Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1967 May;20(3):290–293. doi: 10.1136/jcp.20.3.290

A comparative trial of Rappaport enrichment medium for the isolation of Salmonellae from faeces

J B Iveson 1, N Kovacs 1,1
PMCID: PMC473490  PMID: 5602565

Abstract

Seven-thousand-and-thirty-six specimens of faeces were examined for Salmonellae using three enrichment culture media in parallel.

Rappaport's magnesium chloride malachite green broth medium proved superior to selenite F and tetrathionate broths in the recovery of a wide variety of Salmonella serotypes. However, it was inferior to selenite broth in the recovery of Salmonella typhi.

A higher recovery rate of Salmonellae was obtained from undiluted than from 1: 1,000 dilution of faeces.

Full text

PDF
290

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson K., Kennedy H. Comparison of selective media for the isolation of salmonellae. J Clin Pathol. 1965 Nov;18(6):747–749. doi: 10.1136/jcp.18.6.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COLLARD P., UNWIN M. A trial of Rappaport's medium. J Clin Pathol. 1958 Sep;11(5):426–427. doi: 10.1136/jcp.11.5.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HAJNA A. A., DAMON S. R. New enrichment and plating media for the isolation of Salmonella and Shigella organisms. Appl Microbiol. 1956 Nov;4(6):341–345. doi: 10.1128/am.4.6.341-345.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hooper W. L., Jenkins H. R. An evaluation of Rappaport's magnesium chloride/malachite green medium in the routine examination of faeces. J Hyg (Lond) 1965 Dec;63(4):491–495. doi: 10.1017/s002217240004537x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. IVESON J. B., KOVACS N., LAURIE W. AN IMPROVED METHOD OF ISOLATING SALMONELLAE FROM CONTAMINATED DESICCATED COCONUT. J Clin Pathol. 1964 Jan;17:75–78. doi: 10.1136/jcp.17.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KONFORTI N., NAVON B., RAPPAPORT F. A new enrichment medium for certain Salmonellae. J Clin Pathol. 1956 Aug;9(3):261–266. doi: 10.1136/jcp.9.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SEN R. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF SEVERAL MEDIA IN THE ISOLATION OF SHIGELLAE AND SALMONELLAE FROM FAECES. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol. 1964 Apr;55:93–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. THOMSON S. The number of bacilli harboured by enteric carriers. J Hyg (Lond) 1954 Mar;52(1):67–70. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400027261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zajc-Satler J., Banic S. Efficacy of different selective media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. J Clin Pathol. 1965 Nov;18(6):750–751. doi: 10.1136/jcp.18.6.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES