Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1967 Nov;20(6):879–882. doi: 10.1136/jcp.20.6.879

Evaluation of the fluorescent antibody technique for the diagnosis of smallpox

A L A El-Ganzoury 1,2
PMCID: PMC473631  PMID: 4881833

Abstract

Smears on slides taken from 44 patients suspected of having smallpox were examined for the presence of smallpox antigens and from 15 of them for chickenpox antigens also, by the fluorescent antibody method, using the conventional `sandwich' and the complement techniques. In seven, very strong non-specific fluorescence made the result unreadable. When staining for smallpox antigen results agreeing with the diagnoses established by other methods were obtained in 36 of 37, and when staining for chickenpox in 12 of 13 specimens examined. One false positive diagnosis of smallpox and one false negative of chickenpox were made. Because of intense non-specific staining no diagnosis could be made from other smears stored for three years. It was not possible to reach a diagnosis by examination of crust suspensions spread on slides. In five fresh specimens examined during the outbreak there was hardly any non-specific fluorescence and results could more easily be read. Morphological features as seen by fluorescence microscopy are described. The value of the method in the diagnosis of smallpox is discussed.

Full text

PDF
879

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CARSKI T. R. A fluorescent antibody study of the simian foamy agent. J Immunol. 1960 Apr;84:426–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cruickshank J. G., Bedson H. S., Watson D. H. Electron microscopy in the rapid diagnosis of smallpox. Lancet. 1966 Sep 3;2(7462):527–530. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)92882-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GOLDWASSER R. A., SHEPARD C. C. Staining of complement and modification of fluorescent antibody procedures. J Immunol. 1958 Feb;80(2):122–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HINUMA Y., HUMMELER K. Studies on the complement-fixing antigens of poliomyelitis. III. Intracellular development of antigen. J Immunol. 1961 Oct;87:367–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KIRSH D., KISSLING R. THE USE OF IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE IN THE RAPID PRESUMPTIVE DIAGNOSIS OF VARIOLA. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29:126–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LEE C. L., DAVIDSOHN I., TAKAHASHI T. PROLONGED IMMUNIZATION. II. EFFECT OF COMPLEMENT-FIXING, INCOMPLETE AND COMBINING ANTIBODIES IN RABBIT ANTI-MOUSE ERYTHROCYTE SERUM. J Immunol. 1965 Mar;94:423–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MURRAY H. G. The diagnosis of smallpox by immunofluroescence. Lancet. 1963 Apr 20;1(7286):847–848. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)91621-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PETERS D., NIELSEN G., BAYER M. E. [Variola. Reliability of the rapid electron-microscopic diagnosis]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1962 Nov 2;87:2240–2246. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1114082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stratton F. Zymosan coated particles used to prepare anti-beta-1C. Vox Sang. 1966 Mar-Apr;11(2):232–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1966.tb04230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WELLER T. H., COONS A. H. Fluorescent antibody studies with agents of varicella and herpes zoster propagated in vitro. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Aug-Sep;86(4):789–794. doi: 10.3181/00379727-86-21235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES