Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine the spatiotemporal expression of caudal-type homeobox genes (CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4) during development of the midgut in human embryos and to explore the possible roles of CDX genes during the morphogenesis of human midgut. Human embryos (n=28) were sectioned serially and sagittally and CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were detected on the midline from the 5th to 9th weeks of gestation by immunohistochemical staining. Results: CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were weakly expressed in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut in the 6th and 7th weeks of gestation and reached estimated optimal level on the 8th and 9th weeks of gestation. In the 9th week of gestation, immunoreactivities specific to CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 were restricted in epithelium of the midgut. Conclusions: CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins began to express in human midgut in the 6th week of gestation. From the 6th to 9th week of gastation, the expression of CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins gradually increase and exhibited overlapping expression patterns, suggesting that CDX genes may be involved in early development of the epithelium of human midgut. Cross-regulatory interactions may exist among CDX genes with respect to human midgut development.
Keywords: Human, embryo, CDX, midgut, development
Introduction
The Drosophila gene Caudal (Cad) has three mammalian homologues: CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 in human and Cdx1, Cdx2 and Cdx4 in mouse. Caudal-type homeobox (Cdx) genes show highly-restricted expression patterns at the onset of gastrulation, suggesting their involvement in the formation of the digestive tract [1-3]. In vitro and in vivo studies of Cdx1 and Cdx2 suggest that these transcription factors are important in the early differentiation and maintenance of the intestinal epithelial cell [4]. In previous studies, we have shown that Cdx1, Cdx2 and Cdx4 exhibit overlapping expression patterns in hindgut of rat embryos [5-7]. Our earlier study showed that CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were constantly expressed during hindgut and anorectum development and exhibited overlapping expression patterns in the cloaca/hindgut, suggesting that these genes may play important roles in the morphogenesis of the human hindgut and anorectum [5-7]. However, the expression patterns of CDX genes have not been investigated in relation to the embryogenesis of human midgut. As a framework for understanding their roles, a detailed understanding of the expression patterns of CDX proteins during development is necessary. Thus, we conducted a systematic study of the expression of CDX proteins in the developing midgut of normal human embryos, with special emphasis on embryonic stages from the 5th to 9th weeks of generation.
Methods and methods
Sample preparation
The study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the China Medical University Ethics Committee (No. 200 (7) PS14). Embryos were obtained, with written informed consent, from women with no history of hereditary disease who were undergoing elective terminations of unplanned pregnancies. 28 phenotypically normal human embryos from the 5th to 9th weeks of gestation were obtained from chemically-induced/atraumatic curettage pregnancy terminations (Table 1). The embryos were washed immediately in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and then fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 24 h. The samples were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned sagittally at a thickness of 4 μm.
Table 1.
Distribution of embryos at different ages
| Gestational age (weeks) | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of embryos | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 28 |
Immunohistochemical staining
Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation in 3% H2O2 for 20 min. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating the slides in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 98°C for 10 min. The sections were treated and incubated with primary rabbit polyclonal anti-CDX1 antibody [LSBio/LS-C180091/48877 (1:200)], primary mouse monoclonal anti-CDX2 antibody [LSBio/LS-B4299/38994 (1:50)] or primary rabbit polyclonal anti-CDX4 antibody [LSBio/LS-C30413/51929 (1:200)], and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Antibody incubations were performed in PBS supplemented with 10% goat serum. Primary antibodies were incubated with sections at 4°C for 16 h and incubation with secondary antibody was performed for 20 min at room temperature. The immunoreactions were visualized using 3,3P-diaminobenzidine (Sigma, UK) as a chromogen. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Negative controls were performed by either omitting the primary or secondary antibodies or incubating with the equivalent concentrations of nonimmune antiserum.
Fromowitz’s scoring [8] was used to assess the staining of CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4: (i) 0, no coloured stain; 1, light-yellow stain; 2, yellow-brown stain; 3, brown or dark brown stain; (ii) 0, area of positive staining < 5%; 1, the positive stained area constituted 5%-24%; 2, the positive stained area constituted 25%-49%; 3, the positive stained area constituted 50%-74%; 4, area of positive staining > 75%. Sum scores (score (i) + score (ii)) < 3 were considered weakly positive (±), 3-5 points were considered positive (+), and > 5 was considered strongly positive (++).
Results
In embryos at the 5th week of gestation, immunoreactivities specific to CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 were not detected in epithelium or mesenchyme of the midgut (Figures 1, 2 and 3).
Figure 1.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 5th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX1 was not detected (-) in the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). Bar 1000 μm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 2.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 5th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX2 was not detected (-) in the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). Bar 1000 μm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 3.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 5th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX4 was not detected (-) in the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). Bar 1000 μm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
During the 6th and 7th weeks of gestation, CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were weakly expressed in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (Figures 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9).
Figure 4.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 6th week of gestation (A), CDX1 proteins were weakly expressed (±) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 1000 μm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 5.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 6th week of gestation (A), CDX2 proteins were weakly expressed (±) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 1000 μm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 6.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 6th week of gestation (A), CDX4 proteins were weakly expressed (±) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 1000 μm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 7.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 7th week of gestation (A), CDX1 proteins were weakly expressed (±) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 8.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 7th week of gestation (A), CDX2 proteins were weakly expressed (±) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 9.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 7th week of gestation (A), CDX4 proteins were weakly expressed (±) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
During the 8th week of gestation, immunoreactivities specific to CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 were obviously detected in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut. CDX1 protein expressed in epithelium of the midgut was more obviously than CDX2 and CDX4 (Figures 10, 11 and 12).
Figure 10.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 8th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX1 were obviously detected (++) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). CDX1 protein expressed in epithelium of the midgut was more obviously than CDX2 and CDX4. Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 11.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 8th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX2 were detected (+) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 12.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 8th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX4 were detected (+) in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). The red dots point out positive stained area. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
During the 9th week of gestation, immunoreactivities specific to CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 were obviously detected in epithelium of the midgut. CDX1 protein was extensively and strongly expressed in duodenal epithelium but CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were only selectively expressed in duodenal epithelium (Figures 13, 14 and 15).
Figure 13.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 9th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX1 were detected (+) in epithelium of the midgut (B). CDX1 protein was extensively and strongly expressed (++) in duodenal epithelium (C). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). Green rectangle in a is shown at higher magnification in (C). The red dots point out positive stained area. The red arrows point out part of positive cells. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 14.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 9th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX2 were detected (+) in epithelium of the midgut (B). CDX2 proteins were only selectively expressed (+) in duodenal epithelium (B). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). Green rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (C). The red dots point out positive stained area. The red arrows point out part of positive cells. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
Figure 15.

Sagittal section of an embryo on the 9th week of gestation (A), immunoreactivities specific to CDX4 were detected (+) in epithelium of the midgut (B). CDX4 proteins were only selectively expressed (+) in duodenal epithelium (C). Red rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (B). Green rectangle in (A) is shown at higher magnification in (C). The red dots point out positive stained area. The red arrows point out part of positive cells. Bar 2 mm (A); Bar 100 μm (B).
The patterns of CDX protein expression are given in Table 2.
Table 2.
Expression patterns of CDX proteins in human midgut
| Midgut | 5 w | 6 w | 7 w | 8 w | 9 w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDX1 | - | E ± | E ± | E +~++ | E +~++ |
| M ± | M ± | M + | |||
| CDX2 | - | E ± | E ± | E + | E + |
| M ± | M ± | M + | |||
| CDX4 | - | E ± | E ± | E + | E + |
| M ± | M ± | M + |
E: Epithelium; M: mesenchyme.
Discussion
Direct comparison of CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins expression patterns during development as performed in this study provides new insights into their potential functional roles. The current study showed that CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were expressed in a spatiotemporal pattern during human midgut morphogenesis from the 6th to 9th weeks of gestation. First, CDX proteins showed time-dependent changes in expression. The CDX proteins expression gradually increased and reached estimated optimal level on the 8th and 9th weeks of gestation. Furthermore, CDX proteins showed space-dependent expression patterns. CDX proteins were expressed in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut from the 6th to 8th weeks. In the 9th week, immunoreactivities specific to CDX proteins were restricted in epithelium of the midgut. These suggest that CDX genes may contribute to early development of human midgut.
CDX genes may be involved in early development of the epithelium of human midgut. In this study, we showed that CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins were constantly active in epithelium of the midgut from the 6th to 9th weeks. The homeodomain transcription factors Cdx1 and Cdx2 are expressed in the intestinal epithelium from early development, with expression persisting throughout the life of the animal. The effect of Cdx2 on gut morphogenesis is profound. Cdx1 and Cdx2 exhibit transcriptional specificity in the intestine [4], and Cdx2 has been shown to be critical for the expression of signaling molecules, epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and intestinal proliferation patterns [9,10]. Cdx2+/- embryos exhibited multiple polyps in the cecum and adjacent ileum and proximal colon (that is, in the midgut) [11,12]. By contrast, little is known about the role of Cdx4 in patterning the endoderm. Cdx4 maintains posterior endodermal identity [13]. These indicate that CDX genes may be involved in early development of epithelium of human midgut.
Cdx1, Cdx2 and Cdx4 were shown to exhibit overlapping expression patterns in the posterior embryo in animal models, and had related functions regarding their roles in patterning of the paraxial mesoderm [14-19]. In previous studies, we have shown that Cdx1, Cdx2 and Cdx4 exhibit overlapping expression patterns in hindgut of rat embryos [5-7]. CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins also showed overlapping expression pattern during human midgut development. From the 6th to 8th weeks, CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins showed restricted overlapping expression pattern in epithelium and mesenchyme of the midgut. In the 9th week, CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins showed overlapping expression pattern in epithelium of the midgut. This overlapping expression and activity of CDX proteins indicate that cross-regulatory interactions may exist among CDX genes with respect to human midgut development. Cdx1 was significantly reduced in Cdx2-deficiency mice intestine [9]. Cdx4 expression is significantly down regulated in Cdx2-/- mutants and lost in the Cdx1/2 DKO mutants [20]. Combined Cdx1 -/-/Cdx2 +/- mutants have an axial phenotype showing abnormalities greater than either mutant separately [18]. Cdx4-null mutants appear morphologically normal and Cdx4 function is only apparent in the context of compound mutant backgrounds. Cdx2 +/- mice and Cdx4 -/- mice showed no intestinal malformation, whereas Cdx2 +/- Cdx4 -/- compound mice showed cloacal septation and anorectal defects [21,22]. These results suggest cross-regulatory interactions may exist among Cdx genes with respect to midgut development. The relative expression of CDX proteins may be important in the anterior to posterior patterning of the intestinal epithelium and in defining patterns of proliferation and differentiation.
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins began to express in human midgut in the 6th week of gestation. The expression of CDX1, CDX2 and CDX4 proteins gradually increase from the 6th to 9th week of gastation and exhibited overlapping expression patterns. These suggest that CDX genes may play a pivotal role in the morphogenesis of human midgut. Cross-regulatory interactions may exist among CDX genes with respect to human midgut development. Continued research on CDX genes might reveal a further contribution to the development of human gut.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81170578) and supported by the Outstanding Scientific Fund of Shengjing Hospital (grant No. m850).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992;68:283–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Silberg DG, Swain GP, Suh ER, Traber PG. Cdx1 and Cdx2 expression during intestinal development. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:961–971. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.18142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bonner CA, Loftus SK, Wasmuth JJ. Isolation, characterization, and precise physical localization of human CDX1, a caudal-type homeobox gene. Genomics. 1995;28:206–211. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grainger S, Hryniuk A, Lohnes D. Cdx1 and Cdx2 Exhibit Transcriptional Specificity in the Intestine. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang T, Bai YZ, Zhang D, Zhang SW, Wang DJ, Jia HM, Yuan ZW, Wang WL. Temporal and spatial expression of caudal-type homeobox gene-1 in the development of anorectal malformations in rat embryos. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1568–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tang XB, Zhang T, Wang WL, Yuan ZW, Bai YZ. Temporal and spatial expression of caudaltype homeobox gene-2 during hindgut development in rat embryos with ethylenethioureainduced anorectal malformations. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;357:83–90. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-1858-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tang XB, Zhang J, Wang WL, Yuan ZW, Bai YZ. Spatiotemporal expression of Cdx4 in the developing anorectum of rat embryos with Ethylenethiourea Induced anorectal malformations. Cells Tissues Organs. 2014;199:212–220. doi: 10.1159/000365965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shimizu M, Saitoh Y, Itoh H. Immunohistochemical staining of Ha-ras oncogene product in normal, benign, and malignant human pancreatic tissues. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:607–612. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gao N, White P, Kaestner KH. Establishment of intestinal identity and epithelial-mesenchymal signaling by Cdx2. Dev Cell. 2009;16:588–599. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Grainger S, Savory JG, Lohnes D. Cdx2 regulates patterning of the intestinal epithelium. Dev Biol. 2010;339:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chawengsaksophak K, James R, Hammond VE, Köntgen F, Beck F. Homeosis and intestinal tumours in Cdx2 mutant mice. Nature. 1997;386:84–87. doi: 10.1038/386084a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tamai Y, Nakajima R, Ishikawa T, Takaku K, Seldin MF, Taketo MM. Colonic hamartoma development by anomolous duplication in Cdx2 knockout mice. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2965–2970. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kinkel MD, Eames SC, Alonzo MR, Prince VE. Cdx4 is required in the endoderm to localize the pancreas and limit beta-cell number. Development. 2008;135:919–929. doi: 10.1242/dev.010660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beck F. Homeobox genes in gut development. Gut. 2002;51:450–454. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.3.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Beck F. The role of Cdx genes in the mammalian gut. Gut. 2002;53:1394–1396. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.038240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lohnes D. The Cdx1 homeodomain protein: an integrator of posterior signaling in the mouse. Bioessays. 2003;25:971–980. doi: 10.1002/bies.10340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Savory JG, Pilon N, Grainger S, Sylvestre JR, Beland M, Houle M, Oh K, Lohnes D. Cdx1 and Cdx2 are functionally equivalent in vertebral patterning. Dev Biol. 2009;330:114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van den Akker E, Forlani S, Chawengsaksophak K, de Graaff W, Beck F, Meyer BI, Deschamps J. Cdx1 and Cdx2 have overlapping functions in anteroposterior patterning and posterior axis elongation. Development. 2002;129:2181–2193. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.9.2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Nes J, de Graaff W, Lebrin F, Gerhard M, Beck F, Deschamps J. The Cdx4 mutation affects axial development and reveals an essential role of Cdx genes in the ontogenesis of the placental labyrinth in mice. Development. 2006;133:419–428. doi: 10.1242/dev.02216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Savory JG, Mansfield M, St Louis C, Lohnes D. Cdx4 is a Cdx2 target gene. Mech Dev. 2011;128:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van de Ven C, Bialecka M, Neijts R, Young T, Rowland JE, Stringer EJ, Van Rooijen C, Meijlink F, Nóvoa A, Freund JN, Mallo M, Beck F, Deschamps J. Concerted involvement of Cdx/Hox genes and Wnt signaling in morphogenesis of the caudal neural tube and cloacal derivatives from the posterior growth zone. Development. 2011;138:3451–3462. doi: 10.1242/dev.066118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beck F, Stringer EJ. The role of Cdx genes in the gut and in axial development. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:353–357. doi: 10.1042/BST0380353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
