Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Top Curr Chem. 2016;372:85–101. doi: 10.1007/128_2015_651

Asymmetric Iridium Catalyzed C-C Coupling of Chiral Diols via Site-Selective Redox-Triggered Carbonyl Addition

Inji Shin 1, Michael J Krische 1
PMCID: PMC4716893  NIHMSID: NIHMS744641  PMID: 26187028

Abstract

Cyclometalated π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complexes modified by axially chiral chelating phosphine ligands display a pronounced kinetic preference for primary alcohol dehydrogenation, enabling highly site-selective redox-triggered carbonyl additions of chiral primary-secondary 1,3-diols with exceptional levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity. Unlike conventional methods for carbonyl allylation, the present redox-triggered alcohol C-H functionalizations bypass the use of protecting groups, premetalated reagents, and discrete alcohol-to-aldehyde redox reactions.

Keywords: iridium, allylation, dehydrogenation, transfer hydrogenation, diastereoselectivity, enantioselectivity, green chemistry, polyketides

1. Introduction

As stated by Hendrickson, “The ideal synthesis creates a complex skeleton… in a sequence only of successive construction reactions involving no intermediary refunctionalizations, and leading directly to the structure of the target, not only its skeleton but also its correctly placed functionality.” [1]. This perspective elegantly captures many core aspects of synthetic efficiency, including the importance of merged redox-construction events (“redox-economy”) [2], regio-, chemo- and stereoselectivity [3, 4], as well as protecting group-free chemical synthesis [5, 6, 7]. A modernistic revision of this statement also would encompass considerations of atom-efficiency [8,9] and waste generation [10, 11, 12], overall process relevance [13, 14, 15, 16], and the minimization of preactivation: the degree of separation between reagent and feedstock [17]. Considerable progress toward these ideals has been made, especially in terms of controlling regio- and stereoselectivity. Indeed, 40 years have elapsed since the first industrial catalytic asymmetric synthesis was reported by Monsanto for the synthesis of L-DOPA, which utilizes a byproduct-free enantioselective hydrogenation [18, 19]. The design of chemoselective catalysts capable of discriminating between like functional groups, so as to transform organic molecules in a “site-selective” manner, poses a more formidable challenge, but offers the benefit of removing steps from a synthetic route otherwise required for the installation and removal of protecting groups. As demonstrated in the work of Kawabata [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ], Miller [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], and Taylor [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41], the site-selective modification of carbohydrates and other natural polyols directly delivers compounds that would normally require lengthy stepwise preparations, or may be entirely inaccessible by other means.

By exploiting the native reducing ability of alcohols, we have developed a broad, new family of redox-triggered carbonyl additions where hydrogen transfer from alcohols to π-unsaturated reactants results in the formation of electrophile-nucleophile pairs, which combine to give products of formal alcohol C-H functionalization [42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. These processes are redox-efficient as they merge alcohol oxidation and C-C bond construction events, bypassing discrete alcohol-to-aldehyde redox reactions, as well as manipulations required for the stoichiometric formation of premetalated reagents. One of the most useful processes based on this pattern of reactivity is the enantioselective iridium catalyzed coupling of primary alcohols with allyl acetate to form secondary homoallylic alcohols (Scheme 1) [49, 50, 51, 52, 53]. Such primary alcohol C-allylations have been applied to the syntheses of diverse polyketide natural products, resulting in the most concise routes reported, to date [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64].

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Iridium catalyzed coupling of primary alcohols with allyl acetate to form secondary homoallylic alcohols.

As documented in the review literature [65], iridium catalysts are remarkably sensitive to the steric environment of reactants and, in the context of diol oxidation, display a pronounced kinetic preference for dehydrogenation of the more accessible alcohol [66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74]. As illustrated in the context of oxidative lactonization, nearly complete levels of discrimination between two primary alcohols are achieved on the basis of remote steric effects: beta- versus gamma-branching (Scheme 2, eq. 1) [71]. In the case of benzylic diols, the energetic barrier to dehydrogenation should be lower, potentially diminishing selectivity in the dehydrogenation event. Yet as illustrated in the oxidative lactonization of the enantiomerically enriched 1,4-diol, oxidation at the primary benzylic alcohol occurs with complete levels of selectivity even though it is more endothermic than oxidation of the secondary benzylic alcohol (Scheme 2, eq. 2) [73].

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Examples of site-selective diol oxidation involving discrimination between two primary alcohols (eq. 1) and discrimination between benzylic primary versus secondary alcohols (eq. 2).

The exceptional levels of chemoselectivity displayed in iridium catalyzed diol oxidation led us to explore the feasibility of redox-triggered diol C-allylations that are both asymmetric and site-selective [75, 76]. Such transformations would represent a significant departure from classical protocols for carbonyl allylation [77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83], as they would forego the requirement of protecting groups, premetalated reagents, chiral auxiliaries and discrete alcohol-to-aldehyde oxidation, thus representing an additional step toward fulfillment of the “Hendricksonian ideal.” In this review, we summarize our progress on chiral diol C-H functionalization via asymmetric redox-triggered carbonyl addition.

2. Redox-Triggered Allylation of Diols

The redox-triggered carbonyl allylations developed in our laboratory are catalyzed by cyclometalated π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complexes bearing chiral phosphine ligands. These reactions proceed in accordance with the indicated general catalytic mechanism (Scheme 3). Entry into the catalytic cycles occurs upon protonolytic cleavage of the π-allyliridium complex by the primary alcohol reactant. The resulting iridium alkoxide suffers β-hydride elimination to furnish an aldehyde and an iridium hydride. Competition experiments demonstrate rapid and reversible β-hydride elimination, that is, alcohol hydrogenation-dehydrogenation, in advance of carbonyl addition [50]. Deprotonation of the iridium hydride provides an anionic iridium(I) intermediate, which undergoes oxidative addition with allyl acetate to regenerate the starting π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complex. Now, with aldehyde present, carbonyl addition occurs, resulting in the formation of a homoallylic iridium alkoxide that exchanges with the primary alcohol reactant to close the catalytic cycle. Use of isotopically labeled allyl acetate with deuterium at the allylic position, intervention of symmetric iridium π-allyl intermediate was corroborated [50]. Interestingly, both catalytic efficiency and stereoselectivity is dramatically influenced by remote substituents at the 4-position of the C,O-benzoate moiety. As suggested by single crystal X-ray diffraction data of a series of π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complexes (Scheme 3) [53], more electron deficient C,O-benzoate ligands enhance Lewis acidity at iridium, which may accelerate turnover limiting carbonyl addition with respect to protonolytic cleavage of the π-allyl and other competing processes.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

General catalytic mechanism for redox-triggered carbonyl allylation and survey of selected bond lengths from a series of π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complexes.

Our initial studies focused on the catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selective allylation of chiral 1,3-diols 1a1c. The feasibility of these processes was rendered uncertain by the well-documented instability of the β-hydroxy aldehyde intermediates, which under equilibrium conditions exist predominantly as dimers [84, 85, 86]. Nevertheless, the chromatographically isolated π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complex derived from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, (S)- or (R)-SEGPHOS, 4-cyano-3-nitro-benzoic acid and allyl acetate proved to be effective in these transformations (Scheme 4) [75]. Specifically, in aqueous THF solvent at 100 °C, 1,3-diols 1a1c (100 mol%) were exposed to the (S)- or (R)-SEGPHOS modified catalyst (5 mol%), allyl acetate (200 mol%), cesium carbonate (100 mol%), and 4-cyano-3-nitro-benzoic acid (10 mol%) to furnish diastereomers 2a2c and 3a3c, respectively. In each case, the homoallylic alcohols were obtained in good to excellent yields with high levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity. Oxidation of the unprotected secondary alcohol of the reaction products 2a2c and 3a3c (or reactants 1a1c) was not observed. Notably, the synthesis of 3b, which is accomplished in four steps through iterative redox-triggered allylation, was previously achieved through a 7-step sequence from the same starting material [87], illustrating the inherent step-economy of protecting group-free chemical synthesis.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in the asymmetric C-allylation of unprotected 1,3-diols 1a-1c.

To further assess scope and determine whether a 1,3-relationship between hydroxyl moieties is required to suppress over-oxidation, the 1,5-diol 1d and 1,5-triol 1e were exposed to the chromatographically isolated π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate modified by (S)- or (R)-SEGPHOS and 4-cyano-3-nitro-benzoic acid under the aforesaid conditions (Scheme 5) [75]. The corresponding homoallylic alcohols 2d, 2e and 3d, 3e were obtained in good to excellent yields with high levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity. The site-selective C-C coupling of 1e to form either 2e or 3e, where one of three unprotected alcohols undergoes modification, suggest this technology will be applicable to the late stage modification of even more complex polyhydroxylated compounds, such as type I polyketides.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in the asymmetric C-allylation of unprotected 1,5-diol 1d and 1,5-triol 1e.

The unprotected chiral β,γ-stereogenic alcohols 1f and 1g represent an especially challenging class of reactant, as branching adjacent to the transient chiral aldehyde is anticipated to retard the rate of carbonyl addition with respect to racemization (Scheme 6). For 1f and 1g, the chromatographically isolated π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complex derived from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, (S)- or (R)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP, 3,4-dinitro-benzoic acid and allyl acetate provided the best results [75]. While site-selectivity proved uniformly high, good levels of diastereocontrol were observed only in cases where the diastereofacial bias of the catalyst matched the intrinsic diastereofacial bias of the transient aldehydes for Felkin-Anh addition [88], as in the formation of 2f and 2g. In the mismatched case, represented by the formation of 3f and 3g, epimerization of the transient aldehydes erodes diastereoselectivity.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in the asymmetric C-allylation of unprotected chiral β,γ-stereogenic diols 1f and 1g.

While use of an isolable, single component catalyst offers certain advantages, generation of the catalyst in situ from commercial precursors is expedient and enables rapid evaluation of structurally diverse complexes. Using the commercially available malic acid derived diol 1h, a screening of catalysts generated in situ quickly led to the identification of the π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complex derived from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, (S)- or (R)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP, 4-chloro-3-nitro-benzoic acid and allyl acetate as a highly efficient and selective system for diol C-allylation [76]. Under these conditions, diol 1h is converted to the homoallylic alcohol 2h in 79% isolated yield as a single diastereomer, as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture (Scheme 7).

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Generation of structurally diverse catalysts in situ enables screening and identification of a highly efficient and selective system for C-allylation of unprotected diol 1h.

These conditions for in situ generation of the enantiomeric catalysts (S)- or (R)-Ir-Id were applied to chiral 1,3-diols 1h1j (Scheme 8) [76]. The respective diastereomeric products of C-allylation 2h2j and 3h3j were generated in good isolated yields with complete levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity and high levels of site-selectivity. The catalytic C-C coupling of the benzylic diol 1j is especially noteworthy, as dehydrogenation to form the acetophenone should be far less endothermic than aldehyde formation, yet only trace quantities of the over-oxidized ketone product were observed. Notably, the diastereoselectivities observed in connection with the protocol for in situ catalyst generation were consistently better than those observed previously using the chromatographically purified catalysts [75, 76].

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in the asymmetric C-allylation of unprotected 1,3-diols 1h1j using in situ generation of catalyst.

Having established the feasibility of diastereo- and site-selectivity in redox-triggered allylations of unprotected diols, we have begun to explore site-selectivity in related catalytic asymmetric C-C couplings. For example, using the chromatographically purified π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complex derived from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, (S)- or (R)-Tol-BINAP, 4-cyano-3-nitro-benzoic acid and allyl acetate, primary alcohols react with isoprene oxide to form aldehyde-allyliridium pairs en route to products of tert-(hydroxy)-prenylation [89]. To evaluate the feasibility of site-selective coupling, the unprotected malic acid derived diol 1h was reacted with isoprene oxide using enantiomeric Tol-BINAP modified iridium catalysts. The diastereomeric products of tert-(hydroxy)-prenylation 4h and 5h were formed with excellent levels of diastereo- and site-selectivity. A remarkable feature of this transformation resides in the ability to form an all-carbon quaternary center with control of relative and absolute stereochemistry (Scheme 9).

Scheme 9.

Scheme 9

Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in the asymmetric tert-(hydroxy)-prenylation of unprotected diol 1h.

More recently, related redox-triggered C-C couplings of primary alcohols and vinyl aziridines were developed, which furnish products of carbonyl (α-aminomethyl)allylation [90]. This transformation was applied to the unprotected 1,3-diols 1h, 1i and 1k using the enantiomeric cyclometalated iridium C,O-benzoate catalysts derived from 4-cyano-3-nitro-benzoic acid and either Cl,MeO-BIPHEP or BINAP (Scheme 10). The respective diastereomeric products of C-allylation 6h, 6i and 6k and 7h, 7i and 7k were generated in good isolated yields with good levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity and site-selectivity. As illustrated in the conversion of diol 1k to adducts 6k and 7k, the iridium catalyst is tolerant of Lewis basic pyridyl-substituents. To illustrate the utility of this methodology, the diol coupling products 6h, 6i and 6k and 7h, 7i and 7k were exposed to Mitsunobu reaction conditions, directly providing the diastereomeric trisubstituted piperidines 8h, 8i and 8k and 9h, 9i and 9k, respectively (Scheme 11).

Scheme 10.

Scheme 10

Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in the asymmetric C-(α-aminomethyl)allylation of unprotected 1,3-diols 1h, 1i and 1k using in situ generation of catalyst.

Scheme 11.

Scheme 11

Direct conversion of 6h, 6i and 6k and 7h, 7i and 7k to trisubstituted piperidines 8h, 8i and 8k and 9h, 9i and 9k, respectively.

3. Summary and Outlook

Stereo- and site-selective methods for the assembly of organic molecules that occur with addition, acceptorless removal or redistribution of hydrogen are natural endpoints in the evolution of methods for process-relevant chemical synthesis. Toward this objective, we have merged the chemistry of transfer hydrogenation and carbonyl addition by harnessing the native reducing ability of alcohols for the redox-triggered generation of transient organometal-aldehyde pairs. Using chiral cyclometalated π-allyliridium C,O-benzoate complexes, primary alcohols dehydrogenate faster than secondary alcohols, enabling site-selective modification of chiral 1,3-diols with exceptional levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity. This and related technologies for the direct, stereo- and site-selective C-C coupling of polyols streamlines de novo chemical synthesis, and offers new possibilities for late-stage modification of natural products, such as type I polyketides.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment is made to the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-0038) and the NIHNIGMS (RO1 GM093905) for partial financial support.

4. References

  • 1.Hendrickson JB. Systematic synthesis design. IV. Numerical codification of construction reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 1975;97:5784–5800. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burns NZ, Baran PS, Hoffmann RW. Redox economy in organic synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:2854–2867. doi: 10.1002/anie.200806086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trost BM. Selectivity: a key to synthetic efficiency. Science. 1983;219:245–250. doi: 10.1126/science.219.4582.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Newhouse T, Baran PS, Hoffmann RW. The economies of synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:3010–3021. doi: 10.1039/b821200g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoffmann RW. Protecting-group-free synthesis. Synthesis. 2006:3531–3541. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Young IS, Baran PS. Protecting-group-free synthesis as an opportunity for invention. Nature Chem. 2009;1:193–205. doi: 10.1038/nchem.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roulland E. Protecting-group-free total syntheses: a challenging approach. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:1226–1227. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trost BM. The atom economy–a search for synthetic efficiency. Science. 1991;254:1471–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.1962206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Trost BM. Atom economy–a challenge for organic synthesis: homogeneous catalysis leads the way. Angew Chem Int Ed English. 1995;34:259–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sheldon RA. Catalysis and pollution prevention. Chem Ind. 1997:12–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheldon RA. The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chem. 2007;9:1273–1283. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sheldon RA. Fundamentals of green chemistry: efficiency in reaction design. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:1437–1451. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15219j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Butters M, Catterick D, Craig A, Curzons A, Dale D, Gillmore A, Green SP, Marziano I, Sherlock J-P, White W. Critical assessment of pharmaceutical processes–a rationale for changing the synthetic route. Chem Rev. 2006;106:3002–3027. doi: 10.1021/cr050982w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carey JS, Laffan D, Thomson C, Williams MT. Analysis of the reactions used for the preparation of drug candidate molecules. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:2337–2347. doi: 10.1039/b602413k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Busacca CA, Fandrick DR, Song JJ, Senanayake CH. The growing impact of catalysis in the pharmaceutical industry. Adv Synth Catal. 2011;353:1825–1864. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunn PJ. The importance of green chemistry in process research and development. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:1452–1461. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15041c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han SB, Kim IS, Krische MJ. Enantioselective iridium-catalyzed carbonyl allylation from the alcohol oxidation level via transfer hydrogenation: minimizing pre-activation for synthetic efficiency. Chem Commun. 2009:7278–7287. doi: 10.1039/b917243m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knowles WS. Asymmetric hydrogenation. Acc Chem Res. 1983;16:106–112. doi: 10.1021/ar7000809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Knowles WS. Asymmetric hydrogenations (Nobel Lecture) Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:1998–2007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kawabata T, Muramatsu W, Nishio T, Shibata T, Schedel H. A catalytic one-step process for the chemo- and regioselective acylation of monosaccharides. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12890–12895. doi: 10.1021/ja074882e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Muramatsu W, Kawabata T. Regioselective acylation of 6-O-protected octyl β-d-glucopyranosides by DMAP catalysis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:5031–5033. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kawabata T, Muramatsu W, Nishio T, Shibata T, Uruno Y, Stragies R. Regioselective acylation of octyl β-d-glucopyranoside by chiral 4-pyrrolidinopyridine analogues. Synthesis. 2008:747–753. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ueda Y, Muramatsu W, Mishiro K, Furuta T, Kawabata T. Functional group tolerance in organocatalytic regioselective acylation of carbohyrates. J Org Chem. 2009;74:8802–8805. doi: 10.1021/jo901569v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yoshida K, Furuta T, Kawabata T. Perfectly regioselective acylation of a cardiac glycoside, digitoxin, via catalytic amplification of the intrinsic reactivity. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:4830–4832. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Muramatsu W, Mishiro K, Ueda Y, Furuta T, Kawabata T. Perfectly regioselective and sequential protection of glucopyranosides. Eur J Org Chem. 2010:827–831. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ueda Y, Mishiro K, Yoshida K, Furuta T, Kawabata T. Regioselective diversification of a cardiac glycoside, lanatoside C, by organocatalysis. J Org Chem. 2012;77:7850–7857. doi: 10.1021/jo301007x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Griswold KS, Miller SJ. A peptide-based catalyst approach to regioselective functionalization of carbohydrates. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:8869–8875. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lewis CA, Sculimbrene BR, Xu Y, Miller SJ. Desymmetrization of glycerol derivatives with peptide-based acylation catalysts. Org Lett. 2005;7:3021–3023. doi: 10.1021/ol051061a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lewis CA, Miller SJ. Site-selective derivatization and remodeling of erythromycin A by using simple peptide-based chiral catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:5616–5619. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lewis CA, Merkel J, Miller SJ. Catalytic site-selective synthesis and evaluation of a series of erythromycin analogs. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:6007–6011. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lewis CA, Longcore KE, Miller SJ, Wender PA. An approach to the site-selective diversification of apoptolidin A with peptide-based catalysts. J Nat Prod. 2009;72:1864–1869. doi: 10.1021/np9004932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fowler BS, Laemmerhold KM, Miller SJ. Catalytic site-selective thiocarbonylations and deoxygenations of vancomycin reveal hydroxyl-dependent conformational effects. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9755–9761. doi: 10.1021/ja302692j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Allen CL, Miller SJ. Chiral copper(II) complex-catalyzed reactions of partially protected carbohydrates. Org Lett. 2013;15:6178–6181. doi: 10.1021/ol4033072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pathak TP, Miller SJ. Chemical tailoring of teicoplanin with site-selective reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:8415–8422. doi: 10.1021/ja4038998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Han S, Miller SJ. Asymmetric Catalysis at a distance: catalytic, site-selective phosphorylation of teicoplanin. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:12414–12421. doi: 10.1021/ja406067v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee D, Taylor MS. Borinic acid-catalyzed regioselective acylation of carbohydrate derivatives. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:3724–3727. doi: 10.1021/ja110332r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chan L, Taylor MS. Regioselective alkylation of carbohydrate derivatives catalyzed by a diarylborinic acid derivative. Org Lett. 2011;13:3090–3093. doi: 10.1021/ol200990e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gouliaras C, Lee D, Chan L, Taylor MS. Regioselective activation of glycosyl acceptors by a diarylborinic acid-derived catalyst. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:13926–13929. doi: 10.1021/ja2062715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee D, Williamson CL, Chan L, Taylor MS. Regioselective, borinic acid-catalyzed monoacylation, sulfonylation and alkylation of diols and carbohydrates: expansion of substrate scope and mechanistic studies. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:8260–8267. doi: 10.1021/ja302549c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lee D, Taylor MS. Regioselective silylation of pyranosides using a boronic acid/Lewis base co-catalyst system. Org Biomol Chem. 2013;11:5409–5412. doi: 10.1039/c3ob40981c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Beale TM, Taylor MS. Synthesis of cardiac glycoside analogs by catalyst-controlled, regioselective glycosylation of digitoxin. Org Lett. 2013;15:1358–1361. doi: 10.1021/ol4003042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Patman RL, Bower JF, Kim IS, Krische MJ. Formation of C–C bonds via catalytic hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation: vinylation, allylation, and enolate addition. Aldrichim Acta. 2008;41:95–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bower JF, Kim IS, Patman RL, Krische MJ. Catalytic carbonyl addition through transfer hydrogenation: a departure from preformed organometallic reagents. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:34–46. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bower JF, Krische MJ. Formation of C–C bonds via iridium-catalyzed hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation. Top Organomet Chem. 2011;34:107–138. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15334-1_5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hassan A, Krische MJ. Unlocking hydrogenation for C–C bond formation: a brief overview of enantioselective methods. Org Process Res Dev. 2011;15:1236–1242. doi: 10.1021/op200195m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Moran J, Krische MJ. Formation of C–C bonds via ruthenium-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation. Pure Appl Chem. 2012;84:1729–1739. doi: 10.1351/PAC-CON-11-10-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dechert-Schmitt A-MR, Schmitt DC, Gao X, Itoh T, Krische MJ. Polyketide construction via hydrohydroxyalkylation and related alcohol C–H functionalizations: reinventing the chemistry of carbonyl addition. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:504–513. doi: 10.1039/c3np70076c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ketcham JM, Shin I, Montgomery TP, Krische MJ. Catalytic enantioselective C–H functionalization of alcohols by redox-triggered carbonyl addition: borrowing hydrogen, returning carbon. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:9142–9150. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim IS, Ngai M-Y, Krische MJ. Enantioselective iridium-catalyzed carbonyl allylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level using allyl acetate as an allyl metal surrogate. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6340–6341. doi: 10.1021/ja802001b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim IS, Ngai M-Y, Krische MJ. Enantioselective iridium-catalyzed carbonyl allylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level via transfer hydrogenative coupling of allyl acetate: departure from chirally modified allyl metal reagents in carbonyl addition. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14891–14899. doi: 10.1021/ja805722e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lu Y, Kim IS, Hassan A, Del Valle DJ, Krische MJ. 1,n-Glycols as dialdehyde equivalents in iridium-catalyzed enantioselective carbonyl allylation and iterative two-directional assembly of 1,3-polyols. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:5018–5021. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hassan A, Lu Y, Krische MJ. Elongation of 1,3-polyols via iterative catalyst-directed carbonyl allylation from the alcohol oxidation level. Org Lett. 2009;11:3112–3115. doi: 10.1021/ol901136w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schmitt DC, Dechert-Schmitt A-MR, Krische MJ. Iridium-catalyzed allylation of chiral β-stereogenic alcohols: bypassing discrete formation of epimerizable aldehydes. Org Lett. 2012;14:6302–6305. doi: 10.1021/ol3030692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Han SB, Hassan A, Kim IS, Krische MJ. Total synthesis of (+)-roxaticin via C–C bond forming transfer hydrogenation: a departure from stoichiometric chiral reagents, auxiliaries, and premetalated nucleophiles in polyketide construction. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15559–15561. doi: 10.1021/ja1082798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lu Y, Woo SK, Krische MJ. Total synthesis of bryostatin 7 via C–C bond-forming hydrogenation. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:13876–13879. doi: 10.1021/ja205673e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gao X, Woo SK, Krische MJ. Total synthesis of 6-deoxyerythronolide B via C–C bond-forming transfer hydrogenation. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:4223–4226. doi: 10.1021/ja4008722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Del Valle DJ, Krische MJ. Total synthesis of (+)-trienomycins A and F via C–C bond-forming hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:10986–10989. doi: 10.1021/ja4061273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Waldeck AR, Krische MJ. Total synthesis of cyanolide A in the absence of protecting groups, chiral auxiliaries, or premetalated carbon nucleophiles. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:4470–4473. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yang Z, Zhang B, Zhao G, Yang J, Xie X, She X. Concise formal synthesis of (+)-neopeltolide. Org Lett. 2011;13:5916–5919. doi: 10.1021/ol2025718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Feng Y, Jiang X, De Brabander JK. Studies toward the unique pederin family member psymberin: full structure elucidation, two alternative total syntheses, and analogs. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:17083–17093. doi: 10.1021/ja3057612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wan S, Wu F, Rech JC, Green ME, Balachandran R, Horne WS, Day BW, Floreancig PE. Total synthesis and biological evaluation of pederin, psymberin, and highly potent analogs. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16668–16679. doi: 10.1021/ja207331m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kretschmer M, Dieckmann M, Li P, Rudolph S, Herkommer D, Troendlin J, Menche D. Modular total synthesis of rhizopodin: a highly potent G-actin dimerizing macrolide. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:15993–16018. doi: 10.1002/chem.201302197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sejberg JJP, Smith LD, Leatherbarrow RJ, Beavil AJ, Spivey AC. Enantioselective synthesis of (+)-aspercyclide A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013;54:4970–4972. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Willwacher J, Fürstner A. Catalysis-based total synthesis of putative mandelalide A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:4217–4221. doi: 10.1002/anie.201400605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Suzuki T. Organic synthesis involving iridium-catalyzed oxidation. Chem Rev. 2011;111:1825–1845. doi: 10.1021/cr100378r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lin Y, Zhu X, Zhou Y. A convenient lactonization of diols to γ- and δ-lactones catalyzed by transition metal polyhydrides. J Organomet Chem. 1992;429:269–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Suzuki T, Morita K, Tsuchida M, Hiroi K. Mild and chemoselective synthesis of lactones from diols using a novel metal–ligand bifunctional catalyst. Org Lett. 2002;4:2361–2363. doi: 10.1021/ol026091h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Suzuki T, Yamada T, Watanabe K, Katoh T. Iridium-catalyzed oxidative lactonization and intramolecular Tishchenko reaction of δ-ketoaldehydes for the synthesis of isocoumarins and 3,4-dihydroisocoumarins. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:2583–2585. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Suzuki T, Morita K, Ikemiyagi H, Watanabe K, Hiroi K, Katoh T. Synthesis of the hemiacetal pheromone of the spined citrus bug biprorulus bibax utilizing an iridium catalyzed oxidative lactonization. Heterocycles. 2006;69:457–461. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Königsmann M, Donati N, Stein D, Schönberg H, Harmer J, Sreekanth A, Grützmacher H. Metalloenzyme-inspired catalysis: selective oxidation of primary alcohols with an iridium–aminyl-radical complex. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:3567–3570. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Oger C, Brinkmann Y, Bouazzaoui S, Durand T, Galano J-M. Stereocontrolled access to isoprostanes via a bicycle[3.3.0]octene framework. Org Lett. 2008;10:5087–5090. doi: 10.1021/ol802104z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Arita S, Koike T, Kayaki Y, Ikariya T. Aerobic oxidation of alcohols with bifunctional transition-metal catalysts bearing C–N chelate ligands. Chem Asian J. 2008;3:1479–1485. doi: 10.1002/asia.200800137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kosaka M, Sekiguchi S, Naito J, Uemura M, Kuwahara S, Watanabe M, Harada N, Hiroi K. Synthesis of enantiopure phthalides including 3-butylphthalide, a fragrance component of celery oil, and determination of their absolute configurations. Chirality. 2005;17:218–232. doi: 10.1002/chir.20156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Suzuki T, Morita K, Matsuo Y, Hiroi K. Catalytic asymmetric oxidative lactonizations of meso-diols using a chiral iridium complex. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:2003–2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dechert-Schmitt A-MR, Schmitt DC, Krische MJ. Protecting-group-free diastereoselective C–C coupling of 1,3-glycols and allyl acetate through site-selective primary alcohol dehydrogenation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:3195–3198. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shin I, Wang G, Krische MJ. Catalyst-directed diastereo- and site-selectivity in successive nucleophilic and electrophilic allylations of chiral 1,3-diols: protecting-group-free synthesis of substituted pyrans. Chem Eur J. 2014;20:13382–13389. doi: 10.1002/chem.201404065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ramachandran PV. Pinane-based versatile “allyl”boranes. Aldrichim Acta. 2002;35:23–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Denmark SE, Fu J. Catalytic enantioselective addition of allylic organometallic reagents to aldehydes and ketones. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2763–2793. doi: 10.1021/cr020050h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yu C-M, Youn J, Jung H-K. Regulation of stereoselectivity and reactivity in the inter- and intramolecular allylic transfer reactions. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2006;27:463–472. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Marek I, Sklute G. Creation of quaternary stereocenters in carbonyl allylation reactions. Chem Commun. 2007:1683–1691. doi: 10.1039/b615042j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hall DG. Lewis and Brønsted acid catalyzed allylboration of carbonyl compounds: from discovery to mechanism and applications. Synlett. 2007:1644–1655. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lachance H, Hall DG. Allyboration of carbonyl compounds. Org React. 2008;73:1–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yus M, González-Gómez JC, Foubelo F. Catalytic enantioselective allylation of carbonyl compounds and imines. Chem Rev. 2011;111:7774–7854. doi: 10.1021/cr1004474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Denmark SE, Ghosh SK. The first catalytic, diastereoselective, and enantioselective crossed-aldol reactions of aldehydes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:4759–4762. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011217)40:24<4759::aid-anie4759>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rychnovsky SD, Skalitzky DJ. A practical preparation of α-alkoxylithium reagents: synthesis of syn or anti 1,3-diols. J Org Chem. 1992;57:4336–4339. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Marriner GA, Garner SA, Jang H-Y, Krische MJ. Metallo-aldehyde enolates via enal hydrogenation: catalytic cross aldolization with glyoxal partners as applied to the synthesis of 3,5-disubstituted pyridazines. J Org Chem. 2004;69:1380–1382. doi: 10.1021/jo030310a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fu F, Loh T-P. An asymmetric synthesis of the polyol fragment of the polyene macrolide antibiotic RK-397. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:3530–3533. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mengel A, Reiser O. Around and beyond Cram's rule. Chem Rev. 1999;99:1191–1223. doi: 10.1021/cr980379w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Feng J, Garza VJ, Krische MJ. Redox-triggered C–C Coupling of alcohols and vinyl epoxides: diastereo- and enantioselective formation of all-carbon quaternary centers via tert-(hydroxy)-prenylation. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8911–8914. doi: 10.1021/ja504625m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wang G, Franke J, Ngo CQ, Krische MJ. Diastereo- and Enantioselective Iridium Catalyzed Coupling of Vinyl Aziridines and Alcohols: Site-Selective Modification of Unprotected Diols and Synthesis of Substituted Piperidines. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04404. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES