Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2016 Jan 28;90(4):2052–2063. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01801-15

Evolution of Newcastle Disease Virus Quasispecies Diversity and Enhanced Virulence after Passage through Chicken Air Sacs

Chunchun Meng 1, Xusheng Qiu 1, Shengqing Yu 1, Chuanfeng Li 1, Yingjie Sun 1, Zongyan Chen 1, Kaichun Liu 1, Xiangle Zhang 1, Lei Tan 1, Cuiping Song 1, Guangqing Liu 1, Chan Ding 1,
Editor: B Williams
PMCID: PMC4734012  PMID: 26656697

ABSTRACT

It has been reported that lentogenic Newcastle disease virus (NDV) isolates have the potential to become velogenic after their transmission and circulation in chickens, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. In this study, a highly velogenic NDV variant, JS10-A10, was generated from the duck-origin lentogenic isolate JS10 through 10 consecutive passages in chicken air sacs. The velogenic properties of this selected variant were determined using mean death time (MDT) assays, intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI), the intravenous pathogenicity index (IVPI), histopathology, and the analysis of host tissue tropism. In contrast, JS10 remained lentogenic after 20 serial passages in chicken eggs (JS10-E20). The JS10, JS10-A10, and JS10-E20 genomes were sequenced and found to be nearly identical, suggesting that both JS10-A10 and JS10-E20 were directly generated from JS10. To investigate the mechanism for virulence enhancement, the partial genome covering the F0 cleavage site of JS10 and its variants were analyzed using ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS) and the proportions of virulence-related genomes in the quasispecies were calculated. Velogenic NDV genomes accumulated as a function of JS10 passaging through chicken air sacs. Our data suggest that lentogenic NDV strains circulating among poultry might be a risk factor to future potential velogenic NDV outbreaks in chickens.

IMPORTANCE An avirulent isolate, JS10, was passaged through chicken air sacs and embryos, and the pathogenicity of the variants was assessed. A virulent variant, JS10-A10, was generated from consecutive passage in air sacs. We developed a deep-sequencing approach to detect low-frequency viral variants across the NDV genome. We observed that virulence enhancement of JS10 was due to the selective accumulation of velogenic quasispecies and the concomitant disappearance of lentogenic quasispecies. Our results suggest that because it is difficult to avoid contact between natural waterfowl reservoirs and sensitive poultry operations, circulating lentogenic NDV strains may represent a potential reservoir for emergent velogenic NDV strains that could cause outbreaks in chickens.

INTRODUCTION

Newcastle disease (ND) is one of the most serious infectious diseases of poultry. The causative agent of the disease is Newcastle disease virus (NDV), an enveloped virus belonging to the genus Avulavirus within the family Paramyxoviridae (1). NDV contains a single-stranded, negative-sense, nonsegmented genome of approximately 15.2 kb containing six genes that encode nucleocapsid protein (NP), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), fusion protein (F), hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase protein (L) (2). NDV strains are classified as highly virulent (velogenic), intermediately virulent (mesogenic), or nonvirulent (lentogenic) on the basis of their pathogenicity for chickens. The molecular basis for NDV pathogenicity is mainly the amino acid sequence of the cleavage site in the fusion (F0) protein. Lentogenic NDV strains contain dibasic residues at the cleavage sites 112E(G)RQE(G)RL117, which are sensitive only to the blood clotting factor Xa-like and which are limited to the respiratory and enteric tracts. In velogenic strains, F0 usually contains polybasic amino acids at the cleavage sites 112R(K)RQR(K)RF117, which are the preferred recognition sites for furin-like proteases present in most cells. F0 protein cleavage in a wide range of tissues is responsible for the systemic spread of velogenic NDV, as well as for its virulence (1, 3, 4).

Wild waterfowl are generally considered to be natural reservoirs of NDV, and the majority of the isolates are lentogenic or only potentially pathogenic (57). NDVs can be transmitted from wild waterfowl, via domestic waterfowl, to terrestrial poultry. A close phylogenetic relationship was found between numerous avirulent isolates obtained from live bird markets (LBMs) and wild birds, which suggests that NDVs were circulating in domestic poultry and wild birds (812). In eastern Asia, most domestic waterfowl are raised in semienclosed areas, which share ecological contact interfaces between wild aquatic birds and terrestrial poultry. Lentogenic NDVs can be isolated from apparently healthy domestic waterfowl that intermingled with terrestrial poultry. Thus, favorable natural conditions appear to exist for the generation of virulent NDV isolates (7, 1316).

RNA viruses exist in the host as a group of variants, known as a “quasispecies,” a concept considered to play a critical role in pathogenesis (1720). Phylogenetic analysis of NDV evolution showed that velogenic viruses likely emerged from a lentogenic progenitor virus via a change of two amino acids at the F0 cleavage site (21, 22). Subsequently, a reverse transcription real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that velogenic F0 sequences exist in lentogenic isolates (23). However, there is no detailed analysis of NDV quasispecies yet, and the relationship between emergent virulent strains and NDV quasispecies has not been clarified. Ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS) has emerged as an important tool with which to investigate viral diversity and to detect mutants in a group of quasispecies (2429).

To investigate the role of NDV evolution in virulence mechanisms, we passaged a domestic duck-origin lentogenic class I isolate, JS10, through chicken air sacs and embryos and then assessed the pathogenicity of the variants. UDPS was used to monitor changes to the virulence-related F0 cleavage site sequences, with the aim of establishing possible correlations between viral pathogenesis and quasispecies composition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Embryos and chickens.

Specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken eggs (White Leghorn) were obtained from Merial (Merial, Beijing, China), hatched in an incubator (Deguang, Shandong, China) in our laboratory, and used for experimentation following hatching. The chicks were housed in isolators under biosafety conditions and a 12-h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water until the days of the experiments. Care and maintenance of all animals were in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines set by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (permit numbers SHVRI-Po-0099 for virus air sac passaging, SHVRI-Po-0116 for virus pathogenicity index tests, SHVRI-Po-0120 for virus shedding and cohabitation infection examination, and SHVRI-Po-0142 for tissue tropism and histopathology determination). Before infection with live NDVs, birds were bled and the serum hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers were determined to confirm that the flock was negative for NDV antibodies. All inoculation experiments with live NDVs were conducted within the animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL3) facility in the Veterinary College of Yangzhou University.

Viruses and passage series.

A lentogenic NDV strain, Duck/JS/10 (JS10), was isolated from a nonvaccinated duck (30). After plaque purification three times on DF-1 cells, JS10 virus stock was prepared by inoculating 10-day-old SPF chicken embryos once and then sequentially passaged 10 times in air sacs of 3-day-old chicks or 20 times in 10-day-old chicken embryos as described previously (31, 32). Briefly, each caudal thoracic air sac of three chicks was inoculated with 0.2 ml of allantoic fluid containing 106 50% egg infectious doses (EID50) of the virus. The chicks from early passaging times (1 to 4 times) and moribund chicks from late passaging times (5 to 10 times) (clinical signs included diarrhea, rough hair coat, no eating or drinking, etc.) were sacrificed humanely with an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 100 mg/kg of body weight at day 4 or on days on which the clinical signs emerged postinfection, and air sacs were collected, homogenized, and pooled. Serial air sac passages in chicks (three birds per passage) were performed with 0.2 ml pooled air sac homogenate every 5 days. For passage in chicken embryos, an aliquot of 0.2 ml allantoic fluid containing 106 EID50 was inoculated into the allantoic cavity of three 10-day-old embryos. After incubation for 5 days (or until embryo death) at 37°C, the embryos were chilled, and the allantoic fluids were collected for the next passage. The generated isolates were named by the virus passage numbers and the organ in which they were propagated. For example, JS10-A10 indicates that the virus was passaged 10 times in the air sacs. All the viruses were propagated in the allantoic cavities of 10-day-old embryos only once. The allantoic fluid was harvested and stored at −80°C.

Pathogenicity index tests.

The mean death time (MDT; in hours) of chicken embryos at the minimum lethal dose, the intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) in 1-day-old SPF chicks, and the intravenous pathogenicity index (IVPI) in 6-week-old SPF chickens were determined to assess the virulence of the generated NDV variants. All the assays were performed as described in the OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (33).

Animal experiments.

To examine the pathogenicity of JS10 and its variants, 52 3-week-old SPF chickens were divided randomly into four groups of 13 chickens. Chickens in groups 1, 2, and 3 were inoculated nasally with JS10, JS10-A10, or JS10-E20 at 106 EID50. Chickens in group 4 were inoculated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a negative control. Five additional chickens were added to each isolator at 24 h postinfection (p.i.) to test the cohabitation infection. Following inoculation, chickens were monitored and recorded daily for up to 7 days for overt clinical signs of disease. Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected from all the birds at 2, 4, and 7 days postinfection (dpi) and tested for the presence of NDV as previously described (34). On day 3 p.i., three birds from each group were euthanized humanely and necropsied, gross lesions were recorded, and tissues (brain, lung, kidney, small intestine, and spleen) were collected for virologic and pathological examination. All the surviving chickens were euthanized with intravenous sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 100 mg/kg at the end of the experiment.

The tissue tropism of JS10 and its variants in chickens was detected through different inoculation routes. Another 12 groups of 3-week-old SPF chickens were inoculated orally, nasally, intravenously, and intramuscularly with JS10, JS10-A10, or JS10-E20 at 106 EID50. Organs (brain, trachea, lung, air sac, spleen, and intestine) were collected from infected chickens at 3 dpi after euthanization with intravenous sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 100 mg/kg for virus isolation and titration as previously described (35).

Whole-genome sequencing and analysis.

The genomes of JS10-A10 and JS10-E20 were sequenced and analyzed as described previously (30). Briefly, genomic RNA was extracted from virus-infected allantoic fluid with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and then cDNA synthesis was conducted using Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase. The complete genomes were sequenced using an overlap PCR strategy using 12 primer pairs that covered the entire genome. The 3′ and 5′ ends of the viral genome sequences were amplified using 3′ and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) according to the previous study. Sequence compilation, prediction of open reading frames (ORFs), and homology analysis were carried out using the Lasergene 7 (DNASTAR) software package (DNASTAR, Madison, WI).

UDPS of NDV partial genome covering F0 cleavage site.

Viral RNA was isolated from allantoic fluid containing viruses with the QIAamp viral RNA minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The same amount of RNA (100 ng) for each sample was used for cDNA synthesis, which was performed separately by using random hexamers, together with Superscript III reverse transcriptase, according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following first-strand synthesis, cDNA samples were used as the templates to generate UDPS amplicons. To minimize the error rate of the PCR process (false nucleotide substitutions), a high-fidelity polymerase, Pfu Ultra-II (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), was used. The study was designed for analysis of the amplicon at the maximum length of 400 nucleotides (nt) by the FLX+ platform. PCR primers were selected for amplification of a specific 387-bp NDV fragment, which included the F0 cleavage site. To compensate for random sampling and substitution errors, reverse transcription-PCRs (RT-PCRs) were performed in triplicate and then the reaction mixtures were mixed. Samples from mixed RT-PCR mixtures were treated with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to remove unincorporated deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and primers, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Purification was performed using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Quantification was performed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The emulsion PCR (emPCR) was performed with Roche GS FLX Titanium emPCR kits and the GS FLX Titanium sequencer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), with 5 × 1010 copies of DNA as the initial templates in each sample. To determine the error rate of the UDPS procedure, deep sequencing was conducted under similar conditions with a plasmid containing the JS10 sequence (JS10-P) that was prepared in our laboratory.

Sequence analysis.

The raw data were treated as described previously with minor refinements (36). Reads obtained from UDPS were demultiplexed corresponding to each sample combination of a multiplex identifier and primer to generate a FASTA file with each sample. These reads were subsequently processed by the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology pipeline. Sequences that were less than 300 or greater than 400 bp in length, contained incorrect primer sequences, or contained more than 10 ambiguous bases were discarded. In addition, an extra chimera-checking step against the default reference database was performed. The resulting sequences were aligned using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA-MEM, version 0.7.5a) (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net) to analyze the variation of all the sequenced bases that contained the NDV F0 cleavage site. In this step, any sequences containing insertion/deletion errors in this core domain were discarded.

Statistical analysis.

Virus titers were analyzed by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) in GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA); a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Those response variables were subjected to comparisons for all pairs by using the Tukey-Kramer test.

In UDPS, nucleotides 169 to 556 of the F gene, including cleavage sites of all valid sequence in each sample, were extracted from the alignment file and translated into amino acids by a script to compare the variation between JS10 and the variants. To obtain the percentage of amino acid variability in each sample, the total number of amino acid substitutions was divided by the total number of amino acids analyzed. According to the F0 cleavage site and phenotype, the variants were divided into three broad categories to statistically analyze the variability of the quasispecies. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine statistical differences in numerical variables.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The complete genomes of JS10-A10 and JS10-E20 were sequenced and submitted to the GenBank database (accession numbers KT124544 and KT124545).

RESULTS

JS10 virulence was enhanced during passaging in chick air sacs.

JS10 and its variant JS10-A3 induced no clinical signs or mortality after inoculation into chickens. However, variant JS10-A6 induced clinical signs of illness, such as mouth breathing and lethargy, and variant JS10-A10 produced 100% mortality within 48 h p.i. In contrast, no clinical signs or death was recorded in any case when JS10 was passaged in embryos 20 times (JS10E1 to JS10E20). These findings demonstrate that lentogenic NDVs in domestic waterfowl became highly pathogenic after consecutive passages in chicken air sacs. When the viruses were passaged in embryos, however, no changes in pathogenesis were observed. In addition, no cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed in JS10- or JS10-E20-infected cells; however, effacement and syncytia were observed in JS10-A10-infected cells on day 3 p.i. During the passage, the hemagglutinin (HA) and EID50 titers of all the generated variants showed no significant difference, indicating that virus replication was not altered.

Determination of the virus pathogenicity.

MDT, ICPI, and IVPI values were determined to quantify the virulence of selected viral variants. No significant changes were observed in MDT and IVPI between JS10 and JS10-A3, but ICPI values for JS10 and JS10-A3 were determined as 0.13 and 0.76, respectively, indicating that the virulence of JS10-A3 increased. The pathogenicity index increased significantly as a function of additional air sac passages (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Determination of virus pathogenicity

Straina MDTb (h) ICPIc IVPId
Duck/JS/10 ≥120 0.13 0
Duck/JS/10-A3 109 0.76 0.69
Duck/JS/10-A6 72.8 1.75 1.26
Duck/JS/10-A10 48.4 1.91 2.08
Duck/JS/10-E10 ≥120 0 0
Duck/JS/10-E20 ≥120 0 0
a

Newcastle disease virus original isolate and its variants.

b

Mean death time for chicken embryos infected with a single minimal lethal dose of virus.

c

Intracerebral pathogenicity index in 1-day-old chicks.

d

Intravenous pathogenicity index in 6-week-old chickens.

No enhancement of virulence was observed when JS10 was passaged in chicken embryos. Indeed, JS10-E20 was even slightly attenuated compared with JS10 (Table 1). Thus, consecutive passage of JS10 through air sacs enhanced viral virulence, while passage through chicken embryos attenuated virulence.

Tissue tropism and histopathology detection.

Tissue tropism was investigated by determining the viral titers in the organs of infected chickens through oral, nasal, intramuscular, and intravenous inoculation on day 3 p.i. JS10 was recovered from the trachea, lung, air sac, and intestine of chickens infected through oral and nasal routes, while viral replication was limited to the intestine following intramuscular inoculation (Fig. 1). When the virus was inoculated intravenously, the virus was found in the lung, air sac, spleen, and intestine. JS10-A10, whether inoculated orally, nasally, or intramuscularly, was isolated from all organs except for the brain, though it could also be recovered from the brain following intravenous inoculation. In contrast, JS10-E20 was recovered only from the trachea in the orally and nasally inoculated groups. These results indicated that the tissue tropism of JS10-A10 expanded dramatically and ultimately became pantropic, another characteristic of velogenic viruses. However, the replication ability of JS10-E20 in SPF chickens was significantly reduced.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Measurement of tissue tropism in chickens infected with JS10 and its variants. Viral titers in chickens infected orally (A), nasally (B), intramuscularly (C), or intravenously (D). Data are the logarithmic means of the samples. Error bars represent standard deviations. ****, P < 0.001.

Histopathological examination showed that severe lesions, including hemorrhages, proliferation of periparabronchial lymphoid tissues, and infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes, were observed in the lungs, intestines, and spleens of chickens infected with JS10-A10 (Fig. 2). In contrast, no histopathological change was observed in the lungs, intestines, or spleens of chickens infected with JS10 or JS10-E20 (Fig. 2A to F and J to L).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Histopathology examination of JS10 and its variants in chickens (tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin). (A, D, G, and J) Lung; (B, E, H, and K) intestine; (C, F, I, and L) spleen. (A to C) PBS-injected chickens. (D to F) JS10-infected chickens. (G to I) JS10-A10-infected chickens. Pneumonorrhagia, inflammation, and obvious hemorrhage in lung (G); slight esophagitis and mild hemorrhagic proventriculitis with infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages in intestine (H); and severe necrosis, marked lymphocyte depletion, and infiltration of macrophages in spleen (I) were observed. (J to L) JS10-E20-infected chickens. No histopathological changes were observed.

Virus shedding and cohabitation infection examination.

Virus shedding of JS10, JS10-A10, or JS10-E20 was examined through virus isolation from oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs of infected SPF chickens. Results showed that JS10 and JS10-A10 isolation was positive from 80% and 100% of oropharyngeal swabs on day 2 p.i. and 60% and 80% on day 4 p.i., respectively. For cloacal swabs, JS10 and JS10-A10 isolation was positive from 60% and 70% on day 4 p.i. and 80% and 100% on days 7 p.i., respectively. In contrast, JS10-E20 was isolated from only 40% and 30% of oropharyngeal swabs on days 2 and 4 p.i., respectively. No JS10-E20 was isolated from cloacal swabs on time points examined in this study (Fig. 3A and B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Virus shedding from inoculation and cohabitation of chickens infected with JS10 and its variants. (A) Positive samples from oropharyngeal swabs of JS10-, JS10-A10-, and JS10-E20-inoculated chickens. (B) Positive samples from cloacal swabs of JS10-, JS10-A10-, and JS10-E20-infected chickens. (C) Positive samples from oropharyngeal swabs of chickens cohabitating with JS10, JS10-A10, and JS10-E20-infected chickens. (D) Positive samples from cloacal swabs of chickens cohabitating with JS10, JS10-A10, and JS10-E20-infected chickens.

Cohabitation infection was examined by determining the viral shedding from chickens in contact with infected chickens. After cohabitation with JS10-infected chickens, only 25% of oropharyngeal swabs and cloacal swabs were positive on day 7 p.i. However, virus was isolated from both oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs of all chickens that cohabited with the JS10-A10-infected group on day 7 p.i., indicating that JS10-A10 is transmissible. However, no viruses were isolated from oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs of chickens in contact with JS10-E20-infected birds at 2, 4, and 7 dpi, demonstrating that JS10-E20 lost transmissibility (Fig. 3C and D).

Genetic comparisons between parent virus and passaged variants.

The sequence homology among JS10, JS10-A10, and JS10-E20 was 99.7 to 99.9%, suggesting that all variants originated from the same parent virus, JS10. However, a total of 41 mutations from JS10 were identified in JS10-A10, of which 26 led to amino acid substitutions (Table 2). Three mutations in the cleavage site coding region of the F gene caused changes from the lentogenic cleavage site 112ERQERL117 to the typical velogenic sequence 112KRQKRF117 and are likely to contribute to the increased viral pathogenicity of JS10-A10 in chickens. Another 22 mutations were dispersed throughout the rest of the viral genome. We also identified 25 mutations between JS10 and JS10-E20, 14 of which led to amino acid substitutions (Table 2). Three of these mutations were unique to JS10-E20, while 11 were also found in JS10-A10 and located mainly at the polymerase proteins (6 amino acids) or protein associated with virus polymerase complex (5 amino acids).

TABLE 2.

Amino acid substitutions among Duck/JS/10 and its passaged variants

Gene Nucleotide (amino acid) position Codon (deduced amino acid)
Duck/JS/10 Duck/JS/10-A10 Duck/JS/10-E20
NP 1088–1090 (323) GTA (Ala) GCA (Val) No change
1250–1252 (377) GGC (Gly) GAC (Asp) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
P 2067–2069 (61) GCT (Ala) TCT (Ser) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
2175–2177 (97) GTC (Val) GCT (Ala) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
2676–2678 (264) CCG (Pro) TCG (Ser) No change
M 3305–3307 (2) GGC (Gly) GAC (Asp) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
3332–3334 (11) CTC (Leu) TTC (Phe) No change
3560–3562 (87) CTA (Leu) CGA (Arg) No change
4343–4345 (348) ACC (Thr) GCC (Ala) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
4358–4360 (353) GGG (Gly) AGG (Arg) No change
F 4727–4729 (58) TCA (Ser) ACA (Thr) No change
4823–4825 (90) ACA (Thr) GTC (Val) No change
4889–4891 (112) GAA (Glu) AAA (Lys) No change
4898–4900 (115) GAG (Glu) AAG (Lys) No change
4904–4906 (117) TTA (Leu) TTC (Phe) No change
5084–5086 (177) GAT (Asp) GTT (Val) No change
5327–5329 (258) ATT (Ile) AAT (Lys) No change
5739–5741 (395) AAG (Lys) No change AGG (Arg)
5840–5842 (429) CCC (Pro) No change CTC (Leu)
HN 7906–7908 (495) GAG (Glu) AAG (Lys) No change
8077–8079 (552) CTA (Leu) ATA (Ile) No change
L 9281–9283 (297) GCG (Ala) GTG (Val) No change
9965–9967 (525) TTA (Leu) No change TTT (Phe)
10118–10120 (576) ACC (Thr) ATC (Ile) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
10790–10792 (800) GGG (Gly) GAG (Glu) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
10913–110915 (841) AGT (Ser) AAT (Asn) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
13067–13069 (1541) TGG (Trp) GGG (Gly) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
13322–13324 (1644) GTT (Val) ATT (Ile) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10
14576–14578 (2062) AGC (Ser) AGA (Arg) Same as Duck/JS/10-A10

UDPS and calculation of background errors.

To perform UDPS analysis of different virulence-related F0 cleavage site sequences from a series of NDV variants, simultaneous analyses were conducted using barcoded primers. A total of 366,732 sequence reads were obtained from JS10, JS10-P, and its variants using UDPS, and the average number of sequence reads was 26,195 (range, 19,767 to 51,341) per sample. An average of 20,726 UDPS sequence reads could be aligned with the standard sequence, which accounted for 79% of the total reads (Fig. 4A). The average read length was 378 bp per sample (Fig. 4B). The number of reads at each position in the tested region ranged from 6,000 to 10,000 (Fig. 4C). The background error rate of UDPS from nucleotides 169 to 556 of the F gene was calculated with JS10-P (Fig. 4D). Among 26,657 valid reads, each of which was 386 nucleotides (nt) long, the maximum error rate was 2.02% at the 462nd base, and the next highest error rate was 0.67% at the 457th base. There are two three-A homopolymers between TT from nucleotides 457 to 462. The second three-A homopolymer region ending at nucleotide 462 was read as a two-A homopolymer, and the first three-A homopolymer region beginning at nucleotide 457 was read as a two-A homopolymer in most of the obtained sequences; these homopolymer sequences are a weak point of UDPS. Excluding the 462nd and 457th nucleotide positions, the error rate was ∼0.02% or lower. From repeated deep sequencing of the plasmid, the overall nucleotide error rate was calculated as 0.00031 ± 0.0004 (mean ± standard deviation [SD])/base. Based on this analysis, a mixture of bases detectable above the background error of 0.034% (mean background error rate ± 2 SDs) was defined as a biologically significant mixture.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Summary of ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS) results. (A) Number of reads and aligned reads for each sample. (B) Average read length for each sample. (C) NDV F gene coverage. The dots represent the minimum, 25% quartile, 75% quartile, and maximum coverage of reads of samples at each amino acid position of the F protein. (D) JS10-P (F gene plasmid) was subjected to UDPS, and the background error rate of pyrosequencing was calculated.

Variability of F gene cleavage site sequence in JS10 and its variants.

Based on the 263,511 valid sequence reads, the F gene fragment, which was limited to codons 57 to 185, in JS10 and its variants was analyzed. Variability was analyzed as the percentage of changes in all codons of the limited region (Fig. 5A).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Diversity of NDV quasispecies in JS10 and its variants. (A) Comparison of NDV quasispecies diversity in each amino acid of the F protein. (B) Variation dynamic curve of three amino acid positions.

Ten air sac-passaged variants (JS10-A1 to JS10-A10) had a much higher variability at three codons (112, 115, and 117) of the F0 cleavage site, from 97.42 to 99.03%. The variability for other F0 codons ranged from 0.01 to 0.02%. In contrast, two embryo-passaged variants, JS10-E10 and JS10-E20, showed differences at only amino acid 82, with 18 to 27% variability, respectively (Fig. 5A).

Linkage analysis was performed to determine the codon accounts for the most frequent amino acid substitution in the same viral sequence at the cleavage site. Sequence variability gradually increased with increasing passage times in air sacs (Fig. 5B). The JS10 isolate was shown to be a mixture of different sequences at codons 112, 115, and 117. Characteristic virulence codon ratios at positions 112, 115, and 117 in JS10 were 0.73%, 0.68%, and 0.49%, respectively. In JS10-A1, the ratios at codons were increased to 4.25%, 4.08%, and 0.64%, respectively. In JS10-A10, the ratios were dramatically increased to 99.03%, 98.89%, and 97.42%, respectively. In each passaged variant, codon 112 had the largest variation ratio, followed by codon 115 and then codon 117. In addition, the variation at codons 112, 115, and 117 emerged sequentially with increased passaging. The average variation ratios at codons 112, 115, and 117 of air sac-passaged variants were 76.35%, 73.28%, and 51.86%, respectively. In comparison, the mean variation frequency of the same three positions at the cleavage site of two selected embryo-passaged viruses was only 0.72%, 0.53%, and 0.49%, respectively (Fig. 5B).

Analysis of quasispecies constituting JS10 and its variants.

Quasispecies analysis showed that the sequences at the F0 cleavage site of positions 112 to 117 could be divided among 32 different types (Table 3). The lentogenic cleavage sites consisted of 112ERQERL117, 112GRQGRL117, 112GRQERL117, and 112ERQGRL117, and the velogenic cleavage sites consisted of 112RRQRRF117, 112KRQKRF117, 112KRQRRF117, and 112RRQKRF117, respectively. The other 24 cleavage site sequences were classified as transitional types.

TABLE 3.

Categorization of NDV F0 cleavage site

Cleavage site Amino acids 112–117
Velogenic RRQRRF, KRQKRF, KRQRRF, RRQKRF
Transitional R(K)RQE(G)RL, E(G)RQR(K)RL, R(K)RQR(K)RL, E(G)RQE(G)RF, R(K)RQE(G)RF, E(G)RQR(K)RF
Lentogenic ERQERL, GRQGRL, GRQERL, ERQGRL

The dynamic changes of the quasispecies proportions in JS10 and its air sac-passaged variants were calculated (Fig. 6A). Based on the pyrosequencing data, the major portion of 99.30% at the F0 sequence in JS10 was lentogenic, while the velogenic and transitional F0 sequence proportions were 0.34% and 0.36%, respectively. After air sac passaging, the proportion of transitional F0 sequence in JS10 gradually increased from JS10-A1, and then the proportion of velogenic F0 sequence gradually increased from JS10-A3, while the proportion of lentogenic F0 sequence decreased. After 10 passages, the proportion of the velogenic F0 sequence accumulated to 94.87%. In contrast, the rate of the lentogenic F0 sequence detected in JS10-A10 declined to 0.28%.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Composition of NDV quasispecies according to F0 cleavage site of JS10 and its air sac-passaged variants (A) and chicken embryo-passaged variants (B).

From JS10-A1 to JS10-A5, the proportions of the total transitional F0 sequences continued to rise, and in JS10-A5, the proportion reached its peak at 82.58%. However, the proportion of the total transitional F0 sequence started to decrease at JS10-A6, and the trend became more obvious with additional passages, as the proportion in JS10-A10 declined to 4.83%. The proportions of transitional F0 sequence genotypes of 112E(G)RQE(G)RF117, 112R(K)RQE(G)RF117, and 112E(G)RQR(K)RF117 were all under 0.5% during 10 air sac passages (not shown in Fig. 6A).

After 10 passages in embryos, the proportions of velogenic, lentogenic, and transitional F0 sequences changed from 0.34%, 99.30%, and 0.36% in JS10 to 0.10%, 99.45%, and 0.45% in JS10-E10, respectively (Fig. 6B). After another 10 passages, the proportions of velogenic and transitional F0 sequences decreased to 0 and 0.12%, respectively, but the proportion of lentogenic F0 sequence increased to 99.88%. Also, the proportions of transitional F0 sequence genotypes of 112E(G)RQE(G)RF117, 112R(K)RQE(G)RF117, and 112E(G)RQR(K)RF117 were all absent during 20 consecutive embryo passages (not shown in Fig. 6B).

DISCUSSION

We compared the potential impacts on virulence enhancement of passaging the avirulent NDV isolate JS10 in chicken air sacs versus chicken embryos. JS10-A10, the variant of JS10 after 10 consecutive passages through chicken air sacs, produced 100% mortality within 48 h p.i. and the classic virulent syncytia in infected cells on day 3 p.i. The pathogenicity indices of MDT, ICPI, and IVPI were all increased to the value of virulent NDV, suggesting that the velogenic variant JS10-A10 was evolved from the lentogenic JS10 after consecutive passages in chicken air sacs. Virus tissue tropism and transmission studies indicated that JS10-A10 produced an expanded tissue tropism and robust transmissible infection in chickens. Interestingly, we also identified changes in the JS10-A10 F0 cleavage sites associated with virulence by UDPS. With the passaging in air sacs, the lentogenic F0 genotypes of 112E(G)RQE(G)RL117 were reduced from 99.30% to 0.28% after 10 consecutive passages. Meanwhile, the velogenic F0 genotypes of 112R(K)RQR(K)RF117 were increased from 0.34% to 94.87%, which suggested that the emergence of velogenic F0 genotypes contributes to the virulence enhancement of JS10-A10. These findings were similar to the previous report (32), in which a wild-waterfowl-origin, avirulent class I NDV isolate, Goose/Alaska/415/91, was evolved to a velogenic virus, with the ICPI and IVPI increasing from 0 to 1.20 and 1.60, respectively, through nine consecutive passages in air sacs. This revealed that some avirulent NDVs maintained in the natural environment have the potential to evolve to the velogenic type, as happened in in Australia (21, 22, 3739).

To investigate whether virulence enhancement can appear in other lentogenic NDV isolates in the air sac model, we plaque purified two other avirulent isolates three times and conducted the same passage experiments. No virulence enhancement was observed after 10 consecutive air sac inoculations of these two isolates in our study (data not shown). Further sequence analysis of these two plaque-purified isolates by using UDPS showed that the proportion of the transitional genotypes was much lower than that of JS10, and no velogenic genotypes were detected, suggesting that the virulence enhancement of NDV during air sac passages is virus strain dependent. These findings, together with the previous results (32), suggest that among avirulent NDVs, a virulence evolution mechanism for some avirulent NDV strains may exist during air sac passages, which needs further investigation.

Conditions under which highly virulent viruses are generated from an avirulent strain through air sac passage are generally not found in nature. However, numerous lentogenic NDVs are carried by apparently healthy domestic waterfowl intermingling with terrestrial poultry (7, 1316, 40). Air sacs are spaces where there is the constant presence of air; they form a connection between the lungs and bone cavities and aid in regulation of breathing in chickens (4144). In our study, JS10 can be recovered from the air sac of chickens infected through oral and nasal routes. Therefore, avirulent NDV strains that grow efficiently in poultry respiratory and intestinal tracts may at times access chicken air sacs and evolve a virulent phenotype upon subsequent replication, eventually causing outbreaks in susceptible chickens.

NDV quasispecies are composed of “lentogenic” genomes and “velogenic” genomes in different proportions (23). To investigate the viral population dynamics during the virulence alteration, we used UDPS to analyze the quasispecies composition for JS10 and its variants. We found that amino acid variations mainly located at the F0 cleavage site and velogenic genomes accumulated as a function of serial passage. Furthermore, our results also confirmed that the virulence of NDVs evolved from the lentogenic type via the mesogenic type and ultimately changed to the velogenic type.

Single-point mutation can lead to large changes in viral phenotypes (4548). Recently, it has been shown that quasispecies diversity can also determine the pathogenic potential of a viral population, especially for RNA viruses (4953). Our results strongly suggest that the observed NDV pathogenesis was modulated by the proportion of avirulent and virulent genomes and their interactions. This is the first study to demonstrate experimentally that quasispecies status is closely related to NDV pathogenesis. As the velogenic NDV perhaps directly evolves from lentogenic NDV in appropriate environments, employing next-generation sequencing methods to obtain the numerous gene sequences which can reflect the quasispecies status of the clinical isolates may contribute to surveillance of lentogenic NDVs.

As the molecular basis for how the interplay among viral genomes may affect host populations is still unknown, it seems desirable in the future to elucidate the unique ecological niche that exists in chicken air sacs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Xiufan Liu for support in the animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL3) facility located at Yangzhou University.

This work was funded by the Chinese National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program, 2011AA10A209), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303033), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31001077).

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Chinese National High-Tech R&D Program (863 Program, 2011AA10A209), the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303033), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31001077).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ganar K, Das M, Sinha S, Kumar S. 2014. Newcastle disease virus: current status and our understanding. Virus Res 184:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alexander DJ, Aldous EW, Fuller CM. 2012. The long view: a selective review of 40 years of Newcastle disease research. Avian Pathol 41:329–335. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2012.697991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dortmans JC, Koch G, Rottier PJ, Peeters BP. 2011. Virulence of Newcastle disease virus: what is known so far? Vet Res 42:122. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wakamatsu N, King DJ, Seal BS, Peeters BP, Brown CC. 2006. The effect on pathogenesis of Newcastle disease virus LaSota strain from a mutation of the fusion cleavage site to a virulent sequence. Avian Dis 50:483–488. doi: 10.1637/7515-020706R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alexander DJ. 2009. Ecology and epidemiology of Newcastle disease, p 19–26. In Capua I, Alexander DJ (ed), Avian influenza and Newcastle disease. A field and laboratory manual. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu H, Wang Z, Wang Y, Sun C, Zheng D, Wu Y. 2008. Characterization of Newcastle disease virus isolated from waterfowl in China. Avian Dis 52:150–155. doi: 10.1637/8030-061507-Reg. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee E-K, Jeon W-J, Kwon J-H, Yang C-B, Choi K-S. 2009. Molecular epidemiological investigation of Newcastle disease virus from domestic ducks in Korea. Vet Microbiol 134:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu H, Zhao Y, Zheng D, Lv Y, Zhang W, Xu T, Li J, Wang Z. 2011. Multiplex RT-PCR for rapid detection and differentiation of class I and class II Newcastle disease viruses. J Virol Methods 171:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu X, Wang X, Wu S, Hu S, Peng Y, Xue F. 2009. Surveillance for avirulent Newcastle disease viruses in domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos and Cairina moschata) at live bird markets in Eastern China and characterization of the viruses isolated. Avian Pathol 38:377–391. doi: 10.1080/03079450903183637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim LM, King DJ, Suarez DL, Wong CW, Afonso CL. 2007. Characterization of class I Newcastle disease virus isolates from Hong Kong live bird markets and detection using real-time reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol 45:1310–1314. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02594-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim LM, King DJ, Curry PE, Suarez DL, Swayne DE, Stallknecht DE, Slemons RD, Pedersen JC, Senne DA, Winker K, Afonso CL. 2007. Phylogenetic diversity among low-virulence Newcastle disease viruses from waterfowl and shorebirds and comparison of genotype distributions to those of poultry-origin isolates. J Virol 81:12641–12653. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00843-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seal BS, Wise MG, Pedersen JC, Senne DA, Alvarez R, Scott MS, King DJ, Yu Q, Kapczynski DR. 2005. Genomic sequences of low-virulence avian paramyxovirus-1 (Newcastle disease virus) isolates obtained from live-bird markets in North America not related to commonly utilized commercial vaccine strains. Vet Microbiol 106:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim LM, Suarez DL, Afonso CL. 2008. Detection of a broad range of class I and II Newcastle disease viruses using a multiplex real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. J Vet Diagn Invest 20:414–425. doi: 10.1177/104063870802000402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu J, Xu H, Liu J, Zhao Z, Hu S, Wang X, Liu X. 2014. Surveillance of avirulent Newcastle disease viruses at live bird markets in Eastern China during 2008–2012 reveals a new sub-genotype of class I virus. Virol J 11:211. doi: 10.1186/s12985-014-0211-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim B-Y, Lee D-H, Kim M-S, Jang J-H, Lee Y-N, Park J-K, Yuk S-S, Lee J-B, Park S-Y, Choi I-S. 2012. Exchange of Newcastle disease viruses in Korea: the relatedness of isolates between wild birds, live bird markets, poultry farms and neighboring countries. Infect Genet Evol 12:478–482. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Choi K-S, Lee E-K, Jeon W-J, Kwon J-H, Lee J-H, Sung H-W. 2012. Molecular epidemiologic investigation of lentogenic Newcastle disease virus from domestic birds at live bird markets in Korea. Avian Dis 56:218–223. doi: 10.1637/9699-030311-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biebricher CK, Eigen M. 2006. What is a quasispecies? Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 299:1–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Domingo E, Sheldon J, Perales C. 2012. Viral quasispecies evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:159–216. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05023-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Domingo E, Gomez J. 2007. Quasispecies and its impact on viral hepatitis. Virus Res 127:131–150. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Andino R, Domingo E. 2015. Viral quasispecies. Virology 479-480:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Westbury H. 2001. Newcastle disease virus: an evolving pathogen? Avian Pathol 30:5–11. doi: 10.1080/03079450020023131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gould AR, Kattenbelt JA, Selleck P, Hansson E, Della-Porta A, Westbury HA. 2001. Virulent Newcastle disease in Australia: molecular epidemiological analysis of viruses isolated prior to and during the outbreaks of 1998–2000. Virus Res 77:51–60. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00265-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kattenbelt JA, Stevens MP, Selleck PW, Gould AR. 2010. Analysis of Newcastle disease virus quasispecies and factors affecting the emergence of virulent virus. Arch Virol 155:1607–1615. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0739-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cao L, Wu C, Shi H, Gong Z, Zhang E, Wang H, Zhao K, Liu S, Li S, Gao X. 2014. Coexistence of hepatitis B virus quasispecies enhances viral replication and the ability to induce host antibody and cellular immune responses. J Virol 88:8656–8666. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01123-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Selleri M, Piralla A, Rozera G, Giombini E, Bartolini B, Abbate I, Campanini G, Rovida F, Dossena L, Capobianchi MR, Baldanti F. 2013. Detection of haemagglutinin D222 polymorphisms in influenza A(H1N1) pdm09-infected patients by ultra-deep pyrosequencing. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:668–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Homs M. 2012. Quasispecies dynamics in main core epitopes of hepatitis B virus by ultra-deep-pyrosequencing. World J Gastroenterol 18:6096. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abbate I, Vlassi C, Rozera G, Bruselles A, Bartolini B, Giombini E, Corpolongo A, D'Offizi G, Narciso P, Desideri A. 2011. Detection of quasispecies variants predicted to use CXCR4 by ultra-deep pyrosequencing during early HIV infection. AIDS 25:611–617. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328343489e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hedskog C, Mild M, Jernberg J, Sherwood E, Bratt G, Leitner T, Lundeberg J, Andersson B, Albert J. 2010. Dynamics of HIV-1 quasispecies during antiviral treatment dissected using ultra-deep pyrosequencing. PLoS One 5:e11345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ramakrishnan MA, Tu ZJ, Singh S, Chockalingam AK, Gramer MR, Wang P, Goyal SM, Yang M, Halvorson DA, Sreevatsan S. 2009. The feasibility of using high resolution genome sequencing of influenza A viruses to detect mixed infections and quasispecies. PLoS One 4:e7105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meng C, Qiu X, Jin S, Yu S, Chen H, Ding C. 2012. Whole genome sequencing and biological characterization of Duck/JS/10, a new lentogenic class I Newcastle disease virus. Arch Virol 157:869–880. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ito T, Goto H, Yamamoto E, Tanaka H, Takeuchi M, Kuwayama M, Kawaoka Y, Otsuki K. 2001. Generation of a highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus from an avirulent field isolate by passaging in chickens. J Virol 75:4439–4443. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.9.4439-4443.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shengqing Y, Kishida N, Ito H, Kida H, Otsuki K, Kawaoka Y, Ito T. 2002. Generation of velogenic Newcastle disease viruses from a nonpathogenic waterfowl isolate by passaging in chickens. Virology 301:206–211. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). 2008. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (mammals, birds, and bees), 6th ed World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miller PJ, King DJ, Afonso CL, Suarez DL. 2007. Antigenic differences among Newcastle disease virus strains of different genotypes used in vaccine formulation affect viral shedding after a virulent challenge. Vaccine 25:7238–7246. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gohm DS, Thür B, Hofmann M. 2000. Detection of Newcastle disease virus in organs and faeces of experimentally infected chickens using RT-PCR. Avian Pathol 29:143–152. doi: 10.1080/03079450094171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gregori J, Esteban JI, Cubero M, Garcia-Cehic D, Perales C, Casillas R, Alvarez-Tejado M, Rodríguez-Frías F, Guardia J, Domingo E. 2013. Ultra-deep pyrosequencing (UDPS) data treatment to study amplicon HCV minor variants. PLoS One 8:e83361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.French E. 1964. Evidence of freedom of Australian flocks from infection with Newcastle disease virus. Aust Vet J 40:119–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.French E, George T, Percy JJ. 1967. Infection of chicks with recently isolated Newcastle disease viruses of low virulence. Aust Vet J 43:404–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1967.tb04895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Simmons G. 1967. The isolation of Newcastle disease virus in Queensland. Aust Vet J 43:29–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1967.tb04764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu W, Liu H, Zhang T, Han Z, Jiang Y, Xu Q, Shao Y, Li H, Kong X, Chen H. 2015. Molecular and antigenic characteristics of Newcastle disease virus isolates from domestic ducks in China. Infect Genet Evol 32:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brackenbury JH. 1972. Lung-air-sac anatomy and respiratory pressures in the bird. J Exp Biol 57:543–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Scheid P. 1979. Mechanisms of gas exchange in bird lungs. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 86:137–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Klein W, Codd JR. 2010. Breathing and locomotion: comparative anatomy, morphology and function. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 173:S26–S32. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Piiper J, Scheid P. 1989. Respiration and gas exchange in birds, p 153–162. In Bech C, Reinertsen RE (ed), Physiology of cold adaptation in birds. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tsetsarkin KA, Vanlandingham DL, McGee CE, Higgs S. 2007. A single mutation in chikungunya virus affects vector specificity and epidemic potential. PLoS Pathog 3:e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Conenello GM, Zamarin D, Perrone LA, Tumpey T, Palese P. 2007. A single mutation in the PB1-F2 of H5N1 (HK/97) and 1918 influenza A viruses contributes to increased virulence. PLoS Pathog 3:e141. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ives J, Carr J, Mendel D, Tai C, Lambkin R, Kelly L, Oxford J, Hayden F, Roberts N. 2002. The H274Y mutation in the influenza A/H1N1 neuraminidase active site following oseltamivir phosphate treatment leave virus severely compromised both in vitro and in vivo. Antiviral Res 55:307–317. doi: 10.1016/S0166-3542(02)00053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brault AC, Huang CY, Langevin SA, Kinney RM, Bowen RA, Ramey WN, Panella NA, Holmes EC, Powers AM, Miller BR. 2007. A single positively selected West Nile viral mutation confers increased virogenesis in American crows. Nat Genet 39:1162–1166. doi: 10.1038/ng2097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vignuzzi M, Stone JK, Arnold JJ, Cameron CE, Andino R. 2006. Quasispecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interactions in a viral population. Nature 439:344–348. doi: 10.1038/nature04388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pawlotsky J-M. 2003. Hepatitis C virus genetic variability: pathogenic and clinical implications. Clin Liver Dis 7:45–66. doi: 10.1016/S1089-3261(02)00065-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lhomme S, Abravanel F, Dubois M, Sandres-Saune K, Rostaing L, Kamar N, Izopet J. 2012. Hepatitis E virus quasispecies and the outcome of acute hepatitis E in solid-organ transplant patients. J Virol 86:10006–10014. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01003-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Park C-W, Cho M-C, Hwang K, Ko S-Y, Oh H-B, Lee HC. 2014. Comparison of quasispecies diversity of HCV between chronic hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma by ultradeep pyrosequencing. Biomed Res Int 2014:853076. doi: 10.1155/2014/853076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gutiérrez RA, Viari A, Godelle B, Frutos R, Buchy P. 2013. Biased mutational pattern and quasispecies hypothesis in H5N1 virus. Infect Genet Evol 15:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES