Skip to main content
Translational Andrology and Urology logoLink to Translational Andrology and Urology
. 2015 Aug;4(Suppl 1):AB168. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s168

AB168. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of packing materials for a catheter

Woong Jin Bae 1, Jin Bong Choi 1, Kang Sup Kim 1, Su Jin Kim 1, Hyuk Jin Cho 1, U Syn Ha 1, Sung Hoo Hong 1, Ji Youl Lee 1, Sae Woong Kim 1
PMCID: PMC4708795

Abstract

Objective

The necessity for biocompatible packing materials has become important as the increasing of using implantable medical devices. In this study, we investigated the biocompatibility of platinum-catalyzed silicone (Ecoflex®) as a packing material in the rats.

Methods

Twenty 12-week white male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. The rats were assigned to four experimental groups: control, non-coating metal, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and Ecoflex®. After a ball-shaped materials coated with PDMS and Ecoflex® were implanted into the bladder of rats, we compared the biocompatibility of non-coating metal, PDMS, and Ecoflex® by analyzing changes in the levels of macrophages and inflammatory cytokines in the bladder.

Results

Increased macrophage activity in the urothelium of the bladder was observed in PDMS and Ecoflex®. However, the increasing macrophage activity in PDMS and Ecoflex was not higher than non-coating metal (P<0.05). Increased inflammatory cytokine such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in PDMS and Ecoflex® were showed significantly difference compared with those of non-coating metal (P<0.05).

Conclusions

In our study, we suggested that PDMS and Ecoflex® might be used as safe packing materials for a catheter-intergrated bladder pressure sensor.

Keywords: Biocompatible material, bladder sensor


Articles from Translational Andrology and Urology are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES