Skip to main content
Acta Informatica Medica logoLink to Acta Informatica Medica
. 2015 Dec;23(6):352–355. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.352-355

Pachymetric Changes of the Cornea Amongst Patients Treated with LASIK

Afrim Shabani 1,, Minir Asani 1,2, Gazmend Kaçaniku 1, Valbon Ajazaj 1, Ermal Dida 1, Pajtim Lutaj 3
PMCID: PMC4720830  PMID: 26862244

Abstract

Purpose:

In this study, we have researched the possible parametrically changes before and after LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) and the influence of these changes in the cause of post LASIK ectasia.

Materials and methods:

In this study 204 eyes with different refractive anomalies were included. Candidates that underwent refractive surgery first have to undergo many ophthalmological examinations, firstly by evaluating their visual acuity, subjective and objective refraction with and without cycloplegia, slight lamp evaluation, computerized topography, pupillometry, retina examination and measurement of intraocular pressure. Pachymetric values were measured with Orbscan IIz (Bausch – Lomb). Refractive surgery was done with LASIK under local anesthesia.

Results:

In this study 102 patients were treated with LASIK who were with different refractive anomalies. According to the group age 44 or 43.1% were of the age 20 – 29, 46 or 45.1% were of the age 30 – 39, 11 or 10.8% were 40 – 49 years of age and 1 or 1% were above the age of 50 +. Pachymetric before surgery in right eye was approximately 565.4 µm (DS+- 39.4), from 507 µm up to 678 µm, but after surgery it was approximately 497.5 µm (DS+-61.7) from 346 µm up to 644 µm. Pachymetric on the left eye before surgery was approximately 564.8 µm (DS+-41.5) from 504 µm up to 696 µm but after surgery it was approximately 498.3 µm (DS+-62.2), from 329 µm up to 646 µm. Pachymetric in both eyes before surgery was approximately 549.1 µm (DS+=73.9), from 263 µm up to 687 µm. Pachymetric on both eyes after surgery was approximately 496.9 µm (DS+-60.1), from 337.5 µm up to 645 µm. With the “ Paired T – test “ we have reached a significant statistical change between the pachymetric values in both eyes before and after the surgery (P<0.0001).

Conclusion:

Corneal thickness is one of the main criteria in order to allow refractive surgeries, and as the main criteria it was evaluated at our patients treated with LASIK.

Keywords: Pachymetric, Orbscan IIz, LASIK

1. INTRODUCTION

Normal corneal thickness is about 540 microns. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photo refractive keratectomy (PRK) remain popular surgical procedures for the correction of myopia. Correcting vision by LASIK involves removal of corneal tissue. Therefore, the cornea is thinner after the procedure than before corneal thickness changes after LASIK.

Keratorefractive methods have to do with the evaluation of the radius of the curvature of the anterior surface of the cornea and from this most evaluate the central part of the optical zone and they determine the report between the anterior and the posterior surface of the cornea. Also we do have the evaluation of the corneal thickness (pachymetric). The cornea has an average value of the radius curvature which is approximately 7.8 mm. The cornea is not completely transparent, it bends around 10 % of the light rays mainly because of the dispersion from the stroma (1).

The light which in a certain angle falls in an optical medium partially goes through it, partially is absorbed and partial is reflected from the edges of the surface. Depending on the optical density of the two environments and the surface that divides them the report between these three light characteristics will be different. During the crossing of the light in a homogeneous environment it’s dispersed straight, but when crossing from one environment into another environment it will change its path, concretely the angle of direction will depend from the density of the optical medium. When crossing from a less dens optical environment into a more dens optical environment the light rays will bend normally meaning the angle of fall is higher than the angle of refraction. The report of the sinus angle of the fall angle and the refraction angle is called the refractive index (2).

When the laser beams initially meet with any surface four phenomena’s will happen: absorption, transmission, dispersion and reflection (3). Absorption and transmission are important for the cornea which depends on the wavelength of the laser beams. The action of the excimer laser can be used to remove small parts of the corneal tissue and do an effective remodeling of the cornea in order to achieve exact refractive changes. Excimer laser does its action under the control of a computer. Refractive surgery is a group of surgical procedures designed to reduce or eliminate the need for the use of glasses or contact lenses (4). The most frequent refractive procedure of the cornea is LASIK (5).

LASIK is a “lamellar” procedure in which photoablation and “excimer laser” are combined also intrastromal surgical technique by preserving the outer layer of the cornea. In its root “lamellar” refractive corneal surgery intends to displace to add or to modify the corneal stroma which changes the radius of the corneal curvature based on the given parameters. With LASIK a grave deal of refractive anomalies can be changed, also it can be used with other refractive techniques in order to treat grave ametropias (6).

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the study 102 patients are included or 204 eyes, the interventions are done in the German Eye Clinic in Prishtina. The possible candidates undergo many ophthalmic examinations by starting in evaluating the visual acuity, subjective and objective refraction with and without cycloplegia, slit lamp examinations, computerized topography, pupillometry, retina examinations, measuring the intraocular pressure. A detailed examination of all corneal layers is very important since any pathology in the cornea could be a contraindication for refractive surgery. The epithelium has to be intact, stroma has to be transparent also we have to be careful in examining the endothelium and the Descemet membrane.

The evaluation of corneal morphology is the moment when it’s decided whether a patient can undergo refractive surgery. The exact evaluation of central corneal thickness in order to set the limits up to which point stromal ablation, can be done in order to have a safe outcome of the eye. Here we are focused in three main elements which need to be evaluated: Flap thickness, depth of ablation and the residual stroma after ablation.

Pachymetric measurements were done with Orbscan IIz (Bausch – Lomb). In Orbscan we have a combined system of “slit – scanning” and the “Placido disc” (40 circles) to evaluate the “elevation” the anterior curvature and the “elevation” the posterior curvature of the cornea. With this we have the complete scheme of corneal pachymetric with the measurement “white to white”. We have to scan “slit lamps” at a 45 degree angle in the right and in the left side of the axis. 40 images are done from the system, 20 from each projector and all this in 0.7 sec. Also we do have a “tracking” system for involuntary patient movement. Keratometric values can be measured (3 and 5 mm from the center of the cornea) and the lowest pachymetric value. It can measure 9000 points in 1.5 sec (1). A photo of an Orbscan with a normal eye contains four parts: In the upper part it shows the anterior part of the cornea, upright the posterior surface of the cornea, left down the keratometric model and downright the pachymetric.

After dropping the eye with local anesthesia the eye is marked in the angels 0 and 180 degrees. The patient lies down in a horizontal position and a lid speculum is placed, the surface of the cornea and of the conjunctiva is cleaned, and the marking is done with a surgical sterile marker (gentian violet) in four points which serve for orientation once the repositioning of the flap is done. A successive, pneumatic LASIK ring is placed whose task is to hold the head of the Amadeus microkeratome (AMO< Irvine, CA, USA). After the vacuum is activated in the ring and before the cut with the microkeratome we have to verify that the intraocular pressure is raised (>65 mm/Hg), which is measured with the aplanative tonometer of Barraquer, then the microkeratome is activated, the creation of the flap is 140 microns thick.

Choosing the right size of the ring depends from the length values “white to white” and the keratomeric values by using the preoperative values measured with the Orbscan IIz and the ablations zone applied is 6.0 mm. The ring 8.5 mm is used when the length of “white to white” was 11.5 or smaller otherwise the ring of 9.5 mm was used. After the vacuum is stopped and the ring is removed the positioning of the flap is done in the opposite way and the drying of the stromal bed is done (7). Once we have verified once more that the refractive values and the laser calibration is correct that the positioning of the head is proper, the positioning of the cornea is perpendicular with the opening of the laser tube, the covering of the flap is done with the mask which is integrated in the computer system of the device then tracking of the system is activated. We can start the stromal ablation with the laser rays. After the effect of the laser rays the repositioning of the flap is done and the stromal bed is irrigated with BSS (balanced salt solution) with a syringe and a cannula where the flap is attached best possibly in its previous position. Finally the cornea is dried as best as possibly, we wait for 2 minutes and then we check once more to see whether the flap is placed correctly in its position. The eye is dropped with antibiotics and cortisone (monodose preservative free) and the lid speculum is removed. Every patient 15 minute after surgery is checked under the slit lamp for a possible flap decentration or complication. The presentation of data is done through tables. The processing of data is done with the statistical package InStat 3. From the statistical parameters there are calculated the index of the structure, the minimal and maximal value.

3. RESULTS

During the 3 year period 102 patients were analyzed (204 eyes) with different refractive anomalies (myopia, myopia with astigmatism, hyperopia, hyperopia with astigmatism, astigmatism).

In the study 102 patients are included who were treated with LASIK out of whom 56 or 54.9% were of female gender and 46 or 45.1% of male gender. With the “X2 - test” we did not gain a significant important statistical change with patients according to gender (X2 - test=0.98, P=0.322). According to the group age, 44 or 43.1% were of the age 20 - 29 years of age, 46 or 45.1%were 30 - 39 years of age, 11 or 10.8% were 40 – 49 years of age and 1 or 1.0% were 50 + years. According to the group age we noticed that women more often were of the age above 40 compared to men but men were more often of the age 20 - 29 years (Table 1).

Table 1.

Study according to the group age and gender

graphic file with name AIM-23-352-g001.jpg

In 102 patients included in this study 83 or 81.4% had myopia with astigmatism in the right eye, 11 or 10.8% had hyperopia with astigmatism, 6 or 5.9% had myopia and 2 or 2.0% had hyperopia. In 102 patients included in this study 79 or 77.5% had myopia with astigmatism in the left eye, 15 or 14.7% had hyperopia with astigmatism and 8 or 7.8% had myopia (Table 2).

Table 2.

Pathologies in the study according to the eyes

graphic file with name AIM-23-352-g002.jpg

Pachymetric in right eye before surgery in average was 565.4 mµ (DS+-39.4), from 507 µm up to 678 µm. Pachymetric in right eye after surgery in average was 497.5 µm (DS+-61.7), from 346 µm up to 644 µm. With the “paired T - test” we have gained a significant important statistical change between the values of pachymetric in the right eye before and after the surgery (P<0.0001), (Table 3).

Table 3.

Pachymetry in the right eye before and after surgery

graphic file with name AIM-23-352-g003.jpg

Pachymetric in the left eye before surgery in average was 564.8 µm (DS+-41.5), from 504 µm up to 696 µm. Pachymetric in the left eye after surgery in average was 498.3 µm (DS+-62.2), from 329 µm up to 646 µm. With the “ paired T - test” we gained a significant statistical change between the values of pachymetric in the left eye before and after the surgery (P<0.0001), (Table 4).

Table 4.

Pachymetry in the left eye before and after surgery

graphic file with name AIM-23-352-g004.jpg

Pachymetric in both eyes before surgery in average was 549.1 µm (DS+-73.9), from 263 µm up to 687 µm. Pachymetric in both eyes after surgery was in average 496.9 µm (DS+-60.1), from 337.5 µm up to 645 µm. With “paired T- test” we gained a significant statistical change between the pachymetric values in both eyes before and after the surgery (P<0.0001), (Table 5).

Table 5.

Pachymetry in both eyes before and after the surgery

graphic file with name AIM-23-352-g005.jpg

4. DISCUSSION

In our study we found out that mean pachymetric was 549.1 milimicrons (DS+-73.9), which does not correlate with gender. Similar results had Prasad et al (8) and Cho and Lam (9). They came to a conclusion that gender does play a role in corneal thickness.

In the aspect of refractive anomalies we noticed that the most common refractive anomaly was myopia with astigmatism (81.4% right eye and 77.5% left eye), then hyperopia with astigmatism and last myopia, hyperopia. We did not have any patient only with astigmatism.

Almost every day we come across new applications in the technology of refractive surgery especially in preoperative measurements, in the creation of the flap and in the action of laser rays itself. As a main goal we try to have accuracy in the results through a high energy with very short pulses (10).

Refractive interventions with thin cornea are considered as a possible cause in keratectasia post - LASIK. But in literature we notice that we do not have an increase of incidence with keratectasia post - LASIK amongst patients with a corneal pachymetric under 500 milimicrons but with a normal topography. Caster et al. (11) did not find any case with keratectasia at 109 eyes which preoperatively had a corneal thickness under 500 milimcrons. Also Tomita et al. (12) in a very long study of about 5 years postoperatively came to a conclusion that there is not much of a significant change in the pachymetric of the patients with a thin cornea even after a long period postoperatively just as with small postoperative refractive changes which check out with our study. With “Paired T-test” we got a significant statistical change in the pachymetrical values of both eyes before and after surgery (P<0.0001).

The corneal film creates the smooth outer layer of the corneal surface, which itself is almost rough. This smooth layer in the optical sense has a very important essential role in the refractive system of the eye. Also we do know that the corneal film is not constant all the time, after blinking the corneal film needs a few seconds to create the smooth layer in the surface of the cornea (13). In our study we had this consideration so we suggested the removal of contact lenses and the use of artificial eye drops before surgery in order not to have a break in the corneal film so this would not have any affect in the preoperative and postoperative results. Also we tried to notice every detail in this aspect and eventually we did not include any of these patients in our study who had a disorder in their corneal film.

In our study the topographic measurements are done with the Orbscan IIz and we now that the topographical measurements of the anterior and the posterior cornea are in the function of change. So a mistake in the measurement of the anterior corneal elevation will give us wrong results of corneal thickness. The measurement of the anterior corneal thickness is easier to measure therefore the mistakes happen more often in the measurement of the posterior corneal thickness. Topographically, a falsely thin CCT measurement can appear as a forward protrusion of the posterior corneal surface. This artifact generated by the Orbscan in post-LASIK eyes may be responsible for the finding in earlier studies that all corneas develop subclinical ectatic changes after LASIK (7).

5. CONCLUSION

Corneal thickness is one of the main reasons in order to allow refractive surgical intervention and as the main criteria it was evaluated at our patients treated with LASIK. The contraindication for LASIK are also the patients with corneal pachymetric under 500 milimicrons or a abnormal topography, where at this point its important to avoid ectasia pos LASIK.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: NONE DECLARED.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Agarawal A, Soosan J. Dr. Agarwal’s Textbook on Corneal Topography. Second Edition. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2010. pp. 3–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parunovic A, Cvetkovic D. Cvetkovic D, editor. Korekcija refrakcionih anomalija oka. Geometrijska optika. Zavod za udzbenike i nastavna sredstva. 1995:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buratto L, Slade S, Tavolato M. LASIK The evolution of refractive surgery. by SLACK Incorporated. 2012:3–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chu R. Should we abandon mechanical microkeratomes? EyeWorld. 2006;11(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sharma N, Sony P, Gupta A, Vajpayee R. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Jour Cataract Refract Surge. 2006;32:446–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yanoff M, Duker J. Second Edition. Mosby: Azar D. Refractive Surgery; 2004. Ophthalmology; pp. 123–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chiang ShY, Liang ChM, Chang ChJ. Accuracy and precision in producing LASIK flaps:A Comparasion of two microkeratomes. Jour Med Sci. 2007;27(1):9–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prasad A, Fry K, Hersh PS. Relationship of age and refraction to central corneal thickness. Cornea. 2011;30:553–555. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181fb880c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cho P, Lam C. Factors affecting the central corneal thickness of Hong Kong-Chinese. Curr Eye Res. 1999;18:368–374. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.18.5.368.5347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kymionis G. Corneal surgery and the femtosecond laser. Eurotimes. 2012;17(9):36. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Caster Al, Friess DW, Potvin RJ. Absence of keratectasia after LASIK in eyes with preoperative central corneal thickness of 450 to 500 microns. J Refract Surg. 2007 Oct;23(8):782–788. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20071001-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tomita M, Watabe M, Mita M. Long-term observation and evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted thin-flap laser in situ keratmileusis in eyes with thin corneas but normal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Feb;40(2):239–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, Frenschock O, Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med. 1990;10:463–468. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900100511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Informatica Medica are provided here courtesy of Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

RESOURCES