Abstract
AIM: The finding that some Helicobacter pylori strains express Lewis b (Leb) blood group antigen casts a doubt on the role of Leb of human gastric epithelium being a receptor for H. pylori. The aim of this study was to determine if expression of Leb in H. pylori interferes with bacterial adhesion property.
METHODS: Bacterial adhesion to immobilized Leb on microtitre plate was performed in 63 H. pylori strains obtained from Singapore using in vitro adherence assay. Expression of Lewis blood group antigens was determined by ELISA assay.
RESULTS: Among 63 H. pylori strains, 28 expressed Leb antigen. In vitro adhesion assay showed that 78.6% (22/28) of Leb-positive and 74.3% (26/35) of Leb-negative H. pylori isolates were positive for adhesion to immobilized Leb coated on microtitre plate (P = 0.772). In addition, blocking of H. pylori Leb by prior incubation with anti-Leb monoclonal antibody did not alter the binding of the bacteria to solid-phase coated Leb.
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that expression of Leb in H. pylori does not interfere with the bacterial adhesion property. This result supports the notion that Leb present on human gastric epithelial cells is capable of being a receptor for H. pylori.
INTRODUCTION
Helicobacter pylori is the major etiologic agent of chronic active gastritis, and is generally accepted as a causative factor in the pathogenesis of gastritis, peptic ulcer (PU) disease and gastric adenocarcinoma[1-3]. It is estimated that over 50% of the world’s population are infected with H. pylori.
The bacterium shows a strict tropism for gastric epithelium and is usually isolated from gastric epithelium and duodenal mucosa with gastric metaplasia. The presence of specific receptors for H. pylori on the gastric mucosa may explain its gastric tropism. The Lewisb (Leb) blood group antigen has been reported to be a receptor of H. pylori, and the blood-group antigen-binding adhesin, BabA, has been shown to mediate binding of H. pylori to human Leb on gastric epithelium[4]. Following the finding that Leb was expressed in some strains of H. pylori[5], the role of host Leb as a receptor for H. pylori has been questioned considering the H. pylori lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Leb may interfere with the interaction between the bacteria BabA and Leb on gastric epithelium[5,6]. This may be more important for the Asian strains where there is a higher frequency of H. pylori strains expressing type 1 blood-group antigens (Lea, Leb) (43.5% for Leb)[7,8] comparing with Western strains (< 10% for Leb). The high frequency of Leb expression in H. pylori strains in our population offers a unique opportunity to investigate the potential influence of Leb in H. pylori on the bacterial adhesion property.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and H. pylori isolates
H. pylori strains were isolated from the gastric biopsies of 108 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for dyspepsia at the National University Hospital, Singapore. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients for gastroscopy and biopsies. A subset of 63 H. pylori strains from these 108 strains which were performed in our previous study[8] was randomly chosen for the in vitro adherence assay. Of these, 36 were isolated from male patients and 27 were from female patients. The average age of the patients was 43 years (16-78 years). Based on endoscopic and histologic examination, the patients were classified into the following groups: peptic ulcer (n = 33), and chronic gastritis (n = 30). The bacteria were isolated and identified as described previously[8]. Each strain was cultured on chocolate agar for 3-4 days at 37 °C in a humid incubator (Forma Scientific, Mountain View, USA) supplemented with 5% CO2.
In vitro adherence assay
The adherence assay was performed according to Gerhard et al[9] with minor modifications. Briefly, for each of the 63 H. pylori strains, the 4-day-old culture was harvested and washed twice in 0.05 M carbonate buffer (pH9.6) before resuspending in 1 mL of the same buffer. A 10 µl of 10 mg·mL-1of digoxigenin (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) solution was added to the bacterial suspension and incubated for 60 min at RT. Polysorb 96-well-microtiter plates (Nunc, Rochester, USA) were coated with 50 ng per well of Lea, Leb, Lex and Ley, (IsoSep, Tullinge, Sweden) in 50 µl of 0.05 M carbonate buffer (pH9.6) while 50 µl of the same buffer was added as negative control. Following overnight incubation at RT, the solution was decanted without washing, and 100 µl of blocking buffer (0.5% non-fat milk/0.2% Tween-20) was added. After the plate was further incubated at RT for 1 h, the solution was decanted without washing, and then 50 µl of digoxigenin labeled bacteria diluted to an OD of 0.5 at 600 nm were added to each well of the plates and incubated for another 1 h at RT with gentle agitation. After washing with PBS, 50 µl of 150 mU·mL-1 of anti-digoxigenin-HRP antibody (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was added and incubated for 1 h at RT. The plates were washed 3 times with PBS before adding 50 µl of o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma, Louis, USA) (0.4 mg·mL-1 in citric acid buffer with 0.025% H2O2). The reaction was stopped with the addition of 2.5 M sulfuric acid. The OD value was read at 490 nm in an ELISA reader (Bio-Tek, Houston, USA). The strains were considered positive for adhesion to the antigen if the ratio of ODAg/ODcontrol was > 2.0[9]. The assay was carried out in duplicate for all the strains tested.
Lewis antigen expression
The expression of Lewis blood group antigens (Lea, Leb, Lex and Ley) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously[8,10]. The following murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were used: mAb 54-1F6A, specific for Lewisx (Lex); mAb 1E52, specific for Ley; mAb 7Le, specific for Lea and mAb 225Le, specific for Leb. Bacterial whole cells from 3-day cultures (7.5 × 106 mL-1) were suspended in 1 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH7.4. One hundred mL of suspension was added to each well of 96-well microtitre plate (Nunc, Rochester, USA) and incubated overnight at room temperature (RT). Plates were then washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST). Subsequently, an aliquot of 100 mL of mAbs (100 ng·mL-1) was added and incubated overnight at RT. After washing three times with PBST, a 100 mL solution of 1:1000 horseradish peroxidase-labelled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted in PBST with 0.5% goat serum was added. Color development occurred with the addition of H2O2 and o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) in phosphate citrate buffer (pH5.4) in the dark for 30 min at RT. A 50 mL of 2.5 M H2SO4 solution was added to each well to stop the reaction. The optical density (OD) was read at 490 nm. OD of 0.2 was chosen as the cut-off value because the sum of non-specific background binding value for mAbs never exceeded an OD of 0.1. Synthetic protein-linked Lewis antigens, i.e., Lea, Leb, Lex and Ley (IsoSep, Tullinge, Sweden) were used as positive controls for the mAbs.
Adherence blocking assay by anti-Leb mAb
To test if blocking LPS Leb would alter the binding of the bacteria to Leb on ELISA plate, two chemically characterized strains with Leb (H428 and H507)[7] were subjected to adherence blocking assay by incubation with mAb 225Le, specific for Leb[8,11]. The bacteria were incubated with 225Le mAb (1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 µg·mL-1) for 1 h at RT, and then washed twice with PBST (PBS + 0.05% Tween-20). The adherence assay was performed as described earlier.
Statistical analysis
Frequencies were compared using 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test (SPSS 9.0, Chicago, USA). The rations of OD values were expressed as means ± standard deviations, and the distributions of the ratios were compared by using Student’s t test for comparison of means of independent samples. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
In vitro adherence assay
Of the 63 H. pylori strains tested, 48 (76.2%) were positive for adhesion to immobilized Leb antigen on microtitre plate. The positive H. pylori strains showed ratios of ODAg/ODcontrol between 2.0-4.1 while the negative strains exhibited values between 0.89-1.67. None of the H. pylori strains bound to Lea, Lex or Ley.
Effect of Leb expression in H. pylori on bacterial adhesion property
In the test for expression of Lewis antigen in H. pylori, 28 out of the 63 H. pylori strains expressed Leb while 35 did not express Leb based on ELISA. Among these 28 Leb-positive strains, 22 (78.6%) were positive for adhesion to immobilized Leb antigen coated on plate as compared to 26 (74.3%) of 35 Leb-negative strains (P = 0.772). Furthermore, the ratio of ODAg/ODcontrol was not significant difference between LPS Leb-positive strains and Leb-negative strains (2.3 ± 0.7 vs 2.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.988).
Adherence blocking assay by anti-Leb mAb
Two chemically characterized Leb positive H. pylori strains H428 and H507[7] were subjected to adherence blocking assay by prior incubation with the bacteria with specific mAb 225Le (100.0 µg·mL-1). The ratio of ODAg/ODcontrol for strain H428 was changed from 2.7 to 2.6 after incubation with mAb 225Le. The value of adhesion assay for strain H507 was showed minimal change from 1.1 to 1.0. No difference of the ratio of ODAg/ODcontrol was observed when the bacteria were incubated with different concentrations (1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 µg·mL-1) of mAb 225Le, which suggested that Leb expression in H. pylori did not interfere with the bacterial adhesion to Leb.
Effect of mixed Lewis expression on bacterial adhesion property
Of the 63 H. pylori strains tested, 55 expressed 2 or more Lewis antigens (Lea, Le b, Lex or Ley), and the remaining 8 strains expressed 1 Lewis antigen. Among the 55 strains with expression of 2 or more Lewis antigens, 42 (76.4%) were positive for adhesion to immobilized Leb compared with 6 (75%) of 8 strains with 1 Lewis antigen expression (P = 1.000). Furthermore, the ratio of ODAg/ODcontrol was not significant difference between the strains with expression of 2 or more Lewis antigen and strains with 1 Lewis antigen (2.3 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.8, P = 0.836).
DISCUSSION
Attachment of H. pylori to gastric epithelium is important for its colonization and survival. This adhesion property protects the bacteria from the displacement from the stomach by gastric emptying and peristalsis[12]. A recent study has demonstrated that the H. pylori blood-group antigen-binding adhesin, BabA, facilitates bacterial colonization and augments a nonspecific immune response[13]. The fucosylated blood group antigens of Leb and H type 1 have been proposed as receptors of H. pylori[4]. In addition, a study using transgenic mice expressing the human Leb epitope in gastric epithelial cells indicated that Leb antigen functioned as a receptor for H. pylori adhesin and mediated its attachment to gastric pit and surface mucous cells. However, following the observation[5] that some H. pylori strains also express Leb, the question on the possible role of host Leb as a receptor for H. pylori has been raised by Wirth et al[5] as well as Clyne and Drumm[6]. Furthermore, if host Leb is the principle receptor for H. pylori, one might then expect a decreased prevalence of H. pylori in the secretor subjects because Leb present in saliva or gastric mucus in secretor individuals would competitively inhibit the binding of H. pylori. However, numerous studies have shown that there is no association between prevalence of H. pylori and host secretor status[14], which indicates that competitive inhibition by Leb in gastric mucus in secretor individuals may not be able to effectively prevent the colonization of H. pylori.
In this study, it was shown that there was no significant difference between Leb-positive and Leb-negative H. pylori strains with respect to their ability to adhere to immobilized Leb, mimicking the epithelial cell Leb antigen. This suggests that expression of Leb in H. pylori strains in our study population does not interfere with the bacterial adhesion to immobilized Leb in vitro. Furthermore, the blocking experiment using anti-Leb mAb on two Leb expressing strains (H428 and H507) showed that the expression of Leb in H. pylori had no effect on the adhesion property of H. pylori. Additionally, our study population are mainly of Chinese origin which are predominantly Le (b+) phenotype[8], and H. pylori strains isolated from Asian population have a tendency to express type 1 Lewis antigen (Lea and Leb)[7,8]. However, a high prevalence of H. pylori infection has been found in this population. These data further support our observation that expression of Leb in H. pylori does not affect the bacterial adhesion.
Our previous study found that increased expression of Lewis antigens in H. pylori was associated with peptic ulceration in our population[8]. We, therefore, attempted to determine whether strains with Lewis antigen expression have advantage for binding to immobilized Leb, but only observed that the increased expression of a combination of Le antigens in H. pylori had no influence on bacterial adhesion.
The chemical structures of Lea, Leb, Lex, Le y, iantigen, H type 1 and blood group A antigens expressed by H. pylori have been elucidated[7,15,16]. These antigens are also expressed on gastric mucosa[14]. The possible interaction between Lewis antigens expressed by H. pylori and gastric epithelium is intriguing. Lex-Lex homotypic interaction has been found to be important in eukaryotic cell interaction, and Lex structure has recently been proven to be involved in the formation of adhesion pedestal between H. pylori and gastric epithelium[14]. More recently, Lex structure in H. pylori has been demonstrated to promote the bacterial adhesion to gastric epithelium[17]. However, Leb-Leb homotypic interaction has not been proven, and our in vitro study does not support such an interaction of H. pylori LPS Leb with epithelial Leb. The next question is how a H. pylori population can manage to exist as single bacterium in vivo but not autoaggregative, when bacterium expresses both BabA adhesin and Leb H. pylori lectins such as BabA may evolve an ability to distinguish between host and bacterial ligands based on differences in their core structure, and thus avoid bacterial autoaggregation[18,19].
In conclusion, expression of Leb blood group antigen in H. pylori strains in our Asian population does not interfere with the bacterial adhesion to immobilized Leb on microtitre plate. This result supports the notion that host Leb present on the gastric epithelium is capable of being a receptor for H. pylori.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to Dr. Ben J. Appelmelk (Amsterdam Free University, The Netherlands) for generously providing all the monoclonal antibodies. We thank Dr. Mario A. Monteiro (Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada) for analyzing the chemical structures of the H. pylori strains. This work was partly present in the European Helicobacter pylori 2000 conference in Rome, Italy.
Footnotes
Supported by a grant from the National University of Singapore, No. 6431
Edited by Zhang JZ
References
- 1.Hunt RH, Sumanac K, Huang JQ. Review article: should we kill or should we save Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15 Suppl 1:51–59. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cai L, Yu SZ, Zhang ZF. Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of gastric cancer in Changle County,Fujian Province,China. World J Gastroenterol. 2000;6:374–376. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v6.i3.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Schlemper RJ. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784–789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa001999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ilver D, Arnqvist A, Ogren J, Frick IM, Kersulyte D, Incecik ET, Berg DE, Covacci A, Engstrand L, Borén T. Helicobacter pylori adhesin binding fucosylated histo-blood group antigens revealed by retagging. Science. 1998;279:373–377. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wirth HP, Yang M, Karita M, Blaser MJ. Expression of the human cell surface glycoconjugates Lewis x and Lewis y by Helicobacter pylori isolates is related to cagA status. Infect Immun. 1996;64:4598–4605. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.11.4598-4605.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clyne M, Drumm B. Absence of effect of Lewis A and Lewis B expression on adherence of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric cells. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:72–80. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Monteiro MA, Zheng P, Ho B, Yokota S, Amano K, Pan Z, Berg DE, Chan KH, MacLean LL, Perry MB. Expression of histo-blood group antigens by lipopolysaccharides of Helicobacter pylori strains from asian hosts: the propensity to express type 1 blood-group antigens. Glycobiology. 2000;10:701–713. doi: 10.1093/glycob/10.7.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zheng PY, Hua J, Yeoh KG, Ho B. Association of peptic ulcer with increased expression of Lewis antigens but not cagA, iceA, and vacA in Helicobacter pylori isolates in an Asian population. Gut. 2000;47:18–22. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gerhard M, Lehn N, Neumayer N, Borén T, Rad R, Schepp W, Miehlke S, Classen M, Prinz C. Clinical relevance of the Helicobacter pylori gene for blood-group antigen-binding adhesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12778–12783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zheng PY, Hua J, Ng HC, Ho B. Unchanged characteristics of Helicobacter pylori during its morphological conversion. Microbios. 1999;98:51–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Appelmelk BJ, Monteiro MA, Martin SL, Moran AP, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM. Why Helicobacter pylori has Lewis antigens. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8:565–570. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01875-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Falk PG, Syder AJ, Guruge JL, Kirschner D, Blaser MJ, Gordon JI. Theoretical and experimental approaches for studying factors defining the Helicobacter pylori-host relationship. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8:321–329. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01780-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rad R, Gerhard M, Lang R, Schöniger M, Rösch T, Schepp W, Becker I, Wagner H, Prinz C. The Helicobacter pylori blood group antigen-binding adhesin facilitates bacterial colonization and augments a nonspecific immune response. J Immunol. 2002;168:3033–3041. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.3033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Taylor DE, Rasko DA, Sherburne R, Ho C, Jewell LD. Lack of correlation between Lewis antigen expression by Helicobacter pylori and gastric epithelial cells in infected patients. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:1113–1122. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70082-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Monteiro MA, Chan KH, Rasko DA, Taylor DE, Zheng PY, Appelmelk BJ, Wirth HP, Yang M, Blaser MJ, Hynes SO, et al. Simultaneous expression of type 1 and type 2 Lewis blood group antigens by Helicobacter pylori lipopolysaccharides. Molecular mimicry between h. pylori lipopolysaccharides and human gastric epithelial cell surface glycoforms. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:11533–11543. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.19.11533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Monteiro MA, Appelmelk BJ, Rasko DA, Moran AP, Hynes SO, MacLean LL, Chan KH, Michael FS, Logan SM, O'Rourke J, et al. Lipopolysaccharide structures of Helicobacter pylori genomic strains 26695 and J99, mouse model H. pylori Sydney strain, H. pylori P466 carrying sialyl Lewis X, and H. pylori UA915 expressing Lewis B classification of H. pylori lipopolysaccharides into glycotype families. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:305–320. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Edwards NJ, Monteiro MA, Faller G, Walsh EJ, Moran AP, Roberts IS, High NJ. Lewis X structures in the O antigen side-chain promote adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to the gastric epithelium. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:1530–1539. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karlsson KA. The human gastric colonizer Helicobacter pylori: a challenge for host-parasite glycobiology. Glycobiology. 2000;10:761–771. doi: 10.1093/glycob/10.8.761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Falk P. Why does Helicobacter pylori actually have Lewis antigens. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:61–62. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01935-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]