1 is localized to the flagellum of promastigotes, upon phosphorylation, it is relocalized to the entire surface of the parasite. Lysine 42 of MPK2 is critical for its kinase activity. Expression of MPK2K42A exerts a dominant-negative effect on AQP1 expression by reducing its stability (13). In this study we show that the dominant-negative effect is due to enhanced proteasomal degradation of AQP1. Our results show that proteasome inhibition rapidly induces expression of AQP1, inhibits degradation of AQP1 protein, and enhances parasite sensitivity to Sb(III).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cells and transfectants

The Leishmania donovani LdBob cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Stephen Beverley (14). LdBob cells were grown as promastigotes as described earlier (8, 13). While an AQP1 null-mutant in L. major has only recently been developed at Ouellette laboratory (15), the LdBob cell line was chosen based on a logical extension of our previous studies (7, 8, 10, 11, 13). Also, LdBob cells have the lowest AQP1 mRNA levels, are highly resistant to Sb(III), show lowest Sb(III) accumulation, and exhibit poor osmoregulatory activity (7), which makes LdBob as good as an AQP1 knockdown strain.

Altered AQP1 and MPK2 constructs were transfected into LdBob cells as described earlier (13). All transfectants were maintained in the presence of 300 μg ml−1 hygromycin B (Life Technologies) and 60 μg ml−1 geneticin (Life Technologies). Plasmids and transfectants used in this study are described in Table S1.

2.2. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis

Mutations in L. major AQP1 gene were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). The mutagenic oligonucleotides used for both strands and the respective changes introduced (underlined) are as follows: K12A, 5’-GAGGACCAACACGAGAGTGCGCGAAACTTCATGTCGCAG-3’ and 5’-CTGCGACATGAAGTTTCGCGCACTCTCGTGTTGGTCCTC-3’; K12R, 5’-GACCAACACGAGAGTAGGCGAAACTTCATGTCG-3’ and 5’-CGACATGAAGTTTCGCCTACTCTCGTGTTGGTC-3’. Each mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing (Eton Bioscience). Altered AQP1 was digested with HindIII and XbaI and inserted into the HindIII-XbaI sites of pSP72αhygroα.

2.3. Antimonite sensitivity assays

Antimonite sensitivity was determined by diluting log phase promastigote transfectants to 106 cells ml−1 in a culture medium containing various concentrations of Sb(III) in the form of potassium antimonyl tartrate (Sigma-Aldrich). Following 72 h incubation, cell growth was monitored from the absorbance at 600 nm using a Spectramax 340 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Percentage survival was plotted against Sb(III) concentrations and EC50 was determined using SigmaPlot 12.0. Each assay was performed at least three times in triplicates. Error bars were calculated from the mean ± SE.

2.4. Antimonite accumulation assays

Log phase LdBob promastigotes were washed twice with PBS, pH 7.4 (Invitrogen) and suspended in PBS at a density of 108 cells ml−1. Promastigotes were then incubated with 10 μM Sb(III) for 10 min at room temperature. A 200 μl portion was filtered through a 0.2-μm nitrocellulose filter (EMD Millipore) and the filter washed once with 5 ml of ice-cold PBS. The filters were digested with 0.4 ml of concentrated HNO3 (69–70%) (EM Science) for 1 h at 70°C, allowed to cool to room temperature, and diluted with high-pressure liquid chromatography grade water (Sigma-Aldrich) to produce a final concentration of HNO3 of approximately 3%, and then analyzed by a SCIEX ELAN® DRC-e inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (PerkinElmer). Standard solutions were made in the range of 0.5–10 ppb in 3% HNO3 using antimony standards (Ultra Scientific). Each transport experiment was repeated at least three times with duplicate samples. Error bars were calculated from the mean ± SE.

2.5. Cell volume measurements

Log phase LdBob promastigotes were washed twice in PBS and re-suspended at a density of 109 cells ml−1. One hundred microliter portions of the cell suspension were transferred to a microtiter plate. Hypo-osmotic shock was induced by dilution of the isotonic cell suspension with an equal volume of deionized water to obtain a final osmolarity of 150 mOsm and was confirmed with an osmometer (Precision Systems). The absorbance at 550 nm was recorded every 15 s for 3 min in a Spectramax 340 microplate reader. A decrease in absorbance corresponds to an increase in cell volume. Isosmotic control experiments consisted of dilution of cell suspensions with appropriate volumes of isosmotic buffer. Each experiment was repeated at least three times with triplicate samples. Error bars were calculated from the mean ± SE.

2.6. MG132 treatment of LdBob transfectants

MG132 is a specific, potent, and cell-permeable proteasome inhibitor (16). To examine the effect of MG132 (EMD Millipore) on AQP1 expression, LdBob transfectants were pretreated with or without 10 μM MG132 for 48 h. After the treatment cells were lysed and plasma membrane-enriched fraction isolated as described earlier (8). The total protein content of plasma membrane-enriched fraction was determined by a filter assay method (17). Fifty microgram protein sample was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on 12% acrylamide gels and transferred to a Schleicher & Schuell Protran® nitrocellulose transfer membrane (PerkinElmer). Western blot analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s directions using a Western Lightning Ultra kit (PerkinElmer) and an affinity-purified AQP1 antiserum (8).

Antimonite sensitivity of LdBob transfectants following MG132 treatment was determined by diluting 2 x 106 cells ml−1 in a fresh culture medium containing 10 μM MG132 and increasing concentrations of Sb(III) in the form of potassium antimonyl tartrate (Sigma-Aldrich). EC50 was estimated through manual cell counting with a hemocytometer. To estimate Sb(III) accumulation, MG132 treated cells were washed once with PBS containing 10 μM MG132, and resuspended in PBS at a density of 108 cells ml−1. Cells were then incubated with 10 μM Sb(III) for 10 min at room temperature. Sb(III) accumulation was measured as described above. Experiments were repeated twice with triplicate samples each time. Error bars were calculated from the mean ± SE.

2.7. Western blot analysis

The flagellar and pellicular plasma membrane fractions from LdBob transfectants were isolated as described earlier (8, 13). The purity of flagellar preparation was monitored by phase-contrast microscopy (~ 99% pure by microscopic count). Either 25 μg of flagellar or 50 μg of pellicular membrane preparations were electrophoresed into 12% SDS-PAGE and probed with an affinity-purified AQP1 antiserum (8, 13).

Mid-log phase LdBob promastigotes were treated in the presence or absence of protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (70 μg ml−1; Sigma-Aldrich) and harvested at different time points (13). Flagellar membrane fraction was isolated and AQP1 expression analyzed by Western blotting (13). For AQP1WT + MPK2K42A cells treated with cycloheximide, 70 μg of flagellar membrane preparation was loaded onto 12% SDS-PAGE. For all other cell types described in Fig. 4, 25 μg of membrane preparation was loaded in each lane. The experiment was repeated twice and relative AQP1 levels were evaluated by densitometric analysis using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Fig. 4. Turnover of AQP1.

Fig. 4

Mid-log phase LdBob transfectants were treated with 70 μg ml−1 cycloheximide (CHX). Cells were harvested at the indicated times following CHX addition. The flagellar membrane fraction was isolated as described in Materials and methods. All lanes were loaded with 25 μg of flagellar protein except AQP1WT + MPK2K42A which was loaded with 70 μg. AQP1 expression was analyzed by Western blotting using anti-AQP1 antibody.

2.8. Immunofluorescence analysis

Late-log-phase LdBob promastigotes (~5 x 105 cells) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS overnight at 4°C. The cells were washed twice with PBS, transferred to teflon coated immunofluorescence slides (Polysciences), and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Na2PO4, 50 mM glycine, pH 7.2, for 2 min. After blocking with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min, cells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with AQP1 antiserum (1:300 in 1% BSA). The primary antibody was removed by washing three times with 1% BSA followed by incubation with the monoclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) 1:500 for another hour. After three washes with 1% BSA, the slides were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Life Technologies) (1:1,000 in 1% BSA) and Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies) (1:2,000 in 1% BSA) for 1 h. Finally, the cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (0.1 mg ml−1 final concentration) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, the slides washed three times with 1% BSA, and once with sterile water. The slides were mounted in Vectashield® Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories) and examined by a DeltaVision™ Elite Microscopy System (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) with a 60x oil immersion objective.

3. Results

3.1. Enhancement of AQP1 expression upon proteasome inhibition

The effect of a cell-permeable proteasome inhibitor MG132 on AQP1 expression was examined. LdBob cells transfected with AQP1WT were incubated with or without 10 μM MG132 for forty eight hours. Treatment with MG132 led to morphological changes. Although cell viability was not compromised, cells became small and round with severely stunted flagella (Fig. S2). Changes in cell shape upon MG132 treatment have been reported in mammalian cells (18, 19). In the absence of MG132, expression of AQP1 is too low in total membrane fractions to be detected by immunoblotting (8). In contrast, AQP1 expression was noted in MG132 treated cells (Fig. 1A) indicating that, MG132-induced inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway leads to an increased accumulation of AQP1. Consistent with an increase in AQP1 expression, MG132 treated cells were three times more sensitive to Sb(III) (Fig. 1B), and accumulated twice as much metalloid than untreated cells (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1. AQP1 is subjected to proteasome-mediated degradation.

Fig. 1

(A) LdBob transfectants were incubated in the absence ( ) or presence (+) of 10 μM MG132 and the plasma membrane fractions prepared as described in Materials and methods. Each lane was loaded with 50 μg of total membrane protein and tested for the presence of AQP1 by Western blotting using an anti-AQP1 antibody; (B) Sb(III) sensitivity (EC50) of LdBob transfectants ± MG132; (C) Sb(III) uptake in LdBob transfectants ± MG132. Data were expressed as mean ± SE of three independent experiments in triplicate.

AQP1 expression is positively regulated by mitogen activated protein kinase, MPK2. MPK2-mediated phosphorylation of AQP1 occurs on residue Thr197, and such posttranslational modification serves to stabilize AQP1 half-life (13). Lys42 of MPK2 is critical for its kinase activity. Expression of a dominant-negative MPK2K42A mutant in LdBob cells showed a significant reduction in AQP1 expression (13). However, addition of MG132 in cells co-expressing AQP1WT and MPK2K42A restored AQP1 expression (Fig. 1A) suggesting that, the reduction in AQP1 protein level was caused by enhanced proteasomal degradation. Consequent to restoration of AQP1 expression, a 10-fold increase in hypersensitivity to Sb(III) (Fig. 1B) and a 4-fold increase in metalloid accumulation (Fig. 1C) was noted in cells treated with MG132 versus untreated cells.

3.2. Putative ubiquitination site of AQP1

Proteasome mediated degradation and/or endocytosis of membrane proteins including aquaporins takes place by ubiquitination at the critical lysine exposed to cytosol (20, 21). AQP1 shares 32% identity and 50% similarity with Plasmodium falciparum aquaglyceroporin (PfAQP). A topology prediction of AQP1 based on the crystal structure of PfAQP (9) predicted the AQP1 N- and C-termini to be intracellular (Fig. S1) (10). Similarly, the TMHMM Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) predicts a cytosolic location for AQP1 N- and C-termini. AQP1 has six lysine residues located at position 12, 114, 138, 146, 157 and 203 of its primary sequence (Fig. S3). Only Lys12 was predicted by UbPred: Predictor of Protein Ubiquitination Sites program (http://www.ubpred.org/) as the sole ubiquitination site with high confidence. Consequently, to examine its role in ubiquitin-mediated degradation, Lys12 was altered to alanine and arginine by site-directed mutagenesis.

3.3. Role of Lys12 in AQP1 stability

The expression levels of wild type and altered AQP1 in LdBob cells was estimated by immunoblot analysis using anti-AQP1 antibody. Either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R could be detected at slightly higher levels (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively) than wild type in the flagellar membrane indicating that alteration of Lys12 to either alanine or arginine increased AQP1 expression (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Cellular localization of AQP1.

Fig. 2

Immunoblot analysis of flagellar and pellicular membrane fraction of LdBob transfectants probed with anti-AQP1 antibody. Details on each transfectant are described in Table S1. Twenty five microgram of flagellar and 50 μg of pellicular protein was loaded in each lane. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

When coexpressed with MPK2, wild type AQP1 is detected in both flagellar and pellicular membrane (13). However, coexpression of AQP1K12A (or AQP1K12R) with wild type MPK2 showed elevated AQP1 amounts in the flagellar but none in the pellicular membrane fraction (Fig. 2). As described previously (13), coexpression with altered MPK2K42A led to a significant reduction in AQP1 protein levels (Fig. 2). Interestingly, a near complete rescue of AQP1 expression was noted when altered AQP1 (AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R) was coexpressed with MPK2K42A (Fig. 2). This suggests that alteration of Lys12 of AQP1, a putative ubiquitylation target, prevents MPK2K42A mediated destabilization.

Immunofluorescence of Leishmania promastigotes also indicated that AQP1 was present in the flagellum only (Fig. 3A). AQP1 is phosphorylated by MPK2 and undergoes shuttling to both the flagellum and pellicular membrane of the parasite (Fig. 3B). Congruent with immunoblot analysis (Fig. 2), AQP1 is hardly detected in cells coexpressing MPK2K42A (Fig. 3C). Altered AQP1 (AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R) is similarly located as the wild type on the flagella of promastigotes (Fig. 3D and G). Interestingly, when coexpressed with MPK2WT, altered AQP1 was observed on the flagellum only but not the pellicular membrane of promastigotes (Fig. 3E and H). We interpret this observation as Lys12 being an essential element in the relocalization of AQP1 between different cellular compartments. In contrast to coexpression of wild type AQP1 and MPK2K42A where AQP1 is hardly detectable (Fig. 3C), coexpression of altered AQP1 with MPK2K42A showed the localization of AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R to flagellum alone (Fig. 3F and I). These observations again suggest that alteration of Lys12 prevents proteasome-mediated degradation.

Fig. 3. Immunofluorescence microscopy of LdBob transfectants.

Fig. 3

Cells were stained for AQP1 (green), DNA (blue), and α-tubulin (red). The three images were finally merged. Details of each transfectant are described in Table S1. Each experiment was repeated three times with similar results. Approximately fifty microscopic fields were examined with similar findings.

The stability of AQP1 was estimated from cycloheximide inhibition of protein synthesis. Cycloheximide inhibits protein synthesis in eukaryotes by blocking translational elongation. After cycloheximide treatment, AQP1WT protein levels gradually dropped with about half of the protein degrading within 48 hours (Fig. 4). Coexpression with MPK2WT increased the stability of AQP1WT considerably with nearly no degradation during the experimental period. Coexpression of MPK2K42A decreased the half-life of AQP1WT to < 4 h. In contrast, coexpression of either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R with MPK2K42A leads to stabilization of altered AQP1 (Fig. 4). These results indicate that alteration of Lys12 confers AQP1 stability.

3.4. Role of Lys12 in AQP1 activity

Loss of AQP1 confers resistance due to decreased Sb(III) accumulation in Leishmania promastigotes and conversely increased expression can reverse resistance (3, 4). Cells expressing wild type AQP1 were 130-fold more sensitive to Sb(III) than vector control (Table 1). Consistent with the slightly enhanced expression of altered AQP1 (Fig. 2), cells expressing AQP1K12A and AQP1K12R showed slightly higher Sb(III) accumulation, and 1.5- and 2-fold sensitivity to Sb(III), respectively, than wild type (Table 1). Coexpression of wild type AQP1 and MPK2 leads to an elevation of AQP1 protein levels (Fig. 2), a 10-fold increase in metalloid accumulation, and a 1,300-fold increase in Sb(III) sensitivity than vector control (Table 1). Coexpression of MPK2K42A resulted in depletion of AQP1 (Fig. 2). Cells showed near similar Sb(III) accumulation and metalloid sensitivity as the vector control (Table 1). In contrast, cells coexpressing altered AQP1 (AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R) and MPK2K42A had restored AQP1 levels (Fig. 2) and exhibited similar accumulation and sensitivity to metalloid as those expressing wild type AQP1 and MPK2 (Table 1). No changes were noted in AQP1 mRNA levels in any of the transfectants (Table S2). Thus an increase in AQP1 stability is directly proportional to enhanced Sb(III) accumulation and sensitivity.

Table 1.

Antimonite accumulation and sensitivity of LdBob cells expressing AQP1 and/or MPK2

Strain Sb(III) accumulation (nmol/109 cells) EC50 [Sb(III)] μM
Vector 2 ± 0.2 130 ± 5
AQP1WT 9 ± 0.6 1 ± 0.01
AQP1K12A 11 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.09
AQP1K12R 12 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 0.02
AQP1WT + MPK2WT 21 ± 0.4 0.1 ± 0.002
AQP1WT + MPK2K42A 3 ± 0.3 80 ± 3
AQP1K12A + MPK2WT 19 ± 0.7 0.1 ± 0.002
AQP1K12A + MPK2K42A 21 ± 0.7 0.1 ± 0.002
AQP1K12R + MPK2WT 19 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.002
AQP1K12R + MPK2K42A 19 ± 0.9 0.1 ± 0.002
MPK2WT 2 ± 0.2 105 ± 5
MPK2K42A 2 ± 0.2 105 ± 5

Data are presented as mean ± SE of three independent experiments in triplicate.

When LdBob cells are exposed to media with reduced osmolarity, they initially swell, but subsequently undergo compensatory shrinking referred to as regulatory volume decrease. This regulatory volume decrease ability of LdBob cells is directly proportional to its AQP1 protein level (7, 8, 13). LdBob cells were subjected to a 50% reduction in osmolarity (from 300 to 150 mOsm) and the changes in cell volume after the hypo-osmotic shock were monitored by following the absorbance at 550 nm. After a hypo-osmotic shock, cells expressing wild-type AQP1 showed a drop in absorbance indicating cell swelling, followed by a steady rise in absorbance to near original levels, signifying volume recovery. Cells expressing wild-type AQP1 exhibited a volume recovery of 56 seconds whereas the vector control needed 180 seconds (Fig. 5 and S4). Consistent with their slightly increased expression, cells expressing either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R exhibited a complete volume recovery in 43 seconds and 30 seconds, respectively (Fig. 5 and S4). When cells coexpressing wild-type AQP1 and MPK2 were subjected to a similar hypo-osmotic shock, the swelling and recovery process was essentially complete within the dead time of the spectrophotometer (Fig. 5 and S4). Cells coexpressing AQP1WT and MPK2K42A exhibited near negligible expression of AQP1 and took nearly 150 seconds for volume recovery (Fig. 5 and S4). In contrast, cells coexpressing AQP1K12A (or AQP1K12R) and either the wild type or altered MPK2 exhibited an identical volume recovery as cells transfected with wild type AQP1 and MPK2 (Fig. 5 and S4). Taken together, these results demonstrate that reduced AQP1 ubiquitination following alteration of Lys12 leads to increased protein stability and increased levels of AQP1 expression (Fig. 4), which provides improved osmoregulation in promastigotes (Fig. 5 and S4).

Fig. 5. Volume regulation in LdBob transfectants.

Fig. 5

LdBob promastigotes expressing the vector (●); AQP1WT (○); AQP1K12A (▼); AQP1WT + MPK2WT (△); AQP1WT + MPK2K42A (■); AQP1K12A + MPK2WT (◆); and AQP1K12A + MPK2K42A (□) were subjected to a hypo-osmotic shock, and the relative changes in cell volume were followed by monitoring the absorbance at 550 nm, as described in Materials and methods. Error bars were calculated from the mean ± SE of three independent experiments in triplicate.

4. Discussion

In this study we show that L. major AQP1 could be stabilized in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132, suggesting that AQP1 is degraded by the proteasome pathway. Alteration of Lys12 to either alanine or arginine led to slightly higher expression of AQP1. Cells expressing either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R exhibited increased metalloid sensitivity and accumulation than those expressing wild type AQP1. Taken together, our data demonstrate that Lys12 is targeted for ubiquitination and degradation of AQP1 and plays an integral role in regulating its activity. Unfortunately, despite repeated attempts, we were unable to show a direct ubiquitination event when immunoprecipitation experiments were performed with anti-ubiquitin antibody (Abcam). In addition to non-specific binding of anti-ubiquitin antibody with other ubiquitinated proteins in the flagellar membrane, both the polyclonal anti-ubiquitin and anti-AQP1 antibodies cross-reacted with each other, resulting in a high background.

We have earlier shown that AQP1 is a substrate of MPK2 (13). Thr197 in the cytosolic D-loop of AQP1 is phosphorylated by MPK2, and phosphorylation prolonged the half-life of AQP1. In contrast, alteration of Lys42 of MPK2 to alanine lowered the half-life of AQP1 considerably, indicating a direct correlation between phosphorylation and increased AQP1 stability. The dominant-negative effect on AQP1 expression can be reversed upon addition of MG132, implying a positive effect of MPK2 on the stability of AQP1 by inhibiting its ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. The protein disorder prediction server (22), PrDOS (http://prdos.hgc.jp/), predicts the 20 residue N-terminal region facing the cytosol to be highly dynamic. The disordered cytosolic N-terminus is often involved in accelerated degradation of proteins by ubiquitination (23, 24). It is possible that phosphorylation of AQP1 confers stability to its N-terminal disordered region and occludes Lys12 from ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation. Surprisingly, coexpression of MPK2K42A with either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R did not affect the stability of altered AQP1. This suggests that alteration at Lys12 propagates a conformational change at the N-terminus region that affects interaction of AQP1 with MPK2 and/or components of the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Further studies are required to elucidate the mechanism by which AQP1 activity is regulated by MPK2. Nevertheless, our analyses demonstrate that MPK2 is associated with the regulation of AQP1 stability and Lys12 of AQP1 is critical for MPK2-mediated regulation.

While AQP1 is localized to the flagella of promastigotes, upon phosphorylation, it is distributed over the entire surface of the parasite. Absence of phosphorylation of AQP1 restricted its localization to flagellum only (13). Interestingly, while MPK2 upregulated the expression of either AQP1K12A or AQP1K12R, the altered protein was localized to flagellum only. We interpret this observation as Lys12 being critical to pellicular localization of AQP1. The mechanisms for targeting proteins to flagella are now just being defined and are crucial to our understanding of flagellar function in kinetoplastids. In trypanosomes, a consensus tripeptide motif histidine-leucine-alanine (HLA) contained within two cytoskeletal flagellar proteins, paraflagellar rod A and actin-related protein, represents an essential part of a flagellar targeting machinery (25). However, such a feature is not universal. For example, the Leishmania enriettii glucose transporter, ISO1, resides primarily in the flagellar membrane, whereas the ISO2 glucose transporter is located in the pellicular plasma membrane. Deletion analyses suggest that the flagellar targeting information for ISO1 does not constitute a simple linear sequence of amino acids but a minimum of two separate sequences in tandem (26). While no such sequence has been identified in Leishmania AQP1, our current observation leads us to speculate that, the N-terminus cytosolic region along with residues in loop D (Fig. S1) may be involved in targeting AQP1 between various cellular membranes. Further studies including deletion analyses of AQP1 N-terminal region is currently in progress. In the absence of transcriptional control, such a post-translational regulatory mechanism provides a novel way for Leishmania to survive during its digenetic life cycle. It is tempting to speculate that MPK2-mediated upregulation of AQP1 may counter the osmotic stress, which is critical for survival and transmission of the parasite between two environments, the vector and the vertebrate host. On the other hand, the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain containing Lys12 may serve as an on-off switch for proteasomal-dependent degradation, especially during drug exposure, thereby conferring resistance.

In summary, our results indicate Lys12 to have a tripartite role in AQP1 activity: (i) a target for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation; (ii) regulating interaction with MPK2; and (iii) protein flux between the flagellum and pellicular membrane of the parasite. Since AQP1 is degraded through ubiquitin-proteasome pathways, drugs that block proteasome functions will upregulate AQP1 expression in Leishmania, which will lead to increased Sb(III) uptake and sensitivity. A combination drug regimen consisting of an antimony containing drug such as Pentostam® or Glucantime® along with a proteasome inhibitor such as bortezomib may therefore be an effective treatment against drug-resistant leishmaniasis.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a start-up grant from Florida International University - Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine and National Institutes of Health grants 5R37GM055425 and 5R25GM061347.

Abbreviations

Sb(III)

Antimonite

AQP1

Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin

MPK2

Leishmania major mitogen-activated protein kinase 2

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Zhou Y, Messier N, Ouellette M, Rosen BP, Mukhopadhyay R. Leishmania major LmACR2 is a pentavalent antimony reductase that confers sensitivity to the drug pentostam. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:37445–37451. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404383200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mukhopadhyay R, Bhattacharjee H, Rosen BP. Aquaglyceroporins: generalized metalloid channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840:1583–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gourbal B, Sonuc N, Bhattacharjee H, Legare D, Sundar S, Ouellette M, Rosen BP, Mukhopadhyay R. Drug uptake and modulation of drug resistance in Leishmania by an aquaglyceroporin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:31010–31017. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403959200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marquis N, Gourbal B, Rosen BP, Mukhopadhyay R, Ouellette M. Modulation in aquaglyceroporin AQP1 gene transcript levels in drug-resistant Leishmania. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;57:1690–1699. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04782.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Decuypere S, Rijal S, Yardley V, De Doncker S, Laurent T, Khanal B, Chappuis F, Dujardin JC. Gene expression analysis of the mechanism of natural Sb(V) resistance in Leishmania donovani isolates from Nepal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4616–4621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.11.4616-4621.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mandal S, Maharjan M, Singh S, Chatterjee M, Madhubala R. Assessing aquaglyceroporin gene status and expression profile in antimony-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates of Leishmania donovani from India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:496–507. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mandal G, Mandal S, Sharma M, Charret KS, Papadopoulou B, Bhattacharjee H, Mukhopadhyay R. Species-specific antimonial sensitivity in Leishmania is driven by post-transcriptional regulation of AQP1. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Figarella K, Uzcategui NL, Zhou Y, Lefurgey A, Ouellette M, Bhattacharjee H, Mukhopadhyay R. Biochemical characterization of Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin LmAQP1: possible role in volume regulation and osmotaxis. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65:1006–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Newby ZE, O'Connell J, 3rd, Robles-Colmenares Y, Khademi S, Miercke LJ, Stroud RM. Crystal structure of the aquaglyceroporin PfAQP from the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:619–625. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Uzcategui NL, Zhou Y, Figarella K, Ye J, Mukhopadhyay R, Bhattacharjee H. Alteration in glycerol and metalloid permeability by a single mutation in the extracellular C-loop of Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin LmAQP1. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70:1477–1486. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06494.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mukhopadhyay R, Mandal G, Atluri VS, Figarella K, Uzcategui NL, Zhou Y, Beitz E, Ajees AA, Bhattacharjee H. The role of alanine 163 in solute permeability of Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin LmAQP1. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2011;175:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gluenz E, Ginger ML, McKean PG. Flagellum assembly and function during the Leishmania life cycle. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13:473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mandal G, Sharma M, Kruse M, Sander-Juelch C, Munro LA, Wang Y, Vilg JV, Tamas MJ, Bhattacharjee H, Wiese M, Mukhopadhyay R. Modulation of Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin activity by a mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol Microbiol. 2012;85:1204–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08169.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goyard S, Segawa H, Gordon J, Showalter M, Duncan R, Turco SJ, Beverley SM. An in vitro system for developmental and genetic studies of Leishmania donovani phosphoglycans. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003;130:31–42. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Plourde M, Ubeda JM, Mandal G, Monte-Neto RL, Mukhopadhyay R, Ouellette M. Generation of an aquaglyceroporin AQP1 null mutant in Leishmania major. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2015.07.003. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee DH, Goldberg AL. Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:397–403. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01346-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schaffner W, Weissmann C. A rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the determination of protein in dilute solution. Anal Biochem. 1973;56:502–514. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90217-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li X, Huang T, Jiang G, Gong W, Qian H, Zou C. Proteasome inhibitor MG132 enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis and inhibits invasion of human osteosarcoma OS732 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;439:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ukekawa R, Maegawa N, Mizutani E, Fujii M, Ayusawa D. Proteasome inhibitors induce changes in chromatin structure characteristic of senescent human fibroblasts. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004;68:2395–2397. doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kamsteeg EJ, Hendriks G, Boone M, Konings IB, Oorschot V, van der Sluijs P, Klumperman J, Deen PM. Short-chain ubiquitination mediates the regulated endocytosis of the aquaporin-2 water channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18344–18349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604073103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moeller HB, Olesen ET, Fenton RA. Regulation of the water channel aquaporin-2 by posttranslational modification. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;300:F1062–1073. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00721.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ishida T, Kinoshita K. PrDOS: prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W460–464. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Landre V, Pion E, Narayan V, Xirodimas DP, Ball KL. DNA-binding regulates site-specific ubiquitination of IRF-1. Biochem J. 2013;449:707–717. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vittal V, Shi L, Wenzel DM, Scaglione KM, Duncan ED, Basrur V, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Baker D, Paulson HL, Brzovic PS, Klevit RE. Intrinsic disorder drives N-terminal ubiquitination by Ube2w. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:83–89. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ersfeld K, Gull K. Targeting of cytoskeletal proteins to the flagellum of Trypanosoma brucei. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:141–148. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.1.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nasser MI, Landfear SM. Sequences required for the flagellar targeting of an integral membrane protein. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004;135:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES