Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2015 Jan 28;17(3):692–695. doi: 10.1021/ol503717r

Total Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of the Tetramic Acid Based Natural Product Harzianic Acid and Its Stereoisomers

Alan R Healy †, Francesco Vinale ‡, Matteo Lorito ‡,§, Nicholas J Westwood †,*
PMCID: PMC4737532  PMID: 25629709

Abstract

graphic file with name ol-2014-03717r_0007.jpg

The bioactive natural product harzianic acid was prepared for the first time in just six steps (longest linear sequence) with an overall yield of 22%. The identification of conditions to telescope amide bond formation and a Lacey–Dieckmann reaction into one pot proved important. The three stereoisomers of harzianic acid were also prepared, providing material for comparison of their biological activity. While all of the isomers promoted root growth, improved antifungal activity was unexpectedly associated with isomers in the enantiomeric series opposite that of harzianic acid.

Harzianic acid (1a) is a member of a subfamily of tetramic acid containing natural products that is defined by the presence of an unnatural 4,4-disubstituted glutamic acid unit. Despite the unique and potent biological activities displayed by members of this subfamily,1 there has been little synthetic activity until our recently reported total synthesis of JBIR-22.5

As a means of exploring further our synthetic approach to members of this subfamily, we next looked to prepare harzianic acid (1a), a secondary metabolite isolated from Trichoderma harzianum.2 This filamentous fungus is used as a biopesticide and biofertilizer due to its growth-promoting and antifungal properties, and the production of 1a by the fungus has been implicated in this biological activity.3,4 The relative and absolute stereochemistry of 1a was assigned by Vinale et al. using small-molecule X-ray crystallography (CCDC 745241) after an initial report by Sawa et al.2,6 More recently, the C5′-isomer of 1a, referred to as isoharzianic acid (1b), has also been isolated from the same fungus.7

Here, we report the first total synthesis of 1a and its three stereoisomers, including isoharzianic acid (1b). To the best of our knowledge, no synthetic routes to 1a and 1b have been reported to date. All of the stereoisomers were assessed for their antifungal and plant growth-promoting activities. Our synthetic approach used the masked 4,4,-disubstitued glutamic acid 3 as a core fragment that could be combined with the appropriate polyene fragment 4 (Scheme 1). A late-stage Lacey–Dieckmann condensation of 2 to form the tetramic acid core in 1a would limit the requirement for protecting groups and remove any issues associated with carrying the tetramic acid core through the synthesis, as this unit is both base labile and a powerful chelator of metals.8,9 The synthetic route began with the synthesis of the masked 4,4-disubstituted glutamic acid 3 using our recently reported methodology (summarized in Scheme 2).5 A highly diastereoselective aldol condensation of the tert-butanesulfinamide imine derived from ethyl pyruvate 5 and ethyldimethyl pyruvate followed by a subsequent N-methylation gave lactone 6. A one-pot diastereoselective reduction and cleavage of the N-sulfinyl group then provided 3, the stereochemistry of which was assigned on the basis of X-ray crystallographic analysis of 6(10) and NOE studies on 3.5 This methodology has proved very robust with access to 3 being achieved rapidly on multigram scale.

Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Harzianic Acid (1a).

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Masked 4,4-Disubstituted Glutamic Acid Fragment 3(5).

Scheme 2

Open in a new tab

As 3 was obtained in sufficiently high purity from 6, it was decided to trap crude 3 directly with the required side chain 4 (Scheme 1) after a simple neutralization step. Assembly of the polyene side chain 4 began with DDQ oxidation of commercially available (E)-2-hexenol (7) to the corresponding known aldehyde 8 (Scheme 3). In tandem, Meldrum’s acid was condensed with diethylphosphonoacetic acid to give 9, which was refluxed with tert-butyl thiol in acetonitrile to yield 10.11 Finally, a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction of aldehyde 8 with the dianion generated from 10 provided the required β-ketothioester 4 in good yield (Scheme 3).12

Scheme 3. Synthesis of β-Ketothioester Fragment 4.

Scheme 3

Open in a new tab

The synthesis of harzianic acid (1a) was completed via modification of the silver trifluoroacetate mediated coupling of 4 and crude 3 following the protocol developed by the Ley group.13,14 This approach initially gave the desired β-keto amide 11 in good yield. Compound 11 was then cyclized using tBuOK to provide harzianic acid ethyl ester 12 as a single diastereomer (Scheme 4, route A). However, it was also observed that a small quantity (<10%) of 12 was formed during the initial coupling of 3 and 4. Optimization of this reaction by changing the solvent from THF to acetonitrile resulted in the isolation of harzianic acid ethyl ester 12 in good yield (75% from lactone 6) in just two steps (Scheme 4, route B). This highly efficient procedure enables the synthesis of harzianic acid ethyl ester 12 from lactone 6 in just 1 day.

Scheme 4. Total Synthesis of Harzianic Acid (1a) and 5′-Isoharzianic Acid (1b).

Scheme 4

Open in a new tab

Finally, hydrolysis of harzianic acid ethyl ester 12 with aqueous NaOH (2N) using microwave irradiation provided a readily separable 3:1 mixture of harzianic acid (1a) and 5′-isoharzianic acid (1b), which resulted from partial epimerization at the C5′ position, a common issue observed with tetramic acids.9,15 Harzianic acid (1a) was synthesized in just six steps (longest linear route from ethyl pyruvate) with an overall yield of 22%. The NMR spectral data, HRMS, and the specific rotation obtained for the synthetic harzianic acid (1a) were in excellent agreement with the published data for the natural sample (Figure 1A and Table S1, Supporting Information).2 We next turned our attention to the synthesis of the (R,R) enantiomer of harzianic acid 1c and its epimer (S,R)-5′isoharzianic acid (1d). The described synthetic sequence was repeated using (S)-tert-butanesulfinamide to provide the (R,R) enantiomer of our key intermediate 3, which was converted in an analogous manner to provide 1c and 1d in high purity and quantities (Scheme S1 and Table S2, Supporting Information).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Comparison of selected 13C NMR signals of isolated harzianic acid (1a)2 and synthetic 1a and 1b (see Scheme 1 for numbering and Table S1 for a complete comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR spectral data). (a) 400 MHz, CD3OD; (b) 500 MHz, CD3OD. (B) Section of the 1H NMR spectrum of synthetic 1a in CDCl3 (see the Supporting Information for the full spectrum).

Harzianic acid (1a) and isoharzianic acid (1b) have both been reported to display antifungal activity and to increase seed germination and shoot and root growth in canola and tomato seedlings.6,7,16 The plant growth promoting activity of harzianic acid (1a) is believed to be linked to its potent siderophoric properties.16 Microbial siderophores are iron-chelating agents involved in iron solubilization, which is a crucial mechanism in plant nutrient regulation.17−19 Consistent with this, harzianic acid (1a) has been shown to increase seedling growth even under iron-deficient conditions and also increased iron concentration in the plants.16 The antifungal and plant growth promoting activities of harzianic acid (1a) have highlighted it as a promising bioactive compound which could be used as an alternative to living antagonists. With samples of all four stereoisomers 1a–d in hand, we decided to assess their relative biological activity in a series of assays.

When tested in an assay to assess the effect of the compounds on the root length of tomato seedlings, all of the stereoisomers significantly promoted root length at concentrations above 0.001 mM (Figure S2, Supporting Information). As it seems likely that 1a and 1b can interconvert under typical assay conditions (hence complicating interpretation9,15), results which demonstrate significant differences in behavior between the two enantiomeric series were also sought. In this context, assessment of the activity of stereoisomers 1a–d against the pathogens Sclerotinium rolfsii and Pythium ultimum showed that while all the stereoisomers were able to inhibit the pathogens, the two isomers in the enantiomeric series R,R-1c and S,R-1d were significantly more active than S,S-1a and R,S-1b (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Antibiotic activity of 1a–d against S. rolfsii and (B) P. ultimum. Concentrations ranged from 1 to 1000 μg plug–1.

In summary, we have completed the first total synthesis of harzianic acid 1a and its stereoisomers 1b–d via a short, stereoselective route involving the key masked 4,4-disubstituted glutamic acid 3. Variation of the aldehyde 8 and the pyruvate starting material would facilitate the synthesis of a wide range of analogues through this convergent route. The antifungal activity of the two isomers in the enantiomeric series (R,R-1c and S,R-1d) were significantly more active than the natural harzianic acid (1a) and isoharzianic acid (1b).

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this project was provided by Cancer Research UK (CRUK Grant No. C21383/A6950), Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR), PON R&C 2007-2013 Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca & Competitività 2007-2013 (GenoPOM-pro PON02_00395_3082360, Linfa PON03PE_00026_1 and SIcurezza e innovazione teCnologica Utile alla salvaguardia e valorizzazione dei prodotti tipici di oRigine Animale - Sicura), Campania Region, Piano di Sviluppo Rurale Misura 124 (Progetto Integrato Limone – PIL, Ministry of Economic Development, Italy (Grape and Health Wine – GHW)). We also wish to thank Carolyn Horsburgh and Tomas Lebl (University of St. Andrews), the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service Centre, Swansea, and Roberta Marra, Roberta Quarto, and Roberta Panza (IPSP-CNR and Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”) for technical assistance.

Supporting Information Available

Detailed chemical and biological experimental procedures, spectroscopic data, and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ol503717r_si_001.pdf (912.6KB, pdf)

References

  1. For isolation and reported biological activities of members of this subfamily of tetramic acids, see:; a Kawada M.; Yoshimoto Y.; Kumagai H. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2004, 57, 2–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hazalin N. A. M. N.; Ramasamy K.; Lim S. M.; Cole A. L. J.; Majeed A. B. A. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 609–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yang S.; Mierzwa R.; Terracciano J.; Patel M.; Gullo V.; Wagner N.; Baroudy B.; Puar M.; Chan T.; Chu M. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2007, 60, 524–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Yang S.-W.; Mierzwa R.; Terracciano J.; Patel M.; Gullo V.; Wagner N.; Baroudy B.; Puar M.; Chan T.-M.; McPhail A. T.; Chu M. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 1025–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Daferner M.; Anke T.; Sterner O. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7781–7784. [Google Scholar]; f Izumikawa M.; Hashimoto J.; Hirokawa T.; Sugimoto S.; Kato T.; Takagi M.; Shin-Ya K. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 628–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Hashimoto J.; Watanabe T.; Seki T.; Karasawa S.; Izumikawa M.; Seki T.; Iemura S.-I.; Natsume T.; Nomura N.; Goshima N.; Miyawaki A.; Takagi M.; Shin-Ya K. J. Biomol. Screen. 2009, 14, 970–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sawa R.; Mori Y.; Iinuma H.; Naganawa H.; Hamada M.; Yoshida S.; Furutani H.; Kajimura Y.; Fuwa T.; Takeuchi T. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1994, 47, 731–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vinale F.; Sivasithamparam K.; Ghisalberti E. L.; Marra R.; Woo S. L.; Lorito M. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lorito M.; Woo S. L.; Harman Gary E.; Monte E. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 395–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Healy A. R.; Izumikawa M.; Slawin A. M. Z.; Shin-ya K.; Westwood N. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 10.1002/anie.201411141R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vinale F.; Flematti G.; Sivasithamparam K.; Lorito M.; Marra R.; Skelton B. W.; Ghisalberti E. L. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2032–2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In this paper and here, we have used our standard experimental setup to determine antifungal activity. This involves the deposition of a solid layer of compound under test on the plug of fungus. While this enables increased experimental reproducibility in our hands, it means compound concentrations in the assay are difficult to assess.
  7. Vinale F.; Manganiello G.; Nigro M.; Mazzei P.; Piccolo A.; Pascale A.; Ruocco M.; Marra R.; Lombardi N.; Lanzuise S.; Varlese R.; Cavallo P.; Lorito M.; Woo S. L. Molecules 2014, 19, 9760–9772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schobert R. Naturwissenschaften 2007, 94, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Poncet J.; Jouin P.; Castro B.; Nicolas L.; Boutar M.; Gaudemer A. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 611–616. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deposition no. CCDC-1034467 for compound 6; see ref (5).
  11. The synthesis of 10 has been reported previously via a three-step route; see:Ley S.; Woodward P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 345–346. [Google Scholar]
  12. The HWE olefinatination to provide 4 is an adapted version of a literature procedure; see:Ley S. V.; Smith S. C.; Woodward P. R. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1145–1174. [Google Scholar]
  13. Burke L. T.; Dixon D. J.; Ley S. V.; Rodríguez F. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3611–3613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ley S. V.; Woodward P. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3019–3020. [Google Scholar]
  15. C5′ epimerization was reported by the Ley group during the final stages in the total synthesis of a related natural product, equisetin, see ref (16). For further discussion of this issue, see:; a Marquardt U.; Schmid D.; Jung G. Synlett 2000, 2000, 1131–1132. [Google Scholar]; b Ley S. V.; Smith S. C.; Woodward P. R. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1145–1174. [Google Scholar]; c Royles B. J. L. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1981–2001. [Google Scholar]; d Jeong Y.-C.; Moloney M. G. Synlett 2009, 2009, 2487–2491. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vinale F.; Nigro M.; Sivasithamparam K.; Flematti G.; Ghisalberti E. L.; Ruocco M.; Varlese R.; Marra R.; Lanzuise S.; Eid A.; Woo S. L.; Lorito M. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 347, 123–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hofte M.Classes of Microbial Siderophore. In Iron Chelation in Plants and Soil Microorganisms; Barton L. L., Hemming C. B., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1993; Vol. 1, pp 3–23. [Google Scholar]
  18. Neilands J. B. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 26723–26726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hider R. C.; Kong X. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 637–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol503717r_si_001.pdf (912.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES