Abstract
Background
To diagnose cutaneous adverse food reactions (CAFRs) in dogs and cats, dietary restriction-provocation trials are performed. Knowing the most common offending food allergens for these species would help determining the order of food challenges to optimize the time to diagnosis.
Results
The search for, and review and analysis of the best evidence available as of January 16, 2015 suggests that the most likely food allergens contributing to canine CAFRs are beef, dairy products, chicken, and wheat. The most common food allergens in cats are beef, fish and chicken.
Conclusions
In dogs and cats, after a period of dietary restriction leading to the complete remission of clinical signs, food challenges to diagnose CAFR should begin with beef and dairy products, the most commonly recognized food allergens in these two species.
Keywords: Allergen, Allergy, Atopic dermatitis, Canine, Cat, Dietary, Dog, Feline, Food allergy
Background
The diagnosis of cutaneous adverse food reactions (CAFRs) in dogs and cats relies on the performance of dietary restriction-provocation trials. Knowing the most common offending allergens in these species would help determine which food challenges should be performed first to faster confirm the diagnosis of CAFR.
Clinical scenarios
You have two patients: The first is a 1-year-old male Labrador retriever with a 3-month history of pruritus and recurrent mucous diarrhea. This dog has been eating a commercial diet for the last 6 months. On physical examination, you do not detect anomalies besides soft stools on rectal palpation. Your second patient is a 2-year-old female spayed Persian cat that has been scratching her face for the last year. This self-trauma only responds partially to high dose of prednisolone. Physical examination reveals the cat to be thinner than expected and to have excoriations on the head and neck. You suspect that both patients could be reactive to their commercial diets, but you wonder which one of the ingredients listed on the labels would be the most likely sources of allergens.
Structured question
In dogs and cats suspected of CAFR, which food sources are most often reported to induce clinical signs after challenge?
Search strategy
The CAB Abstracts and Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) databases were searched on January 16, 2015, using the following string: ((dog or dogs or canine) or (cat or cats or feline)) and (food or diet*) and (allerg* or atop* or hypersens* or intolerance). The search was limited to the period 1985 to 2015. Bibliographies of identified articles were then further searched for additional relevant reports.
Identified evidence
Our literature search identified 140 and 1534 citations in CAB Abstracts and Web of Science, of which three [1–3] and 15 [1, 3–17] respectively contained relevant information. Citations that were not selected were those of articles not specifically identifying offending allergens in dogs and cats exhibiting clinical signs of CAFR. Six more relevant citations were identified in the bibliography of articles found with the electronic search [18–22], and three sources were abstracts of recent conference proceedings [23–25]. Offending allergens were reported in case reports [12, 14, 18, 22, 26] or case series of dogs and cats with clinical evidence of adverse food reaction [1–5, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 25, 27], in studies evaluating diagnostic techniques for adverse food reactions [5, 8, 9, 11, 17, 23, 24] or (rarely) in studies evaluating reaction patterns such as vasculitis or symmetrical lupoid onychitis with multiple causes [20, 21]. A positive rechallenge was considered the only solid evidence for identifying an offending allergen. From these selected publications, we added the number of cases in which positive challenges had occurred with the various food items, and the frequency of reaction among total number of dogs was calculated.
Evaluation of evidence
Altogether, at least one offending food allergen source was reported in each of the 297 dogs included in the selected studies [2, 4, 5, 7–13, 16–18, 20, 21, 23–26] (Table 1). The most frequently reported food allergens involved in CAFRs in dogs were beef (102 dogs, 34 %), dairy products (51 dogs, 17 %), chicken (45 dogs, 15 %), wheat (38 dogs, 13 %) and lamb (14, 5 %). Other less commonly reported offending food sources were soy (18 dogs, 6 %), corn (13 dogs, 4 %), egg (11 dogs, 4 %), pork (7 dogs, 2 %), fish and rice (5 dogs each, 2 %). Barley, rabbit, chocolate, kidney bean and tomato were also reported as food allergens for single dogs.
Table 1.
Reference | Number of dogs | Number of individual rechallenges per dog | Details of rechallenges | Offending allergens and comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Walton [2] | 82 | unclear | unclear | cow's milk (22), tinned food (16), beef (13), wheat (11), mutton (6), egg, pork (3 each), herring (2), cod, maize, rabbit, dog biscuits, kidney bean (1 each) |
Chesney [4] | 19 | unclear, but only 9 owners rechallenged their dogs | unclear | beef (4), milk (3), chicken, dog biscuit (2 each), cheese, turkey, pork (1 each) |
Guilford et al. [5] | 8 | 3 to 6 | rechallenge with corn, soy, cow's milk (8/8 each), wheat (2/8), lamb (7/8), beef (3/8) (14-16 g of each, once daily for 14 days) | corn (2), wheat, milk (1 each) |
Harvey [7] | 25 | at least 6 | 1 week of beef, milk, cheese, egg, mixer biscuit, bread in all dogs, additionally chicken, lamb and chocolate one each in 3 of the dogs | bread and mixer biscuit (same 7 dogs), cheese and milk (same 7 dogs), beef (2), egg, lamb, chocolate (1 each) |
Ishida et al. [8] | 8 | 9 | beef, chicken, chicken egg, wheat, corn, rice, tuna, cod, milk (increasing to 120 g daily for 7 days) | beef (5), rice (3), egg, wheat, cod (1 each) |
Jeffers et al. [9] | 13 | 6 | beef, cow's milk, chicken, chicken egg, soybean, wheat for 1 week each | beef (12), milk (5), wheat (4), chicken, soybean (3 each), egg (2) |
Jeffers et al. [10] | 25 | 5 | beef, chicken, chicken eggs, cow's milk, soy for 1 week each | beef (15), soy (8), chicken, milk (7 each), wheat (6), 5 (egg) |
Mueller and Tsohalis [11] | 8 | unclear | unclear | beef (7), dairy (1), chicken (1) |
Ohmori et al. [12] | 1 | unclear | unclear | beef |
Paterson [13] | 20 | at least 5 | Beef, dairy products, wheat, lamb and chicken for one week each as one additional test meal while on elimination diet followed by other allergens based on diet history | beef (13), lamb (5), gluten, egg (4 each), chicken, milk, pork (2 each), soy, corn (1 each) |
Salzo [16] | 20 | unclear | 7 days of rechallenge | beef (11), chicken (7), rice (5), milk, wheat (1 each) |
Vaden et al. [17] | 6 | 7 | 1 meal containing a different allergen every other day | chicken, corn (5 each), tofu (3), cottage cheese, wheat, lamb (2) |
Coyner [18] | 1 | 1 | unclear | beef |
Mueller et al. [20] | 1 | 5 | rechallenge with beef, cow's milk, chicken, mutton, wheat, details unclear | beef |
Nicholls et al. [21] | 2 | unclear | unclear | beef (2) |
Johansen et al. [23] | 4 | unclear | unclear | beef (2), pork, salmon (1 each) |
Johansen et al. [24] | 5 | unclear | unclear | chicken (5), corn (3), but preselected out of a population with such allergies |
Tarpataki and Nagy [25] | 39 | unclear | unclear | chicken (16), beef (12) |
Fujimura et al. [26] | 1 | 1 | 10 g of fresh tomato led to clinical signs within 30 minutes | tomato |
At least one food allergen was identified in each one of the 78 cats reported in selected articles [1–3, 6, 14, 19, 22, 27] (Table 2) . The food sources most frequently causing CAFR in cats were beef (14 cats, 18 %), fish (13 cats, 17 %), chicken (4 cats, 5 %), wheat, corn and dairy products (3 cats each, 4 %) and lamb (2 cats, 3 %). Egg, barley and rabbit were also reported as offending allergens in individual cats.
Table 2.
Reference | Number of cats | Number of individual rechallenges per cat | Details of rechallenges | Offending allergens and comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stogdale [1] | 2 | 6 in 1 cat, unclear in the other | Chicken, fish, beef, horse, mutton, milk in one cat, various fresh meats and commercial foods in the other cat, details unclear | chicken, fish, beef in the first cat, and not chicken and fish in the other cat (all other meats led to deterioration) |
Walton [2] | 18 | unclear | unclear | cow's milk (7), beef (5), rabbit, chicken, whale meat (1 each) |
White and Sequoia [3] | 14 | unclear | various commercial diets, dairy products, fish were administered to 11 of 14 cats further details were not provided | fish (6), dairy products (2) |
Guilford et al. [6] | 16 | unclear, depending on the diet history | 15-50 g of allergen daily for 7 days | beef, corn, wheat (3 each), gluten, barley, chicken, lamb, sardines, lactose, viscera, food additives (1 each) |
Reedy [14] | 1 | 2 | 3 days of tuna and lamb | tuna, lamb (1) |
Guaguère [19] | 10 | unclear | 2 weeks with each allergen | beef (4), milk (3), fish (2), egg (1) |
Walton et al. [22] | 1 | unclear | 7 days with each allergen | milk |
Vogelnest and Cheng [27] | 17 | beef, chicken, lamb, fish, diary, wheat for 7 days each (attempted only in 8 cats and completed in 6 of them) | fish (2), chicken (1), beef (1) |
There were several limitations in interpreting the data presented. In most studies details of the provocation with individual allergens were not provided. Furthermore, most reports only listed allergens associated with a deterioration of signs upon rechallenge, but not those associated with negative provocations; this could possibly bias the estimation of the prevalence of offending allergens. Only five studies had used a standardized rechallenge sequence in dogs [7–10, 13]. In these studies, beef, chicken, wheat, soy and dairy products were the most common involved allergens, reflecting the data gathered from the literature. In cats, only one study attempted those uniform provocations [27], and beef, fish and chicken were the allergens most commonly involved in that study. In addition the previous diet history was generally not provided, thereby preventing a clinically relevant interpretation of the data. Thus, the information gathered herein does not allow a true estimate of the prevalence of offending allergens nor any statement about the likelihood of positive provocations in relation to previously fed foods. Finally, the offending allergens found herein could merely reflect pet feeding habits in the preceding decades, and these allergens could change once new pet foods become fashionable and used more frequently.
Conclusion and implication for practitioners
In a dog living in Australia, Europe or North America, the allergens most likely contributing to CAFRs are beef, dairy products, chicken, wheat and lamb. As a result, these foods should be the first used for allergen provocation for CAFR diagnosis. In cats, the most common allergens causing CAFRs are beef, fish and chicken.
Importantly, the identified evidence does not allow an estimation of the real prevalence of offending allergens in the population of dogs and cats with CAFR, as animals were usually only challenged with a small number of—but not all— allergens. As a result, the true prevalence of each offending allergens in dogs and cats is likely to be higher than that reported above.
Importantly, all these estimates of prevalence will need to be reevaluated with prospective studies performing controlled rechallenges in a larger number of animals with a detailed history of their previous dietary exposure.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Drs. Philippe Marniquet, Isabelle Mougeot and Sara Soler from Royal Canin for the initiation and support of this series of critically appraised topics on adverse food reactions and for paying publication charges for this article.
Abbreviations
- CAFR
cutaneous adverse food reaction
- CAT
critically-appraised topic
Footnotes
Competing interests
In the past three years, the three authors have lectured for, and received research funding and/or consulting honoraria from Royal Canin (Aimargues, France), which paid publication charges for this article.
Authors’ contributions
The three authors selected the topic of this CAT. RSM performed the literature search, extracted and summarized the evidence. TO and PP verified the evidence and TO wrote the first draft of the article. The three authors edited and then approved the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Stogdale L, Bomzon L, Bland van den Berg P. Food allergy in cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1982;18:188–194. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walton GS. Skin responses in the dog and cat to ingested allergens. Vet Rec. 1967;81:709–713. doi: 10.1136/vr.81.27.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.White SD, Sequoia D. Food hypersensitivity in cats: 14 cases (1982–1987) J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989;194:692–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chesney CJ. Food sensitivity in the dog: a quantitative study. J Small Anim Pract. 2002;43:203–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2002.tb00058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guilford WG, Strombeck DR, Rogers Q, et al. Development of gastroscopic food sensitivity testing in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 1994;8:414–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1994.tb03261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guilford WG, Jones BR, Markwell PJ, et al. Food sensitivity in cats with chronic idiopathic gastrointestinal problems. J Vet Intern Med. 2001;15:7–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2001.tb02291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harvey RG. Food allergy and dietary intolerance in dogs - a report of 25 cases. J of Small Animal Pract. 1993;34:175–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1993.tb02647.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ishida R, Masuda K, Sakaguchi M, et al. Antigen-specific histamine release in dogs with food hypersensitivity. J Vet Med Sci. 2003;65:435–438. doi: 10.1292/jvms.65.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jeffers JG, Shanley KJ, Meyer EK. Diagnostic testing of dogs for food hypersensitivity. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991;198:245–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jeffers JG, Meyer EK, Sosis EJ. Responses of dogs with food allergies to single-ingredient dietary provocation. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996;209:608–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mueller RS, Tsohalis J. Evaluation of serum allergen-specific IgE for the diagnosis of food adverse reactions in the dog. Vet Dermatol. 1998;9:167–171. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.1998.00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ohmori K, Masuda K, Kawarai S, et al. Identification of bovine serum albumin as an IgE-reactive beef component in a dog with food hypersensitivity against beef. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69:865–867. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Paterson S. Food hypersensitivity in 20 dogs with skin and gastrointestinal signs. J Small Anim Pract. 1995;36:529–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1995.tb02803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reedy LM. Food hypersensitivity to lamb in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994;204:1039–1040. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Roudebush P. Ingredients and foods associated with adverse reactions in dogs and cats. Vet Dermatol. 2013;24:293–294. doi: 10.1111/vde.12014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Salzo PS, Larsson CE. Hipersensibilidade alimentar em caes. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2009;61:598–605. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352009000300012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vaden SL, Hammerberg B, Davenport DJ, et al. Food hypersensitivity reactions in Soft Coated Wheaten Terriers with protein-losing enteropathy or protein-losing nephropathy or both: gastroscopic food sensitivity testing, dietary provocation, and fecal immunoglobulin E. J Vet Intern Med. 2000;14:60–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb01501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Coyner K. Otomycosis due to Aspergillus spp. in a dog: case report and literature review. Vet Dermatol. 2010;21:613–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2010.00903.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guaguère E. Intolérance alimentaire à manifestations cutanées: à propos de 17 cas chez le chat. Prat Med Chir Anim Comp. 1993;28:451–460. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mueller RS, Friend S, Shipstone MA, et al. Diagnosis of claw disease - a prospective study of 24 dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2000;11:133–141. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.2000.00174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nichols PR, Morris DO, Beale KM. A retrospective study of canine and feline cutaneous vasculitis. Vet Dermatol. 2001;12:255–264. doi: 10.1046/j.0959-4493.2001.00268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walton GS, Parish WE, Coombs RRA. Spontaneous allergic dermatitis and enteritis in a cat. Vet Rec. 1968;83:35–41. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Johansen C, Mariani C, Mueller RS. Patch testing with predigested proteins in sensitized dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2012;23:61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2011.00989.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Johansen C, Mariani C, Mueller RS. Patch testing with feather hydrolysate, corn starch and a commercial diet containing corn starch and feather hydrolysate in chicken- and corn-allergic dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2012;23:62. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tarpataki N, Nagy T. The occurence and the features of food allergy in Hungarian dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2012;23:55. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fujimura M, Ohmori K, Masuda K, et al. Oral allergy syndrome induced by tomato in a dog with Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollinosis. J Vet Med Sci. 2002;64:1069–1070. doi: 10.1292/jvms.64.1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vogelnest LJ, Cheng KY. Cutaneous adverse food reactions in cats: retrospective evaluation of 17 cases in a dermatology referral population (2001–2011) Aust Vet J. 2013;91:443–451. doi: 10.1111/avj.12112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]