Skip to main content
Chinese Medical Journal logoLink to Chinese Medical Journal
. 2015 Jul 5;128(13):1761–1764. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.159350

The Natural Progression of Parkinson's Disease in a Small Cohort with 15 Drug-naïve Patients

Ying Liu 1, Jin-Hu Fan 2, Xiang Gao 3,4, Li Ma 5,, You-Lin Qiao 2, Lin Zhang 6
PMCID: PMC4733712  PMID: 26112717

Abstract

Background:

The studies of the natural progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) in Chinese populations have been lacking. To address this issue and obtain a preliminary data, we conducted a PD progression assessment in 15 adults with de novo PD from a nutritional intervention trial (NIT) cohort in Lin County China.

Methods:

Using the Copiah County screening questionnaire and United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank diagnostic criteria, we surveyed the available NIT cohort members in 2000 and diagnosed 86 patients as PD. In 2010, we resurveyed all PD patients and confirmed definite PD diagnosis in 15 cases with the rest of them being dead (54); having probable (10) PD or vascular Parkinsonism (3); refusing to participate (2); or being away (2). In both surveys, we used Hoehn and Yahr (HY) scale and assessed the disease progression. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was added to the second survey.

Results:

In 2010, the average disease duration for 15 definite PD patients was 13.6 ± 7.3 years. Over a 10-year time span, 9 out of 15 patients remained at the same HY stage while the remaining 6 progressed. Rigidity (47% vs. 100%; P = 0.002) and postural instability (7% vs. 47%; P = 0.005) worsened significantly. The mean UPDRS motor scores in 2010 were 39.4 ± 23.7.

Conclusions:

Overall worsening of motor function in PD seems to be the rule in this untreated cohort, and their rate of progression seemed to be slower than those reported in the western populations.

Keywords: Drug-naïve, Epidemiology, Parkinson's Disease, Progression

INTRODUCTION

It has been well-documented that the neuropathologic process in Parkinson's disease (PD) involves the loss of the nigral dopaminergic neurons and dopaminergic nerve terminals in the striatum.[1] The duration of the PD prodrome has been estimated ranging from 2 to 50 years depending on the clinical feature in question, duration of follow-up, accuracy of diagnosis, age of onset, and gender.[2] Although the first appearance of motor signs requires the loss of at least 50% dopamine neurons in substantia nigra,[1,3,4] studies of the prelevodopa era were not able to provide details on the rate of progression of motor impairment using validated scores or rating scales.[5,6] More recent studies, however, showed that latencies to Hoehn and Yahr (HY) Stage IV and V could last for up to 40 years[6,7] attributing to the advent of effective symptomatic therapies with dopaminergic agents, seemingly delaying the progression of disabilities in PD.

Whereas studies from the west provided limited guidelines to characterize the natural progression of PD in population residing in countries of eastern hemisphere, researchers in this field have dealt with the lack of population-based measurements in de novo cohorts in China for the past several decades. To explore the natural progression of PD in Chinese people, we conducted a preliminary study among a small cohort from a well-defined nutritional intervention trial (NIT) in Lin County China.[8,9,10,11]

METHODS

Study population

In 2000, we screened and diagnosed PD cases among NIT cohort members who were available in the follow-up studies.[10,11] NIT was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the benefits of multiple antioxidants in the primary prevention of gastrointestinal cancers in Lin County from 1986 to 1991.[8,9] The initial participants were adults aged between 40 and 69 with no history of malignancy or other debilitating disease or taking any vitamin, mineral supplements regularly, or were taking specific medications when entered the NIT study. For the current study, additionally, the subjects had to reside in one of the four communes of Lin County 4 days/week or 6 months/year. In 2010, we conducted a second survey among the participants who were identified in 2000 as PD cases to verify their diagnosis and evaluate disease progression.

Informed consent was obtained from all participants during the two surveys. The Human Subjects Review Board of the Chinese Cancer Institute Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences approved this substudy.

The first survey

Ascertainment of PD cases in the NIT was reported elsewhere.[10] Briefly, potential PD cases were identified using a PD symptom screener, (Copiah County Questionnaire),[12,13] and subsequently examined by a study neurologist. For those who were either screened positive or suspected having Parkinsonism at the end of the neurological examination were further evaluated and diagnosed with the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank (UKPDSBB) diagnostic criteria.[14] At the end of the first survey, 86 participants were diagnosed as PD and were visited by a senior neurologist for further treatment and prevention at the local health stations or in their homes. The age groups, gender, and the cardinal features are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the PD cases identified during the first survey and the second survey (n (%))

Characteristics The first survey (n = 86) The second survey (n = 15)
Age (years)
 50–59 6 (7) 3 (20)
 60–69 42 (49) 8 (53)
 70–79 32 (37) 4 (27)
 ≥80 6 (7) 0 (0)
Gender
 Female 45 (52) 6 (40)
 Male 41 (48) 9 (60)
Cardinal features
 Bradykinesia 86 (100) 15 (100)
 Resting tremor 83 (97) 13 (87)
 Rigidity 49 (57) 7 (47)
 Postural instability 26 (30) 1 (7)
HY stage
 1 14 (16) 4 (27)
 2 54 (63) 10 (67)
 3 18 (21) 1 (7)

Among PD patients during the first survey, none of them had HY Stage VI or V; the cardinal features are representative of classic PD clinical features as are defined in UPDRS motor scale. PD: Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; HY: Hoehn and Yahr.

The second survey

In 2010, we revisited all available PD patients in their homes. In this survey, we confirmed PD diagnosis and assessed their disease progression. To confirm PD diagnosis, individuals who were diagnosed in 2000 underwent a detailed neurological examination by study neurologists according to a standardized diagnostic protocol which was used in the previous survey.[10] The protocol was comprised of a neurological history and a detailed examination. To establish the diagnosis of idiopathic PD, in addition to the accurate history, examination and medical records, UKPDSBB clinical diagnostic criteria was still applied. Those participants who did not meet the full clinical diagnostic criteria or was clearly due to some other causes were given the diagnoses of probable PD, vascular Parkinsonism (VPD) or drug-induced Parkinsonism.[15]

We assessed PD progression using HY scale, which was also applied in the first survey. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)[16] part III, motor score was added in this section to further characterize the Parkinsonian features of these treatment-naïve patients.

Among 86 PD patients diagnosed during the first survey, only 28 were available for reexamination with 15 (9 men and 6 women) confirmed of PD diagnosis, and 10 probable PD, 3 VPD in 2010. For the rest 58 patients, 54 deceased at the time of second survey (22 died of stroke, 10 cancer, 17 cardiovascular disease, and 5 nonspecified illnesses), 2 refused to participate, and 2 were out of the county.

We provided health care information and dispatched medicine (including artane and carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone) to the patients diagnosed as PD or probable PD in the two surveys. Due to economic limitations, these 15 patients refused to take any anti-Parkinsonism medication, and we have confirmed this with the patients, their relatives, and the village doctors.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., USA). Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median (ranges). Mean values were compared using the paired t-test. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables which were presented as proportions (frequency %). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 15 study patients was 61.1 ± 10.3 years at the symptom onset and 75.2 ± 6.6 years in 2010. Their mean disease duration was 13.6 ± 7.3 years in 2010. The mean mini-mental state examination and activities of daily living scales were 23 ± 3 and 13 ± 4 in 2000 and 21 ± 5 and 15 ± 3 in 2010 respectively.

The clinical features of the 15 patients are summarized in Table 2. Thirteen patients (87%, 13/15) were tremor dominant. As to the motor functions, all patients presented with bradykinesias at study entry whereas only fewer than half of them had rigidity (47% vs. 100%; P = 0.002;). Resting tremor, on the other hand, was present in the majority of the patients initially with some noticeable increase in prevalence ten years later (87% vs. 93%; P = 0.960). These discrepancies were primarily technical as the result of the way UKPDSBB was set up. Postural instability was only present in one patient at the initial assessment and became much more prevalent 10 years later (7% vs. 47%; P = 0.005; Table 2). The mean UPDRS motor scores in 2010 were 39.4 ± 23.7 for total and 10.1 ± 7.4 for tremor scores (item 20 and 21); 5.8 ± 5.2 for rigidity (item 22); 16.8 ± 9.0 for bradykinesia (item 23–27; and 31).

Table 2.

Disease progression among the 15 PD patients (2000–2010)

Clinical features 2000 2010 χ2/t value P
Resting tremor, % 87 93 0.003 0.960
Rigidity % 47 100 9.886 0.002
Bradykinesia, % 100 100 NA NA
Postural instability, % 7 47 8.612 0.005
UPDRS III total 39.4 ± 23.7
UPDRS–tremor 10.1 ± 7.4
UPDRS–rigidity 5.8 ± 5.2
UPDRS–bradykinesia 16.8 ± 9.0
HY stage 1.8 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 1.1 1.835 0.088

UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; HY: Hoehn and Yahr; PD: Parkinson’s disease. NA: Not applicable. “-”: data not collected.

As to the HY staging, over a 10-year time span, 9 patients remained at the same stages while 6 progressed (1.5 in 2000 vs. 3 in 2010, t = 2.278, P = 0.039). At the beginning of the study, most of the patients were at a lower stage, averaging 1.8. Ten years later, they deteriorated to 2.4, giving an overall slow progression (P = 0.088). It took the 15 patients 13.6 ± 5.9 years to reach the HY stages 2.4 and UPDRS motor scores 39.4 ± 23.7.

DISCUSSION

This study represents one of the first attempts in understanding the natural progression of PD in treatment-naïve Chinese patients, underpinning the importance of addressing the disease progression without being confounded by dopaminergic interventions. In contrast, most of previous work on PD progression in other parts of the world involved patients having received levodopa therapy,[17,18,19,20,21,22,23] potentially biasing objective interpretation.

The impact of levodopa on PD progression remains controversial. While some argue that levodopa may slow down its progression;[17,18,19] some do not believe that dopaminergic intervention can alter the course of progression over the long run;[22,23] and others insist that levodopa hasten the overall deterioration.[18,19] For instance, Maier-Hoehn back in 1983 reported that levodopa reduced the number of patients in HY Stage IV or V (or death) per 5-year period of disease duration by 30–50%[24] as opposed to the more recent report suggesting that rapid progression was positively associated with levodopa use.[20,21] While it was not our intention to draw head to head comparison with these contributions, we believe the current study could re-fuel the debate on the long-term outcome of levodopa therapy, and provide a useful reference to study PD progression and to understand the role of levodopa in this process.

The current study measured the mean disease duration, which, when calculated against the change of HY scales, provides an effective way of gauging the rate of progression. When compared with other cohorts in other parts of the world [Table 3], the patients in the current study showed a slower progression. In addition, patients’ HY stage in our study deteriorated < 1 stage in 10 years, which was much slower than that were described by Hoehn and Yahr.[25] who reported that without treatment, the median time taken to progress from Stage I to Stages IV and V is 9.0 ± 7.2 and 14.0 ± 3.4 years, respectively, and Marttila and Rinne reported that progression to Stage V occurred 10 years after disease onset.[26] As shown in Table 3, our patients seemed to have similar HY stages[27,28,29] with longer duration or similar disease duration but lower HY stages.[30]

Table 3.

Comparison of UPDRS motor scores and HY stage scores among current study and other selected studies published

Regions Case size (n) UPDRS motor score HY stages Disease duration (years) Studies
Lin County, China 15 39.4 ± 23.7 2.4 ± 1.1 13.6 ± 7.3 Zhang et al.
Kobe, Japan[27] 153 34 ± 16 3.0 ± 0.7 5.9 ± 2.4 Abe et al.
Miami, Florida[28] 44 21.7 ± 9.8 2.3 ± 0.7 9.0 ± 5.4 Papapetropoulos et al.
London, UK[30] 76 N 4.3 12.8 Hughes et al.
Fukushima, Japan[31] 13 39.1 ± 14.2 N 6.1 ± 5.7 Saito et al.
Tyne Wear, UK[32] 109 34.1 ± 11.2 2.0 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 6.1 Graham and Sagar

N: No data reported; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; HY: Hoehn and Yahr.

As to the UPDRS measurements, in the current cohort of 15 cases, the mean motor score reached 39.4 ± 23.7 at the end of the 13-year duration [Table 3]. In comparison, it took only 6 years to reach the same range of UPDRS score for Japanese cohort.[31] These observations provided additional support to the notion that our cohort may have progressed at a slower pace. While the potential reasons for this discrepancy remain uncertain, variability among Asian population from different countries may reflect the impact of other epidemiological factors such as diet, environment, or other population-based differences.

The limitations of this study were as follows: 1. Due to the fact that only a few patients refused to take medicine, this study was a small cohort with just 15 patients. If possible, we should observe the natural progression of PD in a larger cohort; 2. Only individuals from the NIT cohort were surveyed in the current study. This makes it difficult to directly compare our results to other studies. Ideally, we should have conducted simultaneous assessments of PD progression in non-NIT participating Lin County residents and in one of the nutritionally adequate counties in the same geographical region.

The current report represents the first step in addressing the natural progression of PD in rural China. Future studies in this direction will undoubtedly expand on our initial investigation, leading to more extensive studies in both rural and urban population in China, ideally prospectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank all the local field investigators and village doctors for their following up and collecting the medical information among the study cohort. The authors also thank all the individuals who participated in our study.

Footnotes

Edited by: Yuan-Yuan Ji

Source of Support: This study was supported in part by NIH contract (No. NHHSN261200477001C) with the Cancer Institute of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; by funds from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81200989); by additional funds from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; by funds from the Intramural Research Program of the US National Cancer Institute, NIH and finally, funds from the NIH Fogarty International Center Grant (No. 5R25TW009340).

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Weintraub D, Comella CL, Horn S. Parkinson's disease – Part 1: Pathophysiology, symptoms, burden, diagnosis, and assessment. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14 2 Suppl:S40–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hawkes CH. The prodromal phase of sporadic Parkinson's disease: Does it exist and if so how long is it? Mov Disord. 2008;23:1799–807. doi: 10.1002/mds.22242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McNaught KS, Olanow CW. Protein aggregation in the pathogenesis of familial and sporadic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:530–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Olanow CW. The pathogenesis of cell death in Parkinson's disease-2007. Mov Disord. 2007;22 Suppl 17:S335–42. doi: 10.1002/mds.21675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Müller J, Wenning GK, Jellinger K, McKee A, Poewe W, Litvan I. Progression of Hoehn and Yahr stages in Parkinsonian disorders: A clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 2000;55:888–91. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.6.888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Poewe W. The natural history of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 2006;253 Suppl 7:VII2–6. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-7002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lücking CB, Dürr A, Bonifati V, Vaughan J, De Michele G, Gasser T, et al. Association between early-onset Parkinson's disease and mutations in the parkin gene. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1560–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005253422103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Kamangar F, Fan JH, Abnet CC, Sun XD, et al. Total and cancer mortality after supplementation with vitamins and minerals: follow-up of the Linxian General Population Nutrition Intervention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:507–18. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mark SD, Wang W, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Li JY, Taylor PR, Wang GQ, et al. Do nutritional supplements lower the risk of stroke or hypertension? Epidemiology. 1998;9:9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang L, Nie ZY, Liu Y, Chen W, Xin SM, Sun XD, et al. The prevalence of PD in a nutritionally deficient rural population in China. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;112:29–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ma L, Zhang L, Gao XH, Chen W, Wu YP, Wang Y, et al. Dietary factors and smoking as risk factors for PD in a rural population in China: A nested case-control study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2006;113:278–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schoenberg BS, Anderson DW, Haerer AF. Prevalence of Parkinson's disease in the biracial population of Copiah County, Mississippi. Neurology. 1985;35:841–5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.6.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haerer AF, Anderson DW, Schoenberg BS. Functional disability associated with major neurologic disorders. Findings from the Copiah County Study. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:1000–3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520100022009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meara J, Bhowmick BK, Hobson P. Accuracy of diagnosis in patients with presumed Parkinson's disease. Age Ageing. 1999;28:99–102. doi: 10.1093/ageing/28.2.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson's Disease. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): Status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2003;18:738–50. doi: 10.1002/mds.10473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fahn S, Parkinson Study Group Does levodopa slow or hasten the rate of progression of Parkinson's disease? J Neurol. 2005;252 Suppl 4:IV37–42. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-4008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holford NH, Chan PL, Nutt JG, Kieburtz K, Shoulson I, Parkinson Study Group Disease progression and pharmacodynamics in Parkinson disease – Evidence for functional protection with levodopa and other treatments. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2006;33:281–311. doi: 10.1007/s10928-006-9012-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chan PL, Nutt JG, Holford NH. Levodopa slows progression of Parkinson's disease: External validation by clinical trial simulation. Pharm Res. 2007;24:791–802. doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-9202-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.López IC, Ruiz PJ, Del Pozo SV, Bernardos VS. Motor complications in Parkinson's disease: Ten year follow-up study. Mov Disord. 2010;25:2735–9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ferguson LW, Rajput ML, Muhajarine N, Shah SM, Rajput A. Clinical features at first visit and rapid disease progression in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14:431–5. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hely MA, Morris JG, Traficante R, Reid WG, O’Sullivan DJ, Williamson PM. The sydney multicentre study of Parkinson's disease: Progression and mortality at 10 years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67:300–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.3.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Müller J, Wenning GK, Verny M, McKee A, Chaudhuri KR, Jellinger K, et al. Progression of dysarthria and dysphagia in postmortem-confirmed parkinsonian disorders. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:259–64. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.2.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maier Hoehn MM. Parkinsonism treated with levodopa: Progression and mortality. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1983;19:253–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427–42. doi: 10.1212/wnl.17.5.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marttila RJ, Rinne UK. Disability and progression in Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 1977;56:159–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1977.tb01420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abe K, Uchida Y, Notani M. Camptocormia in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis 2010. 2010:pii. doi: 10.4061/2010/267640. 267640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Papapetropoulos S, Katzen HL, Scanlon BK, Guevara A, Singer C, Levin BE. Objective quantification of neuromotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: Implementation of a portable, computerized measurement tool. Parkinsons Dis 2010. 2010:760196. doi: 10.4061/2010/760196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gray WK, Hildreth A, Bilclough JA, Wood BH, Baker K, Walker RW. Physical assessment as a predictor of mortality in people with Parkinson's disease: A study over 7 years. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1934–40. doi: 10.1002/mds.22610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hughes AJ, Ben-Shlomo Y, Daniel SE, Lees AJ. What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson's disease: A clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 1992;42:1142–6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.6.1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saito N, Yamamoto T, Sugiura Y, Shimizu S, Shimizu M. Lifecorder: A new device for the long-term monitoring of motor activities for Parkinson's disease. Intern Med. 2004;43:685–92. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Graham JM, Sagar HJ. A data-driven approach to the study of heterogeneity in idiopathic Parkinson's disease: Identification of three distinct subtypes. Mov Disord. 1999;14:10–20. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(199901)14:1<10::aid-mds1005>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES