Abstract
The amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of H1 histone are afforded an opportunity to bind to their own coding segments. While such binding is of no consequence to the type of H1 histone that is expressed only in terminally differentiated cells (here referred to as H5), the same binding occurring in H1 of proliferating cells might affect the course of evolution of its amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions. With the above in mind, amino acid sequences of H5 from three species were compared with those of H1 from five species. The spherical core was more conserved in H1 than in H5, whereas the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of both were hypervariable. A distinct evolutionary pattern, however, was observed only in these regions of H1 but not of H5. Tandem repeats of short palindromes often generated nearly identical long palindromes in distantly related species. Thus, as far as the 37-residue-long amino-terminal region was concerned, the greatest homology was between the rat and human rather than between the rat and the mouse. With regard to the last 25 residues in the carboxyl-terminal region, the greatest homology was between the chicken and the rainbow trout; the next was between the mouse and the trout. Successions of long palindromes populating the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of H1 might be the direct consequence of the autologous binding between peptides and their coding sequence.
Full text
PDF




Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Albig W., Kardalinou E., Drabent B., Zimmer A., Doenecke D. Isolation and characterization of two human H1 histone genes within clusters of core histone genes. Genomics. 1991 Aug;10(4):940–948. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90183-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briand G., Kmiecik D., Sautiere P., Wouters D., Borie-Loy O., Biserte G., Mazen A., Champagne M. Chicken erythrocyte histone H5. IV. Sequence of the carboxy-termined half of the molecule (96 residues) and complete sequence. FEBS Lett. 1980 Apr 7;112(2):147–151. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80167-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole K. D., Kandala J. C., Kremer E., Kistler W. S. Isolation of a genomic clone encoding the rat histone variant, H1d. Gene. 1990 May 14;89(2):265–269. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90015-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doenecke D., Tönjes R. Conserved dyad symmetry structures at the 3' end of H5 histone genes. Analysis of the duck H5 gene. J Mol Biol. 1984 Sep 15;178(2):121–135. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90135-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doenecke D., Tönjes R. Differential distribution of lysine and arginine residues in the closely related histones H1 and H5. Analysis of a human H1 gene. J Mol Biol. 1986 Feb 5;187(3):461–464. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90446-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jost J. P., Hofsteenge J. The repressor MDBP-2 is a member of the histone H1 family that binds preferentially in vitro and in vivo to methylated nonspecific DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9499–9503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mezquita J., Connor W., Winkfein R. J., Dixon G. H. An H1 histone gene from rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii). J Mol Evol. 1984;21(3):209–219. doi: 10.1007/BF02102355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohno S. Of palindromes and peptides. Hum Genet. 1992 Dec;90(4):342–345. doi: 10.1007/BF00220455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sugarman B. J., Dodgson J. B., Engel J. D. Genomic organization, DNA sequence, and expression of chicken embryonic histone genes. J Biol Chem. 1983 Jul 25;258(14):9005–9016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y. S., Brown D. T., Wellman S. E., Sittman D. B. Isolation and characterization of a mouse fully replication-dependent H1 gene within a genomic cluster of core histone genes. J Biol Chem. 1987 Dec 15;262(35):17118–17125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]