Abstract
We conducted a case-control study to investigate the association between interleukin (IL)-10-592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G polymorphisms and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. A hospital-based case-control study was taken in our study. A total of 172 patients with proven type 2 diabetes mellitus and 344 controls were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University between March 2012 and October 2014. Genotyping of IL-10 -592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G polymorphisms was done by done by PCR-RFLP methods. By the χ2 test, the distributions of the GG, GA and AA genotypes in IL-10 -1082A/G were significantly different between patients with diabetic nephropathy and control subjects (χ2 = 8.09, P = 0.02). By conditional logistic regression analysis, we found that the AA genotype of IL-10 -1082A/G was associated with an elevated risk of diabetic nephropathy compared to the GG genotype in codominant model, and the adjusted OR (95% CI) was 2.38 (1.23-4.57). In dominant model, the GA+AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetic nephropathy compared to the GG genotype in dominant model (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05-2.16). In recessive model, the AA genotype could influence the susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy when compared with the GG+GA in recessive model (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.12-3.85). In conclusion, we suggested that IL-10 -1082A/G gene polymorphism was correlated with development of diabetic nephropathy, but no association was observed between IL-10 -819T/C and -592A/C and risk of diabetic nephropathy.
Keywords: Diabetic nephropathy, IL-10 -1082A/G, IL-10 -819T/C, IL-10 -592A/C, polymorphism
Introduction
Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and high mortality in diabetic patients [1]. The etiology of diabetic nephropathy is not well understood, and the process of diabetic nephropathy is caused by many environmental factors, such as high blood pressure, high glomerular filtration rate, glycemic control and ethinicities [2]. However, not all of the individuals who expose to similar risk factors would suffer from diabetic nephropathy, which suggests that genetic factors have an important role in the susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy.
Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an immunoregulatory cytokine and is produced by Th2 cells, and this gene plays an important role in regulating T cells, and monocytes/macrophages. It is well known that the encoding gene of IL-10 is located on chromosome 1 (1q31-1q32), and is an anti-inflammatory cytokine, which could inhibit the synthesis of cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-1β, IL-1α, and TNF-α in activated macrophage and IFNγ by T cells [3]. Previous study has reported that increased concentration of circulating IL-10 was associated with the development of diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic nephropathy [4]. Another study has reported that alterations of IL-10 levels are associated with the extent of renal damage in diabetic nephropathy [5]. These studies suggest that IL-10 may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Three common SNPs are observed in IL-10 genes, including IL-10 -592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G. Previous studies have reported the IL-10 -592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G polymorphisms and development of diabetic nephropathy, but the results are inconclusive [6-8]. In our study, we conducted a case-control study to investigate the association between IL-10 -592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G polymorphisms and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy.
Materials and methods
Study subjects
A hospital-based case-control study was taken in our study. A total of one hundred and seventy two patients with proven type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University between March 2012 and October 2014. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was based on the WHO criteria in 1999 [9]. The nephropathy was diagnosed in diabetic patients according to proteinuria of at least 500 mg/24 h and glomerular filtration rates (GFR) of less than 25 ml/min.
Three hundred and forty four control subjects free of diabetes and nephropathy were collected from individuals who underwent a regular health examination at the examination center of our hospital during the same period of time. Two control subjects were age- and gender-matched with one patient. Control subjects who had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy were excluded from the present study.
A standardized questionnaire was used to investigate the demographic characteristics of patients with diabetic nephropathy and control subjects, including age, sex, diabetic duration and body mass index (BMI). The clinical data were collected from medical records, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, the levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and creatinine were determined. Signed informed consent forms were obtained from all the study subjects prior to their participation in the present study. The protocol of our study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University.
Genotyping
Each patient with diabetic nephropathy and control subject was asked to provide 5 ml blood sample, and the blood sample was collected in EDTA-containing tubes, and stored at -20°C until use. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood sample using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genotyping of IL-10 -592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G polymorphisms was done by done by PCR-RFLP methods. Probes and primers for IL-10 -592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G were designed by Sequenom Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom®) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR conditions were set as follows: 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 63°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. Quality control was ensured by blind genotyping of the 10% of the subject samples.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using statistical package SPSS 18.0 package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between patients with diabetic nephropathy and control subjects were analyzed by independent sample t-test and χ2 test. Association between IL-10 polymorphisms and risk of diabetic nephropathy were calculated by computing the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from logistic regression analyses. A P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Because of matching by age and gender, there was no statistical analysis difference between patients with diabetic nephropathy and control subjects in terms of age and gender (Table 1). By χ2 test, patients with diabetic nephropathy were more likely to be suffer from hypertension (χ2 = 35.96, P<0.001), have higher BMI (χ2 = 44.46, P<0.001), higher triglyceride (t = 61.87, P<0.001), total cholesterol (t = 50.90, P<0.001), high density lipoprotein (t = 19.81, P<0.001), low density lipoprotein (t = 17.49, P<0.001) and creatinine (t = 19.72, P<0.001) when compared with controls.
Table 1.
Variables | Patients | % | Controls | % | t test or χ2 test | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age, years | ||||||
<55 | 80 | 46.51 | 162 | 47.09 | ||
≥55 | 92 | 53.49 | 182 | 52.91 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
Gender | ||||||
Females | 108 | 62.79 | 216 | 62.79 | ||
Males | 64 | 37.21 | 128 | 37.21 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
BMI, kg/m2 | ||||||
<24 | 63 | 36.63 | 232 | 67.44 | ||
≥24 | 109 | 63.37 | 112 | 32.56 | 44.46 | <0.001 |
Hypertension | ||||||
Yes | 61 | 35.47 | 218 | 63.37 | ||
No | 111 | 64.53 | 126 | 36.63 | 35.96 | <0.001 |
Triglyceride | 1.79±0.07 | 1.42±0.05 | 61.87 | <0.001 | ||
Total cholesterol | 4.79±0.06 | 5.11±0.08 | 50.90 | <0.001 | ||
High density lipoprotein | 1.17±0.03 | 1.24±0.05 | 19.81 | <0.001 | ||
Low density lipoprotein | 3.12±0.07 | 3.24±0.08 | 17.49 | <0.001 | ||
Creatinine | 1.73±0.74 | 0.92±0.13 | 19.72 | <0.001 | ||
Duration of diabetes, years | 11.42±3.10 |
The genotype distributions of IL-10 -1082A/G, -819T/C, and -592A/C genes confirmed with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control subjects (Table 2), and the P values were 0.28, 0.38 and 0.32, respectively. By the χ2 test, the distributions of the GG, GA and AA genotypes in IL-10 -1082A/G were significantly different between patients with diabetic nephropathy and control subjects (χ2 = 8.09, P = 0.02). The minor allele frequency in controls was similar with the distributions in dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/).
Table 2.
SNP | Patients | % | Controls | % | P for HWE | χ2 value | P value | Minor allele frequency | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
In database | In controls | ||||||||
-1082A/G | |||||||||
GG | 66 | 38.37 | 163 | 47.38 | |||||
GA | 80 | 46.51 | 153 | 44.48 | |||||
AA | 26 | 15.12 | 27 | 7.85 | 0.28 | 8.09 | 0.02 | 0.2722 | 0.3009 |
-819T/C | |||||||||
TT | 57 | 33.14 | 127 | 36.92 | |||||
TC | 77 | 44.77 | 150 | 43.60 | |||||
CC | 38 | 22.09 | 67 | 19.48 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.4347 | 0.4128 |
-592A/C | |||||||||
AA | 67 | 38.95 | 132 | 38.37 | |||||
AC | 79 | 45.93 | 155 | 45.06 | |||||
CC | 26 | 15.12 | 57 | 16.57 | 0.32 | 1.18 | 0.55 | 0.4349 | 0.3910 |
By conditional logistic regression analysis, we found that the AA genotype of IL-10 -1082A/G was associated with an elevated risk of diabetic nephropathy compared to the GG genotype in codominant model, and the adjusted OR (95% CI) was 2.38 (1.23-4.57) (Table 3). In dominant model, the GA+AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetic nephropathy compared to the GG genotype in dominant model (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05-2.16). In recessive model, the AA genotype could influence the susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy when compared with the GG+GA in recessive model (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.12-3.85). However, we did not find that the IL-10 -819T/C and -592A/C could influence the development of diabetic nephropathy.
Table 3.
Model | IL-10 | Patients | % | Controls | % | OR (95% CI)1 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1082A/G | |||||||
Codominant | GG | 66 | 38.37 | 163 | 47.38 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
GA | 80 | 46.51 | 153 | 44.48 | 1.29 (0.85-1.95) | 0.2 | |
AA | 26 | 15.12 | 27 | 7.85 | 2.38 (1.23-4.57) | 0.05 | |
Dominant | GG | 66 | 38.37 | 163 | 47.38 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
GA+AA | 106 | 61.63 | 180 | 52.33 | 1.47 (1.05-2.16) | 0.04 | |
Recessive | GG+GA | 146 | 84.88 | 316 | 91.86 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
AA | 26 | 15.12 | 27 | 7.85 | 2.08 (1.12-3.85) | 0.01 | |
-819T/C | |||||||
Codominant | TT | 57 | 33.14 | 127 | 36.92 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
TC | 77 | 44.77 | 150 | 43.60 | 1.14 (0.74-1.77) | 0.53 | |
CC | 38 | 22.09 | 67 | 19.48 | 1.26 (0.74-2.16) | 0.36 | |
Dominant | TT | 57 | 33.14 | 127 | 36.92 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
TC+CC | 115 | 66.86 | 217 | 63.08 | 1.18 (0.79-1.77) | 0.40 | |
Recessive | TT+TC | 134 | 77.91 | 277 | 80.52 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
CC | 38 | 22.09 | 67 | 19.48 | 1.17 (0.73-1.87) | 0.49 | |
-592A/C | |||||||
Codominant | AA | 67 | 38.95 | 132 | 38.37 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
AC | 79 | 45.93 | 155 | 45.06 | 1.01 (0.66-1.53) | 0.98 | |
CC | 26 | 15.12 | 57 | 16.57 | 0.89 (0.50-1.61) | 0.7 | |
Dominant | AA | 67 | 38.95 | 132 | 38.37 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
AC+CC | 105 | 61.05 | 212 | 61.63 | 0.98 (0.66-1.45) | 0.9 | |
Recessive | AA+AC | 146 | 84.88 | 287 | 83.43 | 1.0 (Ref.) | - |
CC | 26 | 15.12 | 57 | 16.57 | 0.90 (0.52-1.52) | 0.67 |
Adjusted for age, gender, BMI, hypertension, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein and creatinine.
Discussion
It is reported that individuals could not develop the same type of diseases even when they expose to similar risk factors of diseases, and thus we could hypothesize that genetic variations may contribute to the development of diabetic nephropathy. We conducted a case-control study to investigate the association between IL-10 -1082A/G, -819T/C, and -592A/C gene polymorphisms and development of diabetic nephropathy, and we found that IL-10 -1082A/G gene polymorphism was associated with susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in codminant, dominant and recessive models.
Increasing evidences suggested that pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus was correlated with the presence of a chronic low-grade inflammatory state and the activation of the innate immune system [9]. Moreover, it is reported that inflammatory cytokines are involved in the development of microvascular diabetic complications, including diabetic nephropathy [11,12]. IL-10 was a candidate gene in the pathophysiologic mechanism of auto-immune/inflammatory disease, because it could regulate both cellular and humoral immunity. Previous study has suggested that the IL-10 elevated in the sera of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic nephropathy [5]. Thus, high expression of IL-10 might be associated with an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy.
Several previous studies have reported the association between IL-10 gene polymorphisms and development of diabetic nephropathy, but the results are inconsistent [6-8,13-16]. Babel et al. conducted a case-control study in German, and they reported that IL-10 -1082A/G may increase the risk of patients with type 2 diabetes or glomerulonephritis [14]. Another two studies in a Tunisian population, they reported that IL-10 -819T/C was associated with increased risk of diabetic nephropathy, but no association was found between IL-10 -1082A/G and development of diabetic nephropathy [6,15]. Another study also conducted in a Taiwanese population, and they found that IL-10 -592A/C may influence products of IL-10, and it is an indicator of nephropathy risk in Taiwanese type 2 diabetes mellitus [7]. Arababadi et al. found that IL-10 -592A/C polymorphism has an effect in the pathogenesis of diabetes with nephropathy [16]. Erdogan et al. conducted a study in a Turkish population, and they reported that IL-10 -1082A/G is not correlated with the development of diabetic nephropathy [8]. In our study, we found that IL-10 -1082A/G gene polymorphism was associated with susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy, but no association between IL-10 -819T/C, and -592A/C and risk of diabetic nephropathy. The conflicting results about the role of IL-10 -1082A/G, -819T/C, and -592A/C gene polymorphisms in diabetic nephropathy may be due to different ethnicities, sample size and study design.
Two limitations in our study should be taken into consideration. First, study subjects were selected from only one hospital, which would cause selection bias in our study. However, the genotype distributions of IL-10 -1082A/G, -819T/C, and -592A/C are in line with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls, which suggests that our population may represent the general population. Second, the sample size of our study is relatively small, which could reduce the statistical power to find differences between groups. Therefore, further studies with participants from multiple locations and a larger sample size are needed to confirm our results.
In conclusion, we suggest that IL-10 -1082A/G gene polymorphism is correlated with development of diabetic nephropathy, but no association was observed between IL-10 -819T/C and -592A/C and risk of diabetic nephropathy. Further large sample size and multicenter studies are greatly needed to confirm their association.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Dronavalli S, Duka I, Bakris GL. The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4:444–52. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rossing P, Hougaard P, Parving HH. Risk factors for development of incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients: a 10-year prospective observational study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:859–64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.5.859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.D’Andrea A, Aste-Amezaga M, Valiante NM, Ma X, Kubin M, Trinchieri G. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits human lymphocyte interferon gammaproduction by suppressing natural killer cell stimulatory factor/IL-12 synthesis in accessory cells. J Exp Med. 1993;178:1041–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.3.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Myśliwska J, Zorena K, Semetkowska-Jurkiewicz E, Rachoń D, Suchanek H, Myśliwski A. High levels of circulating interleukin-10 in diabetic nephropathy patients. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2005;16:117–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wong CK, Ho AW, Tong PC, Yeung CY, Kong AP, Lun SW, Chan JC, Lam CW. Aberrant activation profile of cytokines and mitogen-activated protein kinases in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;149:123–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03389.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ezzidi I, Mtiraoui N, Kacem M, Mallat SG, Mohamed MB, Chaieb M, Mahjoub T, Almawi WY. Interleukin-10-592C/A, -819C/T and -1082A/G promoter variants affect the susceptibility to nephropathy in Tunisian type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;70:401–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kung WJ, Lin CC, Liu SH, Chaung HC. Association of interleukin-10 polymorphisms with cytokines in type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:809–13. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Erdogan M, Cetinkalp S, Ozgen AG, Saygili F, Berdeli A, Yilmaz C. Interleukin-10 (-1082G/A) gene polymorphism in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without nephropathy. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16:91–4. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999. WHO Study Group Report of a WHO consultation. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pickup JC, Crook MA. Is type II diabetes mellitus a disease of the innate immune system? Diabetologia. 1998;41:1241–8. doi: 10.1007/s001250051058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Demircan N, Safran BG, Soylu M, Ozcan AA, Sizmaz S. Determination of vitreous interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) levels in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Eye (Lond) 2006;20:1366–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mora C, Navarro JF. The role of inflammation as a pathogenic factor in the development of renal disease in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2005;5:399–401. doi: 10.1007/s11892-005-0044-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu HC, Ling H, Na SP, Xie RJ. The research on the relationship between the polymorphism of 1082A/G, anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 gene promoter with its effect of preventing ESRD patients from microinflammation and arteriosclerosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005;85:2076–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Babel N, Gabdrakhmanova L, Hammer MH, Schoenemann C, Skrypnikov V, Poliak N, Volk HD, Reinke P. Predictive value of cytokine gene polymorphisms for the development of endstage renal disease. J Nephrol. 2006;19:802–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mtiraoui N, Ezzidi I, Kacem M, Ben Hadj Mohamed M, Chaieb M, Haj Jilani AB, Mahjoub T, Almawi WY. Predictive value of interleukin-10 promoter genotypes and haplotypes in determining the susceptibility to nephropathy in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:57–63. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arababadi MK, Reza Mirzaei M, Ali Sajadi SM, Hassanshahi G, Ahmadabadi BN, Salehabadi VA, Derakhshan R, Kennedy D. Interleukin (IL)-10 gene polymorphisms are associated with type 2 diabetes with and without nephropathy: a study of patients from the southeast region of Iran. Inflammation. 2012;35:797–802. doi: 10.1007/s10753-011-9376-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]