Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2015 Dec 17;20(1):71–80. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12746

Comparison of Chromosome 4 gene expression profile between lung telocytes and other local cell types

Dongli Song 1, Dragos Cretoiu 2,3, Minghuan Zheng 1, Mengjia Qian 1, Miaomiao Zhang 1, Sanda M Cretoiu 2,3,, Luonan Chen 4, Hao Fang 5,, Laurentiu M Popescu 2,3,, Xiangdong Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC4717865  PMID: 26678350

Abstract

Telocytes (TCs) are new cellular entities of mesenchymal origin described almost ubiquitously in human and mammalian organs (www.telocytes.com). Different subtypes of TCs were described, all forming networks in the interstitial space by homo‐ and heterocellular junctions. Previous studies analysed the gene expression profiles of chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 17 and 18 of murine pulmonary TCs. In this study, we analysed by bioinformatics tools the gene expression profiles of chromosome 4 for murine pulmonary TCs and compared it with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), fibroblasts (Fbs), alveolar type II cells (ATII), airway basal cells, proximal airway cells, CD8(+) T cells from bronchial lymph nodes (T‐BL) and CD8(+) T cells from lungs (T‐L). Key functional genes were identified with the aid of the reference library of the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database. Seventeen genes were up‐regulated and 56 genes were down‐regulated in chromosome 4 of TCs compared with other cells. Four genes (Akap2, Gpr153, Sdc3 and Tbc1d2) were up‐regulated between one and fourfold and one gene, Svep1, was overexpressed over fourfold. The main functional networks were identified and analysed, pointing out to a TCs involvement in cellular signalling, regulation of tissue inflammation and cell expansion and movement.

Keywords: chromosome 4, telocytes, mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells, lymphocytes

Introduction

Telocytes (TCs) are newly described cells of the interstitial space 1, 2 which are ubiquitously distributed in mice and humans 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. Telocytes are likely to have a mesenchymal origin 18 and are best characterized by very long extensions called telopodes (Tps) (for details see reviews 17, 19. They were characterized in terms of ultrastructure 20, 21, immunophenotype 22, proteomic 23, gene profile 24, 25, 26 and miRNA imprint 27, 28, 29 and shown to be different from fibroblasts, mesenchymal cells or endothelial cells. Moreover, TCs display distinct electrophysiological properties 30, 31, 32, 33. The very long (tens to hundreds of micrometres) Tps classically described as an alternation of dilated regions—podoms and filamentous regions—podomers, were recently viewed by FIB‐SEM tomography 3D reconstruction 2. Therefore, the real aspect of Tps consists in regions with classical aspect of beads on a string appearance and ‘ribbon‐like’ regions 34.

Telocytes were suggested to participate in intercellular information exchange and interactions by extracellular vesicle release 29, 35. In addition, their secretome might have a modulatory role in stem cell proliferation and differentiation 36. Other hypotheses, plead in favour of a role as progenitor cells during inflammatory/repair processes 37. Telocytes have recently been shown to act as progenitor cells in adulthood, being able to differentiate in cells like interstitial cells of Cajal, myofibroblasts and even in fibroblasts 38. Also, during morphogenesis, it might be possible to behave like inductors/regulators of differentiation for parenchymal cells 38, 39.

Our previous studies identified characters and patterns of TCs‐specific or TCs‐dominated gene profiles in chromosome 1, 2, 3, 17 and 18 using global comparison between TCs and other cell types found in the mouse lung tissue 24, 25, 26. To further study the characters and patterns of TC‐specific or TC‐dominated gene expression profiles, we currently performed a detailed analysis for chromosome 4, and investigated the characteristic gene networks and potential functional association using bioinformatics tools. Pulmonary TCs in cell culture, harvested on day 5 (TC5) and on day 10 (TC10) were compared with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), fibroblasts (Fbs), alveolar type II cells (ATII), airway basal cells (ABCs), proximal airway cells (PACs), CD8+ T cells from bronchial lymph nodes (T‐BL) and CD8+ T cells from lung (T‐L). Key functional genes were identified with the aid of the reference library of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus database.

Material and methods

Isolation and culture

Telocytes were isolated from the lung tissues of mice, primary cultured in a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/cm2, and harvested on days 5 (TC5) and on days 10 (TC10), as previously described 28. RNA isolation, preparation, labelling and hybridization for DNA microarray (The Mouse 4 × 44K Gene Expression Array; Agilent, Shanghai, China), we gained about 39,000+ mouse genes and transcripts represented with public domain annotations, according to the protocol of One‐Color Microarray‐Based Gene Expression Analysis. The hybridized arrays were washed, fixed and scanned by the Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (part number G2505B).

Data collection and mining

The gene expression profiles of pulmonary TC5 and TC10, Fbs and MSCs were collected from a previous study 28. Gene expression profiles for ATII, ABCs, PACs, T‐BL and T‐L were obtained from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE6846 40, GSE27379 41, GSE28651 42). The microarray was composed of 45,101 probes. First, we eliminated the probe sets without corresponding official symbol, leaving 39,417 probes and 21,680 genes.

Identification of differentially expressed genes

The identification of differentially expressed genes was done as the method described in our previous study 24. Briefly, after the acquired data normalized with quantile normalization, the probe level (*_norm_RMA.pair) files and gene level (*_RMA.calls) files were generated. Subsequent data processing was further analysed with Agilent GeneSpring GX software (version 11.5.1) software package and differentially expressed genes were identified through fold change filtering. Hierarchically clustered was performed with the Agilent GeneSpring GX software (version 11.5.1). Gene Ontology analysis and String Network analyses were performed with the standard enrichment computation method to uncover the relevance among variant proteins expressed by variant genes.

Eight‐five per cent of mouse genes (approx. 20,000–25,000 genes) is very similar with the human genes. This study investigates gene expression profiles of chromosome 4 in different lung cell populations to search for TC‐specific regulated genes. Up‐ or down‐regulated folds of TC‐genes were calculated by comparison with other cells and subtracted its own multiple of TC, after the average of gene expression in each cells.

Results

Table 1 presents the global analysis of chromosome 4 genes in lung TCs. We found that 17 genes were up‐regulated and 56 genes were down‐regulated in chromosome 4 of TCs. Among the up‐regulated genes, 12 genes (1700009N14Rik, Aurkaip1, Fam176b, Fbxo6, Hspg2, Macf1, Mast2, Otud3, Plekhm2, Tm2d1, Tmem59, Zcchc17) were overexpressed between zero and onefold (Table 1A), 4 genes (Akap2, Gpr153, Sdc3, Tbc1d2) were up‐regulated between one and fourfold (Table 1B) and one gene, Svep1, was overexpressed over fourfold, in both TC D5 and TC D10, as compared with other cells (Table 1C). The genes highly expressed in TC5 were similar with those in TC10 and different from MSCs, Fbs, ATII, ABCs, PACs, T‐BL or T‐L. The direct (physical) and indirect (functional) relationships, including associations, of these genes were analysed by String Network analysis and the interactions and potential functional links between these genes are displayed in Figure 1.

Table 1.

Summary of up‐regulated genes in TCs, as compared with others. (A) Genes up‐regulated between zero and onefold in TCs as compared with others. (B) Genes up‐regulated between one and fourfold in TCs as compared with others. (C) Genes up‐regulated >fourfold in TCs as compared with others

Compared pairs/fold up‐regulated >0 >1 >4
TC5 versus others 51 13 3
TC10 versus others 34 8 1
TCs versus others 17 5 1
Gene symbol Folds (TC5 versus others/TC10 versus others)
Fibroblast Stem ATII CD8_T_BL CD8_T_LL Basal_cell Duct_cell
(A)
1700009N14Rik −0.98/−0.99 −0.97/−0.97 −0.72/−0.8 −0.41/−0.6 −0.23/−0.47 −0.47/−0.64 −0.49/−0.65
Aurkaip1 −0.37/−0.09 −0.46/−0.22 −0.35/−0.32 −0.43/−0.42 −0.48/−0.47 −0.61/−0.6 −0.51/−0.5
Fam176b −0.73/−0.73 −0.86/−0.86 −0.09/−0.34 −0.36/−0.55 −0.56/−0.69 −0.88/−0.92 −0.94/−0.96
Fbxo6 −0.33/−0.17 −0.56/−0.45 −0.6/−0.64 −0.83/−0.85 −0.89/−0.9 −0.77/−0.8 −0.84/−0.86
Hspg2 −0.62/−0.7 −0.21/−0.38 −0.69/−0.82 −0.7/−0.83 −0.6/−0.77 −0.76/−0.87 −0.84/−0.91
Macf1 −0.74/−0.66 −0.5/−0.35 −0.64/−0.67 −0.52/−0.56 −0.47/−0.51 −0.65/−0.68 −0.46/−0.51
Mast2 −0.48/−0.15 −0.62/−0.38 −0.92/−0.9 −0.96/−0.95 −0.95/−0.94 −0.81/−0.79 −0.87/−0.85
Otud3 −0.61/−0.5 −0.79/−0.73 −0.4/−0.43 −0.09/−0.16 −0.18/−0.24 −0.12/−0.2 −0.11/−0.19
Plekhm2 −0.36/−0.6 −0.17/−0.49 −0.46/−0.76 −0.51/−0.78 −0.47/−0.77 −0.77/−0.9 −0.72/−0.87
Tm2d1 −0.32/−0.14 −0.43/−0.27 −0.39/−0.44 −0.27/−0.35 −0.36/−0.42 −0.28/−0.35 −0.23/−0.31
Tmem59 −0.51/−0.43 −0.45/−0.36 −0.99/−0.99 −0.99/−0.99 −0.99/−0.99 −1/−1 −1/−1
Zcchc17 −0.53/−0.45 −0.67/−0.61 −0.54/−0.61 −0.08/−0.23 −0.59/−0.65 −0.62/−0.69 −0.76/−0.8
(B)
Akap2 −0.89/−0.81 −0.73/−0.54 −0.78/−0.73 −0.78/−0.74 −0.82/−0.78 −0.79/−0.75 −0.82/−0.78
Gpr153 −0.93/−0.92 −0.66/−0.61 −0.67/−0.72 −0.98/−0.99 −0.96/−0.97 −0.98/−0.99 −0.92/−0.93
Sdc3 −0.74/−0.62 −0.88/−0.83 −0.65/−0.62 −0.84/−0.83 −0.73/−0.71 −0.79/−0.78 −0.87/−0.87
Tbc1d2 −0.91/−0.78 −0.99/−0.97 −0.78/−0.6 −0.99/−0.98 −0.97/−0.94 −0.8/−0.65 −0.94/−0.9
(C)
Svep1 −0.97/−0.97 −0.84/−0.83 −0.9/−0.92 −0.95/−0.96 −0.95/−0.97 −0.95/−0.96 −0.94/−0.95

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression profiles of the selected genes as an active group of chromosome 4 of telocytes (TCs) isolated and cultured from mouse lungs on days 5 (D5) and 10 (D10), as compared with fibroblasts (Fbs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), alveolar type II cells (ATII), airway basal cells (ABCs), proximal airway cells (PACs), CD8+ T cells come from bronchial lymph nodes (T‐BL), and CD8+ T cells from lung (T‐L) respectively (A). The profiles for entire genes are described in Supplementary Document 1. The selected core network and whole mouse network are linked by the documented functional interactions from various databases (see Materials and methods). Genes in each network are indicated in red and some of their nearest neighbours are indicated by dark grey nodes. A group of telocyte genes up‐regulated and down‐regulated more than zerofold as compared with all other cells and existed in telocytes on days 10 and 5 were selected as telocyte‐specific or dominated genes in chromosome 4 (A). Top 50 up‐ or down‐regulated genes of each cells were also evaluated and their distribution within chromosome 4 genes showed the difference between cells (B). Details of the selected network in each cell type are in Figures S1–S9.

Among the down‐regulated genes, 54 genes were expressed zero and onefold in TCs than in other cells (Table 2A) and 2 genes, Masp2 and Rngtt (Table 2B) were one to fourfold lower in TCs than in other cells.

Table 2.

Summary of down‐regulated genes in TCs, as compared with others. (A) Genes down‐regulated between zero and onefold in TCs as compared with others. (B) Genes down‐regulated between one and fourfold in TCs as compared with others

Compared pairs/fold down‐regulated >0 >1 >4
TC5 versus others 70 3 0
TC10 versus others 142 10 0
TCs versus others 56 2 0
Gene symbol Folds (TC5 versus others/TC10 versus others)
Fibroblast Stem ATII CD8_T_BL CD8_T_LL Basal_cell Duct_cell
(A)
1700013G24Rik 0.18/0.28 0.34/0.45 1.43/0.93 0.39/0.07 5.42/4.01 50.81/38.78 22.78/17.36
2210012G02Rik 1.36/0.8 0.68/0.28 31.01/16.83 100.21/53.77 56/30.27 44.47/23.55 21.26/11.08
2610301B20Rik 1.63/1.75 1.3/1.41 7.41/5.43 4.38/2.99 0.97/0.48 3.12/2.05 1.17/0.61
2610528B01Rik 0.66/0.34 15.64/12.46 17.59/9.98 49.88/28.21 12.65/6.94 31.04/17.35 15.34/8.41
4930535I16Rik 10.92/6.52 0.98/0.25 11.07/4.56 1.28/0.02 2/0.36 17.05/7.07 18.12/7.59
5430416O09Rik 0.44/0.78 0.21/0.5 22.22/19.97 1.13/0.87 1.01/0.79 3.05/2.55 1.3/1.03
9430015G10Rik 0.98/1.38 0.12/0.35 7.93/6.85 34.35/29.18 26.31/22.64 20.37/17.21 12.22/10.32
9930104L06Rik 0.4/0.68 0.4/0.68 0.43/0.25 2.83/2.26 2.36/1.9 8.44/7.02 1.86/1.44
AA415398 0.6/0.16 0.38/0.01 8.93/4.29 3.07/1.11 8.47/3.97 20.5/10.11 17.32/8.52
Agmat 0.35/0.57 0.09/0.27 3.74/3.04 4.14/3.26 7.97/6.53 19.18/15.67 13.9/11.38
Anp32b 0.43/0.8 1.35/1.96 1.59/1.39 2.42/2.07 1.88/1.62 14.09/12.48 14.37/12.8
BC057079 0.14/0.46 0.33/0.7 3.03/2.77 7.53/6.75 6.72/6.1 3.87/3.41 6.1/5.47
Btf3l4 0.49/1.07 0.11/0.53 2.78/2.84 2.63/2.58 1.29/1.29 4.31/4.22 3.69/3.63
C430048L16Rik 1.28/2.16 0.75/1.43 0.23/0.25 1.2/1.17 2.54/2.53 3.67/3.59 1.08/1.06
Cap1 3.57/6.8 3.03/5.89 0.2/0.5 1.47/1.99 0.48/0.81 2.88/3.7 3.74/4.77
Casp8ap2 0.1/0.45 0.29/0.7 3.9/3.71 38.04/35.47 51.64/48.86 4.79/4.4 1.56/1.4
Ccnl2 0.52/1.57 0.07/0.8 1.09/1.57 16.55/20.03 15.86/19.48 4.59/5.69 3.58/4.51
Chd5 0.87/0.28 7.33/4.71 21.45/10.24 40.34/19.1 36.74/17.61 69.19/33.06 27.74/13.02
Clcnkb 1.03/1.24 1.08/1.3 12.27/9.73 1.13/0.67 0.44/0.15 8.62/6.54 4.45/3.29
Col16a1 0.43/0.3 3.97/3.52 2.13/1.08 1.25/0.45 2.43/1.25 4.61/2.62 2.81/1.47
Cyp4a31 7.9/17.22 5.85/13.02 0.04/0.56 0.8/1.62 1.47/2.64 7.54/11.38 0.96/1.86
Dennd4c 0.44/0.82 0.06/0.34 167.81/154.43 223.55/199.84 388.03/351.76 177.75/158.54 132.18/118.48
Dnajc11 0.04/0.35 0.16/0.51 7.39/6.99 11.28/10.37 4.03/3.71 5.72/5.21 4.66/4.25
Eif2b3 0.31/0.56 0.72/1.05 6.17/5.24 4.11/3.32 2.29/1.82 7.03/5.77 7.08/5.85
Gja10 0.28/1.02 0.2/0.9 0.91/1.21 1.69/2.01 7.08/8.17 7.59/8.6 2.81/3.28
Gng10 0.15/0.05 0.94/0.77 1.94/0.97 17.25/10.86 10.63/6.66 3.4/1.85 2.47/1.26
Gpr3 0.71/1.32 0.61/1.18 0.55/0.54 0.9/0.83 2.68/2.59 6.6/6.3 2.08/1.97
Guca2b 0.49/1.03 0.39/0.89 6.42/6.38 20.5/19.76 0.41/0.38 1.58/1.49 1.93/1.83
Htr6 0.05/0.32 0.11/0.39 2.89/2.55 6.02/5.23 3.42/2.98 17.29/15.2 7.1/6.21
Itgb3bp 1.69/3.05 0.19/0.8 0.32/0.46 1.37/1.54 1.09/1.27 2.05/2.26 2.07/2.29
Lrp8 1.39/1.05 0.33/0.14 1.94/0.85 3.72/1.88 8.57/4.92 8.29/4.66 6.82/3.79
Mdn1 0.05/0.2 4.47/5.26 2.63/2.04 22.03/17.71 17.2/13.99 3.22/2.42 3.95/3.03
Mrpl50 1.02/1.86 0.62/1.3 1.23/1.32 1.47/1.49 0.87/0.91 5.43/5.46 3.48/3.53
Mysm1 0.25/0.63 0.1/0.43 1.13/1.03 5.56/5.09 9.49/8.87 1.59/1.4 0.57/0.46
Nfx1 0.43/0.7 0.47/0.75 6.99/5.95 12.45/10.37 7.26/6.08 16.28/13.58 11.53/9.63
Padi1 2.1/2.28 0.69/0.79 1.6/1.01 3.92/2.7 1.26/0.72 53.37/39.8 39.89/29.84
Pnrc2 0.51/0.96 0.52/0.96 0.52/0.44 2.07/1.82 1.01/0.87 4.13/3.69 2.29/2.02
Ppie 0.2/0.42 0.02/0.21 8.3/7.04 25.22/21.02 12.55/10.53 12.31/10.15 9.68/7.99
Ppp1r8 0.03/0.39 0.59/1.14 14.59/14.36 16.61/15.85 8.84/8.55 9.57/9.09 12.5/11.96
Prpf4 0.29/0.99 1.69/3.16 2.13/2.53 2.49/2.83 2.09/2.44 2.16/2.46 2.69/3.06
Psip1 0.7/1.66 1.75/3.31 0.03/0.18 6.21/7.02 4.28/4.95 0.41/0.56 0.73/0.93
Rbm12b 0.85/1.48 0.01/0.36 0.77/0.74 3.16/2.96 1.96/1.86 42.69/40.57 21.65/20.66
Rere 0.04/0.53 0.03/0.53 114.9/123.97 372.04/389.75 288.69/306.63 246.05/257.22 213.01/223.85
Sit1 0.93/1.91 0.02/0.55 18.38/20.41 58.46/62.81 54.15/59.01 8.62/9.3 3.99/4.38
Slc1a7 0.2/0.6 1.06/1.75 5.81/5.62 1.34/1.21 6.5/6.18 6.15/5.74 2.64/2.45
Slc24a2 0.97/0.64 0.33/0.11 9.22/5.23 3.07/1.41 8.6/4.76 12.23/6.81 18.21/10.41
Smpdl3b 0.11/0.34 1.56/2.08 8.18/7.07 2.69/2.16 7.17/6.08 2.72/2.17 3.6/2.94
Snip1 0.2/0.24 0.14/0.17 23.93/17.75 54.13/39.28 68.21/50.28 13.91/9.87 7.79/5.45
Tle1 0.01/0.37 0.21/0.65 4.58/4.54 1.34/1.26 1.77/1.71 0.43/0.37 0.85/0.79
Trim14 0.45/0.52 0.26/0.32 19.25/14.53 112.18/83.33 51.76/38.86 21.63/15.83 3.67/2.49
Txndc12 2.21/2.33 0.22/0.26 10.57/7.78 4.87/3.33 1.62/0.96 7.28/5.08 6.21/4.33
Ubxn11 4.39/4.71 0.2/0.27 12.07/9.12 21.95/16.25 12.9/9.6 9.9/7.17 4.79/3.37
Usp1 0.72/1.35 0.1/0.51 0.77/0.78 5.14/4.97 3.1/3.04 1.59/1.51 1.81/1.74
Wwp1 0.01/0.12 0.27/0.41 43.21/34.92 46.36/36.37 61.11/48.69 81.23/63.75 83.25/65.68
(B)
Masp2 13.13/11.07 3.8/3.1 9.4/5.49 23.91/14.1 38.75/23.43 27.31/16.13 20.68/12.18
Rngtt 1.03/1.48 1.25/1.75 1.26/1.02 7.58/6.44 4.49/3.83 2.87/2.35 2.3/1.87

Details of up‐ or down gene variations of chromosome 4 were listed in Table S1. The hierarchical cluster plot of the differentially expressed genes illustrated as coded colours (Fig. 2) clearly shows that TCs are less related with the other cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hierarchical cluster analysis of the differentially expressed genes on chromosomes 4 among telocytes (TCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), fibroblasts (Fbs), lymphocytes from lungs (T‐LL) and from bronchial lymph nodes (T‐BL), alveolar type II cells (ATII), proximal airway cells (PAC) and airway basal cells (ABC). The differences are described by fold changes and the expression value of genes in TC5 are controls.

Table 3 presents a set of genes were found specifically up‐ or down‐regulated in pulmonary TCs, as compared with Fbs, MSCs, ATII, ABCs, PACs, T‐BL or T‐L respectively. A set of genes up‐ or down‐regulated more than onefold in TC5 were 233 or 49, 249 or 46, 78 or 408, 123 or 378, 125 or 375, whereas the genes up‐ or down‐regulated more than onefold in TC10 were 163 or 92, 164 or 94, 71 or 410, 133 or 372 and 123 or 368.

Table 3.

The number of genes specifically up‐ or down‐regulated in pulmonary TCs as compared with other cells respectively

Compared pairs Up >0 Up >1 Up >4 Down >0 Down >1 Down >4
TC10 versus fibroblast 367 163 53 353 92 23
TC5 versus fibroblast 510 233 69 210 49 12
TCs versus fibroblast 354 149 45 197 42 12
TC10 versus stem 425 164 43 295 94 19
TC5 versus stem 551 249 59 169 46 11
TCs versus stem 419 144 33 163 45 11
TC10 versus ATII 171 71 17 549 410 229
TC5 versus ATII 174 78 20 546 408 225
TCs versus ATII 147 61 12 522 383 201
TC10 versus CD8BL 225 133 60 495 372 201
TC5 versus CD8BL 229 123 65 491 378 205
TCs versus CD8BL 204 110 52 470 346 181
TC10 versus CD8LL 208 123 56 512 368 194
TC5 versus CD8LL 217 125 59 503 375 208
TCs versus CD8LL 185 107 50 480 342 178
TC10 versus basal cell 128 57 16 592 497 308
TC5 versus basal cell 131 57 20 589 499 316
TCs versus basal cell 111 44 13 572 472 287
TC10 versus duct cell 156 85 32 564 464 267
TC5 versus duct cell 155 82 33 565 461 271
TCs versus duct cell 144 69 27 553 436 239

Discussion

Mouse genome is extremely valuable for research since the human and mouse genomes are remarkably similar not only in the structure of their chromosomes but also at the level of DNA sequence. Chromosome 4 represents more than 6 per cent of the total DNA in cells and likely contains 1000–1100 genes 43. In humans, many genetic disorders stemming from chromosome 4 genes are described, e.g. achondroplasia, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, Huntington's disease, to name but a few. Mouse chromosome 4 has a total number of genes of 2430 which encode a number of 1270 proteins.

This study was dedicated to the global analysis of chromosome 4 genes of lung TCs compared with Fbs, MSCs, ATII, ABCs, PACs, T‐BL and T‐L of which 720 genes were measured by bioinformatics tools. We found that 17 genes were up‐regulated and 56 genes were down‐regulated in chromosome 4 of TCs as compared with other cell types.

Four genes, Akap2, Gpr153, Sdc3, Tbc1d2, were found to be more than onefold up‐regulated in TCs as compared with other cell types. Akap2 (A‐kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 2) gene encodes a protein involved in signalling pathways (G Protein signalling pathways and signal transduction PKA) and in modulation of actin filament dynamics 44, 45. Gpr153 (G protein‐coupled receptor 153) gene encodes an orphan receptor with elusive functions 46. Sdc3 (syndecan 3) gene encodes a cell surface proteoglycan (heparan sulphate) involved in the organization of cell shape by affecting the actin cytoskeleton, possibly by transferring signals from the cell surface which seems to have a selectively pro‐inflammatory function 47. Tbc1d2 (TBC1 domain family member 2A) gene encodes a protein found in cell junctions and cytoplasmic vesicles and is apparently involved in positive regulation of GTPase activity and vesicle trafficking 48. Svep1 (sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain containing 1) gene encodes a protein involved in cell adhesion 49. Small GTP ases regulate intracellular trafficking (budding, transport and fusion of vesicles) 50 and also intervene in cytoskeletal remodelling, migration and adhesion events 51. Therefore, all these up‐regulated genes encode proteins involved in cell signalling pathways and cytoskeleton organization and imply that TCs could integrate signals and auto‐regulate its own fate, integrating autophagy with endocytic trafficking 52. Moreover, since there are no data regarding the involvement of these four genes in any pulmonary pathology, the precise significance of those up‐regulated genes in TCs still remains unclear.

Among the down‐expressed genes in TCs, Masp2 (mannan‐binding lectin serine peptidase 2) and Rngtt (RNA guanylyltransferase and 5′‐phosphatase) genes were one to fourfold lower comparative with other cells.

Conclusion

Our data showed, by global analyses, that 73 TCs‐specific or dominant genes in chromosome 4 are different from other lung tissue resident cells or immune migrated cells. Current findings are supportive for our previous studies of TC‐specific gene profiles and potential functional correlations, pointing out the same suggested roles for TCs 24, 25, 26. Thus, TCs appear once more to have a significant role in cellular signalling, regulation of tissue inflammation, and cell expansion and movement.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supporting information

Figure S1 Details of the selected core network genes in telocytes isolated from the mouse lung and cultured for 10 days in chromosome 4.

Figure S2 Details of the selected core network genes in telocytes isolated from the mouse lung and cultured for 5 days in chromosome 4.

Figure S3 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse mesenchymal stem cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S4 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse fibroblasts in chromosome 4.

Figure S5 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse alveolar type II cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S6 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse proximal airway cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S7 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse airway basal cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S8 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse CD8+ T cells come from bronchial lymph nodes in chromosome 4.

Figure S9 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse CD8+ T cells from lung in chromosome 4.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported (for DC) by the Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development (SOP HRD), financed from the European Social Fund and by the Romanian Government under the contract number POSDRU/89/1.5/S/141531. It was also funded by grants of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number 82/2012 and 194/2014. The work was supported by Zhongshan Distinguished Professor Grant (XDW), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (91230204, 81270099, 81320108001, 81270131, 81300010), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (12JC1402200, 12431900207, 11410708600, 14431905100), Operation funding of Shanghai Institute of Clinical Bioinformatics, and Ministry of Education, Academic Special Science and Research Foundation for PhD Education (20130071110043).

References

  • 1. Popescu LM, Faussone‐Pellegrini MS. TELOCYTES ‐ a case of serendipity: the winding way from Interstitial Cells of Cajal (ICC), via Interstitial Cajal‐Like Cells (ICLC) to TELOCYTES. J Cell Mol Med. 2010; 14: 729–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cretoiu D, Hummel E, Zimmermann H, et al Human cardiac telocytes: 3D imaging by FIB‐SEM tomography. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 2157–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nicolescu MI, Popescu LM. Telocytes in the interstitium of human exocrine pancreas: ultrastructural evidence. Pancreas. 2012; 41: 949–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cretoiu D, Cretoiu SM, Simionescu AA, et al Telocytes, a distinct type of cell among the stromal cells present in the lamina propria of jejunum. Histol Histopathol. 2012; 27: 1067–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zheng Y, Zhu T, Lin M, et al Telocytes in the urinary system. J Transl Med. 2012; 10: 188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Popescu LM. Human myometrium ‐ the ultrastructural 3D network of telocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2012; 16: 2844–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mou Y, Wang Y, Li J, et al Immunohistochemical characterization and functional identification of mammary gland telocytes in the self‐assembly of reconstituted breast cancer tissue in vitro . J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 65–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Corradi LS, Jesus MM, Fochi RA, et al Structural and ultrastructural evidence for telocytes in prostate stroma. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 398–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Diaz‐Flores L, Gutierrez R, Saez FJ, et al Telocytes in neuromuscular spindles. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 457–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Luesma MJ, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Telocytes and stem cells in limbus and uvea of mouse eye. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 1016–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chen X, Zheng Y, Manole CG, et al Telocytes in human oesophagus. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 1506–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Xiao J, Wang F, Liu Z, et al Telocytes in liver: electron microscopic and immunofluorescent evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 1537–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yang Y, Sun W, Wu SM, et al Telocytes in human heart valves. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 759–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Li H, Zhang H, Yang L, et al Telocytes in mice bone marrow: electron microscope evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 975–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li H, Lu S, Liu H, et al Scanning electron microscope evidence of telocytes in vasculature. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 1486–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vannucchi MG, Traini C, Guasti D, et al Telocytes subtypes in human urinary bladder. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 2000–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tao L, Wang H, Wang X, et al Cardiac telocytes. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015; doi: 10.2174/1574888X10666150113113420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Diaz‐Flores L, Gutierrez R, Garcia MP, et al Human resident CD34+ stromal cells/telocytes have progenitor capacity and are a source of alphaSMA+ cells during repair. Histol Histopathol. 2015; 30: 615–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Roatesi I, Radu BM, Cretoiu D, et al Uterine telocytes: a review of current knowledge. Biol Reprod. 2015; 93: 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ullah S, Yang P, Zhang L, et al Identification and characterization of telocytes in the uterus of the oviduct in the Chinese soft‐shelled turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis: TEM evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 2385–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cantarero I, Luesma MJ, Alvarez‐Dotu JM, et al Transmission electron microscopy as key technique for the characterization of telocytes. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015; doi: 10.2174/1574888X10666150306155435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhou Q, Wei L, Zhong C, et al Cardiac telocytes are double positive for CD34/PDGFR‐alpha. J Cell Mol Med. 2015; 19: 2036–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zheng Y, Cretoiu D, Yan G, et al Protein profiling of human lung telocytes and microvascular endothelial cells using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 1035–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sun X, Zheng M, Zhang M, et al Differences in the expression of chromosome 1 genes between lung telocytes and other cells: mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 801–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zheng M, Sun X, Zhang M, et al Variations of chromosomes 2 and 3 gene expression profiles among pulmonary telocytes, pneumocytes, airway cells, mesenchymal stem cells and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 2044–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang J, Ye L, Jin M, et al Global analyses of Chromosome 17 and 18 genes of lung telocytes compared with mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells, and lymphocytes. Biol Direct. 2015; 10: 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cismasiu VB, Radu E, Popescu LM. miR‐193 expression differentiates telocytes from other stromal cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2011; 15: 1071–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zheng Y, Zhang M, Qian M, et al Genetic comparison of mouse lung telocytes with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 567–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cismasiu VB, Popescu LM. Telocytes transfer extracellular vesicles loaded with microRNAs to stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2015; 19: 351–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sheng J, Shim W, Lu J, et al Electrophysiology of human cardiac atrial and ventricular telocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 355–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cretoiu SM, Radu BM, Banciu A, et al Isolated human uterine telocytes: immunocytochemistry and electrophysiology of T‐type calcium channels. Histochem Cell Biol. 2015; 143: 83–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Marin A, et al Telocytes: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and electrophysiological characteristics in human myometrium. Reproduction. 2013; 145: 357–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Campeanu RA, Radu BM, Cretoiu SM, et al Near‐infrared low‐level laser stimulation of telocytes from human myometrium. Lasers Med Sci. 2014; 29: 1867–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cretoiu D, Gherghiceanu M, Hummel E, et al FIB‐SEM tomography of human skin telocytes and their extracellular vesicles. J Cell Mol Med. 2015; 19: 714–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Fertig ET, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Extracellular vesicles release by cardiac telocytes: electron microscopy and electron tomography. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 1938–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Albulescu R, Tanase C, Codrici E, et al The secretome of myocardial telocytes modulates the activity of cardiac stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2015; 19: 1783–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yang XJ, Yang J, Liu Z, et al Telocytes damage in endometriosis‐affected rat oviduct and potential impact on fertility. J Cell Mol Med. 2015; 19: 452–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Maria‐Giuliana V, Daniele B, Maria‐Simonetta FP. Telocytes contribute as cell progenitors and differentiation inductors in tissue regeneration. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015; doi: 10.2174/1574888X10666150528142741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bani D, Nistri S. New insights into the morphogenic role of stromal cells and their relevance for regenerative medicine. Lessons from the heart. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18: 363–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Xu Y, Ikegami M, Wang Y, et al Gene expression and biological processes influenced by deletion of Stat3 in pulmonary type II epithelial cells. BMC Genom. 2007; 8: 455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Tosiek MJ, Gruber AD, Bader SR, et al CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells are dispensable for controlling CD8+ T cell‐mediated lung inflammation. J Immunol. 2011; 186: 6106–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hegab AE, Ha VL, Gilbert JL, et al Novel stem/progenitor cell population from murine tracheal submucosal gland ducts with multipotent regenerative potential. Stem Cells. 2011; 29: 1283–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Goldfrank D, Schoenberger E, Gilbert F. Disease genes and chromosomes: disease maps of the human genome. Chromosome 4. Genet Test. 2003; 7: 351–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rowton M, Ramos P, Anderson DM, et al Regulation of mesenchymal‐to‐epithelial transition by PARAXIS during somitogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2013; 242: 1332–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Papin J, Subramaniam S. Bioinformatics and cellular signaling. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2004; 15: 78–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sreedharan S, Almen MS, Carlini VP, et al The G protein coupled receptor Gpr153 shares common evolutionary origin with Gpr162 and is highly expressed in central regions including the thalamus, cerebellum and the arcuate nucleus. FEBS J. 2011; 278: 4881–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kehoe O, Kalia N, King S, et al Syndecan‐3 is selectively pro‐inflammatory in the joint and contributes to antigen‐induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014; 16: R148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Toyofuku T, Morimoto K, Sasawatari S, et al Leucine‐rich repeat kinase 1 regulates autophagy through turning on TBC1D2‐dependent Rab7 inactivation. Mol Cell Biol. 2015; 35: 3044–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Gilges D, Vinit MA, Callebaut I, et al Polydom: a secreted protein with pentraxin, complement control protein, epidermal growth factor and von Willebrand factor A domains. Biochem J. 2000; 352: 49–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Longatti A, Lamb CA, Razi M, et al TBC1D14 regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11‐ and ULK1‐positive recycling endosomes. J Cell Biol. 2012; 197: 659–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Mack NA, Whalley HJ, Castillo‐Lluva S, et al The diverse roles of Rac signaling in tumorigenesis. Cell Cycle. 2011; 10: 1571–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Carroll B, Mohd‐Naim N, Maximiano F, et al The TBC/RabGAP Armus coordinates Rac1 and Rab7 functions during autophagy. Dev Cell. 2013; 25: 15–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 Details of the selected core network genes in telocytes isolated from the mouse lung and cultured for 10 days in chromosome 4.

Figure S2 Details of the selected core network genes in telocytes isolated from the mouse lung and cultured for 5 days in chromosome 4.

Figure S3 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse mesenchymal stem cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S4 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse fibroblasts in chromosome 4.

Figure S5 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse alveolar type II cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S6 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse proximal airway cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S7 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse airway basal cells in chromosome 4.

Figure S8 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse CD8+ T cells come from bronchial lymph nodes in chromosome 4.

Figure S9 Details of the selected core network genes in mouse CD8+ T cells from lung in chromosome 4.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES