Erratum to: Int Urogynecol J
DOI 10.1007/s00192-014-2445-3
The version of Table 2 in the original publication was potentially misleading. The corrected table is presented here.
| Type of fistulaa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure causing iatrogenic fistula | Vesico-cervico-vaginal fistula | Vault fistula | Ureteric injury | Total (100 %) |
| Obstetric procedures | ||||
| Cesarean section | 324 (70.1 %) | 0 (0 %) | 138 (29.9 %) | 462 |
| Repair of ruptured uterus | 9 (36.0 %) | 0 (0 %) | 16 (64.0 %) | 25 |
| Hysterectomy for ruptured uterus | 16 (10.0 %) | 86 (54.1 %) | 57 (35.8 %) | 159 |
| Gynecological procedures | ||||
| Gynecological hysterectomy | 1 (0.6 %) | 95 (60.1 %) | 62 (39.2 %) | 158 |
| Other | 1 (100.0 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0 (0 %) | 1 |
| Total | 351 | 181 | 273 | 805 |
aVesico-cervico-vaginal fistulas and vault fistulas correspond to Waaldijk type I, and ureteric injury fistulas to Waaldijk type III
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s00192-014-2445-3.
Contributor Information
Thomas J. I. P. Raassen, Email: thomasraassen@gmail.com
Carrie J. Ngongo, Email: cngongo@gmail.com