Skip to main content
PMC home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1996 Aug;51(8):835–840. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.8.835

Inhalational drug delivery from seven different spacer devices.

P W Barry 1, C O'Callaghan 1
PMCID: PMC472565  PMID: 8795674

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A study was performed to determine in vitro the difference in drug output of seven currently available spacer devices when used with different inhaled medications. METHODS: A glass multistage liquid impinger (MSLI) was used to determine the amount of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG, 5 mg), salbutamol (100 micrograms), or budesonide (200 micrograms) obtained in various particle size ranges from metered dose inhalers (MDIs) actuated directly into the MSLI or via one of seven different spacer devices; the Fisonair, Nebuhaler, Volumatic, Inspirease, Aerochamber, Aerosol Cloud Enhancer, and Dynahaler. RESULTS: In particles smaller than 5 microns in diameter the dose of DSCG recovered from the Fisonair and Nebuhaler was 118% and 124%, respectively, of that recovered using the MDI alone. The dose recovered from the smaller volume spacers was 90% (Inspirease), 36% (Aerochamber), 33% (Aerosol Cloud Enhancer), and 21% (Dynahaler) of that from the MDI alone. The Volumatic increased the amount of salbutamol in particles smaller than 5 microns to 117% of that from the MDI, and the Inspirease and Aerochamber spacers decreased it by nearly 50%. The amount of budesonide in small particles recovered after use of the Nebuhaler, Inspirease, and the Aerochamber was 92%, 101%, and 78%, respectively, of that from the MDI alone. CONCLUSIONS: Under the test conditions used, large volume spacers such as the Fisonair, Nebuhaler, and Volumatic delivered significantly more DSCG and salbutamol than the smaller spacers tested. The differences between spacers were less for budesonide than the other medications studied. This study shows that there are significant differences in the amount of drug available for inhalation when different spacers are used as inhalational aids with different drugs. Spacer devices need to be fully evaluated for each drug prescribed for them.

Full text

PDF
835

Images in this article

838Image
on p.838
838Image
on p.838
838Image
on p.838
838Image
on p.838

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry P. W., Robertson C. F., O'Callaghan C. Optimum use of a spacer device. Arch Dis Child. 1993 Dec;69(6):693–694. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.6.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crimi N., Palermo F., Cacopardo B., Vancheri C., Oliveri R., Palermo B., Mistretta A. Bronchodilator effect of Aerochamber and Inspirease in comparison with metered dose inhaler. Eur J Respir Dis. 1987 Sep;71(3):153–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cushley M. J., Lewis R. A., Tattersfield A. E. Comparison of three techniques of inhalation on the airway response to terbutaline. Thorax. 1983 Dec;38(12):908–913. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.12.908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dhand R., Sethi D. S. Bronchodilator effect of terbutaline aerosol in asthmatic: comparison of two spacer devices. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1990 Apr-Jun;32(2):101–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dolovich M., Ruffin R., Corr D., Newhouse M. T. Clinical evaluation of a simple demand inhalation MDI aerosol delivery device. Chest. 1983 Jul;84(1):36–41. doi: 10.1378/chest.84.1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Everard M. L., Clark A. R., Milner A. D. Drug delivery from holding chambers with attached facemask. Arch Dis Child. 1992 May;67(5):580–585. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.5.580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuller H. D. Comparison of two chamber devices in patients using a metered-dose inhaler with satisfactory technique. CMAJ. 1986 Sep 15;135(6):625–629. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gurwitz D., Levison H., Mindorff C., Reilly P., Worsley G. Assessment of a new device (aerochamber) for use with aerosol drugs in asthmatic children. Ann Allergy. 1983 Mar;50(3):166–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodges I. G., Milner A. D., Stokes G. M. Assessment of a new device for delivering aerosol drugs to asthmatic children. Arch Dis Child. 1981 Oct;56(10):787–789. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.10.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim C. S., Eldridge M. A., Sackner M. A. Oropharyngeal deposition and delivery aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Jan;135(1):157–164. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.1.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kvale P. A. Transbronchial needle aspiration. Is it coming of age? Chest. 1985 Aug;88(2):161–162. doi: 10.1378/chest.88.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee H., Evans H. E. Evaluation of inhalation aids of metered dose inhalers in asthmatic children. Chest. 1987 Mar;91(3):366–369. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.3.366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levison H., Reilly P. A., Worsley G. H. Spacing devices and metered-dose inhalers in childhood asthma. J Pediatr. 1985 Nov;107(5):662–668. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80389-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lulling J., Delwiche J. P., Hidinger K. G., Prignot J. Influence of different extension-actuator tubes on the bronchodilation effect of a terbutaline sulfate aerosol. Eur J Respir Dis. 1983 Jan;64(1):33–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Newman S. P., Millar A. B., Lennard-Jones T. R., Morén F., Clarke S. W. Improvement of pressurised aerosol deposition with Nebuhaler spacer device. Thorax. 1984 Dec;39(12):935–941. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.12.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Callaghan C., Lynch J., Cant M., Robertson C. Improvement in sodium cromoglycate delivery from a spacer device by use of an antistatic lining, immediate inhalation, and avoiding multiple actuations of drug. Thorax. 1993 Jun;48(6):603–606. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.6.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Selroos O., Halme M. Effect of a volumatic spacer and mouth rinsing on systemic absorption of inhaled corticosteroids from a metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler. Thorax. 1991 Dec;46(12):891–894. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.12.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sennhauser F. H., Sly P. D. Pressure flow characteristics of the valve in spacer devices. Arch Dis Child. 1989 Sep;64(9):1305–1307. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.9.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stahlhofen W., Gebhart J., Heyder J. Experimental determination of the regional deposition of aerosol particles in the human respiratory tract. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1980 Jun;41(6):385–98a. doi: 10.1080/15298668091424933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES