INTRODUCTION
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a technique providing life support in severe but potentially reversible cardiorespiratory failure in patients with an expected mortality greater than 80%.1 ECLS has been used as prolonged cardiopulmonary support in neonates since 19762 with a proven survival benefit in neonates and adults.3,4
ECMO provides extracorporeal gas exchange and circulatory support by pumping blood from the patient through an artificial circuit comprising tubing, a pump, an oxygenator, and a heater. The oxygenator is used to oxygenate the blood and extract carbon dioxide. Blood is drawn from a venous access site, preferably a central catheter positioned in the right atrium, and returned either into the right atrium via a doublelumen catheter (venovenous ECMO) for respiratory support or via the carotid artery (venoarterial ECMO) for cardiopulmonary support.
Up to July, 2011, 46,509 patients worldwide have received ECMO support, including 29,839 neonates, 11,779 pediatric patients, and 4891 adult patients (Extra-corporeal Life Support Organization registry report, July, 2011). ECMO support is used in a variety of diagnoses in the pediatric population. Cardiac failure is the primary reason for ECMO in 45% of all cases. Diagnoses include cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), cardiomyopathy, cardiomyositis, postcardiothoracic surgery, and sepsis. Pulmonary failure caused by viral or bacterial pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome constitutes the major cause for pulmonary ECMO support. In 10% of all cases, ECMO was initiated during the course of CPR. There are increasing reports of ECMO in severe accidental hypothermia and prolonged refractory CPR.5–10
Although it may be lifesaving in critically ill patients, ECMO treatment is associated with several complications and mortality. Overall survival after ECMO support is 62%, and mortality is primarily associated with the underlying disease and complications of/during ECMO such as bleeding, renal failure, and infections.11–15 Prolonged ECMO support (>10 days) is associated with increased complications (such as nosocomial infections16–25) and poor outcome.15,26
Neurologic complications are frequent in ECMO patients, with intracranial hemorrhage, infarction, or seizures occurring in 7.4%, 5.7%, and 8.4% of all ECMO patients.27
Therapeutic hypothermia is an established therapy to prevent secondary neurologic damage in adults after cardiac arrest as well as in neonates after severe asphyxia.28–34 The use of therapeutic hypothermia in the pediatric setting remains controversial.35–37 However, several small studies have explored feasibility and safety of therapeutic hypothermia in the pediatric population.38–40 At least 1 study included ECMO patients.38 There are several publications of sustained therapeutic hypothermia in both neonates and infants during ECMO, showing that it is at least feasible.38,41–44 Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the pediatric setting are lacking, the resuscitation guidelines of the American Heart Association state that mild hypothermia may be considered in children who remain comatose after resuscitation.45 An RCT evaluating standard hypothermia in neonates on ECMO is being conducted in the United Kingdom to evaluate the effect of hypothermia on neurologic outcome.41 Hypothermia is used in pediatric postresuscitation patients awaiting RCTs, including ECMO patients.
Pharmacokinetic Changes in ECMO
The use of ECMO is associated with major pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) changes.46–49 Patients on ECMO generally receive more than 10 different drugs per day.50 These patients are heparinized to prevent clotting of the ECMO circuit, receive sedatives and analgesics to alleviate pain and discomfort, diuretics to manage fluid overload, and antibiotics or antiviral medication to treat infections.50
ECMO increases the circulating volume of the patient because of the added blood volume necessary to fill the circuit. Total circulating volume may be increased by 5% to more than 100% depending on patient and circuit size. The added volume influences blood composition, coagulation, circulation, and PK. Decreased protein levels, especially albumin, increase the unbound fraction of protein-bound drugs, thereby influencing volume of distribution (Vd) and total body clearance (Cl). Depending on the ECMO mode, organ perfusion and organ function are altered, which alters drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination.46
Profound changes in amount and composition of drug-metabolizing enzymes, organ function, and body composition take place in early infancy. Both total body water and extracellular water content change rapidly within the first months of life. Changes in body water and body fat are most dramatic in the first year of life but continue up to puberty. This situation results in age-specific and drug-specific PK changes.51,52 Both hepatic and renal Cl are subject to changes in the first month of life. Hepatic metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) are markedly different in the newborn period compared with the pediatric and adult population. Most CYP enzymes reach mature levels at 1 year of age, with higher than adult levels in children younger than 10 years. Renal Cl increases from the newborn period to mature values in the first year of life.52
Patients on ECMO are critically ill, which in itself changes PK and PD.53–55 CYP enzymes are downregulated during inflammation, resulting in reduced Cl of drugs cleared by the liver.56–58 ECMO increases the inflammatory response by activating inflammatory cytokines, which could further decrease CYP metabolism.59 Whether ECMO patients differ in this regard compared with patients who are critically ill but not on ECMO remains to be determined.
These changes should be taken into account when evaluating PK changes during ECMO treatment in the pediatric population.
A recent review46 has evaluated the changes in PK and PD during ECMO. With the use of nonlinear mixed modeling (NONMEM) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), sparse sampling strategies are used to access PK in infants on ECMO. Most available studies show altered PK with changes in Vd as well as Cl.60–74 Typically, Vd is increased between 5% and 400% for most drugs, whereas Cl is decreased between 0% and 50% compared with patients who are not on ECMO, resulting in prolonged elimination half-life.46
A major factor in the changed Vd is adsorption of drugs within the ECMO system components. Several studies have reported drug loss up to 99% for some drugs in in vitro setups. Lipophilic drugs in particular are sequestered to a high degree by the ECMO circuit,75–83 with a strong correlation between lipophilicity expressed as logP and adsorption rates.77 There is a large difference in adsorption rates between silicone-based membranes and microporous membranes.77,83 The use of newer circuits with microporous membranes may result in markedly different PK profiles in patients. New systems such as the iLA Activve ECMO circuit (Novalung, Hechingen, Germany) are being used in the pediatric population (Wildschut, personal communication, 2012). It is unclear how these newer systems and oxygenators affect drug disposition.
Incorporating continuous renal replacement therapy into the ECMO circuits influences drug disposition by increasing hemodilution and drug sequestration. Depending on water solubility, molecule size and protein-binding drugs can be cleared via hemofiltration or dialysis.84 The unbound fraction can be used as a crude estimation for the sieving coefficient and the subsequent expected effect of hemofiltration.84 Therefore, Cl may be increased for these drugs during dialysis, whereas for other drugs it may be decreased.
Although there are increasing data on PK changes, we are still limited by sparse data and small data sets, which make it difficult to effectively predict PK for our patients. Most PK data are from neonatal studies with large ECMO circuits consisting of PVC tubing and silicone-based membranes.
PK Changes in Hypothermia
Hypothermia is associated with significant changes in physiology as well as absorption, distribution, and elimination of drugs. As a consequence, changes in PK and PD may occur.47–49 A recent review by van den Broek and colleagues47 summarized the studies on changes in PK and PD during hypothermia in animals, adults, and children.
Hypothermia decreases cardiac output85 and changes organ perfusion by redistribution of blood flow from the extremities, kidneys, and liver to the brain and heart. Furthermore, intravascular volume is decreased by hemoconcentration, thereby influencing PK.86–88 Renal blood flow is also decreased during hypothermia in animal studies. Elimination of drugs by glomerular filtration subsequently decreases. It is unclear if tubular excretion and reabsorption are affected as well.47
Hypothermia changes the solubility of carbon dioxide in blood. When blood samples are not corrected for patient temperature (alpha-stat method) the patient Pco2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide) is lower by 0.82% compared with the measured value, with a subsequent higher pH than the obtained value. Potentially, there is a risk of higher pH values during hypothermia if clinicians use normal Pco2 and pH targets and blood gas analysis without temperature correction (pH-stat method).89 Ionization of drugs may be altered by changes in pH. The Vd of drugs with pKa between 7 and 8 may be altered. Weak bases show in an increased Vd and weak acids show decreased Vd when pH is not corrected. Lipid solubility is affected by temperature as well. Lower temperature decreases lipid solubility, thereby influencing Vd for lipophilic drugs. The effects on overall PK is probably small in mild hypothermia (32–34°C).47
Overall, ECMO seems to increase Vd, whereas the effects of hypothermia result in decreased Vd for most drugs.
Both ECMO and hypothermia seem to decrease renal and hepatic drug Cl. Combining ECMO and hypothermia may result in increased plasma levels and subsequent adverse effects. During rewarming, changes may reverse and may be even more profound in the ECMO population compared with the non-ECMO population.
PK Changes in Cardiopulmonary Bypass
There are no PK or PD data in ECMO patients during hypothermia, in the adult, pediatric, or neonatal population. However, by combining the available data, including PK data, during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), we have tried to predict the possible effects on the PK of several drugs in the pediatric ECMO population. A recent review summarized the available PK data in pediatric and adult patients during CPB. (van Saet, 2012, submitted for publication).
CPB is significantly different from ECMO not only in duration (hours vs days) and system size but also in the use of mild to deep hypothermia (normally 34°C down to 18°C) and circulatory arrest or selective brain perfusion. Cardiac output or flow rates during ECMO may be significantly different from those targeted during hypothermic CPB, thus changing organ perfusion and subsequent organ function. PK in CPB may therefore be markedly different compared with PK during ECMO and should be translated to the ECMO population with caution.
However, the comparison of PK between normothermic and hypothermic CPB may give vital clues in PK changes caused by hypothermia during ECMO. Table 1 gives an overview of the general effects of ECMO, CPB, and hypothermia on PK parameters. The next section discusses possible changes in PK or PD of different drugs in infants on ECMO. The changes for individual drugs are summarized in Table 2.
Table 1.
Overall effect on PK by different treatment modalities
ECMO | CPB | Hypothermia | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Absorption | Gastrointestinal tract | ? | ? | ↓ |
Vd | ↑ | ↑ | __/↓ | |
Extracellular water | ↑ | ↑ | ↑↓ | |
Drug adsorption | ↑ | ↑ | ? | |
Blood volume | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
Protein binding | ? | ? | ↓ | |
Ionization | ? | ? | ↑ | |
Cl | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
Organ perfusion | ? | ↓ | ↓ | |
Kidney | ? | ↓ | ↓ | |
Liver | ? | ↓ | ↓ | |
Enzymatic Cl | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
Receptor | ? | ? | ↓ |
Abbreviations: ↓, decreased; ↑, increased; ?, unknown.
Table 2.
Changes of PK for different drugs in different treatment modalities
Drugs | ECMO | Hypothermia | CPB |
---|---|---|---|
Cardiovascular Drugs | |||
Amiodarone | Increased dose90 | ||
Bumetanide | Vd ↑74 | ||
Esmolol | Increased dose91 | ||
Furosemide | No change92 | ||
Nesiritide | Increased dose93 | ||
Nicardipine | Vd–, Cl–94,95 | ||
Prostaglandin E1 | Increased dose96 | ||
Sildenafil | Vd ↑, Cl ↑97 | ||
Antimicrobial Drugs | |||
Caspofungin | No change98 | ||
Caspofungin | Low plasma levels99 | ||
Cefazolin | Vd ↑, Cl ↓100 | ||
Cefotaxime | Vd ↑, Cl–101 | ||
Cefuroxime | No change102 | ||
Gentamicin | Vd ↑, Cl ↓63–67 | Cl ↓103–105 | Vd ↑100 |
Oseltamivir | Vd–, CL–106 | ||
Ribavirin | Vd ↑107 | ||
Ticarcillin-clavulanic acid | No change108 | ||
Vancomycin | Vd ↑, Cl ↓69,70 | No change109 | |
Vancomycin | No change68 | ||
Voriconazole | Vd ↑, Cl ↓98,99,111 | ||
Neurological Drugs | |||
Midazolam | Vd ↑, Cl ↓60,112 | Cl ↓, Vd ↑113,114 | Vd ↑, Cl ↓115,116 |
Midazolam | Vd ↑, Cl ↑117,118 | ||
Fentanyl | High doses110 | Cl ↓, Vd ↓119,120 | Vd ↓, Cl ↓121–123 |
Morphine | No change62 | Cl ↓,124 Vd ↓126 | |
Morphine | Vd ↑, Cl ↓61,127,128 | ||
Phenobarbital | Vd ↑129 | Cl ↓130 | |
Phenytoin | Cl ↓, Vd–131,132 | ||
Pentobarbital | Vd ↓,133 Cl ↓134 | ||
Propofol | Cl ↓135 | V ↑, Cl–116,136 Cl ↑137 | |
Topiramate | Cl ↓138 | ||
Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs | |||
Cisatracurium | Cl–, Cl ↓139 | ||
Pancuronium | Vd ↓, Cl ↓140 | Vd ↑, Cl ↓141,142 | |
Vecuronium | Cl ↓143 | Cl ↓144 | |
Miscellaneous | |||
Ranitidine | Vd ↑, Cl ↓72 | ||
Theophylline | Vd ↑, Cl ↓73 | Vd↓103 |
Sedative and Analgesic Drugs
Data on sedation and analgesia in ECMO patients are available only from newborn studies. Higher needs of sedative drugs have been reported for these patients.110,112,127,145 Midazolam, fentanyl, and morphine are the drugs most commonly used and studied in the ECMO population.
Midazolam
Midazolam is a lipophilic drug (logP 3.9) with high protein binding (97%). Midazolam is metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 to a hydroxylated metabolite (1-OH-midazolam) with subsequent metabolism to 1-OH-midazolam-glucuronide by UGTs. Both metabolites are pharmacologically active when 1-OH-midazolam is nearly equipotent to the parent drug.
There are no PK studies of midazolam in older children on ECMO. PK studies in neonates and young infants on ECMO show a 3-fold to 4-fold increase in Vd after initiation of ECMO for midazolam. This increase can be attributed mainly to hemodilution and sequestration of midazolam by the ECMO circuit. Mulla and colleagues60 described a reduced Cl for midazolam, resulting in accumulation of midazolam 48 hours after initiation of ECMO in term neonates. In the study by Ahsman and colleagues,117 midazolam Cl in term neonates increased overtime, possibly reflecting maturation of the CYP drug-metabolizing enzymes and therefore hepatic Cl. In contrast, renal Cl of the glucoronidated active metabolite of hydroxymidazolam was decreased.117
In animal studies of postcardiac arrest, hypothermia midazolam Vd and Cl are decreased.146,147 In healthy adult volunteers, midazolam Cl but not Vd was affected by induced mild hypothermia.113 In an adult population with traumatic brain injury with mild hypothermia (32–34°C), midazolam concentrations increased 5-fold during hypothermia, with a subsequent decrease in plasma levels during rewarming. PK evaluation showed a 2-fold increase in Vd with a more than 100-fold decrease in Cl during the hypothermic phase.114 During the hypothermic phase of CPB, midazolam plasma levels increase in pediatric patients.115
Initiation of ECMO greatly increases Vd by hemodilution and drug adsorption to the circuit. Although the effects of hypothermia on Vd remain contradictory, it seems that these changes are small compared with the effect of adsorption to the ECMO system. An initial reduction of plasma concentrations should be expected. Reduced Cl during ECMO and hypothermia greatly increases risk of adverse effects, and efforts should be made to reduce midazolam infusions when possible based on clear treatment protocols. During slow rewarming, increased Cl lowers plasma levels, necessitating increased midazolam infusions when discomfort is noted.
Fentanyl
Fentanyl is a lipophilic drug (logP 4) with a high hepatic extraction ratio. Fentanyl is sequestered to a high degree by the ECMO circuit.77 Koren and colleagues81 reported drug sequestration of fentanyl in ECMO circuits, with a subsequent need for high fentanyl infusion rates. High fentanyl infusion rates have been reported by others as well, indicating altered PK or PD in these patients, but clear PK data in neonates and children on ECMO are lacking.110,148
Animal studies have shown increased fentanyl plasma levels in hypothermia models mostly caused by reduced hepatic blood flow and a reduction of CYP3A enzyme function.119,120 During deep hypothermia (18–25°C), Cl seems to be greatly reduced.119 Several studies show an initial decrease of fentanyl plasma concentrations during CPB caused by increased Vd by hemodilution and drug sequestration to the CPB circuit components. Plasma concentrations remain stable during hypothermic CPB, indicating reduced Cl.121–123
The high adsorption rate of fentanyl in ECMO circuits may necessitate high doses. Changes in ECMO circuits with reduced capacity to adsorb drugs probably reduce fentanyl needs. Reduced Cl during hypothermia with subsequent increased Cl during rewarming requires careful monitoring of patients. Rapid reduction of plasma levels may lead to agitation or opioid withdrawal symptoms.
Morphine
Morphine has a low protein binding and is metabolized by the liver to active metabolites morphine-6-glucuronide by the enzyme UGT2B7 and morphine-3-glucuronide by UGT2B7 and the enzyme-family UGT1A.
Morphine is widely used in neonatal intensive care as an analgesic and sedative during mechanical ventilation and ECMO. In 1994, Dagan and colleagues127 reported decreased morphine Cl in neonates on ECMO, with a concomitant 2-fold increase after decannulation. Geiduschek and colleagues62 found a similar change in Cl of morphine in 11 newborns on ECMO. Almost half of the patients showed increased Cl over time, possibly reflecting age-related maturation of drug-metabolizing enzyme activity. However, Geiduschek and colleagues found no significant decrease of morphine levels directly after cannulation. These investigators concluded therefore that PK of morphine was not significantly altered during ECMO.
In 2006, Peters and colleagues reported a 2-fold increase of Vd for morphine in neonates on ECMO compared with postoperative patients not treated with ECMO. Furthermore, Cl was decreased at the start of ECMO but increased over time, with normal Cl for age at day 14. The Cl of morphine-3-glucoronide and morphine-6-glucoronide is related to creatinine Cl.61,128
Bansinath and colleagues126 and Alcaraz and colleagues149 found decreased Vd and total body Cl in a dog model of moderate hypothermia (30°C). In a neonatal trial assessing whole-body therapeutic hypothermia in postasphyxiated neonates, significantly higher morphine plasma levels were found in the hypothermic treatment group.124 Apart from these changes in PK, there is evidence that morphine affinity for the μ opioid receptor is reduced by hypothermia.125,150
The increased Vd found in ECMO patients is partly caused by dilution. Morphine sequestration is substantially less compared with more lipophilic drugs such as fentanyl and midazolam, explaining in part the reduced effect on Vd. Altered Cl may reflect severity of disease more than specific ECMO-related changes. The use of hypothermia in ECMO patients probably leads to higher than expected plasma levels, with a subsequent decrease in plasma levels during the rewarming phase.
Propofol
Propofol is a highly protein-bound (95%–99%) and highly lipophilic drug (logP 3.8). It is mainly metabolized in the liver by glucuronidation at the C1-hydroxyl end. Hydroxylation of the benzene ring to 4-hydroxypropofol may also occur via CYP2B6 and 2C9. In children, propofol is not used for long-term sedation because of the possible occurrence of propofol infusion syndrome.151,152
There are no in vivo data on propofol during ECMO in either the pediatric or adult population. In vitro studies show high adsorption rates by ECMO systems.78,80 This situation most likely results in increased Vd when used in ECMO patients. Propofol concentrations were lower than expected in a pediatric CPB population.136 In adults, propofol concentrations decrease by 30% to 67% during CPB.116,153,154 There are indications that propofol PK or PD is affected by hypothermia. When using bispectral index to titrate propofol dosing on CPB, mild hypothermia reduces propofol requirements almost 2-fold in adults.154,155
In pediatric ECMO patients, higher doses of propofol bolus injections are probably caused by the increased Vd caused by hemodilution and drug adsorption to the ECMO circuit components. When used as a continuous infusion during hypothermia, increased plasma levels may occur.
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Neuromuscular blocking agents are used during hypothermia to prevent shivering. There are no PK data on neuromuscular blocking agents in children on ECMO. Several agents have been studied during CPB. Miller and colleagues156 found a decreased Vd by 40% with stable Cl for pancuronium during mild hypothermia in cats.140 Vecuronium Cl during hypothermia is unaltered in rats but seems to be decreased in human adults.143 Lower plasma levels with decreased Cl during mild and deep hypothermia are found in children on CPB. Overall, vecuronium requirements were greatly reduced during hypothermia as a result of altered PD.144 Cisatracurium PK does not seem to be greatly altered in infants on mild hypothermic CPB, although dose requirements decrease during hypothermia.139,157
Overall, there is evidence that PK, and especially PD, of neuromuscular blocking agents is altered during hypothermia. How PK is altered during ECMO is unknown and drugs should be titrated to effect.
Antimicrobial Drugs
Antibiotic use in ECMO patients is high, with a reported 71% use of antibiotic prophylaxis and 40% prolonged antibiotic use during ECMO. Infection rates in the pediatric ECMO population vary between 9% and 14%.16,158 Nosocomial or ongoing infections remain a significant problem and are associated with increased mortality.158
PK data on antibiotics on ECMO are limited; only vancomycin, gentamicin, and cefotaxime have been studied in detail.
Sequestration of antimicrobial drugs by the ECMO circuit is less pronounced compared with more lipophilic drugs.
Most antibiotics are excreted via the kidney. Addition of hemofiltration potentially increases Cl for drugs with a high unbound fraction.
Efficacy of antibiotics the effectiveness of which depends on peak concentrations (such as aminoglycosides) may be reduced by increased Vd. The risk of adverse events related to high trough levels may be increased because of reduced Cl. Antibiotics the effectiveness of which depends on time greater than minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (such as cefalosporins and vancomycin) may be affected by differences in drug Cl as well as Vd. Both undertreatment and toxicity need to be considered when dosing antibiotics on ECMO.
To guide antibiotic dosing regimens in ECMO patients, PK models that take into account ECMO-related PK changes need to be developed.
Gentamicin
Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with high water solubility (logP -3) and low protein binding (0%–30%). It is mainly eliminated unchanged via the kidneys.
Five studies examined gentamicin in infants on ECMO. All found an increased Vd, ranging from 0.51 L/kg67 to 0.748 L/kg63–66 compared with 0.45 L/kg in post-ECMO patients and critically non-ECMO patients.65,66 Cl on ECMO was decreased compared with the Cl in the post-ECMO period.65,66 It is unclear whether this decrease is because of ECMO itself or because of improvement in the clinical condition. When compared with term septic neonates, gentamicin Cl on ECMO seems to be unaffected or slightly decreased.63–67,159 All studies showed an increased elimination half-life of 10 hours compared with 5 to 6 hours in non-ECMO patients.160
Different dosing regimens were used in the studies. None reflect the current dose recommendations.
Induced hypothermia to 29°C was associated with decreased Vd and Cl in pigs.103 However, mild hypothermia of 35°C did not affect PK in juvenile pigs.104 Liu and colleagues105 confirmed these latter findings in 55 neonates cooled to 34°C after asphyxia.
During CPB and deep hypothermia (18–25°C), gentamicin Vd increased 2-fold, whereas Cl decreased. It is unclear if these effects reflect the influence of hypothermia or CPB. The increased Vd reflects the findings in infants on ECMO and can mostly be contributed to dilution. The possible decrease in peak concentrations with prolonged elimination necessitates the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for these patients, especially during hypothermia or renal replacement therapy, in which serum creatinine does not accurately reflect renal function. The kinetically guided maintenance dosing of gentamicin based on plasma concentration after the first dose should be optimized despite high interindividual PK parameter variability, especially in neonates treated for perinatal asphyxia with therapeutic hypothermia and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.161
Vancomycin
Vancomycin is a glycopeptide with a high water solubility (logP -3.1) and moderate protein binding (55%). This drug exerts a high renal Cl by glomerular filtration.
Vd is either increased or unaffected by ECMO. Cl was decreased, but primarily correlated to renal function.68–71 There are no trials assessing the effect of hypothermia on vancomycin Cl. A decrease in renal perfusion likely results in a decreased vancomycin Cl. Especially in patients who have had a cardiac arrest with a high risk of acute renal injury, this decrease could lead to toxic plasma levels. In children on CPB, vancomycin plasma levels decrease by 45% on initiation of CPB. Overall Vd and Cl do not seem to be greatly affected.109
Based on the available literature, vancomycin dosing intervals should be based on age and renal function. Drug monitoring should be used to adjust dosing.
Cephalosporins
Cefotaxime, cefuroxime, cefazolin
Cephalosporins are widely used in pediatric patients, including those on ECMO. PK of cefotaxime during ECMO and of cefuroxime during CPB is altered but plasma levels are more than the MIC using normal dosing regimens.101,102 Cefotaxime Cl was found to be increased during ECMO compared with the pre-ECMO and post-ECMO period, possibly reflecting improved hepatic or renal perfusion during ECMO or Cl via hemofiltration.101 A possible decrease in Cl caused by hypothermia increases plasma levels, negating the effects of ECMO. Cefazolin plasma levels remained greater than MIC in infants during CPB after bolus infusions before the start of bypass.100 Because of the large therapeutic window of cefotaxime, the chance of reaching toxic effects is small. For cefotaxime and cefazolin, dose adjustments do not seem to be necessary during ECMO and hypothermia.
Oseltamivir
In the recent H1N1 influenza pandemic, ECMO support was successfully initiated in children and adults, with survival rates of 70%.162–164 Oseltamivir is the drug of choice in H1N1 influenza, whereas alternatives such as inhaled zanamivir or intravenous zanamivir have not been evaluated in critically ill children. A case report describing 3 patients with H1N1 influenza supported with ECMO showed that adequate oseltamivir plasma levels were achieved in 2 of 3 patients. More specifically, a 2-fold dose increase of 4 mg/kg/d (vs 2 mg/kg/d) resulted in a 2-fold increase in plasma levels. The influence of the ECMO circuit seems to be limited in this small case series. One patient with profuse gastric retentions and hematemesis failed to achieve adequate plasma concentrations of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate, probably reflecting insufficient intestinal absorption of the parent drug.106
Oseltamivir is metabolized in the liver by esterases. Bioavailability is about 75% after oral administration. There are indications that oral absorption of some drugs may be reduced during hypothermia in animal studies.165 The active metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate is eliminated by the kidney. Hypothermia could influence bioavailability and elimination of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate. There is no evidence to alter the standard dosing regimen in hypothermic ECMO patients.
Miscellaneous
Heparin
Coagulation is affected by hypothermia. Enzymatic reactions in the coagulation cascade are decreased, resulting in prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time.166,167 Platelet activation and aggregation are influenced by hypothermia. Some experimental studies show decreased platelet function and aggregation,168–170 whereas others show increased platelet aggregation during mild and moderate hypothermia in adults.171,172 Ramaker and colleagues173 found increased clotting times with normal or enhanced thrombus strength using thromboelastography.
ECMO activates the coagulation cascade, resulting in consumption and activation of clotting factors. This situation leads to clotting factor deficiencies, impaired platelet function, thrombocytopenia, and fibrinolysis.174
All ECMO patients receive heparin to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. Heparin infusions are titrated to either activated clotting time, aPTT, or antifactor Xa. Heparin Cl is increased during ECMO byadsorption of heparin by the ECMO circuit. Higher heparin doses on ECMO are necessary to maintain anticoagulation.175,176
Anticoagulation targets may be different during therapeutic hypothermia on ECMO. Careful monitoring using multiple tests helps to titrate heparin infusions in these patients.
Phenobarbital
Phenobarbital is a long-acting barbiturate mainly eliminated via the liver by CYP 2C19. It is partly bound to protein (20%–45%) with a logP of 1.47. Phenobarbital PK data during ECMO are limited to a single case report. A slightly Vd (1.2 L/kg) with a normal serum elimination half-life (92 hours) resulted in low but still therapeutic serum concentrations. Dose recommendations cannot be made based on this single case report, but clinicians should be aware that higher loading doses may be required.129 In hypothermic children, Cl and Vd of pentobarbital and phenobarbital seem to be reduced.130,133
Filippi and colleagues177 described increased plasma levels of phenobarbital with decreased Cl in neonates treated for perinatal asphyxia with therapeutic hypothermia. Barbiturates are primarily metabolized in the liver by the hepatic microsomal enzyme system. The metabolites are excreted in the urine and, less commonly, in the feces. Reduction of enzymatic processes and redistribution of blood flow influence PK, possibly negating the decreased plasma levels reported during ECMO. TDM is advised in these patients to monitor plasma levels during cooling and rewarming to prevent toxicity and withdrawal.
SUMMARY
Almost 10% of all pediatric ECMO runs occur during or shortly after CPR. With the increased use of therapeutic hypothermia, most of these patients are cooled during their ECMO run. Evidence-based dose regimens are still lacking for many regularly used drugs in children on ECMO, either with or without hypothermia. Our understanding of PK changes is insufficient to prepare a predictive model. The combination of routine sparse sampling, drug assay via LC-MS, and a PK analysis using NONMEM in combination with validated PD end points such as the COMFORT behavioral scale178 or face, legs, arms, cry, consolability (FLACC)179 and a numeric rating scale to assess discomfort and pain allow the study of drug behavior in these vulnerable patients without harm to the individual.
Overall, Vd changes occur rapidly at start of ECMO as a result of hemodilution and adsorption of drugs by the ECMO system. Initial changes in Vd may necessitate higher doses to achieve adequate plasma concentrations. If Vd is increased and stays unchanged, steady state levels are affected only by the dose rate and Cl rate.
Changes in PK are drug and circuit dependent, with more dramatic changes found with lipophilic drugs and silicone oxygenators. Differences in ECMO circuits used, patient populations, and diseases may influence PK and PD further. Changes in Vd as a result of hypothermia are difficult to predict during ECMO, but seem to be small compared with the changes caused by adsorption of drugs to the ECMO circuit. Cl may be more dramatically changed by combining ECMO with therapeutic hypothermia. Both organ perfusion and enzymatic reactions are reduced by hypothermia. Most data on PK of drugs during hypothermia show decreased Cl with higher plasma levels. Particularly during rewarming, clinicians need to be vigilant and expect rapid decreases in plasma levels of most sedatives.
The greatest changes are:
Increased Vd, especially for lipophilic drugs on initiation of ECMO
Decreased Cl as a result of ECMO and hypothermia, especially of drugs dependent on enzymatic reactions
Reduced renal Cl as a result of reduced renal perfusion during ECMO and hypothermia for drugs cleared by glomerular filtration
KEY POINTS.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) increases volume of distribution and reduces clearance of most drugs.
Lipophilic drugs in particular are sequestered by the ECMO circuits.
Sequestration of drugs is to a large extent circuit dependent.
Hypothermia influences volume of distribution and decreases clearance.
Hypothermia superimposed on ECMO most likely decreases clearance further, especially for drugs with a high hepatic clearance.
Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for drugs with a small therapeutic window.
Acknowledgments
John N van den Anker is in part supported by NIH grants (R01HD060543, K24DA027992, R01HD048689 and U54HD071601) and European Union FP7 grants TINN (223614), TINN2 (260908), NEUROSIS (223060), and GRIP (261060).
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors have no financial disclosures concerning the contents of this paper.
Conflict of interests: The authors declare that they have no competing or conflicting interests.
References
- 1.Organization EELS. General Guidelines for all ECLS Cases. Version 1:1. 2009 Apr; Available at: http://www.elso.med.umich.edu/WordForms/ELSO%20Guidelines%20General%20All%20ECLS%20Version1.1.pdf. Accessed January 1, 2010.
- 2.Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Jefferies MR, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cardiopulmonary support in infancy. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1976;22:80–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group. Lancet. 1996;348(9020):75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coskun KO, Popov AF, Schmitto JD, et al. Extracorporeal circulation for rewarming in drowning and near-drowning pediatric patients. Artif Organs. 2010;34(11):1026–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruttmann E, Weissenbacher A, Ulmer H, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted support provides improved survival in hypothermic patients with cardiocirculatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(3):594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guenther U, Varelmann D, Putensen C, et al. Extended therapeutic hypothermia for several days during extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation after drowning and cardiac arrest Two cases of survival with no neurological sequelae. Resuscitation. 2009;80(3):379–81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kane DA, Thiagarajan RR, Wypij D, et al. Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children with cardiac disease. Circulation. 2010;122(Suppl 11):S241–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fiser RT, Morris MC. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory pediatric cardiac arrest. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55(4):929–41, x. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Prodhan P, Fiser RT, Dyamenahalli U, et al. Outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following refractory pediatric cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit. Resuscitation. 2009;80(10):1124–9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Swaniker F, Kolla S, Moler F, et al. Extracorporeal life support outcome for 128 pediatric patients with respiratory failure. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(2):197–202. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)90009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pathan N, Ridout DA, Smith E, et al. Predictors of outcome for children requiring respiratory extra-corporeal life support: implications for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2256–63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1232-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shah SA, Shankar V, Churchwell KB, et al. Clinical outcomes of 84 children with congenital heart disease managed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery. ASAIO J. 2005;51(5):504–7. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000171595.67127.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zwischenberger JB, Nguyen TT, Upp JR, Jr, et al. Complications of neonatal extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Collective experience from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107(3):838–48. [discussion: 48–9] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karimova A, Brown K, Ridout D, et al. Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: practice patterns and predictors of outcome in the UK. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(2):F129–32. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.141051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brown KL, Ridout DA, Shaw M, et al. Healthcare-associated infection in pediatric patients on extracorporeal life support: the role of multidisciplinary surveillance. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(6):546–50. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000243748.74264.CE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coffin SE, Bell LM, Manning M, et al. Nosocomial infections in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18(2):93–6. doi: 10.1086/647561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Costello JM, Morrow DF, Graham DA, et al. Systematic intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):915–23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Douglass BH, Keenan AL, Purohit DM. Bacterial and fungal infection in neonates undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an analysis of the registry data of the extracorporeal life support organization. Artif Organs. 1996;20(3):202–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1996.tb04428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elerian LF, Sparks JW, Meyer TA, et al. Usefulness of surveillance cultures in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2001;47(3):220–3. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200105000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O’Neill JM, Schutze GE, Heulitt MJ, et al. Nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(8):1247–53. doi: 10.1007/s001340101029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schutze GE, Heulitt MJ. Infections during extracorporeal life support. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(6):809–12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90753-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Steiner CK, Stewart DL, Bond SJ, et al. Predictors of acquiring a nosocomial bloodstream infection on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(3):487–92. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.21609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alsoufi B, Al-Radi OO, Gruenwald C, et al. Extra-corporeal life support following cardiac surgery in children: analysis of risk factors and survival in a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(6):1004–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.015. [discussion: 11] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alsoufi B, Al-Radi OO, Nazer RI, et al. Survival outcomes after rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric patients with refractory cardiac arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(4):952–959.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.05.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumar TK, Zurakowski D, Dalton H, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in postcardiotomy patients: factors influencing outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(2):330–336.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hervey-Jumper SL, Annich GM, Yancon AR, et al. Neurological complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;7(4):338–44. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.PEDS10443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):549–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):557–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nolan JP, Morley PT, Hoek TL, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. An advisory statement by the Advancement Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003;57(3):231–5. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00184-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9460):663–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17946-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, et al. Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: efficacy outcomes. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;32(1):11–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shankaran S, Pappas A, Laptook AR, et al. Outcomes of safety and effectiveness in a multicenter randomized, controlled trial of whole-body hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):e791–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Azzopardi D, Brocklehurst P, Edwards D, et al. The TOBY Study Whole body hypothermia for the treatment of perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2008;(8):17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sanchez de Toledo J, Bell MJ. Complications of hypothermia: interpreting ‘serious,’ ‘adverse,’ and ‘events’ in clinical trials. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(3):439–41. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181c510e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baltagi S, Fink EL, Bell MJ. Therapeutic hypothermia: ready…fire…aim? How small feasibility studies can inform large efficacy trials. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):370–1. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e8b7ef. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Statler KD, Bratton SL. Therapeutic hypothermia and pediatric cardiac arrests: vexing questions. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(1):151–3. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181c0115a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fink EL, Clark RS, Kochanek PM, et al. A tertiary care center’s experience with therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(1):66–74. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181c58237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Topjian A, Hutchins L, DiLiberto MA, et al. Induction and maintenance of therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest: efficacy of a surface cooling protocol. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):e127–35. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e28717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bourdages M, Bigras JL, Farrell CA, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias associated with severe traumatic brain injury and hypothermia therapy. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(3):408–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Field DJ, Firmin R, Azzopardi DV, et al. Neonatal ECMO Study of Temperature (NEST)–a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Horan M, Ichiba S, Firmin RK, et al. A pilot investigation of mild hypothermia in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) J Pediatr. 2004;144(3):301–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ichiba S, Killer HM, Firmin RK, et al. Pilot investigation of hypothermia in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(2):F128–33. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.2.F128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Massaro A, Rais-Bahrami K, Chang T, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 2010;157(3):499–501.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric advanced life support. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):e1005–28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wildschut ED, Ahsman MJ, Houmes RJ, et al. Pharmacotherapy in neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Curr Drug Metab. 2012;13(6):767–77. doi: 10.2174/138920012800840383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.van den Broek MP, Groenendaal F, Egberts AC, et al. Effects of hypothermia on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(5):277–94. doi: 10.2165/11319360-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zanelli S, Buck M, Fairchild K. Physiologic and pharmacologic considerations for hypothermia therapy in neonates. J Perinatol. 2011;31(6):377–86. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Arpino PA, Greer DM. Practical pharmacologic aspects of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(1):102–11. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.1.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Buck ML. Pharmacokinetic changes during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: implications for drug therapy of neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(5):403–17. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342050-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.de Wildt SN. Profound changes in drug metabolism enzymes and possible effects on drug therapy in neonates and children. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7(8):935–48. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2011.577739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, et al. Developmental pharmacology–drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(12):1157–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vet NJ, de Hoog M, Tibboel D, et al. The effect of critical illness and inflammation on midazolam therapy in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(1):e48–50. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181fe406d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peeters MY, Bras LJ, DeJongh J, et al. Disease severity is a major determinant for the pharmacodynamics of propofol in critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(3):443–51. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lopez SA, Mulla H, Durward A, et al. Extended-interval gentamicin: population pharmacokinetics in pediatric critical illness. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(2):267–74. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b80693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Morgan ET. Regulation of cytochromes P450 during inflammation and infection. Drug Metab Rev. 1997;29(4):1129–88. doi: 10.3109/03602539709002246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Carcillo JA, Doughty L, Kofos D, et al. Cytochrome P450 mediated-drug metabolism is reduced in children with sepsis-induced multiple organ failure. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(6):980–4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1758-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vet NJ, de Hoog M, Tibboel D, et al. The effect of inflammation on drug metabolism: a focus on pediatrics. Drug Discov Today. 2011;16(9–10):435–42. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Peek GJ, Firmin RK. The inflammatory and coagulative response to prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 1999;45(4):250–63. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199907000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mulla H, McCormack P, Lawson G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam in neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(2):275–82. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Peters JW, Anderson BJ, Simons SH, et al. Morphine pharmacokinetics during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(2):257–63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2545-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Geiduschek JM, Lynn AM, Bratton SL, et al. Morphine pharmacokinetics during continuous infusion of morphine sulfate for infants receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(2):360–4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199702000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bhatt-Mehta V, Johnson CE, Schumacher RE. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in term neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pharmacotherapy. 1992;12(1):28–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cohen P, Collart L, Prober CG, et al. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates undergoing extracorporal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9(8):562–6. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199008000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dodge WF, Jelliffe RW, Zwischenberger JB, et al. Population pharmacokinetic models: effect of explicit versus assumed constant serum concentration assay error patterns upon parameter values of gentamicin in infants on and off extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Ther Drug Monit. 1994;16(6):552–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Munzenberger PJ, Massoud N. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonatal patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO Trans. 1991;37(1):16–8. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199101000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Southgate WM, DiPiro JT, Robertson AF. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33(6):817–9. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.6.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Buck ML. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18(5):1082–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mulla H, Pooboni S. Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60(3):265–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Amaker RD, DiPiro JT, Bhatia J. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in critically ill infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40(5):1139–42. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hoie EB, Swigart SA, Leuschen MP, et al. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Pharm. 1990;9(9):711–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wells TG, Heulitt MJ, Taylor BJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ranitidine in neonates treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;38(5):402–7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mulla H, Nabi F, Nichani S, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of theophylline during paediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55(1):23–31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01735.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wells TG, Fasules JW, Taylor BJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bumetanide in neonates treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 1992;121(6):974–80. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80355-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hynynen M. Binding of fentanyl and alfentanil to the extracorporeal circuit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987;31(8):706–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mehta NM, Halwick DR, Dodson BL, et al. Potential drug sequestration during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: results from an ex vivo experiment. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(6):1018–24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0606-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wildschut ED, Ahsman MJ, Allegaert K, et al. Determinants of drug absorption in different ECMO circuits. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(12):2109–16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2041-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mulla H, Lawson G, von Anrep C, et al. In vitro evaluation of sedative drug losses during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. 2000;15(1):21–6. doi: 10.1177/026765910001500104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dagan O, Klein J, Gruenwald C, et al. Preliminary studies of the effects of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator on the disposition of common pediatric drugs. Ther Drug Monit. 1993;15(4):263–6. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199308000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hynynen M, Hammaren E, Rosenberg PH. Propofol sequestration within the extracorporeal circuit. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(7):583–8. doi: 10.1007/BF03009997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Koren G, Crean P, Klein J, et al. Sequestration of fentanyl by the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPBP) Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;27(1):51–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00553154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rosen D, Rosen K, Davidson B, et al. Fentanyl uptake by the Scimed membrane oxygenator. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1988;2(5):619–26. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(88)90054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rosen DA, Rosen KR, Silvasi DL. In vitro variability in fentanyl absorption by different membrane oxygenators. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990;4(3):332–5. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90041-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bouman CS. Antimicrobial dosing strategies in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and high-dose continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(6):654–9. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e32830f937c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Gebauer CM, Knuepfer M, Robel-Tillig E, et al. Hemodynamics among neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy during whole-body hypothermia and passive rewarming. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):843–50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Delin NA, Kjartansson KB, Pollock L, et al. Redistribution of regional blood flow in hypothermia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1965;49:511–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Metz C, Holzschuh M, Bein T, et al. Moderate hypothermia in patients with severe head injury: cerebral and extracerebral effects. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(4):533–41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lazenby WD, Ko W, Zelano JA, et al. Effects of temperature and flow rate on regional blood flow and metabolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53(6):957–64. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90367-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tarr TJ, Snowdon SL. Blood/gas solubility coefficient and blood concentration of enflurane during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1991;5(2):111–5. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(91)90320-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kendrick JG, Macready JJ, Kissoon N. Amiodarone treatment of junctional ectopic tachycardia in a neonate receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(10):1872–5. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Robinson B, Eshaghpour E, Ewing S, et al. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in an infant of a diabetic mother: support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and treatment with beta-adrenergic blockade and increased intravenous fluid administration. ASAIO J. 1998;44(6):845–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.van der Vorst MM, den Hartigh J, Wildschut E, et al. An exploratory study with an adaptive continuous intravenous furosemide regimen in neonates treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R111. doi: 10.1186/cc6146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Smith T, Rosen DA, Russo P, et al. Nesiritide during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(2):152–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sell LL, Cullen ML, Lerner GR, et al. Hypertensionduringextracorporealmembrane oxygenation: cause, effect, and management. Surgery. 1987;102(4):724–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.McBride BF, White CM, Campbell M, et al. Nicardipine to control neonatal hypertension during extracorporeal membrane oxygen support. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37(5):667–70. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Stone DM, Frattarelli DA, Karthikeyan S, et al. Altered prostaglandin E1 dosage during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a newborn with ductal-dependent congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27(3):360–3. doi: 10.1007/s00246-005-1189-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ahsman MJ. Determinants of pharmacokinetic variability during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a roadmap to rational pharmacotherapy in children. Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Erasmus MC; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Spriet I, Annaert P, Meersseman P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin and voriconazole in critically ill patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63(4):767–70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ruiz S, Papy E, Da Silva D, et al. Potential voriconazole and caspofungin sequestration during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(1):183–4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1269-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Haessler D, Reverdy ME, Neidecker J, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and gentamicin in cardiac surgery for children less than ten kilograms. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(2):221–5. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ahsman MJ, Wildschut ED, Tibboel D, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in infants during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(5):1734–41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01696-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Knoderer CA, Saft SA, Walker SG, et al. Cefuroxime pharmacokinetics in pediatric cardiovascular surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(3):425–30. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Koren G, Barker C, Bohn D, et al. Influence of hypothermia on the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and theophylline in piglets. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):844–7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Satas S, Hoem NO, Melby K, et al. Influence of mild hypothermia after hypoxia-ischemia on the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in newborn pigs. Biol Neonate. 2000;77(1):50–7. doi: 10.1159/000014195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Liu X, Borooah M, Stone J, et al. Serum gentamicin concentrations in encephalopathic infants are not affected by therapeutic hypothermia. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):310–5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wildschut ED, de Hoog M, Ahsman MJ, et al. Plasma concentrations of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate in critically ill children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e10938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Aebi C, Headrick CL, McCracken GH, et al. Intravenous ribavirin therapy in a neonate with disseminated adenovirus infection undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: pharmacokinetics and clearance by hemofiltration. J Pediatr. 1997;130(4):612–5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70246-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lindsay CA, Bawdon R, Quigley R. Clearance of ticarcillin-clavulanic acid by continuous venovenous hemofiltration in three critically ill children, two with and one without concomitant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pharmacotherapy. 1996;16(3):458–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Hatzopoulos FK, Stile-Calligaro IL, Rodvold KA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous vancomycin in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12(4):300–4. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199304000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Leuschen MP, Willett LD, Hoie EB, et al. Plasma fentanyl levels in infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105(5):885–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Bruggemann RJ, Antonius T, Heijst A, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole in a child with invasive aspergillosis requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30(6):643–6. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181898b0c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Mulla H, Lawson G, Peek GJ, et al. Plasma concentrations of midazolam in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2003;49(1):41–7. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200301000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hostler D, Zhou J, Tortorici MA, et al. Mild hypothermia alters midazolam pharmacokinetics in normal healthy volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(5):781–8. doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.031377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Fukuoka N, Aibiki M, Tsukamoto T, et al. Biphasic concentration change during continuous midazolam administration in brain-injured patients undergoing therapeutic moderate hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2004;60(2):225–30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kern FH, Ungerleider RM, Jacobs JR, et al. Computerized continuous infusion of intravenous anesthetic drugs during pediatric cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1991;72(4):487–92. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Dawson PJ, Bjorksten AR, Blake DW, et al. The effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on total and unbound plasma concentrations of propofol and midazolam. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11(5):556–61. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Ahsman MJ, Hanekamp M, Wildschut ED, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of midazolam and its metabolites during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(6):407–19. doi: 10.2165/11319970-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wildschut ED, Hanekamp MN, Vet NJ, et al. Feasibility of sedation and analgesia interruption following cannulation in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(9):1587–91. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1931-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Koren G, Barker C, Goresky G, et al. The influence of hypothermia on the disposition of fentanyl–human and animal studies. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;32(4):373–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00543972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Fritz HG, Holzmayr M, Walter B, et al. The effect of mild hypothermia on plasma fentanyl concentration and biotransformation in juvenile pigs. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(4):996–1002. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000146517.17910.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Newland MC, Leuschen P, Sarafian LB, et al. Fentanyl intermittent bolus technique for anesthesia in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989;3(4):407–10. doi: 10.1016/s0888-6296(89)97315-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Koska AJ, 3rd, Romagnoli A, Kramer WG. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on fentanyl distribution and elimination. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;29(1):100–5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kussman BD, Zurakowski D, Sullivan L, et al. Evaluation of plasma fentanyl concentrations in infants during cardiopulmonary bypass with low-volume circuits. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19(3):316–21. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Roka A, Melinda KT, Vasarhelyi B, et al. Elevated morphine concentrations in neonates treated with morphine and prolonged hypothermia for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):e844–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Puig MM, Warner W, Tang CK, et al. Effects of temperature on the interaction of morphine with opioid receptors. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59(11):1459–64. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.11.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Bansinath M, Turndorf H, Puig MM. Influence of hypo and hyperthermia on disposition of morphine. J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;28(9):860–4. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1988.tb03229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Dagan O, Klein J, Bohn D, et al. Effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on morphine pharmacokinetics in infants. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(7):1099–101. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199407000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Peters JW, Anderson BJ, Simons SH, et al. Morphine metabolite pharmacokinetics during venoarterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(7):705–14. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645070-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Elliott ES, Buck ML. Phenobarbital dosing and pharmacokinetics in a neonate receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33(4):419–22. doi: 10.1345/aph.18248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kadar D, Tang BK, Conn AW. The fate of phenobarbitone in children in hypothermia and at normal body temperature. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1982;29(1):16–23. doi: 10.1007/BF03007942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Iida Y, Nishi S, Asada A. Effect of mild therapeutic hypothermia on phenytoin pharmacokinetics. Ther Drug Monit. 2001;23(3):192–7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200106000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Bhagat H, Bithal PK, Chouhan RS, et al. Is phenytoin administration safe in a hypothermic child? J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13(9):953–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Schaible DH, Cupit GC, Swedlow DB, et al. High-dose pentobarbital pharmacokinetics in hypothermic brain-injured children. J Pediatr. 1982;100(4):655–60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80780-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kalser SC, Kelly MP, Forbes EB, et al. Drug metabolism in hypothermia. Uptake, metabolism and biliary excretion of pentobarbital-2-C14 by the isolated, perfused rat liver in hypothermia and euthermia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969;170(1):145–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Leslie K, Sessler DI, Bjorksten AR, et al. Mild hypothermia alters propofol pharmacokinetics and increases the duration of action of atracurium. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(5):1007–14. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199505000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Absalom A, Amutike D, Lal A, et al. Accuracy of the ‘Paedfusor’ in children undergoing cardiac surgery or catheterization. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(4):507–13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bailey JM, Mora CT, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult patients undergoing coronary revascularization. The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(6):1288–97. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199606000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Filippi L, la Marca G, Fiorini P, et al. Topiramate concentrations in neonates treated with prolonged whole body hypothermia for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Epilepsia. 2009;50(11):2355–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Withington D, Menard G, Varin F. Cisatracurium pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infants and children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(3):341–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Miller RD, Agoston S, van der Pol F, et al. Hypothermia and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pancuronium in the cat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978;207(2):532–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.d’Hollander AA, Duvaldestin P, Henzel D, et al. Variations in pancuronium requirement, plasma concentration, and urinary excretion induced by cardiopulmonary bypass with hypothermia. Anesthesiology. 1983;58(6):505–9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198306000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Wierda JM, van der Starre PJ, Scaf AH, et al. Pharmacokinetics of pancuronium in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery with and without low dose dopamine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990;19(6):491–8. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199019060-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Caldwell JE, Heier T, Wright PM, et al. Temperature-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vecuronium. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(1):84–93. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200001000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Withington D, Menard G, Harris J, et al. Vecuronium pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infants and children. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47(12):1188–95. doi: 10.1007/BF03019867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Arnold JH, Truog RD, Scavone JM, et al. Changes in the pharmacodynamic response to fentanyl in neonates during continuous infusion. J Pediatr. 1991;119(4):639–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82419-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Empey PE, Miller TM, Philbrick AH, et al. Mild hypothermia decreases fentanyl and midazolam steady-state clearance in a rat model of cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(4):1221–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823779f9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Zhou J, Empey PE, Bies RR, et al. Cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermia decrease isoform-specific cytochrome P450 drug metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39(12):2209–18. doi: 10.1124/dmd.111.040642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Arnold JH, Truog RD, Orav EJ, et al. Tolerance and dependence in neonates sedated with fentanyl during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(6):1136–40. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199012000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Alcaraz C, Bansinath M, Turndorf H, et al. Cardiovascular effects of morphine during hypothermia. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1989;297:133–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Simantov R, Snowman AM, Snyder SH. Temperature and ionic influences on opiate receptor binding. Mol Pharmacol. 1976;12(6):977–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Cremer OL. The propofol infusion syndrome: more puzzling evidence on a complex and poorly characterized disorder. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):1012. doi: 10.1186/cc8177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Okamoto MP, Kawaguchi DL, Amin AN. Evaluation of propofol infusion syndrome in pediatric intensive care. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(19):2007–14. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.19.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Hiraoka H, Yamamoto K, Okano N, et al. Changes in drug plasma concentrations of an extensively bound and highly extracted drug, propofol, in response to altered plasma binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75(4):324–30. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Yoshitani K, Kawaguchi M, Takahashi M, et al. Plasma propofol concentration and EEG burst suppression ratio during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(2):122–6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Mathew PJ, Puri GD, Dhaliwal RS. Propofol requirement titrated to bispectral index: a comparison between hypothermic and normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2009;24(1):27–32. doi: 10.1177/0267659109106071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Beaufort AM, Wierda JM, Belopavlovic M, et al. The influence of hypothermia (surface cooling) on the time-course of action and on the pharmacokinetics of rocuronium in humans. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1995;11:95–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Withington DE, Menard G, Varin F. Cisatracurium pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during hypothermic CPB in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(6):695. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2000.ab01n.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Kaczala GW, Paulus SC, Al-Dajani N, et al. Bloodstream infections in pediatric ECLS: usefulness of daily blood culture monitoring and predictive value of biological markers. The British Columbia experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25(2):169–73. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2299-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.DiCenzo R, Forrest A, Slish JC, et al. A gentamicin pharmacokinetic population model and once-daily dosing algorithm for neonates. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23(5):585–91. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.5.585.32196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Kinderen NKFb. Kinderformularium. Available at: http://www.kinderformularium.nl. Accessed January 1, 2011.
- 161.Martinkova J, Pokorna P, Zahora J, et al. Tolerability and outcomes of kinetically guided therapy with gentamicin in critically ill neonates during the first week of life: an open-label, prospective study. Clin Ther. 2010;32(14):2400–14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302(17):1888–95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Buckley E, Sidebotham D, McGeorge A, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiorespiratory failure in four patients with pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus and secondary bacterial infection. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(3):326–9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Bessereau J, Chenaitia H, Michelet P, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome following 2009 H1N1 virus pandemic: when ECMO come to the patient bedside. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010;29(2):165–6. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Stavchansky S, Tung IL. Effects of hypothermia on drug absorption. Pharm Res. 1987;4(3):248–50. doi: 10.1023/a:1016416413780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Rohrer MJ, Natale AM. Effect of hypothermia on the coagulation cascade. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(10):1402–5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199210000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Watts DD, Trask A, Soeken K, et al. Hypothermic coagulopathy in trauma: effect of varying levels of hypothermia on enzyme speed, platelet function, and fibrinolytic activity. J Trauma. 1998;44(5):846–54. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Valeri CR, Feingold H, Cassidy G, et al. Hypothermia-induced reversible platelet dysfunction. Ann Surg. 1987;205(2):175–81. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198702000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Valeri CR, MacGregor H, Cassidy G, et al. Effects of temperature on bleeding time and clotting time in normal male and female volunteers. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(4):698–704. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199504000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Boldt J, Knothe C, Welters I, et al. Normothermic versus hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: do changes in coagulation differ? Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(1):130–5. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00239-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Hall MW, Goodman PD, Alston SM, et al. Hypothermia-induced platelet aggregation in heparinized flowing human blood: identification of a high responder subpopulation. Am J Hematol. 2002;69(1):45–55. doi: 10.1002/ajh.10018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Xavier RG, White AE, Fox SC, et al. Enhanced platelet aggregation and activation under conditions of hypothermia. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98(6):1266–75. doi: 10.1160/th07-03-0189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ramaker AJ, Meyer P, van der Meer J, et al. Effects of acidosis, alkalosis, hyperthermia and hypothermia on haemostasis: results of point-of-care testing with the thromboelastography analyser. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2009;20(6):436–9. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832dc327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Olivier P, D’Attellis N, Sirieix D, et al. Continuous infusion versus bolus administration of sufentanil and midazolam for mitral valve surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13(1):3–8. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(99)90164-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Green TP, Isham-Schopf B, Irmiter RJ, et al. Inactivation of heparin during extra-corporeal circulation in infants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990;48(2):148–54. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1990.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Oliver WC. Anticoagulation and coagulation management for ECMO. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;13(3):154–75. doi: 10.1177/1089253209347384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Filippi L, la Marca G, Cavallaro G, et al. Phenobarbital for neonatal seizures in hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: a pharmacokinetic study during whole body hypothermia. Epilepsia. 2011;52(4):794–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.02978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.van Dijk M, de Boer JB, Koot HM, et al. The reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants. Pain. 2000;84(2–3):367–77. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, et al. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23(3):293–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]