Skip to main content
Conservation Physiology logoLink to Conservation Physiology
. 2016 Jan 22;4(1):cov069. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov069

Links between parasitism, energy reserves and fecundity of European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus, in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea

Dolors Ferrer-Maza 1,*, Josep Lloret 1, Marta Muñoz 1, Elisabeth Faliex 2, Sílvia Vila 1, Pierre Sasal 3
PMCID: PMC4732407  PMID: 27293748

This study assesses, for the first time, the interrelationships between size, fecundity, energy reserves and parasitism in female European anchovy, in order to analyse the potential implications for the health of the northwestern Mediterranean anchovy stock arising from the current shortage of large individuals.

Keywords: Engraulis encrasicolus, fecundity, fish condition, parasitism

Abstract

The European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus L. 1758, is one of the most sought-after target species in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. However, this stock currently consists of small individuals, and landings are reported to have decreased considerably. The main purpose of this study was to assess, for the first time, the interrelationships between size, fecundity, energy reserves and parasitism in female anchovies, in order to analyse the potential implications for the health of northwestern Mediterranean anchovy stocks arising from the current shortage of large individuals. Results revealed that smaller individuals show lower fecundity, lower lipid content and a higher intensity of certain parasites. As it is known that smaller individuals now predominate in the population, the relationships found in this study indicate that the health of anchovies from the northwestern Mediterranean is currently impaired.

Introduction

The European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus L. 1758, is a small planktivorous pelagic fish with a wide distribution range comprising the Atlantic coast of Europe and western Africa, the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea (Fischer et al., 1987). The global catch of European anchovy in 2012 was 489,297 tonnes, which is 20% less than in 2003 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2014). In the western Mediterranean Sea, anchovy remains one of the most sought-after target species by commercial trawlers or purse seiners, although landings of this species have been steadily declining since 2000 (Palomera et al., 2007). Indeed, although the abundance of anchovy in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea remains relatively high, its biomass and the mean size of individuals have diminished dramatically (Van Beveren et al., 2014).

Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the decrease in anchovy landings. It has been pointed out that the extension of the fishing season has led to recruitment overfishing, which may be affecting the northwestern Mediterranean anchovy stock (Lleonart and Maynou, 2003). Another factor is that the size at first maturity for anchovy is greater than the minimal legal landing size established for this species in the Mediterranean Sea (Palomera et al., 2003; Tsikliras and Stergiou, 2014), and this may be affecting its reproductive potential. In addition, changes in environmental conditions, such as decreasing river flows and increasing water temperatures, have also been identified as possible factors in the decline in anchovy landings (Lloret et al., 2004; Martín et al., 2012). Recently, special attention has been paid to the changes in the size distribution and condition of anchovy and their potential links with its presently low biomass in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea (as recorded by Van Beveren et al., 2014).

Certainly, fish condition parameters are essential for estimating the health and productivity of exploited populations. In particular, they are a highly significant indicator of their condition (reviewed by Lloret et al., 2012, 2014). Therefore, studying the energy reserves of anchovies and the lipid storage dynamics throughout their reproductive cycle could shed some light on the status of anchovy stocks in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. In contrast, parasitism has also been identified as a factor affecting the condition and reproduction of several fish species (e.g. Barber and Svensson 2003; Bagamian et al., 2004; Bean and Bonner 2009). However, only a few studies have analysed the relationships between parasitism, energy reserves and reproduction in commercially exploited fish species in the Mediterranean (Ferrer-Maza et al., 2015, 2014). There is, to our knowledge, only one other study concerning the European anchovy, carried out in the Black Sea, which has looked into the effects of parasites (in this case, nematodes) on the lipid composition of the European anchovy (Shchepkina, 1985). Nevertheless, given that there are a number of well-known cases of collapse in anchovy fisheries and considering the social and economic upheaval such collapses can cause (Pita et al., 2014), the health of anchovy stocks is well worth studying.

Consequently, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the health of the northwestern Mediterranean anchovy stock based on three indicators (energy reserves, fecundity and parasitism) and to discuss the possible implications of the shortage of large individuals in this stock. We analysed the interrelationships among size, fecundity and two important health indicators, namely lipid content and metazoan parasitism, in female anchovies throughout their reproductive cycle. These interrelationships are discussed from biological and ecological perspectives in order to provide information that can be used to improve the management of this stock, which is highly valued but in a poor state.

Materials and methods

Fish sampling

A total of 271 female specimens of European anchovy, E. encrasicolus, were collected on a monthly basis from January 2011 to November 2012. The samples were obtained from commercial trawlers and purse seiners at the port of Roses, which is one of the most important commercial fishing harbours in the region (Fig. 1). The specimens were caught near Cap de Creus (northwestern Mediterranean Sea) and its adjacent waters (no further than 25 miles from the shoreline between 42°33′–41°40′N and 3°03′–2°48′E; Fig. 1). The specimens were transported on ice to the laboratory, where they were immediately dissected. For each individual, the total body length (LT; ±0.1 cm), total body mass (MT; ±0.01 g), eviscerated body mass (ME; ±0.01 g), muscle mass (MM; ±0.01 g) and gonad mass (MG; ±0.1 mg) were recorded. All the muscle tissue of each specimen was removed and frozen at −20°C for a subsequent determination of lipid content, whereas the ovaries were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for histological processing and estimation of fecundity. The total lengths (LT) of all specimens ranged from 10.4 to 16.7 cm (mean ± SD = 13.8 ± 1.2 cm, n = 271); among these were nine immature specimens ranging from 10.4 to 12.7 cm (11.43 ± 0.63 cm, n = 9).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Map of the Cap de Creus (northwestern Mediterranean Sea), showing the port of Roses, where anchovies were sampled. The shaded area represents approximately the zone of capture.

Classification of reproductive phase

The gonadosomatic index (IG), which is the relationship between gonad mass (MG) and eviscerated body mass (ME) of the females, was calculated as IG = 100MG ME−1. Subsequently, one ovarian lobe from each specimen was fixed and sliced transversely in its midsection. The resulting slices were embedded in paraffin, cut into 8–10 µm sections, and stained with both Haematoxylin and Eosin and Mallory’s trichrome stains. The latter staining method highlights the zona radiata and its continuity and facilitates the detection of atretic oocytes (Muñoz et al., 2010), i.e. degenerating oocytes that will not be spawned. In the present study we estimated the α atresia, which is the earliest stage of atresia, in which yolked oocytes undergo resorption of yolk. The prevalence of atresia (PA) was calculated as the proportion of females with observed α-atretic oocytes; the relative intensity of atresia (IA) was calculated for each specimen as the number of α-atretic oocytes divided by the total number of vitellogenic oocytes (atretic and normal). Following Brown-Peterson et al. (2011), all the specimens were classified into six ovarian developmental phases depending upon the presence of specific histological markers. These phases (and the percentage of specimens in each phase) are as follows: immature [3.3%; fish have not reached the sexual maturity (never spawned)]; regenerating (19.9%; sexually mature but reproductively inactive); developing (3.3%; fish with gametes that are beginning to develop); spawning capable (25.5%; advanced, developed gametes ready for the spawning season); actively spawning (30.6%; oocytes in migratory nucleus stage, hydration or ovulation); and regressing (17.4%; massive atresia, which indicates the end of the reproductive cycle).

Estimation of fecundity

The fecundity estimation was performed on all the specimens that had oocytes in the migratory nucleus stage but did not have recently spawned follicles (n = 31). This estimation was performed following the oocyte size–frequency method described by Hunter et al. (1985). The females selected were from the actively spawning group and had oocytes in the migratory nucleus stage, i.e. the most advanced stage before hydration and release. All the 31 females were caught between June and August. To ensure that these specimens had not recently released some of their mature oocytes, we used the postovulatory follicle (POF) degeneration key proposed by Alday et al. (2010). This key is based on histological features and proposes seven stages of degeneration of POF, as follows: stage I, new POFs; stage II, first signs of degeneration of POFs; stage III, POFs become shrunken; stage IV, clear decrease in size of POFs; stage V, rupture of the cell walls; stage VI, very reduced POFs; and stage VII, no cellular differentiation can be observed. In the present study, any females with recently spawned follicles (stages I–IV) were not selected. Subsequently, slices from the central area of the 31 selected ovaries were weighed (±0.1 mg) and the oocytes separated using a washing process, as described by Lowerre-Barbieri and Barbieri (1993), and sorted by size through several sieves (from 200 to 600 µm). The oocytes were counted and their diameters measured using a computer-aided image analysis system (Image-Pro® Plus 5.1; Media Cybernetics, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA). Given that the oocyte size distribution followed a two-component mixture model, we applied an algorithm of the mixtools package (Benaglia et al., 2009) for R software (www.r-project.org). This statistical procedure, which had been successfully used in a previous study (Ferrer-Maza et al., 2014), was used to describe quantitatively the properties of the overlapping mixtures, i.e. the two different statistical components of the oocyte size distributions, and to calculate the number of oocytes belonging to the next batch. Given that E. encrasicolus is a multiple spawner with indeterminate fecundity (Ganias et al., 2014), the reproductive capacity of the individuals was estimated according to the batch fecundity (FB), defined as the number of eggs spawned per batch, and the relative batch fecundity (FBrel), defined as the value of batch fecundity per gram of eviscerated female body mass.

Determination of energy reserves

To assess the energy reserves of anchovies, first, a visual assessment of their mesenteric fat was carried out following van der Lingen and Hutchings (2005). All the specimens were allocated to one of the five mesenteric fat stages, defined as follows: stage 1, no fat string associated with intestine; stage 2, fat string visible, with thickness less than that of intestine; stage 3, fat string thickness approximately equal to intestinal width; stage 4, fat string thickness greater than intestine, but intestine partly visible; and stage 5, intestine completely covered by fat string. Thereafter, a subsample of muscles (n = 210) was selected to perform the lipid extraction and evaluation. In this subsample, all the parasitized specimens and 60% of the non-parasitized specimens were selected in order to have representatives of individuals in different ovarian developmental phases and with different sizes. The total lipid content (percentage wet mass) in muscle was determined following the Soxhlet method described by Shahidi (2001). A lipid musculosomatic index (ILM) was calculated as ILM = 100ABSM ME−1, where ABSM is the absolute lipid content in muscle, which was obtained by multiplying the lipid content (percentage wet mass) by the wet mass of the muscle. The ILM and the mesenteric fat stage were considered as indicators of anchovy condition because the muscle tissue and the mesenterial fat constitute the primary and secondary lipid repositories, respectively, in anchovy (Melo, 1992).

Evaluation of parasitism

All the specimens were examined for metazoan parasites prior to the removal of muscle and gonads for determination of lipid content and histology. The entire viscera were removed from the body cavity and the internal organs examined using a stereomicroscope. A large subsample of individuals (the first 75 samples) was also examined for metazoan parasites in the musculature. The samples of muscle were examined after filleting and flattening the tissue onto a trans-illumination platform. As no metazoan parasites were found in these examinations, it was decided to regard the number of parasites in the musculature as negligible. When found, the parasites were collected and washed with a saline solution (0.8% NaCl). They were first observed alive and then fixed in permanent preparations. Nematodes were preserved in 70% ethanol and cleared in Amann’s lactophenol, whereas digeneans were fixed in Bouin’s solution under slight coverslip pressure and then stained with Grenacher’s alcoholic borax carmine solution and mounted in Canada balsam. Parasites were morphologically identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level following the available keys and descriptions, such as Petter and Maillard (1988) and Moravec (2007) for nematodes or Gibson et al. (2002), Jones et al. (2005) and Bray et al. (2008) for digeneans. As the identification of the parasite species is normally based on adult features, some of the parasite larvae found in this study could not be identified to the species level. Therefore, the real number of different species might be higher than reported, because there may be several different species within the groups classified as Hemiuridae metacercariae, Didymozoidae metacercariae, Anisakis sp. (type I larvae), Spinitectus sp., unidentified nematode larvae and Tetraphyllidean plerocercoids. However, although this may be important in certain types of biodiversity studies, in our case, we have assumed that each group we have classified consists of parasites with very similar life cycles and morphology and that the members of each group probably have the same consequences on the condition of their hosts. Following Bush et al. (1997), the prevalence of parasites (PP) was calculated as the proportion of fish infected with a given parasite species, and the individual intensity of the infection was calculated as the number of individuals of a particular species in a single infected host. The mean intensity was calculated as the average number of parasites of a given species found in the infected hosts. Although mean intensity is useful to compare results with other studies because it is one of the most commonly reported parameters, median intensity and its confidence interval (CI) can be a more precise and informative parameter because the majority of parasites are usually found in a very few hosts (Rózsa et al., 2000). Therefore, in the present study the median intensity and its 95% CI were also calculated.

Data analysis

The aggregated distribution of parasites leads to the concentration of a high proportion of individuals of a particular parasite in a few specimens of the host. As argued by Rózsa et al. (2000), it is useful to report the CI for the median intensity of infection. For this reason, the median 95% CI was calculated using the free Quantitative Parasitology 3.0 software (Reiczigel and Rózsa, 2005). This software, which was developed to manage the particularly left-biased frequency distribution of parasites, was also used to compare the prevalences (Fisher’s exact test) and the median intensities (Mood’s median test) for each parasite species throughout the different ovarian developmental phases of the hosts. As normality could not be achieved by any method, several non-parametric tests [Mann–Whitney U-test (U) and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rs)] were performed to assess the possible relationships between parasitism and energy reserves (ILM) and/or fecundity (FBrel). The level of statistical significance adopted was P < 0.05, and a false discovery rate approach was used to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995; Verhoeven et al., 2005).

Results

Reproductive cycle

Higher values of IG were observed in specimens captured from April until August, with the highest monthly mean in June (mean ± SD = 5.72 ± 2.59, n = 23). Indeed, as shown in Fig. 2, the histological examination of the ovaries showed that mature females spent the period from October to February in the regenerating phase until March, when specimens in the developing phase were detected. Between April and August, the spawning period took place, because females in spawning capable or actively spawning phases were observed. Finally, individuals in the regressing phase appeared from July to September. Ovaries with atretic oocytes were not detected among individuals in the regenerating phase, but different intensities of atresia (IA) were found in specimens during other phases, as follows: (i) developing (PA = 22.2%, IA = 18.5%); (ii) spawning capable (PA = 10.1%, IA = 13.7%); and (iii) actively spawning (PA = 8.4%, IA = 28.2%). Finally, all the individuals in the regressing phase (PA = 100%) showed massive atresia (75% < IA ≤ 100%).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Monthly variations in the relative frequency of ovarian developmental phases in anchovies (from January 2011 to November 2012). Immature specimens are not shown in this figure.

Fecundity

The batch fecundity (FB) and the relative batch fecundity (FBrel) were calculated for 31 females that were in the actively spawning phase and had oocytes at the migratory nucleus stage. The oocyte diameter–frequency distribution of these females showed a bimodal distribution (Fig. 3), with a first component (smaller diameters) containing oocytes at different stages of development (mainly at cortical alveolar and vitellogenic stages) and a second component (larger diameters) containing only oocytes at an advanced stage of maturation (mainly at the migratory nucleus stage), which were considered as being the batch that was about to be released. The FB ranged from 981 to 21 750 eggs (11 998 ± 5397, n = 31) and was positively related to the size of the specimen. The total length–batch fecundity points fitted a power function regression with the following equation: FB = 5.708 × 10−8 × LT9.640 (r2 = 0.66, n = 31, P < 0.001). The FBrel ranged from 96 to 983 eggs (587 ± 227, n = 31) and was also positively related to total length as follows: FBrel = 1.400 × 10−5 × LT6.490 (r2 = 0.49, n = 31, P < 0.001).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Oocyte diameter–frequency distribution (for oocytes >200 µm), representing most of the female anchovy specimens with oocytes in the migratory nucleus stage. This example corresponds to one female with total body length = 14.9 cm and batch fecundity = 10 672 eggs. The inset shows the two different statistical components of the overlapping mixture distribution. Oocytes with 95% probabilities of belonging to the second component (larger-diameter group) were considered as being part of the next batch.

Energy reserves

In relationship to condition, the lipid musculosomatic index (ILM) values ranged from 0.31 to 7.58 (1.97 ± 1.65, n = 210). The relationship between ILM and the total length showed a significant positive correlation (rs = 0.38, n = 210, P < 0.001). Despite the moderate regression coefficient, it can be observed in Fig. 4 that the larger specimens (more than ∼12.5 cm) had a high variability in their ILM, but all the smaller specimens (up to 12.5 cm) had low values of ILM. There was also a positive correlation (rs = 0.56, n = 210, P < 0.001) between ILM and the mesenteric fat stages. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 5, the mean ILM increased as mesenteric fat increased through the five fat stages described in the Materials and methods. In contrast, a Kruskal–Wallis test (H = 31.25, n = 210, P < 0.001) was used to test for differences in the ILM between the different ovarian developmental phases (Fig. 6). Immature and regenerating specimens showed lower values of ILM than specimens in the other four phases, among which there were no significant differences in their ILM values. Finally, there was no relationship between ILM and fecundity, because no correlation was found between ILM and FB (rs = 0.13, n = 26, P = 0.518) or between ILM and FBrel (rs = 0.11, n = 26, P = 0.591).

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Scatterplot of lipid musculosomatic index (ILM) of anchovies in relationship to total body length (n = 210).

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

Mean lipid musculosomatic index (ILM) of anchovies in relationship to mesenteric fat stages. The bars represent ±SD.

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

Box-and-whisker plots of lipid musculosomatic index (ILM) in relationship to the different ovarian developmental phases of anchovies. Significant differences among groups (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.05) are indicated with different letters.

Parasitism

Of all the dissected anchovy specimens, 62.7% were infected with at least one metazoan parasite taxa, with a median intensity that ranged from four to five parasites (95% CI). More than 5000 parasites were classified into eight helminth taxa: three digeneans, four nematodes and one cestode (Table 1). The hemiurid metacercariae (Digenea) were the most prevalent parasites, with a prevalence of 36.16%. However, the parasites with the highest intensity of infection were the tetraphyllidean plerocercoids (Cestoda), with a mean intensity of 197.52 ± 378.57. It should be noted that the only parasite species found at the adult stage, the digenean Aphanurus stossichi, was also relatively prevalent (PP = 23.62%), as well as the L3 larvae of the nematode Hysterothylacium aduncum (PP = 18.08%).

Table 1:

Taxonomic composition, number of infected hosts, prevalence and intensities of metazoan parasites found in the European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus, from Cap de Creus (northwestern Mediterranean Sea)

Parasite species Stage Site Ovarian developmental phase Infected hosts PP (n = 271) Intensity
Minimum–maximum Mean ± SD Median 95% CI
Digenea
Aphanurus stossichi (Monticelli, 1891) A S IM, REG, SC, AS, REGR 64 23.62 (1–25) 3.31 ± 3.50 (2–3)
 Hemiuridae M P IM, REG, DEV, SC, AS, REGR 98 36.16 (1–100) 9.79 ± 15.04 (3–4)
 Didymozoidae M P DEV, SC, AS 10 3.69 (1–7) 2.60 ± 2.17 (1–6)
Nematoda
Anisakis sp. (type I larvae) L3 I REG, SC, AS, REGR 11 4.06 (1–2) 1.09 ± 0.30 (1–1)
Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802) L3 I IM, REG, DEV, SC, AS, REGR 49 18.08 (1–4) 1.45 ± 0.74 (1–1)
Spinitectus sp. L I REG, AS 3 1.11 (1–1) 1 1
 Unidentified larvae L I REG, SC, AS 21 7.75 (1–3) 1.29 ± 0.64 (1–1)
Cestoda
 Tetraphyllidean P I REG, SC, AS, REGR 23 8.49 (1–1000a) 197.52 ± 378.57 (2–100)

The parasite developmental stage, the site of infection and the ovarian developmental phase of hosts are also given. Abbreviations: n, sample size; and ’PP, prevalence. Stage: A, adult; L, immature larvae; L3, third-stage larvae; M, metacercariae; and P, plerocercoid larvae. Preferred site: I, intestines; P, pyloric caeca; and S, stomach. Ovarian developmental phase of hosts: AS, actively spawning; DEV, developing; IM, immature; REG, regenerating; REGR, regressing; and ’SC, spawning capable. aUp to 1000 plerocercoids were counted for four individual hosts, but the real intensities might be higher.

In three cases, the digenean A. stossichi, the hemiurid metacercariae and the nematode H. aduncum, the Fisher’s exact test showed significant differences (P < 0.001) between prevalences during the different ovarian developmental phases of their hosts (Fig. 7). Overall, immature anchovy specimens and those in the regenerating phase showed higher parasite prevalences than specimens in the other developmental phases. Despite the significant differences in parasite prevalences, the Mood’s median test showed no difference among the median intensities of any parasite species during the different ovarian developmental phases of their hosts. There was, however, a negative relationship between anchovy length and individual intensity of infection for the aforementioned three parasites, as follows: (i) A. stossichi, rs = −0.40, n = 271, P < 0.001, (ii) the hemiurid metacercariae, rs = −0.18, n = 271, P = 0.004; and (iii) H. aduncum, rs = −0.21, n = 271, P = 0.002. In contrast, this relationship was positive in the case of the didymozoid metacercariae (rs = 0.20, n = 271, P = 0.002).

Figure 7:

Figure 7:

Prevalences (PP) of parasites in relationship to the different ovarian developmental phases of anchovies. Significant differences among groups (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.05) are indicated with different letters.

Relationships between parasitism and energy reserves and fecundity

Anchovies in regenerating, spawning capable, actively spawning and regressing phases showed significant differences in their energy reserves (ILM) and fecundity (BFrel) related to parasitism (Table 2). Specimens in the regenerating phase and infected by the digenean A. stossichi displayed lower median values of ILM compared with uninfected specimens (Mann–Whitney U-test; Table 2). There was also a negative correlation between individual intensities of infection by this digenean and individual values of ILM (Spearman’s rank correlation; Table 2). Similar results were found for the anchovies in spawning capable, actively spawning and regressing phases infected by the hemiurid metacercariae. Similar negative correlations were found for individuals in the actively spawning phase infected by the unidentified nematode larvae as well as for the specimens in the regressing phase infected by A. stossichi. Negative relationships were also found between fecundity and infection by A. stossichi or H. aduncum. Conversely, anchovies infected by the didymozoid metacercariae showed higher median values of BFrel than uninfected specimens, and a positive correlation between individual intensities of infection and individual values of BFrel was found. Finally, the specimens in the regressing phase infected by Anisakis sp. also showed a positive correlation between individual intensities of infection and individual values of ILM, although no significant differences were found between specimens infected by this nematode and uninfected ones (Mann–Whitney U-test). For the remaining parasites (Spinitectus sp. and the tetraphyllidean plerocercoids), no significant correlation was found for either the energy reserves or the fecundity of the host, nor was there any significant relationship between parasitism and energy reserves of immature or developing anchovies (whose fecundity cannot be evaluated).

Table 2:

Results of Mann–Whitney U-test used to verify the existence of differences between infected and uninfected E. encrasicolus and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rs) used to evaluate possible relationships between the individual intensities of parasitism and the energy reserves and fecundity of fish

Ovarian developmental phase (n) Parasite Variable Mann–Whitney U-test
Spearman’s rank correlation
n Uninf. n Inf. Md Uninf. Md Inf. U P-valuea n rs P-value
Regenerating (54) Aphanurus stossichi ILM 23 23 1.090 0.758 175 0.049 46 −0.318 0.031
Spawning capable (69) Hemiuridae (metacercariae) ILM 33 24 2.276 1.044 267 0.037 57 −0.271 0.041
Actively spawning (83) Hemiuridae (metacercariae) ILM 43 22 1.524 1.168 326 0.042 65 −0.262 0.035
Unidentified nematode larvae ILM 54 11 1.547 1.057 177 0.036 65 −0.268 0.031
Aphanurus stossichi BFrel 28 3 594.0 416.0 8 0.023 31 −0.419 0.019
Didymozoidae (metacercariae) BFrel 24 7 543.5 701.0 129 0.033 31 0.384 0.033
Hysterothylacium aduncum BFrel 28 3 594.0 244.0 10 0.032 31 −0.390 0.030
Regressing (47) Aphanurus stossichi ILM 20 10 2.355 1.017 30 0.002 30 −0.585 0.001
Hemiuridae (metacercariae) ILM 23 7 2.035 1.353 40 0.047 30 −0.397 0.030
Anisakis sp. ILM 30 0.366 0.047

Abbreviations: Inf., infected fish; Md, variable median; n, subsample size; and Uninf., uninfected fish. Variables: BFrel, relative batch fecundity; and ILM, lipid musculosomatic index. aAsymptotic significances (two-tailed) are displayed for Mann–Whitney U-tests with sample size >10 in both groups; otherwise, exact significances [2 × (one-tailed significance)] are given. Only significant results (P < 0.05) are presented.

Discussion

Overall, our results revealed that smaller individuals show lower fecundity, lower lipid content and a higher intensity of certain parasites (Fig. 8), which in some cases (e.g. certain digeneans and nematodes) are negatively related to the energy reserves of the host. As it has been shown that smaller individuals now predominate in the population (Van Beveren et al., 2014), the relationships found in the present study might indicate that the fecundity and health status of the anchovies from the northwestern Mediterranean stock are currently impaired.

Figure 8:

Figure 8:

Possible implications for the health of the anchovy stock in a hypothetical scenario in which there is an increase in the median size of anchovy.

The results of the present study also show that the spawning season of the European anchovy in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea takes place between April and August, which is consistent with what has been reported by other authors for other regions of the Mediterranean Sea (Tsikliras et al., 2010). The values of fecundity reported in the present study are also coherent with other studies carried out with the European anchovy in the Adriatic Sea (Casavola et al., 1996) or in the northeast Atlantic Ocean (Sanz and Uriarte, 1989; Motos, 1996). The batch fecundity was positively related to total length, which means that larger individuals have a higher reproductive capacity than smaller ones, as is commonly the case with several northwestern Mediterranean commercial fish species (Muñoz et al., 2005; Ferrer-Maza et al., 2014, 2015; Villegas-Hernández et al., 2014, 2015a,b). In the present study, the size of all the immature anchovy specimens we examined exceeded 9 cm, which is currently the minimal landing size for anchovy in the Mediterranean Sea. As suggested by Tsikliras and Stergiou (2014), an increase in the minimal landing size would be more appropriate in order to ensure the recruitment of this species. Indeed, our results suggest that a hypothetical increase in the minimal landing size might not only contribute to allowing juveniles to reach sexual maturity but would also be associated with an increase in the average fecundity of spawners. Furthermore, the absence of a relationship between batch fecundity and energy reserves seems to indicate that the size of anchovy has a greater influence than the condition of the fish on the reproductive potential of this species.

In relationship to energy reserves, the results showed that because the stock currently consists mostly of small individuals (Van Beveren et al., 2014), the energy reserves of individual anchovies and of the whole population are low. We identified two different groups according to the size of the individuals: those larger than 12.5 cm showed strong variations in lipid content in the muscle, whereas all individuals below this size had low energy reserves. These findings are in accordance with the aforementioned work by Van Beveren et al. (2014), who produced a comprehensive study using an extensive and reliable data time series (1992–2012) that was compiled from scientific surveys. They found that although the abundance of anchovy had remained relatively high, its biomass and mean size had declined dramatically. According to the authors, the median length for the whole data set was 12.5 cm and the size distribution remained fairly constant from 1992 until 2005, whereupon a sudden shift towards larger individuals was detected. During the following years, a decline in size took place, with the result that the median fish size of the anchovy population of the last 4 years (2009–2012) was smaller than in all preceding years. Furthermore, during this later period, 2009–2012, the analysis of the relative condition factor also indicated that the condition of the anchovies was poor. It seems, therefore, that size and condition are linked and that there is a shift in the energy reserves of anchovies at median lengths of ∼12.5 cm. It should also be noted that these changes in energy reserves are not attributable to the reproductive status of the specimens, because our results showed that there was no depletion of lipids that correlated with the spawning season, i.e. from developing to regressing phases, which is probably because anchovy in the Mediterranean Sea continue feeding during their spawning season (Costalago et al., 2012; Nikolioudakis et al., 2014). Consequently, it can be assumed that, in terms of condition, the state of the stock is better when the median length of the individuals is >12.5 cm because specimens below this size have low energy reserves, which are essential for growing or maintaining fitness during reproduction. Therefore, we may hypothesize that in a potential scenario in which the anchovies can grow to a larger size before they are caught, the overall state of the stock in terms of fecundity, energy reserves and parasitism could improve (Fig. 8).

An accessory result concerning energy reserves is the clear relationship between lipid content in muscle and the mesenteric fat stage using the method proposed by van der Lingen and Hutchings (2005). We therefore consider that the mesenteric fat stage is a good indicator of energy reserves in European anchovy in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea, and we support the incorporation of this cheap, quick and easy method for estimating anchovy energy reserves into other pelagic fish surveys.

Our results on parasitism showed that the metazoan parasite fauna of anchovy in the northwestern Mediterranean is dominated by digeneans and nematodes, most of them in larval stages. Although some parasites (A. stossichi, the hemiurid metacercariae and H. aduncum) were more prevalent in immature and regenerating specimens, no difference in the median intensity of infection was found during the different ovarian developmental phases. It appears, therefore, that the reproductive status of females during the spawning season does not significantly affect the parasite load. However, another explanation could be that only the healthier individuals are surviving the energy-demanding spawning season. It must be considered that the present study was carried out with wild-caught specimens, and we do not know whether parasitism is effectively causing the death of the individuals with heaviest parasite burdens during the spawning season.

In contrast, individual intensities of parasitism showed that smaller anchovy specimens harboured more parasites (A. stossichi, the hemiurid metacercariae and H. aduncum) than larger specimens. Conversely, our results also showed that higher intensities of didymozoid metacercariae were found in larger anchovies. There is little research available concerning most of the various parasites that infect anchovy in the Mediterranean Sea, with the exception of nematode infection, on which there is a wide range of research. Indeed, because anisakid nematodes are involved in a disease that affects humans, i.e. anisakidosis, there is a considerable amount of literature concerning infections by these nematodes in anchovy (e.g. Rello et al., 2009; Gutiérrez-Galindo et al., 2010; De Liberato et al., 2013; Serracca et al., 2014). Such studies have reported values of prevalence ranging from 0 to 25%, which is in accordance with our results (H. aduncum PP = 18.08% and Anisakis sp. PP = 4.06%). However, one study carried out in the Adriatic Sea (Mladineo et al., 2012) found a 76% prevalence of Anisakis pegreffii infection in anchovy, which is much higher than any of the prevalences reported in others parts of the Mediterranean Sea. In contrast to our study, Mladineo et al. (2012) reported a positive relationship between anchovy length and the intensity of infection by Anisakis pegreffii. However, Rello et al. (2009) and De Liberato et al. (2013) found no significant correlation between length and intensity of infection. In any case, there appear to be significant differences between different areas of the Mediterranean in the prevalence and intensity of anisakid nematodes, which depends on the abundance of their intermediate and/or definitive hosts (Rello et al., 2009).

The results of the present study indicate that the digenean A. stossichi, the hemiurid metacercariae and some unidentified nematode larvae could be affecting the energy reserves of anchovy negatively. This interpretation is reinforced by our results that showed that there was no depletion of lipids that correlated with the spawning season (developing, spawning capable, actively spawning or regressing phases). Therefore, we can hypothesize that the observed differences in the energy reserves could be due to the effect of parasitism rather than that of reproduction. Although most of the relationships were negative, we also found a positive relationship between Anisakis sp. and energy reserves, which showed that the impact of parasites is not always evident and straightforward. It should be noted that other biotic and abiotic factors, particularly food availability, can also influence anchovy condition. For example, Brosset et al. (2015) demonstrated that the concentration of mesozooplankton has a significant positive influence on anchovy condition in the Gulf of Lion. However, negative effects of nematodes on anchovy energy reserves have also been reported by Shchepkina (1985), who analysed the lipid concentration in the liver and the white and red muscles of anchovy in the Black Sea and found that specimens that were heavily infected by nematodes showed lower lipid concentrations (especially triglycerides) in their tissues than lightly infected specimens.

It appears that A. stossichi and H. aduncum have a negative relationship with female egg production, whereas the didymozoid metacercariae is positively related. However, these results must be interpreted with caution. It is more likely that these differences in fecundity are attributable to anchovy length rather than parasitism. Indeed, as previously reported, anchovy length is a good indicator of the individual’s fecundity because there is a significant positive relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, when anchovy length vs. individual intensity of infection was analysed, smaller anchovies were found to have more A. stossichi and H. aduncum, whereas larger anchovies had more didymozoid metacercariae. Therefore, we consider that metazoan parasitism does not significantly affect the fecundity of female anchovies and that the variations we found were because of the influence of body length.

Taken together, our results reveal that the current prevalence of smaller individuals in the northwestern Mediterranean anchovy stock might have several consequences for the health of the stock as a whole, because they have lower fecundity, lower lipid content and higher intensity of certain parasites. We think that the correlations between anchovy size, fecundity, energy reserves and metazoan parasitism found in the present study should be taken into consideration in the management of the European anchovy. Our results can be useful not only because of the economic and ecological implications of further deterioration in anchovy stocks but also for the implications on human health; bigger individuals provide consumers with greater nutritional benefits (more fish oil) and fewer health risks (fewer parasites). In any case, despite the fact that the relationships found in the present study between parasitism, condition and reproduction indicate that there is a link between these parameters, the cause–effect relationships still remain unknown. Therefore, we consider that further research, especially experimental studies that consider other endogenous and exogenous factors that could produce additive, synergistic or antagonistic effects on fish condition and reproduction, should be undertaken to gain a better understanding of the links between fish health and reproduction.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (research project ref. CTM2009-08602). D.F.-M. benefited from a Formación de Personal Investigador predoctoral fellowship (ref. BES-2010-032618) and J.L. benefited from a ‘Ramón y Cajal’ research contract from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to our colleagues at the University of Girona (Animal Biology–Ichthyology Research Group) for their valuable collaboration in the laboratory work. We also thank R. A. Bray (Natural History Museum, London) for his kind help with the digenean identification and an anonymous referee for his helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

References

  1. Alday A, Santos M, Uriarte A, Martín I, Martínez U, Motos L (2010) Revision of criteria for the classification of postovulatory follicles degeneration, for the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.). Rev Investig Mar 17: 165–171. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagamian KH, Heins DC, Baker JA (2004) Body condition and reproductive capacity of three-spined stickleback infected with the cestode Schistocephalus solidus. J Fish Biol 64: 1568–1576. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barber I, Svensson PA (2003) Effects of experimental Schistocephalus solidus infections on growth, morphology and sexual development of female three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Parasitology 126: 359–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bean MG, Bonner TH (2009) Impact of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) on Cyprinella lutrensis condition and reproduction. J Freshw Ecol 24: 383–391. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benaglia T, Chauveau D, Hunter DR, Young DS (2009) mixtools: an R package for analyzing finite mixture models. J Stat Softw 32: 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bray RA, Gibson DI, Jones A (2008) Keys to the Trematoda, Vol 3. CAB International, Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brosset P, Ménard F, Fromentin J, Bonhommeau S, Ulses C, Bourdeix J, Bigot J, Van Beveren E, Roos D, Saraux C (2015) Influence of environmental variability and age on the body condition of small pelagic fish in the Gulf of Lions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 529: 219–231. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown-Peterson NJ, Wyanski DM, Saborido-Rey F, Macewicz BJ, Lowerre-Barbieri SK (2011) A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Mar Coast Fish 3: 52–70. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83: 575–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Casavola N, Marano G, Rizzi E (1996) Batch fecundity of Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the south-western Adriatic sea. Sci Mar 60: 369–377. [Google Scholar]
  12. Costalago D, Navarro J, Álvarez-Calleja I, Palomera I (2012) Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in the feeding habits and trophic levels of two small pelagic fish species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 460: 169–181. [Google Scholar]
  13. De Liberato C, Bossù T, Scaramozzino P, Nicolini G, Ceddia P, Mallozzi S, Cavallero S, D’Amelio S (2013) Presence of anisakid larvae in the European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus, fished off the Tyrrhenian coast of central Italy. J Food Prot 76: 1643–1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014. FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferrer-Maza D, Lloret J, Muñoz M, Faliex E, Vila S, Sasal P (2014) Parasitism, condition and reproduction of the European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 71: 1088–1099. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferrer-Maza D, Muñoz M, Lloret J, Faliex E, Vila S, Sasal P (2015) Health and reproduction of red mullet, Mullus barbatus, in the western Mediterranean Sea. Hydrobiologia 753: 189–204. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fischer W, Schneider M, Bauchot ML (1987) Fiches FAO D’identification des Espèces pour les Besoins de la Peche. Mediterranée et Mer Noire. Zone de Peche 37. Vol II: Vertébrés. FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ganias K, Somarakis S, Nunes C (2014) Reproductive potential. In Ganias K, eds, Biology and Ecology of Sardines and Anchovies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 79–121. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibson DI, Jones A, Bray RA (2002) Keys to the Trematoda, Vol 1, Ed 1a CAB International, Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gutiérrez-Galindo JF, Osanz-Mur AC, Mora-Ventura MT (2010) Occurrence and infection dynamics of anisakid larvae in Scomber scombrus, Trachurus trachurus, Sardina pilchardus, and Engraulis encrasicolus from Tarragona (NE Spain). Food Control 21: 1550–1555. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hunter JR, Lo NCH, Leong RJH (1985) Batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes. In Lasker R, eds, An Egg Production Method for Estimating Spawning Biomass of Pelagic Fish: Application to the Northern Anchovy, Engraulis Mordax. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 36, pp 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones A, Bray RA, Gibson DI (2005) Keys to the Trematoda, Vol 2, Ed 1a CAB International, Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lleonart J, Maynou F (2003) Fish stock assessments in the Mediterranean: state of the art. Sci Mar 67: 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lloret J, Palomera I, Salat J, Sole I (2004) Impact of freshwater input and wind on landings of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in shelf waters surrounding the Ebre (Ebro) River delta (north-western Mediterranean). Fish Oceanogr 13: 102–110. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lloret J, Faliex E, Shulman GE, Raga JA, Sasal P, Muñoz M, Casadevall M, Ahuir-Baraja AE, Montero FE, Repullés-Albelda A et al. (2012) Fish health and fisheries, implications for stock assessment and management: the Mediterranean example. Rev Fish Sci 20: 165–180. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lloret J, Shulman G, Love RM (2014) Condition and Health Indicators of Exploited Marine Fishes. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Barbieri LR (1993) A new method of oocyte separation and preservation for fish reproduction studies. Fish Bull 91: 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  28. Martín P, Sabatés A, Lloret J, Martin-Vide J (2012) Climate modulation of fish populations: the role of the Western Mediterranean Oscillation (WeMO) in sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) production in the north-western Mediterranean. Clim Change 110: 925–939. [Google Scholar]
  29. Melo YC. (1992) The biology of the anchovy Engraulis capensis in the Benguela Current region. PhD thesis. University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mladineo I, Simat V, Miletić J, Beck R, Poljak V (2012) Molecular identification and population dynamic of Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae Dujardin, 1845) isolated from the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) in the Adriatic Sea. Int J Food Microbiol 157: 224–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moravec F. (2007) Some aspects of the taxonomy and biology of adult spirurine nematodes parasitic in fishes: a review. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 54: 239–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Motos L. (1996) Reproductive biology and fecundity of the Bay of Biscay anchovy population (Engraulis encrasicolus L.). Sci Mar 60: 195–207. [Google Scholar]
  33. Muñoz M, Sàbat M, Vila S, Casadevall M (2005) Annual reproductive cycle and fecundity of Scorpaena notata (Teleostei: Scorpaenidae). Sci Mar 69: 555–562. [Google Scholar]
  34. Muñoz M, Dimitriadis C, Casadevall M, Vila S, Delgado E, Lloret J, Saborido-Rey F (2010) Female reproductive biology of the bluemouth Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus: spawning and fecundity. J Fish Biol 77: 2423–2442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nikolioudakis N, Isari S, Somarakis S (2014) Trophodynamics of anchovy in a non-upwelling system: direct comparison with sardine. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 500: 215–229. [Google Scholar]
  36. Palomera I, Tejeiro B, Alemany X (2003) Size at first maturity of the NW Mediterranean anchovy. In Document presented to the GFCM-SAC Sub-Committee on Stock Assessment Working Group on Small Pelagic Species, Tanger, Morocco, March 2003, 6 pp. [Google Scholar]
  37. Palomera I, Olivar MP, Salat J, Sabatés A, Coll M, García A, Morales-Nin B (2007) Small pelagic fish in the NW Mediterranean Sea: an ecological review. Prog Oceanogr 74: 377–396. [Google Scholar]
  38. Petter AJ, Maillard C (1988) Larval Ascarids parasites of fishes from western Mediterranean sea. Bull du Muséum Natl d’Histoire Nat Sect A, Zool Biol Écologie Anim 10: 347–369. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pita C, Silva A, Prellezo R, Andrés M, Uriarte A (2014) Socioeconomics and management. In Ganias K, eds, Biology and Ecology of Sardines and Anchovies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 335–366. [Google Scholar]
  40. Reiczigel J, Rózsa L (2005) Quantitative Parasitology 3.0. Budapest. Distributed by the authors. http://www.zoologia.hu/qp/qp.html. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rello FJ, Adroher FJ, Benítez R, Valero A (2009) The fishing area as a possible indicator of the infection by anisakids in anchovies (Engraulis encrasicolus) from southwestern Europe. Int J Food Microbiol 129: 277–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rózsa L, Reiczigel J, Majoros G (2000) Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. J Parasitol 86: 228–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sanz A, Uriarte A (1989) Reproductive cycle and batch fecundity of the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicholus) in 1987. Calif Coop Ocean Fish Investig Reports 30: 127–135.
  44. Serracca L, Battistini R, Rossini I, Carducci A, Verani M, Prearo M, Tomei L, De Montis G, Ercolini C (2014) Food safety considerations in relation to Anisakis pegreffii in anchovies (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardines (Sardina pilchardus) fished off the Ligurian Coast (Cinque Terre National Park, NW Mediterranean). Int J Food Microbiol 190: 79–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shahidi F. (2001) Extraction and measurement of total lipids. In Wrolstad RE, eds, Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shchepkina AM. (1985) The influence of helminths on the tissue lipid content of Black Sea anchovy, Engraulis encrasicholus ponticus, and bullhead, Neogobius melanostomus, during the annual cycle. In Hargis WJ, eds, Parasitology and Pathology of Marine Organisms of the World Ocean. NOAA Technical Report NMFS25. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Springfield, USA, pp 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsikliras AC, Stergiou KI (2014) Size at maturity of Mediterranean marine fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24: 219–268. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsikliras AC, Antonopoulou E, Stergiou KI (2010) Spawning period of Mediterranean marine fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 20: 499–538. [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Beveren E, Bonhommeau S, Fromentin J-M, Bigot J-L, Bourdeix J-H, Brosset P, Roos D, Saraux C (2014) Rapid changes in growth, condition, size and age of small pelagic fish in the Mediterranean. Mar Biol 161: 1809–1822. [Google Scholar]
  50. van der Lingen CD, Hutchings L (2005) Estimating the lipid content of pelagic fish in the southern Benguela by visual assessment of their mesenteric fat. African J Mar Sci 27: 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  51. Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM (2005) Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108: 643–647. [Google Scholar]
  52. Villegas-Hernández H, Muñoz M, Lloret J (2014) Life-history traits of temperate and thermophilic barracudas (Teleostei: Sphyraenidae) in the context of sea warming in the Mediterranean Sea. J Fish Biol 84: 1940–1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Villegas-Hernández H, Lloret J, Muñoz M (2015a) Reproduction, condition and abundance of the Mediterranean bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) in the context of sea warming. Fish Oceanogr 24: 42–56. [Google Scholar]
  54. Villegas-Hernández H, Lloret J, Muñoz M (2015b) Climate-driven changes in life-history traits of the bastard grunt Pomadasys incisus (Teleostei: Haemulidae) in the north-western Mediterranean. Mediterr Mar Sci 16: 21–30. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Conservation Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES