Skip to main content
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery logoLink to Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
. 2016 Jan-Mar;11(1):8–14. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.165782

Supratentorial haemangioblastoma without von Hippel–Lindau syndrome in an adult: A rare tumor with review of literature

Sharad Pandey 1,, Vivek Sharma 1, Deepa Pandey 1, Vikul Kumar 1, Mohan Kumar 2
PMCID: PMC4732265  PMID: 26889272

Abstract

Supratentorial hemangioblastomas (HBLs) are rare, benign vascular tumors of the central nervous system neoplasms. Very scarce literature is available regarding supratentorial HBL without von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) syndrome in an adult. We reviewed the literature and PubMed advanced search showed only a few results of supratentorial HBL without VHL syndrome. We reported a rare case of cystic supratentorial HBL in 39-year-old male affecting the parietal lobe without VHL syndrome. Supratentorial HBL is a rare tumor and supratentorial HBL without VHL syndrome are even rarer. Being a rare entity, not much clinical data is currently available regarding supratentorial HBLs, thus necessitating the need for further reporting and review of such cases.

Keywords: Cystic, supratentorial hemangioblastomas, without von Hippel–Lindau

Background

Hemangioblastomas (HBLs) are benign vascular tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) that are composed of vessels and neoplastic stromal cells.[1] They can occur sporadically (66–80% of tumors) or in the context of the familial neoplasia syndrome von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease (20–33% of tumors).[2] They are usually infratentorial in a location with supratentorial HBLs being rare. We reported a rare case of supratentorial HBL in 39-year-old male involving the parietal lobe without VHL syndrome.

Case Presentation

A 40-year-old male patient presented with a headache, weakness of left side body for past 6 months, and seizure since 2 months. There was no history of any inherited disease or cancer in his family. He was well orientated to time, place, and person. Abnormal physical signs were limited to the CNS. Neurological examination revealed decreased the power of 4a/5 in both left upper and lower limb with no sensory involvement. The tendon reflexes were normal and plantar responses flexor. VHL disease was ruled out by chest radiograph, abdominal ultrasonography, fundoscopic examination, and workup for mutation of VHL gene. His blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg. There were no apparent abnormalities in cranial nerves. Investigations revealed hemoglobin of 17.3 g/dl, white cell count 5900 cells/mm3 with a normal differential, and platelet count of 170,000 cells/mm3. Blood urea, serum creatinine, serum electrolytes, liver function tests, blood sugar, serum transaminase, and a midstream specimen of urine were all normal.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) head revealed well defined oval hypodense intra-axial lesion of approximate size 6.2 cm × 4.6 cm in anterior posterior and transverse axis respectively with mild perilesional edema, mass effect with epicentre in right frontoparietal junctional region. Lesion is predominantly cystic with intra-lesion enhancing septa and eccentric solid enhancing tissue. No significant haemorrhage and calcification was shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography head showing well defined oval hypodense cystic intra-axial lesion with mild perilesional edema and mass effect; axial, coronal view

Intra-operatively the tumor was purplish, highly vascular intra-axial, with a good plane, and with multiple small feeders, with normal surrounding brain tissue [Figure 2]. Gross total excision of a vascular tumor measuring 5 cm × 3.7 cm × 3.6 cm from the right frontoparietal lobe was performed and sent for histopathological examination [Figure 3]. Histopathological finding showed a fine vascular network of capillary channels lined by endothelial cells and fine reticulin fibers between the stromal cells which was reported to be “HBL” [Figure 4]. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient's hemoglobin gradually fell to 12.1 g/dl, remaining at a similar level on subsequent follow-up. Follow-up CT scan after 3 months showed no significant intracranial lesion [Figure 5].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Intra-operative photograph of the highly vascular cystic tumor

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Excised tumor specimen

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a and b) Microphotograph shows multiple dilated blood vessels of variable dimension lined by single layer of endothelial cells with intervening stromal cells (H and E, ×40); (c) reticulin stain delineating the vessels and stromal cells (Reticulin, ×100); (d) CD34 negative; immunoreactivity not demonstrated by the endothelial cells and the tumor cells (IHC, CD34, ×400)

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Postoperative computed tomography head showing craniotomy defect, no significant intracranial lesion; axial, coronal view

Discussion and Review of Literature

HBLs are benign neoplasms that originate in the CNS.[3] They represent 1.5–2.5% of all intracranial neoplasms and 7–12% of posterior fossa tumors.[3] They are highly vascular well circumscribed solid or cystic neoplasms of CNS or retina.[4] Also, they are the most common primary intra-axial posterior fossa tumor in adults.[4] They are usually infratentorial, with a majority of them occurring in the cerebellum (76%) around the fourth ventricle and less commonly in the cerebral hemispheres (9%), spinal cord (7%), and brainstem (5%).[5,6]

Supratentorial HBLs, which are quite rare,[7] were first described by Bielschowsky in 1902.[8,9] They are most commonly found in the frontal lobe of the cerebrum followed by parietal and temporal lobe. There is a handful of reported cases of congenital HBLs.[10,11] In the present case, the tumor was present in the parietal region. They often result from loss of function of both alleles of the VHL gene.[12,13] Supratentorial HBLs are rare and have been reported to comprise only 1–6% of all HBLs associated with VHL disease.[14,15,16]

We reported a case of supratentorial HBL in an adult male without VHL syndrome and reviewed the literature. Till date, approximately 139 cases of supratentorial HBLs have been described in the literature out of which 82 cases had VHL syndrome.[16] On reviewing the literature from 1902 to 2014, we found 57 cases of supratentorial HBL without VHL as shown in Table 1.[6,8,9,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65] On reviewing the literature, we found that supratentorial HBL affected patients ranging from 3 months to 80 years with maximum cases belonging to 20–30 years and 40–50 years age group. Among the infants, only one case was found, thus making it a rare tumor in infancy. Most of the cases were found in males. The reported cases either presented as isolated or multiple lesions. On analyzing the tumor consistency, we found most of them were solid whereas only less than one-third were cystic. In this review, we found supratentorial HBL in various locations viz., frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, third ventricle, lateral ventricle, pituitary, pituitary stalk, suprasellar, hippocampus, falx cerebri, corpus callosum, meninges, and choroidal fissure.

Table 1.

Reported cases of supratentorial hemangioblastoma without VHL

graphic file with name AJNS-11-8-g006.jpg

In HBLs, first and second peaks of incidence are in the third and fifth decades of life respectively. HBLs are more common in males than in females (1.3:1 ratio). They may be either asymptomatic or symptomatic.[3]

Clinical characteristics of supratentorial HBL are specific to their location and growth patterns.[66] They are benign lesions thus sign, and symptoms manifest late.[66] Patients usually have no history or the long history of minor neurological symptoms. In maximum cases, it presents as sudden onset of neurological symptoms demanding neurosurgical intervention.[61]

Interestingly, HBLs are the only brain tumors associated with polycythaemia, which is encountered in 9–20% of intracranial tumors, which is not seen with spinal lesions. Polycythaemia is due to unregulated secretion of erythropoietin which is an alpha globulin or similar substance by the neoplastic tissue.[67] Perks et al. in 1976 reported the first case of polycythaemia associated with supratentorial HBL although its association with infratentorial HBLs is well known.[29,68,69]

In supratentorial HBLs, cyst formation seems to be independent of tumor size.[16] In this, peritumoral cysts which originate from peritumoral edema[69] occur more frequently in regions demonstrating anatomic barriers (grey–white matter interface, ventricles) such as the hippocampal region and the basal ganglia.[16] Vasogenic edema diffuses along white-matter tracts and optic system. Edema develops by the diffusion of plasma ultrafiltrate to surrounding brain. The larger volume of cerebrum provides space for edema formation. Cyst develops as an excess of absorptive capacities of the surrounding tissue.[16] Whether cyst in HBL is intratumoral or peritumoral, it is due to vascular leakage because protein content of cyst fluid and blood serum are similar.[70] Cyst formation is less frequent in the supratentorial region compared with the posterior fossa, and extended areas of edema occur with small tumors as the cerebrum offers a bigger volume for edema diffusion compared to cerebellum.[16]

Hemangioblastomas occur either as a part of VHL disease (inherited mutation of VHL gene on 3p25–26 chromosome) or as sporadic tumors (often with somatic mutation of VHL gene). In both settings, activation of the VHL-hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) pathway is thought to be important in tumor biology.[71] The VHL gene product pVHL is a master regulator of HIF-1 alpha (HIF-1α). pVHL is involved in the inhibition of HIF-1α by ubiquitin mediated proteosomal degradation. Due to mutation, pVHL cannot degrade HIF-1α, causing it to accumulate. HIF-1α causes the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet derived growth factor B (PDGF), erythropoietin, and transforming growth factor alpha, which act to stimulate the growth of cells within the tumor.[72] Overproduction of hypoxia inducible factor and its target gene products such as VEGF-2 protein induces recruitment of abundant reactive vascular cells into the tumor and, therefore, seems to be responsible for hypervascularity of these lesions.[73,74]

On histology, these tumors are benign, highly vascular, and composed of stromal cells and vessels. The vascular component consists of small capillaries with a single layer of plump, uniform endothelial cells, whereas the cellular component is characteristic of large and vacuolated stromal cells. Based on the abundance of the stromal cell component, it has been subclassified into two variants: The rarer cellular HBLs defined by zellballen-like cellular clusters of uniform tumor cells, and the more common reticular subtype showing abundant capillaries and stromal cells that may be glial fibrillary acidic protein-immunoreactive leading to erroneous glioma diagnosis.[61,70,75,76] Histological differential diagnosis of HBL includes metastatic renal cell carcinoma and angiomatous meningioma.[60] Intratumoral blood cells island formation on morphology indicates extramedullary hematopoiesis.[75,76]

Radiological imaging by CT scan shows tumor as well circumscribed solid or cystic lesion with a mural nodule.[77] Usually, the nodule is smaller than the cyst that helps to differentiate it from cystic astrocytoma, which has a larger nodule. CT can detect the tumoral pseudocyst as higher density than that of the cerebrospinal fluid, while the nodule is isodense compared with the cerebral white matter. Following intravenous administration of the contrast agent, the nodule typically enhances intensely, whereas the cystic component, generally, does not enhance. Multiplanar CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps in identifying the subpial localization as the nodule usually abuts the pial surface.

MRI is preferred as it has high resolution and sensitivity. The most common finding on MRI is significantly enhancing mural nodule with an adjacent nonenhancing smooth cyst. On gadolinium T1-weighted images, the tumor nodule enhances markedly and homogenously, while the cystic part is hyperintense on T2-weighted images without enhancement. On angiography, a highly vascular tumor within the avascular cyst and feeding vessels directed from the dural arteries is seen.

Proton MRS studies show high mobile lipids (Lip) peaks between 0.9 and 1.4 ppm with no lactate peak, low creatine/phosphocreatine peak, increased, choline-containing compounds in HBL. The absence of N-acetylaspartate peak indicates the nonneurogenic origin of the tumor.[74] Combined with the absence of the necrotic component on MRI, presence of Lip peak on proton MRS is hypothised to be one of the characteristics of HBL. These unique results of proton MRS can play an important role in the differential diagnosis of intracranial HBL.[78]

According to the World Health Organization classification of CNS tumors, HBL is considered as Grade I meningeal neoplasm of uncertain origin.[79] Although benign they cause a mass effect on tumor growth, cyst formation, and peritumoral edema. Thus, surgical resection is the treatment of choice. Mural nodule in tumor must be completely excised to avoid cyst recurrence. Resection of the tumor may be difficult due to hypervascularity of the nidus and location of the tumor.[80] To reduce severe bleeding in tumors located in eloquent locations like medulla and brainstem, presurgical endovascular embolization of the solid component of the tumor, has been tried but has its own complications such as brain ischemia, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and intratumoral haemorrhage.[81]

Stereotactic radiosurgery tumor using either a linear accelerator or a Gamma Knife has also been attempted.[80,82,83] In a study by Sayer et al., which included patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), 15% tumors were stable in volume, 54% decreased, and 31% increased. Local tumor control rates at 1, 5, and 10 years was 89%, 74%, and 50%, respectively. There was a trend toward tumor progression in sporadic patients (P = 0.10), women (P = 0.09), and larger tumors (P = 0.10). In patients with multiple HBLs as compared to those with only a solitary HBL, the radiosurgically treated lesion was 7.9 times more likely to progress after GKRS treatment (P = 0.018). They concluded that stereotactic radiosurgery offers a reasonable rate of tumor control and preservation of neurologic function in patients with HBLs, but patients with multiple HBLs are less likely to exhibit long-term tumor control of treated lesions following radiosurgery.[84]

Antiangiogenic treatment employing VEGF inhibitors may represent a new treatment option. In cases with unresectable lesions, where alternative treatment options such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy fail to produce significant responses, antiangiogenic treatment has been attempted.[85] High levels of VEGF in clinical samples provide the basis for the use of specific antiangiogenic treatment of HBL targeting VEGF signaling. Schuch et al. used antiangiogenic therapy with SU5416, a small molecule inhibiting receptortyrosine kinases such as the VEGF receptor kinase domain region and the PDGF receptor and found that soon after the start of treatment, paresis resolved and preexisting hypesthesia and dysesthesia in decreased.[85] Treatment of VHL–associated HBLs with SU5416 has been reported on a series of three patients[86] where the follow-up of 3 months was too short to evaluate therapeutic success. Another report described a stable clinical remission in one patient with VHL disease and optic nerve HBLs treated with SU5416 over a period of 18 months.[87]

However, which treatment modality is most definitive in supratentorial HBL is not yet known because of the rarity of this tumor and available literature. MRI is recommended as regular follow-up for sporadic supratentorial HBL. Complete resection of hemangioblastoma is curative and is associated with minimum morbidity and 2% mortality.[3]

Conclusion

Supratentorial HBL is a rare and benign neoplasm with a favorable prognosis. Being a rare entity, not much clinical data is currently available regarding supratentorial HBL, thus necessitating the need for further reporting, research, and review of such cases.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Vortmeyer AO, Gnarra JR, Emmert-Buck MR, Katz D, Linehan WM, Oldfield EH, et al. von Hippel-Lindau gene deletion detected in the stromal cell component of a cerebellar hemangioblastoma associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:540–3. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(97)90075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Browne TR, Adams RD, Roberson GH. Hemangioblastoma of the spinal cord. Review and report of five cases. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:435–41. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1976.00500060041009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hussein MR. Central nervous system capillary haemangioblastoma: The pathologist's viewpoint. Int J Exp Pathol. 2007;88:311–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2007.00535.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery. 7th ed. New York: Thieme Publisher; 2010. Tumor; pp. 582–768. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kepes JJ, Slowik F. Arvid Lindau's cerebellar hemangioblastoma 70 years later. Some pediatric aspects. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;824:112–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb46214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Acikalin MF, Oner U, Tel N, Pasaoglu O, Altinel F. Supratentorial hemangioblastoma: A case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:e382–4. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-e382-SHACRA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mills SA, Oh MC, Rutkowski MJ, Sughrue ME, Barani IJ, Parsa AT. Supratentorial hemangioblastoma: Clinical features, prognosis, and predictive value of location for von Hippel-Lindau disease. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14:1097–104. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sharma RR, Cast IP, O’Brien C. Supratentorial haemangioblastoma not associated with von Hippel Lindau complex or polycythaemia: Case report and literature review. Br J Neurosurg. 1995;9:81–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bielschowsky M. For Histology and Pathologic the Gehirngeschwiilste. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd. 1902;22:54–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iplikçioglu AC, Yaradanakul V, Trakya U. Supratentorial haemangioblastoma: Appearances on MR imaging. Br J Neurosurg. 1997;11:576–8. doi: 10.1080/02688699745772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richmond BK, Schmidt JH., 3rd Congenital cystic supratentorial hemangioblastoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:113–5. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.1.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J, Yao M, Duh FM, Orcutt ML, et al. Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science. 1993;260:1317–20. doi: 10.1126/science.8493574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wait SD, Vortmeyer AO, Lonser RR, Chang DT, Finn MA, Bhowmick DA, et al. Somatic mutations in VHL germline deletion kindred correlate with mild phenotype. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:236–40. doi: 10.1002/ana.10807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lonser RR, Glenn GM, Walther M, Chew EY, Libutti SK, Linehan WM, et al. von Hippel-Lindau disease. Lancet. 2003;361:2059–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13643-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Neumann HP, Eggert HR, Scheremet R, Schumacher M, Mohadjer M, Wakhloo AK, et al. Central nervous system lesions in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:898–901. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.10.898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peyre M, David P, Van Effenterre R, François P, Thys M, Emery E, et al. Natural history of supratentorial hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:577–87. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374846.86409.A7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Berger, Guleke About Brain tumors and their surgical treatment. Dtsch Z Chir. 1927;203-204:104–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schley W. About the occurence a gehirncysten with simultaneous formation of tumors. Virchows Arch. 1927;265:665–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marrioti D. Angioreticuloma of corpus callosum. Pathologica. 1936;28:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zeitlin H. Hemangioblastomas of meninges and their relation to Lindau's disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1942;1:14–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kautzky R, Vierdt N. An Angioblastoma of the cerebrum. Zbl Neurochir. 1953;13:158–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Floris V, Severini P, Castorina G. Angioreticuloma of brain. Contribution clinical and angiographic. Riv Neurol. 1954;24:642–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grattarola FR. Hemangioblastoma of the brain. Clinical and anatomical pathology. Cancer. 1955;8:3–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morello G, Bianchi M. Cerebral hemangioblastomas: Review of literature and report of two personal cases. J Neurosurg. 1963;20:254–64. doi: 10.3171/jns.1963.20.3.0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stein AA, Schilp AO, Whitfield RD. The histogenesis of hemangioblastoma of the brain. A review of twenty-one cases. J Neurosurg. 1960;17:751–61. doi: 10.3171/jns.1960.17.4.0751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Papo I, Colombo F, Dorizzi A. Considerations about 45 cases of angioreticuloma brain. Historical introduction. Minerva Neurochir. 1961;5:90–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rivera E, Chason JL. Cerebral hemangioblastoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1966;25:452–4. doi: 10.3171/jns.1966.25.4.0452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ishwar S, Taniguchi RM, Vogel FS. Multiple supratentorial hemangioblastomas. Case study and ultrastructural characteristics. J Neurosurg. 1971;35:396–405. doi: 10.3171/jns.1971.35.4.0396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Perks WH, Cross JN, Sivapragasam S, Johnson P. Supratentorial haemangioblastoma with polycythaemia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39:218–20. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.39.3.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grisoli F, Gambarelli D, Raybaud C, Guibout M, Leclercq T. Suprasellar hemangioblastoma. Surg Neurol. 1984;22:257–62. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(84)90010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Miyagi A, Goto T, Miyagami M, Suzuki K. Solitary hemangioblastoma within the third ventricle. Surg Neurol. 1987;27:157–62. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(87)90288-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Neumann HP, Eggert HR, Weigel K, Friedburg H, Wiestler OD, Schollmeyer P. Hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system. A 10-year study with special reference to von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:24–30. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Black ML, Tien RD, Hesselink JR. Third ventricular hemangioblastoma: MR appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:553. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kachhara R, Nair S, Radhakrishnan VV. Sellar-sphenoid sinus hemangioblastoma: Case report. Surg Neurol. 1998;50:461–3. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00197-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Choi DH, Kim HS, Mok JH, Kim DH, Lee KC, Lee YB. Supratentorial meningeal hemangioblastoma: Case report. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1998;27:1299–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Isaka T, Horibe K, Nakatani S, Maruno M, Yoshimine T. Hemangioblastoma of the third ventricle. Neurosurg Rev. 1999;22:140–4. doi: 10.1007/s101430050050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tarantino R, Isidori A, Raco A, Missori P. Supratentorial hemangioblastoma in a patient with breast cancer. A case report. J Neurosurg Sci. 2000;44:137–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yamakawa N, Noda M, Ohyama T, Furuno M, Tsutsumi A, Taki W. A cellular variant of supratentorial hemangioblastoma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2000;17:15–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02478913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim HS, Park SH, Cho BM, Kim DH, Oh SM. Supratentorial hemangioblastma, occurred after total removal of recurrent cerebellar hemangioblastoma – Case report. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2001;30:348–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ikeda M, Asada M, Yamashita H, Ishikawa A, Tamaki N. A case of suprasellar hemangioblastoma with thoracic meningioma. No Shinkei Geka. 2001;29:679–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ozveren MF, Topsakal C, Erol FS, Kaplan M, Uchida K, Tanik C. Tentorial vascularization in solid hemangioblastoma – Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2001;41:201–5. doi: 10.2176/nmc.41.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rumboldt Z, Gnjidic Z, Talan-Hranilovic J, Vrkljan M. Intrasellar hemangioblastoma: Characteristic prominent vessels on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1480–1. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Agostinelli C, Roncaroli F, Galassi E, Bernardi B, Acciarri N, Tani G. Leptomeningeal hemangioblastoma. Case illustration. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(1 Suppl):122. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Iyigun OL, Cogluk C, Aydin K, Yildiz L, Rakunt C, Celik F. Supratentorial leptomeningeal hemangioblastoma mimicking a meningioma without von Hippel-Lindau complex. Turk Neurosurg. 2004;14:25–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Peker S, Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Sun I, Sav A, Pamir MN. Suprasellar haemangioblastoma. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2005;12:85–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tekkök IH, Sav A. Supratentorial cystic hemangioblastoma with infratentorial extension – A unique location and a rare infant case. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:1177–81. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cosar M, Hatiboglu MA, Iplikcioglu AC, Ozcan D. Parasagittal leptomeningeal hemangioblastoma – Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:294–7. doi: 10.2176/nmc.46.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ohata K, Takami T, Tsuyuguchi N, Hara M, Haque M. Hemangioblastoma of hippocampus without von Hippel-Lindau disease: Case report and review of literature. Neurol India. 2006;54:89–90. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.24718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Murali R, Jones WI, Ma Wyatt J. A 57-year-old man with a dural-based parietal lobe tumor. Brain Pathol. 2007;17:460–3, 474. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00091_1.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sherman JH, Le BH, Okonkwo DO, Jane JA. Supratentorial dural-based hemangioblastoma not associated with von Hippel Lindau complex. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007;149:969–72. doi: 10.1007/s00701-007-1180-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jang H. Supratentorial leptomeningeal hemangioblastoma: Case report. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2007;24:S770–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Takeuchi H, Hashimoto N, Kitai R, Kubota T. A report of supratentorial leptomeningeal hemangioblastoma and a literature review. Neuropathology. 2008;28:98–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2007.00834.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jaggi RS, Premsagar IC, Abhishek Hemangioblastoma of the lateral ventricle. Neurol India. 2009;57:677–9. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.57797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peyre M, Di Rocco F, Varlet P, Giraud S, Richard S, Sainte-Rose C, et al. Supratentorial hemangioblastoma in the neonatal period. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;45:155–6. doi: 10.1159/000209656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Elguezabal A, Díaz ML, Landeyro J, Gené M, Boutayeb L, Escosa M, et al. Solid-cystic supratentorial hemangioblastoma affecting the falx cerebri. Report of a case. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2010;21:401–4. doi: 10.4321/s1130-14732010000500006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Crisi G, Giombelli E, Ventura E. Non-von Hippel-Lindau hemangioblastoma in the hippocampus: Characterization with time-resolved MRA using TRICKS sequence at 3T. A case report. Neuroradiol J. 2010;23:416–9. doi: 10.1177/197140091002300407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schär RT, Vajtai I, Sahli R, Seiler RW. Manifestation of a sellar hemangioblastoma due to pituitary apoplexy: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:496. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang B, Luan S, Cao X, Bao W. Supratentorial hemangioblastoma. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2011;16:150–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kaloostian P, Taylor C. Supratentorial dural-based haemangioblastoma in a Native American patient without von Hippel Lindau syndrome. J Surg Case Rep 2012. 2012:11. doi: 10.1093/jscr/2012.6.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sarkari A, Agrawal D. Midline basifrontal solid hemangioblastoma in non von Hippel Lindau syndrome patient. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012;3:399–401. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.102642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.She DJ, Xing Z, Liu Y, Cao DR. Supratentorial hemangioblastomas: Three case reports and review of the literature. Clin Neuroradiol. 2013;23:243–7. doi: 10.1007/s00062-012-0183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kishore PV, Ratnan H, Dharmapuri A, Ravinder T, Srinivas V. Supratentorial hemangioblastoma: A case report and review of literature. J Chalmeda Anand Rao Inst Med Sci. 2013;6:67–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Al-Najar M, Al-Hadidy A, Saleh A, Al-Tamimi A, Al-Darawish A, Obeidat F. Sporadic Lateral Ventricular Hemangioblastoma presenting with Intraventricular and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013;13:597–600. doi: 10.12816/0003324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xie T, Zhang X, Hu F, Wang X, Wang J, Yu Y, et al. Suprasellar hemangioblastoma mimicking a craniopharyngioma: Result of extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach – Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2013;53:735–9. doi: 10.2176/nmc.cr2011-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Raghava M, Joshi U, Mathur A. Hemangioblastoma of cerebral cortex-unusual presentation and review of literature. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2014;4:165–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yasargill MG, editor. Microneurosurgery 1V B Microneurosurgery of CNS Tumors. Stuttgart: George Theime Verlag; 1996. Vascular tumors; pp. 385–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.So CC, Ho LC. Polycythemia secondary to cerebellar hemangioblastoma. Am J Hematol. 2002;71:346–7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.10196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Palmer JJ. Haemangioblastomas. A review of 81 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1972;27:125–48. doi: 10.1007/BF01401877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lonser RR, Vortmeyer AO, Butman JA, Glasker S, Finn MA, Ammerman JM, et al. Edema is a precursor to central nervous system peritumoral cyst formation. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:392–9. doi: 10.1002/ana.20584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Crisi G, Filice S, Pertinhez T, Ventura E, Servadei F. In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the characterization of hemangioblastoma cyst fluid: Case report. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:29–32. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a9103a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li M, Song J, Pytel P. Expression of HIF-1 regulated proteins vascular endothelial growth factor, carbonic anhydrase IX and hypoxia inducible gene 2 in hemangioblastomas. Folia Neuropathol. 2014;52:234–42. doi: 10.5114/fn.2014.45564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kaelin WG. Von Hippel-Lindau-associated malignancies: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2005;2:225–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Richard S, Martin S, David P, Decq P. Von Hippel-Lindau disease and central nervous system hemangioblastoma. Progress in genetics and clinical management. Neurochirurgie. 1998;44:258–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chan CC, Vortmeyer AO, Chew EY, Green WR, Matteson DM, Shen DF, et al. VHL gene deletion and enhanced VEGF gene expression detected in the stromal cells of retinal angioma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:625–30. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.5.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rickert CH, Hasselblatt M, Jeibmann A, Paulus W. Cellular and reticular variants of hemangioblastoma differ in their cytogenetic profiles. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1452–7. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hasselblatt M, Jeibmann A, Gerss J, Behrens C, Rama B, Wassmann H, et al. Cellular and reticular variants of haemangioblastoma revisited: A clinicopathologic study of 88 cases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2005;31:618–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2005.00669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. [Last accessed on 2015 Jun 02]. Available from: http://www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/340994.overview .
  • 78.Isobe T, Yamamoto T, Akutsu H, Anno I, Shiigai M, Zaboronok A, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings of hemangioblastoma. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:318–21. doi: 10.1007/s11604-010-0421-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:97–109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Takeuchi S, Tanaka R, Fujii Y, Abe H, Ito Y. Surgical treatment of hemangioblastomas with presurgical endovascular embolization. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2001;41:246–51. doi: 10.2176/nmc.41.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sakamoto N, Ishikawa E, Nakai Y, Akutsu H, Yamamoto T, Nakai K, et al. Preoperative endovascular embolization for hemangioblastoma in the posterior fossa. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:878–84. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chang SD, Meisel JA, Hancock SL, Martin DP, McManus M, Adler JR., Jr Treatment of hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:28–34. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199807000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pan L, Wang EM, Wang BJ, Zhou LF, Zhang N, Cai PW, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for hemangioblastomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1998;70(Suppl 1):179–86. doi: 10.1159/000056420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sayer FT, Nguyen J, Starke RM, Yen CP, Sheehan JP. Gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial hemangioblastomas – Outcome at 3 years. World Neurosurg. 2011;75:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schuch G, de Wit M, Höltje J, Laack E, Schilling G, Hossfeld DK, et al. Case 2. Hemangioblastomas: Diagnosis of von Hippel-Lindau disease and antiangiogenic treatment with SU5416. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3624–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Richard S, Croisille L, Yvart J, Casadeval N, Eschwège P, Aghakhani N, et al. Paradoxical secondary polycythemia in von Hippel-Lindau patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor therapy. Blood. 2002;99:3851–3. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.10.3851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Aiello LP, George DJ, Cahill MT, Wong JS, Cavallerano J, Hannah AL, et al. Rapid and durable recovery of visual function in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome after systemic therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor su5416. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1745–51. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Journal of Neurosurgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES