Skip to main content
Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin logoLink to Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin
. 2015 Nov 30;5(4):471–476. doi: 10.15171/apb.2015.064

Clofarabine Has Apoptotic Effect on T47D Breast Cancer Cell Line via P53R2 Gene Expression

Mohammad Rahmati-Yamchi 1,2,*, Nosratollah Zarghami 2, Hojjatollah Nozad Charoudeh 3, Yasin Ahmadi 1,2, Behzad Baradaran 1, Mohammad Khalaj-Kondori 4, Morteza Milani 5, Abolfazl Akbarzadeh 5, Maghsud Shaker 6, Mohammad Pourhassan-Moghaddam 7
PMCID: PMC4729341  PMID: 26819918

Abstract

Purpose: Clofarabine, a purine nucleoside analogue and inhibitor of Ribonucleotide Reductase (RR), is used for treatment of leukemia. Clofarabine-induced defect in DNA replication, induces p53 and subsequently P53R2 genes as subunit of RR. clofarabine deregulated P53R2 gene expression leading to the elevated levels of P53R2 which impose resistance to DNA damaging drugs. In this study the apoptotic and cytotoxic effects of clofarabine has been investigated on breast cancer cell line.

Methods: Cofarabine cytotoxicity on T47D cells has been studied by MTT assay. T47D cells were exposed to the different concentrations of clofarabine for 24, 48 and 72 hours intervals. Relative expression of P53R2 gene has been studied using real-time PCR. Moreover, after treating with clofarabine the apoptotic and necrotic cells were detected using Annexin V and propodium iodide (PI) reagents by flowcytometry technique.

Results: MTT assay results showed that the clofarabine IC50 on T47D cell line were 3 and 2.5µM after 48 and 72 h exposure, respectively. Clofarabine did not show any significant cytotoxic effect after 24 h exposure. The analysis of qRT-PCR showed a significant increase in P53R2 gene expression in treated cells with both 2.5 and 3 μM doses and also, the results of flowcytometry revealed 26.91 and 74.46 percent apoptosis induction in 48 and 72h treatments respectively in comparison to the control groups.

Conclusion: Our results showed that apoptotic and cytotoxic effects of clofarabine on T47D cell line were in time and dose dependent manner; therefore it could be considered a new candidate in breast cancer therapy.

Keywords: Apoptosis, Breast Cancer, DNA damage, P53R2

Introduction

After surgery, the standard procedure for treatment of breast cancer is chemotherapy. Clofarabin, one of the compounds that are used in chemotherapy, is a purine nucleoside analogue that has a strong inhibitory effect on wide-spread leukemia and some of solid tumors such as ovary, prostate, kidney and breast.1-3 In the unphosphorylated form, clofarabine passes through the cell membrane using several transporting system including diffusion, facilitated diffusion and active transportation, and it is phosphorylates by intracellular kinases to its mono, di and three phosphates forms.1 From these forms, only clolfarabine-3 phosphate is therapeutically active, and the remaining forms act as intracellular clofarabine reservoir.2-4

Clofarabine-3P plays its roles through different mechanisms including: a) it competes with dATP during DNA replication and repair. b) it binds to allostric site of regulatory subunits of Ribonucleotide Reductase (RR) enzyme and inhibts dCTP, dATP formation. Reducing the dCTP level limits DNA synthesis and reactivates deoxyCytidinekinase (dCK) and subsequently increases formation of clofarabine-3P. Also, high clofarabin -3P/dATP concentration ratio results in priority of clofarabine-3P to dATP in competition for DNA-polymerase. c) It induces apoptosis through inhibition of DNA repair.2-5

P53R2, a p53-induced peptide, is a homologue of R2 subunit, which can substitute with R2 subunit in RR structure. RR is a tetramer composed of two different homodimers including hRRM1 (R1) and hRRM2 (R2).6,7 P53, R1 and R2 are expressed in a cell cycle dependent manner. R1 and R2 expressed completely during the S-phase.8,9 R2 gene is regulated by cell cycle-associated transcription factors, such as NF-Y and E2F;10 however, P53R2 is regulated by p53 in response to genotoxic stresses such as irradiation.11 After DNA damage, p53 not only causes to cell-cycle arrest in the G1 and G2 phases, but also induces P53R2 gene expression. Subsequently, P53R2 accumulates in cell nuclear and increases RR activity.12,13 However, P53R2 activation may not be fast enough to provide dNTPs immidiatly, which can be completed during a few hours after DNA damage. It is shown that ATM phosphorylates P53R2 in response to genotoxic stress. This modification is essential for maintaining P53R2 protein stability against degradation by ubiquitylation.14

Because of the long half-life, R1 level is constant higher than R2 level throughout cell cycle.6,15 In early G1-phase, R2, but not P53R2, is degraded by cadherin 1/anaphase promoting complex (Cdh1/APC).12 Thus, in G1phase, P53R2 acts with R1 instead of R2 to provide dNTPs for DNA.15-17 So there are two independent pathways in providing dNTPs: first, R2 provides dNTPs in S-phase and second, P53R2 provides dNTPs for DNA repair in G1 or G2-phase.12

The maximum level of P53R2 has been found at G1/S transition.6 Furthermore, P53R2 up-regulates P21 and down-regulates cyclin D,15 causing cell cycle arrest in G1 and providing both time and dNTP for the repair of damaged DNA.

Also, P53R2 plays an important role in mitochondrial veracity. Based on previous studies, mutations in P53R2 are associated with severe depletion of mitochondrial DNA in both human and mouse cell lines.18,19 Moreover, P53R2 may plays a role in scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and thereby protecting mitochondrial membrane from oxidative stress.12 In addition, P53R2 down-regulates MEK-ERK signal pathway through direct interaction with ERK-Kinase2.20 MEK-ERK signaling pathway regulates various cellular processes including cell cycle progression and cell survival, thus inhibition of this pathway is another anti-cancer property of P53R2.21,22

Since the P53R2 is critical molecule in dNTP formation and DNA repair, we hypothesizes that clofarabine might plays a role in apoptosis and cancer therapy by altering the expression levels of P53R2 gene. To evaluate this hypothesis, T47D breast cancer cell line was treated with several concentrations of clofarabine in different times. The MTT assay, flowcytometry, and qRT-PCR were used for evaluation of cytotoxicity, apoptosis and gene expression, respectively.

Materials and Methods

Human epithelial breast cancer cell line (T47D) was purchased from Pasteur Institute (Iran), RPMI1640 powdered cell culture medium was purchased from Gibco (England), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), Penicillin/ streptomycin 100X, Trypsin-EDTA 10X and Trypan-blue were acquired from Biosera (England); MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimetylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide were obtained from Sigma (USA), PI was from CALBIOCHEM (Germany), cDNA synthesis kit and Real Time-PCR master mix were provided from Thermo Scientific (USA), RNX-Plus was purchased from Sinaclon (Iran). Clofarabine was obtained from Sigma (USA).

Cell culture

T47D cells were propagated in RPMI1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2mM of glutamine, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 g/ml), at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Then, cells were seeded into plates for MTT assay and into flasks (25 cm2) for gene expression and apoptosis studies, respectively.

Cytotoxicity assay

Before doing MTT assay, the count and viability of cultured cells were determined u8sing a hemocytometer. Then, for MTT assay, the cells were seeded at 5×103 cells per well in 96-well culture plates and were settled at 37°C for 24 h, followed by treatment with different concentrations of clofarabine (1.5 - 8μM). The concentration of clofarabine that inhibited cell proliferation by 50% (IC50s) was determined from MTT assay data after 24, 48 and 72h treatments. Each experiment was done in triplicate manner.

P53R2 gene expression

The cells were seeded in 7 flasks with concentration of 1×106 cells/flask. Then 3 flasks were treated with IC50 of 48h exposure time for 24, 48 and 72h exposure, and other three flasks were treated with IC50 of 72h exposure time for 24, 48 and 72h exposure times; and last flask was served as control group. Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using RNX Plus kit and 1μg of total RNA was used as substrate for reverse transcription using Thermo Scientific cDNA synthesis kit according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Quantification of genes expression was performed with master mix from Thermo scientific company using thermo-cycler Corbet 2000 real-time PCR mashine. PCR primers were 5'-AGG CTC GCT TCT ATG GC-3' (forward) and5'-TCT GCT ATC CAT CGC AAG GC-3' (reverse) for P53R2. Gene expression levels in each cDNA sample were normalized to the internal β-actin gene expression level (Forward primer: 5´ACCGTGAAAAGATGACCCAG3´ and Reverse primer: 5´CCATACCCAAGAAGGAAGGC3´). The experiments were done in triplicate manner for each sample.

Apoptosis assay

T74D cells were seeded at concentration of 1×106 cells/ flask. One of these flasks was used as control and other two flasks were used for 48 and 72h treatment with clofarabine. The 24 h time exposure was not included in the experiments, because after treatments the 24 h exposure did not show significant cytotoxic effects on T47D cell line. After treatments, apoptosis detection kit (CALBIOCHEM, Germany) was used for apoptosis evaluation according to the manufacturers protocol.

Statistical analysis

The alteration of P53R2 gene expression was analyzed by ∆∆Ct method and version 16 of SPSS (with p<0.05) was used for statistical analyses. The results of apoptosis experiment were analyzed by Flowjo software.

Results

Clofarabine has cytotoxicity effect on T47D cell line

Clofarabine induces DNA damage and therefore it can impose cytotoxicity effect on T47D cells. After treatment of T47D cell line with different concentrations of clofarabine for 24, 48 and 72h, clofarabine IC50 was calculated as 3µM for 48h treatment and 2.5µM for 72h treatment. In this study, after 24h treatment, clofarabine did not show cytotoxic effect on T47D cell line (Figures 1 and 2). These results show that clofarabine at the longer treatment duration has a stronger cytotoxic effect on T47D cell line.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The results of MTT assay after 48h treatment with different concentrations of clofarabine. 3µM clofarabine is cytotoxic to half of cellular population (IC50 of 48h).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The results of MTT assay after 72h treatment with different concentrations of clofarabine. 2.5µM clofarabine induces cell death in half of cellular population (IC50 of 72h).

Clofarabine induces P53R2 gene expression

Clofarabine inhibits RR complex that results in gradual reduction of dNTPs pool. Low level of dNTPs inhibits or defects repair of damaged DNA which induces p53 and p53R2 proteins,subsequently. Upon binding of P53R2 to R1, they form an active RR complex that provides dNTPs for repair of DNA.

P53R2 expression after 24, 48 and 72h treatments with two clofarabine concentrations equal to acquired IC50s (2.5 and 3µM) has shown in Table 1 and Figure 3. Based on the results, the higher concentration of clofarabine and longer treatment duration induce p53R2 gene expression more efficiently, but it seems that the effect of treatment duration is more significant than the effect of concentration (Figure 3). In other words, in longer treatment duration, the P53R2 gene expression was increased regularly.

Table 1. The effect of clofarabine on P53R2 gene expression in T47D cell line .

samples clofarabine concentration (µM) P53R2 gene expression
(fold change)
control 0 1
24h 3 µM 3.83
2.5µM 8.39
48h 3 µM 28.24
2.5µM 18.76
72h 3 µM 76.10
2.5µM 61.39

The level of P53R2 gene expression after treatment with different clofarabine concentrations (3 µM and 2.5µM), shows that clofarabine induces P53R2 gene expression and it's level is directly related to treatment duration so that in treatment of 24h the gene expression is after the lowest level and after treatment of 72h is in the highest level .

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The clofarabine effect on P53R2 gene expression. As this figure shows, in higher clofarabine concentrations and treatment durations, the expression of P53R2 increases. P53R2 expression is more dependent on treatment duration than clofarabine concentration (C1=3μM amd C2=2.5μM). *: increasing in P53R2 gene expression is significant in comparison to the control group.

Clofarabine induces apoptosis in T47D cell line

As mentioned earlier, clofarabine causes DNA damage by RR complex inhibition. And it can induce P53 gene expression that induces.

As shown in Table 2, after 48 and 72h treatments, clofarabine induced apoptosis in T47D cell line about 26.91% and 74.46%, respectively. These results show that treatment in longer duration is more effective for induction of apoptosis. The flowcytometry results for control, 48 and 72h treatments are shown in Figures 4-6.

Table 2. The apoptotic effect of clofarabine on T47D cell line .

Cell situation (%) Live cells (LL) Apoptotic cells (LR) Late apoptotic and necrotic cells (UR) Necrotic cells (UL)
Control 97.24 0.09 0.68 1.99
After 48h treatment 63.52 7.73 19.18 9.57
After 72h treatment 21.15 7.59 66.87* 4.45

The results of flowcytometry (the percentage of live cell, early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells) after treatment of T47D cell line with 3μM clofarabine. The number of dead cells in the treated samples after 48 and 72h is remarkably more than the control sample. On the other hand, the number of apoptotic cells after 72h treatment is more than 48h treatment which suggests that clofarabine induces more apoptosis in longer duration treatment time. *: apoptosis induction in the treated cells is significant in comparison to the control group.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The flowcytometry result for the control sample. It shows there is an acceptable amount of alive cells in the control sample (%97.24), on the other hand the number of necrotic and apoptotic cell are not remarkable.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The flowcytometry result for 72h treatment with 3μM of clofarabine. The number of dead cells has increased significantly in comparison with control and treatment of 48h samples.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The flowcytometry result after 48h treatment with 3μM of clofarabine. After treatment there is a significant cell death.

Discussion

Clofarabine is a therapeutic agent in treatment of leukemias, also, has a good inhibitory effect up on several solid tumors such as ovary and colon cancers.23,24 The results of the present study show that clofarabine inhibits T47D cell growth. It means that clofarabine might have anti-cancer effects on breast cancer. It has been shown that clofarabine had anti-cancer effect by induction of p53 and P21 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line.25 Considering the results of the present study, in T47D breast cancer cell line, clofarabine induces DNA damage and P53R2 gene expression. Therefore, clofarabine could plays cytotoxic effect by induction of DNA damage and gene expression on T47D cells line.

Based on the results of flowcytometry, clofarabine can induces apoptosis in T47D cell line through induction of DNA damage and subsequent activation of internal apoptosis pathway.‏ Deregulated expression of P53R2 has been shown in various cancer types.20 P53R2 repairs DNA and acts as scavenger of ROS, maintaining cell survival of both cancerous and non-cancerous cells. Also, other studies showed apposite effects and in some cancers elevated P53R2 level can causes cancer progression through exerting resistance to DNA damaging therapies such as clofarabine and radiotherapy. Therefore, it is possible that clofarabine-induced P53R2 gene expression, attenuates cytotoxic effect of clofarabine on T47D cell and other solid cancer, and interesting neglable cytotoxic effect of clofarabine on T47D cells during 24 h exposure confirms anti-apoptotic behavior of P53R2 protein in breast cancer.

Conclusion

Clofarabine possess cytotoxic effect on T47D cell line and induces its apoptosis. On the other hand, it acts as an inducer for P53R2 gene expression. Some studies have reported that P53R2 can improve cancer cell response to therapy. Regarding to anti-growth effect of clofarabine on T47D cell line as in vitro model of breast cancer, further studies are required to study anti-cancer efficacy of clofarabine on breast cancer animal models, before using it in the clinical trial studies.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Immunology Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Ethical Issues

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Jeha S, Gaynon PS, Razzouk BI, Franklin J, Kadota R, Shen V. et al. Phase II study of clofarabine in pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1917–23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.8554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhenchuk A, Lotfi K, Juliusson G, Albertioni F. Mechanisms of anti-cancer action and pharmacology of clofarabine. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78(11):1351–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.06.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nagai S, Takenaka K, Nachagari D, Rose C, Domoney K, Sun D. et al. Deoxycytidine kinase modulates the impact of the ABC transporter ABCG2 on clofarabine cytotoxicity. Cancer Res. 2011;71(5):1781–91. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pui CH, Jeha S. Clofarabine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;Suppl:S12–3. doi: 10.1038/nrd1724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Faderl S, Gandhi V, Keating MJ, Jeha S, Plunkett W, Kantarjian HM. The role of clofarabine in hematologic and solid malignancies--development of a next-generation nucleoside analog. Cancer. 2005;103(10):1985–95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang X, Zhenchuk A, Wiman KG‏. Regulation of p53R2 and its role as potential target for cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2009;276(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yanamoto S, Kawasaki G, Yoshitomi I, Mizuno A. Expression of p53R2, newly p53 target in oral normal epithelium, epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2003;190(2):233–43. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00588-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nakamura Y. Isolation of p53-target genes and their functional analysis. Cancer Sci. 2004;95(1):7–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03163.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou B, Liu X, Mo X, Xue L, Darwish D, Qiu W. et al. The human ribonucleotide reductase subunit hRRM2 complements p53R2 in response to UV-induced DNA repair in cells with mutant p53. Cancer Res. 2003;63(20):6583–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hakansson P, Hofer A, Thelander L. Regulation of mammalian ribonucleotide reduction and dNTP pools after DNA damage and in resting cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(12):7834–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512894200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakano K, Bálint E, Ashcroft M, Vousden KH. ‏ A ribonucleotide reductase gene is a transcriptional target of p53 and p73. Oncogene. 2000;19(37):4283–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xue L, Zhou B, Liu X, Heung Y, Chau J, Chu E. et al. Ribonucleotide reductase small subunit p53R2 facilitates p21 induction of G1 arrest under UV irradiation. Cancer Res. 2007;67(1):16–21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamaguchi T, Matsuda K, Sagiya Y, Iwadate M, Fujino MA, Nakamura Y. et al. p53R2-dependent pathway for DNA synthesis in a p53-regulated cell cycle checkpoint. Cancer Res. 2001;61(22):8256–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chang L, Zhou B, Hu S, Guo R, Liu X, Jones SN. et al. ATM-mediated serine 72 phosphorylation stabilizes ribonucleotide reductase small subunit p53R2 protein against MDM2 to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18519–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803313105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang K, Wu J, Wu X, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou N. et al. P53R2 inhibits the proliferation of human cancer cells in association with cell-cycle arrest. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(2):269–78. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pontarin G, Ferraro P, Bee L, Reichard P, Bianchi V. Mammalian ribonucleotide reductase subunit p53R2 is required for mitochondrial DNA replication and DNA repair in quiescent cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(33):13302–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211289109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morikawa T, Maeda D, Kume H, Homma Y, Fukayama M. Ribonucleotide reductase M2 subunit is a novel diagnostic marker and a potential therapeutic target in bladder cancer. Histopathology. 2010;57(6):885–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03725.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang X, Liu X, Xue L, Zhang K, Kuo ML, Hu S. et al. Ribonucleotide reductase subunit p53R2 regulates mitochondria homeostasis and function in KB and PC-3 cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;410(1):102–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thelander L. Ribonucleotide reductase and mitochondrial DNA synthesis. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):703–4. doi: 10.1038/ng0607-703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Piao C, Jin M, Kim HB, Lee SM, Amatya PN, Hyun JW. et al. Ribonucleotide reductase small subunit p53R2 suppresses MEK-ERK activity by binding to ERK kinase 2. Oncogene. 2009;28(21):2173–84. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Wong EW, Chang F. et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773(8):1263–84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peyssonnaux C, Eychene A. The Raf/MEK/ERK pathway: New concepts of activation. Biol Cell. 2001;93(1-2):53–62. doi: 10.1016/s0248-4900(01)01125-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bonate PL, Arthaud L, Cantrell WR Jr, Stephenson K, Secrist JA 3rd, Weitman S. Discovery and development of clofarabine: A nucleoside analogue for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(10):855–63. doi: 10.1038/nrd2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kantarjian HM, Gandhi V, Kozuch P, Faderl S, Giles F, Cortes J. et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of clofarabine in patients with solid and hematologic cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1167–73. doi: 10.1200/jco.2003.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lubecka-Pietruszewska K, Kaufman-Szymczyk A, Stefanska B, Cebula-Obrzut B, Smolewski P, Fabianowska-Majewska K. Clofarabine, a novel adenosine analogue, reactivates DNA methylation-silenced tumour suppressor genes and inhibits cell growth in breast cancer cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;723:276–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES