Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1981 Jun;36(6):452–455. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.6.452

Exponential analysis of lobar pressure-volume characteristics.

N Berend, C Skoog, W M Thurlbeck
PMCID: PMC471532  PMID: 7314015

Abstract

In 19 excised left human lungs, seven of which were emphysema-free, lobar pressure-volume (P-V) characteristics were analysed by fitting to the P-V data an exponential of the form V=A-Be-KPL (where V is the volume at a transpulmonary pressure (PL), A is the theoretical lung volume at infinite PL, B is the difference between A and the intercept of the fitted exponential on the volume axis and K is a shape constant). In the emphysema-free lungs there was no difference in the B/A ratio expressed as a percentage, indicating an identical position of the P-V curves of the upper and lower lobes. However the upper lobes had significantly (p less than 0.025) higher values for K than the lower lobes indicating greater compliance. In 10 emphysematous lungs the upper lobes were more severely involved than the lower lobes. In these lungs the difference in K between upper and lower lobes had been abolished suggesting that the less emphysematous lower lobes had increased compliance relatively more than the upper lobes.

Full text

PDF
452

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berend N., Skoog C., Thurlbeck W. M. Lobar pressure-volume characteristics of excised human lungs. Thorax. 1981 Apr;36(4):290–295. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.4.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colebatch H. J., Ng C. K., Nikov N. Use of an exponential function for elastic recoil. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Feb;46(2):387–393. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.2.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. D'Angelo E. Local alveolar size and transpulmonary pressure in situ and in isolated lungs. Respir Physiol. 1972 Apr;14(3):251–266. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(72)90032-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FRANK N. R. A comparison of static volume-pressure relations of excised pulmonary lobes of dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1963 Mar;18:274–278. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1963.18.2.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faridy E. E., Kidd R., Milic-Emili J. Topographical distribution of inspired gas in excised lobes of dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Apr;22(4):760–766. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.22.4.760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson G. J., Pride N. B., Davis J., Schroter R. C. Exponential description of the static pressure-volume curve of normal and diseased lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Oct;120(4):799–811. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.120.4.799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Glaister D. H., Schroter R. C., Sudlow M. F., Milic-Emili J. Bulk elastic properties of excised lungs and the effect of a transpulmonary pressure gradient. Respir Physiol. 1973 Apr;17(3):347–364. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(73)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greaves I. A., Colebatch H. J. Elastic behavior and structure of normal and emphysematous lungs post mortem. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Jan;121(1):127–136. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hogg J. C., Nepszy S. J., Macklem P. T., Thurlbeck W. M. Elastic properties of the centrilobular emphysematous space. J Clin Invest. 1969 Jul;48(7):1306–1312. doi: 10.1172/JCI106097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pare P. D., Boucher R., Michoud M. C., Hogg J. C. Static lung mechanics of intact and excised rhesus monkey lungs and lobes. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Apr;44(4):547–552. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.4.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Silvers G. W., Petty T. L., Stanford R. E., Filley G. F. The elastic properties of lobes of excised human lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Jul;120(1):207–209. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.120.1.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thurlbeck W. M. Aspects of chronic airflow obstruction. Chest. 1977 Sep;72(3):341–349. doi: 10.1378/chest.72.3.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thurlbeck W. M., Dunnill M. S., Hartung W., Heard B. E., Heppleston A. G., Ryder R. C. A comparison of three methods of measuring emphysema. Hum Pathol. 1970 Jun;1(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(70)80035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES