Abstract
Clinical pharmacogenetics, the use of genetic data to guide drug therapy decisions, is beginning to be used for medications commonly prescribed by family physicians. However, clinicians are largely unfamiliar with principles supporting clinical use of this type of data. For example, genetic variability in the cytochrome P450 2D6 drug metabolizing enzyme can alter the clinical effects of some opioid analgesics (e.g., codeine, tramadol), whereas variability in the CYP2C19 enzyme affects the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel. If testing is performed, patients who are ultrarapid or poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 should avoid codeine use (and possibly tramadol, hydrocodone, and oxycodone) because of the potential for increased toxicity or lack of effectiveness. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes who are known to be poor metabolizers of CYP2C19 should consider alternate antiplatelet therapy (e.g., ticagrelor, prasugrel). Some guidelines are available that address appropriate drug therapy changes, and others are in development. Additionally, a number of clinical resources are emerging to support family physicians in the use of pharmacogenetics. When used appropriately, pharmacogenetic testing can be a practical tool to optimize drug therapy and avoid medication adverse effects.
Clinical pharmacogenetics determines whether individual differences in the expression of a protein or enzyme affect the metabolism of a drug. These effects may lead to changes in the levels of active or inactive metabolites, possibly warranting the use of a different drug or dose.1 Family physicians are usually the first resource for patient questions about genetics; however, quick and accurate use of pharmacogenetic data in a clinical environment is challenging.2 Patients have increasing interest in and access to their own genetic information, including pharmacogenetic data from direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies (e.g., 23andMe).3 With pharmacogenetic information on the labels of more than 150 drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), family physicians should have some knowledge of how to find and apply this information.4 eTable A lists resources for more information.
Few primary care physicians are comfortable ordering a pharmacogenetic test or interpreting test results,5,6 often citing a general lack of education in this area.6 This article presents recommendations for two well-studied gene-drug pairs to illustrate the type of information and evidence needed to apply pharmacogenetic data clinically.
Basics of Pharmacogenetic Variability and Terminology
Table 1 includes definitions of commonly used pharmacogenetic terms.7 Much of the available and clinically relevant pharmacogenetic information stems from variations in genes that code for drug metabolizing enzymes (e.g., cytochrome P450 2C19 and clopidogrel [Plavix]), or those that alter a drug’s ability to act in the body or the body’s response to a drug (e.g., VKORC1 and warfarin [Coumadin]). The most common type of genetic variation (or polymorphism) is a single nucleotide polymorphism. The presence of specific variants at certain single nucleotide polymorphisms or other polymorphisms can lead to different versions of a gene, or alleles. As with many other genetic traits, individuals usually inherit one allele from each parent. These inherited alleles govern expression of the gene and the corresponding enzyme or protein.8
Table 1.
Definitions of Common Pharmacogenetic Terms
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Allele | One of two or more versions of a gene; an individual inherits two alleles for each gene, one from each parent; if the two alleles are the same (e.g., CYP2C19*1/*1), the individual is homozygous for that gene; if the alleles are different (e.g., CYP2C19*1/*2), the individual is heterozygous |
| Gene | Basic physical and functional unit of heredity |
| Genotype | An individual’s collection of genes |
| Pharmacogenetics (also called pharmacogenomics) | Study of how genes affect the way a person responds to medications; pharmacogenetics is being used to determine ahead of time the best drug or dose for an individual patient |
| Phenotype | Clinical presentation or observable characteristics of an individual with a particular genotype |
| Polymorphism | Natural variation in a gene, DNA sequence, or chromosome |
| Single nucleotide polymorphism | Type of polymorphism involving variation of a single base pair in the human genome |
| Star allele nomenclature | Common format used to represent variability of a specific gene; signified as gene symbol, *allele number/*allele number (e.g., CYP2C19*1/*2) |
CYP = cytochrome P450.
Information from reference 7.
Pharmacogenetics employs a “star allele” naming system for many genes, in which the normal or reference allele is referred to as wild type and given a designation of *1. A variant allele is usually designated with a * followed by a number other than one to distinguish it from other variants. For example, a patient who carries two wild-type alleles for CYP2C19 would be designated as having a CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype, which is associated with normal CYP2C19 activity (this activity level is the patient’s phenotype).8
This genetic variability leads to clinical effects when it changes how drugs are processed or activated in the body. For some genes and drugs, there is evidence to support an association between genetic variability and changes in drug levels or effects. For example, carriage of two reduced-function (or loss-of-function) CYP2C19 alleles, such as CYP2C19*2/*2, is associated with poor metabolization and relatively low CYP2C19 activity. Clopidogrel is a prodrug and requires activation by CYP2C19 to become a bioactive drug. Therefore, patients with this “poor metabolizer” phenotype have reduced active clopidogrel metabolites and higher on-treatment platelet aggregation compared with carriers of CYP2C19*1/*1.8,9
Clinical Implications of Pharmacogenetic Testing
The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium provides guidance on interpreting genetic test results.10 Additional recommendations are available from the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group and the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention working group, and disease-specific guidance is provided in guidelines from various professional associations.11,12
CYP2D6 AND OPIOIDS
Codeine and morphine exert their analgesic effects through interaction at the μ-opioid receptor. The affinity of codeine for this receptor is approximately 200-fold weaker than that of morphine.13,14 As a result, codeine’s analgesic properties primarily come from its bioactivation in the liver to morphine via the CYP2D6 enzyme.13,15
CYP2D6 enzyme activity is highly variable because of single nucleotide polymorphisms and other alterations of the CYP2D6 gene.13,14 In approximately 90% of patients, codeine metabolism by CYP2D6 results in expected amounts of morphine formation. However, approximately 1% to 2% of patients are ultrarapid metabolizers, in whom the expected increased formation of morphine leads to a higher toxicity risk. Conversely, the approximately 5% to 10% of patients who are classified as poor metabolizers are at risk of insufficient pain relief with normal codeine dosages.13
A 2006 case report described the death of a breastfed infant of a mother taking codeine.16 The mother was an ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizer, and the infant’s death was attributed to opioid toxicity secondary to morphine excretion into breast milk. Childhood deaths with normal codeine dosages have been attributed to CYP2D6 polymorphism and resulted in an FDA warning against codeine use for postoperative pain control in children undergoing tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy.17 Adverse effects have also been reported in adults with variant CYP2D6 metabolism.18 FDA-approved prescribing information for codeine warns that even at approved dosages, persons who are ultrarapid metabolizers may have life-threatening or fatal respiratory depression or experience signs of overdose, including extreme sleepiness, confusion, and shallow breathing.19
Other opioids such as tramadol, hydrocodone, and oxycodone are also metabolized through CYP2D6 to their active forms. Of these agents, evidence supporting clinically relevant effects of genetic variability is strongest with use of tramadol in poor metabolizers of CYP2D6. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, those who were poor metabolizers were more likely to be nonresponsive to tramadol and required significantly more rescue pain medications postoperatively compared with non–poor metabolizers.20,21
Clinicians should consider CYP2D6 testing in patients who have no response to codeine or tramadol (possible poor metabolizers) or who have unexpected adverse effects (possible ultrarapid metabolizers). Although evidence is limited, clinicians should keep in mind that hydrocodone and oxycodone may not be good alternatives in these patients because they are also activated by this enzyme.13,22 Other factors that may influence optimal drug therapy choices need to be considered, such as concomitant use of drugs that inhibit CYP2D6 (e.g., paroxetine [Paxil]) and risk factors for respiratory depression.13 Numerous other drugs have also been associated with genetic variability in CYP2D6 expression and altered clinical effects (Table 2).9,13,23–30
Table 2.
Interpreting Pharmacogenetic Test Results for Selected Medications Used in Family Practice
| Allele | Medications | Test results* and clinical implications† | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | |||
| CYP2D6 | Codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, tramadol | Ultrarapid metabolizer: Avoid codeine because of potential for toxicity13,23 Poor metabolizer: Avoid codeine and possibly tramadol because of possible lack of effectiveness13,23 |
CPIC guidance limits genotype-guided dosing recommendations to codeine.13 Alternative analgesics not affected by CYP2D6 variability include morphine, oxymorphone, and nonopioid analgesics.13 Oxycodone may also have reduced effectiveness in poor CYP2D6 metabolizers.11,13,23 |
|
| |||
| Cardiovascular (percutaneous coronary intervention) | |||
| CYP2C19 | Clopidogrel (Plavix) | Intermediate metabolizer: Use alternative antiplatelet therapy if no contraindications9 Poor metabolizer: Use alternative antiplatelet therapy if no contraindications9 |
Clopidogrel prescribing information states that CYP2C19 tests can be used as an aid to determine therapeutic strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.24 CPIC guidance limits genotype-guided dosing recommendations to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (excluding medical management of acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and peripheral artery disease).9 ACCF/AHA guidelines state that genotyping may be considered in patients with unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (or after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes) if test results could alter management.25 Alternative antiplatelet therapy not affected by CYP2C19 variability includes prasugrel (Effient) and ticagrelor (Brilinta).9 |
|
| |||
| Depression/psychiatry | |||
| CYP2C19 | Amitriptyline | Poor metabolizer: Consider 50% reduction in recommended starting dose26 | CPIC guidance is available for CYP2D6- and CYP2C19-genotype guided tricyclic antidepressant therapy.26 Although limited data exist for other tricyclic antidepressants, most supporting evidence of clinically relevant gene-drug effects is for amitriptyline and nortriptyline (Pamelor).26 |
|
| |||
| CYP2C19 | Citalopram (Celexa), escitalopram (Lexapro) | Ultrarapid metabolizer: Consider alternative Poor metabolizer: Consider 50% starting dose reduction and titrate to response, or use alternative27 |
CPIC guidance is available for CYP2C19-genotype guided citalopram and escitalopram therapy.27 FDA label for citalopram states that 20 mg per day is the maximum recommended dosage for patients older than 60 years, patients with hepatic impairment, and CYP2C19 poor metabolizers or patients taking cimetidine (Tagamet) or another CYP2C19 inhibitor.28 |
|
| |||
| CYP2C19 | Sertraline (Zoloft) | Ultrarapid metabolizer: If patient does not respond to recommended dose, consider alternative Poor metabolizer: Consider 50% dose reduction or alternative27 |
CPIC guidance is available for CYP2C19-genotype guided sertraline therapy.27 |
|
| |||
| CYP2D6 | Amitriptyline, nortriptyline | Ultrarapid metabolizer: Avoid because of possible lack of effectiveness26 Poor metabolizer: Avoid because of possible adverse effects; if use is warranted, consider 50% reduction in recommended starting dose26 |
CPIC guidance is available for CYP2D6- and CYP2C19-genotype guided tricyclic antidepressant therapy. 26 Although limited data exist for other tricyclic antidepressants, most supporting evidence of clinically relevant gene-drug effects is for amitriptyline and nortriptyline.26 |
|
| |||
| CYP2D6 | Aripiprazole (Abilify) | Poor metabolizer: Decrease dose29 | Quality of supporting evidence is classified as low by PharmGKB.‡ FDA label for aripiprazole states that in poor metabolizers, the usual dose should initially be reduced to 50% and then adjusted to achieve a favorable clinical response; in poor metabolizers receiving a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, the usual dose should be reduced to 25%.29 |
|
| |||
| CYP2D6 | Atomoxetine (Strattera) | Poor metabolizer: Adjust dose30 | Quality of supporting evidence is classified as moderate (Level 2a) by PharmGKB.‡ FDA label for atomoxetine states that in poor metabolizers, the initial dosage should be 0.5 mg per kg per day and then increased to the the usual target dosage of 1.2 mg per kg per day only if symptoms do not improve after 4 weeks and the initial dose is well tolerated.30 |
|
| |||
| CYP2D6 | Paroxetine (Paxil) | Ultrarapid metabolizer: Select alternative because of possible lack of effectiveness. Poor metabolizer: Select alternative or if use is warranted, consider 50% starting dose reduction27 |
CPIC guidance is available for CYP2D6-genotype guided paroxetine therapy.27 |
ACCF/AHA = American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association; CPIC = Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium; CYP = cytochrome P450; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; PharmGKB = Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase.
—The format for reporting pharmacogenetic test results varies by laboratory and institution. Complete information on interpreting test results, including other genotypes associated with each metabolizer phenotype, is available in CPIC guidelines for each gene-drug pair (available at http://www.pharmgkb.org/page/cpic or from the reference laboratory).
—Dosing guidance is supported by CPIC guidelines and FDA prescribing information. If CPIC guidelines are unavailable, the quality of evidence supporting clinically relevant effects of genetic variability as rated by the PharmGKB is provided.
—PharmGKB evidence levels are defined at https://www.pharmgkb.org/page/clinAnnLevels.
CYP2C19 AND CLOPIDOGREL
Clopidogrel is a prodrug that is activated in the liver to exert its antiplatelet effects by a two-step process that largely involves the CYP2C19 enzyme.31 The CYP2C19 gene is highly polymorphic, with many variations occurring naturally. Most patients (up to 80%) have normal CYP2C19 activity based on their genotype, but approximately 18% to 45% and 2% to 15% of patients have intermediate or poor CYP2C19 enzyme activity, respectively.9,31
Clopidogrel-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation varies widely among different patient groups. This variable response has been linked in part to genetic alterations in the CYP2C19 enzyme function.9 A number of studies have documented decreased formation of active clopidogrel metabolites and higher on-treatment platelet aggregation in patients who carry one or two copies of a reduced-function CYP2C19 allele.31–34
Although clopidogrel has numerous uses, CYP2C19 genetic variability has been linked to adverse clinical outcomes primarily in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.9,31,35 Meta-analyses have found that patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes who are poor CYP2C19 metabolizers (carriers of two reduced-function alleles) and taking clopidogrel have a significantly increased risk of a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 2.50; P = .002) or stent thrombosis (hazard ratio = 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.75 to 9.02; P = .001).9,35,36 Conversely, meta-analyses show no clinical benefit for testing patients with lower clinical risks (e.g., clopidogrel use in atrial fibrillation).9,35,37,38 In 2010, the FDA added a boxed warning to the clopidogrel drug label about higher rates of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome who are poor metabolizers of CYP2C19, compared with patients who have normal CYP2C19 function, and recommended that clinicians consider alternative treatments in these patients.”24
Physicians should consider CYP2C19 testing to guide antiplatelet therapy selection in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.9 When evaluating the expected response to clopidogrel, clinicians should keep in mind other factors that may affect clopidogrel response and/or clinical outcomes. These factors include underlying risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, age) and concomitant medications (e.g., omeprazole [Prilosec], a CYP2C19 inhibitor).9,25
Considerations in Ordering and Using Pharmacogenetic Tests
CLINICAL UTILITY AND PRACTICE-BASED RESOURCES
Although a randomized controlled trial is the preferred method for establishing utility of a new drug, there are challenges in designing and executing these trials for pharmacogenetic testing.39–42 Clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing is based largely on observational and retrospective trials conducted in targeted patient populations. Although proponents of pharmacogenetic testing cite challenges in demonstrating the benefit of an intervention that largely benefits patient outliers (e.g., poor metabolizers, nonresponders), the lack of supporting randomized controlled trials remains a limitation in the clinical adoption of these tests.10,40,41,43,44
ORDERING AND REIMBURSEMENT
Although availability varies, CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and other pharmacogenetic tests can be used as stand-alone tests or within broader pharmacogenetic panels. Further information on test availability and ordering is available through the National Institutes of Health Genetic Testing Registry (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/) and the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (https://www.pharmgkb.org/). Because clinical reimbursement rates vary, clinicians should consider contacting the laboratory or the patient’s insurance provider for details before ordering.
Supplementary Material
SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE.
| Clinical recommendation | Evidence rating | References | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codeine should be avoided in CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers because of the potential for toxicity. | C | 13, 23 | Consensus guideline based on observational studies and case reports |
| Codeine, and possibly tramadol, should be avoided in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers because of possible lack of effectiveness. | C | 13, 23 | Consensus guideline based on observational studies |
| In poor CYP2C19 metabolizers who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes, ticagrelor (Brilinta) or prasugrel (Effient) should be considered as an alternative to clopidogrel (Plavix) for antiplatelet therapy. | B | 9, 36, 37 | Consensus guideline based on observational studies; meta-analyses of observational studies show conflicting results |
CYP = cytochrome P450.
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, U01 HG007269.
The authors thank Drs. Caitrin McDonough and Larisa Cavallari for their assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
Biographies
KU-LANG CHANG, MD, is a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine at the University of Florida College of Medicine in Gainesville.
KRISTIN WEITZEL, PharmD, is a clinical associate professor in the Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research at the University of Florida College of Pharmacy.
SIEGFRIED SCHMIDT, MD, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine at the University of Florida College of Medicine.
Footnotes
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms pharmacogenetic, pharmacogenomic, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19. The search included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and guidelines. We also searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse database, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality evidence reports, DynaMed, and UpToDate. Search dates: September 15, 2014, and June 8, 2015.
Contributor Information
KU-LANG CHANG, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
KRISTIN WEITZEL, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida.
SIEGFRIED SCHMIDT, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
References
- 1.Evans WE, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics—drug disposition, drug targets, and side effects. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(6):538–549. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McGuire AL, Burke W. An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. JAMA. 2008;300(22):2669–2671. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Annas GJ, Elias S. 23andMe and the FDA. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(11):985–988. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1316367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Accessed October 16, 2014];Table of pharmacogenomic biomarkers in drug labeling. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/scienceresearch/researchareas/pharmacogenetics/ucm083378.htm.
- 5.Haga SB, et al. Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Genet. 2012;82(4):388–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01908.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johansen Taber KA, Dickinson BD. Pharmacogenomic knowledge gaps and educational resource needs among physicians in selected specialties. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2014;7:145–162. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S63715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.National Institutes of Health. [Accessed May 21, 2015];Genetics home reference. http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/glossary.
- 8.National Human Genome Research Institute. [Accessed October 16, 2014];Talking glossary of genetic terms. http://www.genome.gov/Glossary/
- 9.Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(3):317–323. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Caudle KE, Klein TE, Hoffman JM, et al. Incorporation of pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice: the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline development process. Curr Drug Metab. 2014;15(2):209–217. doi: 10.2174/1389200215666140130124910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, de Boer A, et al. Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte—an update of guidelines. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(5):662–673. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Teutsch SM, et al. The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative. Genet Med. 2009;11(1):3–14. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318184137c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crews KR, Gaedigk A, Dunnenberger HM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype and codeine therapy: 2014 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(4):376–382. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thorn CF, Klein TE, Altman RB. Codeine and morphine pathway. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009;19(7):556–558. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32832e0eac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lötsch J, Rohrbacher M, Schmidt H, Doehring A, Brockmöller J, Geisslinger G. Can extremely low or high morphine formation from codeine be predicted prior to therapy initiation? Pain. 2009;144(1–2):119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koren G, Cairns J, Chitayat D, Gaedigk A, Leeder SJ. Pharmacogenetics of morphine poisoning in a breastfed neonate of a codeine-prescribed mother. Lancet. 2006;368(9536):704. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69255-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Accessed October 16, 2014];FDA drug safety communication: safety review update of codeine use in children: new boxed warning and contraindication on use after tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. 2013 Februrary; http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm339112.htm.
- 18.Gasche Y, Daali Y, Fathi M, et al. Codeine intoxication associated with ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolism [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2005;352(6):638] N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2827–2831. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Accessed June 15, 2015];Codeine product labeling changes. 2013 May; http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/ucm356221.htm.
- 20.Stamer UM, Lehnen K, Höthker F, et al. Impact of CYP2D6 genotype on postoperative tramadol analgesia. Pain. 2003;105(1–2):231–238. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00212-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stamer UM, Musshoff F, Kobilay M, Madea B, Hoeft A, Stuber F. Concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol enantiomers in different CYP2D6 genotypes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;82(1):41–47. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kirchheiner J, Keulen JT, Bauer S, Roots I, Brockmöller J. Effects of the CYP2D6 gene duplication on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tramadol. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28(1):78–83. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318160f827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Madadi P, Amstutz U, Rieder M, et al. CPNDS Clinical Recommendations Group. Clinical practice guideline: CYP2D6 genotyping for safe and efficacious codeine therapy. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013;20(3):e369–e396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Plavix (clopidogrel bisulfate) [package insert] Bridgewater, N.J: Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi; 2013. [Accessed May 21, 2015]. http://products.sanofi.us/PLAVIX/PLAVIX.html. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update) Circulation. 2012;126(7):875–910. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318256f1e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hicks JK, Swen JJ, Thorn CF, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(5):402–408. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hicks JK, Bishop JR, Sangkuhl K, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98(2):127–134. doi: 10.1002/cpt.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Celexa (citalopram hydrobromide) [package insert] St. Louis, Mo: Forest Pharmaceuticals; 2014. [Accessed May 21, 2015]. http://pi.actavis.com/data_stream.asp?product_group=1906&p=pi&language=E. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abilify (aripiprazole) [package insert] Rockville, Md: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; 2014. [Accessed May 21, 2015]. http://www.otsuka-us.com/Documents/Abilify.PI.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Strattera (atomoxetine) [package insert] Indianapolis, Ind: Eli Lilly; 2015. [Accessed May 21, 2015]. http://pi.lilly.com/us/strattera-pi.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Shuldiner AR, et al. PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22(2):159–165. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32834d4962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shuldiner AR, O’Connell JR, Bliden KP, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA. 2009;302(8):849–857. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hulot JS, Bura A, Villard E, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects. Blood. 2006;108(7):2244–2247. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-013052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brandt JT, Close SL, Iturria SJ, et al. Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not prasugrel. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(12):2429–2436. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johnson JA, Roden DM, Lesko LJ, et al. Clopidogrel: a case for indication-specific pharmacogenetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(5):774–776. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI. JAMA. 2010;304(16):1821–1830. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holmes MV, et al. CYP2C19 genotype, clopidogrel metabolism, platelet function, and cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2011;306(24):2704–2714. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paré G, Mehta SR, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of CYP2C19 genotype on outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1704–1714. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Haddow JE, Palomaki GE. ACCE: a model process for evaluating data on emerging genetic tests. In: Khoury M, Little J, Burke W, editors. Human Genome Epidemiology: A Scientific Foundation for Using Genetic Information to Improve Health and Prevent Disease. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. 217–233. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Altman RB. Pharmacogenomics: “noninferiority” is sufficient for initial implementation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(3):348–350. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lam YW. Scientific challenges and implementation barriers to translation of pharmacogenomics into clinical practice. ISRN Pharmacol. 2013;2013:641089. doi: 10.1155/2013/641089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Scott SA. Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics. Genet Med. 2011;13(12):987–995. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318238b38c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moaddeb J, Haga SB. Pharmacogenetic testing: current evidence of clinical utility. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2013;4(4):155–169. doi: 10.1177/2042098613485595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kitzmiller JP, Groen DK, Phelps MA, Sadee W. Pharmacogenomic testing: relevance in medical practice: why drugs work in some patients but not in others. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78(4):243–257. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.78a.10145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
