Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2016 Jan 1;21:192–202. doi: 10.2741/4384

Nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated protein quality control in cardiomyocytes

Taixing Cui 1, Yimu Lai 1, Joseph S Janicki 1, Xuejun Wang 2
PMCID: PMC4723105  NIHMSID: NIHMS751564  PMID: 26709769

Abstract

Protein quality control (PQC) acts to minimize the level and toxicity of malfolded proteins in the cell. It is performed by an elaborate network of molecular chaperones and targeted protein degradation pathways. PQC monitors and maintains protein homeostasis or proteostasis in the cells. Whilst chaperones may actively promote refolding of malfolded proteins, the malfolded proteins which cannot be correctly refolded are degraded by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagic-lysosome pathway (ALP). The UPS degrades individual misfolded protein molecules, whereas the ALP removes large and less soluble protein aggregates and organelles. Emerging evidence indicates that dysregulated and inadequate PQC play an important role in the pathogenesis of not only classic conformational disease but more common forms of cardiac pathology such as cardiac pathological hypertrophy and heart failure. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a master transcription factor of cellular defense, appears to regulate the USP and the ALP by directly controlling the expression of UPS- and ALP- related genes. This article highlights an emerging role of Nrf2 in the regulation of intracellular PQC as well as its potential involvement in cardiac pathology.

Keywords: Nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2, autophagy, proteasome, protein quality control

2. INTRODUCTION

Normal function of proteins is essential for virtually every aspect of life. A cellular protein exerts its normal functions only when it is in its native conformation, a 3-dimensional structure with the polypeptide chain properly folded. Therefore, it is important for a polypeptide to attain and maintain its native conformation. The native conformation that a protein acquires during its biogenesis is attained through folding of the polypeptide chain spontaneously or with the help of molecular chaperones (1). However, the biogenesis of native proteins is not a very efficient process because studies have shown that approximately one third of newly synthesized polypeptides never make to mature proteins; they are co-translationally degraded presumably due to errors in translation and/or folding (2). Genetic defects and environmental stress can disrupt proper folding of a protein and even cause unfolding and misfolding of already properly folded proteins in the cell (3). It has been recently suggested that misfolded and unfolded proteins be collectively referred to as “malfolded proteins” (4). As misfolded proteins or more accurately malfolded proteins can be highly toxic if they are left unattended, the cell has developed multi-layered mechanisms to constantly monitor the level of malfolded proteins, to keep the level low, and to minimize the toxicity of malfolded proteins. These mechanisms are referred to as protein quality control (PQC) (5). PQC is carried out by an elaborate network of molecular chaperones and protein degradation pathways. The precise mechanism by which the cell distinguishes a terminally misfolded protein is unclear; however, the misfolded proteins are targeted for degradation by two proteolytic pathways: the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagic-lysosome pathway (ALP) (Figure 1) (6, 7).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A Scheme of protein quality control in the cell. Chaperones aid folding nascent polypeptides, unfolding misfolded proteins and refolding them, and channeling terminally misfolded proteins for degradation by the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) or chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). When escaped from targeted degradation, misfolded proteins form aggregates via hydrophobic interactions. Aggregated proteins can be selectively targeted by macroautophagy to, and degraded by, the lysosome. (Adopted from Figure 1 of Wang et al. (5), with permission.)

UPS-mediated protein degradation consists generally of two main steps: (a) covalent attachment of a chain of ubiquitin (Ub) protein molecules to a target protein molecule via a process known as ubiquitination and (b) degradation of the ubiquitinated protein molecule by the 26S proteasome. Hence, the UPS degrades proteins in a highly selective fashion. Soluble misfolded proteins in the cell are primarily degraded by the UPS. (6, 8). Ub is the first and best studied modifier protein that can be covalently linked to other proteins via an isopeptide bond. Ubiquitination is accomplished via a series of chemical reactions catalyzed sequentially by the Ub-activating enzyme (E1), Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and Ub ligases (E3). In addition to targeting proteins for degradation, ubiquitination, both mono- and poly-ubiquitination, regulates a variety of cellular functions via a non-proteolytic fate. The proteasome which is found in both cytoplasm and the nucleus is an ATP-dependent multi-subunits protein complex with its protease activity residing in the core particle (the 20S proteasome). Proteasome subunit expression and proteasome assembly appear to be regulated by metabolic stresses although the precise underlying mechanism of the regulation remains obscure. The vast majority of normal proteins in the cell when they become no longer needed are also degraded by the UPS. Hence, the UPS plays pivotal role in controlling both quality and quantity of cellular proteins, thereby touching virtually every corner of the cell. Therefore, it is not surprising that dysregulation of UPS components and the overall UPS-proteolytic function has been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous human diseases including a large subset of cardiovascular diseases. For example, proteasome functional insufficiency is implicated in the majority of failing human hearts and has been experimentally demonstrated to be a major pathogenic factor in not only cardiac conformational disease but ischemia-reperfusion injury (7, 9, 10). Hence, it is important to better understand how the UPS, especially proteasome function, is regulated in cardiac health and disease.

Autophagy (Greek for “self-eating”) is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that targets cytoplasmic contents (e.g., protein aggregates and organelles) to the lysosome for degradation; it was coined by Belgian biochemist Christian de Duve based on his discovery of lysosomes (11-13). Autophagy has been classified into three different types depending on the means by which the target is delivered into lysosomes for final degradation: (a) macroautophagy that is mediated by formation of double-membrane bound vesicles termed the autophagosome which engulfs a portion of cytoplasm or cytoplasmic organelles and delivers its content to lysosomes by fusion with the lysosome; (b) microautophagy by which the cytosolic materials is directly engulfed and internalized by lysosomes; (c) chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) that involves the direct translocation of cytosolic proteins across the lysosomal membrane by chaperone proteins (14). Both macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) and CMA may participate in PQC-associated protein degradation, with removal of protein aggregates or defective organelles by the former and individual malfolded proteins by the latter (Figure 1) (5, 14). Dysregulation in the ALP has been linked to a variety of human diseases, including infectious diseases, Crohn’s disease, neurodegenerative diseases, pancreatitis, diabetes, cancer, myopathy, and cardiovascular diseases (7, 12, 15). Furthermore, emerging evidence suggest that pharmacological intervention of the ALP pathway may represent a new therapeutic strategy to treat many forms of common and precipitating diseases, such as cancer, liver disease, neurodegenerative diseases, and heart diseases (16-18).

The UPS and the ALP may function distinctly but they appear to take the responsibility of degrading misfolded proteins in PQC in a complementary manner. It is generally accepted that for the purpose of PQC, the UPS degrades soluble misfolded or damaged proteins before they form aggregates, whereas the ALP clears large and less soluble or insoluble protein aggregates or defective organelles such as damaged mitochondria. Moreover, UPS impairment results in compensatory activation of autophagy for clearing damaged proteins (19-21), whereas autophagy malfunction may impair UPS performance (22, 23). The function and regulation of the UPS and the ALP as well as their interplay in cardiac diseases have been recently reviewed (1, 5, 7). Herein we will summarize the latest literature regarding an emerging role of Nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) in the regulation of intracellular PQC as well as its potential involvement in cardiac pathology.

3. NRF2 IN THE UPS

Nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a member of the Cap ‘n’ Collar (CNC) family of basic leucine zipper (bZip) transcription factor (24-27). There are also two additional Nrf proteins: Nrf1 and Nrf3. Nrf1-3 proteins are ubiquitously expressed, with each showing distinct but overlapping expression profiles. Nrf2 is the most studied. Activity of Nrf2 is mainly regulated by its interaction with an inhibitory protein called Keap1. Keap1 contains two known protein-interacting domains: the bric-a-brac, tramtrack, broad-complex domain (BTB domain) in the N terminal region, and the Kelch repeats in the C-terminal region homologous to Drosophila actin-binding protein Kelch (Kelch repeat, double glycine repeat (DGR) domain). Keap1 binds Nrf2 through its C-terminal Kelch domain, which contains six copies of the evolutionarily conserved kelch repeat sequence motif. BTB mediates homodimerization and binding of Keap1 to Cullin (Cul) 3, a scaffold protein of Nrf2 Ub ligase (E3). Thus, Keap1 acts as a substrate adaptor to bring Nrf2 into the Ub E3 complex. RING box protein 1 recruits the catalytic function of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) by binding to Cul3 C terminal region. E2 catalyzes polyubiquitination of Nrf2 protein on the lysine residues of the Neh2 domain. As a result, Nrf2 is ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Under basal conditions, Nrf2 is rapidly degraded by the UPS, which affords Nrf2 a half-life of only 20 minutes, resulting in a low protein level of Nrf2 in various types of cells.

Nrf2 forms a heterodimer with its obligator partner Maf, thereby binding to a cis-acting enhancer sequence known as the antioxidant response element (ARE) with a core nucleotide sequence of 5-RTGACNNNGC-3 to control the basal and inducible expression of more than 200 genes that can be grouped into several categories including antioxidant genes, phase II detoxifying enzymes, transcriptional factors, transporters, scavenger receptors, and chaperone proteins (24-27). Thus the functions of Nrf2 spread rather broadly from antioxidant defense to cell cycle regulation and PQC. A critical role of Nrf2 in the control of a battery of antioxidant and detoxifying genes such as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione-S-transferases (GST), NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO-1), NQO2, γ-glutamylcysteine synthase (γ-GCS), and glucuronosyltransferas (UGT), has been well established in diverse cell types (24-27); however, the specificity and functional significance of Nrf2-mediated expression of the other genes remain to be further studied.

It is worthy to note that Nrf1 is crucial in liver erythropoiesis, whereas the role of Nrf3 is unclear (28). One critical evolutionary divergence is that Nrf1 functions independently of Keap1 and is targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is markedly different than the subcellular localization of Nrf2 (29). While the Nrf2 subcellular targeting might specifically aid in protection against ER stress (30), the Nrf2-driven antioxidants seem to be essential for liver development (31). It has been proposed that Nrf3 may be a negative regulator of Nrf2 by interfering with ARE-mediated transcription (32); however, the physiological relevance remains to be elucidated.

Importantly, several studies have revealed that Nrf2 is capable of upregulating a group of proteasome genes (Table 1) (33-36). Microarray analysis has shown that 19 genes coding for 19S and 20S proteasome subunits are Nrf2-dependently upregulated by dithiolethione 3-H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione (D3T) in liver tissue (33, 34). However, the basal expression of the proteasome subunit genes including proteasome alpha-subunit (PSMA)1, PSMA4, proteasome beta-subunit (PSMB)3, PSMB5, PSMB6, PSMB8, (proteasome 26S subunit ATPase 1) PSMC1, PSMC3, and PSMD14 (proteasome 26S subunit non-ATPase 14) may be independent of Nrf2 in normal mouse liver or embryonic fibroblasts (33). In addition, the Nrf2-dependent upregulation of 20S subunits such as PSMB5 is most likely dependent on the nature of Nrf2-activating small molecules because Nrf2-driven transcriptional activity was activated by sulforaphane (SFN) and D3T but not by butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) (33). Consistent with its induction of proteasome synthesis, Nrf2 inducer SFN was recently shown to increase proteasomal peptidase activities and proteolytic function in not only cell cultures but also intact mice, promoting the degradation of mutant Huntingtin and reducing its cytotoxicity (37). Nrf2 is also essential for H2O2-induced increases in proteasomal activity and upregulation of 20S subunit PSMB1 and 11S subunit PSME1 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (36). In human colon cancer cells, however, Nrf2 is an essential mediator for both basal and inducible expression of PSMD4 and PSMA5 and the Nrf2-dependent PSMD4 and PSMA5 expression confers protection against apoptosis (35). These results indicate that there are hitherto unappreciated factors that are required for the stimuli- and cell type-dependent Nrf2-mediated upregulation of proteasome genes. A recent study showed that Nrf2 plays a key role in self-renewal and pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells partly via proteasome maturation protein (POMP)-mediated maintenance and regulation of proteasome activity (38). Collectively, these results suggest that Nrf2 appears to play an important role in PQC through a positive regulation of proteasome expression, thereby maintaining proteostasis in the cells. Nevertheless, the role of the Nrf2-proteasome axis in the heart remains to be investigated. Notably, the related Nrf1 also appears to be able to regulate the transcription of proteasome genes in mammalian cells (39-41); several studies have demonstrated that Nrf1meidates the expression of proteasome subunits during proteasome rebound and recovery after proteasome inhibition (41, 42). It will be important to sort out how Nrf1 and Nrf2 work together to regulate proteasome expression and proteasome function.

Table 1.

The list of proteasome subunits upregulated by Nrf2

Proteasomes Proteasome Subunits Tissues or Cells REFERENCES
19S PSMC1, PSMC3, PSMD1, PSMD5, PSMD7, PSMD11,
PSMD12, PSMD13, PSMD14
Mouse liver (33)
PSMD4 Human colon cancer cells (35)
20S PSMA1, PSMA4, PSMA5, PSMA6, PSMB1, PSMB2,
PSMB3, PSMB4, PSMB5, PSMB6
Mouse liver (33)
PSMB5 MEFs (33)
PSMB1 MEFs (36)
PSMA5 Human colon cancer cells (35)
11S (None) Mouse liver (33)
PA28αβ/PSME1 MEFs (36)
Immuno-proteasome (None) Mouse liver (33)
β1i/PSMB9/LAMP2? MEFs (36)
Others POMP Human embryonic stem cells (38)

MEFs, mouse embryonic fibroblasts

4. NRF2 IN AUTOPHAGY

Nrf2 appears to be involved in the regulation of protein aggregation in autophagic substrate selection (43) as well as autophagy per se (44-47). Although it remains unclear whether the observed increased steady state levels of autophagosomes in Nrf2-deficient breast cancer cells, endothelial cells, and airway epithelial cells are caused by an impairment of autophagosome clearance (44, 46, 47), it has been demonstrated that Nrf2 is a critical mediator of autophagic clearance of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in macrophages (45). In addition, a recent study showed that Nrf2 is capable of clearing phosphorylated tau by induction of nuclear dot protein 52 (NDP52), an autophagy adaptor protein (also known as CALCOCO2) in the presence of autophagy stimulator thereby potentially contributing to brain protection (48). Given the well-documented protective role of Nrf2 signaling (26, 27) and the ALP pathway (49, 50) in diverse pathological settings, it is likely that Nrf2 may act as a modulator to ALP-mediated cellular defense.

On the other hand, the functional integrity of the ALP may have great impact on biological and pathophysiological consequences of Nrf2 activation. In this context, there is a complex interplay between Keap-Nrf2 and autophagy pathways. For example, the phosphorylation of the autophagy-adaptor protein p62 increases p62 binding affinity for Keap1 thus activating Nrf2 and the persistent activation of Nrf2 through accumulation of phosphorylated p62 contributes to the growth of human hepatocellular carcinomas (51). While Keap1 is constitutively degraded through the ALP, autophagic deficiency leads to p62 accumulation which disrupts the Keap1-Nrf2 association and provokes Nrf2 stabilization and accumulation, resulting in liver damage (52). This Nrf2-mediated liver damage is, however, independent of p62 (52). Interestingly, defective proteasome function in the liver leads to damage associated with the activation of autophagy and Nrf2, in which Nrf2 activation serves as a physiological adaption (21). These results suggest that Nrf2 activation is cytoprotective when autophagy function is intact, whereas it becomes detrimental if autophagy is impaired. However, the precise underlying mechanisms remain to be defined.

5. NRF2-MEDIATED PQC IN CARDIOMYOCYTES

Despite the increasing evidence that Nrf2 is capable of regulating PQC in the cells aforementioned, a link between Nrf2-mediated PQC and cardiac function has not been reported until recently. Wang et al. have recently demonstrated Nrf2-mediated clearance of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in the heart (53, 54). Consistent with previous observations that Nrf2 deficiency leads to an earlier onset of cardiac pathological remodeling and the subsequent development of heart failure in response to hemodynamic overload or pharmacologically induced cardiac stress (55, 56), Wang et al. found that the cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of Nrf2 suppressed myocardial oxidative stress as well as cardiac apoptosis, fibrosis, hypertrophy, and dysfunction in a setting of sustained pressure overload produced by transverse aortic constriction (53). Interestingly, the constitutive activation of Nrf2 increased the steady level of autophagosomes while decreasing ubiquitinated protein levels and ubiquitin-positive protein aggregates in the pressure overloaded heart. Nrf2 gene gain- and loss-of-function approaches revealed that Nrf2 enhances autophagosome formation and autophagic flux in cultured cardiomyocytes. Unexpectedly, while Nrf2 minimally regulated apoptosis, it significantly suppressed the proteotoxic necrosis of cardiomyocytes. Moreover, Nrf2 attenuated the proteocytotoxicity presumably via enhancing autophagy-mediated clearance of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in cardiomyocytes. Therefore, cardiac-specific activation of Nrf2 suppresses cardiac maladaptive remodeling and dysfunction most likely by enhancing autophagic clearance of toxic protein aggregates in the heart. Since the pressure overload-induced cardiac dysfunction has been situated in the category of proteinopathies (57), these results have not only demonstrated that Nrf2 is a critical regulator of myocardial PQC but also argue against the previous claim that a sustained activation of Nrf2 in the heart is harmful due to the reductive stress (58, 59). More recently, Li et al. have also demonstrated that Nrf2 is capable of ameliorating doxorubicin-induced impairment of autophagic flux and accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates, and suppressing doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in cardiomyocytes (54). These results suggest that Nrf2 has an enormous impact on cardiac PQC under stress conditions, which may contribute to its protection against cardiac adverse remodeling and dysfunction.

In the past 15 years, a missense (R120G) mutation of alpha B-crystallin (CryABR120G), a bona fide misfolded protein linked to human disease (60), has been extensively used to study cardiac cytosolic PQC (10, 20, 61-65). Inadequate PQC, as manifested by UPS and ALP functional insufficiency (10, 20, 61, 62, 65), has been experimentally demonstrated to play a major pathogenic role in CryABR120G-induced cardiomyopathy in both cardiomyocyte cultures and transgenic mice (7). Notably, a reductive stress hypothesis had been proposed by Rajasekaran and colleague to explain pertubed PQC and resultant cardiac pathology caused by increased expresion of a misfolded cytosolic chaperone protein, based on their studies on a transgenic mouse model of cardiac overexpression of a human CryABR120G (hCryABR120G) (66). More recently, they suggest that sustained Nrf2 activation mediates this reductive stress because they observed that ubiquitous knockout of Nrf2 prevented reductive stress and attenuated aberrant protein aggregation, accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, and pathological cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure in the aged hCryABR120G transgenic mice (59). The authors proposed that Nrf2-mediated reductive stress is the contributing mechanism for hCryABR120G-induced cardiomyopathy. It should be pointed out that the murine CryABR120G (mCryABR120G) used earlier by Wang et al. and the hCryABR120G used later by Rajasekaran et al. have virtually identical amino acid sequences because CryAB is one of the exquisitely conserved proteins between mice and humans (64, 66). Hence, here we propose an alternative model which takes the findings by Kannan et al. into consideration along with most, if not all, other important findings from studying a similar mCryABR120G mouse model. First, although both proteasome activity and macroautophagy are adaptively upregulated in CryABR120G overexpressing hearts (62, 67), these upregulations are inadequate and both proteasome functional insufficiency and ALP insufficiency have been demonstrated to play an essential role in mCryABR120G-based cardiomyopathy (10, 65). Second, the ALP insufficiency can in turn impede the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by proteasome via accumulation of an ALP substrate protein p62 (22, 23). Third, in both cultured cardiomyocytes and intact mouse hearts, expression of mCryABR120G led to significant increases in both the mRNA and protein levels of p62, which in turn promotes aggresome formation (20); although it is unclear whether the increased p62 transcription is mediated by Nrf2, Nrf2 activation is capable of driving p62 expression and thereby leads to hepatotoxicity in autophagy deficient liver aforementioned (52). Hence, in aged hCryABR120G transgenic mouse hearts which are likely with ALP insufficiency, a constitutive activation of Nrf2-mediated p62 expression may result in the accumulation of p62-protein aggregate complexes, which, in turn, compromises myocardial UPS performance in the setting of autophagy impairment in the heart as recently reported (22). Lastly, as described earlier, cardiomyocyte-specific Nrf2 transgenic mice displayed normal cardiac function as well as cardiac protective phenotype (53), arguing against the notion that the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant signalling causes pathogenic reductive stress. Therefore, it is very possible that the rescue effect of Nrf2 knockout on the aged hCryABR120G transgenic mice be mediated by p62 down-regulation and improvement of UPS performance, not necessarily requiring diminution of reductive stress.

Taken together, it is apparent that the contribution of Nrf2-mediated regulation of both the UPS and autophagy to its cardioprotective effects has not been well established; the precise mechanism by which Nrf2 regulates cardiac PQC also needs to be further investigated.

6. A SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Protein quality control (PQC) is a tightly-controlled orchestra of multiple proteins in multiple pathways that ultimately serve to ensure proteostasis in cells. The UPS and the ALP degradation are the two major pathways for clearing damaged proteins in the cell. The substrate selection of the UPS is largely specified by Ub E3’s; however, the mechanism determining the specificity for substrate selection of autophagy is not well understood. Moreover, the precise mechanism by which the UPS and the ALP interact in clearing damaged proteins remains to be unveiled. In this context, Nrf2 appears to be a novel regulator of the UPS and the ALP (Figure 2). While the UPS downregulates Nrf2 activity by Keap1-mediated degradation of Nrf2, the ALP seems to increase Nrf2 activity via autophagic clearance of Keap1. In contrast, Nrf2 is capable of augmenting both USP and ALP activities via the upregulation of subunits of proteasome and autophagy adaptor protein NDP52. The Nrf2-driven NDP52 in selectively facilitating degradation of phosphorylated tau via autophagy highlights a potential role of Nrf2 in activating selectively autophagic clearance of target proteins by upregulating NDP52.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A hypothesis for Nrf2-mediated PQC in the heart. Nrf2 is constitutively degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) by Keap1-mediated ubiquitination, while Keap1 is degraded by the autophagic-lysosome pathway (APL). Upon external or internal stresses which interrupt Keap1-mediated Nrf2 degradation, Nrf2 is released from Keap1-Nrf2 complex and newly synthesized Nrf2 is accumulated thereby triggering nuclear translocation of Nrf2 to activate its downstream genes, such as PSMB5 and NDP52. As a result, the UPS and the ALP are enhanced for clearing malfolded proteins in the cardiomyocytes.

Because of the wealth of evidence that has accumulated showing that Nrf2 is the major regulator of cellular defense against various pathological stresses in different organs including lungs, liver, gastrointestinal tract, bladder, kidneys, brain, skin, ovary, and the heart, Nrf2 has evolved to be an attractive drug target for the treatment or prevention of human diseases (26). Of note, Nrf2 is downregulated in at least a subset of human failing hearts (68); however, inappropriate activation of Nrf2 may cause heart failure in a setting of diabetes in humans (69). Given the emerging role of Nrf2 in coordinating the UPS and the ALP, further investigation of Nrf2-operated signaling in orchestrating the PQC by the UPS and the ALP in a variety of proteinopathies will not only provide novel insights into understanding the nature of USP and/or APL in the PQC involved in human disease, but also unveil the molecular mechanisms underlying controversial observations of Nrf2-mediated seemingly opposing actions associated with dysregulated UPS and/or ALP functions. Importantly, there are a large number of different Nrf2 activators in the pipelines for drug development (70, 71); the outcome will pave the way for developing a new class of drugs for the treatment of human disease including heart failure.

7. REFERENCES

  • 1.Wang C, Wang X. The interplay between autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system in cardiac proteotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(2):188–194. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.bbadis.2014.0.7.0.2.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schubert U, Anton LC, Gibbs J, Norbury CC, Yewdell JW, Bennink JR. Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature. 2000;404(6779):770–4. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/35008096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sontag EM, Vonk WI, Frydman J. Sorting out the trash: the spatial nature of eukaryotic protein quality control. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;26:139–46. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.ceb.2013.1.2.0.0.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balch WE, Sznajder JI, Budinger S, Finley D, Laposky AD, Cuervo AM, Benjamin IJ, Barreiro E, Morimoto RI, Postow L, Weissman AM, Gail D, Banks-Schlegel S, Croxton T, Gan W. Malfolded protein structure and proteostasis in lung diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(1):96–103. doi: 10.1.1.6.4/rccm.201306-1164WS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang X, Pattison JS, Su H. Posttranslational modification and quality control. Circ Res. 2013;112(2):367–81. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/CIRCRESAHA.112.2.6.8.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amm I, Sommer T, Wolf DH. Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitinproteasome system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843(1):182–96. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.bbamcr.2013.0.6.0.3.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang X, Robbins J. Proteasomal and lysosomal protein degradation and heart disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;71:16–24. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.yjmcc.2013.1.1.0.0.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dantuma NP, Lindsten K. Stressing the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;85(2):263–71. doi: 10.1.0.9.3/cvr/cvp255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li J, Powell SR, Wang X. Enhancement of proteasome function by PA28α overexpression protects against oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2011;25(3):883–93. doi: 10.1.0.9.6/fj.10-160895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li J, Horak KM, Su H, Sanbe A, Robbins J, Wang X. Enhancement of proteasomal function protects against cardiac proteinopathy and ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(9):3689–700. doi: 10.1.1.7.2/JCI45709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Duve C. (Introduction to the physiopathology of the lysosomes) Brux Med. 1966;46(46):1087–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ravikumar B, Sarkar S, Davies JE, Futter M, Garcia-Arencibia M, Green-Thompson ZW, Jimenez-Sanchez M, Korolchuk VI, Lichtenberg M, Luo S, Massey DC, Menzies FM, Moreau K, Narayanan U, Renna M, Siddiqi FH, Underwood BR, Winslow AR, Rubinsztein DC. Regulation of mammalian autophagy in physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(4):1383–435. doi: 10.1.1.5.2/physrev.00030.2.0.0.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stolz A, Ernst A, Dikic I. Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(6):495–501. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/ncb2979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a unique way to enter the lysosome world. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22(8):407–17. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.tcb.2012.0.5.0.0.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Willis MS, Townley-Tilson WH, Kang EY, Homeister JW, Patterson C. Sent to destroy: the ubiquitin proteasome system regulates cell signaling and protein quality control in cardiovascular development and disease. Circ Res. 2010;106(3):463–78. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/CIRCRESAHA.109.2.0.8.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thorburn A, Thamm DH, Gustafson DL. Autophagy and cancer therapy. Mol Pharmacol. 2014;85(6):830–8. doi: 10.1.1.2.4/mol.114.0.9.1.850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang J, Carra S, Zhu WG, Kampinga HH. The regulation of the autophagic network and its implications for human disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(10):1121–33. doi: 10.7.1.5.0/ijbs.6666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nemchenko A, Chiong M, Turer A, Lavandero S, Hill JA. Autophagy as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51(4):584–93. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.yjmcc.2011.0.6.0.1.0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zheng Q, Su H, Tian Z, Wang X. Proteasome malfunction activates macroautophagy in the heart. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;1(3):214–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zheng Q, Su H, Ranek MJ, Wang X. Autophagy and p62 in cardiac proteinopathy. Circ Res. 2011;109(3):296–308. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/CIRCRESAHA.111.2.4.4.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kageyama S, Sou YS, Uemura T, Kametaka S, Saito T, Ishimura R, Kouno T, Bedford L, Mayer RJ, Lee MS, Yamamoto M, Waguri S, Tanaka K, Komatsu M. Proteasome dysfunction activates autophagy and the keap1-nrf2 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(36):24944–55. doi: 10.1.0.7.4/jbc.M114.5.8.0.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tian Z, Wang C, Hu C, Tian Y, Liu J, Wang X. Autophagic-lysosomal inhibition compromises ubiquitin-proteasome system performance in a p62 dependent manner in cardiomyocytes. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100715. doi: 10.1.3.7.1/journal.pone.0100715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Korolchuk VI, Mansilla A, Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC. Autophagy inhibition compromises degradation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway substrates. Mol Cell. 2009;33(4):517–27. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.molcel.2009.0.1.0.2.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kobayashi M, Yamamoto M. Molecular mechanisms activating the Nrf2-Keap1 pathway of antioxidant gene regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005;7(3-4):385–94. doi: 10.1.0.8.9/ars.2005.7.3.8.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, Biswal S. Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007;47:89–116. doi: 10.1.1.4.6/annurev.pharmtox.46.1.2.0.604.1.4.1.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li J, Ichikawa T, Janicki JS, Cui T. Targeting the Nrf2 pathway against cardiovascular disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2009;13(7):785–94. doi: 10.1.5.1.7/14728220903025762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suzuki T, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. Toward clinical application of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(6):340–6. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.tips.2013.0.4.0.0.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maher J, Yamamoto M. The rise of antioxidant signaling--the evolution and hormetic actions of Nrf2. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;244(1):4–15. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.taap.2010.0.1.0.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y, Crouch DH, Yamamoto M, Hayes JD. Negative regulation of the Nrf1 transcription factor by its N-terminal domain is independent of Keap1: Nrf1, but not Nrf2, is targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem J. 2006;399(3):373–85. doi: 10.1.0.4.2/BJ20060725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang W, Chan JY. Nrf1 is targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by an N-terminal transmembrane domain. Inhibition of nuclear translocation and transacting function. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(28):19676–87. doi: 10.1.0.7.4/jbc.M602802200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu Z, Chen L, Leung L, Yen TS, Lee C, Chan JY. Liver-specific inactivation of the Nrf1 gene in adult mouse leads to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatic neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(11):4120–5. doi: 10.1.0.7.3/pnas.0500660102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sankaranarayanan K, Jaiswal AK. Nrf3 negatively regulates antioxidant-response element-mediated expression and antioxidant induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1 gene. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(49):50810–7. doi: 10.1.0.7.4/jbc.M404984200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kwak MK, Wakabayashi N, Greenlaw JL, Yamamoto M, Kensler TW. Antioxidants enhance mammalian proteasome expression through the Keap1-Nrf2 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(23):8786–94. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.23.8786-8794.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kwak MK, Wakabayashi N, Itoh K, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M, Kensler TW. Modulation of gene expression by cancer chemopreventive dithiolethiones through the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Identification of novel gene clusters for cell survival. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(10):8135–45. doi: 10.1.0.7.4/jbc.M211898200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Arlt A, Bauer I, Schafmayer C, Tepel J, Muerkoster SS, Brosch M, Roder C, Kalthoff H, Hampe J, Moyer MP, Folsch UR, Schafer H. Increased proteasome subunit protein expression and proteasome activity in colon cancer relate to an enhanced activation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) Oncogene. 2009;28(45):3983–96. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/onc.2009.2.6.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pickering AM, Linder RA, Zhang H, Forman HJ, Davies KJ. Nrf2-dependent induction of proteasome and Pa28alphabeta regulator are required for adaptation to oxidative stress. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(13):10021–31. doi: 10.1.0.7.4/jbc.M111.2.7.7.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y, Hettinger CL, Zhang D, Rezvani K, Wang X, Wang H. Sulforaphane enhances proteasomal and autophagic activities in mice and is a potential therapeutic reagent for Huntington's disease. J Neurochem. 2014;129(3):539–47. doi: 10.1.1.1.1/jnc.12647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jang J, Wang Y, Kim HS, Lalli MA, Kosik KS. Nrf2, a regulator of the proteasome, controls self-renewal and pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32(10):2616–25. doi: 10.1.0.0.2/stem.1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsuchiya Y, Taniguchi H, Ito Y, Morita T, Karim MR, Ohtake N, Fukagai K, Ito T, Okamuro S, Iemura S, Natsume T, Nishida E, Kobayashi A. The casein kinase 2-nrf1 axis controls the clearance of ubiquitinated proteins by regulating proteasome gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(17):3461–72. doi: 10.1.1.2.8/MCB.01271-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang Y, Nicholatos J, Dreier JR, Ricoult SJ, Widenmaier SB, Hotamisligil GS, Kwiatkowski DJ, Manning BD. Coordinated regulation of protein synthesis and degradation by mTORC1. Nature. 2014;513(7518):440–3. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/nature13492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Radhakrishnan SK, Lee CS, Young P, Beskow A, Chan JY, Deshaies RJ. Transcription factor Nrf1 mediates the proteasome recovery pathway after proteasome inhibition in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2010;38(1):17–28. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.molcel.2010.0.2.0.2.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sha Z, Goldberg AL. Proteasome-mediated processing of Nrf1 is essential for coordinate induction of all proteasome subunits and p97. Curr Biol. 2014;24(14):1573–83. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.cub.2014.0.6.0.0.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Riley BE, Kaiser SE, Shaler TA, Ng AC, Hara T, Hipp MS, Lage K, Xavier RJ, Ryu KY, Taguchi K, Yamamoto M, Tanaka K, Mizushima N, Komatsu M, Kopito RR. Ubiquitin accumulation in autophagy-deficient mice is dependent on the Nrf2-mediated stress response pathway: a potential role for protein aggregation in autophagic substrate selection. J Cell Biol. 2010;191(3):537–52. doi: 10.1.0.8.3/jcb.201005012. doi:jcb.201005012 (pii) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rao VA, Klein SR, Bonar SJ, Zielonka J, Mizuno N, Dickey JS, Keller PW, Joseph J, Kalyanaraman B, Shacter E. The antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2 negatively regulates autophagy and growth arrest induced by the anticancer redox agent mitoquinone. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(45):34447–59. doi: 10.1.0.7.4/jbc.M110.1.3.3.579. doi:M110.1.3.3.579 (pii) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fujita K, Maeda D, Xiao Q, Srinivasula SM. Nrf2-mediated induction of p62 controls Toll-like receptor-4-driven aggresome-like induced structure formation and autophagic degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(4):1427–32. doi: 10.1.0.7.3/pnas.1014156108. doi:1014156108 (pii) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mattart L, Calay D, Simon D, Roebroek L, Caesens-Koenig L, Van Steenbrugge M, Tevel V, Michiels C, Arnould T, Boudjeltia KZ, Raes M. The peroxynitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine activates Nrf2 and the UPR leading to a cytoprotective response in endothelial cells. Cell Signal. 2012;24(1):199–213. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.cellsig.2011.0.9.0.0.2. doi:S0898-6568(11)00281-6 (pii) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhu L, Barrett EC, Xu Y, Liu Z, Manoharan A, Chen Y. Regulation of Cigarette Smoke (CS)-Induced Autophagy by Nrf2. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e55695. doi: 10.1.3.7.1/journal.pone.0055695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 48.Jo C, Gundemir S, Pritchard S, Jin YN, Rahman I, Johnson GV. Nrf2 reduces levels of phosphorylated tau protein by inducing autophagy adaptor protein NDP52. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3496. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/ncomms4496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kroemer G, Marino G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Mol Cell. 2010;40(2):280–93. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.molcel.2010.0.9.0.2.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Filomeni G, De Zio D, Cecconi F. Oxidative stress and autophagy: the clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell Death Differ. 2014 doi: 10.1.0.3.8/cdd.2014.1.5.0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ichimura Y, Waguri S, Sou YS, Kageyama S, Hasegawa J, Ishimura R, Saito T, Yang Y, Kouno T, Fukutomi T, Hoshii T, Hirao A, Takagi K, Mizushima T, Motohashi H, Lee MS, Yoshimori T, Tanaka K, Yamamoto M, Komatsu M. Phosphorylation of p62 activates the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway during selective autophagy. Mol Cell. 2013;51(5):618–31. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.molcel.2013.0.8.0.0.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Taguchi K, Fujikawa N, Komatsu M, Ishii T, Unno M, Akaike T, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. Keap1 degradation by autophagy for the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(34):13561–6. doi: 10.1.0.7.3/pnas.1121572109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang W, Li S, Wang H, Li B, Shao L, Lai Y, Horvath G, Wang Q, Yamamoto M, Janicki JS, Wang XL, Tang D, Cui T. Nrf2 enhances myocardial clearance of toxic ubiquitinated proteins. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;72:305–15. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.yjmcc.2014.0.4.0.0.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li S, Wang W, Niu T, Wang H, Li B, Shao L, Lai Y, Li H, Janicki JS, Wang XL, Tang D, Cui T. Nrf2 deficiency exaggerates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and cardiac dysfunction. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:748524. doi: 10.1.1.5.5/2014/748524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li J, Ichikawa T, Villacorta L, Janicki JS, Brower GL, Yamamoto M, Cui T. Nrf2 protects against maladaptive cardiac responses to hemodynamic stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(11):1843–50. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/ATVBAHA.109.1.8.9.480. doi:ATVBAHA.109.1.8.9.480 (pii) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li J, Zhang C, Xing Y, Janicki JS, Yamamoto M, Wang XL, Tang DQ, Cui T. Up-regulation of p27(kip1) contributes to Nrf2-mediated protection against angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;90(2):315–24. doi: 10.1.0.9.3/cvr/cvr010. doi:cvr010 (pii) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tannous P, Zhu H, Nemchenko A, Berry JM, Johnstone JL, Shelton JM, Miller FJ, Jr., Rothermel BA, Hill JA. Intracellular protein aggregation is a proximal trigger of cardiomyocyte autophagy. Circulation. 2008;117(24):3070–8. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.7.6.3.870. doi:CIRCULATIONAHA.107.7.6.3.870 (pii) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rajasekaran NS, Varadharaj S, Khanderao GD, Davidson CJ, Kannan S, Firpo MA, Zweier JL, Benjamin IJ. Sustained activation of nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2/antioxidant response element signaling promotes reductive stress in the human mutant protein aggregation cardiomyopathy in mice. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(6):957–71. doi: 10.1.0.8.9/ars.2010.3.5.8.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kannan S, Muthusamy VR, Whitehead KJ, Wang L, Gomes AV, Litwin SE, Kensler TW, Abel ED, Hoidal JR, Rajasekaran NS. Nrf2 deficiency prevents reductive stress-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;100(1):63–73. doi: 10.1.0.9.3/cvr/cvt150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vicart P, Caron A, Guicheney P, Li Z, Prevost MC, Faure A, Chateau D, Chapon F, Tome F, Dupret JM, Paulin D, Fardeau M. A missense mutation in the alphaB-crystallin chaperone gene causes a desmin-related myopathy. Nat Genet. 1998;20(1):92–5. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gupta MK, Gulick J, Liu R, Wang X, Molkentin JD, Robbins J. Sumo E2 enzyme UBC9 is required for efficient protein quality control in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2014;115(8):721–9. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/CIRCRESAHA.115.3.0.4.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen Q, Liu JB, Horak KM, Zheng H, Kumarapeli AR, Li J, Li F, Gerdes AM, Wawrousek EF, Wang X. Intrasarcoplasmic amyloidosis impairs proteolytic function of proteasomes in cardiomyocytes by compromising substrate uptake. Circ Res. 2005;97(10):1018–26. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/01.RES.0000189262.9.2.8.96.0.b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang X, Klevitsky R, Huang W, Glasford J, Li F, Robbins J. AlphaB-crystallin modulates protein aggregation of abnormal desmin. Circ Res. 2003;93(10):998–1005. doi: 10.1.1.6.1/01.RES.0000102401.7.7.7.12.ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang X, Osinska H, Klevitsky R, Gerdes AM, Nieman M, Lorenz J, Hewett T, Robbins J. Expression of R120G-alphaB-crystallin causes aberrant desmin and alphaB-crystallin aggregation and cardiomyopathy in mice. Circ Res. 2001;89(1):84–91. doi: 10.1161/hh1301.092688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bhuiyan MS, Pattison JS, Osinska H, James J, Gulick J, McLendon PM, Hill JA, Sadoshima J, Robbins J. Enhanced autophagy ameliorates cardiac proteinopathy. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(12):5284–97. doi: 10.1.1.7.2/JCI70877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rajasekaran NS, Connell P, Christians ES, Yan LJ, Taylor RP, Orosz A, Zhang XQ, Stevenson TJ, Peshock RM, Leopold JA, Barry WH, Loscalzo J, Odelberg SJ, Benjamin IJ. Human alpha B-crystallin mutation causes oxido-reductive stress and protein aggregation cardiomyopathy in mice. Cell. 2007;130(3):427–39. doi: 10.1.0.1.6/j.cell.2007.0.6.0.4.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tannous P, Zhu H, Johnstone JL, Shelton JM, Rajasekaran NS, Benjamin IJ, Nguyen L, Gerard RD, Levine B, Rothermel BA, Hill JA. Autophagy is an adaptive response in desmin-related cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(28):9745–50. doi: 10.1.0.7.3/pnas.0706802105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tan Y, Ichikawa T, Li J, Si Q, Yang H, Chen X, Goldblatt CS, Meyer CJ, Li X, Cai L, Cui T. Diabetic downregulation of Nrf2 activity via ERK contributes to oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance in cardiac cells in vitro and in vivo. Diabetes. 2011;60(2):625–33. doi: 10.2.3.3.7/db10-1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.de Zeeuw D, Akizawa T, Audhya P, Bakris GL, Chin M, Christ-Schmidt H, Goldsberry A, Houser M, Krauth M, Lambers Heerspink HJ, McMurray JJ, Meyer CJ, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Toto RD, Vaziri ND, Wanner C, Wittes J, Wrolstad D, Chertow GM, Investigators BT. Bardoxolone methyl in type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(26):2492–503. doi: 10.1.0.5.6/NEJMoa1306033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liby KT, Yore MM, Sporn MB. Triterpenoids and rexinoids as multifunctional agents for the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(5):357–69. doi: 10.1.0.3.8/nrc2129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kumar H, Kim IS, More SV, Kim BW, Choi DK. Natural product-derived pharmacological modulators of Nrf2/ARE pathway for chronic diseases. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31(1):109–39. doi: 10.1.0.3.9/c3np70065h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES