“Nanoparticles for Imaging: Top or Flop?” Radiology 2014;273(1):10–28
Page 10, bottom, left-hand column, In the affiliations footnote, after “final version accepted November 6,” the information should have read as follows: F.K. and T.L. supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; F.K. supported by NRW/EU-Ziel 2-Programm (Europäischer Fonds für Regionale Entwicklung 2007-2013: Entwicklung und Bildgebung patienten-optimierter Implantate), Exploratory Research Space Boost Fund at Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, and the Helmholtz Society Portfolio Program (Technologie and Medizin: Multimodale Bildgebung zur Aufklärung des In-vivo-Verhaltens von polymeren Biomaterialien); J.G. was supported by Louis V. Gerstner Young Investigator Award and U.S. Department of Defense Program (PC1116670; opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the funding agency); and T.L. supported by European Research Council (starting grant 309495: NeoNaNo). Page 11, bottom, right-hand column, a Funding line should have been included as follows: This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants 1R01EB014944–01 and P30 CA08748).
Editor’s Note: We stress to authors and research groups the importance to paying attention to manuscripts in the varied stages of acceptance written by any member of the group, to keep track of previously published patients and imaging studies, and to ensure that all figures are original unpublished material unless appropriately referenced with permission granted for reproduction.