Abstract
Until recently, malaria vaccine development efforts have focused almost exclusively on a handful of well characterized Plasmodium falciparum antigens. Despite dedicated work by many researchers on different continents spanning more than half a century, a successful malaria vaccine remains elusive. Sequencing of the P. falciparum genome has revealed more than five thousand genes, providing the foundation for systematic approaches to discover candidate vaccine antigens. We are taking advantage of this wealth of information to discover new antigens that may be more effective vaccine targets. Herein, we describe different approaches to large-scale screening of the P. falciparum genome to identify targets of either antibody responses or T cell responses using human specimens collected in Controlled Human Malaria Infections (CHMI) or under conditions of natural exposure in the field. These genome, proteome and transcriptome based approaches offer enormous potential for the development of an efficacious malaria vaccine.
Keywords: Antigen discovery, large-scale screen, immunomics, reverse vaccinology, protein microarrays, T cell antigens
1. Introduction
The Plasmodium falciparum genome project began in 1997 with optimism that it would lead to a better understanding of the parasite, better disease treatments, and an effective malaria vaccine. The first complete annotated genome sequence was published five years later in 2002 [1], followed by the proteome [2,3] and transcriptome [4,5]. These datasets have become important tools advancing the field of malaria research with specific application for the development of vaccines, drugs and diagnostics.
Prior to the genome sequencing era, only a few dozen Plasmodium proteins had been identified. Therefore malaria vaccine development had been largely empirical, evaluating different platforms and formulations that might improve protective efficacy of the few known antigens. Those efforts were largely unsuccessful [6]. The advent of the “genomic era” following the sequencing of the genome of Haemophilus influenza in 1995 [7] and associated technological advances has resulted in the availability of large-scale datasets of genomic, proteomic and transcriptomic information which have enabled a switch in focus from vaccine platforms to vaccine antigens. Conceptual changes driven by more refined consideration of the specific target profile have also occurred (http://www.who.int/immunization/topics/malaria/vaccine_roadmap/en/). Because the parasite has several developmental stages with a dynamically changing transcriptome and proteome, each discovery effort must be tailored to the purpose of a specific vaccine. For example, a vaccine might seek to induce antibodies against the surface proteins of infected erythrocytes, or antibodies against the invasion proteins of blood stage merozoites, or T cell responses against proteins expressed by intrahepatic parasites. Likewise, there has been increasing recognition that an effective vaccine will probably need to be multivalent, directed against multiple antigens which may be expressed in different stages of the parasite life cycle.
One of the biggest hurdles in the development of an effective vaccine against complex microorganisms that encode thousands of proteins, such as the Plasmodium spp. parasite, is the identification of the subset of key antigens that can be induce a protective immune response. Advances in high throughput sequencing during the last decade have made possible “reverse vaccinology” [8], which takes advantage of genome sequence data, and applies bioinformatics to predict immunogenic vaccine antigen candidates. Annotated proteomic features associated with antigenicity and vaccine efficacy, such as extracellular location, outer membrane proteins, signal peptides, and B- and T-cell epitopes can be computationally predicted based on the amino acid sequence with a consequent reduction in the number of candidate antigens. However, although such antigen prediction can lower the priority of some potential candidates, it tends to produce large lists that require additional labor intensive and time consuming laboratory investigations to further narrow down the vaccine candidates. Bioinformatic approaches may also fail to identify bone fide antigens that would otherwise appear promising using empirical methods. Additional efficient, high throughput screening approaches are needed that can be accomplished on a whole genome scale to provide more empirical data to inform antigen selection.
A refinement of reverse vaccinology is the discipline of immunomics which integrates genomics and immunology by using biological samples from humans or animals with immunity to the target pathogen to identify the subset of pathogen-derived proteins or their epitopes that are recognized by the host immune system [9,10]. A critical component of these proteome-wide immune screening assays is the use of clinically relevant selection criteria, such as induction of antibodies of a specific subclass or T cell responses characterized by Th1 (or Th2) cytokines.
2. Human models establishing the feasibility of a malaria vaccine
A highly effective malaria vaccine would be a valuable tool to reduce the disease burden and is considered a critical component of global eradication [11]. Optimism that an efficacious malaria vaccine can be developed derives from two independent lines of research. In the first instance, individuals living in areas where P. falciparum is endemic and are repeatedly exposed to the parasite throughout childhood and adolescence develop naturally acquired immunity (NAI)1 which decreases the incidence and severity of clinical malaria episodes and prevalence and density of blood stage parasitemia but does not prevent infection [12,13]. Moreover, passive transfer of immunoglobulin from individuals with NAI can decrease peripheral parasitemia and resolve clinical symptoms in the recipient [14,15]. This suggests that antibody responses against antigens expressed in the blood-stage of the parasite life cycle are important targets of NAI. Thus, profiling the antibody responses associated with NAI and comparing to the profiles of age-matched susceptible cases could inform vaccine antigen discovery.
The second line of evidence comes from studies showing that immunization with Plasmodium sporozoites that are attenuated by radiation such that they can invade the hepatocyte but cannot develop beyond late liver stages (Radiation-Attenuated Sporozoites, RAS) can induce sterilizing immunity against challenge with infectious sporozoites in mice and humans [16-19]. Studies in murine models indicate that T cell responses (especially CD8+ T cells) directed against antigens expressed in the liver stage of the parasite life cycle are the critical mediators of this sporozoite-induced immunity [19-22].
An alternative sporozoite vaccine modality to that described above is experimental immunization by mosquito bite with sporozoites from Plasmodium infected mosquitoes with concurrent chloroquine administration (ChemoProphylaxis and Sporozoites, CPS-immunization; also known as infection–treatment–vaccination, ITV) [23-25]. The RAS and CPS immunization regimens are thought to induce a broad repertoire of T cell specificities, recognizing multiple antigens expressed by the Plasmodium spp. parasite during hepatic development [26]. There is evidence that the breadth of response is evolving during the course of immunization [27]. A better understanding of the breadth of the cellular immune response against Plasmodium is therefore central to the development of an effective prophylactic vaccine against malaria.
3. Full- and partial-proteome immune-profiling of Plasmodium infections in humans
The human vaccine models described above present a unique opportunity to characterize the molecular determinants underpinning the strong immunity they induce. In the case of RAS or CPS regimens, for example, the measure of anamnestic (or recall) responses of T cells from immunized subjects against a panel of P. falciparum antigens and their correlation to clinical outcome is possible. For these kinds of differential screenings, the ideal situation is presented when the rate of sterilizing immunity to CHMI is less than 100% (a common outcome), so that decoy responses, immunodominant and /or pre-existing responses can be identified and discounted from future consideration. The main challenges in performing these types of full proteome screens for Plasmodium spp. derive from the size and complexity of their genomes. The genome of P. falciparum contains about 5,300 genes [1]. Many proteins are encoded by complex multi-exons genes sometimes several kilobases in length and contain long stretches of repetitive sequences, a consequence of the organism's low GC content. Consequently, cloning and expression of antigenic targets from Plasmodium spp. parasites is particularly difficult and efforts to express Plasmodium proteins on a large scale using conventional expression systems have been largely unsuccessful [28-31]. Even at the individual level, expression of full-length proteins has been challenging. For instance, the leading RTS,S vaccine comprises only a fragment of CSP and successful expression of the entire protein in amounts compatible with the development of a full-length CSP vaccine has only recently been achieved in a combinatorial Pseudomonas fluorescens expression system [32]. Despite these limitations, expression libraries containing a significant fraction of the P. falciparum proteome have been successfully built and screened for the identification of antibody responses [33-35] (see below).
4. Antibody-based proteomic studies to antigen discovery
To inform antibody-based antigen discovery, we and others have been developing proteome-wide approaches that are cost-effective, rapid, and independent of predictive algorithms, with the aim of reducing the laboratory time and cost associated with vaccine and serodiagnostic antigen discovery. In particular, a rapid high throughput approach to efficiently clone and express each individual gene in the entire microorganism's genome using an E. coli cell-free transcription/translation expression system was developed at Antigen Discovery, Inc. and the University of California at Irvine [36,37]. The proteome is interrogated with sera from infected and vaccinated individuals to identify immunoreactive vaccine antigen candidates associated with protection. Similarly, antibody response profiles in disease cases and healthy controls can be compared to identify antigens with the most accurate predictive diagnostic value.
This protein microarray platform was originally developed using vaccinia virus (~220 genes) as the model pathogen [36]. Since then the National Institutes for Health (NIH), the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAD) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) have provided support for antigen discovery against more than 30 human pathogens including M. tuberculosis [38], P. falciparum [33,34,39], P. vivax, B. melitensis [40], C. trachomatis [41], F. tularensis[42,43], B. pseudomallei [44,45], C. burnetii[46-48], B. burgdorferi [49], Salmonella enterica typhi, R. prowazekii, R. rickettsii, O. tsutsugamushi, B. henselae [37], L. interrogans, T. gondii [50], C. albicans [51], Schistosoma mansoni [52], Schistosoma japonicum [52], and viruses including vaccinia [36,53-55], monkeypox, Herpes 1 & 2, Varicella zoster, HPV [56], HIV, Dengue, influenza, West Nile and Chikungunya. In total, we have cloned more than 60,000 genes from infectious microorganisms, printed the encoded proteins on 25,000 microarrays and probed the arrays with 12,000 serum specimens determining disease associated antibody profiles in people infected with each agent. The individual proteins printed on these arrays capture antibodies present in serum from infected individuals and the amount of captured antibody can be quantified using fluorescent secondary antibodies. In this way, a comprehensive profile of antibodies that result after infection or exposure can be determined that is characteristic of the type of infection and the stage of disease [49,54,55].
This unbiased systems biology approach offers a powerful means of identifying vaccine antigens, surrogate biomarkers associated with protection, and serodiagnostic antigens of pathogen exposure. Arrays can be produced and probed in large numbers (>100 serum specimens/day) while consuming small quantities of individual sera (~2 μl of sera/patient). This permits assessing the repertoire of antibodies created in response to infection or vaccination from large collections of individual patient sera, and can be used to perform large-scale sero-epidemiological, longitudinal and sero-surveillance analyses not possible with other technologies. Immunoglobulin isotypes and IgG subtypes can be independently determined. Moreover, microarrays offer the potential to express all proteins of an infectious agent and may allow for identification of novel antigens, otherwise undetectable by methods like 2-D gels that are highly biased by microbial protein expression patterns.
When we began investigating this approach more than 10 years ago, there was a lack of empirical data to answer basic questions about differences in breadth, intensity, kinetics, and longevity of immune responses induced by antigens derived from different infectious agents. Questions such as: what percentage of the entire microorganism proteome is recognized by the immune system? Are there differences in antibody reactivity profiles between individuals? Do different host species exposed to the same agent differ in reactivity profiles? Can antibody profiles predict disease stage? Are there characteristic antibody profiles that distinguish gram negative and gram positive bacteria, from responses induced by eukaryotic parasites? Can antigenicity be predicted based on the amino acid sequence alone? Today some generalizations about antigen recognition can be made, supported by rapidly expanding empirical data sets.
4.1. Protein microarray studies of naturally acquired immunity
Several published malaria proteome microarray studies have been aimed at understanding the phenomenon of NAI to malaria. A seminal paper by Crompton et al. [34] showed that naturally exposed individuals from Mali produce antibodies against hundreds of P. falciparum antigens. Both children and adults have more reactivity after the high transmission season, and adults have more reactivity than children. When adolescent children who survived the malaria season without experiencing symptoms were compared with age-matched children who had a malaria episode, 49 antigens were identified that were associated with protection from clinical malaria [34]. Interestingly, Ab reactivity against several conventional lead vaccine candidates (CSP, LSA-3, MSP-1, MSP-2, and AMA-1) did not discriminate between protected and susceptible children. Similar observations from a low-transmission setting of the Peruvian Amazon showed a limited set of P. falciparum protein antigens associated with the development of naturally acquired clinical immunity [57]. Overall this approach is leading the discovery of many novel candidate vaccine antigens.
The high throughput nature of the microarray platform (requiring ~2 μl of serum) lends itself to sero-epidemiological surveys. One conclusion from worldwide epidemiological studies using protein microarray serology is that the breadth and intensity of the antibody response is proportional to the level of parasite exposure in the environment. For example, Baum et al. compared protein microarray seroreactivity from individuals living in Kenya at different elevations [58]. In lowland areas exposure to parasite infected mosquitoes is much more intense than in the highlands, and the breadth and intensity of the antibody response is also elevated in the lowland population. Similar relationships between parasite exposure and the serological response have been observed across Africa, Papua New Guinea and Peru (unpublished). In a different study in Kenya, the influence of HIV infection on immunity to malaria was investigated, since HIV-malaria co-infections are common in many areas but are poorly understood at the immunoproteomic level. In that study, individuals from areas of high and low endemicity had different antibody profiles, as seen elsewhere, but surprisingly HIV infected patients with normal CD4+ counts had the same reactivity against malaria antigens as HIV negative individuals leading to the conclusion that early stage HIV infected patients are not at risk of losing NAI [59]. Individuals with advanced AIDS were not examined in that study.
P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1), which mediates parasite sequestration and host immune evasion, is considered an important antigen in the context of NAI [60,61]. In the first protein microarray based study of variant antigens in malaria, an array was produced containing 123 var domains derived from P. falciparum field isolates from Papua New Guinea [60]. The data showed that the anti-PfEMP1-DBLα antibody responses increase in diversity, magnitude, and prevalence with age. In another study, reactivity to 21 PfEMP1 fragments on a protein microarray was measured in serum samples from Malian children aged 1-6 years and adults [61]. Seroreactivity to PfEMP1 fragments was higher in adults than in children. In a different study, differential recognition of terminal extracellular P. falciparum VAR2CSA domains were determined by printing a protein microarray which included five overlapping fragments of the 3D7 VAR2CSA extracellular region and probing this with sera from multigravid, malaria-exposed Malian women (manuscript in press). Women with a history of at least one pregnancy had antibody responses against four of these fragments and had stronger reactivity against the two distal fragments than did nulliparous women, children, and men from Mali, suggesting that the C-terminal extracellular VAR2CSA domains are a potential focus of protective immunity.
Protein microarrays have also been applied to study the effect of sickle-cell trait on the P. falciparum specific antibody response in a cohort of naturally exposed individuals from Mali [62]. Heterozygous states of hemoglobin (Hb) A and HbS (HbAS, sickle-cell trait) or HbC (HbAC) protect against P. falciparum malaria but the mode of protection is unclear. One hypothesis is that HbAS and HbAC accelerate the acquisition of immunity to malaria, possibly by enhancing Pf-specific antibody responses. However, in this study, protein microarray data showed there were no significant differences in antibody profiles between individuals with normal or sickle cell traits [62].
The array technology has been also applied to compare antibody profiles between the Fulani and Dogon ethnic groups in Mali, which differ in prevalence of symptomatic clinical malaria (manuscript in submission). Elevated IgG and IgM antibody levels were reported in the genetically resistant Fulani people, compared to the more susceptible sympatric Dogon population.
The collective message from all these studies is that naturally acquired immunity is associated with elevated antibodies against hundreds of blood stage antigens. A vaccine that boosts antibody responses against a collection of these blood stage antigens may allow children to reach protection from symptomatic malaria at an earlier age. The waning immune response in adults residing in areas undergoing elimination could be boosted with a vaccine of this kind.
4.2. Protein microarray studies of sporozoite induced immunity
In our initial studies with the protein microarray platform, we reported results from a clinical trial of experimental immunization with radiation attenuated sporozoites in which some of the volunteers were protected from an experimental challenge and others were not [33,35]. Microarrays containing 2,320 P. falciparum proteins were used to determine the profile of antibody responses in volunteers immunized with sporozoites administered by the bites of irradiated mosquitoes. Immunized volunteers reacted against a collection of P. falciparum proteins more strongly than mock infected or naïve individuals. After being challenged with viable sporozoites from infected mosquitoes (Controlled Human Malaria Infection, CHMI), the antibody profile in the protected subjects did not significantly change, indicating that immunization produced a sterilizing infection-blocking immune response (supported by PCR evidence) that blocked maturation of the organism at an early stage post-challenge, and no new antigens were presented to the immune systems as a result of the challenge. In contrast, in unprotected subjects antibody titers increased against dozens of additional proteins after challenge, indicating that new blood stage antigens were presented to the immune system as blood stage parasitemia progressed during the course of clinical malaria. To determine whether antibody responses at the time of challenge could differentiate between protected and unprotected volunteers, the corresponding protein microarrays profiles were compared. A panel of 19 pre-erythrocytic stage antigens was identified as strongly associated with sporozoite-induced protective immunity; 16 of these antigens were novel and have been independently identified in sporozoite and/or liver stage proteomic or transcriptomic datasets [35]. Reactivity to any single antigen did not correlate with protection but there was a highly significant difference in the cumulative signal intensity of multiple antigens between protected and not protected individuals [35]. These data provide the first evidence that sterile protective immunity against malaria is directed against a panel of protective P. falciparum antigens rather than a single dominant antigen. These results also have important implications for vaccine development, suggesting that an efficacious malaria vaccine should be multivalent and targeted at a select panel of key antigens, many of which have not been previously characterized.
This vaccination modality which uses the bites of irradiated P. falciparum -infected mosquitoes to administer the irradiated sporozoites is not a practical pharmaceutical product. Taking on this translational research challenge, Sanaria, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD) has developed the capacity to produce vialed aseptic, purified, and cryopreserved radiation-attenuated and non-attenuated P. falciparum sporozoites in a highly regulated, cGMP compliant, industrial setting [63]. Several CHMI clinical trials have been conducted which show the vaccine to be safe and capable of inducing protective immunity after intravenous administration [64-68]. Protein microarray analysis of some of these specimens is in progress.
Analysis of specimens collected from individuals experimentally immunized by CPS-immunization (ChemoProphylaxis and Sporozoites) has also been conducted. In those studies, a down-selected proteome array containing 809 of the reactive antigens recognized in other cohorts [33-35] has been probed with plasma specimens from CPS-immunized individuals and the responses compared with that of specimens from adult individuals from Kenya with NAI. CPS and NAI both induce potent antibody responses against a large number of P. falciparum antigens, but while many antigens overlap in the two profiles, other antigens are distinctly different [69]. Thus, NAI induces antibodies against hundreds of antigens derived from blood stage parasites, but since chloroquine prevents replication of blood stage parasites there are many antigens recognized in the NAI profile that are not recognized by CPS immunized individuals. Conversely, CPS immunized subjects have antibodies against hundreds of antigens that are lacking in individuals with NAI, and are postulated to represent antigens associated with pre-erythrocytic stages of infection [69].
4.3. Protein microarray studies of pre-erythrocytic vaccine induced immunity
The leading malaria vaccine candidate is the GlaxoSmithKline vaccine RTS,S/AS01, a hybrid virus-like particle formulation of recombinant partial-length circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen expressed in Saccharomyces cerivisiae, adjuvanted in liposomes with MPL® and QS21 immunostimulants) [70]. This vaccine protected ~50% of volunteers against experimental challenge 2 weeks after the last immunization, and 22% of volunteers when challenged at 6 months [71]. Recently, results of the Phase 3 study of RTS,S in sub-Saharan Africa have been reported, with a demonstrated reduction in clinical malaria in the target age group of infants aged 6-12 weeks at first vaccination of only 18% following the 3-dose primary schedule or 26% following a booster dose with RTS,S at 18 months; efficacy in children aged 5-17 months was slightly higher (28% and 36%, respectively) [72]. Protein microarray analysis of specimens from this field trial showed that the breadth and magnitude of the antibody response to both liver and asexual blood stage antigens was significantly lower in RTS,S vaccinees than in controls [73,74] consistent with a partial effect associated with reduction of blood stage parasitemia in the vaccinated population [72].
5. T cell-based proteomic studies to antigen discovery
Methods for the identification of T cells antigens have been reviewed in detail recently [75]. In the case of malaria, two main approaches have been explored to identify P. falciparum antigenic targets of T cell responses induced by experimental immunization or natural exposure to malaria.
5.1. Epitope-based prediction algorithms
One approach to identifying targets of T cell responses has been the use of computerized algorithms that predict putative CD8+ or CD4+ T cell epitopes from proteins translated from genomic sequence [76,77]. A key component of this approach is the identification of HLA supertypes that account for the majority of HLA polymorphisms such that a limited number of HLA supertypes are representative of all racial and ethnic populations [78]. These supertypes share largely overlapping peptide binding specificities, allowing the definition of motifs that predict the binding affinity of a given peptide sequence to specific HLA class I and class II molecules [79,80]. Synthetic peptides representing the predicted CD8+ and CD4+ T cell epitopes can be then synthesized and screened for immune recognition using specimens from individuals experimentally immunized or naturally exposed to the pathogen of interest. The accuracy of these epitope predictions was validated in the malaria model for both CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses, using specimens from RAS immunized and naturally exposed individuals [81,82]. The initial proof-of-concept study for this epitope-based approach to T cell antigen discovery, also conducted in the malaria model, identified a number of proteins recognized by T cells from RAS immunized volunteers [83]. One of those proteins has been shown to be a target of cross-species protection in murine models [84]; in preparation). Subsequently, a more comprehensive study has been undertaken. A subset of ~1500 P. falciparum proteins representing the complete set of putative proteins thought to be expressed in the pre-erythrocytic stage of the P. falciparum parasite and representing approximately 30% of the P. falciparum genome were identified. For each putative protein, class I and class II epitopes restricted by multiple HLA supertype alleles were predicted by computerized algorithms. A set of 20 peptide sequences which bound with high affinity to three MHC class I supertypes and the degenerate HLA-DR class II supertype were synthesized and screened for immune reactivity with specimens from immune or semi-immune individuals ([83,85]; manuscript in preparation). Proteome-wide or sub-proteome screens of T cell targets of CPS or RAS are ongoing or pending. Results to date show that T cell responses to the Plasmodium parasite are broadly distributed in the proteome, rather than narrowly focused on a few immunodominant antigens and epitopes, providing experimental validation of the concept that malaria vaccines should be designed to target multiple antigens rather than one or a few antigens. Studies also identified a prioritized set of antigens which are highly T cell reactive and therefore would be predicted to be excellent target antigens for inclusion in a vaccine designed to prevent Plasmodium infection.
5.2. Antigen Lead Acquisition System (ATLAS)
An alternative T cell antigen discovery platform has been developed in recent years to identify potential antigenic targets using a pan-proteomic screening approach [86] (Figure 1). With this technology, dubbed ATLAS (Antigen Lead Acquisition System), the full proteome of a pathogen is expressed as individual clones in bacterial hosts (E. coli) which are co-cultured with professional antigen presenting cells (APC) derived from the blood of selected human donors. As the APC ingest and process the E. coli-enclosed proteomic library, they process and present peptide epitopes in the context of MHC class I or class II molecules that can be recognized by autologous T cells derived from the same patient. For MHC class I presentation, the E. coli co-express a cytoplasmic variant of Listeria monocytogenes listeriolysin O which forms pores in the acidified endosome which provides access for the expressed protein to the cytosol for processing and presentation though the proteasome/TAP pathway [87,88]. If recognition events occur (hit), a phenotypic readout of T cell activation can be measured (e.g. production of IFN-γ). This approach offers a marked benefit over the use of overlapping peptide pools in that it decreases the number of determinants that need to be screened against (e.g. antigens) while at the same time ensuring that the epitopes are representative of the subject's antigen processing machinery and are always presented in the optimal MHC restriction context. When this platform is used to analyze blood samples from suitably stratified patient cohorts for their responses to a given pathogen, the pattern of responses can be used to infer the identity of pathogen proteins associated with productive, non-productive or even deleterious immune responses. To date, this platform has been applied successfully to identify T cell antigens from several microbial proteomes, with sizes ranging from a few dozen (HSV-2) to a few thousand expressed genes (S. pneumoniae, C. trachomatis) [86,89,90]. Phase 2 clinical trials are currently evaluating a candidate vaccine against Pneumococcus comprised of antigens identified using this technology. Genocea Biosciences Inc. (Cambridge, MA) has built a full-length expressed protein library encompassing a significant fraction of the proteome of P. falciparum (currently about 1,500 expressed proteins). In order to minimize the requirements for blood samples, the library was tailored to genes that have been associated with the pathogen's hepatic development stage, through analysis of proteomic and/or transcriptomic data for the murine strain P. yoelii and for which clearly identified orthologs existed in the published genome of P. falciparum [91,92]. This library has been further refined using a high quality proteome analysis of P. falciparum sporozoites as well as liver stage parasites differentiated in humanized mice (S. Kappe, personal communication). Preliminary screens with retained samples from RAS and CPS-immunized subjects demonstrate that this technology is capable of identifying effector memory (TEM) responses against specific P. falciparum antigens (data unpublished). The nature of these types of screens, combined with the low frequencies of circulating P. falciparum -specific TEM cells requires a fairly large number of samples to be analyzed before antigenic hits can be confirmed with statistical confidence. The completion of upcoming clinical trials involving RAS and CPS regimens and the availability of additional samples in late 2015 hopefully will confirm initial trends observed with the ATLAS technology. Finally, building a more complete library for this screening platform may ultimately be needed given the evidence that cross-stage antigens (e.g. blood stage) could be important for protection. This should prompt further technological developments to decrease the blood volume requirements while at the same time maintain the ability to detect low frequency antigen-specific TEM cells. These further developments may prove timely and useful for a wide range of immune-profiling projects.
Figure 1. T cell antigen discovery using ATLAS™ for Plasmodium falciparum.
(A) ATLAS™ screening in the context of subjects immunized with live-attenuated malaria vaccination regimen. Blood from subjects immunized with RAS or CPS is collected prior to CHMI and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) are isolated using conventional methods (Ficoll gradient). Adherent cells are recovered for differentiation into Monocyte – Derived Dendritic Cells (MDDC) which will serve as antigen presenting cells (APC) in the ATLAS assay, while CD4 and CD8 T cells subsets are amplified separately following bead purification. At completion of differentiation, MDDC are plated on libraries of E. coli bacteria expressing pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum antigen identified from sporozoites and/or liver stages. APC are allowed to process the bacteria and their Plasmodium cargo for autologous presentation in the context of MHC Class I or II to T cells derived from the same subject. After incubation, culture supernatants are recovered and analyzed for the presence of secreted cytokines (IFN-γ) which act as biochemical marker of antigen recognition and T cell activation. Patterns of T cell activation are compared across subjects and immunization cohorts allowing differential identification of T cell antigens associated with protection from CHMI. (B) Detail of antigen presentation to CD4+ (left panel) and CD8+ (right panel) T cells in the ATLAS™ assay. Plasmodium protein expressing E. coli clones are phagocytized by differentiated MDDC, which will lead to their degradation in late phagolysosomes and presentation of degradation peptides to autologous CD4 T cells on MHC Class II molecules (left panel). When bacteria contain a cytoplasmic variant of Listeria monocytogenes listeriolysin O (cLLO), acidification of the late phagolysosome leads to formation of pores in the vesicles’ membrane, allowing cytoplasmic escape of partly degraded E. coli and plasmodium cargo content, followed by processing by the proteasome and presentation to autologous CD8+ T cells in the context of MHC Class II molecules (right panel).
6. Transcriptomic approaches to antigen discovery
The premise for transcriptome-based discovery is that pathogen life cycle stages or phenotypes that are targets of vaccines should upregulate a specific subset of genes encoding protective antigens. As an example, increased transcription of genes encoding antigenic proteins has been shown for Neisseria meningitidis serogoup B and led to the identification of new vaccine candidates that protected mice against meningococcus and have been included in the human meningococcal vaccine [93,94].
In the case of malaria, parasite transcriptomes can be exploited in two ways for vaccine antigen discovery [95]. First, where a specific parasite stage or parasite phenotype is the target for a vaccine strategy, then differential transcriptional profiling can be used to define its discrete antigens. Second, where an immune response has been associated with protection, expression libraries that represent the translated products of the parasite transcriptome can be screened for recognition by protective antibodies or T cells.
6.1. Deciphering differential transcriptomes to identify vaccine targets
P. falciparum gene expression during different parasite life cycle stages was first profiled by microarrays [4,5]. In one study of cDNA from nine stages (sporozoite stage, seven asexual erythrocytic stages, two gametocyte stages), 4,557 of 5,159 predicted genes were detected [4]. Genes with similar or related functions clustered in expression profiles, and cross-hybridization studies indicated that most genes are well conserved. Subsequent studies showed that field isolates could be reliably studied by microarray [96] or by RNA sequencing studies [97]. While most genes are largely invariant across strains, some highly variable genes (e.g., var, rif, stevor, and msp2 genes) have generally reduced signals by microarrays [98,99]. Because the host immune system drives sequence variation, these variable genes may include important vaccine candidates. In particular, var genes encode large variant antigens (200- to 400-kDa) implicated in adhesion to vascular receptors [100], and therefore believed to impart parasite virulence. There are 59 var genes in the 3D7 P. falciparum genome and similar numbers in other strains [101]. Placental malaria vaccines provide a good example for blood stage antigen discovery by transcriptomic approaches. Infected erythrocytes (IE) bind CSA in the placenta, but do not bind CD36, ICAM-1, or other endothelial receptors that commonly support binding of other parasites [102]. Women become resistant to placental malaria as they acquire antibodies against placental IE [103]. This suggests that IE express a finite number of antigens or epitopes during pregnancy that are not displayed during childhood infections. qPCR of all known var genes in CSA-selected laboratory parasites revealed that PFL0030c, now known as var2csa, was transcribed at higher levels than in non-selected parasites [104]; var2csa is also upregulated in isolates from pregnant women [105,106].
Subsequently, microarray and RNA sequencing studies have extended our knowledge of the placental IE transcriptome. Microarray studies of parasites collected from pregnant Tanzanian women identified a suite of eight upregulated invariant genes, and confirmed upregulation of var2csa [96]. The genes included in this suite predict proteins with transmembrane and/or signal sequences as well as putative export (PEXEL or VTS) motifs [107,108] , as might be expected for candidate vaccine antigens against placental IE. Among these, PFD1140w has a PEXEL sequence, while PFL0050c and PFI1785w each have a VTS motif. PFI1785w belongs to a P. falciparum family composed of 16 uncharacterized hypothetical genes, most of which have predicted export sequences (www.PlasmoDB.org). Two genes are members of the HISTa gene family, consisting of 42 paralogs in P. falciparum that encode proteins with putative PEXEL sequences [109]. Finally, PF10_0013 has an atypical PEXEL motif with isoleucine rather than leucine at residue 3, and has been localized to the Maurer's cleft by proteomic analysis [110]. Results obtained by microarray have been confirmed by next-generation sequencing of RNA (RNAseq). Because it yields digital signal, RNAseq displays a much broader dynamic range than microarrays, without the problems of saturation or cross-hybridization [111]. Further, RNAseq can sometimes provide information on transcription even where underlying genomic sequence is not fully defined. Therefore, RNAseq is better suited for studies of P. falciparum field isolates, including studies of their variable surface antigens where full sequences are missing. The robustness of the RNAseq technique has been demonstrated by its ability to identify the known placental IE transcriptome [97]. This includes the variant antigen var2csa. Four other invariant genes previously identified by microarray studies [96] were also amongst the most upregulated genes in RNAseq studies of IE from pregnant women (PFB0115w and 3 members of the variant gene family of exported pHIST proteins (PFD1140w, PFL0050c, and MAL13P1.470).
6.2. Serologic screening of transcriptome expression libraries to identify vaccine targets
In contrast to placental malaria where the parasite phenotype is clear, the pathogenesis of severe malaria in children remains largely unknown, and differential transcriptome studies have been less successful for identifying vaccine candidates. Two DNA microarray studies failed to identify parasite genes whose expression was related to disease severity [112,113]. RNAseq of clinical P. falciparum isolates using not-so-random (NSR) primers identified a subset of 4 parasite transcripts that distinguished parasites infecting children from those infecting pregnant women, but these RNAseq studies did not assess whether these genes played a role in severe malaria syndromes [97].
In place of differential transcriptomic approaches, severe malaria vaccine antigen discovery has recently employed serologic screening to survey the transcriptome. Human residents of endemic areas develop protective immunity that limits parasitemia and disease. Using a cDNA library–based differential screening method [114] and plasma and epidemiologic data from a Tanzanian birth cohort [115], the protein products of the P. falciparum blood-stage transcriptome were surveyed. Plasma from “resistant” and ‘susceptible” 2-year-old children, defined by their control of blood stage parasite density, were used to identify targets of protective antibody responses [116]. This approach identified two previously unknown hypothetical genes as well as MSP-7, a known vaccine candidate [117].
Among the hypothetical genes, PfSEA-1 was shown to localize to the schizont/parasitophorous vacuole membrane, Maurer's clefts, and the inner leaflet of the RBC membrane in schizont-infected RBCs. Antibodies to PfSEA-1 significantly attenuated parasite growth by arresting schizont egress from infected RBCs, and immunization with the PbSEA-1 ortholog conferred protection to mice against a lethal P. berghei ANKA challenge. Naturally acquired antibodies to PfSEA-1 were associated with significant protection from severe malaria in young Tanzanian children, and with significant protection against parasitemia in adolescents and young adults in Kenya [116].
These studies strongly support PfSEA-1 as a candidate for pediatric falciparum malaria, as well as the general approach of differential screening of cDNA libraries with carefully curated serum sets. The second hypothetical protein identified by serologic screening was GARP (glutamic acid rich protein). Interestingly, GARP was earlier identified by RNAseq as one of four parasite transcripts specifically associated with parasites infecting children [97]. Because GARP is only encoded in the P. falciparum and P. reichenowi genomes, future characterization of its potential as a vaccine target will await studies that use the human parasite, possibly in monkey models that support P. falciparum infection.
7. Antigen targets of protective immunity
It should be noted, however, that only a fraction of the reactive antigens discovered using high throughput screening approaches are likely to be protective vaccine candidates. Identifying such candidates requires both the careful choice of input samples used for high throughput antibody or T cell based screening, as well as down-selection filtering of the output list of antigens discovered. A simple comparison of disease cases (exposed) with disease-free (unexposed) controls could reveal both protective antigens and other antigens that play no role in protection. In the context of vaccine design for malaria, for example, it is desirable to directly compare the response of individuals who are protected versus those who are not unprotected, as in for example, profiling P. falciparum reactivity in sera from children in Mali [34] or controlled human malaria infection following immunization with radiation attenuated sporozoites [35]s. Those studies identified 46 antigens that were preferentially recognized by asymptomatic children as compared with age-matched children who suffered from malaria, and 16 antigens that were associated with infection-blocking immunity against sporozoite challenge, respectively. After high throughput screening, protection can be assessed in animal models, such as the stringent P. yoelii rodent model of malaria. Usually, however, the number of candidates identified by in vitro high throughput screening is large and additional filtering is required prior to in vivo assessment, since immunizing animals with selected antigens, peptides or peptide pools and evaluating protection is only possible for limited numbers of targets. Computational filters can be used to rank-order candidate antigens from large lists of potential antigens of interest. In the case of antibody targets, predicted surface-location or presence of signal peptides, transmembrane domains or PEXEL motifs may qualify a novel candidate for further investigation. Unlike antibodies which need to access surface structures, protective T cell epitopes can be located anywhere in the proteome of the pathogen, and there are currently no validated in silico algorithms which can predict T cell reactivity from sequence data. However, factors such as the absence of human homology determined by blasting the pathogen sequence against the human proteome database can be very informative. Also, for both antibodies and T cells, conservation of the antigen target between P. falciparum strains and even among all Plasmodium species are would be desirable characteristics for a vaccine with widespread coverage.
8. Future directions for malaria antigen discovery
While more work remains to be done on both asexual blood stages and sporozoite stages for vaccine antigen discovery, other life cycle stages also provide opportunities. Liver stage parasites are known to be a target of protective immunity in animal and human studies, but the relative inaccessibility of these parasites in the large mass of the liver has allowed only incomplete success to define transcriptomes and proteomes [92]. Further, the protective immune response to pre-erythrocytic parasites is complex, and may involve antibody, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells [20,21]. This complicates the effort to discern candidate antigens from the liver-stage of the parasite life cycle, especially those not also expressed in sporozoite or asexual blood stages, or to use antibody to screen for protective antigens. Overcoming this challenge will aid in the identification of specific target antigens recognized by RAS-induced protective immune responses, which are thought to be mediated predominantly by CD8+ T cell responses directed at antigens expressed in the liver stage [19,21,22,65].
Another area of increasing interest over the past few years is the development of a malaria vaccine that can block transmission, in response to the challenge by Bill and Melinda Gates in 2007 for global malaria eradication [118] and the subsequent Malaria Eradication Agenda (http://malera.tropika.net). Transmission-blocking vaccines that target parasite antigens expressed during mosquito stages represent a more tractable target for antigen discovery efforts, owing to the greater accessibility of these parasite stages. Because antibody mediates the protective effect of these vaccines, serologic screening of sexual stage cDNA libraries offers a promising approach to new antigen discovery. Serum sets for such studies may come from animals vaccinated with whole parasite preparations from the relevant stages (gametocytes, gametes, zygotes), or may come from naturally exposed individuals who acquire antibodies with transmission-blocking activity.
9. Summary
Herein, we have described a series of distinct large-scale screening approaches to malaria vaccine antigen discovery which take advantage of the rich information in genomic, proteomic and transcriptomic datasets. Such approaches enable the discovery of new antigenic targets of antibody or T cell responses which can be prioritized for clinical evaluation. In our opinion, such genome-based approaches offer enormous potential for the development of a vaccine against a parasite which has co-evolved with the human host for thousands of years and which remains a major problem for global public health.
Highlights.
Plasmodium genomic sequence can be mined to identify novel targets of antibody or T cell responses
Several distinct platforms and approaches can be used
Targets of high throughput screening can protect against parasite challenge
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude and thanks to the many colleagues central to the studies reported herein. In particular, DLD would like to thank Alessandro Sette, John Sidney and Bjorn Peters for their efforts developing the T cell algorithm prediction method for antigen discovery; Bruno Douradinha, Leanne Robinson, Danielle Stansic, Ivo Mueller, Peter Siba and the staff at Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research for the collection of specimens from Papua New Guinea; and Joanne Roddick, Lea Lekieffre and Carla Proietti for laboratory assays and analysis. DHD and PLF wish to thank their numerous collaborators especially, Peter Crompton, Alyssa Barry, Chris Plowe, Joeseph Vinetz, Bryan Greenhouse, James Kazura, and Kevin Marsh for the opportunity to analyze sera samples from many different locations around the world and for their stimulating discussion. We would also like to thank the many volunteers who generously donated their specimens for analysis, without who this research could not have been conducted. PD is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIAID, NIH. DLD is supported by a Principal Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia. Funding support from NIH for the studies reported herein is gratefully acknowledged.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Abbreviations: ATLAS, Antigen Lead Acquisition System; CHMI, Controlled Human Malaria Infection; CPS, ChemoProphylaxis and Sporozoites; Hb, haemoglobin; IE, infected erythrocytes; ITV, infection–treatment–vaccination; NAI, naturally acquired immunity; NSR, not-so-random; RAS, Radiation-Attenuated Sporozoites
Conflict of Interest Statement:
DLD and PD have no financial interests to disclose. DHD and PLF disclose a financial interest in Antigen Discovery Inc., which has licensed a protein microarray technology. DHD, PLF and the University of California, Irvine may financially benefit from this interest if the company is successful in marketing its products that are related to this research. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California, Irvine, in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
References
- 1.Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2002;419:498–511. doi: 10.1038/nature01097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Florens L, Washburn MP, Raine JD, Anthony RM, Grainger M, et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature. 2002;419:520–526. doi: 10.1038/nature01107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lasonder E, Ishihama Y, Andersen JS, Vermunt AM, Pain A, et al. Analysis of the Plasmodium falciparum proteome by high-accuracy mass spectrometry. Nature. 2002;419:537–542. doi: 10.1038/nature01111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Le Roch KG, Zhou Y, Blair PL, Grainger M, Moch JK, et al. Discovery of gene function by expression profiling of the malaria parasite life cycle. Science. 2003;301:1503–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.1087025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bozdech Z, Llinas M, Pulliam BL, Wong ED, Zhu J, et al. The transcriptome of the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:E5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schwartz L, Brown GV, Genton B, Moorthy VS. A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table. Malar J. 2012;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 1995;269:496–512. doi: 10.1126/science.7542800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pizza M, Scarlato V, Masignani V, Giuliani MM, Arico B, et al. Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science. 2000;287:1816–1820. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Klysik J. Concept of immunomics: a new frontier in the battle for gene function? Acta Biotheor. 2001;49:191–202. doi: 10.1023/a:1011901410166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Doolan DL. Plasmodium immunomics. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:3–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.malERA Consultative Group on Vaccines A research agenda for malaria eradication: vaccines. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Baird JK. Age-dependent characteristics of protection versus susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998;92:367–390. doi: 10.1080/00034989859366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Doolan DL, Dobano C, Baird JK. Acquired immunity to malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:13–36. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00025-08. Table of Contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cohen S, Mc GI, Carrington S. Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. Nature. 1961;192:733–737. doi: 10.1038/192733a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sabchareon A, Burnouf T, Ouattara D, Attanath P, Bouharoun-Tayoun H, et al. Parasitologic and clinical human response to immunoglobulin administration in falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;45:297–308. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1991.45.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nussenzweig RS, Vanderberg J, Most H, Orton C. Protective immunity produced by the injection of X-irradiated sporozoites of Plasmodium berghei. Nature. 1967;216:160–162. doi: 10.1038/216160a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gwadz RW, Cochrane AH, Nussenzweig V, Nussenzweig RS. Preliminary studies on vaccination of rhesus monkeys with irradiated sporozoites of Plasmodium knowlesi and characterization of surface antigens of these parasites. Bull World Health Organ. 1979;57(Suppl 1):165–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hoffman SL, Goh LM, Luke TC, Schneider I, Le TP, et al. Protection of humans against malaria by immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1155–1164. doi: 10.1086/339409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weiss WR, Jiang CG. Protective CD8+ T lymphocytes in primates immunized with malaria sporozoites. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schofield L, Villaquiran J, Ferreira A, Schellekens H, Nussenzweig R, et al. Gamma interferon, CD8+ T cells and antibodies required for immunity to malaria sporozoites. Nature. 1987;330:664–666. doi: 10.1038/330664a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Doolan DL, Hoffman SL. The complexity of protective immunity against liver-stage malaria. J Immunol. 2000;165:1453–1462. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsuji M. A retrospective evaluation of the role of T cells in the development of malaria vaccine. Exp Parasitol. 2010;126:421–425. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beaudoin RL, Strome CPA, Mitchell F, Tubergen TA. Plasmodium berghei: immunization of mice against the ANKA strain using the unaltered sporozoite as an antigen. ExpParasitol. 1977;42:1–5. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(77)90054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Orjih AU, Cochrane AH, Nussenzweig RS. Comparative studies on the immunogenicity of infective and attenuated sporozoites of Plasmodium berghei. TransRSocTropMedHyg. 1982;76:57–61. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Belnoue E, Costa FT, Frankenberg T, Vigario AM, Voza T, et al. Protective T cell immunity against malaria liver stage after vaccination with live sporozoites under chloroquine treatment. J Immunol. 2004;172:2487–2495. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.4.2487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tse SW, Cockburn IA, Zhang H, Scott AL, Zavala F. Unique transcriptional profile of liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells induced by immunization with malaria sporozoites. Genes Immun. 2013;14:302–309. doi: 10.1038/gene.2013.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Murphy SC, Kas A, Stone BC, Bevan MJ. A T-cell response to a liver-stage Plasmodium antigen is not boosted by repeated sporozoite immunizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:6055–6060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303834110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aguiar JC, LaBaer J, Blair PL, Shamailova VY, Koundinya M, et al. High-throughput generation of P. falciparum functional molecules by recombinational cloning. Genome Res. 2004;14:2076–2082. doi: 10.1101/gr.2416604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mehlin C, Boni E, Buckner FS, Engel L, Feist T, et al. Heterologous expression of proteins from Plasmodium falciparum: results from 1000 genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006;148:144–160. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vedadi M, Lew J, Artz J, Amani M, Zhao Y, et al. Genome-scale protein expression and structural biology of Plasmodium falciparum and related Apicomplexan organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007;151:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Birkholtz LM, Blatch G, Coetzer TL, Hoppe HC, Human E, et al. Heterologous expression of plasmodial proteins for structural studies and functional annotation. Malar J. 2008;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Noe AR, Espinosa D, Li X, Coelho-Dos-Reis JG, Funakoshi R, et al. A full-length Plasmodium falciparum recombinant circumsporozoite protein expressed by Pseudomonas fluorescens platform as a malaria vaccine candidate. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Doolan DL, Mu Y, Unal B, Sundaresh S, Hirst S, et al. Profiling humoral immune responses to P. falciparum infection with protein microarrays. Proteomics. 2008;8:4680–4694. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Crompton PD, Kayala MA, Traore B, Kayentao K, Ongoiba A, et al. A prospective analysis of the Ab response to Plasmodium falciparum before and after a malaria season by protein microarray. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:6958–6963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001323107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trieu A, Kayala MA, Burk C, Molina DM, Freilich DA, et al. Sterile protective immunity to malaria is associated with a panel of novel P. falciparum antigens. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10:M111 007948. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.007948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davies DH, Liang X, Hernandez JE, Randall A, Hirst S, et al. Profiling the humoral immune response to infection by using proteome microarrays: High-throughput vaccine and diagnostic antigen discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:547–552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408782102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vigil A, Ortega R, Jain A, Nakajima-Sasaki R, Tan X, et al. Identification of the feline humoral immune response to Bartonella henselae infection by protein microarray. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kunnath-Velayudhan S, Salamon H, Wang HY, Davidow AL, Molina DM, et al. Dynamic antibody responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14703–14708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sundaresh S, Doolan DL, Hirst S, Mu Y, Unal B, et al. Identification of humoral immune responses in protein microarrays using DNA microarray data analysis techniques. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1760–1766. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liang L, Leng D, Burk C, Nakajima-Sasaki R, Kayala MA, et al. Large scale immune profiling of infected humans and goats reveals differential recognition of Brucella melitensis antigens. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Molina DM, Pal S, Kayala MA, Teng A, Kim PJ, et al. Identification of immunodominant antigens of Chlamydia trachomatis using proteome microarrays. Vaccine. 2010;28:3014–3024. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Eyles JE, Unal B, Hartley MG, Newstead SL, Flick-Smith H, et al. Immunodominant Francisella tularensis antigens identified using proteome microarray. Proteomics. 2007;7:2172–2183. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sundaresh S, Randall A, Unal B, Petersen JM, Belisle JT, et al. From protein microarrays to diagnostic antigen discovery: a study of the pathogen Francisella tularensis. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:i508–i518. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Felgner PL, Kayala MA, Vigil A, Burk C, Nakajima-Sasaki R, et al. A Burkholderia pseudomallei protein microarray reveals serodiagnostic and cross-reactive antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13499–13504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812080106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tippayawat P, Saenwongsa W, Mahawantung J, Suwannasaen D, Chetchotisakd P, et al. Phenotypic and functional characterization of human memory T cell responses to Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beare PA, Chen C, Bouman T, Pablo J, Unal B, et al. Candidate Q fever serodiagnostic antigens revealed by immunoscreening a Coxiella burnetii protein microarray. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 doi: 10.1128/CVI.00300-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen C, Bouman TJ, Beare PA, Mertens K, Zhang GQ, et al. A systematic approach to evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses to Coxiella burnetii immunoreactive antigens. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(Suppl 2):156–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02206.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vigil A, Ortega R, Nakajima-Sasaki R, Pablo J, Molina DM, et al. Genome-wide profiling of humoral immune response to Coxiella burnetii infection by protein microarray. Proteomics. 2010;10:2259–2269. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barbour AG, Jasinskas A, Kayala MA, Davies DH, Steere AC, et al. A genome-wide proteome array reveals a limited set of immunogens in natural infections of humans and white-footed mice with Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3374–3389. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00048-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Doskaya M, Kalantari-Dehaghi M, Walsh CM, Hiszczynska-Sawicka E, Davies DH, et al. GRA1 protein vaccine confers better immune response compared to codon-optimized GRA1 DNA vaccine. Vaccine. 2007;25:1824–1837. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mochon AB, Jin Y, Kayala MA, Wingard JR, Clancy CJ, et al. Serological profiling of a Candida albicans protein microarray reveals permanent host-pathogen interplay and stage-specific responses during candidemia. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000827. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Driguez P, Doolan DL, Loukas A, Felgner PL, McManus DP. Schistosomiasis vaccine discovery using immunomics. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:4. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-3-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Davies DH, McCausland MM, Valdez C, Huynh D, Hernandez JE, et al. Vaccinia virus H3L envelope protein is a major target of neutralizing antibodies in humans and elicits protection against lethal challenge in mice. J Virol. 2005;79:11724–11733. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.18.11724-11733.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Davies DH, Molina DM, Wrammert J, Miller J, Hirst S, et al. Proteome-wide analysis of the serological response to vaccinia and smallpox. Proteomics. 2007;7:1678–1686. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Davies DH, Wyatt LS, Newman FK, Earl PL, Chun S, et al. Antibody profiling by proteome microarray reveals the immunogenicity of the attenuated smallpox vaccine modified vaccinia virus ankara is comparable to that of Dryvax. J Virol. 2008;82:652–663. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01706-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Luevano M, Bernard HU, Barrera-Saldana HA, Trevino V, Garcia-Carranca A, et al. High-throughput profiling of the humoral immune responses against thirteen human papillomavirus types by proteome microarrays. Virology. 2010;405:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Torres KJ, Castrillon CE, Moss EL, Saito M, Tenorio R, et al. Genome-Level Determination of Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage targets of malarial clinical immunity in the Peruvian Amazon. J Infect Dis. 2014 doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Baum E, Badu K, Molina DM, Liang X, Felgner PL, et al. Protein microarray analysis of antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum in western Kenyan highland sites with differing transmission levels. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nnedu ON, O'Leary MP, Mutua D, Mutai B, Kalantari-Dehaghi M, et al. Humoral immune responses to Plasmodium falciparum among HIV-1-infected Kenyan adults. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2011;5:613–623. doi: 10.1002/prca.201100021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Barry AE, Trieu A, Fowkes FJ, Pablo J, Kalantari-Dehaghi M, et al. The stability and complexity of antibody responses to the major surface antigen of Plasmodium falciparum are associated with age in a malaria endemic area. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10:M111.008326. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.008326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Travassos MA, Niangaly A, Bailey JA, Ouattara A, Coulibaly D, et al. Seroreactivity to Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 intracellular domain in malaria-exposed children and adults. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:1514–1519. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tan X, Traore B, Kayentao K, Ongoiba A, Doumbo S, et al. Hemoglobin S and C heterozygosity enhances neither the magnitude nor breadth of antibody responses to a diverse array of Plasmodium falciparum antigens. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1750–1761. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hoffman SL, Billingsley PF, James E, Richman A, Loyevsky M, et al. Development of a metabolically active, non-replicating sporozoite vaccine to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Hum Vaccin. 2010;6:97–106. doi: 10.4161/hv.6.1.10396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Epstein JE, Tewari K, Lyke KE, Sim BK, Billingsley PF, et al. Live attenuated malaria vaccine designed to protect through hepatic CD8(+) T cell immunity. Science. 2011;334:475–480. doi: 10.1126/science.1211548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Seder RA, Chang LJ, Enama ME, Zephir KL, Sarwar UN, et al. Protection against malaria by intravenous immunization with a nonreplicating sporozoite vaccine. Science. 2013;341:1359–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.1241800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shekalaghe S, Rutaihwa M, Billingsley PF, Chemba M, Daubenberger CA, et al. Controlled human malaria infection of Tanzanians by intradermal injection of aseptic, purified, cryopreserved Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:471–480. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hodgson SH, Juma E, Salim A, Magiri C, Njenga D, et al. Lessons learnt from the first controlled human malaria infection study conducted in Nairobi, Kenya. Malar J. 2015;14:182. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0671-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mordmuller B, Supan C, Sim KL, Gomez-Perez GP, Ospina Salazar CL, et al. Direct venous inoculation of Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites for controlled human malaria infection: a dose-finding trial in two centres. Malar J. 2015;14:117. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0628-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Felgner PL, Roestenberg M, Liang L, Hung C, Jain A, et al. Pre-erythrocytic antibody profiles induced by controlled human malaria infections in healthy volunteers under chloroquine prophylaxis. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3549. doi: 10.1038/srep03549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ballou WR, Cahill CP. Two decades of commitment to malaria vaccine development: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:289–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kester KE, Cummings JF, Ofori-Anyinam O, Ockenhouse CF, Krzych U, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase 2a trial of falciparum malaria vaccines RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A in malaria-naive adults: safety, efficacy, and immunologic associates of protection. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:337–346. doi: 10.1086/600120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.RTS, S Clinical Trials Partnership Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60721-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Campo JJ, Dobano C, Sacarlal J, Guinovart C, Mayor A, et al. Impact of the RTS,S malaria vaccine candidate on naturally acquired antibody responses to multiple asexual blood stage antigens. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Campo JJ, Aponte JJ, Skinner J, Nakajima R, Molina DM, et al. RTS,S vaccination is associated with serologic evidence of decreased exposure to Plasmodium falciparum liver and blood stage parasites. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Grubaugh D, Flechtner JB, Higgins DE. Proteins as T cell antigens: methods for high-throughput identification. Vaccine. 2013;31:3805–3810. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sette A, Vitiello A, Reherman B, Fowler P, Nayersina R, et al. The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. J Immunol. 1994;153:5586–5592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sidney J, Assarsson E, Moore C, Ngo S, Pinilla C, et al. Quantitative peptide binding motifs for 19 human and mouse MHC class I molecules derived using positional scanning combinatorial peptide libraries. Immunome Res. 2008;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1745-7580-4-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sette A, Sidney J. Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism. Immunogenetics. 1999;50:201–212. doi: 10.1007/s002510050594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sidney J, del Guercio M-F, Southwood S, Engelhard VH, Appella E, et al. Several HLA alleles share overlapping peptide specificities. J Immunol. 1995;154:247–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Southwood S, Sidney J, Kondo A, del Guercio MF, Appella E, et al. Several common HLADR types share largely overlapping peptide binding repertoires. J Immunol. 1998;160:3363–3373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Doolan DL, Hoffman SL, Southwood S, Wentworth PA, Sidney J, et al. Degenerate cytotoxic T cell epitopes from P. falciparum restricted by multiple HLA-A and HLA-B supertype alleles. Immunity. 1997;7:97–112. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80513-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Doolan DL, Southwood S, Chesnut R, Appella E, Gomez E, et al. HLA-DR-promiscuous T cell epitopes from Plasmodium falciparum pre-erythrocytic-stage antigens restricted by multiple HLA class II alleles. J Immunol. 2000;165:1123–1137. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Doolan DL, Southwood S, Freilich DA, Sidney J, Graber NL, et al. Identification of Plasmodium falciparum antigens by antigenic analysis of genomic and proteomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9952–9957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633254100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bergmann-Leitner ES, Mease RM, De La Vega P, Savranskaya T, Polhemus M, et al. Immunization with pre-erythrocytic antigen CelTOS from Plasmodium falciparum elicits cross-species protection against heterologous challenge with Plasmodium berghei. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Doolan DL, Douradinha B, Roddick J, Robinson L, Taraika J, et al. Immunology, genomics and vaccine development: proteome-wide screening of P. falciparum CD4 and CD8 T cell epitopes.. 40th Australasian Society of Immunology Annual Meeting; Perth, WA, Australia. 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Picard MD, Cohane KP, Gierahn TM, Higgins DE, Flechtner JB. High-throughput proteomic screening identifies Chlamydia trachomatis antigens that are capable of eliciting T cell and antibody responses that provide protection against vaginal challenge. Vaccine. 2012;30:4387–4393. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bouwer HG, Alberti-Segui C, Montfort MJ, Berkowitz ND, Higgins DE. Directed antigen delivery as a vaccine strategy for an intracellular bacterial pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5102–5107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509381103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hu PQ, Tuma-Warrino RJ, Bryan MA, Mitchell KG, Higgins DE, et al. Escherichia coli expressing recombinant antigen and listeriolysin O stimulate class I-restricted CD8+ T cells following uptake by human APC. J Immunol. 2004;172:1595–1601. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Moffitt KL, Gierahn TM, Lu YJ, Gouveia P, Alderson M, et al. T(H)17-based vaccine design for prevention of Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9:158–165. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Long D, Skoberne M, Gierahn TM, Larson S, Price JA, et al. Identification of novel virus-specific antigens by CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells from asymptomatic HSV-2 seropositive and seronegative donors. Virology. 2014;464-465:296–311. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kaiser K, Matuschewski K, Camargo N, Ross J, Kappe SH. Differential transcriptome profiling identifies Plasmodium genes encoding pre-erythrocytic stage-specific proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51:1221–1232. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tarun AS, Peng X, Dumpit RF, Ogata Y, Silva-Rivera H, et al. A combined transcriptome and proteome survey of malaria parasite liver stages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:305–310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710780104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Grifantini R, Bartolini E, Muzzi A, Draghi M, Frigimelica E, et al. Previously unrecognized vaccine candidates against group B meningococcus identified by DNA microarrays. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:914–921. doi: 10.1038/nbt728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Malito E, Biancucci M, Faleri A, Ferlenghi I, Scarselli M, et al. Structure of the meningococcal vaccine antigen NadA and epitope mapping of a bactericidal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:17128–17133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419686111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Duffy PE, Krzych U, Francis S, Fried M. Malaria vaccines: using models of immunity and functional genomics tools to accelerate the development of vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum. Vaccine. 2005;23:2235–2242. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Francis SE, Malkov VA, Oleinikov AV, Rossnagle E, Wendler JP, et al. Six genes are preferentially transcribed by the circulating and sequestered forms of Plasmodium falciparum parasites that infect pregnant women. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4838–4850. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00635-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vignali M, Armour CD, Chen J, Morrison R, Castle JC, et al. NSR-seq transcriptional profiling enables identification of a gene signature of Plasmodium falciparum parasites infecting children. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1119–1129. doi: 10.1172/JCI43457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Mok BW, Ribacke U, Winter G, Yip BH, Tan CS, et al. Comparative transcriptomal analysis of isogenic Plasmodium falciparum clones of distinct antigenic and adhesive phenotypes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007;151:184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Young JA, Fivelman QL, Blair PL, de la Vega P, Le Roch KG, et al. The Plasmodium falciparum sexual development transcriptome: a microarray analysis using ontology-based pattern identification. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;143:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Smith JD, Gamain B, Baruch DI, Kyes S. Decoding the language of var genes and Plasmodium falciparum sequestration. Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:538–545. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)02079-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kraemer SM, Kyes SA, Aggarwal G, Springer AL, Nelson SO, et al. Patterns of gene recombination shape var gene repertoires in Plasmodium falciparum: comparisons of geographically diverse isolates. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Fried M, Duffy PE. Adherence of Plasmodium falciparum to chondroitin sulfate A in the human placenta. Science. 1996;272:1502–1504. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5267.1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Fried M, Nosten F, Brockman A, Brabin BJ, Duffy PE. Maternal antibodies block malaria. Nature. 1998;395:851–852. doi: 10.1038/27570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Salanti A, Staalsoe T, Lavstsen T, Jensen AT, Sowa MP, et al. Selective upregulation of a single distinctly structured var gene in chondroitin sulphate A-adhering Plasmodium falciparum involved in pregnancy-associated malaria. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:179–191. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Duffy MF, Byrne TJ, Elliott SR, Wilson DW, Rogerson SJ, et al. Broad analysis reveals a consistent pattern of var gene transcription in Plasmodium falciparum repeatedly selected for a defined adhesion phenotype. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56:774–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04577.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Elliott SR, Duffy MF, Byrne TJ, Beeson JG, Mann EJ, et al. Cross-reactive surface epitopes on chondroitin sulfate A-adherent Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes are associated with transcription of var2csa. Infect Immun. 2005;73:2848–2856. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2848-2856.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hiller NL, Bhattacharjee S, van Ooij C, Liolios K, Harrison T, et al. A host-targeting signal in virulence proteins reveals a secretome in malarial infection. Science. 2004;306:1934–1937. doi: 10.1126/science.1102737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Marti M, Good RT, Rug M, Knuepfer E, Cowman AF. Targeting malaria virulence and remodeling proteins to the host erythrocyte. Science. 2004;306:1930–1933. doi: 10.1126/science.1102452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Sargeant TJ, Marti M, Caler E, Carlton JM, Simpson K, et al. Lineage-specific expansion of proteins exported to erythrocytes in malaria parasites. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Vincensini L, Richert S, Blisnick T, Van Dorsselaer A, Leize-Wagner E, et al. Proteomic analysis identifies novel proteins of the Maurer's clefts, a secretory compartment delivering Plasmodium falciparum proteins to the surface of its host cell. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4:582–593. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M400176-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shendure J. The beginning of the end for microarrays? Nat Methods. 2008;5:585–587. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0708-585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Daily JP, Scanfeld D, Pochet N, Le Roch K, Plouffe D, et al. Distinct physiological states of Plasmodium falciparum in malaria-infected patients. Nature. 2007;450:1091–1095. doi: 10.1038/nature06311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Lemieux JE, Gomez-Escobar N, Feller A, Carret C, Amambua-Ngwa A, et al. Statistical estimation of cell-cycle progression and lineage commitment in Plasmodium falciparum reveals a homogeneous pattern of transcription in ex vivo culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7559–7564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811829106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Nixon CP, Friedman JF, Knopf PM, Duffy PE, Kurtis JD. Protective human immunity as a vaccine discovery tool for falciparum malaria. Transfusion. 2005;45:81s–87s. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Mutabingwa TK, Bolla MC, Li JL, Domingo GJ, Li X, et al. Maternal malaria and gravidity interact to modify infant susceptibility to malaria. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Raj DK, Nixon CP, Nixon CE, Dvorin JD, DiPetrillo CG, et al. Antibodies to PfSEA-1 block parasite egress from RBCs and protect against malaria infection. Science. 2014;344:871–877. doi: 10.1126/science.1254417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Spaccapelo R, Aime E, Caterbi S, Arcidiacono P, Capuccini B, et al. Disruption of plasmepsin-4 and merozoites surface protein-7 genes in Plasmodium berghei induces combined virulence-attenuated phenotype. Sci Rep. 2011;1:39. doi: 10.1038/srep00039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Roberts L, Enserink M. Malaria. Did they really say ... eradication? Science. 2007;318:1544–1545. doi: 10.1126/science.318.5856.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

