Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1978 Oct;33(5):608–611. doi: 10.1136/thx.33.5.608

Valve replacement for rheumatic aortic incompetence in adolescents.

E K Weir, R E Matisonn, A S Mitha, B T LeRoux, N M Rogers, E Chesler
PMCID: PMC470943  PMID: 725828

Abstract

The timing of valve replacement in patients with rheumatic aortic regurgitation is assessed by balancing the mortality and complications associated with the operation and the prosthetic valves against the natural history of the lesion. The time course without surgery is determined by the severity of the volume overload and the gradual deterioration of myocardial function. We wished to obtain information both on the haemodynamic recovery achieved after aortic valve replacement in young patients and also on the risks of operation in this group. Twenty patients, in whom the aortic valve was replaced at a mean age of 15 years, were reviewed. An improvement in symptoms and in the cardiothoracic ratio on the chest radiograph occurred in every case, and the voltage measurements suggestive of left ventricular hypertrophy on electrocardiogram diminished in all but two. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure decreased in the 11 patients who were recatheterised after operation. The ejection fraction improved in three patients and stayed the same in three others. While there were no operative deaths in our series the incidence of serious morbidity, in terms of myocardial damage at or after operation, was disappointingly high. Early valve replacement to preserve myocardial function is especially attractive in young patients but cannot be advised if the insertion of the prosthetic valve is associated with appreciable myocardial damage.

Full text

PDF
608

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bolooki H., Kaiser G. Significance of cardiac function in surgical management of patients with valvular heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1976 Feb;37(2):319–321. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90329-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun L. O., Kincaid O. W., McGoon D. C. Prognosis of aortic valve replacement in relation to the preoperative heart size. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973 Mar;65(3):381–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHERIAN G., VYTILINGAM K. I., SUKUMAR I. P., GOPINATH N. MITRAL VALVOTOMY IN YOUNG PATIENTS. Br Heart J. 1964 Mar;26:157–166. doi: 10.1136/hrt.26.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chesler E., Levin S., Du Plessis L., Freiman I., Rogers M., Joffe N. The pattern of rheumatic heart disease in the urbanized Bantu of Johannesburg. S Afr Med J. 1966 Oct 15;40(37):899–904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fischl S. J., Gorlin R., Herman M. V. Cardiac shape and function in aortic valve disease: physiologic and clinical implications. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Feb;39(2):170–176. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(77)80187-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gault J. H., Covell J. W., Braunwald E., Ross J., Jr Left ventricular performance following correction of free aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 1970 Nov;42(5):773–780. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.42.5.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldschlager N., Pfeifer J., Cohn K., Popper R., Selzer A. The natural history of aortic regurgitation. A clinical and hemodynamic study. Am J Med. 1973 May;54(5):577–588. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(73)90115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirshfeld J. W., Jr, Epstein S. E., Roberts A. J., Glancy D. L., Morrow A. G. Indices predicting long-term survival after valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation and patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1974 Dec;50(6):1190–1199. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.50.6.1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mathews R. A., Park S. C., Neches W. H., Lenox C. C., Zuberbuhler J. R., Fricker F. J., Siewers R. D., Hardesty R. L., Lerberg D. B., Bahnson H. T. Valve replacement in children and adolescents. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Jun;73(6):872–876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rahimtoola S. H. Early valve replacement for preservation of ventricular function? Am J Cardiol. 1977 Sep;40(3):472–475. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(77)90175-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts D. L., DeWeese J. A., Mahoney E. B., Yu P. N. Long-term survival following aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 1976 Mar;91(3):311–317. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80214-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SCHRIRE V. The racial incidence of heart disease at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. II. Hypertension and valvular disease of the heart. Am Heart J. 1958 Nov;56(5):742–760. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(58)90217-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SEGAL J., HARVEY W. P., HUFNAGEL C. A clinical study of one hundred cases of severe aortic insufficiency. Am J Med. 1956 Aug;21(2):200–210. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(56)90053-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Selzer A., Cohn K. E. Natural history of mitral stenosis: a review. Circulation. 1972 Apr;45(4):878–890. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.45.4.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spagnuolo M., Kloth H., Taranta A., Doyle E., Pasternack B. Natural history of rheumatic aortic regurgitation. Criteria predictive of death, congestive heart failure, and angina in young patients. Circulation. 1971 Sep;44(3):368–380. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.44.3.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES