Abstract
To model the (His)7Cu4Sn (n = 1 or 2) active sites of nitrous oxide reductase, the first Cu4(μ4-S) cluster supported only by nitrogen donors has been prepared using amidinate supporting ligands. Structural, magnetic, spectroscopic, and computational characterization is reported. Electrochemical data indicates that the 2-hole model complex can be reduced reversibly to the 1-hole state and irreversibly to the fully reduced state.
Nitrous oxide reductase (N2OR) is a copper-dependent enzyme that converts environmentally harmful nitrous oxide into benign dinitrogen and water during bacterial denitrification.1 Two forms of the N2O-reducing active site of N2OR have been characterized crystallographically (Figure 1a). Both feature Cu4(μ4-S) cores supported by seven histidine N-donors; the CuZ* form features a hydroxide/water ligand along one edge of the tetracopper cluster,2,3 while the CuZ form instead features a second sulphide ligand along that edge.4 The CuZ* site has a “1-hole” CuI3CuII resting state and activates N2O rapidly in the “fully reduced” CuI4 state, while the CuZ site has a “2-hole” CuI2CuII2 resting state and activates N2O slowly in its “1-hole” state.5 The electronic structure descriptions and chemical mechanisms related to these active sites remain elusive, motivating model studies.
Figure 1.
(a) Structures of the CuZ* and CuZ active sites of nitrous oxide reductase; (b) a representative Cu3S2 model complex with nitrogen ligands; (c) previously reported Cu4(μ4-S) model complexes with phosphorous ligands; (d) the Cu4(μ4-S) model complex reported in this work.
Much of the available knowledge regarding copper sulphide clusters comes from studies of Cu2S26 and Cu3S27,8 model complexes, which feature bridging ligands with significant S-S interactions,9 supported by nitrogen chelates. The latter category of complexes (Figure 1b), in particular, has been the subject of extensive experimental and computational characterization as well as fascinating literature discussions.9–11 However, none of these complexes truly model the unusual μ4-S bridge of N2OR or provide insight into reduced catalytic intermediates. Phosphine12,13 ligands have been used to stabilize “fully reduced” Cu4(μ4-S) and Cu3(μ3-S) clusters more structurally faithful to N2OR (Figure 1c), but the inability thus far of these systems to access open-shell oxidation states has precluded experimental determination of electron structure using typical methods of physical inorganic chemistry.14 In this regard, a recent report of strained Cu3(μ3-S) clusters encapsulated within a tris(β-diketinimate) cyclophane cage was a noteworthy advance.15 In this communication, we report the first Cu4(μ4-S) cluster supported only by nitrogen ligands (Figure 1d) and disclose its structural, magnetic, and spectroscopic characterization. This system will provide an entry point for electronic structure determination and chemical reactivity studies for a tetracopper sulphide environment that is, arguably, the most relevant model for N2OR identified to date.
Inspired by a recent study of copper amidinate clusters assembled using carbon disulphide,16 we sought to study copper sulphide chemistry using the amidinate ligand, [(2,4,6-Me3C6H2N)2CH]− (abbreviated NCN− here). Addition of the neutral sulphur atom donors S8 or Ph3SbS to the dicopper(I) precursor (NCN)2Cu2 resulted in a dramatic colour change from colourless to dark purple. While this purple product (1) formed in low yields due to its instability in solution as well as the formation of several side products, we were able to isolate 1 in yields of 34–43%. Elemental analysis data for this material was consistent with a (NCN)4Cu4S stoichiometry, and this assignment was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Complex 1 crystallizes in the P4̄3n space group. The crystal symmetry coincides with the local symmetry of the NCN− ligand shell, which is highly ordered about the crystallographic 4̄ through possible stabilization from π-stacking interactions (Figure 2). (This structure is apparently rigid in solution as evidenced by NMR spectroscopy, where six distinct mesityl methyl resonances were resolved, indicating restricted N-Caryl bond rotation as well as static pseudo-S4 symmetry in solution that distinguishes the “upwards” NCN− ligands from the “downwards” NCN− ligands. See Figures S5, S6 and S16.) However, the crystal symmetry results in two alternative positions for the Cu4S core that apparently has lower internal symmetry (Figure S15).
Figure 2.
X-ray structure of 1, with only one of two disordered Cu4S components shown. Mesityl groups are shown as wireframes, other atoms are shown as 50%-probability thermal ellipsoids, and hydrogen atoms have been omitted. Colour scheme: C, grey; Cu, brown; N, blue; S, yellow.
The exact assignment of alternative Cu and S positions to one or another component of the crystallographic disorder was done by analysing Cu-Cu and Cu-S separations from the point of view of structurally meaningful values. This assignment was confirmed by DFT calculations. Spin-unrestricted and symmetry-unrestricted DFT calculations at the BVP86/LANL2TZ(f) level of theory were conducted for both singlet and triplet spin states using a model where the N-mesityl groups were changed to N-methyl groups (1-Me). The singlet state for 1-Me was calculated to be lower in energy than the triplet state (by 10.2 kcal/mol, although more advanced calculations would be needed to accurately estimate the singlet-triplet gap). The optimized structure of the singlet state has C2V symmetry and is characterized by an alternating short-long-short-long pattern of Cu-Cu distances within the Cu4 rectangle, with short Cu-Cu distances of 2.45 Å and long Cu-Cu distances of 2.79 Å. It is tempting, based on these bond distances, to view the 1-Me structure as consisting of two separate [Cu1.5Cu1.5] units that are antiferromagnetically coupled to each other, giving rise to the singlet ground state. However, the two optimized structures were found to have stable wavefunctions with respect to internal magnetic coupling, and the α and β molecular orbitals for the singlet state were degenerate and identical in nature. Collectively, these observations indicate that 1-Me is best described at this time as having a closed-shell singlet ground state rather than a singlet state arising from magnetic coupling, at this level of theory.
Only one Cu4S set can be identified from the disordered crystal structure of 1 that matches the topology and key structural features of optimized singlet 1-Me. The resulting structure (Figure 2) for 1 possesses near-perfect C2V symmetry and replicates the calculated bond length alternation in the Cu4 rectangle of 1-Me, with experimentally determined short Cu-Cu distances of 2.4226(6) Å and long Cu-Cu distances of 3.0353(6) Å. Within this component, the two sets of Cu-S distances are 2.1812(6) Å and 2.1790(6) Å. The geometry at sulphur is characterized by a τ4 value17 of 0.76, similar to the τ4 values for the μ4-S ligands in CuZ* (0.66) and CuZ (0.71).
The formal oxidation state assignment for 1 is CuI2CuII2, making it a model for the “2-hole” state of the N2OR active site. The 2-hole CuZ is also a singlet ground state.1 The purple colour of 1 comes from two overlapping absorbance peaks (Figure 3): a main peak centred at 561 nm (ε ≈ 14000 M−1cm−1) and a shoulder at approximately 470 nm. For comparison, the 2-hole CuZ absorbs at 540 nm and the 1-hole CuZ* absorbs at 680 nm.5 To our knowledge, the 2-hole CuZ* has not been characterized.
Figure 3.
Absorbance spectrum of 1 (0.06 mM solution in CH2Cl2).
The accumulated experimental data is consistent with 1 possessing a singlet ground state with a low-energy triplet excited state. The 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra for 1 resemble those for a typical diamagnetic species, with chemical shifts occurring in their normal regions. However, complex 1 exhibits a measurable magnetic moment in solution that increases with increasing temperature (μeff = 2.3–2.9 μB over the temperature range 221–298 K; see Figure S1). In addition, a frozen glass containing 1 was found to be EPR active. The observed EPR spectrum seems typical for a monomeric S = 1/2 cupric species with splitting from one Cu and two equivalent N centres (g|| = 2.134, A||(Cu) = 185 G, A||(N) = 15 G; see Figure S18a–b). Notably, the intensity of the EPR signal was found to increase by a factor of 2.5 as the temperature was increased from 115 K to 130 K. Upon decreasing the temperature from 130 K to 112 K, the signal intensity decreased, indicating that the temperature dependence is reversible. For a typical S = 1/2 signal, the Curie Law predicts that the signal intensity should decrease by a factor of 115/130 = 0.88 when warmed from 115 K to 130 K, as we confirmed by analysing Cu(acac)2 as an authentic S = 1/2 control sample (Figure S18c). The increase in signal intensity with increasing temperature could be a further indication that a paramagnetic excited state is being thermally populated. While it is not clear how the observed EPR signal fits the magnetic properties of 1, the reversible temperature dependence is unusual. Even if after further studies the S = 1/2 turns out to derive from a trace paramagnetic byproduct or decomposition material, or even from a temperature-dependent comproportionation equilibrium, the magnetic properties for the S = 1/2 complex are novel and warrant further explanation, which is beyond the scope of this investigation. It is worth noting that there is precedent for dicopper sites with EPR spectra resembling monomeric cupric species.18–21
The cyclic voltammetry of 1 was examined in both CH2Cl2, which provides access to more oxidizing potentials, and THF, which provides access to more reducing potentials. In CH2Cl2 (Figure 4a), the cyclic voltammogram (CV) of 1 featured a reversible wave centred at −1.28 V vs Fc+/Fc (Fc = ferrocene), which is assigned as the 1/[1]− couple, as well as two quasi-reversible waves at +0.51 and approximately +0.92 V vs Fc+/Fc. These oxidative events are assigned as ligand-based oxidations for two reasons. First, nearly identical signatures were found in the CV of the (NCN)2Cu2 precursor (Figure S11). Second, a closely related amidinate-supported dicopper system is known to engage in predominantly ligand-based redox chemistry at similar potentials.22 In THF (Figure 4b), the 1/[1]− couple was observed at −1.25 V vs Fc+/Fc, and an additional irreversible reduction to [1]2− was observed with onset at approximately −2.36 V vs Fc+/Fc. Collectively, the CV data indicates that (a) oxidation of 1 occurs from the NCN− ligands, (b) the formally CuI3CuII “1-hole” species also is stabilized in this system, and (c) further ligand modification is needed to stabilize the formally CuI4 “fully reduced” oxidation state that would model the active form of CuZ*.
Figure 4.

Cyclic voltammograms of 1 with 0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] electrolyte in (a) CH2Cl2 and (b) THF.
Lastly, information about the frontier orbitals can be obtained from the calculated DFT structure of 1-Me and is largely consistent with the collected experimental data. The calculated 1-Me HOMO (Figure 5a), which models the source of electrons during oxidation of 1, is mostly based on two of the NCN− ligands, with MO populations of 60% total N 2p (15% each), 7% S 3p, and and 16% total Cu 3d (4% each). The calculated 1-Me LUMO (Figure 5b), which models the destination of electrons during reduction of 1 to the 1-hole and fully reduced states, is mostly based on the covalent Cu4(μ4-S) core, with MO populations of 21% S 3p, 48% total Cu 3d (12% each), and 12% total N 2p (3% each).
Figure 5.
Calculated (a) HOMO and (b) LUMO for 1-Me (0.04 isovalue).
In conclusion, this report discloses the synthesis and thorough characterization of copper sulphide cluster 1, which represents the most relevant model for the active sites of N2OR to date from the perspective of featuring a Cu4(μ4-S) core supported only by nitrogen ligands. While structurally similar to the CuZ* site, model 1 possesses redox chemistry reminiscent of the more electron-rich CuZ site, presumably due to the presence of anionic amidinate ligands in place of neutral histidine donors. On-going efforts in our laboratory involve accessing reduced oxidation states of 1 for more thorough electronic structure measurements and chemical reactivity studies.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Start-up funds to N.P.M. were provided by the UIC Department of Chemistry. EPR facilities are supported by the National Biomedical EPR Center Grant EB001980 from NIH. The authors are grateful to members of the Mankad group for verifying reproducibility of the synthetic procedures.
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental and computational methods, spectral and crystallographic data, computational output. CCDC deposition number for 1: CCDC 1405092. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Notes and references
- 1.Pauleta SR, Dell’Acqua S, Moura I. Coord Chem Rev. 2013;257:332–349. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brown K, Tegoni M, Prudêncio M, Pereira AS, Besson S, Moura JJ, Moura I, Cambillau C. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:191–195. doi: 10.1038/73288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rasmussen T, Berks BC, Sanders-Loehr J, Dooley DM, Zumft WG, Thomson AJ. Biochemistry. 2000;39:12753–12756. doi: 10.1021/bi001811i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pomowski A, Zumft WG, Kroneck PMH, Einsle O. Nature. 2011;477:234–237. doi: 10.1038/nature10332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnston EM, Dell’Acqua S, Ramos S, Pauleta SR, Moura I, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;136:614–617. doi: 10.1021/ja411500p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sarangi R, York JT, Helton ME, Fujisawa K, Karlin KD, Tolman WB, Hodgson KO, Hedman B, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:676–686. doi: 10.1021/ja0762745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown EC, York JT, Antholine WE, Ruiz E, Alvarez S, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:13752–13753. doi: 10.1021/ja053971t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bar-Nahum I, Gupta AK, Huber SM, Ertem MZ, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2812–2814. doi: 10.1021/ja808917k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarangi R, Yang L, Winikoff SG, Gagliardi L, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:17180–17191. doi: 10.1021/ja111323m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Berry JF. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:2719–2724. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alvarez S, Hoffmann R, Mealli C. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:8358–8373. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yam VWW, Lee WK, Lai TF. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1993;1571 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Johnson BJ, Lindeman SV, Mankad NP. Inorg Chem. 2014;53:10611–10619. doi: 10.1021/ic501720h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.York JT, Bar-Nahum I, Tolman WB. Inorg Chim Acta. 2008;361:885–893. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2007.06.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Di Francesco GN, Gaillard A, Ghiviriga I, Abboud KA, Murray LJ. Inorg Chem. 2014;53:4647–4654. doi: 10.1021/ic500333p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lane AC, Vollmer MV, Laber CH, Melgarejo DY, Chiarella GM, Fackler JP, Jr, Yang X, Baker GA, Walensky JR. Inorg Chem. 2014;53:11357–11366. doi: 10.1021/ic501694d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang L, Powell DR, Houser RP. Dalton Trans. 2007:955. doi: 10.1039/b617136b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xie X, Gorelsky SI, Sarangi R, Garner DK, Hwang HJ, Hodgson KO, Hedman B, Lu Y, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:5194–5205. doi: 10.1021/ja7102668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li L, Murthy NN, Telser J, Zakharov LN, Yap GPA, Rheingold AL, Karlin KD, Rokita SE. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:7144–7159. doi: 10.1021/ic0605930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Culpepper MA, Cutsail GE, III, Hoffman BM, Rosenzweig AC. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:7640–7643. doi: 10.1021/ja302195p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Smith SM, Rawat S, Telser J, Hoffman BM, Stemmler TL, Rosenzweig AC. Biochemistry. 2011;50:10231–10240. doi: 10.1021/bi200801z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jiang X, Bollinger JC, Baik M-H, Lee D. Chem Commun. 2005;1043 doi: 10.1039/b412152j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




