Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 2015 Oct 27;94(1):22–29. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.151365

Prevention of neural tube defects by the fortification of flour with folic acid: a population-based retrospective study in Brazil

Prévention des anomalies du tube neural par l’enrichissement en acide folique des farines: étude rétrospective en population au Brésil

La prevención de los defectos del tubo neural mediante el enriquecimiento de la harina con ácido fólico: un estudio poblacional retrospectivo en Brasil

الوقاية من عيوب الأنبوب العصبي عن طريق تعزيز الدقيق بحمض الفوليك: دراسة قائمة على السكان في البرازيل

通过叶酸强化面粉预防神经管缺陷症:巴西地区基于人群的回顾型研究

Профилактика дефектов нервной трубки путем обогащения муки фолиевой кислотой. Ретроспективное популяционное исследование в Бразилии

Leonor Maria Pacheco Santos a,, Roberto Carlos Reyes Lecca b, Juan Jose Cortez-Escalante c, Mauro Niskier Sanchez a, Humberto Gabriel Rodrigues d
PMCID: PMC4709794  PMID: 26769993

Abstract

Objective

To determine if the fortification of wheat and maize flours with iron and folic acid – which became mandatory in Brazil from June 2004 – is effective in the prevention of neural tube defects.

Methods

Using data from national information systems on births in central, south-eastern and southern Brazil, we determined the prevalence of neural tube defects among live births and stillbirths in a pre-fortification period – i.e. 2001–2004 – and in a post-fortification period – i.e. 2005–2014. We distinguished between anencephaly, encephalocele, meningocele, myelomeningocele and other forms of spina bifida.

Findings

There were 8554 neural tube defects for 17 925 729 live births notified between 2001 and 2014. For the same period, 2673 neural tube defects were reported for 194 858 stillbirths. The overall prevalence of neural tube defects fell from 0.79 per 1000 pre-fortification to 0.55 per 1000 post-fortification (prevalence ratio, PR: 1.43; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.38–1.50). For stillbirths, prevalence fell from 17.74 per 1000 stillbirths pre-fortification to 11.70 per 1000 stillbirths post-fortification. The corresponding values among live births were 0.57 and 0.44, respectively.

Conclusion

The introduction of the mandatory fortification of flour with iron and folic acid in Brazil was followed by a significant reduction in the prevalence of neural tube defects in our study area.

Introduction

Neural tube defects, which are detected in about 300 000 neonates worldwide each year, are a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality.1 They are caused by the abnormal closure of the embryonic neural tube between 22 and 28 days after conception. The resulting structural defects, which may occur anywhere along the neuraxis, often lead to the postpartum exposure of neural tissue and this, in turn, may lead to severe impairment in the child’s physical and mental development.2,3

Classically, neural tube defects are divided into two main groups: defects affecting brain structures – such as anencephaly and encephalocele and defects that affect the structures of the spinal cord – such as meningocele, myelomeningocele and other forms of spina bifida.4,5 Anencephaly – also called exencephaly or craniorachischisis – is defined as the complete or partial absence of the brain. This defect, which is caused by a failure of the cephalic neural tube to close,6,7 leads to fetal deaths, stillbirths or neonatal deaths. In encephalocele, the brain and meninges herniate through a skull defect, especially in the occipital region.1 Spina bifida is characterized by the failure of fusion of the vertebral arches of the spine. This defect can be covered by skin – when it is known as spina bifida occulta – or be associated with a cystic protrusion. In meningocele, this protrusion contains abnormal meninges and cerebrospinal fluid. In myelomeningocele, the cystic protrusion contains elements of the spinal cord and/or nerves.

Neural tube defects have been associated with both genetic factors – e.g. simple gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities7 – and maternal factors such as folate intake, age, ethnicity, obesity and the use of antiepileptic drugs.8 If maternal intake of folic acid can be increased around the time of conception, the risk of the occurrence of neural tube defects may be reduced by 60–70%.912 This preventive strategy has been adopted by 78 countries13 that have mandated the addition of folic acid to flour. Such folic acid fortification has already been associated with reductions in the prevalence of neural tube defects in Canada,14 Chile,15 South Africa16 and the United States of America (USA).17

In 2002, Brazil’s Health Surveillance Agency made the fortification of wheat and maize flour with iron and folic acid mandatory in the country from June 2004 – allowing flour producers more than a year to adapt to the new legislation18 All wheat and maize flour sold in Brazil since June 2004 should contain 0.15 mg folic acid per 100 g.18

Although most studies on the prevalence of neural tube defects have been focused on live births, the prevalence of such defects among miscarriages and stillbirths may be higher than that among live births. In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, for example, such defects were detected in 2.8/1000 live births and 5.3/1000 miscarriages at eight weeks of gestation.19 In Northern Ireland and south-east England neural tube defects were 7.1/1000 in live births and 10.8 /1000 in eight-week miscarriages.20

In this population-based retrospective study, we aimed to determine if the mandatory addition of folic acid to flour sold in Brazil was associated with a change in the prevalence of neural tube defects in live and stillbirths.

Methods

Databases

We analysed data that had been routinely collected, in central, south-eastern and southern Brazil, by the national ministry of health and recorded within either the live birth information system database – i.e. as live births – or the mortality information system database – i.e. as stillbirths.

The live birth database was introduced in 1990 but has only included notification of congenital anomalies since 1999. Between 1999 and 2006, only one of the codes of the International classification of diseases and related health problems21 (ICD) could be entered in this database per birth. Since 2007, however, it has been possible to enter multiple codes to cover all of the congenital anomalies present in a child.

Study design

We compared the prevalence of neural tube defects among live births and stillbirths in the pre-fortification period – i.e. 2001–2004 – with that recorded in the post-fortification period – i.e. 2005–2014. In our analyses, we assumed that all children born in 2004 would have been conceived before fortification became mandatory in June 2004. We therefore considered the whole year of 2004 to be pre-fortification.

Defect prevalence

We identified as neural tube defects all anomalies coded Q00, Q01 or Q05 according to the ICD, tenth revision,21 indicative of anencephaly, encephalocele and all forms of spina bifida, respectively.

We only analysed data from the states of central, south-eastern and southern Brazil in which the proportion of all births registered in either the live birth database or the mortality database was estimated to exceed 95%.22,23 The eight states we included were the central states of Distrito Federal and Mato Grosso do Sul, the south-eastern states of Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo and the southern states of Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina.

Study variables

In our analysis we used flour fortification as the independent variable, the presence of at least one neural tube defect as the dependent variable, and maternal age, sex of the neonate or stillborn child and race of the neonate as the predictors. If no information on outcome of a birth had been recorded – i.e. if it was possible that a neural tube defect had been detected but not recorded – that birth was excluded from our analyses (Fig. 1). Maternal age was categorized into three age groups: younger than 20, 20 to 34 and older than 34 years – representing adolescents, young adults and older mothers, respectively. Neonatal race was recorded in the live birth database as black, brown, indigenous or white. No information on stillbirth race was available from the mortality database. The data available on maternal age and sex of the neonates or stillbirths were incomplete.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart for the selection of birth records from the national live birth information and mortality information systems, Brazil, 2001–2014

Data analysis

Data were exported and analysed using Epi Info version 7.0 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA) and Origin 6.0 (Microcal Software, Northampton, USA). The prevalence of any neural tube defect and of defect subtypes coded Q00, Q01 and Q05 were each estimated for the pre-fortification and post-fortification periods. The ratio between each pre-fortification prevalence and the corresponding post-fortification value – and the relevant 95% confidence interval (CI) – was calculated.

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Results

We investigated the records of 19 045 161 live births from the live births database and the records of 194 858 stillbirths from the mortality database. All of the births we investigated occurred between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2014 and together they represented 45.5% of the total (42 285 756) birth records in Brazil for that period. The 17 925 729 valid cases of live births and 194 858 stillbirths used in our analyses included 8554 and 2673 cases of neural tube defects, respectively (Fig. 1).

Table 1 summarizes the prevalence of neural tube defects recorded among all live births and stillbirths. In the pre-fortification period, the prevalence of such defects among all births – i.e. live births and stillbirths combined – was 0.79 per 1000 births. The corresponding post-fortification value was 30.1% lower, at 0.55 per 1000 births. Among the live births, the prevalence of neural tube defects was 22.8% lower post-fortification than pre-fortification: 0.44 versus 0.57 per 1000 live births. Among stillbirths, the prevalence was 34.0% lower post-fortification than pre-fortification: 11.70 versus 17.74 per 1000 stillbirths.

Table 1. Prevalence of neural tube defects before and after the mandatory fortification of flours with folic acid, Brazil, 2001–2014.

Type No. of births investigated No. of births with NTD Prevalence
NTD per 1000 births Ratio
(95% CI)
Change, %
Live births
Pre-fortificationa 4 938 343 2 823 0.57 1.29 (1.24–1.35) −22.8
Post-fortificationb 12 987 386 5 731 0.44 1
Total 17 925 729 8 554
Stillbirths
Pre-fortificationa 65 121 1 155 17.74 1.52 (1.40–1.63) −34.0
Post-fortificationb 129 737 1 518 11.70 1
Total 194 858 2 673
All births
Pre-fortificationa 5 003 464 3 978 0.79 1.43 (1.38–1.50) −30.1
Post-fortificationb 13 117 123 7 249 0.55 1
Total 18 120 587 11 227

CI: confidence interval; NTD: neural tube defect.

a The pre-fortification study period ran from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2004 – although fortification became mandatory in June 2014.

b The post-fortification study period, which ran from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014, was used as the reference category in the calculation of prevalence ratios.

The prevalence of spina bifida and, particularly, anencephaly were lower post-fortification than pre-fortification among both live births and stillbirths (Table 2). Although we found the prevalence of encephalocele among stillbirths to be higher post-fortification than pre-fortification, this defect was only reported for 39 stillbirths.

Table 2. Prevalence of anencephaly, encephalocele and spina bifida before and after mandatory folic acid fortification of flour, Brazil, 2001–2014.

Type of birth defect Pre-fortificationa
Post-fortificationb
Prevalence change,
%
No. of cases Prevalence, cases per 1000 births No. of cases Prevalence, cases per 1000 births
Live births
Anencephaly 1035 0.21 2063 0.16 −24.2
Encephalocele 388 0.08 871 0.07 −14.6
Spina bifida 1400 0.28 2832 0.22 −23.1
Stillbirths
Anencephaly 1056 16.22 1322 10.19 −37.2
Encephalocele 39 0.60 95 0.73 22.3
Spina bifida 80 1.23 123 0.95 −22.8
All births
Anencephaly 2091 0.42 3385 0.26 −38.3
Encephalocele 427 0.09 966 0.07 −13.7
Spina bifida 1480 0.30 2955 0.23 −23.8

a The pre-fortification study period ran from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2004 – although fortification became mandatory in June 2014. We analysed the data for 4 938 343 live births and 65 121 still births that occurred during this period.

b The post-fortification study period ran from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014. We analysed the data for 12 987 386 live births and 129 737 still births that occurred during this period.

The apparent effects of maternal age and sex and race of the child on the prevalence of neural tube defects are summarized in Table 3. In the pre-fortification study period, compared with mothers aged 20–34 years, adolescents were 34% more likely to give birth to a still or liveborn child with a neural tube defect. In the same period, there appeared to be a 40% higher probability of a neural tube defect in a female neonate or stillbirth than in a male one. Although, pre-fortification, the prevalence of neural tube defects was higher among indigenous neonates than among black, brown or white neonates, the differences in prevalence between black, brown and indigenous neonates were not statistically significant – probably because relatively few indigenous neonates were included in our analyses. Folic acid fortification appears to have lowered the prevalence of neural tube defects by 37.7% among the offspring of adolescent mothers and by 36.5% among female neonates and stillbirths.

Table 3. Neonatal and maternal characteristics and the prevalence of neural tube defects before and after mandatory folic acid fortification of flour, Brazil, 2001–2014.

Characteristic Pre-fortificationa
Post-fortificationb
Prevalence change %
No. of births (% of total) No. of NTD Prevalence
No. of births (% of total) No. of NTD Prevalence
NTD per 1000 births Ratio
(95% CI)
NTD per 1000 births Ratio
(95% CI)
Maternal age, years c
< 20 971 805 (19.5) 915 0.94 1.34 (1.2–1.4) 2 221 078 (17.0) 1 302 0.59 1.13 (1.1–1.2) –37.7
20–34d 3 488 203 (70.0) 2 449 0.70 1 9 232 150 (70.5) 4 780 0.52 1 –26.3
> 34 526 589 (10.6) 371 0.70 1.00 (0.9–1.1) 1 640 707 (12.5) 938 0.57 1.10 (1.0–1.2) –18.9
Total 4 986 597 (100.0) 13 093 935 (100.0)
Sex of neonate or stillbirthe
Female 2 437 225 (48.8) 2 264 0.93 1.44 (1.3–1.5) 6 393 203 (48.8) 3 769 0.59 1.18 (1.1–1.2) –36.5
Malef 2 560 657 (51.2) 1 656 0.65 1 6 718 656 (51.2) 3 368 0.50 1 –22.5
Total 4 997 882 (100.0) 13 111 859 (100.0)
Race of neonateg
White 3 505 035 (77.4) 1 983 0.57 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 8 730 308 (69.4) 3 895 0.45 1.05 (1.0–1.1) –21.1
Brown h 880 425 (19.5) 439 0.50 1 3 347 507 (26.6) 1 422 0.42 1 –14.8
Black 122 622 (2.7) 73 0.60 1.2 (0.9–1.5) 454 023 (3.6) 204 0.45 1.06 (0.8–1.3) –24.5
Indigenous 15 930 (0.3) 13 0.82 1.6 (0.9–2.8) 41 980 (0.3) 21 0.50 1.18 (0.8–1.8) –38.7
Total 4 524 012 (100.0) 12 573 818 (100.0)

CI: confidence interval; NTD: neural tube defects.

a The pre-fortification study period ran from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2004 – although fortification became mandatory in June 2014.

b The post-fortification study period ran from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014.

c Maternal age was missing in 0.22% of the records.

d Used as the reference category in the calculation of prevalence ratios for maternal age.

e Sex of neonate or stillbirth was missing in 0.06% of the records.

f Used as the reference category in the calculation of prevalence ratios for sex of neonate or stillbirth.

g As no data on race were available for stillbirths, the data reported for race refer only to live births.

h Used as the reference category in the calculation of prevalence ratios for race of neonate.

Although the pre-fortification and post-fortification study subjects were similar in terms of the sex distribution of the neonates or stillbirths, they differed slightly in terms of maternal age and neonatal race (Table 3).

Discussion

Our finding of a decreased prevalence of neural tube defects after mandatory fortification of flour with folic acid confirms observations made in two previous Brazilian studies.24,25 One study investigated births in 19 hospitals that together represented 1% of all births in Brazil, and found a reduction in prevalence of 22.1% – from 1.04/1000 births pre-fortification to 0.81/1000 births post-fortification.24 The other study compared the prevalence of spina bifida in live births for one year pre-fortification and one year post-fortification, and reported a 39.1% reduction; 0.23/1000 to 0.14/1000 births.25 This study, however, included data from states where a substantial proportion of births are not recorded in the live birth database.25 Our study covers a longer period, a higher proportion of Brazilian births and all common forms of neural tube defects.

The reduction that we observed in the prevalence of neural tube defects in Brazil is higher than the corresponding reduction reported in the USA (19%),17 very similar to the reduction observed in South Africa (30.5%)16 and lower than the reductions reported in Chile (40%),15 Canada (46%)14 and – for anencephaly and spina bifida only – Argentina (58–60%).24 A meta-analysis of eight population-based studies on the fortification of flour or other foodstuffs with folic acid estimated the mean reduction in the prevalence of neural tube defects to be 46%.11 Although 78 countries have now made fortification of some foodstuffs with folic acid mandatory,13 only five have evaluated the effectiveness of such an intervention in the improvement of health outcomes.11

In our study, anencephaly was the most common type of neural tube defect, followed by spina bifida and then encephalocele. Although spina bifida has often been reported as the most common form of defect – followed by anencephaly and then encephalocele.24 Earlier reports on this topic have focused on live births whereas we investigated neural tube defects in both live births and stillbirths. It appears that, in Brazil at least, spina bifida occurs more frequently in stillbirths than in live births. The use of data from live births alone may lead to underestimates in the overall prevalence of neural tube defects.19,20

As seen in this and other studies,14,2628 neural tube defects occur more often among female neonates and stillbirths than among males. Although the link between such defects and sex is probably complex, a female fetus requires more human chorionic gonadotropin than a male fetus and deficiencies in this hormone can increase the risk of neural tube defects. The neural tube closes in the first four weeks of embryonic development – i.e. well before the concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin in the fetus peaks on days 40–50 post-fertilization.29,30

In the present study, the prevalence of neural tube defects was found to be highest among indigenous neonates, closely followed by black neonates – although it should be noted that there were relatively few birth or death records of indigenous neonates. A study in Canada also found that the risk of neural tube defects was highest among indigenous neonates.31 Researchers in the USA found that the risk of neural tube defects in pregnancy was twice as high for women of Mexican descent than for white women.32

The effect of maternal age on the risk of neural tube defects is generally considered to be small. When any such association is observed, the prevalence of neural tube defects tends to be relatively high among those born to mothers in the youngest and oldest age groups.33 It is possible that the diets of adolescent mothers fail to satisfy the combined nutrient requirements for the growth of both the mother and her fetus. Another possibility is that, compared with older women, adolescent women are less likely to take supplements that contain folic acid.34 It remains unclear why older mothers might be at relatively high risk of giving birth to a child with a neural tube defect.

The public reporting of health data allows health planners to take evidence-informed policy decisions and helps foster a culture of accountability, transparency and efficiency.35,36 The relative completeness and reliability of Brazil’s live birth database and mortality information database were essential to the success of our study. Although the public reporting of demographic and health-care data in Brazil began in the 1970s, it was only after the implementation of the national public health system in the mid-1980s that the Brazilian Ministry of Health and other investigators concentrated efforts to guarantee the quality of the data being collected. There has been much evidence of the success of these efforts,35,3739 including the results of a case–control study40 and active searches for unreported births and deaths.41,42 In 2010, the United Nations Children’s Fund acknowledged the political commitment to improving the health information systems in Brazil, especially those recording data on births and infant deaths.43 Brazil’s health information systems are now in line with the World Health Organization’s push towards evidence-informed policy.44

A possible source of bias in this study is the termination of pregnancy when the fetus is found to be anencephalic. Although abortion is illegal in Brazil, individual court rulings may override the law. However, there is so much bureaucracy involved in such cases that few abortions are permitted. We were unable to investigate – or control for – the effects of birth order, which is not recorded in either of the information systems we used. We assumed that children born in the second trimester of 2004 would not have benefited from maternal consumption of flour fortified with folic acid. It remains possible that some of these children did benefit but this would indicate that the benefits of fortification were even greater than those we presented.

Conclusion

Our results show that the introduction of the mandatory fortification of flour with folic acid in Brazil was followed by a significant reduction in the incidence of neural tube defects in the centre, south-east and south of the country.

Funding:

The Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) partially supported this work via a research fellowship awarded to LMPS.

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

  • 1.Botto LD, Moore CA, Khoury MJ, Erickson JD. Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1999. November 11;341(20):1509–19. 10.1056/NEJM199911113412006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grillo E, da Silva RJ. [Neural tube defects and congenital hydrocephalus. Why is prevalence important?] J Pediatr (Rio J). 2003. Mar-Apr;79(2):105–6. Portuguese. 10.2223/JPED.960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tamura T, Picciano MF. Folate and human reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006. May;83(5):993–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Molloy AM. The role of folic acid in the prevention of neural tube defects. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16(6-7):241–5. 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.03.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Tratado de cirurgia. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pitkin RM. Folate and neural tube defects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007. January;85(1) suppl:285S–8S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pulikkunnel ST, Thomas SV. Neural tube defects: pathogenesis and folate metabolism. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005. February;53:127–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Frey L, Hauser WA. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia. 2003;44 Suppl 3:4–13. 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s3.2.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laurence KM, James N, Miller MH, Tennant GB, Campbell H. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of folate treatment before conception to prevent recurrence of neural-tube defects. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981. May 9;282(6275):1509–11. 10.1136/bmj.282.6275.1509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Czeizel AE, Dudás I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992. December 24;327(26):1832–5. 10.1056/NEJM199212243272602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blencowe H, Cousens S, Modell B, Lawn J. Folic acid to reduce neonatal mortality from neural tube disorders. Int J Epidemiol. 2010. April;39 Suppl 1:i110–21. 10.1093/ije/dyq028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De-Regil LM, Fernández-Gaxiola AC, Dowswell T, Peña-Rosas JP. Effects and safety of periconceptional folate supplementation for preventing birth defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10(10):CD007950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Global progress [Internet]. Atlanta: Food Fortification Initiative; 2015. Available from: http://www.ffinetwork.org/global_progress [cited 2015 Oct 4].
  • 14.De Wals P, Tairou F, Van Allen MI, Uh SH, Lowry RB, Sibbald B, et al. Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2007. July 12;357(2):135–42. 10.1056/NEJMoa067103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hertrampf E, Cortés F. Folic acid fortification of wheat flour: Chile. Nutr Rev. 2004. June;62(6 Pt 2):S44–8, discussion S49. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00074.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sayed AR, Bourne D, Pattinson R, Nixon J, Henderson B. Decline in the prevalence of neural tube defects following folic acid fortification and its cost-benefit in South Africa. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008. April;82(4):211–6. 10.1002/bdra.20442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, Erickson JD, Wong LY. Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 2001. June 20;285(23):2981–6. 10.1001/jama.285.23.2981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Resolução - RDC nº 344, de 13 de dezembro de 2002. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Ministério da Saúde; 2002. Available from: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/f851a500474580668c83dc3fbc4c6735/RDC_344_2002.pdf?MOD=AJPERES [cited 2015 Oct 4]. Portuguese.
  • 19.Creasy MR, Alberman ED. Congenital malformations of the central nervous system in spontaneous abortions. J Med Genet. 1976. February;13(1):9–16. 10.1136/jmg.13.1.9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.MacHenry JCRM, Nevin NC, Merrett JD. Comparison of central nervous system malformations in spontaneous abortions in Northern Ireland and south-east England. BMJ. 1979. May 26;1(6175):1395–7. 10.1136/bmj.1.6175.1395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.International classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Razão entre nascidos vivos informados e estimados, Brasil 2000–2011. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/idb2012/a17b.htm [cited 2015 Oct 4]. Portuguese.
  • 23.Razão entre óbitos informados e estimados, Brasil 2000–2011. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/idb2012/a1801b.htm [cited 2015 Oct 4]. Portuguese.
  • 24.López-Camelo JS, Castilla EE, Orioli IMINAGEMP (Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional) ECLAMC (Estudio Colaborativo Latino Americano de Malformaciones Congénitas). Folic acid flour fortification: impact on the frequencies of 52 congenital anomaly types in three South American countries. Am J Med Genet A. 2010. October;152A(10):2444–58. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Orioli IM, Lima do Nascimento R, López-Camelo JS, Castilla EE. Effects of folic acid fortification on spina bifida prevalence in Brazil. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011. September;91(9):831–5. 10.1002/bdra.20830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stevenson RE, Allen WP, Pai GS, Best R, Seaver LH, Dean J, et al. Decline in prevalence of neural tube defects in a high-risk region of the United States. Pediatrics. 2000. October;106(4):677–83. 10.1542/peds.106.4.677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pacheco SS, Souza AI, Vidal AS, Guerra GV, Batista-Filho M, Baptista EVP, et al. Prevalência dos defeitos de fechamento do tubo neural em recém-nascidos do Centro de Atenção à Mulher do Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira, IMIP: 2000-2004. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2006;6 Suppl 1:35–42. [Portuguese.] 10.1590/S1519-38292006000500005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Afshar M, Golalipour MJ, Farhud D. Epidemiologic aspects of neural tube defects in South East Iran. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2006. October;11(4):289–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Janerich DT. Female excess in anencephaly and spina bifida: possible gestational influences. Am J Epidemiol. 1975. January;101(1):70–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Serrato FF. Defectos de tubo neural en hijos de mujeres expuestas a contaminantes ambientales em la zona metropolitana de Guadalajara 2003-2005. Arch Neurocien (Mex). 2006;11(3):146–52. Spanish. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Meier C, Cole DEC, Wyatt PR. Maternal ethnicity and risk of neural tube defects: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2004. August 17;171(4):343–5. 10.1503/cmaj.1040254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shaw GM, Velie EM, Wasserman CR. Risk for neural tube defect-affected pregnancies among women of Mexican descent and white women in California. Am J Public Health. 1997. September;87(9):1467–71. 10.2105/AJPH.87.9.1467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fujimori E, Baldino CF, Sato APS, Borges ALV, Gomes MN. [Prevalence and spatial distribution of neural tube defects in São Paulo State, Brazil, before and after folic acid flour fortification]. Cad Saude Publica. 2013. January;29(1):145–54. Portuguese. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Langley-Evans SC, Langley-Evans AJ. Use of folic acid supplements in the first trimester of pregnancy. J R Soc Promot Health. 2002. September;122(3):181–6. 10.1177/146642400212200315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jorge MH, Laurenti R, Gotlieb SLD. [Quality analysis of Brazilian vital statistics: the experience of implementing the SIM and SINASC systems]. Cien Saude Colet. 2007. May-Jun;12(3):643–54. Portuguese. 10.1590/S1413-81232007000300014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sharma K, Metzler I, Chen S, Mayer JE Jr, Meara J. Public reporting of healthcare data: a new frontier in quality improvement. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2012. June;97(6):6–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Theme Filha MM, Gama SGN, Cunha CB, Leal MC. [Reliability of birth certificate data in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999–2001]. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20 Suppl 1:S83–91. Portuguese. 10.1590/S0102-311X2004000700009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Romero DE, Cunha CB. [Evaluation of quality of epidemiological and demographic variables in the Live Births Information System, 2002]. Cad Saude Publica. 2007. March;23(3):701–14. Portuguese. 10.1590/S0102-311X2007000300028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Andrade CL, Szwarcwald CL. [Socio-spatial inequalities in the adequacy of Ministry of Health data on births and deaths at the municipal level in Brazil, 2000–2002]. Cad Saude Publica. 2007. May;23(5):1207–16. Portuguese. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Almeida MF, Alencar GP, França I Jr, Novaes HMD, Siqueira AAF, Schoeps D, et al. [Validation of birth certificates based on data from a case-control study]. Cad Saude Publica. 2006. March;22(3):643–52. Portuguese. 10.1590/S0102-311X2006000300019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Façanha MC, Pinheiro AC, Fauth S, Lima AWDBC, Silva VLP, et al. [Active searches for deaths in cemeteries in the Metropolitan Area of Fortaleza, 1999 to 2000]. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2003;12(3):131–6. Portuguese. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Szwarcwald CL, Morais Neto OL, Frias PG, Souza Jr PRB, Cortez-Escalante JJC, Lima RB, et al. Busca ativa de óbitos e nascimentos no Nordeste e na Amazônia Legal: estimação das coberturas do SIM e do SINASC nos municípios brasileiros. In: Barbosa da Silva Jr J, Morais Neto OL, Cortez-Escalante JJC, Duarte EC, Garcia LP, Gil E, editors. Saúde Brasil 2010; uma análise da situação de saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011. pp. 79–98. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_brasil_2010.pdf [cited 2015 Oct 4]. Portuguese. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Good practices in integrating birth registration into health systems (2000-2009). Case studies: Bangladesh, Brazil, Gambia and Delhi, India. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2010. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/protection/Birth_Registration_Working_Paper(2).pdf [cited 2014 Jun 28].
  • 44.Peña-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Rogers LM, Bopardikar A, Panisset U. Translating research into action: WHO evidence-informed guidelines for safe and effective micronutrient interventions. J Nutr. 2012. January;142(1):197S–204S. 10.3945/jn.111.138834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES