Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1978 Apr;33(2):257–260. doi: 10.1136/thx.33.2.257

Comparison of reports on lung function tests made by chest physicians with those made by a simple computer program.

D M Geddes, M Green, P A Emerson
PMCID: PMC470880  PMID: 351849

Abstract

The numerical results of 60 sets of pulmonary function tests were submitted to five consultant chest physicians for independent reporting. The chest physicians' reports were compared with the reports generated by the on-line computer reporting system in routine use in the pulmonary function laboratory at Westminster Hospital. There was good agreement between the reports of the chest physicians among themselves and with the computer. The individual reports were compared with the consensus opinions of the physicians and the computer. The computer's decisions differed from the consensus opinion in 4.6% of instances. The comparable figures for the five physicians were respectively 2.9%, 2.9%, 2.9%, 4.0%, and 4.6%. Decisions differing from the consensus were due to mistakes or actual sustained disagreements of opinion. The physicians made more mistakes than the computer even though they were performing under test conditions. They made up for this, however, by producing fewer genuine disagreements from the consensus opinions. It is concluded that in routine day-to-day practice the computer report will be as consistently useful as the chest physicians' reports and more immediately available.

Full text

PDF
257

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chiang S. T. Application of desk-top computer in clinical spirometry. An automatic calculation and diagnosis program. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972 Oct;106(4):614–617. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.4.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellis J. H., Jr, Perera S. P., Levin D. C. A computer program for calculation and interpretation of pulmonary function studies. Chest. 1975 Aug;68(2):209–213. doi: 10.1378/chest.68.2.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoffer E. P., Kanarek D., Kazemi H., Barnett G. O. Computer interpretation of ventilatory studies. Comput Biomed Res. 1973 Aug;6(4):347–354. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(73)90070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pack A. I., McCusker R., Moran F. A computer system for processing data from routine pulmonary function tests. Thorax. 1977 Jun;32(3):333–341. doi: 10.1136/thx.32.3.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SHONFELD E. M., KEREKES J., RADEMACHER C. A., WEIHRER A. L., ABRAHAM S., SILVER H., CACERES C. A. METHODOLOGY FOR COMPUTER MEASUREMENT OF PULMONARY FUNCTION CURVES. Dis Chest. 1964 Oct;46:427–434. doi: 10.1378/chest.46.4.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES