Abstract
There is growing alarm in the United States about an epidemiologically large occurrence of mild traumatic brain injury with serious long lasting consequences. Although conventional imaging has been unable to identify damage capable of explaining its organic origin or discerning patients at risk of developing long-term or permanently disabling neurological impairment, most disease models assume that diffuse axonal injury in white matter must be present but is difficult to resolve. The few histopathological investigations conducted, however, show only limited evidence of such damage, which cannot account for the stereotypical globalized nature of symptoms generally reported in patients. This review examines recent proposals that in addition to white matter, the thalamus may be another important further site of injury. Although its possible role still remains largely under-investigated, evidence from experimental human and animal models, as well as simulational and analytical representations of mild head injury and other related conditions, suggest that this strategically vital region of the brain, which has reciprocal projections to the entire cerebral cortex, could feasibly play an important role in understanding pathology and predicting outcome.
Key words: : concussion, experimental disease models, mild traumatic brain injury, pathophysiology, thalamus
Introduction
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) represents one of the most serious public health threats facing the United States in the 21st century.1 It is estimated to account for about 75% of the 1.5 million head trauma cases reported annually by hospital emergency departments, and costs more than $17 billion per year in health care utilization and lost productivity.2 The constellation of symptoms arising from a bump, blow, or jolt to the head in the absence of any skull fractures can include many persistent and disabling somatic (e.g., headaches, dizziness, insomnia, fatigue, blurred vision, sound and light sensitivity, and seizures), cognitive (e.g., attention, concentration, memory, and executive functioning deficits), and affective (e.g., irritability, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, problems with emotional control, and loss of initiative) sequelae.1–4 Unfortunately, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) fail to detect any evidence of brain damage that can account for the organic origin of these impairments or identify patients at risk of developing a long-term or permanently debilitating neurological condition.5
Nevertheless, most pathological models of mTBI currently assume diffuse axonal injury (DAI) must be present, which cannot be resolved using standard clinical imaging5 since it is a key feature in more severe forms of brain trauma5,6 DAI is the widespread presence of lesions throughout white matter tracts that are induced by rotational forces, which cause stress shearing in places where tissues of differing density interface.6 Although very few histopathological investigations of mTBI have been conducted, there is some clinical evidence to suggest it does cause structural damage to axons.7–11 These injuries, however, are strongly focalized and tend to cluster in regions such as the gray-white junction, the splenium of the corpus callosum, and the brain stem, and cannot account for the stereotypical globalized nature of symptoms commonly experienced by patients.5
One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that, in addition to white matter, the thalamus could perhaps be another important site of injury in mTBI.5,7–17 This deep gray matter structure is often described as the central relay station of the brain because it has reciprocal projections to the entire cerebral cortex, and plays a principal role in the processing and transmission of information between sensory, motor, and associative regions.18 These multiple functional pathways influence many global activities and therefore could potentially account for a great deal of the morbidity associated with mTBI. While the role that thalamic damage might play in mTBI has remained largely under-investigated, there is evidence to support the feasibility of its involvement.
Neuropathological Evidence
Ross and colleagues19 identified selective neuronal loss in the thalamic reticular nucleus of postmortem patients with severe brain trauma and noted that since this is a γ-aminobutyric acid population of cells which project only to other thalamic nuclei, the damage must have resulted from a mechanism not related to DAI, contusion, or vascular compromise. Interestingly, Gronwall20 previously suggested that the loss of reticular nucleus neurons may be associated with sustained attention deficits in mTBI. Anderson and colleagues7 reported that MRI volumetric analysis demonstrated that patients with moderate-to-severe brain trauma exhibited smaller thalamic volumes than patients with mild to moderate brain trauma, and patients with visible nonthalamic lesions were associated with smaller thalamic volumes than patients without visible lesions. These results were interpreted to imply that in the presence of cortical lesions, the thalamus may become susceptible to transneuronal degeneration. This understanding also is supported by Adams and colleagues,21 who observed that 80% of 35 patients in the vegetative state had thalamic irregularities attributed to DAI or ischemia, and Natale and colleagues,22 who presented an experimental mouse model of brain trauma that showed cortical damage could result in delayed remote thalamic neuronal apoptosis. Maxwell and colleagues23 used stereological techniques to investigate thalamic damage in patients with moderate and severe brain trauma who survived between 6 h and three years and found evidence of neuronal loss in the dorsal medial nucleus and ventral posterior nucleus. It was concluded that dorsal medial nucleus neuronal loss may form the basis for predicting the outcome of patients with moderate or severe brain trauma or patients in vegetative state. Evidence also was found to suggest an ongoing response to injury by thalamic neurons when post-traumatic survival was greater than four months.
Symptomatological Evidence
General
Abdel-Dayam and colleagues12 conducted a single photon emission CT study in which 77% of 228 patients with mild or moderate brain trauma were found to exhibit focal areas of hemodynamic impairment that included the thalamus and the basal ganglia (55.2%), the frontal lobes (23.8%), the temporal lobes (13%), the parietal lobes (3.7%), and the insular region and the occipital lobes (4.6%). The most common clinical complaints of patients (headaches, dizziness, and memory problems) were associated with greater numbers of focal areas in the thalamus and basal ganglia.
Headache
There is ample evidence to show that pain, such as the type associated with headaches experienced by patients with mTBI, is gated in the thalamus.24 More commonly, however, patient complaints closely resemble the prodromic symptoms in migraine which, by analogy, despite etiological and pathogenic differences, still suggest the potential involvement of the thalamus and thalamocortical circuits. Kobari and colleagues25 examined patients during spontaneously-occurring migraine using xenon enhanced CT and reported hemodynamic changes in the thalamus, the basal ganglia, and the cerebral cortex. Coppola and colleagues26 suggested, after studying high frequency oscillations of sensory evoked potentials in patients with migraine, that activity in thalamocortical projections is interictally decreased in migraine and could possibly explain the reduced pre-activation level of sensory cortices. Studies directed at understanding the relationship between migraine and vestibular symptoms (vertigo and sensitivity to sound and light) also have suggested that links between the thalamocortical processing centers, the vestibular nuclei, and the trigeminal system could provide the basis for a pathophysiological model of migraine-related vertigo.27
Insomnia
Loss of consciousness associated with mTBI can result in alterations of the sleep–wake cycle, especially insomnia. The cycle is controlled by neuronal systems contained in the thalamus, the hypothalamus, the brain stem, and the basal forebrain.28 The thalamus is the first relay station in which afferent information is blocked at sleep onset to prevent the cerebral cortex from receiving incoming peripheral stimuli. It also has been shown to play a primary role in the organization of the sleep–wake rhythm. This has been confirmed by experimental findings that athalamic cats display severe and persistent insomnia and clinical observations that thalamic degeneration with selective or prevalent involvement of the anterior nucleus or the dorsal medial nucleus results in virtually abolishing the ability of patients to generate an electroencephalographic sleep pattern. The thalamic midline and intralaminar nuclei receive impulses from the brain stem reticular formation and relay them to the ventral anterior nucleus from which projections ascend to the cortex. Since the reticular nucleus is traversed by fibers that connect the thalamus with the cerebral cortex, it is hypothesized to be the pacemaker responsible for synchronizing the activity of thalamic neurons and generating spindle rhythms during sleep.29
Fatigue
Central fatigue is a symptom common to several neurological diseases including mTBI. It represents a disorder in the performance of physical and mental tasks requiring self motivation and internal cueing and is attributed to a failure of the nonmotor output channels in the basal ganglia. The neurons of the basal ganglia are involved in higher order cognitive aspects of motor control and also influence many other functions through extensive connections with the association cortex and limbic structures. Interruption of the striatocortical fibers or a net change in the thalamic activity suppressing cortical activation via the striato-thalamo-cortical loop will predispose to fatigue. Since the thalamus is the final common pathway of the corticofugal projections from the basal ganglia, an increase in net thalamic inhibition or a shift in the reciprocal state of activation between the thalamus and the subthalamic nucleus will modify the cortical response to the basal ganglia input. Recent evidence supports this model since dysrhythmias in the thalamocortical loop are associated with disorders in which fatigue is common.30
Cognition
The relationship between the thalamus and cognitive function has been described with respect to several neurological conditions as well as, preliminarily, mTBI. Van der Werf and colleagues31 used experimental and established neuropsychological tests to study patients with thalamic infarction and demonstrated that the thalamus plays a crucial role in memory, executive functioning, and attention. Damage to several distinct thalamic areas, including the anterior nucleus, the dorsal medial nucleus, and the midline and intralaminar structures, were found to contribute to amnesia. Conversely, posterior and lateral lesions developed without memory impairment, showing a degree of functional specificity in the thalamus. Executive functioning deficits did not exhibit a strong association with restricted thalamic structures except for the ventral internal medullary lamina and the ventral dorsal medial nucleus. Attention and processing speed deficits were not associated with specific structures in the thalamus, suggesting that inattention is a general feature of thalamic diseases irrespective of where damage occurs. Salmond and colleagues32 reported that in patients with moderate-to-severe brain trauma MRI voxel based morphometry revealed reduced gray matter density in the thalamus, the hippocampal formation, the basal forebrain, and regions of the neocortex, which was consistent with deficits in sustained attention, associative learning, and reaction time. These results suggest that changes in the integrity of the central cholinergic system could account for the cognitive sequelae, which may be possible to ameliorate through pharmaceutical intervention. Wood and Bigler16 measured reduced thalamic volume in patients with mild, moderate, and severe brain trauma using MRI that correlated with sensory–perceptual errors. In line with these results, Fernández-Espejo and colleagues33 similarly detected lower thalamic volume in patients with severe brain trauma using MRI that, along with significant bilateral regional atrophy in the dorsal medial nucleus and the internal medullar lamina, was correlated with worse Disability Rating Scale scores. Ge and colleagues13 found that MRI perfusion imaging showed evidence of reduced cerebral blood flow in the thalamus of patients with mTBI almost two years after injury, which correlated with neurocognitive measures of impairment in executive functioning, memory, learning, processing speed, and response speed. Little and colleagues10 examined patients with mild and moderate-to-severe brain trauma using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and concluded that DAI had resulted in damage to thalamic projection fibers, as indicated by decreased fractional anisotropy (FA), a measure of uniformity in water molecule movement, which was correlated with neurocognitive measures for impairment in attention, executive functioning, and memory (Table 1). Messé and colleagues11 also investigated patients with mTBI using DTI at a mean of 17.2 d after injury and observed that damage to the anterior thalamic radiations, as indicated by decreased FA, was correlated with persistent post-concussion symptoms determined by a behavioral and cognitive assessment given three and four months later (Table 1). Grossman and colleagues applied DTI and diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) to patients with mTBI in both cross-sectional8 and longitudinal9 studies and detected evidence of thalamic damage within one month following injury and more than nine months following baseline, as indicated by decreased mean kurtosis, a measure of the diffusional complexity of water molecule movement, that was correlated with poor performance on neurocognitive measures for attention, concentration, and processing speed, as well as cognitive impairment (Table 1). While there is still no precise understanding of DKI in relationship to the underlying cellular environment, recent analytical and animal modeling investigations suggest these results reflect subtle precursory changes in axonal and myelin density34 or the presence of inflammation marked by reactive astrogliosis.35 This is consistent with what Ramlackhansingh and colleagues36 reported for patients with moderate-to-severe brain trauma who underwent positron emission tomography in which microglial-related inflammatory processes found in the thalamus were correlated with increased cognitive impairment even 17 years after injury. Squarcina and colleagues37 applied a novel method for assessing specific thalamocortical white matter connections in DTI and determined that in patients with mild, moderate-to-severe, and severe brain trauma, it yielded even greater evidence of damage than was recognized with standard probabilistic tractography used in previous investigations. Tang and colleagues14 identified a disrupted pattern of resting-state neuronal networks in patients with mTBI using functional MRI (fMRI) that indicated thalamocortical connectivity abnormalities, which were correlated with diminished neurocognitive functioning and clinical symptoms. Zhou and colleagues17 also found that patients with mTBI examined using fMRI exhibited a reduction in both the fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations for the thalamus and connectivity between thalamo-thalamo, thalamo-frontal, and thalamo-temporal regions during resting-state and task-related activities. Another related study, conducted by Tarapore and colleagues15 investigating patients with mild, moderate, and severe brain trauma using magnetic encephalography showed a reduction in connectivity for the right thalamus and bilateral frontal and parieto-temporo-occipital regions during resting state. In an interesting final study worth noting, Schiff and colleagues38 showed that deep-brain stimulation of the unspecific thalamocortical system through certain midline thalamic nuclei can produce an alerting effect in a minimally-conscious state patient with severe brain trauma. They interpreted these results as evidence that it is possible to compensate for loss of arousal regulation caused by chronic under activation of potentially recruitable large-scale networks normally controlled by the corticostriatopallidal-thalamocortical system. This raises the possibility that similar approaches might be useful in the treatment of patients with mTBI.
Table 1.
MRI diffusion measure | Attention (4)b | Concentration (2)b | Executive functioning (4)b | Memory (4)b | Psychomotor ability (2)b | Information processing (1)b | Cognitive impairment (2)b | Persistent PCS (1)b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA (4)c | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
MK (2)c | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Total number of papers assessing correlations (n=4; Grossman and colleagues,8,9 Little and colleagues,10 and Messe and colleagues11).
Total number of papers assessing correlations using indicated cognitive domain.
Total number of papers assessing correlations using indicated MRI diffusion measure.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mTBI, mild traumatic brain injury; PCS, post-concussion symptoms; FA, fractional anisotropy; MK, mean kurtosis.
Simulational and Analytical Evidence
King and colleagues39 examined brain displacement and deformation in mTBI under experimentally-controlled impact conditions using human cadaveric head and neck specimens, and reported that the strain rate and the product of strain and strain rate in the midbrain region at the vicinity of the thalamus were particularly good predictors for where significant tissue damage was likely to be observed. Both Zhang and colleagues40 and Vivano and colleagues41 investigated the susceptibility of different cerebral tissues to injury in mTBI using a finite element model of the human head and similarly concluded that the highest shear stress levels are localized to the midbrain region. Vivano and colleagues also noted that their findings were correlated with memory and cognitive dysfunction. Bayly and colleagues42 measured in vivo brain deformation in human volunteers undergoing mild posterior-anterior head deceleration while a series of MRI images with tissue tracking tag lines were obtained to estimate the strain tensor field during impact. It was observed that the brain continued to move when the skull decelerated but was constrained at the basal tethering region, which caused high shear strain fields on certain inner structures that included the thalamus. When the experiment was repeated using an angular acceleration for the head, shear strain fields were found to be mediated by similar factors and analogously increased in the region of the thalamus.43
Conclusions
In addition to anatomical and physiological considerations, there is evidence from forensic histology, advanced quantitative imaging, experimental animal modeling, as well as simulational and analytical methods to suggest that the thalamus might play a significant role in impairment caused by mTBI. Even so, few studies have presently been conducted to explore the susceptibility of this structure to damage and the degree to which it could potentially influence outcome.
To address these matters, it is necessary to determine whether in mTBI the thalamus is subject to primary injury caused by immediate direct traumatic insult or secondary injury caused by long-term indirect degenerative processes related to white matter. On the one hand, the findings reported by Bayly and colleagues,42,43 King and colleagues,39 Ross and colleagues,19 Vivano and colleagues,41 and Zhang and colleagues40 seem to support a primary injury model. On the other hand, the results described by Adams and colleagues,21 Anderson and colleagues,7 and Natale and colleagues22 appear to corroborate a secondary injury model. Perhaps, therefore, some combination of primary and secondary injury is at work since both these mechanisms do not necessarily have to be mutually exclusive. This is indeed what the diffusion imaging investigations carried out by Grossman and colleagues8,9 suggest, in which patients with mTBI demonstrated moderate correlations between measures for the thalamus, indicating primary injury, and between measures for the thalamus and total white matter, indicating secondary injury.
An understanding of the role played by thalamic damage in mTBI would be greatly improved if certain key experimental predictions could be tested. This, however, is made complicated by the fact that histopathology, considered the gold standard, is difficult to obtain since most patients do not die from such injury. One approach to addressing the matter, for example, might be to perform studies on non-human primates sacrificed to examine tissue samples from specific thalamic nuclei following various simulations of mild head injury accompanied by behavioral and psychophysics analysis.
Considering the strategically vital position of the thalamus to brain functioning and evidence pointing to its probable involvement in the pathophysiology of mTBI, there seems every reason to continue investigating these questions further and determine whether it can yield biomarkers helpful for early prediction of long-term or permanent brain damage and cognitive outcome.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Stewart Bloomfield of the State University of New York College of Optometry and Drs. Henry Rusinek and Edward Ziff of the New York University School of Medicine for their valuable insights and advice. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant numbers R01NS039135 and R01NS051623.
Author Disclosure Statement
Dr. Grossman has no competing financial interests to report. Dr. Inglese has received research grant support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and is a consultant for Vaccinex, but does not collect stocks or royalties from either of these companies and will not benefit financially from this publication.
References
- 1.Langlois J.A., Rutland-Brown W., and Wald M.M. (2006). The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 21, 375–378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2003). Report to Congress on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Steps to Prevent a Serious Public Health Problem. Centers for Disease Control and Injury Prevention: Atlanta, GA [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alexander M.P. (1995). Mild traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology 45, 1253–1260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kushner D. (1998). Mild traumatic brain injury: toward understanding manifestations and treatment. Arch. Intern. Med. 158, 1617–1624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grossman E.J., Inglese M., and Bammer R. (2010). Mild traumatic brain injury: is diffusion imaging ready for primetime in forensic medicine? Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 21, 379–386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Medana I.M. and Esiri M.M. (2003). Axonal damage: a key predictor of outcome in human CNS diseases. Brain 126, 515–530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anderson C.V., Wood D.M., Bigler E.D., and Blatter D.D. (1996). Lesion volume, injury severity, and thalamic integrity following head injury. J. Neurotrauma 13, 59–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grossman E.J., Ge Y., Jensen J.H., Babb J.S., Miles L., Reaume J., Silver J.M., Grossman R.I., and Inglese M. (2012). Thalamus and cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study. J. Neurotrauma 29, 2318–2327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grossman E.J., Jensen J.H., Babb J.S., Chen Q., Tabesh A., Fieremans E., Xia D., Inglese M., and Grossman R.I. (2013). Cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal diffusional kurtosis and perfusion imaging study. A.J.N.R. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34, 951–957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Little D.M., Kraus M.F., Joseph J., Geary E.K., Susmaras T., Zhou X.J., Pliskin N., and Gorelick P.B. (2010). Thalamic integrity underlies executive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. Neurology 74, 558–564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Messe A., Caplain S., Paradot G., Garrigue D., Mineo J.F., Soto Ares G., Ducreux D., Vignaud F., Rozec G., Desal H., Pelegrini-Issac M., Montreuil M., Benali H., and Lehericy S. (2011). Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter lesions at the subacute stage in mild traumatic brain injury with persistent neurobehavioral impairment. Human Brain Mapp. 32, 999–1011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abdel-Dayem H.M., Abu-Judeh H., Kumar M., Atay S., Naddaf S., El-Zeftawy H., and Luo J.Q. (1998). SPECT brain perfusion abnormalities in mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. Clin. Nucl. Med. 23, 309–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ge Y., Patel M.B., Chen Q., Grossman E.J., Zhang K., Miles L., Babb J.S., Reaume J., and Grossman R.I. (2009). Assessment of thalamic perfusion in patients with mild traumatic brain injury by true FISP arterial spin labelling MR imaging at 3T. Brain Inj. 23, 666–674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tang L., Ge Y., Sodickson D.K., Miles L., Zhou Y., Reaume J., and Grossman R.I. (2011). Thalamic resting-state functional networks: disruption in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology 260, 831–840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tarapore P.E., Findlay A.M., Lahue S.C., Lee H., Honma S.M., Mizuiri D., Luks T.L., Manley G.T., Nagarajan S.S., and Mukherjee P. (2013). Resting state magnetoencephalography functional connectivity in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 118, 1306–1316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wood D.M. and Bigler E.D. (1995). Diencephalic changes in traumatic brain injury: relationship to sensory perceptual function. Brain Res. Bull. 38, 545–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou Y., Lui Y.W., Zuo X.N., Milham M.P., Reaume J., Grossman R.I., and Ge Y. (2014). Characterization of thalamo-cortical association using amplitude and connectivity of functional MRI in mild traumatic brain injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 39, 1558–1568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sherman S.M. and Guillery R.W. (2009). Exploring the Thalamus and Its Role in Cortical Function, 2nd edition. The MIT Press: Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ross D.T., Graham D.I. and Adams J.H. (1993). Selective loss of neurons from the thalamic reticular nucleus following severe human head injury. J. Neurotrauma 10, 151–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gronwall D. (1989). Cumulative and persisting effects of concussion on attention and cognition. In: Mild Head Injury. Levin H.S. and Benton A. (eds). Oxford University Press: New York [Google Scholar]
- 21.Adams J.H., Jennett B., McLellan D.R., Murray L.S., and Graham D.I. (1999). The neuropathology of the vegetative state after head injury. J. Clin. Pathol. 52, 804–806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Natale J.E., Cheng Y., and Martin L.J. (2002). Thalamic neuron apoptosis emerges rapidly after cortical damage in immature mice. Neuroscience 112, 665–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maxwell W.L., Pennington K., MacKinnon M.A., Smith D.H., McIntosh T.K., Wilson J.T., and Graham D.I. (2004). Differential responses in three thalamic nuclei in moderately disabled, severely disabled and vegetative patients after blunt head injury. Brain 127, 2470–2478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kuner R. (2010). Central mechanisms of pathological pain. Nat. Med. 16, 1258–1266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kobari M., Meyer J.S., Ichijo M., Imai A., and Oravez W.T. (1989). Hyperperfusion of cerebral cortex, thalamus and basal ganglia during spontaneously occurring migraine headaches. Headache 29, 282–289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coppola G., Vandenheede M., Di Clemente, L., Ambrosini A., Fumal A., De Pasqua V., and Schoenen J. (2005). Somatosensory evoked high-frequency oscillations reflecting thalamo-cortical activity are decreased in migraine patients between attacks. Brain 128, 98–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Furman J.M., Marcus D.A., and Balaban C.D. (2003). Migrainous vertigo: development of a pathogenetic model and structured diagnostic interview. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 16, 5–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Culebras A. (1992). Neuroanatomic and neurologic correlates of sleep disturbances. Neurology 42, 19–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jurko M.F., Andy O.J., and Webster C.L. (1971). Disordered sleep pattern following thalamotomy. Clin. Electroencephalogr. 2, 213–217 [Google Scholar]
- 30.McCormick D.A. (1999). Are thalamocortical rhythms the Rosetta Stone of a subset of neurological disorders? Nat. Med. 5, 1349–1351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Van der Werf Y.D., Witter M.P., Uylings H.B., and Jolles J. (2000). Neuropsychology of infarctions in the thalamus: a review. Neuropsychologia 38, 613–627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salmond C.H., Chatfield D.A., Menon D.K., Pickard J.D., and Sahakian B.J. (2005). Cognitive sequelae of head injury: involvement of basal forebrain and associated structures. Brain 128, 189–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fernandez-Espejo D., Junque C., Bernabeu M., Roig-Rovira T., Vendrell P., and Mercader J.M. (2010). Reductions of thalamic volume and regional shape changes in the vegetative and the minimally conscious states. J. Neurotrauma 27, 1187–1193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fieremans E., Jensen J.H., and Helpern J.A. (2011). White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage 58, 177–188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhuo J., Xu S., Proctor J.L., Mullins R.J., Simon J.Z., Fiskum G., and Gullapalli R.P. (2012). Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 59, 467–477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ramlackhansingh A.F., Brooks D.J., Greenwood R.J., Bose S.K., Turkheimer F.E., Kinnunen K.M., Gentleman S., Heckemann R.A., Gunanayagam K., Gelosa G., and Sharp D.J. (2011). Inflammation after trauma: microglial activation and traumatic brain injury. Ann. Neurol. 70, 374–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Squarcina L., Bertoldo A., Ham T.E., Heckemann R., and Sharp D.J. (2012). A robust method for investigating thalamic white matter tracts after traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 63, 779–788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schiff N.D., Giacino J.T., Kalmar K., Victor J.D., Baker K., Gerber M., Fritz B., Eisenberg B., Biondi T., O'Connor J., Kobylarz E.J., Farris S., Machado A., McCagg C., Plum F., Fins J.J., and Rezai A.R. (2007). Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature 448, 600–603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.King A.I., Yang K.H., Zhang L., and Hardy W. (2003). Biomechanics of Ligaments: From Molecular Biology to Joint Function. In: Frontiers in Biomedical Engineering. Hwang N.H.C., Woo S.Y. (eds). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang L., Yang K.H., and King A.I. (2004). A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 126, 226–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Viano D.C., Casson I.R., Pellman E.J., Zhang L., King A.I., and Yang K.H. (2005). Concussion in professional football: brain responses by finite element analysis: part 9. Neurosurgery 57, 891–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bayly P.V., Cohen T.S., Leister E.P., Ajo D., Leuthardt E.C., and Genin G.M. (2005). Deformation of the human brain induced by mild acceleration. J. Neurotrauma 22, 845–856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sabet A.A., Christoforou E., Zatlin B., Genin G.M., and Bayly P.V. (2008). Deformation of the human brain induced by mild angular head acceleration. J. Biomech. 41, 307–315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]