Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
letter
. 2015 Dec 1;192(11):1399. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1533LE

Risk-based Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Trials and Implications for Surveillance of Clinical Effectiveness Using Regression Discontinuity Designs

Allan J Walkey 1, Jacob Bor 2
PMCID: PMC4731705  PMID: 26623693

To the Editor:

The Perspective by Iwashyna and colleagues highlights the importance of stratifying clinical trial participants by level of risk to assess effect heterogeneity (1). By comparing efficacy across values of a risk score, an “efficacy threshold” can be identified at which patients could be provided (or not provided) the intervention. A critical question, however, is how to assess the real-world effectiveness of an efficacy threshold identified in such a trial. The quasiexperimental regression discontinuity offers an approach to evaluate real-world effectiveness of interventions found efficacious in subgroups of trial participants. Regression discontinuity analysis leverages situations in which interventions are instituted at a threshold of a continuously measured variable (24). Noise in measurements of that assignment variable quasirandomly assigns patients to be above or below the threshold and thus to intervention or control. An efficacy threshold that was previously identified in a trial designed according to Iwashyna and colleagues’ specifications could be later tested for effectiveness in real-world settings—and across different patient populations and care delivery systems. Investigators could use observational regression discontinuity methods for active surveillance of effectiveness by evaluating changes in the relationship between predicted risk and observed outcomes at the risk threshold for efficacy suggested by a trial. Health care systems may further use regression discontinuity analyses to explore whether risk thresholds identified in clinical trials optimally identify thresholds of efficacy among their patient populations, allowing titration of optimal risk cutoffs at individual hospitals. We encourage further investigation of methods to pair risk-based analysis for heterogeneity of treatment effects in clinical trials with post-trial, continuous surveillance and optimization of real-world effectiveness through quasiexperimental approaches.

Footnotes

Supported by National Institutes of Health/NHLBI grant K01 HL116768 (A.J.W.).

Author disclosures are available with the text of this letter at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Iwashyna TJ, Burke JF, Sussman JB, Prescott HC, Hayward RA, Angus DC. Implications of heterogeneity of treatment effect for reporting and analysis of randomized trials in critical care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:1045–1051. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201411-2125CP. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bor J, Moscoe E, Bärnighausen T. Three approaches to causal inference in regression discontinuity designs. Epidemiology. 2015;26:e28–e30, discussion e30. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bor J, Moscoe E, Mutevedzi P, Newell ML, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs in epidemiology: causal inference without randomized trials. Epidemiology. 2014;25:729–737. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moscoe E, Bor J, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:122–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES