Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1996 Feb;51(2):175–178. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.2.175

Effect of altitude on spirometric parameters and the performance of peak flow meters.

A J Pollard 1, N P Mason 1, P W Barry 1, R C Pollard 1, D J Collier 1, R S Fraser 1, M R Miller 1, J S Milledge 1
PMCID: PMC473030  PMID: 8711651

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Portable peak flow meters are used in clinical practice for measurement of peak expiratory flow (PEF) at many different altitudes throughout the world. Some PEF meters are affected by gas density. This study was undertaken to establish which type of meter is best for use above sea level and to determine changes in spirometric measurements at altitude. METHODS: The variable orifice mini-Wright peak flow meter was compared with the fixed orifice Micro Medical Microplus turbine microspirometer at sea level and at Everest Base Camp (5300 m). Fifty one members of the 1994 British Mount Everest Medical Expedition were studied (age range, 19-55). RESULTS: Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) fell by 5% and PEF rose by 25.5%. However, PEF recorded with the mini-Wright peak flow meter underestimated PEF by 31%, giving readings 6.6% below sea level values. FVC was lowest in the mornings and did not improve significantly with acclimatisation. Lower PEF values were observed on morning readings and were associated with higher acute mountain sickness scores, although the latter may reflect decreased effort in those with acute mountain sickness. There was no change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at altitude when measured with the turbine microspirometer. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of the fall in FVC at 5300 m is unknown but may be attributed to changes in lung blood volume, interstitial lung oedema, or early airways closure. Variable orifice peak flow meters grossly underestimate PEF at altitude and fixed orifice devices are therefore preferable where accurate PEF measurements are required above sea level.

Full text

PDF
175

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cochrane G. M., Prieto F., Clark T. J. Intrasubject variability of maximal expiratory flow volume curve. Thorax. 1977 Apr;32(2):171–176. doi: 10.1136/thx.32.2.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DOYLE J. T., WILSON J. S., WARREN J. V. The pulmonary vascular responses to short-term hypoxia in human subjects. Circulation. 1952 Feb;5(2):263–270. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.5.2.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forster P., Parker R. W. Peak expiratory flow rate at high altitude. Lancet. 1983 Jul 9;2(8341):100–100. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90078-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Maron M. B., Hamilton L. H., Maksud M. G. Alterations in pulmonary function consequent to competitive marathon running. Med Sci Sports. 1979 Fall;11(3):244–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Massen H., Boissinot E., Moline J. Mesure du débit de pointe et altitude. Cah Anesthesiol. 1986 Jun-Jul;34(4):341–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller M. R., Dickinson S. A., Hitchings D. J. The accuracy of portable peak flow meters. Thorax. 1992 Nov;47(11):904–909. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.11.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. OTIS A. B., BEMBOWER W. C. Effect of gas density on resistance to respiratory gas flow in man. J Appl Physiol. 1949 Dec;2(6):300–306. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1949.2.6.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pedersen O. F., Miller M. R., Sigsgaard T., Tidley M., Harding R. M. Portable peak flow meters: physical characteristics, influence of temperature, altitude, and humidity. Eur Respir J. 1994 May;7(5):991–997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. RAHN H., HAMMOND D. Vital capacity at reduced barometric pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1952 Mar;4(9):715–724. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1952.4.9.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shields J. L., Hannon J. P., Harris C. W., Platner W. S. Effects of altitude acclimatization on pulmonary function in women. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Nov;25(5):606–609. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1968.25.5.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Singh I., Khanna P. K., Srivastava M. C., Lal M., Roy S. B., Subramanyam C. S. Acute mountain sickness. N Engl J Med. 1969 Jan 23;280(4):175–184. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196901232800402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stockley R. A., Green I. D. Birmingham Medical Research Expeditionary Society 1977 Expedition: cardiopulmonary function before, during and after a twenty-one-day Himalayan trek. Postgrad Med J. 1979 Jul;55(645):496–501. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.55.645.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thomas P. S., Harding R. M., Milledge J. S. Peak expiratory flow at altitude. Thorax. 1990 Aug;45(8):620–622. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.8.620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ULVEDAL F., MORGAN T. E., Jr, CUTLER R. G., WELCH B. E. VENTILATORY CAPACITY DURING PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO SIMULATED ALTITUDE WITHOUT HYPOXIA. J Appl Physiol. 1963 Sep;18:904–908. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1963.18.5.904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Welsh C. H., Wagner P. D., Reeves J. T., Lynch D., Cink T. M., Armstrong J., Malconian M. K., Rock P. B., Houston C. S. Operation Everest. II: Spirometric and radiographic changes in acclimatized humans at simulated high altitudes. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 May;147(5):1239–1244. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES