Abstract
There are some improvements in management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, induction-induced deaths still remain as a major problem. The aim of this study is to assess clinical parameters affecting early death in patients with AML. 199 AML patients, who were treated with intensive, non-intensive or supportive treatment between 2002 and 2014 in Hacettepe Hematology Department, were analyzed retrospectively. In our study early death rate for elderly was found to be lower than previous reports whereas it was similar for those who were under age of 60. Better ECOG performance (ECOG performance score 0 and 1) and non-intensive treatment associated with lower early death rates, however APL-type disease associated with higher early death rates. ECOG performance score at diagnosis was found to be the most related independent factor with higher rate of early death in 15 days after treatment (P<0.001). Therefore we decided to understand the factors which were related with ECOG. WBC count at diagnosis was found to be the only related parameter with ECOG performance score. Leucocyte count at diagnosis appears like to have an indirect effect on early death in AML patients. It maybe suggested that in recent years there is an improvement in early death rates of elderly AML patients. The currently reported findings require prospective validation and would encourage the incorporation of other next generation genomics for the prediction of early death and overall risk status of AML.
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia, early death
Introduction
There are some improvements in management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, induction-induced deaths still remain as a major problem. Many efforts have been spent to understand the predictors of early mortality however this issue is still unclear [1]. Minimal residual disease (MRD) level after induction therapy could be associated with the risk of relapse and survival [2]. The cost, availability, standardization, and validation represent a great problem for MRD. Thus, clinical routine parameters retain at the cornerstone in the therapeutic stratification of AML. However, using simple clinical parameters such as ‘age’ as primary basis for assignment of intensive, curative intent treatment in AML is also challenging [3]. The aim of this study is to assess clinical parameters affecting early death in patients with AML. Identification of the frequency, clinical features and possible risk factors for early mortality trends in AML is extremely important for the determination of overall management strategies of the disease course.
Materials and methods
199 AML patients, who were treated with intensive, non-intensive or supportive treatment between 2002 and 2014 in Hacettepe Hematology Department, were analyzed retrospectively. They had been prospectively recorded during clinical follow-up. All of the studied patients with AML had received their induction/re-induction chemotherapy protocols and other diagnostic/therapeutic standard clinical interventions when there is an absolute clinical indication. Meanwhile, all of the ethical considerations had been strictly followed in accordance with the Helsinki declaration. As a standard care/action of the hospitals of the Hacettepe Medical School, it has been recognized from the patient records that all of the studied patients had given informed consents at the time of hospitalization and before the administration of chemotherapy and other relevant diagnostic/therapeutic standard of care. Parameters of age, gender, type of disease, primary or secondary disease, type of treatment, Charlson comorbidity score, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ECOG, white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin and platelet levels, European LeukemiaNet (ELN) cytogenetic category were noted. We analyzed the parameters effecting early exitus. Early exitus defined as the death within first 15 days after the initial therapy since we targeted to exclude the effect of achieving complete remission in prognosis.
Statistical analyses
Categorical and continuous data were compared by the Chi-square (or Fisher’s Exact test if required by sample size) and Independent-samples T-test, respectively. Bivariate correlation analysis for categorical variables was done by Spearman’s correlation analysis. Univariate comparisons with a P value <0.1 were included in multivariate analyses in which statistical significance threshold was accepted as P<0.05. Logistic regression analysis was used to study simultaneous effect of selected variables. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences v17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) software was used for statistical analyses.
Results
A total of 199 AML cases were analyzed. The demographic data of participants are given in Table 1. 23, 31 and 43 cases died within 15, 21 and 30 days after treatment, respectively. When we analyzed the treatment choices 112, none and 2 of the patients aged <60 had been treated with intensive, non-intensive and supportive treatments, respectively. On the other hand 55, 17, and 13 patients aged ≥60 were treated with intensive, non-intensive and supportive treatments, respectively. The difference between treatment choices according to age category was highly statistically significant (P<0.001) (Table 2). In order to neutralize the effect of achieving CR/PR, we decided to evaluate the factors effecting early death in 15 days after initiation of treatment. In this study we found an early death rate of 13.06% in 15 days after the initiation of treatment. In the patients who were under age of 60, the early death rate was 10.67% (11 dead versus 103 alive) whereas early death rate was 16.43% (12 dead versus 73 alive) for patients who were ages of 60 or above. If only patients who were given intensive treatment were considered, the early death rates were 8.73% (9 dead versus 103 alive) and 10% (5 dead versus 50 alive) for patients under age of 60 and 60 or above, respectively. The relationship between age, gender, treatment type (intensive treatment yes/no), WBC, hemoglobin, platelet and LDH levels at diagnosis, ECOG performance score, ELN cytogenetic analysis, Charlson comorbidity score, disease type (APL/non-APL/secondary), with early exitus in first 15 days was evaluated (Table 3). After univariate analysis, among the factors that had P value <0.1, were taken to multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, ECOG performance score at diagnosis was found to be the most related independent factor with higher rate of early death in 15 days after treatment (P<0.001) (Table 4). Therefore we decided to understand the factors which were related with ECOG (Table 5). After univariate analysis, among the factors that had P value <0.1, were taken to multivariate analysis. WBC count at diagnosis was found to be the only related parameter with ECOG performance score (Table 6).
Table 1.
Parameters | Patients with early ex in 15 days (N: 23) | Patients without early ex in 15 days (N: 176) |
---|---|---|
Age (Median, Range) | 63 (17-85) | 53 (16-86) |
Gender (F/M) | 11/12 | 69/107 |
Type of Disease (APL/non-APL/secondary to MDS/treatment-related) | 6/15/2/0 | 19/130/23/4 |
Treatment type (Intensive treatment/non-intensive treatment/supportive treatment) | 14/4/5 | 153/13/10 |
ECOG score (0/1/2/3/4) | 0/4/7/4/8 | 35/99/20/12/10 |
ELN cytogenetic category (Favorable/non-favorable/unknown) | 7/4/12 | 75/43/58 |
Charlson Index (2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10) | 7/2/6/1/4/3/0/0/0 | 67/28/26/31/10/8/2/3/1 |
Hemoglobin at diagnosis (mg/dl) (median, range) | 8 (4-13) | 9 (4-16) |
WBC at diagnosis (median, range) | 68.1×103/µl (0.9-200×103/µl) | 8.8×103/µl (0.6-300×103/µl) |
Platelet at diagnosis (median, range) | 30×103/µl (5-478×103/µl) | 41×103/µl (4-400×103/µl) |
LDH at diagnosis (U/L) | 1059 (370-3000) | 504.5 (160-16170) |
Table 2.
Intensive treatment Yes (n=167) | Intensive treatment No (n=32) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Patients with exitus in 15 days | 14 | 9 | 0.001 |
Patients without exitus in 15 days | 153 | 23 | |
Patients with exitus in 21 days | 22 | 9 | 0.033 |
Patients without exitus in 21 days | 145 | 23 | |
Patients with exitus in 30 days | 32 | 11 | 0.055 |
Patients without exitus in 30 days | 135 | 21 |
Note: Categorical data were compared by the Chi-square (or Fisher’s Exact test if required by sample size).
Table 3.
Parameters | Values | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Exitus Yes | Exitus No | ||
Age | 63 (17-85) | 53 (16-86) | 0.256 |
Gender (M/F) | 12/11 | 107/69 | 0.665 |
Hemoglobin at diagnosis (gr/dl) | 8 (4-13) | 9 (4-16) | 0.522 |
WBC at diagnosis (×103/µl) | 68.1 (0.9-200) | 8.8 (0.6-300) | 0.004 |
Platelet at diagnosis (×103/µl) | 30 (5-478) | 41 (4-400) | 0.754 |
LDH at diagnosis (U/L) | 1059 (370-3000) | 504 (160-16170) | 0.349 |
ECOG performance score (0/1/2/3/4) | 0/4/7/4/8 | 35/99/20/12/10 | <0.001 |
ELN cytogenetic analysis (Poor/Intermediate/Good/Unknown) | 2/2/7/12 | 16/27/75/58 | 0.322 |
Charlson Score 6 and above/lower than 6 | 7/16 | 24/152 | 0.038 |
APL/non-APL/secondary | 6/15/2 | 19/130/27 | 0.099 |
Treatment type (intensive treatment Y/N) | 9/14 | 23/153 | 0.001 |
Note: Categorical and continuous data were compared by the Chi-square (or Fisher’s Exact test if required by sample size) and Independent-samples T-test, respectively. Bivariate correlation analysis for categorical variables was done by Spearman’s correlation analysis.
Table 4.
Parameters | Beta value | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
WBC at diagnosis | 0.000 | 1.000 (1.000-1.000) | 0.271 |
ECOG performance score | 0.959 | 2.609 (1.708-3.985) | <0.001 |
Charlson Score below 6* | -0.734 | 0.480 (0.115-2.003) | 0.314 |
APL type AML** | 2.993 | 19.953 (1.972-201.910) | 0.011 |
Non-APL type AML** | 1.635 | 5.128 (0.705-37.294) | 0.106 |
Non-intensive treatment*** | 1.487 | 4.423 (1.106-17.686) | 0.036 |
Note: Univariate comparisons with a P value <0.1 were included in multivariate analyses in which statistical significance threshold was accepted as P<0.05. Logistic regression analysis was used to study simultaneous effect of selected variables.
Charlson Score 6 and above was the reference group.
Secondary type disease was the reference group.
Intensive treatment was the reference group.
Table 5.
Parameters | Values | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
ECOG 0-1 | ECOG 2-3-4 | ||
Age | 53 (16-86) | 60 (20-85) | 0.005 |
Gender (M/F) | 81/56 | 38/23 | 0.674 |
Hemoglobin at diagnosis (gr/dl) | 9 (4-16) | 8.1 (4-16) | 0.406 |
WBC at diagnosis (×103/µl) | 6.1 (0.6-300) | 20.1 (0.6-298) | 0.008 |
Platelet at diagnosis (×103/µl) | 42 (4-400) | 34 (5-478) | 0.783 |
LDH at diagnosis (U/L) | 446 (160-8490) | 922 (267-16170) | 0.027 |
ELN cytogenetic analysis (Poor/Intermediate/Good/Unknown) | 12/18/59/48 | 6/11/22/22 | 0.738 |
Charlson Score 6 and above/lower than 6 | 18/119 | 13/48 | 0.144 |
APL/non-APL/secondary | 17/105/15 | 7/40/14 | 0.087 |
Treatment type (intensive treatment Y/N) | 112/15 | 44/17 | 0.003 |
Note: Categorical and continuous data were compared by the Chi-square (or Fisher’s Exact test if required by sample size) and Independent-samples T-test, respectively. Bivariate correlation analysis for categorical variables was done by Spearman’s correlation analysis.
Table 6.
Parameter | Beta value | Odds ratio (confidence interval) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.012 | 1.012 (0.988-1.036) | 0.337 |
WBC at diagnosis | 0.000 | 1.000 (1.000-1.000) | 0.015 |
LDH at diagnosis | 0.000 | 1.000 (1000-1001) | 0.114 |
Non-Intensive Treatment* | 0.686 | 1.986 (0.761-5.183) | 0.161 |
APL type AML** | -0.136 | 0.873 (0.188-4.047) | 0.862 |
Non-APL type AML** | -0.651 | 0.522 (0.198-1.376) | 0.189 |
Note: Univariate comparisons with a P value <0.1 were included in multivariate analyses in which statistical significance threshold was accepted as P<0.05. Logistic regression analysis was used to study simultaneous effect of selected variables.
Intensive treatment was the reference group.
Secondary type disease was the reference group.
Discussion
Early death rate is still needs to be improved in management of acute myeloid leukemia. In literature, death rates related with intensive therapy in AML were reported as 5-10% and 25% for patients under age of 60 and 60 or above, respectively [4,5]. In our study early death rate for elderly was found to be lower than previous reports whereas it was similar for those who were under age of 60. This result may suggest that in recent years there is an improvement in early death rates of elderly AML patients. Baseline ECOG performance score along with APL-type disease and non-intensive treatment were independently associated with early death. Better ECOG performance (ECOG performance score 0 and 1) and non-intensive treatment associated with lower early death rates, however APL-type disease associated with higher early death rates. The main causes of early death in leukemias are usually hemorrhage, often associated with hyperleukocytosis and infection [6]. The management strategies for leukemia patients with hyperleukocytosis prone to early death include optimization of coagulation, hyperhydration, urate oxidase administration and avoidance of packed red blood cell transfusions which may increase blood viscosity. Nevertheless, early mortality in this leukemic subpopulation is not influenced by universal or selected use of leukapheresis or hydroxyurea/low-dose chemotherapy [7]. In the English literature, there are many studies that advert to early death rates. It is known that intensive chemotherapy is not suitable for elderly and these patients die early as a consequence of extra toxicity [8,9]. A study conducted in USA, reported that age and performance status were the most important predictors of treatment related mortality within 28 days after initiation of intensive induction chemotherapy [3]. Also another study which was conducted with eighty-five patients with AML presenting with hyperleukocytosis revealed early death was more frequent in older patients [10]. However in our study age was not found as a predictor. Probably this was due to the fact that older patients, especially less fit cases were deliberately not treated with intensive protocols. In the past decade many predictive models developed in order to classify elder patients unfitted for intensive chemotherapy [9,11-15]. A recent study conducted with 9380 patients with AML who were aged ≤65 years and were diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy between 1973 and 2010 revealed that although age was found to significantly influence the 1-month mortality for the period between 1973 and 1977, this difference in 1-month mortality were no longer significant among patients with AML who were treated more recently [16]. The results of this study and our study together may indicate that in recent years there is an improvement in the management of AML patients especially in decision-making for intensive treatment. In some studies co-morbidity index was found to be related with early death. For example, a study conducted in Serbia with 145 acute myeloid patients reported that for early death the most significant predictor was co-morbidity, as scored by the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Co-morbidity Index (HCT-CI) [17]. Another study conducted with 177 patients over 60 years of age receiving acute myeloid leukemia induction therapy also reported that the hematopoietic cell transplantation co-morbidity index was predictive of early death rates [18]. However in our study we did not find Charlson co-morbidity score as a predictor for early death. Probably, HCT-CI is a better tool than the Charlson score for this aim. In our study, the ECOG performance score was the most important independent factor affecting early death. This effect of ECOG score is regardless of age. So it may be interpreted that performance of patients is not always parallel with age, elder patients may have fair performance. As we found age did not affect the early death rates whereas ECOG did; our results coherent with tendency of doctors who are currently more likely to consider elderly patients on an individual basis, and to consider physiological age, rather than chronological age in making choices about patients. After understanding that the ECOG performance score was the most important factor, we aimed to reveal the parameters associated with it. WBC at diagnosis was found to have a strong independent association with ECOG performance score. Therefore the WBC at diagnosis seems to have an indirect effect on early death in AML patients. There could be many still unknown factors effecting early death rates. An interesting study from Japan conducted in 193 de novo non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia patients proposed that the null genotype of glutathione S-transferase-T1 might play a role in increased early death after chemotherapy [19]. Therefore, it can be concluded that studies also including molecular and genetic factors should be performed in order to clarify the predictors for early death rate. Since the potential differences and heterogeneity in the AML patient populations and lots of conflicting data available, the predictive role and integrity of numerous important clinical parameters in the leukemic patients still need further improvement. The currently reported findings require prospective validation and would encourage the incorporation of other next generation genomics for the prediction of early death and overall risk status of AML. Stratification of the AML patients for current therapy protocols needs reasonable objective scoring systems that would be developed by future clinicobiological investigations.
In conclusion, in this study we found that in recent years there is likely to be an improvement in early death rates of elderly AML patients. Also, ECOG performance score was the most important factor affecting early death in 15 days after treatment and leucocyte count at diagnosis was found to have a strong relationship with ECOG performance score. For that reason, leucocyte count at diagnosis appears like to have an indirect effect on early death in AML patients.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Chang MC, Chen TY, Tang JL, Lan YJ, Chao TY, Chiu CF, Ho HT. Leukapheresis and cranial irradiation in patients with hyperleukocytic acute myeloid leukemia: no impact on early mortality and intracranial hemorrhage. Am J Hematol. 2007;82:976–80. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen X, Xie H, Wood BL, Walter RB, Pagel JM, Becker PS, Sandhu VK, Abkowitz JL, Appelbaum FR, Estey EH. Relation of Clinical Response and Minimal Residual Disease and Their Prognostic Impact on Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:1258–64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walter RB, Othus M, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Cortes JE, Pierce SA, Appelbaum FR, Kantarjian HA, Estey EH. Prediction of early death after induction therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with pretreatment risk scores: a novel paradigm for treatment assignment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:4417–23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.7525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mayer RJ, Sea DR. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. New Engl J Med. 1994;331:896–903. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410063311402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rees JK, Gray RG. Principal results of the medical research council’s 8th acute myeloid leukemia trial. Lancet. 1986;2:1236–1241. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92674-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Slats AM, Egeler RM, van der Does-van den Berg A, Korbijn C, Hählen K, Kamps WA, Veerman AJ, Zwaan CM. Causes of death-other than progressive leukemia--in childhood acute lymphoblastic (ALL) and myeloid leukemia (AML): the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group experience. Leukemia. 2005;19:537–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oberoi S, Lehrnbecher T, Phillips B, Hitzler J, Ethier MC, Beyene J, Sung L. Leukapheresis and low-dose chemotherapy do not reduce early mortality in acute myeloid leukemia hyperleukocytosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leuk Res. 2014;38:460–8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, Godwin JE, Anderson JE, Petersdorf SH. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:3481–3485. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, O’Brien S, Cortes J, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G, Jabbour E, Wierda W, Kadia T, Pierce S, Shan J, Keating M, Freireich EJ. Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2010;116:4422–4429. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ventura GJ, Hester JP, Smith TL, Keating MJ. Acute myeloblastic leukemia with hyperleukocytosis: risk factors for early mortality in induction. Am J Hematol. 1988;27:34–7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830270109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Giles FJ, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Verstovsek S, Thomas D, Wierda W, Ferrajoli A, Kornblau S, Pierce S, Albitar M, Cortes J, Kantarjian H. The haematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index score is predictive of early death and survival in patients over 60 years of age receiving induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2007;136:624–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kantarjian H, O’brien S, Cortes J, Giles F, Faderl S, Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G, Wierda W, Pierce S, Shan J, Estey E. Results of intensive chemotherapy in 998 patients age 65 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Predictive prognostic models for outcome. Cancer. 2006;106:1090–1098. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malfuson JV, Etienne A, Turlure P, de Revel T, Thomas X, Contentin N, Terré C, Rigaudeau S, Bordessoule D, Vey N, Gardin C, Dombret H Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Risk factors and decision criteria for intensive chemotherapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2008;93:1806–1813. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wheatley K, Brookes CL, Howman AJ, Goldstone AH, Milligan DW, Prentice AG, Moorman AV, Burnett AK United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Subgroup. Prognostic factor analysis of the survival of elderly patients with AML in the MRC AML11 and LRF AML14 trials. Br J Haematol. 2009;145:598–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krug U, Röllig C, Koschmieder A, Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Schaich M, Thiede C, Kramer M, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Haferlach T, Haferlach C, Koschmieder S, Rohde C, Serve H, Wörmann B, Hiddemann W, Ehninger G, Berdel WE, Büchner T, Müller-Tidow C German Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Cooperative Group; Study Alliance Leukemia Investigators. Complete remission and early death after intensive chemotherapy in patients aged 60 years or older with acute myeloid leukaemia: A web-based application for prediction of outcomes. Lancet. 2010;376:2000–2008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Percival ME, Tao L, Medeiros BC, Clarke CA. Improvements in the early death rate among 9380 patients with acute myeloid leukemia after initial therapy: A SEER database analysis. Cancer. 2015;121:2004–12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Djunic I, Virijevic M, Novkovic A, Djurasinovic V, Colovic N, Vidovic A, Suvajdzic-Vukovic N, Tomin D. Pretreatment risk factors and importance of comorbidity for overall survival, complete remission, and early death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology. 2012;17:53–8. doi: 10.1179/102453312X13221316477651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Giles FJ, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Verstovsek S, Thomas D, Wierda W, Ferrajoli A, Kornblau S, Pierce S, Albitar M, Cortes J, Kantarjian H. The haematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index score is predictive of early death and survival in patients over 60 years of age receiving induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2007;136:624–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Naoe T, Tagawa Y, Kiyoi H, Kodera Y, Miyawaki S, Asou N, Kuriyama K, Kusumoto S, Shimazaki C, Saito K, Akiyama H, Motoji T, Nishimura M, Shinagawa K, Ueda R, Saito H, Ohno R. Prognostic significance of the null genotype of glutathione S-transferase-T1 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: increased early death after chemotherapy. Leukemia. 2002;16:203–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]