Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Nov 20;27(2):175–182. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0695-0

Serum Androgens and Prostate Cancer Risk: Results From the Placebo Arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

Jeannette M Schenk 1, Cathee Till 2, Ann W Hsing 3, Frank Z Stanczyk 4, Zhihong Gong 5, Marian L Neuhouser 1, Juergen K Reichardt 6, Ashraful M Hoque 7, William D Figg 8, Phyllis J Goodman 2, Catherine M Tangen 2, Ian M Thompson 9
PMCID: PMC4724283  NIHMSID: NIHMS740162  PMID: 26589415

Abstract

Background

Compelling and long-standing data suggest that androgens play an important role in the development of both normal prostate epithelium and prostate cancer. Although testosterone administration can induce prostate cancer (PCA) in laboratory animals, serum-based epidemiologic studies examining serum androgens in humans have not consistently supported a role for androgens in prostate carcinogenesis. We examined whether pre-diagnostic serum androgens were associated with PCA risk in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

Methods

In this nested case-control study, cases (n=1,025) were primarily local stage, biopsy-detected cancers, and controls (n=1,037) were biopsy-confirmed to be PCA-free. Pre-diagnostic serum androgens (total testosterone, 3α-androstanediol glucuronide (3α-diol G), free testosterone), estrogen:testosterone ratio and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured in pooled (baseline and year 3) blood samples.

Results

We found no significant associations between serum androgens, estrogen:testosterone ratios or SHBG and risk of total, low (Gleason < 7) or high-grade (Gleason 7-10) PCA.

Conclusion

Much remains to be learned about the role of androgens in prostate carcinogenesis. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of androgens, timing of exposure, genetic modulators of androgen metabolism, or environmental exposures that may affect androgen influence on prostate carcinogenesis.

Keywords: prostate cancer, androgens, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

Introduction

Data from animal and clinical studies support a role for androgens in prostate cancer (PCA) growth, proliferation, and progression.(1-3) However, results from serum-based epidemiologic studies in humans have been inconsistent.(4) Earlier prospective studies suggested that higher serum concentrations of testosterone and 3α-androstanediol glucuronide (3α-diol G) were associated with an increased risk of PCA(5-7); however, in 2008 a large pooled analysis of prospective studies found no association between serum androgens and PCA risk.(8) More recent studies have confirmed the lack of association between androgens with PCA risk(9-11), although others found a positive association for serum testosterone and PCA risk only among men with lowest concentrations of testosterone(12), and an inverse association of estradiol:testosterone ratio and aggressive PCA(13).

Within the prostate, testosterone is converted to the most active androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by the enzyme steroid 5α-reductase type II then metabolized to 3α- or 3β-diol G for clearance.(14, 15) Thus, 3α-diol G is a frequently used marker for steroid 5α-reductase type II activity and DHT levels.(16) The conversion of testosterone to DHT is inhibited by steroid 5α-reductase inhibitors: finasteride and dutasteride.(17) Previously we reported that men treated with 5 mg of finasteride daily had a 74% reduction in 3α-diol G and 10% increase in serum testosterone.(18) Although these findings were consistent with the action of finasteride, these large changes in androgen concentrations were not associated with subsequent PCA risk.(18) Furthermore, neither pre- nor post-treatment concentrations of androgens among men in the finasteride arm were associated with subsequent PCA risk.(18)

Here we examine whether serum concentrations of total testosterone, free testosterone, estrogen:testosterone ratios, 3α-diol G, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a carrier protein for androgens are associated with subsequent risk of PCA among men in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), where screening was standardized and PCA status was confirmed by biopsy.

Materials and Methods

The PCPT was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial testing whether the 5α-reductase type II inhibitor finasteride could reduce the 7-year period prevalence of PCA. Details of the PCPT and participant characteristics have been described previously.(19) During the trial, men underwent annual digital rectal exam (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening; men with abnormal DRE or PSA (>4.0 ng/ml) were recommended for biopsy. Men not diagnosed with PCA during their 7-year participation were recommended to undergo an end-of-study prostate biopsy. Biopsies were reviewed for adenocarcinoma both at local clinical sites and by Central Pathology review, with concordance achieved in all cases. Clinical stage was assigned locally and tumors were graded centrally using the Gleason scoring system.

Case and Control Selection

This study was part of a large nested case-control study from the placebo arm designed to examine multiple hypotheses about PCA biology and risk.(20) Briefly, cases (n=1,041) had biopsy-confirmed PCA and baseline blood available for analysis. Controls (n =1,037) were chosen from the 3,323 men who had a negative end-of-study biopsy and baseline blood available for analysis. All non-whites were included as controls, and remaining controls were frequency-matched to cases on distributions of age (±5 years) and history of PCA in a first-degree relative.

Data Collection and Laboratory Methods

Information on age, race, education, physical activity, alcohol intake, history of smoking, history of diabetes, family history of PCA in first-degree relatives, was collected at baseline using self-administered questionnaires. Participant height and weight were measured at baseline; body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2).

Non-fasting blood was collected at baseline and annually thereafter until PCA diagnosis or the end of the study. Venous blood was drawn into tubes without anticoagulant, refrigerated, and shipped to a central repository where it was centrifuged, aliquoted, and stored at −70°C until analysis; 0.5-mL serum samples were collected at baseline and year 3 and pooled before analysis to better characterize androgen levels and reduce intraindividual variability. Alternate years were selected if men were missing a year 3 sample or were diagnosed before year 3 (n=237), and a single, baseline sample was used if a post-baseline, pre-diagnostic sample was unavailable. We further excluded men missing ≥1 covariates (n=21), leaving 1,032 cases and 1,025 controls for analysis.

Total testosterone, estrone, estradiol, 3α-diol G, and SHBG were quantified in serum by highly specific immunoassays at the Reproductive Endocrine Research Laboratory, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California (F.Z.S.), as described previously.(18) Briefly, total testosterone and SHBG were measured by a direct solid-phase competitive chemilumiscent enzyme immunoassay and a direct solid-phase 2-site chemiluminescent immunometric assay, respectively. 3α-diol G and estrogens were measured by radioimmunoassay. Free testosterone was calculated as described previously(18) using total testosterone and SHBG concentrations, assuming an average concentration for albumin. Pooled serum from healthy volunteers was included as quality controls in each analytic batch and coefficients of variation for 3α-diol G, testosterone, and SHBG were 14.0%, 10.5%, and 12.2%, respectively. Assays were not successful for a small number of samples, thus sample sizes differ slightly for each analyte.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study sample. To generate distributions of hormones in cases and controls, adjusted least-square means of hormone concentrations were estimated using linear regression, stratified by race and adjusted for age and BMI.

Unadjusted concentrations of androgens and estrogen:testosterone ratios were categorized into quartiles based on distributions among controls. To explore whether associations between androgen concentrations and PCA risk were nonlinear we examined PCA detection rates over the range of hormone concentrations using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS). There was no suggestion of non-linearity apparent; thus, we report only the analyses for hormones defined as quartiles. Individual associations of estrogen and estradiol with PCA risk in the same study sample have been reported previously(21).

Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall prostate cancer risk, and multinomial logistic regression models were used for low-grade (Gleason 2-6, n=780) and high-grade (Gleason 7-10, n=217) PCA compared to controls. To capture a more phenotypically-uniform group of highly aggressive cancers, high-grade PCA was also defined as Gleason 8–10 (n=47) although results did not differ substantively and are presented only for Gleason 7-10. Models were adjusted for age (continuous), race (Caucasian, other) and family history of PCA in first-degree relatives (yes, no), as well as for BMI (continuous). Further control for SHBG, serum cholesterol (continuous), physical activity (sedentary, light, moderate, active) and history of diabetes did not affect results and were not included in final models. Tests for linear trend across quartiles were performed by using an ordinal variable corresponding to rank from the lowest category to the highest.

To evaluate whether associations differed by body mass index (<25, 25-29.9, 30+) or race (white vs. non-white), we also examined associations stratified by these variables. All statistical tests were two-sided, with statistical significance set at p=0.05, and were carried out using SAS statistical software (version 9.2, SAS Corporation, Cary, NC).

Results

Table 1 gives means and distributions of hormones and demographic, anthropometric, and health-related variables. Due to the sampling scheme, cases and controls were similar in age and family history of PCA, and there were more non-white controls. Cases had a higher baseline PSA than controls, and were less likely to be diabetic or overweight/obese (Table 1); however, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity and mean concentrations of serum androgens and SHBG were similar among cases and controls. The median follow-up time was similar for cases and controls (7.0 years (Interquartile range: 6.97-7.09) and 6.9 years (IQR: 5.03-7.05), respectively).

Table 1.

Demographic and health-related characteristics at baseline and pre-diagnostic androgen concentrations among cases and controls in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial 1993-2003

Cases n=1,032
Controls n=1,025
Characteristic Mean SD Mean SD P valueb
Age (Years) 63.6 5.5 63.5 5.5 Matched
Waist-to-hip Ratio (WHR) 0.96 0.05 0.96 0.05 0.383
Prostate specific antigen (PSA; ng/ml) 1.5 0.8 1.2 0.7 <0.0001
Meana 95% CI Meana 95% CI
Total testosterone (ng/dL) 384 376-392 382 374-390 0.72
3a-diol G (ng/mL) 6.7 6.5-7.0 6.6 6.3-6.8 0.34
Free testosterone (pg/mL) 8.6 8.5-8.8 8.6 8.4-8.7 0.52
Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG; nmol/L) 39.2 38.3-40.0 39.5 38.6-40.4 0.71
Estrone:Testosterone ratio 0.13 0.13-0.13 0.13 0.13-0.13 0.62
Estradiol:Testosterone ratio 0.10 0.09-0.10 0.10 0.09-0.10 0.81
n % n %
Race Over-sampled
    White (Non-Hispanic) 958 92.8 860 83.9
    Black (Non-Hispanic) 46 4.5 74 7.2
    Hispanic 22 2.1 68 6.6
    Other 6 0.6 23 2.2
Education 0.12c
    <=12 yr 175 17.0 187 18.2
    13-15 yr 277 26.9 303 29.6
    16+ yr 579 56.2 535 52.2
Smoking status 0.38
    Current 381 36.9 350 34.1
    Former 70 6.8 78 7.6
    Never 581 56.3 597 58.2
Alcohol Consumption 0.90c
    Non-drinker 239 23.2 236 23.0
    <30 g/day 702 68.0 703 68.6
    >=30 g/day 91 8.8 86 8.4
Body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) 0.01c
    <25 301 29.2 243 23.7
    25 to <30 531 51.5 560 54.6
    ≥30 200 19.4 222 21.7
Waist to Hip ratio (WHR) 0.40c
    <0.94 282 30.7 312 33.4
    0.94 to <0.98 328 35.7 312 33.4
    ≥0.98 310 33.7 311 33.3
Family History Matched
    No 818 79.3 814 79.4
    Yes 214 20.7 211 20.6
Diabetes 0.002
    No 990 95.9 950 92.8
    Yes 42 4.1 74 7.2
Physical Activity 0.77c
    Sedentary 168 16.3 169 16.5
    Light 423 41.1 432 42.3
    Moderate 350 34.0 306 29.9
    Active 88 8.6 115 11.3
T-stage
    T1a, b 224 22 .3
    T1c 536 53.3
    T2a 135 13.4
    T2b, c 99 9.9
    T3 11 1.1
N-stage
    0 295 98.3
    1 5 1.7
Gleason Grade
    2-6 776 78.5
    7-10 212 21.5
a

least-square means and p-values adjusted for age and BMI

b

P value from Chi-square test (categorical variables) or t test (continuous variables)

c

P value calculated in a trend test

Associations between serum androgens and SHBG and PCA are given in Table 2. There were no statistically significant associations of serum testosterone, 3α-diol G, estrogen:testosterone ratios and SHBG concentrations with risk of PCA overall. When stratified by disease grade [low- vs. high-grade (Gleason score 2-6 vs. 7-10)], there was a suggestion of a positive association for estradiol:testosterone ratio ≥ 0.07 with risk of high-grade PCA compared to controls; however, there was no clear monotonic trend. There were no other associations for serum testosterone, 3α-diol G, estrone:testosterone ratio or SHBG with risk of low- or high-grade PCA. Associations of serum androgens, estrogen:testosterone ratios and SHBG with overall, low- and high-grade PCA did not differ when stratified by BMI or race (data not shown).

Table 2.

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)a for total, low-grade, and high-grade prostate cancer in relation to serum concentrations of androgen in the PCPT

Total Cancer Low Grade <Gleason <7) High Grade (Gleason 7+)

N case/control OR (95% CI) N case/control OR (95% CI) N case/control OR (95% CI)
Total Testosterone (ng/dL)
<292 249/256 ref 179/256 ref 58/256 ref
292 to <362 247/255 1.01 (0.79-1.30) 179/255 1.01 (0.77-1.33) 55/255 1.00 (0.67-1.52)
362 to <456 283/256 1.14 (0.89-1.46) 218/256 1.20 (0.92-1.58) 53/256 0.98 (0.64-1.49)
≥456 252/257 1.01 (0.78-1.30) 200/257 1.09 (0.82-1.44) 45/257 0.86 (0.55-1.33)
p-trend 0.74 0.35 0.50
3α-diol G (ng/mL)
<4.0 257/255 ref 190/255 ref 51/255 ref
4.0 to <5.6 261/256 1.03 (0.81-1.32) 203/256 1.09 (0.84-1.43) 48/256 0.93 (0.60-1.44)
5.6 to <8.0 254/255 1.00 (0.78-1.29) 197/255 1.05 (0.80-1.38) 47/255 0.93 (0.60-1.43)
≥8.0 260/259 1.02 (0.79-1.31) 186/259 0.99 (0.75-1.30) 66/259 1.26 (0.84-1.90)
p-trend 0.95 0.87 0.25
Free Testosterone (pg/mL)
<6.9 245/256 ref 174/256 ref 56/256 ref
6.9 to <8.3 241/257 0.98 (0.76-1.25) 175/257 0.99 (0.75-1.30) 56/257 1.04 (0.69-1.57)
8.3 to <10.0 289/255 1.19 (0.93-1.53) 222/255 1.25 (0.96-1.64) 55/255 1.08 (0.71-1.64)
≥10.0 257/257 1.07 (0.83-1.38) 205/257 1.16 (0.88-1.53) 45/257 0.93 (0.60-1.45)
p-trend 0.33 0.12 0.83
Estrone:Testosterone Ratio
<0.09 266/253 ref 211/253 ref 45/253 ref
0.09 to <0.12 265/253 1.01 (0.79-1.29) 198/253 0.97 (0.74-1.26) 56/253 1.20 (0.78-1.85)
0.12 to <0.15 212/253 0.82 (0.64-1.07) 165/253 0.83 (0.63-1.09) 36/253 0.75 (0.46-1.21)
≥0.15 277/253 1.11 (0.86-1.43) 197/253 1.03 (0.78-1.36) 68/253 1.38 (0.89-2.13)
p-trend 0.76 0.90 0.38
Estradiol:Testosterone Ratio
<0.07 235/255 ref 195/255 ref 35/255 ref
0.07 to <0.09 297/257 1.28 (1.00-1.64) 218/257 1.14 (0.88-1.49) 62/257 1.71 (1.09-2.69)
0.09 to <0.11 248/255 1.09 (0.85-1.41) 180/255 0.97 (0.74-1.27) 60/255 1.64 (1.04-2.60)
≥0.11 248/256 1.13 (0.87-1.48) 182/256 1.04 (0.78-1.39) 52/256 1.32 (0.81-2.16)
p-trend 0.66 0.91 0.38
SHBG (nmol/L)
<29 245/256 ref 187/256 ref 49/256 ref
29 to <37 277/249 1.17 (0.91-1.50) 203/249 1.13 (0.87-1.49) 58/249 1.21 (0.79-1.84)
37 to <46 236/263 0.93 (0.72-1.20) 178/263 0.92 (0.70-1.21) 52/263 1.03 (0.67-1.59)
≥46 273/256 1.07 (0.83-1.39) 208/256 1.08 (0.81-1.43) 52/256 1.04 (0.66-1.63)
p-trend 0.95 0.98 0.94

Abbreviations: SHBG = Sex hormone-binding globulin; 3αdiol G = 3α androstanediol glucuronide

All odds ratios adjusted for age, race, BMI, and family history of prostate cancer

Discussion

In this study of primarily local-stage PCA, in which the presence or absence of cancer was determined by biopsy, a unique attribute of the PCPT, there were no statistically significant associations of serum testosterone (total or free), 3α-diol G, estrogen:testosterone ratios or SHBG concentrations with risk of total, low- or high-grade PCA.

The lack of significant associations between serum androgens and PCA is consistent with results from most prospective studies. A pooled analysis of 3,886 and 6,438 controls from 18 prospective studies, not including the PCPT, did not find a clear association between serum androgens and PCA risk(8). Since this initial pooled analysis, additional large prospective studies have reported null associations for serum testosterone and PCA.(9, 10, 22) Associations of SHBG with PCA have been less consistent. The initial pooled analysis reported a modest inverse association of SHBG and total PCA risk (RR for highest vs. lowest quintile=0.86, 95%CI=0.75, 0.98; Ptrend=0.01)(8), though no large prospective studies since, including this one, have found an association(9, 10, 22). We found a suggestion of a positive association for estradiol:testerone ratio with risk of high-grade PCA, which is consistent with at least one prior study(23); however, other studies have reported inverse(7, 13, 24) and null associations(11, 25).

In a prior study from the PCPT, we reported that among men treated with finasteride, serum androgens were not associated with PCA risk.(18) Finasteride inhibits the intraprostatic conversion of testosterone to DHT, decreasing serum concentrations of 3α-diol G, a marker for steroid 5α reductase activity(15) Although finasteride treatment reduced serum 3α-diol G by 74% and increased serum testosterone by 10%, neither post-treatment concentrations, nor change in concentrations were associated with subsequent PCA risk.(18) In the placebo arm of the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) Trial, which also determined presence/absence of PCA for all men by biopsy, testosterone was associated with a positive risk of PCA among men with low (≤288.4 ng/dl) testosterone, but there was no association among men with normal (> 288.4 ng/dl) testosterone concentrations.(12) In post-hoc analyses among men with concentrations ≤288.4 ng/dl in the current study, we found no association of serum testosterone with risk of total, low- or high-grade PCA (OR for log-transformed testosterone with total PCA=1.31 ( 95%CI: 0.58-2.96); low-grade PCA=1.11 (0.46, 2.71); high-grade PCA=1.95 (0.47, 8.05)).

Although results from serum-based observational studies have been largely null, data from genetic studies have suggested that certain genes in the androgen metabolism pathways, such as the androgen receptor, CYP17, or UGT may play a role in PCA development.(26, 27) Future large studies should examine the joint effects of serum androgens and genetic variants in the androgen metabolism pathway to determine whether subgroups of men have a higher risk of PCA.

A unique strength of this study is the use of androgen and SHBG concentrations from pooled blood samples, which reduces measurement error due to intraindividual variability in androgen concentrations and may better reflect average hormonal status in older men compared to a single blood sample. Other strengths of PCPT include the standardized screening with DRE and PSA, and the end-of-study biopsy recommended to all cancer-free men at study completion, which minimized detection bias and the likelihood of undiagnosed PCA in controls. Several limitations should also be acknowledged. First, differences in associations of hormone concentrations with PCA risk by time from measurement to diagnosis cannot be evaluated in this study because many men were diagnosed via the end-of-study biopsy; thus, the time from androgen measurement to diagnosis of PCA is somewhat ‘artificial’. Second, although high-quality hormone assays were used, mean testosterone concentrations were slightly lower than those reported in other studies, which may be related to the use of pooled samples, assay-related non-differential measurement error, or characteristics of the overall PCPT population.

In addition, although the use of pooled blood samples from multiple time points may better reflect hormonal status in older men, the etiological relevance to subsequent PCA development is unclear. It is possible that cumulative hormonal exposure over a lifetime, exposure at an earlier age, such as in utero or adolescence, or changes in androgens over time are important for prostate carcinogenesis.(8) Furthermore, circulating androgen concentrations may not adequately reflect intraprostatic androgen concentrations(28) or androgenic actions, as evidenced by our prior finding from PCPT that even with over 70% reduction in serum 3α diol G, a marker of intraprostatic androgen levels, there is little reduction of risk of prostate cancer in the PCPT.(18) Additional etiologic research is needed to better understand the issues of timing and duration of hormone exposures with respect to the development of PCA. Finally, none of these data provide information regarding the impact of androgen supplementation in aging men on PCA risk.

In summary, in this large sample of primarily early-stage, biopsy-detected cancers from the placebo arm of the PCPT, we found that pre-diagnostic serum androgen and SHBG concentrations were not associated with PCA risk. Although there is strong biologic rationale for the role of androgens in PCA growth, proliferation, and progression, much remains to be learned about this relationship. Further research should explore issues of timing and duration of hormone exposures and the effects of exogenous androgen supplementation on PCA risk, and whether genetic predictors of androgen metabolism or lifestyle and other health exposures that may affect androgen influence on prostate carcinogenesis.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the following: P01-CA108964, UM1-CA182883 and U10-CA37429 from the National Cancer Institute; Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics; P30-CA054174, the Cancer Center Support Grant for the Cancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; P30 CA015704-36, the Cancer Center Support Grant for the Seattle Cancer Consortium, Seattle, WA; U01 CA086042 of the Early Detection Research Network; The authors would like to acknowledge that Dr. Ronald K. Ross, University of Southern California (deceased), participated in the design of this study.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none declared

References

  • 1.Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer: I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Research. 1941;1:293–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pollard M, Luckert PH, Schmidt MA. Induction of prostate adenocarcinomas in Lobund Wistar rats by testosterone. The Prostate. 1982;3:563–8. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990030605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharifi N, Gulley JL, Dahut WL. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005;294:238–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hsing AW, Chu LW, Stanczyk FZ. Androgen and prostate cancer: is the hypothesis dead? Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2008;17:2525–30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hsing AW, Comstock GW. Serological precursors of cancer: serum hormones and risk of subsequent prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 1993;2:27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nomura A, Stemmermann GN, Chyou P-H, Henderson BE, Stanczyk FZ. Serum androgens and prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 1996;5:621–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Ma J, Longcope C, Stampfer MJ. Prospective study of sex hormone levels and risk of prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1996;88:1118–26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.16.1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Endogenous Hormones and Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group. Roddam A, Allen N, Appleby P, Key T. Endogenous sex hormones and prostate cancer: a collaborative analysis of 18 prospective studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2008;100:170. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weiss JM, Huang WY, Rinaldi S, Fears TR, Chatterjee N, Hsing AW, et al. Endogenous sex hormones and the risk of prostate cancer: a prospective study. International Journal of Cancer. 2008;122:2345–50. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gill JK, Wilkens LR, Pollak MN, Stanczyk FZ, Kolonel LN. Androgens, growth factors, and risk of prostate cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort. The Prostate. 2010;70:906–15. doi: 10.1002/pros.21125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daniels NA, Nielson CM, Hoffman AR, Bauer DC, Group OFIMS Sex hormones and the risk of incident prostate cancer. Urology. 2010;76:1034–40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Muller RL, Gerber L, Moreira DM, Andriole G, Castro-Santamaria R, Freedland SJ. Serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and prostate cancer risk in the placebo arm of the reduction by dutasteride of prostate cancer events trial. European urology. 2012;62:757–64. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Black A, Pinsky PF, Grubb RL, Falk RT, Hsing AW, Chu L, et al. Sex steroid hormone metabolism in relation to risk of aggressive prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2014;23:2374–82. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chokkalingam AP, Stanczyk FZ, Reichardt JK, Hsing AW. Molecular epidemiology of prostate cancer: hormone-related genetic loci. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2007;12:3436–60. doi: 10.2741/2325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chu LW, Reichardt JK, Hsing AW. Androgens and the molecular epidemiology of prostate cancer. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity. 2008;15:261–70. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3282febcf6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ross R, Bernstein L, Pike M, Henderson B, Lobo R, Stanczyk F, et al. 5-alpha-reductase activity and risk of prostate cancer among Japanese and US white and black males. The Lancet. 1992;339:887–9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90927-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salvador JA, Pinto RM, Silvestre SM. Steroidal 5α-reductase and 17α-hydroxylase/17, 20-lyase (CYP17) inhibitors useful in the treatment of prostatic diseases. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2013;137:199–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kristal AR, Till C, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Neuhouser ML, Stanczyk FZ, et al. Associations of serum sex steroid hormone and 5α-androstane-3α, 17β-diol glucuronide concentrations with prostate cancer risk among men treated with finasteride. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2012;21:1823–32. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Miller GJ, Ford LG, et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349:215–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Kristal AR, Thompson IM, Platz EA, Figg WD, et al. Transition of a clinical trial into translational research: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial experience. Cancer Prevention Research. 2010;3:1523–33. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yao S, Till C, Kristal AR, Goodman PJ, Hsing AW, Tangen CM, et al. Serum estrogen levels and prostate cancer risk in the prostate cancer prevention trial: a nested case–control study. Cancer Causes & Control. 2011;22:1121–31. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9787-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gershman B, Shui IM, Stampfer M, Platz EA, Gann PH, Sesso HL, et al. Prediagnostic circulating sex hormones are not associated with mortality for men with prostate cancer. European urology. 2014;65:683–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Platz EA, Leitzmann MF, Rifai N, Kantoff PW, Chen Y-C, Stampfer MJ, et al. Sex steroid hormones and the androgen receptor gene CAG repeat and subsequent risk of prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2005;14:1262–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsai CJ, Cohn BA, Cirillo PM, Feldman D, Stanczyk FZ, Whittemore AS. Sex steroid hormones in young manhood and the risk of subsequent prostate cancer: a longitudinal study in African-Americans and Caucasians (United States). Cancer Causes & Control. 2006;17:1237–44. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Severi G, Morris HA, MacInnis RJ, English DR, Tilley W, Hopper JL, et al. Circulating steroid hormones and the risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2006;15:86–91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taioli E, Sears V, Watson A, Flores-Obando RE, Jackson MD, Ukoli FA, et al. Polymorphisms in CYP17 and CYP3A4 and prostate cancer in men of African descent. The Prostate. 2013;73:668–76. doi: 10.1002/pros.22612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fernandez P, Zeigler-Johnson CM, Spangler E, van der Merwe A, Jalloh M, Gueye SM, et al. Androgen metabolism gene polymorphisms, associations with prostate cancer risk and pathological characteristics: a comparative analysis between south African and Senegalese men. Prostate cancer. 2012:2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/798634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heracek J, Richard H, Martin H, Luboslav S, Jana S, Jitka K, et al. Tissue and serum levels of principal androgens in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Steroids. 2007;72:375–80. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2007.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES