Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1965 Jul;18(4):428–431. doi: 10.1136/jcp.18.4.428

Serological grouping of urinary Escherichia coli

James McGeachie 1
PMCID: PMC472971  PMID: 14318692

Abstract

Using only 12 antisera it has been possible to group 56·6% of all strains. Forty-four per cent of all strains were typable in the first eight of the serological groups used. Of the primary isolates from symptomatic infections, 65·7% were typable; 48·6% of all strains of the serological groups 01, 02, 04, and 06 occurred in these primary symptomatic isolates.

There was a good correlation in the serological typing of five colonies isolated from the initial isolation plates. There was complete agreement in all the typable strains, 325 of the 350 colonies. Twenty-five strains were not typable due to roughness. It is considered that this reproducibility confirms the validity of using one colony for serotyping of urinary isolates.

Statistically there was no significant difference in the number of typable strains from specimens with high bacterial counts and specimens with low bacterial counts. Nor was there any difference in frequency of the typability of strains in patients with primary symptomatic infection compared with those with associated urinary tract abnormalities. There was a possibly significant increased frequency of typable strains in the primary infection compared with the recurrent infection. There was no significant difference in the frequency of specific serological groups in the high and low bacterial count groups. There was no statistical difference in the frequency of individual serological groups isolated from the two sexes.

Full text

PDF
428

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HELMHOLZ H. F., Sr Determination of the bacterial content of the urethra: a new method, with results of a study of 82 men. J Urol. 1950 Jul;64(1):158–166. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68615-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. RANTZ L. A. Serological grouping of Escherichia coli. Study in urinary tract infection. Arch Intern Med. 1962 Jan;109:37–42. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1962.03620130039006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. SHACKMAN R., MESSENT D. The effect of an indwelling catheter on the bacteriology of the male urethra and bladder. Br Med J. 1954 Oct 30;2(4845):1009–1012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4895.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. TURCK M., PETERSDORF R. G. The epidemiology of nonenteric Escherichia coli infections: prevalence of serological groups. J Clin Invest. 1962 Sep;41:1760–1765. doi: 10.1172/JCI104635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. UJVARY G. Uber die ätiologische Rolle der Escherichia-coli-Gruppe bei extraenteral lokalisierten Infektionen; biochemische und serologische Untersuchungen. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1958 Jan;170(6-7):394–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES