Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(0):922–925. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30448-x

On the Frontline: Pediatric Obesity in the Emergency Department

Heather M Prendergast 1, Matthew Close 1, Brett Jones 1, Nicholas Furtado 1, E Bradshaw Bunney 1, Mark Mackey 1, Diego Marquez 1, Marcia Edison 1
PMCID: PMC4715877  NIHMSID: NIHMS750194  PMID: 22364061

Abstract

Obesity among children is rising at an alarming rate. This study examines pediatric emergency department visits for children aged 2 to 17 years to determine the prevalence of normal, overweight, and obesity as well as to characterize discharge diagnosis and level of service among the different groups. The electronic emergency department medical record and billing service data were used in the review process. Body mass index (BMI) and percentiles were calculated using the Centers for Disease Control formulas with overweight being defined as BMI between 85th and 94th sex- and age-specific percentiles and obesity as greater than 95th sex- and age-specific percentile. The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board. Of the 596 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there was a predominance of African American and Hispanic patients. Approximately 53% (313) of patients were classified as normal weight, while 46% (272) of patients were either overweight or obese. The percentages of overweight and obesity were similar across racial/ethnic classifications, with a slight predominance of obesity among minority groups (30% and 35%, respectively, in minority groups vs 28% and 25%, respectively, in nonminority groups). There were no statistically significant differences between discharge diagnosis and level of service among the different weight categories. Rates of overweight and obesity in this predominately minority pediatric population were significantly greater than the published national rates. The impact of the epidemic of childhood obesity mandates the need for innovative strategies of weight control and reduction. Emergency departments routinely treat high-risk pediatric populations and can therefore serve as a resource for screening and early referral that has been previously untapped in combating childhood obesity.

Keywords: children/adolescents, obesity, body weight, emergency department, minority health

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric Obesity

Obesity is a major public health concern. Obesity amongst children is rising at an alarming rate. Data from the most recent National Health and Nutrition Examination survey (NHANES), 2007–2008, indicate that, of children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years, 11.9% and 16.9% were at or above the 97th and 95th percentiles, respectively, of the 2000 body mass index (BMI) for age growth charts.1

Childhood obesity is associated with significant health problems affecting cardiovascular system (hyper-cholesterolemia, and dyslipidemia), the endocrine system (impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes), and mental health (depression and low self-esteem).2 Most importantly, overweight and obese children are at risk for adult obesity with its associated morbidity and mortality.3

A policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics indicates that anticipatory guidance and/or treatment intervention before obesity becomes severe has a higher likelihood for success.4 The scope of the childhood obesity epidemic has been well documented in both community and outpatient settings, thus establishing a framework for future interventions.5 Although the emergency department (ED) serves as a common entry point for many pediatric patients, the epidemic of pediatric obesity has not been well documented in this setting.

Statement of the Problem

The purpose of this research was to study ED visits for children aged 2 to 17 years and determine the prevalence of normal, overweight, and obesity in this population, and to characterize discharge diagnosis and billing levels of service among the different groups. More specifically, answers to the following questions were sought:

  • How do the prevalence rates of obesity in a predominately minority pediatric ED population compare with national averages?

  • Is there a difference between the discharge diagnosis of overweight and obese children as compared to normal-weight children?

  • Do overweight and obese children require more resources or incur more costs during their ED visit?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data Collection

A single-center, retrospective chart review was conducted on a convenience sample of 893 pediatric ED visits from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2008. All pediatric patients evaluated in the ED during the study time frame were eligible for inclusion in the study. Approximately 50 pediatric visits during the first week of each month and 25 visits during the last week of each month were randomly selected using a random number generator and manually reviewed. Pediatric patients less than 2 years of age were excluded from final data analysis because BMI is not considered a valid measure of adiposity below this age. Five hundred eighty-nine pediatric ED visits were eligible for study after exclusion criteria were applied. The data were entered in an electronic database. The study was reviewed and approved by the University of Illinois institutional review board.

Data collected from the electronic medical record included demographics, height and weight measurements, discharge diagnosis, and triage level. Height and weight measurements were physically obtained by the triage nurse. Estimates by the patient or a family member were not used. Data collected from the ED billing provider included billing level of service for each patient encounter. BMI and percentiles were calculated using the Centers for Disease Control formulas, with overweight being defined as BMI between 85th and 94th sex- and age-specific percentiles and obesity as greater than 95th sex- and age-specific percentiles.6

Setting

The ED is located in a tertiary care, academic institution in a largely African American and Hispanic neighborhood. The ED serves both pediatric and adults patients with an annual pediatric volume of 8500. The ED is staffed by board-prepared and board-certified emergency medicine physicians with residents from emergency medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics.

Statistical Analysis

Clinical characteristics and race/ethnicity were compared using χ2 test/Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. For all tests performed, percentages were reported and p value < .05 was considered significant. SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 893 pediatric ED patient records were reviewed. Two hundred ninety-seven (33%) patients were aged less than 2 years and were excluded from final analysis. In addition, there were 7 patients with incomplete data, leaving a total of 589 pediatric patients for the study population. Only the initial ED visit was included for those patients with multiple ED encounters. The majority of the patients were African American and Hispanic. Asians, American Indians, and Native Americans represented 2% of the study population (Table 1). There were nearly equal proportions of males and females (53% vs 46%).

Table 1.

Demographics of Pediatric Study Population

Race No. %
African American 343 58
Caucasian 20 3
Hispanic 214 36
Other (Asian, Native American, American Indian) 12 2

Fifty-three percent (n = 313) of patients were classified as normal based on the BMI calculation. Forty-six percent (n = 272) of patients were classified as overweight or obese. Specifically, 17% (n = 99) were overweight and 29% (n = 173) were obese. The percentages of overweight and obesity were similar across gender lines. Fewer than 1% (n = 4) of patients were classified as underweight and therefore excluded from data analysis.

When testing the association between ethnicity and BMI classification, there was no significant difference on the distribution of race among normal, overweight, and obese groups (p = .93) using Fisher exact test (Table 2).

Table 2.

Ethnicity and Body Mass Index Classificationa

Variables %

Ethnicity Normal Weight
(n = 313)
Overweight
(n = 99)
Obese
(n = 173)
African American 52% 18% 30%
Caucasian 57% 15% 28%
Hispanic 45% 20% 35%
Other 58% 17% 25%
a

Testing the association between ethnicity and body mass index classification (p = .93) using Fisher exact test.

When testing the association between discharge diagnosis and BMI classification, there was no statistically significant discharge diagnosis distributed differently among normal, overweight, and obese groups (p = .22) using χ2 test (Table 3). The top 3 discharge diagnoses among the 3 BMI classifications were as follows: (1) obese: cardiovascular (56%, n = 96), infectious disease (41%, n = 71), genitourinary (35%, n = 60); (2) overweight: endocrine (40%, n = 40), neurologic (32%, n = 32), gastrointestinal (24%, n = 24); (3) normal weight: general (66%, n = 207), respiratory (63%, n = 197), dental (62%, n = 194).

Table 3.

Discharge Diagnosis and Body Mass Index Classificationa,b

Variable %

Discharge Diagnosis Normal-Weight Group
(N = 313)
Overweight Group
(N = 99)
Obese Group
(N = 172)
Cardiovascular 33% 11% 56%
Dermatology 53% 13% 33%
Endocrine 60% 40% 0%
Dental 63% 13% 25%
General 67% 0% 33%
Gastrointestinal 58% 24% 18%
Genitourinary 43% 22% 35%
Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat 55% 14% 31%
Infectious disease 47% 12% 41%
Musculoskeletal 44% 23% 33%
Neurologic 50% 32% 18%
Psychiatric 46% 23% 31%
Respiratory 63% 9% 28%
a

Testing the association between discharge diagnosis and body mass Index classification (p = .22) using χ2 test.

b

The rows equal 100% but the columns do not because multiple diagnoses may be assigned to 1 visit.

When testing the association between billing level of service and BMI classification, there was no statistically significant difference between overweight/obese and normal-weight children (Table 4). The majority of pediatric ED visits were level 3 (83%, n = 491), which is consistent with national averages for ED pediatric visits.7

Table 4.

Billing Level of Service and Body Mass Index Classificationa

%

Level of Service Normal-Weight Group
(N = 317)
Overweight Group
(N = 99)
Obese Group
(N = 173)
Billing level I and II 46% 22% 32%
Billing level III 55% 17% 29%
Billing level IV and critical care 52% 14% 34%
a

Testing the association between billing level of service and body mas index classification (p = .77) using χ2 test.

DISCUSSION

This study found that the rates of overweight and obesity in this predominately minority pediatric population were significantly greater than the published national rates for the general pediatric population. Recent numbers from the Centers for Disease Control (2008) found that 16.9% of children aged 2 to 17 years were obese.8 This study found a prevalence rate that was nearly double the national average, 29%. Interestingly, there was no association between ethnicity and BMI classification. This is significant because it demonstrates a need for intervention that is not limited by ethnicity or gender.

In addition, while there were no statistically significant differences in discharge diagnoses among the different BMI classifications, there were greater percentages of cardiovascular- and endocrine-related diagnoses (56% and 40%, respectively) in obese and overweight children, respectively. Obesity is associated with many well-recognized medical conditions.9,12 The incidence of type 2 diabetes being diagnosed within the pediatric population is increasing and parallels the increased prevalence of pediatric obesity.2 This study found endocrine-related complaints to be the most frequent complaint among the overweight children.

Finally, there were no statistically significant differences among billing level of service for normal-weight, overweight, and obese pediatric patients. Consistent with this study’s findings (majority of ED visits level 3), a recent report found that the majority of EDs visits by children were for various nonemergent or primary care-treatable diagnoses, therefore providing a window for screening.10,11,13

As the prevalence of pediatric obesity continues to increase, interventional efforts have traditionally been limited to outpatient areas despite an increasing presence of high-risk patients in other health care settings, such as EDs.5,6

In 2005, the US Preventive Services Task Force released guidelines for screening and interventions for childhood obesity. Central to the strategy is the call for collaboration between the various medical and public health communities. EDs have been shown to be an integral component of the health care system by serving as connectors between acute care and preventive/outpatient management.

Study Limitations

This study is a retrospective review conducted at a single academic ED. To confirm and generalize the results, a multicenter review is needed. Nonetheless, this study found rates consistent with high-risk populations and confirms the magnitude of the childhood obesity epidemic.

CONCLUSION

The ongoing epidemic of childhood obesity has placed an unprecedented burden on pediatric health and will impact future health care costs, thus mandating the need for innovative strategies aimed at maximizing positive outcomes. EDs will continue to serve as important sources of emergent and nonemergent pediatric care in the United States and routinely treat at-risk/high-risk pediatric populations. They can therefore serve as an important and previously untapped resource for screening and early referral for childhood obesity.

Acknowledgments

Funding/Support: The statistical analysis was supported by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science award UL1RR029879 from the National Center for Research Resources.

Footnotes

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curlin LR, et al. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:242–249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.D'Adamo E, Santoro N, Caprio S. Metabolic syndrome in pediatrics: old concepts revised, new concepts discussed. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2009;38:549–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pietrobelli A, Espinoza MC, Cristofaro PD. Childhood obesity: looking into the future. Angiology. 2008;59(suppl 2):S30–S33. doi: 10.1177/0003319708318788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davis M, Gance-Cleveland B, Hassink S, et al. Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2007;(120 suppl):S229–S253. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Epstein LH, Wrotniak BH. Future directions for pediatric obesity treatment. Obesity. 2010;18(suppl 1):S8–S12. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.CDC BMI Formula. [Accessed August 1, 2010]; www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/childrens_bmi/tool_for_schools.html.
  • 7.Hampl SE, Carroll CA, Simon SD, et al. Resource utilization and expenditures for overweight and obese children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:11–14. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hollar D, Messiah SE, Lopez-Mitnik G, et al. Healthier options for public schoolchildren program improves weight and blood pressure in 6- to 13-year-olds. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Merrill CT, Owens PL, Stocks C. HCUP Statistical Brief #52. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. May, [Accessed August 1, 2010]. Pediatric Emergency Department Visits in Community Hospitals from Selected States, 2005. www.hcu-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb52.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ogden C, Carroll M. Prevalence of Obesity Among Children & Adolscents: United States, Irends 1963–1965 Through 2007–2008. [Accessed October 22, 2010];Centers for Disease Control. NCHS Health E-Stat. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity_child_07_08/obesity_child_07_08.htm.
  • 11.Cali AM, Caprio S. Obesity in children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(suppl 1):S31–S36. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Biltoft CA, Muir A. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: a clinician's guide. Adolesc Med Sate Art Rev. 2009;20:109–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ben-Isaac E, Schrager SM, Keefer M, et al. National profile of nonemergent pediatric emergency department visits. Pediatrics. 2010;125:454–459. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES