Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer is desirable to prevent progression to advanced disease. This subject has been one of significant study and debate for women at normal risk, and recommendations continue to evolve. However, with regard to women at high risk, the recommendations from various health care professional organizations, including the recent recommendations from the United States Preventative Services Task Force, are different and also inconsistent concerning when to begin screening and which modalities should be used. We review several randomized controlled trials and consensus opinions regarding when to begin screening for breast cancer and how to best screen women at high risk. Specifically, we address women with known personal history of breast cancer, prior mantle radiation, or specific family history (including genetic family history) of breast cancer. The purpose of this inquiry is to present current evidence and suggest a clinical pathway regarding the screening of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Keywords: breast cancer, screening for breast cancer, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging
Search Terms: women over 18 years of age, risk factors for breast cancer, breast cancer, screening modalities for breast cancer
Summary of the Issues
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women (12% lifetime risk) and the principal cause of cancer-related death for more than 3% of women.1 According to radiology society recommendations, earlier detection through imaging in low-risk patients has reduced breast cancer-related mortality by about one-third,1 although this type of early screening is a hotly debated topic. The United States Preventative Services Task Force currently recommends biennial screening mammography in average-risk women 50-74 years of age; for women under 50 years, the recommendation is for personal risk-based screening.2 This is a controversial change from prior recommendations of annual screening for women, with much of the debate coming from the American Cancer Society, the American College of Radiology, and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, groups that currently recommend annual mammography screening starting at age 40.
Adding to this controversy is the most recent study released by the Canadian National Breast Screening Study in February 2014, which concluded that annual screening of low-risk women 40-59 years of age does not reduce breast cancer beyond that of physical examination or usual care.3 This study was highly criticized by the American College of Radiology and the Society of Breast Imaging. They called the study “highly flawed” and reference outdated equipment use and poor methodology. However, the study’s authors refute these assertions and stand by their study.4
Mammography in women under age 50 is complicated by dense breast tissue generating a higher rate of false-positive breast cancer diagnoses, anxiety generated by the positive screenings, and risks of complications engendered by invasive procedures, thus the controversy surrounding routine mammography in this age group. Meta-analyses have reported a 20% reduction in 15-year mortality from breast cancer for women in their 40s.5 Put another way, the same authors estimated that “2 out of 1,000 women who regularly undergo mammography during their 40s might owe their lives to mammography.”6
Despite the numerous recommendations and confusions for screening for the low-risk population, there remains an even wider gap in concise recommendations for screening the high-risk patient population, and the availability of different screening modalities and conflicting recommendations regarding timing of screening has added to this confusion.2 Data from several cohort studies, a systematic review of randomized control trials, and consensus opinions all recommend that women with specific risk factors placing them at higher risk than the general population be screened beginning at age 40, or 10 years from the age of diagnosis of breast cancer in the youngest relative, but not before age 25.2 Risk factors to identify include a positive personal history of breast cancer (is excluded with some protocols7 but not others1), family history of breast cancer in a first- or second-degree relative, personal or family history of specific genetic mutations, personal or family history of ovarian cancer in a first- or second-degree relative, or prior mantle radiation.7
Multiple factors can affect the predictive value of screening tests, including age, screening interval, equipment quality/age, breast tissue density, and proficiency of the radiologist. Digital mammography has generally become the standard of care in breast cancer screening. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) is advocated in screening high-risk women, particularly in younger women or those with dense breast tissue,1,8,9 although the expense, increased risk of false positives, and lack of universal availability limit its usefulness.4
Summary of the Evidence
A British prospective multi-center cohort study compared CE-MRI and digital mammography in high-risk younger women. This population was chosen because of the dense breast tissue present and known decreased sensitivity of mammography in this age group. The inclusion criteria for the study included women 35-49 years of age with a high probability of BRCA1, BRCA2 or TP53 genetic mutations or a strong family history of breast cancer.8 CE-MRI yielded a higher tumor detection rate than mammography alone (p = 0.01). CE-MRI had a sensitivity of 77% (Confidence interval [CI]: 60-90) and a specificity of 81% (CI: 80-83) compared with mammography sensitivity of 40% (CI: 24-58) and specificity of 93% (CI: 92-95). Combined imaging modalities (CE-MRI and/or mammography) had a sensitivity of 94% (CI: 81-99) and specificity of 77% (CI: 75-79). CE-MRI detected more breast cancers than mammography (92% vs. 23%) in women specifically with BRCA1 genetic mutations (P=0.004).10
To determine if earlier breast cancer screening was beneficial in women with more risk factors for the disease, a more recent British study screened a cohort 7,475 women 35-50 years of age with enhanced risk of developing early breast cancer due to a strong family history (a first-degree relative <40 years of age or a first- or second-degree relative <60 years of age with breast cancer).9 In addition to family history data, other risk factor information was collected, including age at menarche/menopause, parity, use of female hormones, and age at first birth. Women who were found to have a >16.7% risk of developing breast cancer in their lifetime were selected for annual surveillance until age 50. Women with a lifetime risk of >25% were offered 18 monthly screenings in addition to their three yearly screenings between ages 51-60, which is normally covered by the National Health Service Breast Screening Program. Study participants were initially screened with single-view mammography until 1999 and two-view mammography thereafter. Clinical breast examination (CBE) was performed on all women by specialized nursing staff before mammography, and self-breast exam (SBE) instruction was offered to all women. Participants were encouraged to return if they detected any worrisome changes or findings on SBE. Earlier screening resulted in the detection of 165 breast cancers, 106 of which were in women <50 years of age. The cancers detected were of more advanced grade, with a tendency for younger women to have grade 3 tumors (P=0.08).11
The Society of Breast Imaging and American College of Radiology collaboratively appraised multiple peer-reviewed published scientific data from meta-analyses of European and North American randomized controlled trials, expert consensus opinions, and supporting guidelines to provide direction on both the type of imaging to use and when to start screening women with specific risk factors for breast cancer. Identified specific risk factors supporting screening before age 40 include women with genetic mutations known to increase breast cancer risk by age 40 and women who underwent mantle field radiation at 10-30 years of age.1
A cross-sectional study comparing screening mammography in women with history of breast cancer in one or more first-degree relatives against those of similar age without such history found more cancers in the first group (6.1 per 1,000 vs. 4.0 per 1,000), corresponding to that in average-risk women a decade older. However, the sensitivity of mammography increases with age (87.0% for age 60-69; 67.9% for age 30-39) and is less beneficial in younger women. Nevertheless, mammography has a higher positive predictive value (3.7% in the first group vs. 2.9%, P=0.001) in those with a family history positive for breast cancer.12
Conclusions
For women with specific personal or family risk factors placing them at higher risk for developing breast cancer versus the general population, breast cancer screening beginning prior to age 50 with digital mammography and, in specific circumstances, digital mammography combined with CE-MRI screening is recommended. Earlier screening (<40 years) appears warranted in this high-risk population even though mammography is less sensitive in younger women.12 CE-MRI is more sensitive in detecting malignancy in women with known personal genetic mutations for breast or ovarian cancer, and/or with a prior personal history of mantle radiation treatment. Digital mammography combined with CE-MRI should be offered to these women. A suggested clinical pathway is illustrated in Figure 1. As part of the process of recommending earlier breast cancer screening, a discussion of the risks and benefits of earlier screening should be performed with these high-risk women.
Figure 1. Breast Cancer Screening Questions & Clinical Pathway.

Clinical Question
In women with increased risk factors for breast cancer, at what age should screening begin and with what modality?
Answer
Women with a family history of breast cancer should have annual digital mammography as warranted before age 40, or 10 years younger than the youngest family member diagnosed with breast cancer, but not before age 25. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) with digital mammography, as well as annual clinical breast examination (CBE) beginning CBE at age 40, is recommended in screening women with known genetic mutations enhancing breast cancer risk or who have first-degree relatives with these mutations. Women treated with mantle radiation should undergo annual CE-MRI, digital mammography screening, and CBE, commencing 8 years after completion of treatment, or at age 25. Per the Society of Breast Imaging and the American College of Radiology, this screening should start at age 30, although this specific timing recommendation differs when other groups evaluate the evidence.
Date answer was determined: October 2014
Level of Evidence for the Answer: A
Inclusion Criteria: Published systematic reviews, meta-analysis, cohort studies and consensus guidelines on the timing of and modalities used to screen for breast cancer in women with a history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative.
Exclusion Criteria: non-English language articles.
Acknowledgments
Clin-IQ (Clinical Inquiries) is a required resident/faculty scholarly activity that takes questions from community practitioners and feeds the answers back out to improve patient care. L.H.M. received support from Oklahoma Shared Clinical & Translational Resources, funded by grant NIGMS U54GM104938, NIGMS/NIH.
Footnotes
Prior Presentations: An abbreviated version of this paper was presented as a poster at the Oklahoma Academy of Family Physicians Annual Meeting: Tulsa, OK, June 20, 2014.
Institutional Review Board: None required
Conflicts of Interest: None
References
- 1.Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2014;348:g366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Printz C. Mammogram debate flares up: Latest breast cancer screening study fuels controversy. Cancer. 2014;120:1755–6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003:348, 1672–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp021804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;349:610–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.National Guideline, C. Breast cancer screening clinical practice guideline. Retrieved 10/17/2014, from http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=33565.
- 8.Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ahern CH, Shih YC, Dong W, Parmigiani G, Shen Y. Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for integrating MRI into breast cancer screening for women at high risk. Br J Cancer. 2014111:1542–51. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) Lancet. 2005;365:1769–78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maurice A, Evans DG, Affen J, Greenhalgh R, Duffy SW, Howell A. Surveillance of women at increased risk of breast cancer using mammography and clinical breast examination: further evidence of benefit. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:417–25. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Geller B, et al. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:855–63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-11-200012050-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
