Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20965–20970.

Deregulation of decorin and FHL1 are associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression and poor prognosis

Chunhua Ji 1, Hui Liu 1, Ming Xiang 1, Junjun Liu 1, Fengtao Yue 1, Weiqing Wang 1, Xiao Chu 1
PMCID: PMC4723871  PMID: 26885026

Abstract

To investigate the expression of FHL1 and Decorin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its clinical significance. 82 ESCC tissues were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for the expression of FHL1 and Decorin. The role of the expression of FHL1 and Decorin in ESCC were statistically analyzed. The expression level of FHL1 and Decorin were reduced in malignant tissue samples in comparison to normal matched tissue (P < 0.05). It was also proved that the positive expressions of FHL1 and Decorin were associated with ESCC histological grade, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage and clinical stage (P < 0.05). In addition, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that the positive expressions of FHL1 and Decorin were associated with favorable prognosis in ESCC patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the positive expressions of FHL1 and Decorin were independent prognostic markers of overall survival of ESCC patients, respectively. The positive expressions of FHL1 and Decorin were associated with ESCC progression and good prognosis. Our results indicate that the positive expressions of FHL1 and Decorin were independent prognostic factors for patients with esophageal cancer, which might be potential valuable biomarkers for ESCC.

Keywords: Decorin, FHL1, prognosis, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, cancer biomarker

Introduction

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most frequently-occurring human cancers worldwide, and it has caused considerable loss of health and medical resources. Moreover, ESCC is more likely to attack East Asians (especially Chinese people and Japanese people) than Westerners. The number of ESCCs in China occupies almost five in ten of ESCCs around the world [1]. As reported, smoking, impoverished status and red meat consumption are associated with higher risk of ESCC [2]. Though various treatments are carried out to handle this disease, including surgical treatment, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and other supportive treatments, the long-term survival of ESCC patients has not been significantly improved [2]. Hitherto, various molecular biomarker experiments have been conducted to find out some reliable biomarkers that could predict the progression and prognosis of ESCC. As reported, abnormal expressions of some biomarkers are correlated with the poor prognosis of ESCC, such as positive expression of p53 [3], deregulation of microRNA-335 [4] and overexpression of c-Met [5].

Four and a half LIM domains 1 (FHL1) belongs to the FHL family (including FHL1 to 5) and consists of four and a half LIM domains. Proteins in the FHL family contain only LIM domains which consist of almost 50 amino acid residues and are rich in cysteine with two tandem zinc-finger structures. Initially, FHL1 was only reportedly correlated with cardiac hypertrophy, which can promote the differentiation of myoblasts [6]. However, recent studies imply that FHL1 might serve as a tumor inhibitor and plays an important role in tumorigenesis and progression. As reported, expressions of FHL1 mRNA and protein in gastric carcinoma tissues are significantly lower than in adjacent normal tissues [7]. Lower FHL1 expression is significantly correlated with lower degree of differentiation, higher tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, and greater invasive potential of gastric cancer. Similarly, Decorin has been verified to be another tumor-inhibitor that is correlated with tumorigenesis and progression. Decorin belongs to the extracellular matrix (ECM) small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) family. As reported, Decorin was deregulated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues compared with the adjacent normal lung tissues or normal tissues [8]. The deregulation of Decorin is associated with various clinicopathological factors, including tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage, and prognosis. Overexpression of Decorin could inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of the A549 cell line.

However, there is no clinical experiment exploring the roles of FHL1 and Decorin in ESCC. In this study, we will investigate the expression states of FHL1 and Decorin in ESCC patients, and retrospectively analyze their prognostic values for the first time.

Material and methods

Patients and specimens

Only patients with complete clinical information were recruited in our experiment. Finally, a total of 82 ESCC tumor tissues and matched adjacent normal esophageal tissues were enrolled from patients at the Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University between 2002 and 2008. These patients (64 men and 18 women) were aged 43 to 83 years old (median age 65) and followed up for 10 to 114 months (median 46 months). All specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and stored in the Pathologic Department of our hospital. The clinical stage of each patient was classified or reclassified according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from diagnosis to ESCC-caused death. This study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of our Hospital and all patients signed an informed consent form. All clinical data of patients were collected from hospitalization and subsequent records.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining

The specimens were made into 4-μm continuous sections for IHC analysis. IHC evaluation was performed using a rabbit anti-human FHL1 polyclonal primary antibody (Abcam, ab49241) and a rabbit anti-human Decorin polyclonal primary (Abcam, ab67449). The IHC staining was carried out according to the protocol of a detection kit (Shanghai BioSun Sci&Tech Co., Ltd). The staining intensities of FHL1 and Decorin were evaluated by two pathologists who were blind to the diagnosis of individual patients. The score assessment was based on addition between staining intensity and percentage of positive cells. In particular, staining intensity is scored according to a three-tier system: 0, no staining; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong. The percentage of positive cells was scored based on a four-tier system: 0, 0%; 1, ≤ 15%; 2, ≤ 30%; 3, ≤ 45%; 4, > 45%. Finally, the negative and positive expressions are defined as total score ≤ 2 and ≥ 3 respectively [9].

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Various clinicopathologic factors in different FHL1 or Decorin expression groups were examined, including: sex, age, tumor differentiation, metastasis, T stage and clinical stage. Categorical variables were compared with the pared Chi-square test. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factor, using the Cox regression model for OS. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Deregulation of FHL1 and decorin in ESCC

FHL1 and Decorin are both localized primarily in the cytoplasm (Figure 1). The expression levels of FHL1 and Decorin in ESCCs are 42.7% and 34.1%, respectively, but are 93.9% and 87.8%, respectively in normal tissues. We find that FHL1 and Decorin are significantly deregulated in ESCC, compared with normal tissues (P < 0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

IHC staining of FHL1 and Decorin in ESCC tissue (× 200). A. Positive staining of FHL1 in ESCC tissue; B. Negative staining of FHL1 in ESCC tissue; C. Positive staining of Decorin in ESCC tissue; D. Negative staining of Decorin in ESCC tissue.

Relationship between clinicopathologic factors and FHL1 or decorin expression in ESCC

The results show that positive expression of FHL1 is significantly associated with differentiation (P = 0.008), metastasis (P = 0.000), T stage (P = 0.000) and clinical stage (P = 0.000). Also positive expression of Decorin is significantly associated with metastasis (P = 0.001), T stage (P = 0.001) and clinical stage (P = 0.000). In addition, the relationships between clinicopathologic factors and FHL1 or Decorin expression are elaborated in Table 1.

Table 1.

Correlations between clinicopathological factors and expression of FHL1 and Decorin in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)

Clinicopathologic factors Number FHL1 Positive P value Decorin Positive P value
Gender Male 64 26 (40.6%) 0.477 20 (31.3%) 0.297
Female 18 9 (50%) 8 (44.4%)
Age (yr.) ≤ 60 25 8 (32%) 0.195 6 (24%) 0.199
60 57 27 (47.4%) 22 (38.6%)
Differentiation Well 57 30 (52.6%) 0.008 22 (38.6%) 0.199
Poor 25 5 (20%) 6 (24%)
T stage T1-T2 40 30 (75%) 0.000 21 (52.5%) 0.001
T3-T4 42 5 (11.9%) 7 (16.7%)
Lymph nodes metastasis Absence 44 27 (61.4%) 0.000 22 (50%) 0.001
Presence 38 8 (21.1%) 6 (15.8%)
Clinical stage I-II 41 30 (73.2%) 0.000 23 (56.1%) 0.000
III-IV 41 5 (12.2%) 5 (12.2%)

Prognostic role of expression status of FHL1 and decorin in ESCC

The Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that patients with negative FHL1 expression in ESCC have a significantly shorter OS period than those patients with positive FHL1 expression (median survival time 35 vs. 61 months; P < 0.001) (Figure 2A). Similarly, the negative expression of Decorin in ESCC is significantly correlated with poor prognosis (P < 0.05) (Figure 2B). The median survival time of Decorin-negative and -positive patients is 37 and 56 months, respectively. In addition, patients with positive expression of both FHL1 and Decorin have a significantly better prognosis than patients with negative expression of both FHL1 and Decorin (P < 0.001) (Figure 3). Multivariable analysis indicates that positive expressions of FHL1 (HR = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.118-0.986, P = 0.047) and Decorin (HR = 0.448, 95% CI: 0.216-0.930, P = 0.031) are both significant independent predictors of poor prognosis (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overall survival (OS) curves. A. OS curves of patients in relation to FHL1 expression; B. OS curves of patients in relation to Decorin expression.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Overall survival (OS) curves using combinations of FHL1 and Decorin expression statues.

Table 2.

Multivariable analysis of the prognostic roles for cliniopathological factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)

HR 95.0% CI P
Clinical stage 0.584 0.316 0.782 0.022
T stage 0.728 0.624 0.847 0.034
Differentiation 0.684 0.314 0.872 0.001
Lymph node metastasis 0.777 0.504 0.946 0.041
FHL1 positive 0.341 0.118 0.986 0.047
Decorin positive 0.448 0.216 0.930 0.031

Discussion

So far as we know, this is the first study explaining the prognostic role of deregulation of FHL1 and Decorin in ESCC patients. We find that both molecular biomarkers are significantly deregulated in ESCC tissues, compared with adjacent normal esophageal tissues. Furthermore, the loss of the two biomarkers is significantly correlated with several clinicopathological factors, such as differentiation, lymph node metastasis, T stage and clinical stage. Homogeneously, the loss of the two biomarkers has also been reported. For example, the expression of FHLl in lung cancer tissues was decreased, compared to non-cancerous tissues [8]. FHL1 expression in tumor tissues is frequently downregulated compared with normal mucosa [10]. As reported, various human cancers are found with deregulation of Decorin, including hepatocellular carcinoma [11], oral cancer [12], breast carcinoma [13], prostate tumor [14], and colorectal cancer [15].

We also analyzed the prognostic role of deregulation of FHL1 and/or Decorin in ESCC patients. Our results indicate that patients with negative FHL1 expression have a significantly shorter OS than those with positive FHL1 expression. Our results coincide with another study [10] that patients with low FHL1 expression tumor show significantly shorter survival than those with high FHL1 expression tumor. Similarly, the deregulation of Decorin in ESCC patients predicts a poor prognosis. Multivariate survival analysis indicates that deregulations of FHL1 and Decorin are both independent indicators for poor prognosis of ESCC.

For tumor-inhibiting factors, we have no enough knowledge about how the deregulation of FHL1 and Decorin is associated with the prognosis and progression of cancers. As reported, FHL1 impacts the progression of cancers by regulating the cycle of tumor cells. Cell line and animal experiments show that FHL1 increases the expression of p21 (a CDK inhibitor) through regulation of gene transcription in lung cancer cells [10]. Also p21 plays a role in the maintenance of G2/M-phase arrest, and the regulation of cell cycle arrest at the G1/S transition. FHL1 in-duces the upregulation of p21 and inhibits cyclins and their associated CDKs (mainly cyclin D1), which are the central machinery governing cell cycle progression. Finally, deregulation of FHL1 promotes the growth of anchorage-dependent and -independent lung cancer cells. In breast cancers, FHLl could interact with the estrogen receptor and regulate the growth of breast cancer cells [16].

Decorin is a member of SLRP family. It is demonstrated that abnormal expression of Decorin might impact tumor progression through several signal pathways [17]. Firstly, Decorin competes with EGF for a receptor binding site on the surface of tumor cells, and then inhibits tumor cell proliferation. Decorin also can suppress the activity of the ErbB2 and ErbB4 receptors, interact with Met, and inhibit cell migration and growth [18]. Secondly, Decorin might play a role in tumor angiogenesis through binding to the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and interacting with the TGF-β signal pathway [19]. Thirdly, Decorin might be associated with the loss of E-cadherin, and plays a significant role in tumor metastasis [17].

In conclusion, this is the first study focusing on evaluating the prognostic roles of FHL1 and Decorin expressions in ESCC patients. The results show that FHL1 and Decorin positive expressions are associated with favorable prognosis in ESCC patients. Furthermore, FHL1 and Decorin are both independent predictors of better overall survival in ESCC patients. In the future, we aim to get a more precise evaluation on the prognostic role of FHL1 and Decorin deregulation in ESCC patients, and thus more studies with large sample size and long-time follow-up are needed.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Scientific Research Fund from The Fifth People’s Hospital affiliated to Fudan University (Shanghai, China) (2013WYYJ03).

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lin Y, Totsuka Y, He Y, Kikuchi S, Qiao Y, Ueda J, Wei W, Inoue M, Tanaka H. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in japan and china. J Epidemiol. 2013;23:233–242. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yao W, Qin X, Qi B, Lu J, Guo L, Liu F, Liu S, Zhao B. Association of p53 expression with prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:7158–7163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang BJ, Gong HY, Zheng F, Liu DJ, Liu HX. Upregulation of miR-335 predicts a favorable prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:6213–6218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu Y, Peng Z, Li Z, Lu M, Gao J, Li Y, Shen L. Expression and clinical significance of c-Met in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12885-014-1001-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang J, Moravec CS, Sussman MA, DiPaola NR, Fu D, Hawthorn L, Mitchell CA, Young JB, Francis GS, McCarthy PM, Bond M. Decreased SLIM1 expression and increased gelsolin expression in failing human hearts measured by highdensity oligonucleotide arrays. Circulation. 2000;102:3046–3052. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu Y, Liu Z, Guo K. Expression of FHL1 in gastric cancer tissue and its correlation with the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;363:93–99. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-1161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Niu C, Liang C, Guo J, Cheng L, Zhang H, Qin X, Zhang Q, Ding L, Yuan B, Xu X, Li J, Lin J, Ye Q. Downregulation and growth inhibitory role of FHL1 in lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:2549–2556. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Walker RA. Quantification of immunohistochemistry issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment I. Histopathology. 2006;49:406–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sakashita K, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Kamohara Y, Inoue H, Sawada T, Hirakawa K, Mori M. Clinical significance of loss of Fhl1 expression in human gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2293–2300. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9904-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Horvath Z, Kovalszky I, Fullar A, Kiss K, Schaff Z, Iozzo RV, Baghy K. Decorin deficiency promotes hepatic carcinogenesismatrix biology. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:194–205. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dil N, Banerjee AG. A role for aberrantly expressed nuclear localized decorin in migration and invasion of dysplastic and malignant oral epithelial cells. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3:44. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buraschi S, Neill T, Owens RT, Iniguez LA, Purkins G, Vadigepalli R, Evans B, Schaefer L, Peiper SC, Wang ZX, Iozzo RV. Decorin protein core affects the global gene expression profile of the tumor microenvironment in a triple-negative orthotopic breast carcinoma xenograft model. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu Y, Sun H, Owens RT, Wu J, Chen YQ, Berquin IM. Decorin suppresses prostate tumor growth through inhibition of epidermal growth factor and androgen receptor pathways. Neoplasia. 2009;11:1042–1053. doi: 10.1593/neo.09760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bi X, Pohl NM, Qian Z, Yang GR, Gou Y, Guzman G, Kajdacsy-Balla A, Iozzo RV, Yang W. Decorinmediated inhibition of colorectal cancer growth and migration is associated with E-cadherin in vitro and in mice. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:326–330. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ding L, Niu C, Zheng Y, Xiong Z, Liu Y, Lin J, Sun H, Huang K, Yang W, Li X, Ye Q. FHL1 interacts with oestrogen receptors and regulates breast cancer cell growth. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:72–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00938.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bi XL, Yang W. Biological functions of decorin in cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32:266–269. doi: 10.5732/cjc.012.10301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Santra M, Eichstetter I, Iozzo RV. An anti-oncogenic role for decorin. Down-regulation of ErbB2 leads to growth suppression and cytodifferentiation of mammary carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35153–35161. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006821200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baghy K, Iozzo RV, Kovalszky I. Decorin-TG Fβ axis in hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60:262–268. doi: 10.1369/0022155412438104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES