Abstract
A standardised physical examination based on four clinical signs was compared with the FEV1 with regard to ability to determine five-year mortality risk in subjects with varying degrees of obstructive airway disease. Both evaluation methods identified low, intermediate, and high risk groups within the population studied. Individuals with no positive physical signs, or with an FEV1 of 70% of predicted or more had mortality not significantly greater than that predicted on the basis of standard mortality tables. There was no difference between the FEV1 and the physical examination in ability to predict mortality.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- KORY R. C., CALLAHAN R., BOREN H. G., SYNER J. C. The Veterans Administration-Army cooperative study of pulmonary function. I. Clinical spirometry in normal men. Am J Med. 1961 Feb;30:243–258. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pardee N. E., Winterbauer R. H., Morgan E. H., Allen J. D., Olson D. E. Combinations of four physical signs as indicators of ventilatory abnormality in obstructive pulmonary syndromes. Chest. 1980 Mar;77(3):354–358. doi: 10.1378/chest.77.3.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renzetti A. D., Jr, McClement J. H., Litt B. D. The Veterans Administration cooperative study of pulmonary function. 3. Mortality in relation to respiratory function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Med. 1966 Jul;41(1):115–129. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(66)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]