Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2015 Oct-Dec;10(4):663–668.

Genetic Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from Zoo Wildlife and Pet Birds in Fujian, China

Renfeng CHEN 1, Xuan LIN 1, Lingying HU 1, Xiaoli CHEN 3, Yao TANG 3, Jia ZHANG 1, Meizhen CHEN 1, Shoukun WANG 1,*, Cuiqin HUANG 2,4,*
PMCID: PMC4724846  PMID: 26811736

Abstract

Background:

Toxoplasmosis, a worldwide zoonotic disease, is caused by Toxoplasma gondii. The distribution of genetic diversity of T. gondii in wild animals is of great importance to understand the transmission of the parasite in the environment. However, little is known about T. gondii prevalence in wild animals and birds in China.

Methods:

We conducted the genetic characterization of T. gondii isolated from Zoo Wild Animals and Pet Birds in Fujian Province, Southeastern China. Heart tissues were collected from 45 zoo animals and 140 pet birds. After identified using B1 gene, the genetic diversity of T. gondii isolates were typed at 11 genetic markers, including SAG1, 5’ and 3’-SAG2, alternative SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c22-8, c29-2, L358, PK1, Apico, and CS3.

Results:

Seven of 45 zoo animals and 3 of 140 pet birds were positive by PCR amplification using T. gondii B1 gene specific primers. Of these positive isolates, 3 isolates from Black-capped (Cebus apella), Peacock (Peafowl) and Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) were successfully genotyped at 11 genetic loci, and grouped to three distinct genotypes: ToxoDB Genotype #9, #2 and #10, respectively.

Conclusion:

This is the first genotyping of T. gondii isolated from zoo wild animals and pet birds in Fujian, China. There is a potential risk for the transmission of this parasite through zoo wild animals and pet birds in this region.

Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii, Zoo animals, Pet Birds, Genetic characterization, China

Introduction

The successful pathogen, Toxoplasma gondii, is able to infect virtually all warm-blooded animals including birds and mammals in worldwide, obligating to the zoonotic toxoplasmosis (1). Human beings acquired the disease mainly through ingestion of tissue cysts or oocysts of T. gondii, containing in food or water (2). T. gondii infection in healthy adults rarely causes clinical symptoms, but can lead to be fatal in immunocompromised individuals (24).

In wildlife, many animals also were infected by T. gondii. Some studies reported high infection rate of T. gondii in zoo animals and wild birds. For example, Murata in early 1989 just showed 29.28% (53/181) and 16.94% (61/179) of T. gondii IgG in mammals and wild birds, respectively, by serological survey (5). Zhang et al. also reported there had 25% (4/16) of T. gondii antibody in primates, 69.4% (25/36) in carnivores, 27.6% (8/29) in herbivores and 11.11% (4/36) in birds in China (6). There was 36.17% (51/141) in felids and 10.81% (4/37) in prosimians (7). Other recent reports also showed the high infection rate such as 36.1% (73/202) of wild birds captured from the wild environment (8) and 12.46% (39 /313) of house sparrows in China (9).

In recent years, different sources of T. gondii strains were identified using multilocus polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method, which was established for genotyping by Su and other scholars (1014). The distribution of genetic diversity of T. gondii in wildlife animals is of great importance to understand the transmission of this parasite in the environment. Some studies have identified several genetic characterizations of T. gondii isolates from cats, bats, sheep, and birds in China (1518). However, little information concerning T. gondii isolates from zoo animals and pet birds in southeast China.

The objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalence and genetically characterize T. gondii in wild animals from Fuzhou zoo and pet birds’ farms in Fujian province, southeastern China.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

A total of 185 animals were randomly collected from Fujian province during 2012 and 2014. The animals were consisted of 24 species, listing in Table 1. The 45 heart tissue samples from were collected from zoo animals, and 140 heart tissue samples were collected from pet birds. All tissue samples were stored at −20 °C prior to use.

Table 1: Animals from Fujian province, China used in the present study and the prevalence of T. gondii infection in these animals.

Class Animal Number Positive
Zoo animals Himalayan Black Bear ( Ursus thibetanus ) 2 0
Wild Red Dog ( Cuon alpinus ) 2 1
Masked palm civet ( Paguma larvata taivana ) 1 0
Lemur ( Aye-Aye ) 3 1
Patas monkey (Erythrocebus patas ) 1 0
Squirrel Monkey ( Saimiri sciureus ) 3 0
Black-capped ( Cebus apella ) 1 1
Francois’s Leaf Monkey ( Trachypithecus francoisi ) 1 0
Barking Deer ( Muntiacus muntjak ) 6 0
Zebra ( Equus burchellii ) 1 1
Big antelope ( T.derbianus ) 1 0
Alpaca ( Lama pacos ) 1 0
Red panda ( Ailurus fulgens ) 10 1
Black Swan ( Cygnus atratus ) 4 0
Brown Hawk-owl ( Ninox scutulata ) 1 0
Peacock ( Peafowl ) 5 1
Red-crowned Crane ( Grus japonensis ) 1 1
Grey-faced Buzzard ( Butastur indicus ) 1 0
Total 45 7
Pet birds Black-billed Magpie ( Pica pica ) 18 1
Budgerigar ( Melopsittacus undulatus ) 67 1
Fischer’s Lovebird ( Agapornis personata fische ) 28 0
Zebra Finch ( Poephila guttata ) 20 1
Cockatiel ( Nymphicus hollandicus ) 3 0
Starling ( Acridotheres cristatellus ) 4 0
Total 140 3

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from heart tissue samples of wild animals and pet birds using TIANamp Genomic DNA kit (TianGen™, Beijing, China). In brief, 30 mg of heart tissue were treated with sodium dodecyl sulphate/proteinase K at 56 °C for overnight digestion in a thermostat water bath. DNA samples were prepared according to the previous study (19) and eluted into 60 uL with elution buffer.

The positive genomic DNA of T. gondii RH (Type I) and PRU (Type II) strains were kindly provided by Fujian Normal University and Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, respectively.

Genetic characterization of T. gondii isolates

At first, all the DNA samples from tissues of wild animals and pet birds were identified using semi-nested PCR method based on T. gondii B1 gene as described previously (20). In brief, the first round were amplified at 35 cycles with 93 °C for 10 s, 57 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 30 s. Then the nested PCR was beginning at 93 °C 10 s for denaturation, following by annealing at 62.5 °C for 10 s and the 72 °C 10 s for extension (21). The PCR amplification was performed by VeritiTM 96-Well Thermal Cycler (ABI), and the products were separated by 1.5% agarose gel, visualized under ultraviolet light.

The positive samples were then genotyped using Multilocus PCR-RFLP method as previously described by amplifications of 11 markers, including SAG1, 5’ and 3’-SAG2, alternative SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c22-8, c29-2, L358, PK1, Apico, and CS3 ((13, (15, (22).

The reaction volume (25 μL) contained 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM each primer, 0. 25 mM each dNTP, 1.25 U Golden DNA polymerase (Tiangen, Beijing, China), and 2 μL T. gondii DNA. All samples were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, then 35 cycles of PCR at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 40 s and 72 °C for 7 min. Similar program was used for the nested PCR. The nested PCR was carried out with an annealing temperature at 60 °C for 60 s for all the markers except Apico, which was amplified at 55 °C. The PCR products were digested using restriction enzymes and separated by 2.5% agarose gel. The bands were observed under ultraviolet light. The previous studies ((9, (13, (14, (15) are used to compare with the results of the genetic characterization of the Chinese T. gondii in our present work.

Results

Of the total 185 samples, 10 samples were detected to be positive for the T. gondii B1 gene, including 7 zoo animals (1 Black-capped, 1 Wild Red Dog, 1 Lemur, 1 zebra, 1 Red panda, 1 Peacock, 1 Red-crowned Crane, 15.56%, 7/45) and 3 pet birds (1 Budgerigar, 1 Black-billed Magpie, 1 Zebra Finch, 2.14%, 3/140,) (Table 1).

The positive rate of T. gondii DNA in zoo animals was significantly higher than that of pet birds in Fujian, China (P<0.05. Further genotyped the positive samples using Multi-locus PCR-RFLP method showed that 3 dis-tinct genotypes (ToxoDB Genotype #9, #2 and #10) of T. gondii from Black-capped (Cebus apella), Peacock (Peafowl) and Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) respectively were identified (Table 2).

Table 2: Results of genotyping of T. gondii from Black-capped, Peacock and Budgerigar.

Isolate Host SAG 1 5+3 SAG2 SAG 2 SAG 3 BTU B GRA6 C22-8 C29-2 L358 PK1 Apico CS3 Genetype
RH Human I I I I I I I I I I I I Type I Tox-oDB#10
PRU Human II or III II II nd II II II II II II I II Type II ToxoDB#1
TgBcFZ Black-capped u-1 II II III III II II III II II I II ToxoDB#9
TgCpFZ Peacock II or III III III III III III III III III III III III Type III ToxoDB#2
TgBFZ Budgerigar I I I I I I I I I nd I I Type I Tox-oDB#10

nd: represents no data, u-1: represents unique RFLP genotypes

Discussion

By using sequence-specific primers, the relative number of copies of a particular DNA sequence can be determined. There are many applications of this technique in the field of diagnosis (2325). T. gondii can be detected by semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using B1 genes in pig, cat, and other wild animals (2629). In the present study, we identified the T. gondii infection in Black-capped, Wild Red Dog, Lemur, zebra, Red panda, Peacock, Red-crowned Crane, Budgerigar, Black-billed Magpie, Zebra Finch in China, which indicated these animals could be served as a potential source of infection for other animals and even humans.

PCR-RFLP method is frequently used to identify differences between homologous DNA sequences (13,15), which have been successfully used for genotyping of T. gondii from cat, chicken, human, cougar, sheep, birds, sparrow, pig and other animals (2, 9, 13, 1518, 26). Further genotyped the positive samples using Multi-locus PCR-RFLP method showed that 3 distinct genotypes (ToxoDB Genotype #9, #2 and #10) of T. gondii from Black-capped (Cebus apella), Peacock (Peafowl) and Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) respectively were identified (Table 2). Zoo animals and pet birds have formed a huge industry in order to prevent rare wild animals from extinction and to boost the economy. Fujian province has a great advantage in convenient transportation because of its southeast coastal location in China, so the exchange of wild animals and pet birds becomes more ordinary. The results in this present study will enhance our understanding of the epidemiology and prevention of T. gondii in zoo wild animals and pet birds.

One sample isolated from Budgerigar belonged to ToxoDB Genotype #10, supporting the previous study that ToxoDB Genotype #10 had been isolated from 3 sparrows in Fuzhou (18). One sample isolated from Black-capped belonged to ToxoDB Genotype #9. This result indicated that ToxoDB Genotype #9 was predominant not only in southern, southwestern and central parts of China but also in southeast part of China (15, 17, 30–32). In addition, our finding support that ToxoDB Genotype #9 is at CS3 locus. One sample isolated from Common Peafowl belonged to ToxoDB Type III Genotype #2. A few Type III genotypes were detected (13, 33). This is the first finding, revealing that Type III variant occurs in China. Our study is also the first report of genetic typing of T. gondii from zoo wild animals and pet birds in china. The high genetic diversity of T. gondii genotypes in Fujian may cause by the high number of cats in city and other feline in mountainous areas.

Conclusion

The positive rate of T. gondii DNA was high in zoo animals (7/45, 15.56%) but very low in birds (3/140, 2.14%) in Fujian, China. Further genotyping analysis confirmed that the presence of T. gondii in zoo wildlife and pet birds were ToxoDB Genotype #10, Genotype #9 and Genotype #2, which suggested the integrated measures should be taken to prevent T. gondii infection in humans or other animals.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Donghui Zhou for his excellent technical support. This project was provided by Fujian Provincial Education Department of Science and Technology (No: JK2011052 and No: JA12316), Longyan Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (No: 2012LY45), Fuzhou Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (No: 2014-S-140). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. 2nd, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, New York: 2010; 1– 313 [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rajendran C, Su C, Dubey JP. Molecular genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii from Central and South America revealed high diversity within and between populations. Infect Genet Evol. 2012; 12 (2): 359– 368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Weiss LM, Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis: A history of clinical observations. Int J Parasitol. 2009; 39 (8): 895– 901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Salant H, Weingram T, Spira DT, Eizenberg T. An outbreak of Toxoplasmosis amongst squirrel monkeys in an Israeli monkey colony. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 159 (1): 24– 29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Murata K. A serological survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in zoo animals and other animals. Jpn J Vet Sci. 1989; 51 (5): 935– 940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang SY, Wei MX, Zhou ZY, Yu JY, Shi XQ. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in the sera of rare wildlife in the Shanghai Zoological Garden, People's Republic of China. Parasitol Int. 2000; 49 (2): 171– 174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Silvia de Camps, Dubey JP, Saville WJA. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii in Zoo Animals in Selected Zoos in the Midwestern United States. J Parasitol. 2008; 94 (3): 648– 653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gennari SM, Ogrzewalska M, Soares HS, Saraiva DG, Pinter A, Labruna MB, Dubey JP. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in birds from the Atlantic Forest, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 200 (1): 193– 197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cong W, Huang SY, Zhou DH, Zhang XX, Zhang NZ, Zhao Q, Zhu XQ. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in Lanzhou, China. Korean J Parasitol. 2013; 51 (3): 363– 367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Howe DK, Honoré S, Derouin F, Sibley D. Determination of genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii strains isolated from patients with toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35 (6): 1411– 1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Grigg ME, Ganatra J, Boothroyd JC, Margolls TP. Unusual Abundance of Atypical Strains Associated with Human Ocular Toxoplasmosis. J Infect Dis. 2001; 184 (5): 633– 639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Khan A, Su C, German M, Storch GA, Clifford DB, Sibley D. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii Strains from Immunocompromised Patients Reveals High Prevalence of Type I Strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43 (12): 5881– 5887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Su C, Zhang X, Dubey JP. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii by multilocus PCR-RFLP markers: A high resolution and simple method for identification of parasites. Int J Parasitol. 2006; 36 (7): 841– 848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Su C, Shwab EK, Zhou P, Zhu XQ, Dubey JP. Moving towards an integrated approach to molecular detection and identification of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitol. 2010; 137 (01): 1– 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dubey JP, Zhu XQ, Sundar N, Zhang H, Kwok OC, Su C. Genetic and biologic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates of cats from China. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 145 (3): 352– 356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jiang HH, Qin SY, Wang W, He B, Hu TS, Wu JM, Fan QS, Tu CC, Liu Q, Zhu XQ. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii infection in bats in southern China. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 203 (3): 318– 321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhou P, Zhang H, Lin RQ, DL, Song HQ, Su C, Zhu XQ. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from China. Parasitol Int. 2009; 58 (2): 193– 195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Huang SY, Cong W, Zhou P, Zhou DH, Wu SM, Xu MJ, Zou FC, Song HQ, Zhu XQ. First report of genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from wild birds in China. J Parasitol. 2012; 98 (3): 681– 682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tian YM, Huang SY, Miao Q, Jiang HH, Yang JF, Su C, Zhu XQ, Zou FC. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from cats in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7: 178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd JC. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1989; 27 (8): 1787– 1792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Jones CD, Okhravi N, Adamson P, Tasker S, Lightman S. Comparison of PCR detection methods for B1, P30, and 18S rDNA genes of Toxoplasma gondii in aqueous humor. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 2000; 41 (3): 634– 644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pena HF, Gennari SM, Dubey JP, Su C. Population structure and mouse-virulence of Toxoplasma gondii in Brazil. Int J Parasitol. 2008; 38 (5): 561– 569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Buchbinder S, Blatz R, Rodloff AC. Comparison of real-time PCR detection methods for B1 and P30 genes of Toxoplasma gondii. Diagn Micr Infect Dis. 2003; 45 (4): 269– 271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Switaj K, Master A, Skrzypczak M, Zaborowski P. Recent trends in molecular diagnostics for Toxoplasma gondii infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005; 11 (3): 170– 176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gutierrez J, O'Donovan J, Williams E, Proctor A, Brady C, Marques PX. Detection and quantification of Toxoplasma gondii in ovine maternal and foetal tissues from experimentally infected pregnant ewes using real-time PCR. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 172 (1): 8– 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Quan JH, Kim TY, Choi IU, Lee YH. Genotyping of a Korean isolate of Toxoplasma gondii by multilocus PCR-RFLP and microsatellite analysis. Korean J Parasitol. 2008; 46 (2): 105– 108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kompalic-Cristo A, Frotta C, Suárez-Mutis M, Fernandes O, Britto C. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay based on the repetitive B1 gene for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in human peripheral blood. Parasitol Res. 2007; 101 (3): 619– 625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Putignani L, Mancinelli L, Del Chierico F, Menichella D, Adlerstein D, Angelici MC, Marangi M, Berrilli F, Caffara M, di Regalbono DA, Giangaspero A. Investigation of Toxoplasma gondii presence in farmed shellfish by nested-PCR and real-time PCR fluorescent amplicon generation assay (FLAG). Exp Parasitol. 2011; 127 (2): 409– 417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhao DY, Huan CQ, Wang K, Wen FL, Yue LP, Wang SK, Lin X. Comparison on Totoplasma gondii detection by triple SYBR Green I real-time PCR and ELISA. Chinese J Zoonoses. 2013; 29(5): 476–481. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhou P, Nie H, Zhang LX, Wang HY, Yin CC, Su C, Zhu XQ, Zhao JL. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs in China. J Parasitol. 2010; 96 (5): 1027– 1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zhou P, Sun XT, Yin CC, Yang JF, Yuan ZG, Yan HK, Zhu XQ, Zou FC. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs in southwestern China. J Parasitol. 2011; 97 (6): 1193– 1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chen ZW, Gao JM, Huo XX, Wang L, Yu L, Halm-Lai F, Xu YH, Song WJ, Hide G, Shen JL, Lun ZR. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from cats in different geographic regions of China. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 183 (1): 166– 170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Velmurugan GV, Dubey JP, Su C. Genotyping studies of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from Africa revealed that the archetypal clonal lineages predominate as in North America and Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 155 (3): 314– 318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES